Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Submillimeter Continuum Observations of NGC 7538
Submillimeter Continuum Observations of NGC 7538
# 2004. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A.
ABSTRACT
We present high-resolution millimeter and submillimeter maps (1.3 mm and 850, 800, 450, and 350 m) of the
molecular cloud southeast of NGC 7538, obtained on the IRAM 30 m telescope at Pico Veleta, Spain and the 15 m
James Clerk Maxwell Telescope on Mauna Kea, Hawaii. These maps show filamentary dust ridges extending from
and connecting to the three major activity centers (IRS 1–3, NGC 7538 S, and IRS 9) in this high-mass star–forming
cloud. In addition to the three already known star formation centers, we also find a fainter extended submillimeter
source near the 20 m source IRS 4, at the boundary of the optical H ii region. Our high spatial resolution images
resolve the young, hypercompact H ii region IRS 1 and show that it coincides with a compact (<1000 ) elliptical dust
source with a mass of 70 M. It is surrounded by a cluster of submillimeter sources, none of which have near- or
mid-IR counterparts. Three of the submillimeter sources are associated with H2O masers, suggesting that protostars
or young stars have formed in these cloud cores. We find IRS 9 to be an extended elliptical source with a size of
13 00 6 00 at a position angle of 80, with a second, fainter but more extended source about 2000 south of it. The
mass of the IRS 9 submillimeter source is 150 M, while the southern source has a mass of 90 M. The third
activity center, NGC 7538 S, is 8000 south of IRS 1. Here we find a strong, elliptical submillimeter source of
12 00 7 00 , with a position angle of 58 . This source coincides with OH and H2O masers and a faint VLA 6 cm source,
but it shows no near- or mid-infrared emission. We find NGC 7538 S to have all the characteristics of a Class 0
source; i.e., it is a high-mass protostar. It is cold, Td 35 K, has a disklike geometry, drives a very young outflow,
and is extremely massive, M 400 M. Yet it has a luminosity of only 104 L.
Subject headings: circumstellar matter — ISM: clouds — ISM: individual (NGC 7538) — stars: formation —
stars: pre–main-sequence — submillimeter
onto equatorial coordinates using linear interpolation onto a improvement in spatial resolution over 1400 , but still not suffi-
100 grid. The rms level measured in emission-free areas of the cient to resolve the source. At 1.3 mm we restored all subfields
maps was found to be 0.13 Jy beam1 for the 850 m map and with a 1200 beam, while all 450 m maps were restored with an
0.9 Jy beam1 at 450 m. The calibration accuracy is estimated 800 beam.
to be better than 10% at 850 m and about 20% at 450 m. The UKT 14 maps and the CLEANed SCUBA and 1.3 mm
images were used to derive accurate positions, source sizes,
2.3. IRAM Observations and integrated intensities for all the compact sources that we
The 1.3 mm dust continuum emission was mapped with the could visually identify. We used the MIRIAD task IMFIT to
30 m IRAM telescope on Pico Veleta, Spain, on 1994 April 27 fit elliptical Gaussians with a two-component Gaussian fit:
and 29 with the MPIf R seven-channel bolometer array (Kreysa one compact component for the source and an extended
1992). The MPIf R bolometer array is centered on a frequency Gaussian for the surrounding cloud. Even though the sur-
of 236 GHz (1.27 mm). The HPBW was measured on Mars and rounding cloud may not be well described by a single
found to be 1200 . All the mapping was done with on-the-fly Gaussian, this approach works quite well if one limits the
mapping, i.e., scanning in azimuth while chopping in azimuth. region over which the fitting is done, so that the cloud
The scanning velocity was 400 s1. All maps were taken with a emission can be approximated by a Gaussian. The results from
chop throw of 3200 . The atmospheric opacity was monitored these fits are given in Tables 1 and 2.
using ‘‘skydips.’’ On April 27, the zenith optical depth was
fairly constant and 0.3, increasing to 0.5 toward the end of the 3. RESULTS
shift. On April 29, the zenith optical depth stayed constant in the
3.1. Large-Scale Structure
range 0.14–0.16.
