Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cuttack.
Date: .3.2020 Advocate.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, ORISSA : CUTTACK.
9. Vakalatnama.
Cuttack.
Date: .3.2020 Signature of the Applicant.
6. Statement of account.
__________________________________________________________
Total Sheets 85
Cuttack.
Date: .3.2020 Signature of the Applicant.
… Defendants.
4. LIMITATION :
The applicant further declares that the application is within the jurisdiction of
this Tribunal prescribed in Section 24 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Bank
and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.
That Sri. Subrat Kumar Sahu is the Branch Manager of the applicant
bank and is authorized to sign, verify the application before any court or
Tribunal and to do all necessary acts that may be found necessary on behalf
of the bank. That the applicant bank carries on business of banking such as
accepting deposits, lending and or advancing loans to various persons and
further carries such other activities as are permissible under the banking
Laws.
ii) That the defendant No.1 Proprietorship Firm is the borrower, the
defendant No.2 is the borrower and guarantor/mortgagor and defendant
No.3 is the coobligant and guarantor/mortgagor to the cash credit facility
granted by the applicant bank. That the defendant No.3 has mortgaged the
schedule-A property to the applicant bank. That all the defendants are jointly
and severally liable to pay the dues of the bank.
iii) That the defendants No.1 to 3 approached the applicant bank At-
Nilakantha Nagar Branch, Nilakantheswar Temple Road, Near Lingaraja Hall,
Berhampur, Dist-Ganjam, Pin-760002 and filed an application for the
sanction of Open Cash Credit facility of Rs.20 Lakhs for the for working
capital requirement of the business of trading in tractor spares and
assembly of tractor,trolley and agricultural implements, against the
hypothecation of stock of the business and co-lateral security of residential
belonging of defendant no 3 , situated at Khata Sl No-702/620, Plot No-
603/1837, Revenue Mouza-Kumari , Tahasil-Purushottampur, Dist-Ganjam,
area Ac 0.030 dec . That the applicant bank considering the aforesaid
application of the defendants No.1 to 3 vide letter dt.08.08.17 sanctioned
OCC limit of Rs.20,00,000/- in their favour with interest 10.9% against
hypothecation of stocks and Book debts and collateral security i.e equitable
mortgage of residential belonging , situated at Khata Sl No-702/620, Plot
No- 603/1837, Revenue Mouza-Kumari , Tahasil-Purushottampur, Dist-
Ganjam, area Ac 0.030 dec , belong to the defendant No.3 with other terms
and conditions enumerated in the said sanction letter for their business. That
the letter of Sanction dt. 08.08.17 was acknowledged by all the defendants
No.1 to 3 as token of the fact that the terms and conditions of the Open
Cash Credit limit was accepted to them. That the defendants accepted the
terms and conditions of the sanction letter dt. 08.08.17 and availed the
Open Cash Credit facility and executed necessary documents of the bank in
its standard format as required by the bank. The copy of the application of
the defendants No.1 to 3 and the sanction letter dt. 08.08.17 are annexed
as Annexures-1 and 2.
vi) That the borrower failed to repay the outstanding amount within the
60 days limit provided in the said demand notice dt. 07.09.19. That from the
aforesaid facts it is clear that the defendants have violated the terms and
conditions of the sanction letters of the Bank.
vii) That the borrowers having failed to repay the outstanding amount, the
applicant bank issued a possession notice dt.04.01.20 under Rule 8(1) of
security Interest (Enforcement) Rules 2002, Schedule A property of
defendant No.1 to the borrower, co-obligant and the public in general. That
in the said notice the borrower`s attention is invited to provisions of section
13(8) of the Act, in respect of time available, to redeem the secured asset.
That in the said notice the borrower, the co-obligant and the public in
general are cautioned not to deal with the schedule-A property. The said
posession notice dt.04.01.20 is annexed as Annexture-6.
viii) That the applicant bank through its authorized officer has taken
symbolic possession of the secured asset on 04.01.20 but the borrower
resisted to handover the possession of the mortgaged property to authorized
officer. That the borrower prevented authorized officer from taking actual
possession of the secured asset. That the applicant bank filed and
application dt 31.01.20 u/s 14 of SARFAESI ACT 2002 in the court of district
magistrate, Dist-Ganjam, Chatrapaur. The said application dt.31.01.20 is
annexted as Annexture-7.
ix) That the defendants availed OCC limit of Rs.20,00,000/- for their
business and embarked upon the business, but in breach of the agreed
terms and conditions defaulted in repayment dues to the applicant bank
along with monthly interest. That the defendants failed to discharge the
liabilities and violated the terms and conditions of the documents executed
by them which has been reflected in the statement of Account. The copy of
the statement account in respect of OCC account along with normal and
overdue interest is annexed as Annexure-8.
xii) That the cause of action for this original application arose when the
defendants No. 1 to 3 approached for loan, the loan was sanctioned,
operation of the loan accounts started, mortgaged the Schedule-A property
on 08.08.17 when the defendants No.1 to 3 failed to repay the loan
outstanding of the applicant bank as per the notice dt.07.09.19 u/s 13 (2) of
the SARFAESI Act.
xiii) That the interest charged on the said loan is as per the stipulation
made by the RBI from time to time subject to amendment.
6. RELIEF(s) SOUGHT :
That in view of the facts mentioned in Paragraph-5 the applicant Bank
prays for the following reliefs:
b) That an order for pendent lite and future interest at the agreed rate
applicable to the OCC availed by the defendants and as per the charge
from time to time may be passed with monthly rest till realization of
the claim amount against the defendants jointly and severally.
c) That an order be passed fixing a date and direction to all the
defendants to pay the certificate dues with interest, other costs and
charges and cost of this application.
f) Any other relief the Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the
interest of Justice.
b) And or any other order as deem fit and proper in the circumstances
of the case.
SCHEDULE – A PROPERTY
Description of property mortgaged by the Defendant No.3 Siba Sankar
Panda ,S/o Ramakrushna Panda (Owner of the property), Situated at Khata
Sl No-702/620, Plot No- 603/1837, Revenue Mouza-Kumari , Tahasil-
Purushottampur, Dist-Ganjam, area Ac 0.030 dec .
Boundary:
North- Aska Humma Road , South- Site of Surendra Panda , East- Site of
Bhaskar Sahu , West-Site of Bishnu reddy.
VERIFICATION
I, Sri. Subrat Kumar Sahu, aged about 32 years, S/o Dolamani Sahu,
Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Nilakantha Nagar Branch, Nilakantheswar
Temple Road, Near Lingaraja Hall, Berhampur, Dist-Ganjam, Pin-760002
having the valid power of attorney of the bank do hereby verify that the
contents in Paragraphs-1 to 11 are true to the best of my knowledge and
based on official records maintained in the Branch and I have not
suppressed any material facts. I sign this verification on day of March,
2020..
Cuttack.
Date: .3.2020 Verificant.
To,
The Registrar, DRT, Cuttack