You are on page 1of 6

XII Congreso CYTAL - AATA

Facultad de Ciencias de la Alimentación, UNER,


Entre Ríos, Argentina, 7-9 de octubre 2009

EFFECTS OF LEAF AGE AND TEMPERATURE ON SEVERAL QUALITY


INDICES OF BUTTERHEAD LETTUCE DURING FIRST HOURS AFTER
HARVEST.

Agüero M.V.1,2,*; Ponce, A.G.1,2; Bevilacqua A2,3; and Roura SI1,2


1
Grupo de Investigación en Ingeniería en Alimentos. Facultad de Ingeniería. Universidad Nacional de Mar del
Plata. Juan B. Justo 4302. Zip code: 7600. Mar del Plata. Argentina, mvaguero@fi.mdp.edu.ar. 2CONICET.
3
Departamento de Ingeniería Química. Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad Nacional de La Plata.

Abstract: Whole lettuce plants were used to evaluate the effect of leaf age (and
exposure level) on ascorbic acid (A), chlorophyll (C), microbial quality (M), colour
and overall visual quality of fresh butterlettuce exposed at three isothermal
environmental conditions: 0-2, 10-12 and 20-22ºC during first hours after harvest.
Temperature, leaf age and time significantly affect the quality parameters under
study. Detriment of lettuce quality was detected in the first few hours after harvest.
In general terms, decreases in quality indices were higher at higher temperature and
time. Outer leaves (older leaves) resulted the most affected tissue by exposure
conditions, while inner leaves (younger) were the least affected.
Keywords: lettuce, leaf age, temperature, quality indices.

INTRODUCTION The objective of the present research was to


Fresh vegetables are highly perishable products and describe the response of different lettuce leaves
its shelf life is mainly affected by handling (outer, mid and inner) to the exposure at three
procedures, temperature, and relative humidity isothermal conditions (0-2, 10-12 and 20-22ºC)
(Kader 2002). Rapid management from farm to during the first hours after harvest. Evaluated
table, and at optimal conditions, is a desirable responses were several quality indicators: a) total
feature because it minimizes economical and chlorophyll content and b) colour changes as
quality losses during postharvest (Jones et al. greenness indexes, c) total microbial counts and as
1998). Effects of temperature over quality microbiological descriptor, and d) ascorbic acid
detriment of crops have been extensively studied retention as nutritional index.
and they are well known. However, few researches
have been developed to investigate the first few MATERIAL AND METHODS
hours after harvest together with leaf age and
Plant Material and Sample Preparation
exposure level (Moreira et al. 2006; Jedermamm et
al. 2007) Heads of greenhouse Butter lettuce (Lactuca sativa
Lettuce is one of the most popular leafy vegetables var. Lores) were grown in Sierra de los Padres, Mar
in the world. In Argentine farms, lettuce bins are del Plata, Argentina; and were harvested at optimal
usually exposed to inadequate and uncontrolled maturity. Once harvested, lettuce heads were
field conditions (usually high temperature) while it immediately transported to the laboratory, were six
is waiting to be transported from the field to whole plants were analyzed to obtain the initial
distribution centers. So the knowledge of the events value for each quality parameter.
occurring within the plant when temperature is Plants were exposed at three different isothermal
uncontrolled during first hours after harvest is of conditions (all at optimal relative humidity
fundamental importance to improve and optimize recommended for lettuce: 97-99%): 0-2ºC (optimal
lettuce management. temperature), 10-12ºC and 20-22 ºC. Temperatures
The lettuce head is an assemblage of heterogenic of 10-12ºC and 20-22ºC were chosen to simulate
morphological leaves (Wien, 1997). Its formation abusive refrigerated and room warm temperatures,
results from the accumulation of young leaves respectively. Sampling was carried out at 0, 3, 6
under the layers of leaves covering the growing and 24 hours after harvest.
point (Johnson, 1983). Several studies have been All parameters were measured in three different
demonstrated that these differences are reflected in zones of the lettuce head called external (outer and
the composition of leaves and its metabolic activity older leaves), middle (mid leaves) and internal zone
(Siomos et al. 2002; Del Nobile et al. 2006; Agüero (inner and younger leaves) (Agüero et al. 2008).
et al. 2008). In this way, the response of lettuce Three independent experimental runs were done.
tissue to temperature could be affected be the leaf
age.