The data reduction was done with MOPSI (Zylka 1998).4 Figure 1 shows the 450 m SCUBA image overlaid as a
Before gridding, the dual beam maps were extinction-corrected, contour map on a narrowband 2.12 m H2 map (Davis et al.
calibrated, despiked, baseline-subtracted, and restored to 1998). The three major activity centers, IRS 1–3, IRS 9, and
single-beam maps using the EKH algorithm (Emerson, Klein, NGC 7538 S (Werner et al. 1979; Thronson & Harper 1979), are
& Haslam 1979). No significant pointing offsets were found all associated with strong, extended dust emission and con-
between the individual submaps. The submaps were co-added, nected to each other by narrower dust filaments. The filamentary
with weighting inversely proportional to the variance, in order structure is seen more clearly on the high signal-to-noise ratio
to obtain the best signal-to-noise ratio. We applied a minor 850 m map (Fig. 2). In the northwest, the continuum emission
pointing correction ( ¼ 2B5, ¼ þ3B4) to the final map follows the boundary of the optical H ii (Fig. 1), which Davis et
by aligning IRS 9 with the Owens Valley Radio Observatory al. (1998) show to be largely void of gas. We see a faint,
(OVRO) position given by van der Tak et al. (2000) before somewhat extended dust condensation southwest of IRS 4
converting it to FITS and exporting it to MIRIAD for further (Fig. 2), but the strongest dust emission is centered on the
analysis. hypercompact H ii region IRS 1. Surrounding IRS 1 is a cluster
The rms noise of the 1.3 mm map is 32 mJy beam1. The of submillimeter sources (Table 1), none of which are associ-
calibration uncertainty is estimated to be 10%. ated with near- or mid-infrared emission, suggesting that they
are in a younger evolutionary state than IRS 1. IRS 9 and NGC
2.4. Image Deconvolution and Source Extraction 7538 S appear more isolated, although there are at least two
In order to better compare the SCUBA 850 and 450 m maps molecular outflows near IRS 9 (Davis et al. 1998), suggesting
with the 1.3 mm IRAM map and the DBMEM-restored UKT 14 that there is more than one young star in the vicinity of IRS 9.
maps, we transferred our data into the MIRIAD image analysis The filamentary cloud structure of the dust emission is
package (Sault, Teuben, & Wright 1995). We then formed similar to what Zheng et al. (2001) see in NH3. In the dust
subimages of the fields around IRS 1, IRS 9, NGC 7538 S, and continuum the filaments show up even more clearly than in
IRS 8, which we cleaned with the MIRIAD task CLEAN. For NH3, which has a more lumpy appearance. The young pro-
the SCUBA data, we fitted two-component elliptical Gaussians tostellar sources IRS 1, IRS 9, and NGC 7538 S all coincide
to the Uranus map obtained the same time and found the beam with spatially resolved dust continuum sources, while NH3 is
profile to be well represented by a two-component Gaussian weak or absent toward IRS 1 and IRS 9. Toward IRS 1, NH3 is
with a main beam of 14B8 14B2 broadened in the scan seen in absorption against the continuum, confirming that
direction (or P:A: ¼ 25 for our NGC 7538 maps) and a 3000 IRS 1 is surrounded by a cold gas. No NH3 emission is seen
error beam, with relative amplitudes of 0.975 and 0.025 for the toward IRS 9. This is presumably due to the chemistry of NH3,
main beam and error beam, respectively. At 450 m the main which often tends to be weak or absent toward young proto-
beam was 8B2 7B8, with an error beam of 3500 and relative stellar sources. A notable exception, however, is the strong
amplitudes of 0.933 and 0.067 for the main beam and the error NH3 emission toward the H2O and OH maser source NGC
beam, respectively. 7538 S, which has the strongest submillimeter continuum
For the IRAM map we assumed a symmetric main beam of emission of all the sources in NGC 7538. As we show below,
1200 and a 12000 error beam, with relative amplitudes of 0.9 and this source is a very young protostar, which may not yet have
0.1 for the main beam and error beam, respectively. This is had time to interact with the surrounding molecular cloud. The
consistent with typical beam profiles measured for the seven- deep search for H2O masers by Kameya et al. (1990) shows
channel bolometer array. that all three major protostellar sources (IRS 1, IRS 9, and
We restored the 850 m data with both a 1200 and a 1400 beam. NGC 7538 S) are associated with H2O masers, but they found
For a strong source like IRS 1 a 1200 beam gave a marginal in addition four new masers, which do not coincide with any
known radio or IR sources. As we show below, all these
masers coincide with dust continuum sources, suggesting that
4
Available at http://www.iram.es/IRAMES/otherDocuments/manuals/ these are all excited by young protostellar sources of relatively
Datared/pockcoo.ps. low luminosity.
