Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Drugs Review Crime Scene Processing

    Uploaded by

    mark angelo arasga
    5 views1 page
    To prove a drug case beyond reasonable doubt, one must establish: (1) the identity of those involved in the sale and the object being sold; and (2) delivery and payment. It is also essential to identify the drugs in court, as failure to do so warrants acquittal of the accused. Proper marking of evidence in the presence of witnesses including the accused, media, Department of Justice, and public officials is necessary but not sufficient, as the presumption of innocence outweighs regularity. Section 25 of Republic Act No. 9165 also requires establishing chain of custody.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    To prove a drug case beyond reasonable doubt, one must establish: (1) the identity of those involved in the sale and the object being sold; and (2) delivery and payment. It is also essential to identify the drugs in court, as failure to do so warrants acquittal of the accused. Proper marking of evidence in the presence of witnesses including the accused, media, Department of Justice, and public officials is necessary but not sufficient, as the presumption of innocence outweighs regularity. Section 25 of Republic Act No. 9165 also requires establishing chain of custody.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views1 page

    Drugs Review Crime Scene Processing

    Uploaded by

    mark angelo arasga
    To prove a drug case beyond reasonable doubt, one must establish: (1) the identity of those involved in the sale and the object being sold; and (2) delivery and payment. It is also essential to identify the drugs in court, as failure to do so warrants acquittal of the accused. Proper marking of evidence in the presence of witnesses including the accused, media, Department of Justice, and public officials is necessary but not sufficient, as the presumption of innocence outweighs regularity. Section 25 of Republic Act No. 9165 also requires establishing chain of custody.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    IT IS ESSENTIAL TO PROVE BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT THE FOLLOWING:

    1. Identity of the buyer, seller and the object of the sale;


    2. Delivery of the thing sold and its payment.

    THE IDENTITY OF THE DRUGS NEEDS TO BE ESTABLISHED IN COURT. FAILURE TO DO


    SO WARRANTS THE ACQUITTAL OF THE ACCUSED.

    1. Does Marking sufficient?


    The presumption of regularity should not prevail over the presumption of
    innocence. Hence, the procedure must be observed.
    Mark the evidence in the presence of witness
     Accused or representative or counsel; and
     Representative from the Media
     Representative from the DOJ
     Any elected public official

    2. Section 25, R.A. No. 9165


    Chain of custody in drug cases.

    You might also like