1
XII Congreso CYTAL - AATA
Facultad de Ciencias de la Alimentación, UNER,
Entre Ríos, Argentina, 7-9 de octubre 2009

Total Chlorophyll Content Sensorial evaluation


To determine Total Chlorophyll Content (TC), all Immediately after lettuces were removed from
leaves in each zone were homogenized with a storage conditions, a panel composed by 9 trained
commercial blender (Multiquick, MR 5550 CA judges proceeded to the assessment. The coded (3
Braun, Espanola S.A., Barcelona, Spain) and two digit) samples were presented one at the time in
samples (1 g each) were taken from each random order to the judges. The judges were asked
homogenate. Each sample was then homogenized to evaluate overall visual quality of lettuce heads
with 19 ml of a cold solution 18:1 propanone: taking into account the following characteristics:
ammonium hydroxide (0.1N). This homogenate color (shade and uniformity), texture, browning and
was filtered through sintered glass and water was presence/absence of defects. A 9-point scale was
removed from the filtrate with anhydrous sodium used, where 9= excellent, 5= acceptable and 1=
sulfate. Absorbance of the filtrate at 660.0 and poor (Kader 2002).
642.5 nm was measured with a UV 1601 PC UV-
Statistical Analysis
visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Corporation,
Japan). Total Chlorophyll was calculated applying Results reported, are LSMEAN values (least square
the formula TC = 7.12A660 + 16.8 A642.5; in which mean, means estimators by the method of least
TC is the total chlorophyll concentration (mg L-1) squares) together with their standard deviations
and A660 and A642.5 are the absorbance at the (Khuel 2001). Data were analyzed using SAS,
corresponding wavelengths. TC is reported as mg software version 8.0 (SAS Inc. 1999). PROC GLM
of chlorophyll / 100 g fresh weight. (General linear model procedure) was used for the
analysis of variance (ANOVA). For all parameters,
Total Microbial Counts
except sensorial quality, the factors employed as
The enumeration of total microorganisms was sources of variation were: TIME (time after
performed. Ten grams of leaves were macerated in harvest), PLANT WITHIN TIME, ZONE (zone of
a buffer solution (PO4K3, pH=7.2). Microbial the plant), TEMPERATURE and interactions:
counts were carried out using Plate Count Agar TIME-ZONE; TIME-TEMPERATURE and TIME-
(PCA) incubated at 32-35 ºC for 48-72 h (ICMSF ZONE-TEMPERATURE. Differences between
1983). The culture media was from Britania zones, temperatures and time were determined by
(Buenos Aires, Argentina). Studies were performed the Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test (p<