272 SANDELL & SIEVERS Vol. 600
TABLE 1
The IRS 1 Submillimeter Cluster
Offseta kb a b P.A. S
Submillimeter Source (arcsec) (m) (arcsec) (deg) (Jy)
3.2. The NGC 7538 IRS 1–3 Region region, which at high angular resolution is resolved into two
radio lobes separated by 0B2 (Turner & Matthews 1984;
NGC 7538 IRS 1–3 were found in a 2.2 and 20 m survey Campbell 1984; Gaume et al. 1995). The hypercompact H ii
of NGC 7538 (Wynn-Williams et al. 1974a), southeast of the region is optically invisible and shows deep silicate absorption
optical H ii region. All three IR sources were found to coincide at 9.7 m (Hackwell, Grasdalen, & Gehrz 1982), corresponding
with a group of compact radio sources first discovered by to a foreground extinction of 60 mag. Campbell (1984)
Martin (1973). IRS 1 dominates at FIR wavelengths, with a suggested that the two radio lobes were part of a north-south
luminosity of 2 105 L (Werner et al. 1979). At radio bipolar ionized outflow collimated by a disk. This was con-
wavelengths IRS 1 is an ultracompact or hypercompact H ii firmed by Gaume et al. (1995), who imaged IRS 1 in the H66
TABLE 2
Positions, Deconvolved Sizes and Integrated Flux Densities of ‘‘Isolated’’ Submillimeter Sources
ka a b Sint
Submillimeter Source (m) (J2000.0) (J2000.0) (arcsec) P.A. (deg) (Jy)
IRS 9 .................................... 1300 23 14 01.68 +61 27 21.8 12.2 7.6 82 0.88 0.09
1100 23 14 01.85 +61 27 22.0 17.8 16.8 ... 1.0 0.15
850S 23 14 01.96 +61 27 20.5 13.7 5.2 82 3.9 0.6
800 23 14 01.81 +61 27 23.7 11.5 9.5 78 3.4 0.7
450S 23 14 01.89 +61 27 20.5 13.0 5.9 77 38.8 9.6
450 23 14 01.73 +61 27 21.6 8.8 8.2 ... 28.3 8.5
IRS 9 S ................................ 1300 23 14 00.50 +61 26 57.3 20.0 13.1 62 0.44 0.04
850S 23 14 00.70 +61 26 54.9 20.0 13.3 +86 1.6 0.3
450S 23 14 00.72 +61 26 56.2 19.9 13.2 35 22.5 5.0
NGC 7538S.......................... 1300 23 13 44.46 +61 26 49.8 14.1 7.1 +56 4.35 0.48
1100 23 13 44.53 +61 26 49.7 21.7 14.3 +51 8.2 1.2
850S 23 13 44.51 +61 26 48.7 13.5 5.8 +58 16.6 1.7
800 23 13 44.68 +61 26 51.4 14.3 8.7 +54 21.1 4.2
450S 23 13 44.55 +61 26 49.4 12.9 6.5 +58 127.1 26
450 23 13 44.57 +61 26 50.3 14.3 7.7 +52 151.1 45
350 23 13 44.81 +61 26 49.4 11.4 9.4 +84 146.8 60
IRS 4 SW............................. 1300 23 13 30.24 +61 29 04.9 10 5 +80 0.32 0.08
850S 23 13 30.42 +61 29 02.6 10 4 +32 1.6 0.2
450S 23 13 30.23 +61 29 03.6 10.2 4 74 8.5 2.1
Note.—Units of right ascension are hours, minutes, and seconds, and units of declination are degrees, arcminutes,
and arcseconds.
a
‘‘S’’ denotes SCUBA filters.
No. 1, 2004 NGC 7538 273
solid angle of the source, s , and the optical depth of the (Sandell 2000), and one therefore needs far-infrared data to
dust, ; i.e., determine the average dust temperature. All far-infrared
measurements of NGC 7538 are obtained with beam sizes on
S ¼ s B ðTd Þð1 e Þ; ð1Þ the order of 10 (Werner et al. 1979; Thronson & Harper 1979),
while the submillimeter sources are at most 1000 in size and
where the dust optical depth can be expressed as a power law surrounded by strong dust emission from the cloud cores in
of frequency, i.e., which they are embedded. We therefore need to correct for the
contribution of extended emission before we can combine the
broad-beam far-infrared data with our high spatial resolution
¼ o : ð2Þ millimeter and submillimeter data. However, since we have
o accurate, well-calibrated maps in the millimeter and submilli-
meter regime, it is relatively straightforward to estimate the
Here o is the dust optical depth at frequency o, and is the contribution of the extended emission if the source is isolated,
dust emissivity index. In the millimeter and submillimeter like NGC 7538 S (see Fig. 5). For a crowded region like the IRS
regime the dust emission is largely optically thin, and we can 1 submillimeter cluster, it is virtually impossible to separate the
therefore assume that s is constant and independent of fre- extended emission from that of the embedded sources, espe-
quency. If we further assume that the bulk of the dust can be cially since we do not even resolve the individual sources at
characterized by a single dust temperature, Td, we can now longer wavelengths (Fig. 3). Since we are only interested in
determine the dust temperature and the dust emissivity by emission from cold dust, which completely dominates the flux
doing a least-squares fit to equation (1). The assumption of a density at long wavelengths, we restrict the far-infrared data to
single dust temperature is clearly unrealistic, since high-mass wavelengths longer than 60 m.
