Slide 1 - Highlighting Concerns regarding WHO's Proposed Global Pandemic Accord and

amendments to International Health Regulations

Grievance Registration No.: DHLTH/E/2023/0017989. Lawyers, doctors, and citizens express

deep concern over WHO's 'Global Pandemic Accord' and Amendments to the International
Health Regulations (IHR). The proposed changes signal a significant shift in global health
governance, raising alarms about potential threats to national sovereignty and individual rights.

Slide 2 - Overview of the Accord and IHR Amendments

The 'Global Pandemic Accord,' presented by WHO, encompasses 38 Articles (1st February
2023) and 41 Articles (2nd June 2023). This marks a fundamental change, granting WHO
sweeping powers and extending its influence beyond health to control food and the
environment. The parallel Amendments to the IHR 2005 raise concerns about constitutional
rights and the potential for WHO to declare health emergencies, impacting citizens globally.

Slide 3 - Violation of Fundamental Rights

The 'Accord' and IHR Amendments directly violate fundamental rights, canceling the right to
bodily autonomy and integrity. This represents a breathtaking assault on civil liberties. Notably, it
contradicts India's federal structure, where health is a state subject. The violation of Articles 14,
19, and 21 of the Constitution of India, along with international treaties, raises serious concerns
about the impact on citizens' rights.

Slide 4 - Digital Censorship

The proposed 'Accord' and IHR Amendments pave the way for digital censorship. WHO,
through binding recommendations, can suppress information, including free speech, opposing
its official narrative. This alarming power to control information poses a direct threat to
democratic principles and raises questions about the transparency and accountability of the
global health organization.

Slide 5 - Past Failures of WHO

WHO's track record during the SARS-CoV-2 crisis reveals significant failures. Enforced
lockdowns, economic devastation, and the promotion of unapproved vaccines under EUA have
disqualified WHO from a position of global health authority. Past mistakes, including flawed
RT-PCR tests and conflict of interest, highlight the need for a critical reevaluation of WHO's role
in shaping global health policies.

Slide 6 - Accord and IHR Amendments Threat to National Sovereignty

The 'Accord' and IHR Amendments pose a significant threat to national sovereignty. Granting
unprecedented powers to WHO, including the ability to suspend national governments,
parliament, and constitutions, these instruments challenge the very essence of self-governance.
This potential loss of autonomy raises urgent questions about the impact on the political and
economic fabric of nations.

Slide 7 - WHO Becomes Your Personal Physician

A thought-provoking scenario emerges if the 'Accord' and IHR Amendments are adopted.
WHO's role could extend to becoming a personal physician, dictating individual medical
procedures and decisions. This shift from a global health organization to a personalized health
authority raises concerns about the infringement on individual rights and autonomy, demanding
careful consideration and resistance from citizens worldwide.

Slide 8 - Secrecy of Negotiations for Accord and IHR Amendments

The alarming lack of transparency surrounds the negotiations for the 'Global Pandemic Accord'
and Amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR). The process, conducted behind
closed doors, raises concerns about democratic principles. Unelected representatives from 194
countries negotiate without public scrutiny, leading to potential autocratic decisions that may
impact the lives, health, and rights of individuals globally. The need for openness and
accountability in these crucial negotiations cannot be overstated.