by duplicate. Microbiological counts were 0.05). For sensorial quality data, the factor ZONE
expressed as log CFU / g of fresh weight. was not taken into account in order that overall
visual quality was evaluated in the whole lettuce
Reduced Ascorbic Acid content
plant.
To determine reduced ascorbic acid content, ground
lettuce leaves (20 g) were extracted with 100 mL of RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
metaphosphoric acid solution (60 g.Kg-1) for 3 min
Total Chlorophyll Content
using a commercial blender (Multiquick, MR 5550
CA Braun, Espanola S.A., Barcelona, Spain) with Initial chlorophyll content (TC) in harvested lettuce
an homogenizer speed of 3500 to 7000 rpm. The was significantly affected by leaf age (Table 1),
homogenate was made up to 250 mL with 30 g.Kg- being the content of the external zone 5 times
1 metaphosphoric acid and filtered through higher than that of the internal one. The higher
Whatman n° 42 filter paper. Temperature during exposure of outer leaves to sun light respect inner
ascorbic acid extraction was maintained at 0°C. leaves could be responsible for the differences in
Three aliquots (5 mL each) of the filtrate were chlorophyll concentrations between zones.
titrated with 2,6- dichloroindophenol. Ascorbic acid
Table 1. Quality indices at harvest.
contents were reported as mg / 100 g of fresh
weight. Quality Lettuce zone
parameter External Middle Internal
Colour Chlorophyll 51,74 ± 1,93a 22,13 ± 2,11b 10,60 ± 1,76c
L* 59,113 ± 1,95b 65,71 ± 3,38b 76,06 ± 2,00a
Colour determination was carried out using a a* -19,73 ± 0,83 a
-19,25 ± 1,28 a
-16,30 ± 1,25b
Minolta colorimeter CR 300 Series (Osaka, Japan) b* 34,64 ± 0,88c 37,26 ± 0,85b 40,50 ± 0,78a
with an 8 mm diameter measuring area. The colour Microbial
5,95 ± 0,10a 5,83 ± 0,11a 5,64 ± 0,15a
count
was measured by L, a* and b* chromaticity co- Ascorbic acid 9,55 ± 0,58b 11,35 ± 0,68ª 9,52 ± 0,88b
ordinates of the CIELab* scale. The instrument was Means with the same superscripts were not significantly
calibrated with a standard white plate (L = 93.97, different (P < 0.05).
a* = -21.85 and b* = 1.21). Colour was measured
in all leaves integrating each lettuce zone. Ten The exposure of almost all vegetables to inadequate
different points were at least measured in each leaf. temperatures brings about certain degradation on
Mean values for L, a* and b* parameters were chlorophyll pigments (King et al. 2001; Yongguang
calculated for each leaf, and then for each zone. et al. 2007; Zhang at el. 2008). ANOVA applied to
chlorophyll data showed a significant interaction