star–forming cores are heated from the inside by a central Another uncertainty in broadband continuum data comes
luminous source. It is not, however, as bad as it may appear from ‘‘pseudocontinuum’’ due to spectral line emission in the
from spherical radiative transfer models (see, e.g., Mueller bandpass. The strongest molecular lines, like the rotational CO
et al. 2002), because most of the dust surrounding these young transitions, are generally widespread and largely cancelled out
high-mass stars is in highly flattened structures, which results by the chopping scheme used, but compact emission from
in lower dust temperatures than predicted from a spherical outflows or molecules excited in the high-density cores will
model (Lefèvre, Daniel, & Bergeat 1983). At least in one case, contribute a nonnegligible continuum level to the true dust
NGC 7538 S, the surrounding dust envelope has been shown continuum. This was investigated by Sandell (2000) for NGC
to be dominated by a massive rotating accretion disk (Sandell, 6334 using narrowband heterodyne photometry in a frequency
Wright, & Forster 2003), while OVRO observations of both band free of line emission and centered at 352 GHz; for a de-
IRS 1 and IRS 9 (van der Tak et al. 2000) show unresolved tailed discussion of these observations, see Sandell (2000). We
dust emission at 3 mm, presumably due to optically thick dust have data for both IRS 1 and NGC 7538 S, obtained on the same
near the young high-mass stars. An optically thick inner dust night (1991 March 30) as the NGC 6334 data. We obtained two
cocoon or dust torus would also reduce the dust temperature sets of photometry with a 6000 azimuth chop throw of both
farther away from the central source. However, even if we sources. The measured flux densities in a 13B3 beam were
take the radiative transfer calculations by Mueller et al. (2002) 12:9 1:0 and 11:0 0:6 Jy beam1 for IRS 1 and NGC
at face value, we find that the dust temperature for a 104 L 7538 S, respectively. Since this narrowband photometry is
central source varies by less than a factor of 2, i.e., from 50 centered on the SCUBA 850 m band, we only need to correct
to 30 K at radii of 100 and 1000 , respectively. This suggest that for the difference in beamwidth, which is easy, since we have a
the uncertainty in dust mass due to our assumption of iso- CLEANed version of the SCUBA map. If we restore the
thermal dust will be less than a factor of 2, which is similar to CLEANed 850 m map with a 13B3 beam, we find peak flux
or smaller than the uncertainty in dust mass opacity. densities of 16.2 and 13.2 Jy beam1 for IRS 1 and NGC
Once the dust emissivity and the dust temperature are 7538 S, respectively, which would indicate a spectral line
known, one can compute the total mass of a submillimeter contamination of more than 20%. However, inspection of the
source from SCUBA 850 m map (see, e.g., Fig. 2), indicates that pho-
3þ tometry with a 6000 chop will pick up at least 0.5 Jy beam1 in
2 1200 the reference beam, and we therefore have to add 0.5 Jy
Mtot ¼ 1:88 10 S e0:048=Td 1 d 2 ; ð3Þ
beam1, possibly more, to both data sets. For these two sources
we therefore find that spectral line contamination is 10%–
where d is the distance in kiloparsecs, S is the total flux at 15%, and derived masses should therefore be reduced by this
frequency , Td and are the fitted dust temperature and amount. However, since this is much less than the uncertainty in
-index, and Mtot is given in units of M. In this equation we dust mass opacity and errors resulting from the assumption of
have adopted the ‘‘Hildebrand’’ mass opacity, o , defined at isothermal dust, which result in a combined mass uncertainty of
250 m (1200 GHz), i.e., 1200 GHz ¼ 0:1 cm2 g1 (Hildebrand at least a factor of 3, we have not corrected for line contami-
1983), and a gas-to-dust ratio of 100. Mueller et al. (2002) find nation. A rigorous treatment of broadband continuum emission
that the tabulated dust mass opacities (OH5) by Ossenkopf & of high-mass star–forming cores will, however, need to correct
Henning (1994) for coagulated dust grains with ice mantles for excess emission due to spectral line contamination.
