This document summarizes an initial physical exam where the doctor's impression was that the patient likely had NSAID-induced peptic ulcer disease. Tests for blood in the stool came back negative multiple times. The doctor advised following a high fiber diet, avoiding NSAIDs if possible, and said that if symptoms did not improve, a gastroscopy would be appropriate.
This document summarizes an initial physical exam where the doctor's impression was that the patient likely had NSAID-induced peptic ulcer disease. Tests for blood in the stool came back negative multiple times. The doctor advised following a high fiber diet, avoiding NSAIDs if possible, and said that if symptoms did not improve, a gastroscopy would be appropriate.
This document summarizes an initial physical exam where the doctor's impression was that the patient likely had NSAID-induced peptic ulcer disease. Tests for blood in the stool came back negative multiple times. The doctor advised following a high fiber diet, avoiding NSAIDs if possible, and said that if symptoms did not improve, a gastroscopy would be appropriate.
It is my impression that the patient has probable NSAID-induced
peptic ulcer disease. I gave the patient rehem hemocoel all of which were returned and were subsequently negative. If at a future day, the patient requires increasing dosage of NSAIDs her stool should be re-examined, and if at any time they are positive, I would proceed with gastroscopy. My impression was that he possibly had ulcer disease. He was given a trial of Tagamet 400 mg p.o. b.i.d. He was also given hemocoel cords, which he sent back and which were subsequently negative on three different occasions. He was also given the cancer society per se on the guidelines for preventing cancer. He was instructed to eat a high fibre diet. We suggested that he read the “Save your life diet book.” I discussed with him that, if he did not get to defecate relief it would appropriate to proceed with gastroscopy.