2
XII Congreso CYTAL - AATA
Facultad de Ciencias de la Alimentación, UNER,
Entre Ríos, Argentina, 7-9 de octubre 2009

between ZONE and TIME factors. This fact implies in lettuce exposed to different temperature
that each zone have a particular behavior during conditions. The significant differences detected
postharvest. In this way, while the external zone between zones at harvest were maintained as time
exhibited chlorophyll pigments degradation advanced at the three evaluated temperatures; i.e. at
throughout 24 hours at any assayed temperature, the each sampling time and at the three assayed
middle and internal zones showed no chlorophyll temperatures, outer and mid leaves resulted more
content changes during such period. Fig. 1 depicts green (lower a* values) than inner ones. Samples
the evolution of TC in external zone during 24 exposed to the highest temperature registered the
hours after harvest. lowest absolute value of a* parameter during the
60 sampling time in the three lettuce zones. Significant
decreases in the absolute value of a* were observed
(mg / 100 g fresh weight)

50
Chlorophyll content

40
during 24 hours in the three zones and the three
analyzed temperatures and the highest decrease was
30
observed in internal zone at 20-22ºC.
20
10 Table 2 – a* value in external (E), middle (M) and
0 internal (I) zones of lettuce heads during 24 hours of
exposition to three different isothermal conditions (0-2,
0 5 10 15 20 25
10-12 and 20-22ºC).
Time (hours)
Time (h) Zone a* values
Figure 1. Chlorophyll content evolution in external zone E -19,73 ± 0,83
of lettuce heads during 24 hours of exposure to 0 M -19,25 ± 1,28
I -16,30 ± 1,25
isothermal conditions: (U)20ºC; (×)10ºC; (♦)0ºC. 0-2ºC 10-12ºC 20-22ºC
-19,37 ± -19,35 ± -18,89 ±
E
Differences in chlorophyll degradation between 0,32 0,56 0,24
-19,49 ± -18,85 ± -18,90 ±
zones could be related to the higher exposure of 3 M
1,52 0,56 1,07
outer leaves to environmental factors such as light I
-15,89 ± -13,47 ± -12,88 ±
and oxygen, which could fasten pigment 0,88 3,86 1,52
-19,51 ± -18,13 ± -18,93 ±
deterioration. As a response to harvest stress, when E
1,09 2,37 0,03
water and nutrient supply was cut off, outer leaves 6 M
-18,43 ± -16,84 ± -18,03 ±
0,90 0,21 1,61
(the most mature leaves of lettuce head, and leaves -12,86 ± -12,49 ± -12,43 ±
I
that are also near its physiological senescence) 1,04 0,58 2,41
could trigger different physiological responses. At -19,32 ± -19,07 ± -18,87 ±
E
0,34 0,35 0,06
harvest, senescence process is induced artificially -19,14 ± -17,94 ± -17,44 ±
24 M
as a result of the removal of nutrient supplies (Page 0,16 2,26 0,40
-15,26 ± -12,22 ± -11,06 ±
et al. 2001). As a rapid response, the degradation of I
0,76 1,86 2,04
TC was evident in outer leaves, which started
showing signs of chlorophyll losses. A decrease in the absolute value of a* indicates a
Colour reduction of green colour mainly associated with
chlorophyll degradation (Rico et al. 2008).
Lightness parameter (L*) in lettuce at harvest However, in the present work, decreases in
showed significant differences among zones (Table chlorophyll concentration were not detected in
1). The highest L* value was observed in internal internal zone while changes in a* parameter were
zone, decreasing towards the external one. The detected in this zone. Del Nobile et al. (2006),
exposure of lettuce heads to different temperature studying the effect of film packaging on quality and
conditions during 24 hours did not introduce shelf life of lettuce, found the highest changes of a*
significant changes in L* parameter as a function of parameter in inner leaves and associated this result
time or temperature (data not shown). Other authors to the highest susceptibility of this leaves to
(Han et al. 2004; Martínez-Romero et al. 2008) also browning.
found for lettuce no significant changes in L* Blueness/yellowness parameter (b*) in lettuce at
parameter throughout storage time. harvest resulted positive in all zones indicating the
Redness/greenness parameter (a*) in lettuce at predominance of yellow in this scale. Significant
harvest resulted in a negative value in all zones differences between zones were found in b* values
indicating the predominance of green colour in the at harvest, being higher (more yellow) in inner
product. Results showed significant differences leaves than in mid and outer leaves (Table 1). b*
between a* values in each zone at harvest, being values obtained for lettuce zones during time of
more negative (more green) in external and middle exposure to different temperatures are presented in
zones (without significant differences between Table 3. During the sampling time no changes were
them) than in internal one (Table 1). Green colour registered in b* values as time advanced at any
of inner leaves is less intense and this fact was analyzed temperature and zone. Moreover,
reflected in a* values obtained for each zone. Table significant differences in b* values detected among
2 presents a* values obtained during sampling time lettuce zones at harvest were maintained as time