give the best agreement for the sources they modeled. For
¼ 1, the Hildebrand opacity at 850 m is a factor of 1.6 higher 4.1. The IRS 1 Region
than the OH5 opacity, while it is about half the OH5 opacity for For IRS 1 we can get some constraints on the average dust
¼ 2. temperature and dust emissivity by comparing our millimeter
The dust optical depth and the dust temperature are strongly and submillimeter data with published far-infrared photome-
coupled in the millimeter and submillimeter wavelength regime try. We did aperture photometry of IRS 1 on the CLEANed
276 SANDELL & SIEVERS Vol. 600
1.3 mm and 850 and 450 m maps, with apertures matching most half of the measured 100 m flux density is due to NGC
the beam sizes of the far-infrared data. Unfortunately, these do 7538 S. Our least-squares fit gives Td 35 K and 1:6 and
not match each other at the different wavelengths, and since the suggests that the dust emission is starting to get optically thick
IRS 1 cluster has a diameter larger than 6000 , even relatively at 850 m, with a dust optical depth of 0.1. The mass of
small changes in the aperture size have a relatively large effect NGC 7538 S is 400 M, with a far-infrared luminosity of
on the observed flux density. Werner et al. (1979) give flux no more than 104 L. This is by far the most massive source in
densities at 100 m for a 5500 beam, while Thronson & Harper the whole NGC 7538 molecular cloud. The least-squares fits
(1979) quote photometry at 149 and 87 m with beam sizes of for both IRS 9 and NGC 7538 S are shown in Figure 6.
6000 and 5000 , respectively. We correct for free-free emission
from IRS 1 and IRS 2 by assuming a combined flux density of 5. DISCUSSION
2 Jy at 100 GHz (Akabane et al. 1992), although the contri-
bution from free-free emission is only of the order of 10% at 5.1. NGC 7538 S Is a Class 0 Object: A High-Mass Protostar!
1.3 mm and negligible at shorter wavelengths. Isothermal NGC 7538 S has all the characteristics of a Class 0 object
least-squares fits on different permutations of these data sets (André, Ward-Thompson, & Barsony 1993). It has a dense,
give a dust temperature in the range of 45–55 K, while cold, elliptical core with a mass of 400 M and a radius
is 1.2–1.3. We would expect the IRS 1 submillimeter source of 14,000 AU. The virial mass, assuming an r1.5 density
to be hotter than the other submillimeter sources, because it is distribution and a line width of 4.5 km s1 (Kalenskii et al.
directly illuminated by the ultracompact H ii region. Disks 2000), is only 220 M, suggesting that the core is likely to be
surrounding young stars typically have dust emissivities of the gravitationally unstable and most likely in a state of collapse. A
order of 1, which seems appropriate for IRS 1 as well. If we somewhat steeper radial density distribution, such as r1.8,
adopt ¼ 1, we find that the temperature of the submillimeter which Mueller et al. (2002) found for their high-mass core
source must be less than 80 K; otherwise, IRS 1 becomes too sample, would reduce the virial mass by 13% (MacLaren,
luminous. With a dust temperature of 75 K, the luminosity of Richardson, & Wolfendale 1988). The submillimeter source
the IRS 1 submillimeter source is 9 104 L, and the dust coincides with a faint 6 cm VLA source and OH and H2O
mass 70 M. masers and drives a compact molecular outflow. It has no near-
The masses of the five additional submillimeter sources in or mid-IR counterpart, but it has been detected at 57 m
the IRS 1 core are more uncertain. These sources are likely to (Thronson & Harper 1979). The presence of masers confirm
be colder than IRS 1, and based on the results above a dust that there is a central hot protostar embedded within the massive
temperature of 40 K appears plausible. The dust emissivity is envelope. The bolometric luminosity is quite modest, Lbol
also likely to be somewhat higher. If we adopt ¼ 1:5, the 104 L. A large fraction of this luminosity is radiated in the
least massive source, SMM 4 has a mass of 30 M, while submillimeter. The ratio of submillimeter (i.e., radiation
SMM 1, the most massive one, has a mass of 125 M. shortward of 900 GHz) to bolometric luminosity Lsubmm =Lbol
1:4 102 , which is well above the limit (>0:5 102 )
4.2. IRS 9 and NGC 7538 S
required by André et al. (1993) in their definition of observa-
IRS 9 and NGC 7538 S have similar far-infrared luminosi- tional properties of a Class 0 object.
ties, but the spectral energy distribution (SED) for IRS 9 is NGC 7538 S appears very similar to NGC 6334 I(N), which
rather broad (Thronson & Harper 1979) and similar to that of Sandell (2000) classified as a high-mass Class 0 protostar.
IRS 1, indicating that more than one source contributes to the Both protostars are surrounded by cold envelopes with masses
observed far-infrared flux densities. By contrast, the SED of of 400 M. Both excite OH and H2O masers and drive
NGC 7538 S is quite narrow in the far-infrared, suggesting that molecular outflows, which indicate that they have already
a single source (or dust in a narrow temperature range) formed at least one protostar within their massive envelopes.
dominates the far-infrared emission, which agrees well with our
submillimeter data. For IRS 9 we find that the surrounding
cloud emission completely dominates at long wavelengths:
about 4 times the flux of IRS 9 in a 6000 aperture, while at 450 m
the flux ratio is only about 3. IRS 9 therefore has a steeper SED
than the surrounding cloud core and IRS 9 S, which gets
included in a 5000 –6000 aperture. Fitting our millimeter and
submillimeter data with the Thronson & Harper (1979) data
gives a temperature of 30 K and a dust emissivity of 1.6,
while the Werner et al. (1979) 100 m data suggest a dust
temperature closer to 40 K and a slightly lower dust emissivity,
¼ 1:4. If we assume that half the flux density in the far-
infrared is due to IRS 9, our least-squares fit gives ¼ 2 and
Td 35 40 K, with 35 K corresponding to the data from
Thronson & Harper (1979). This corresponds to a mass for the
IRS 9 disk of 140–170 M and a luminosity of 104 L. If we
adopt a dust temperature Td ¼ 30 K for IRS 9 S, we get the same
dust emissivity, i.e., ¼ 2, which gives a mass of 90 M.
For NGC 7538 S we have only used the 100 m data from
Werner et al. (1979). Here we find that the ratio of integrated Fig. 6.—Graybody least-squares fits to IRS 9 and NGC 7538 S. The fits
were made using only the 1.3 mm IRAM data and the 850 and 450 m
(D ¼ 55 00 ) to compact emission is roughly constant from 1.3 SCUBA data (triangles), and using far-infrared data (also triangles) to con-
mm to 450 m, or 2.1, 2.5, and 2.2 at 1.3 mm, 850m, and strain the fit (see text). Fits including UKT 14 data ( filled squares) give similar
450 m, respectively. It therefore seems safe to assume that at results. IRS 9 has a steeper SED than the cold protostar NGC 7538 S.
No. 1, 2004 NGC 7538 277
NGC 6334 I(N) appears to be surrounded by a larger cloud sources have masses in the range 30–125 M. Four of them
core (D ¼ 1:2 pc) than NGC 7538 S, which is located in a are associated with H2O masers, but none of the H2O masers
crossing point between two filaments and appears more are well centered on the submillimeter source that they are
compact. If we integrate over the brightest part of the filament associated with (Fig. 3). Since H2O masers always coincide
surrounding NGC 7538 S, i.e., an area equivalent to a 6000 with the low- and intermediate-mass stars that excite them, the
circle (0.8 pc), we find that the surrounding cloud has a mass discrepancy in position between the H2O maser and the sub-
of 750 M, corresponding to an average gas density of 4 millimeter source suggests that most of these sources form or
104 cm3. Here we have assumed a dust temperature of 30 K, have formed more than one star. Higher spatial resolution
i.e., that the dust is roughly thermalized with the gas, which observations would probably further resolve some of them
Zheng et al. (2001) found to have a temperature of 25 K. into additional components. All of the submillimeter sources
Therefore, even the surrounding cloud is not that different from are probably undergoing protostellar collapse, each forming
NGC 6334 I(N); both protostellar cores have formed in mas- one or more stars. The IRS 1 cloud core is therefore in the
sive, high-density clouds that are likely to form more than one process of forming a cluster of intermediate-to-high–mass
high-mass protostar. Sandell (2000) found several nearby stars, with the three most massive members, IRS 1–3, all
submillimeter condensations in the NGC 6334 I(N) cloud core, being late O–to–early B stars.
indicating that the cloud core is in the process of forming more
than one star. The cloud surrounding NGC 7538 S is more 6. FILAMENTARY CLOUD STRUCTURE AND GLOBAL
filamentary than the cloud core surrounding NGC 6334 I(N), STAR FORMATION
although the large NGC 6334 molecular cloud shows some The expansion of the H ii region appears to have swept up
remarkable dust filaments. The discovery of an H2O maser in and compressed the surrounding dust cloud. Most of the dust
the dust filament 2500 southwest of NGC 7538 S (Kameya et al. filaments seen in the NGC 7538 molecular cloud, however, are
1990) and several vibrationally excited H2 knots 2000 –3000 east well separated from the H ii region and have formed inde-
of it indicates that the cloud filament is gravitationally unstable pendently. In this respect the NGC 7538 molecular cloud
and in the process of forming more stars. appears similar to most molecular clouds, which all appear to
A follow-up study by Sandell et al. (2003) shows that NGC have a tendency to form filamentary cloud structure (Sandell
7538 S is surrounded by a massive rotating disk, with the 2000). The H ii region may well have triggered the formation
center of symmetry coinciding with the OH and H2O masers of IRS 1–3, which lie at the southern boundary of the H ii
and the 6 cm VLA source. They find that the protostar drives a region in the densest part of the molecular cloud. Farther west
compact bipolar outflow, which is centered on the protostar the cloud is more tenuous, and even though one can see a faint
and perpendicular to the rotating disk. The outflow is young. It dust ridge bounding the expanding ionized gas (Fig. 1), it will
has a dynamical time of <10,000 yr. With the assumption that eventually be dispersed by the H ii region. The dust core IRS 4
the rotating disk is gravitationally bound, they derive an SW (Table 2) could be an exception, since it contains enough
enclosed mass of 40 M within a 500 radius. Sandell et al. mass to form a star, but without temperature and kinematic
(2003) also detected the dust disk in 3.4 mm continuum, with information it is impossible to predict whether the core will
an extent similar to that we see at millimeter and submillimeter collapse or disperse.