3
XII Congreso CYTAL - AATA
Facultad de Ciencias de la Alimentación, UNER,
Entre Ríos, Argentina, 7-9 de octubre 2009

advanced at the three evaluated temperatures. It was Ascorbic acid content


found that samples exposed to high temperatures
Initial ascorbic acid (AA) content in middle zone
registered lowest values of b* parameter.
resulted significantly higher in middle zone than in
Table 3 – b* value in external (E), middle (M) and external and internal ones. (Table 1). This could be
internal (I) zones of lettuce heads during 24 hours of related to the degree of tissue development. Outer
exposition to three different isothermal conditions (0-2, leaves, being older and more senescent tissue had
10-12 and 20-22ºC). lower AA contents because degradative reactions
Time (h) Zone b* values may have begun in this leaves. Inner leaves, being
E 34,64 ± 0,88 the youngest tissue in the lettuce plant, have lower
0 M 37,26 ± 0,85
I 40,50 ± 0,78 AA content than mid leaves probably because the
0-2ºC 10-12ºC 20-22ºC AA synthesis in young tissue is lower than in fully
E 35,05 ± 34,81 ± 34,03 ± expanded leaves (mid leaves).
0,05 0,22 1,83
M 38,25 ± 38,29 ± 35,73 ± Numerous factors affect AA degradation, mainly
3
0,75 1,24 2,41 temperature, salt and sugar concentrations, pH,
I 42,18 ± 39,18 ± 38,27 ± oxygen, enzymes, among others (Davey et al.
3,49 4,46 0,40
E 36,45 ± 33,77 ± 33,72 ± 2000). At each temperature and at each sampling
0,54 3,35 0,09 time, the three zones presented similar AA values.
M 37,34 ± 34,27 ± 34,42 ±
6
2,53 1,82 4,47 For this reason, the three zones were considered
I 42,31 ± 39,08 ± 36,92 ± together as a pool of data to compare effect of
2,85 5,83 2,95 temperature and time (Fig 3).
E 34,19 ± 34,31 ± 33,69 ±
0,56 0,02 0,52 12

(mg / 100 g fresh weight)


M 36,96 ± 34,21 ± 33,07 ±
24 10
1,93 2,79 1,53
Ascorbic Acid
I 46,09 ± 37,92 ± 33,24 ± 8
0,56 6,32 6,14
6
4
Total microbial counts 2
The largest population in green vegetables is the 0
mesophilic microflora (Watada 1996). Initial 0 5 10 15 20 25
microbial counts for external, middle and internal Time (hours)
zones were not significantly different (Table 1).
This fact could express that microorganisms found Figure 3. LSMEANS for Ascorbic acid content evolution
similar preharvest environmental and nutritional in the three zones together during 24 hours of exposure to
isothermal conditions: (U)20ºC; (×)10ºC; (♦)0ºC.
conditions in each zone. Fig. 2 shows total
increments in microbial counts for each lettuce
zone at each temperature (LOG(Nt/N0)). Microbial The highest AA contents corresponded to lettuces
counts evolution during 24 hours differed taking exposed to 0ºC during the entire sampling period.
into account the zone and the temperature. In the The behavior of AA at 10 and 20ºC did not present
three lettuce zones increments in microbial counts significant differences between them but they were
occurred during the first 24 hours of exposure to lower than values at 0ºC. AA decreases during the
different temperatures, being higher in external 24 h at the three assayed temperatures. When
zone with respect to middle and internal ones and temperature was 10 or 20ºC, losses of about 50%
resulting greater when temperature was 20ºC were detected in the first 6 hours, while 30% of
instead of 10ºC or 0ºC. losses were detected at 0ºC in this time. At the end
of the 24 hours of sampling, losses reached 40% (at
4,0 0ºC) and 50% (at 10 and 20ºC). Losses of AA at
optimal temperature (0-2ºC) could be associated to
LOG (N24/N0)

3,0
External
stress induced by harvest (Davey et al. 2000; Lee et
2,0
Middle
al. 1982).
1,0 Internal Sensorial quality
0,0
Table 4 shows changes in overall visual quality
0 10 20
(OVQ) of lettuce head during 24 hours of the
Temperature(ºC) exposure to different temperatures. Panelists did not
detect significant changes in OVQ of lettuce heads
Figure 2. Microbial counts change (LOG(N24/N0) ) in exposed to optimal temperature. When lettuce
external, middle and internal zone of lettuce heads after heads were exposed to abusive temperatures,
24 hours of exposure to isothermal conditions. panelists detected significant decreases in OVQ at
24 hours of exposure (p= 0.0021 and p< 0.0001,
respectively). Main differences were registered at
24 h in texture quality of lettuce heads exposed to

4
XII Congreso CYTAL - AATA
Facultad de Ciencias de la Alimentación, UNER,
Entre Ríos, Argentina, 7-9 de octubre 2009

10 and 20ºC. Panelists detected moderate losses of age on the evolution of quality indices is of
turgidity and texture. Another phenomenon fundamental importance for producers because they
detected by panelists was the degree of browning can take decisions in order of this differential
developed in the base of the lettuce due to the cut behavior according to degree of development of
made during picking. At 24 h of exposure, lettuces tissue. In this way they could use different lettuce
at 10-12 and 20-22ºC presented cut bases with leaves for different uses as fresh consumption,
moderate and objectionable browning to severe minimally processed products, among others.
browning (rusty-brown), respectively. At optimal
exposed temperature, only slight and not ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
objectionable browning in the cut base was This work was supported by Consejo Nacional de
detected. After 24 h of storage the best quality Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET),
attributes were observed in lettuces exposed to Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y
optimal temperature immediately after harvest. Tecnológica (Secyt), and Universidad Nacional de
Table 4 – Overall visual quality of lettuce head during the
Mar del Plata (UNMDP).
exposure to three different isothermal conditions (0-2 ºC,
10-12 ºC and 20-22 ºC). REFERENCES
Agüero, M. V., M. V. Barg, A. Yommi, A. Camelo
Time (h) Initial OVQ and S. I. Roura (2008), Postharvest Changes in
0 9 ± 0.1 Water Status and Chlorophyll Content of lettuce
0-2ºC 10-12ºC 20-22ºC
(Lactuca sativa L.) and their Relationship with
3 8.9 ± 0.1 8.9 ± 0.2 8.9 ± 0.1
6 8.9 ± 0.1 8.8 ± 0.1 8.7 ± 0.3 Overall Visual Quality, Journal of Food Science,
24 8.5 ± 0.5 8.1 ± 0.3 7.5 ± 0.6 Vol. 73(1), pp. 176-185.
Davey, M. W., M. Van Montagu, D. Inzé, M.
Sanmartin, A. Kanellis, N. Smirnoff, I. J. J.
CONCLUSION Benzie, J. J. Strain, D. Favell and J. Fletcher
Leaf age had a significant effect on the initial (2000), Plant L-ascorbic acid: chemistry,
greenness and nutritional indices of butterhead function, metabolism, bioavailability and effects
lettuce. Older leaves (external zone) showed higher of processing, Journal of the Science of Food and
chlorophyll concentration and lower L* and a* Agriculture, Vol. 80, pp. 825-860.
values, than younger leaves characterized by Del Nobile, M. A., A. Baiano, A. Benedetto and L.
clearest colour (high L* and a* values and low Massignan (2006), Respiration rate of minimally
chlorophyll content). Ascorbic acid in mid leaves processed lettuce as affected by packaging,
resulted higher than in outer and inner leaves. Journal of Food Engineering, Vol. 74, pp. 60-69.
Microbial counts in lettuce at harvest were not ICMSF (1983), Microorganismos de los Alimentos
affected by leaf age, showing the three lettuce I. Técnicas de Análisis Microbiológicos, Acribia
zones, similar values of these parameters. SA, Zaragoza.
Detriment in butterhead lettuce initial quality Ihl, M., L. Aravena, E. Scheuermann, E. Uquiche
begins in the first hours after harvest and was and V. Bifani (2003), Effect of immersion
affected by both temperature and leaf age. solutions on shelf life of minimally processed
Important nutritional losses occurred even though lettuce, LWT – Food Science and Technology,
lettuces were exposed to optimal temperature (0- Vol. 36, pp. 591-599.
2ºC), however losses were more important at higher Jedermamm R. and W. Lang (2007), Semi passive
abusive temperature. Leaf age did not affect the RFID and beyond – steps towards automated
degradation of ascorbic acid and the three lettuce quality models tracing in the food chain. In: Fifth
zones showed similar degradation pattern only RFID Academia Convocation. Orlando, Florida,
affected by temperature. Chlorophyll losses were 30 April 2007.
detected at 3 hours of storage at the three exposure Johnson, H. (1983), Head formation in crisphead
temperatures and were only evident in outer leaves. lettuce, HortScience, Vol. 18, pp. 595-xxx
Mid and inner leaves did not show any change in its Jones, H. G. and F. Tardieu (1998), Modelling
chlorophyll contents during 24 h of exposure at water relations of horticultural crops: a review,
different temperatures. From a bacteriological point Scientia Horticulturae, Vol. 74, pp. 21-26.
of view, 24 h of exposure to both 10 and 20ºC Kader, A. A. (2002), Quality parameters of fresh-
dangerously increased the number of microbial cut fruit and vegetable products, Fresh-cut Fruits
counts diminishing the microbiological quality of and Vegetables /eds. O. Lamikanra/, CRC Press,
the product. In conclusion, maintaining the correct New York.
storage and transport temperature from the harvest Khuel, R. O. (2001), Diseño de experimentos, 2nd
to the consumer is an important factor in edition, Thompson Learning International,
minimizing quality loss. Despite this, it is often México.
overlooked. This is sometimes due to commercial King, V., C. Liu and Y. Liu (2001), Chlorophyll
constraints, but it can also be due to a lack of stability in spinach dehydrated by freeze-drying
information. The knowledge of the effect of leaf and controlled low temperature vacuum