wavelengths, but they derive a smaller mass, 100 M. The total cloud mass can be estimated from our submilli-
meter maps. The integrated 850 m flux density over the whole
5.2. The IRS 1 Submillimeter Cluster
area we mapped is 232 Jy. If we exclude the three young
The IRS 1 cloud core is larger and warmer than the cloud high-mass stars IRS 1, IRS 9, and NGC 7538 S, we find a cloud
cores surrounding IRS 9 and NGC 7538 S. The core has an mass of 5500 M, assuming an average dust temperature of
approximate diameter of 7000 (1.2 pc), with a dust temperature 30 K and a dust emissivity of ¼ 1:5. Most of this mass is in
of 40 K. The high dust temperature is partly due to the the three high-mass cores, and the rest is in dense filaments.
proximity of the NGC 7538 H ii region and partly because the Each core has a size of 1 pc and a mass of more than
core is heated by the three young, ultracompact H ii regions 1000 M. This agrees well with the theoretical model put
IRS 1–3. If we assume a dust emissivity of ¼ 1:5, we find a forward by McKee & Tan (2002), who show that high-mass
mass of 1000 M from our 450 m observations. This mass stars form in such high-mass, high-pressure environments. The
estimate is very similar to what Mueller et al. (2002) derive McKee & Tan (2002) model also suggests that high- and low-
from their detailed modeling, 750 M. The core radius, 3500 , mass stars form simultaneously, which appears to be true for
which we define as the equivalent radius at which the NGC 7538 as well. Even though our continuum observations
continuum emission has dropped to 10% of its peak value, is do not go deep enough to detect young stars with a circum-
also very similar to the radius Mueller et al. (2002) derive stellar mass below about 10 M, such young stars or protostars
from their model, 4000 , even though the definitions differ. are likely to be present in all three cores. All three high-mass
Mueller et al. (2002) define their core radius as the radius cores show additional low-luminosity H2O masers or outflows,
inside which the density exceeds a gas density of 104 cm3. which do not coincide with any known IR source or high-mass
Using the average velocity dispersion from van der Tak et al. clump. Most of the H2O masers are close to dense cloud cores,
(2000) and the radial density distribution derived by Mueller suggesting that cores undergo further fragmentation.
et al. (2002), we derive a virial mass of 1400 M, showing
that the cloud core is roughly in virial equilibrium.
However, our high spatial resolution 450 and 350 m We thank Chris Davis for providing us with a FITS image
observations (Fig. 3; x 3.2) show that the IRS 1 cloud core is of his 2.12 m continuum image of the NGC 7538 molecular
breaking up into a number of discrete sources. We identify at cloud. We also thank Osamu Kameya for communicating his
least six submillimeter sources in the cloud core (Table 1), if 6 cm VLA results on NGC 7538 S and IRS 9 and Neal Evans
we include the disk surrounding IRS 1. These submillimeter II for his constructive referee report.
278 SANDELL & SIEVERS
REFERENCES
Akabane, K., Tsunekawa, S., Inoye, M., Kawabe, R., Ohashi, N., Kameya, O., Lefèvre, J., Daniel, J.-Y., & Bergeat, J. 1983, A&A, 121, 51
Ishiguro, M., & Sofue, Y. 1992, PASJ, 44, 421 MacLaren, I., Richardson, K. M., & Wolfendale, A. W. 1988, ApJ, 333, 821
André, P., Ward-Thompson, D., & Barsony, M. 1993, ApJ, 406, 122 Martin, A. H. M. 1973, MNRAS, 163, 141
Argon, A. L., Reid, M. J., & Menten, K. M. 2000, ApJS, 129, 159 McKee, C. F., & Tan, J. C. 2002, Nature, 416, 59
Bloomer, J. D., et al. 1998, ApJ, 506, 727 Minier, V., Booth, R. S., & Conway, J. E. 1998, A&A, 336, L5
Campbell, B. 1984, ApJ, 282, L27 Mitchell, G. F., Maillard, J.-P., & Hasegawa, T. I. 1991, ApJ, 371, 342
Campbell, B., & Thompson, R. I. 1984, ApJ, 279, 650 Moreno, M. A., & Chavarrı́a-K., C. 1986, A&A, 161, 130
Crampton, D., Georgelin, Y. M., & Georgelin, Y. P. 1978, A&A, 66, 1 Mueller, K. E., Shirley, Y. L., Evans, N. J., II, & Jacobson, H. R. 2002, ApJS,
Davis, C. J., Moriarty-Schieven, G., Eislöffel, J., Hoare, M. G., & Ray, T. P. 143, 469
1998, AJ, 115, 1118 Ossenkopf, V., & Henning, T. 1994, A&A, 291, 943
Duncan, W. D., Robson, E. I., Ade, P. A. R., Griffin, M. J., & Sandell, G. 1990, Pratap, P., Batrla, W., & Snyder, L. E. 1989, ApJ, 341, 832
MNRAS, 243, 126 Richer, J. S. 1992, MNRAS, 254, 165
Emerson, D. T., Klein, U., & Haslam, C. G. T. 1979, A&A, 76, 92 Sandell, G. 1994, MNRAS, 271, 75
Forster, J. R., Welch, W. J., Wright, M. C. H., & Baudry, A. 1978, ApJ, ———. 2000, A&A, 358, 242
221, 137 Sandell, G., Wright, M. C. H., & Forster, J. R. 2003, ApJ, 590, L45
Gaume, R. A., Goss, W. M., Dickel, H. R., Wilson, T. L., & Johnston, K. J. Sault, R. J., Teuben, P. J., & Wright, M. C. H. 1995, in ASP Conf. Ser. 77,
1995, ApJ, 438, 776 Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IV, ed. R. A. Shaw, H. E.
Hackwell, J. A., Grasdalen, G. L., & Gehrz, R. D. 1982, ApJ, 252, 250 Payne, & J. J. E. Hayes (San Francisco: ASP), 433
Haslam, C. G. T. 1974, A&AS, 15, 333 Scoville, N. Z., Sargent, A. I., Sanders, D. B., Claussen, M. J., Masson, C. R.,
Hildebrand, R. H. 1983, QJRAS, 24, 267 Lo, K. Y., & Phillips, T. G. 1986, ApJ, 303, 416
Holland, W. S., et al. 1999, MNRAS, 303, 659 Thronson, H. A., Jr., & Harper, D. A. 1979, ApJ, 230, 133
Jenness, T., & Lightfoot, J. F. 1998, in ASP Conf. Ser. 145, Astronomical Data Tielens, A. G. G. M., Tokunaga, A. T., Geballe, T. R., & Baas, F. 1991, ApJ,
Analysis Software and Systems VII, ed. R. Albrecht, R. N. Hook, & H. A. 381, 181
Bushouse (San Francisco: ASP), 216 Turner, B. E., & Matthews, H. E. 1984, ApJ, 277, 164
Johnston, K. J., Sloanaker, R. M., & Bologna, J. M. 1973, ApJ, 182, 67 van der Tak, F. F. S., van Dishoeck, E. F., Evans, N. J., II, & Blake, G. A. 2000,
Johnston, K. J., Stolovy, S. R., Wilson, T. L., Henkel, C., & Mauersberger, R. ApJ, 537, 283
1989, ApJ, 343, L41 Werner, M. W., Becklin, E. E., Gatley, I., Matthews, K., Neugebauer, G., &
Kalenskii, S. V., Promislov, V. G., Alakoz, A. V., Winnberg, A., & Johansson, Wynn-Williams, C. G. 1979, MNRAS, 188, 463
L. E. B. 2000, A&A, 354, 1036 Willner, S. P. 1976, ApJ, 206, 728
Kameya, O., Hasegawa, T. I., Hirano, N., & Takakubo, K. 1989, ApJ, 339, 222 Wynn-Williams, C. G., Becklin, E. E., & Neugebauer, G. 1974a, ApJ, 187, 473
Kameya, O., Morita, K.-I., Kawabe, R., & Ishiguro, M. 1990, ApJ, 355, 562 Wynn-Williams, C. G., Werner, M. W., & Wilson, W. J. 1974b, ApJ, 187, 41
Kawabe, R., Suzuki, M., Hirano, N., Akabane, K., Barsony, M., Najita, J. R., Zheng, X.-W., Zhang, Q., Ho, P. T. P., & Pratap, P. 2001, ApJ, 550, 301
Kameya, O., & Ishiguro, M. 1992, PASJ, 44, 435 Zylka, R. 1998, Pocket Cookbook for the MOPSI Software, MPIf R Internal
Kreysa, E. 1992, in Photon Detectors for Space Instrumentation, ed. T. D. Rep. (Bonn: MPI)
Guyenne & J. J. Hunt (ESA SP-356; Noordwijk: ESTEC), 207