5
XII Congreso CYTAL - AATA
Facultad de Ciencias de la Alimentación, UNER,
Entre Ríos, Argentina, 7-9 de octubre 2009

dehydration, Food Research International, Vol.


34, pp. 167–175.
Lee, C. Y., L. M. Massey, J. P. Van Buren (1982),
Effects of Post-Harvest Handling and Processing
on Vitamin Contents of Peas, Journal of Food
Science, Vol. 47, pp. 961-964.
Martínez-Romero, D., M. Serrano, G. Bailén, F.
Guillén, P. J. Zapata, J. M. Valverde, S. Castillo,
M. Fuentes and D. Valero (2008), The use of
natural fungicide as an alternative to preharvest
synthetic fungicide treatments to control lettuce
deterioration during postharvest storage,
Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 47(1),
pp. 54-60.
Moreira, M. R., A. G. Ponce, C. E. del Valle, R.
Ansorena and S. I. Roura (2006),. Effects of
abusive temperatures on the postharvest quality
of lettuce leaves: ascorbic acid loss and microbial
gowth, Journal of Applied Horticulture, Vol.
8(2), pp. 109-113.
Page, T., G. Griffiths and V. Buchanan-Wollaston
(2001), Molecular and biochemical
characterization of postharvest senescence in
broccoli, Plant Physiology, Vol. 125, pp. 718–
727.
Siomos, A. S., P. P. Papadopoulou, C. C. Dogras,
A. Vasiliadis, A. Dosas and N. Georgiou (2002),
Lettuce Composition as Affected by Genotype
and Leaf Position, Acta Horticulturae, Vol. 579,
pp. 635-639.
Rico, D., A. B. Martín-Diana, C. Barry-Ryan, J. M.
Frías, G. T. M. Henehan and J. M. Barat (2008),
Optimisation of steamer jet-injection to extend
the shelf life of fresh-cur lettuce, Postharvest
Biology and Technology, Vol. 48(3), pp. 431-
442.
Watada, A.E., N. P. Ko and D. A. Minott (1996),
Factors affecting quality of fresh-cut horticultural
products, Postharvest Biology and Technology,
Vol. 9, pp. 115-125.
Wien, H.C. (1997), The Physiology of Vegetable
Crops. CAB International, New York.
Yongguang, Y., H. Yong and L. Jingbo (2007), A
novel protecting method for visual green color in
spinach puree treated by high intensity pulsed
electric fields, Journal of Food Engineering, Vol.
79, pp. 1256–1260.
Zhang, M., Z. G. Zhan, S. J. Wang and J. M. Tang
(2008), Extending the shelf-life of asparagus
spears with a compressed mix of argon and xenon
gases, LWT – Food Science and Technology,
Vol. 41, pp. 686-691.

You might also like