Professional Documents
Culture Documents
.
.,' '-/J
::: 1- .
~;'"..",.. j;,~E
~
/r '
J/ . ~~.
/---
"t:J ""'
',"""-
....
. /11. "o\\"
,-~
F
/"""'
'--1
/"r~~i:r1:G\
) \ j
"
". 'i //
.) National International
~
- :i..-r
,;i
;'
::::
',' ..i.~'
. ,I
. 1;
~ - Advisory Board Advisory Board
~~ ;
/ .". ~~~ ~ ~
~/, .
J/ ~1IiJIJ!!I!Ja"'-"'
"i~~"""
.
iLi ,~i\\ Abdul Hamid AI-\hihana Abdulla Borhan Eg\pi
Abdul-Reda Lari A. R. ~:Joossa [,SA
Basil AI-Nakib
Eric Stroud England
Editor-In-Chief G. R. Leons Frank Johnstone Scotl(//1(1
"-\bJul Rahman AI-A\\"adi Hussein Dashti Geoffrey Chisholm Sii'ir:.erlaiid
H.R. Fantania Host Zincke USA
\Iedical Sciences Editor Jawad Behbehani Howard A. Pearson USA
Kamel EI-Reshaid J.P. Madda ibrahim Badran Egypi
Kc. Aboobacker Jose V. Trantelj Yiigoslm'ia
Associate Editors Kasim AI-Sakh John David Williams England
John O. Forfar ScOlliind
..\bdulla Behbehani LV. Devarajan
J.R. Oster USA
.-\hmed AI-Shatti Mansour Sarkhou
M.R. Al Fagih Sol/di Arabia
Da\iJ Wright Mohamed AI-Ghanim
M. El Gendi Egypr
Saleh AI-Kandari Mohamed A. Aref
M. K Abdul Khalik Egypt
M. Refaat Hassanein
Martin Allgower Sii'ir:.erliind
Editorial \Iana~er Moustafa AI-Dosouky Miraslav Opric Yiigoslm'Üi
Sami AI-Sharka\\y Mubarek AI-Ajmi O. Conor Ward Ireliind
M. AI-Tamami Rashad Barsoum EgylJt
Arabk Translation Muhamad Khalid Nawaz Robert Resnik USA
AC\IL L-\rab Centre for Ma'asomah Makhseed Robert F. Harrison Irelaiid
\leJical Literature) Kim"ait M.AI-Bader Stig Bengmark Sireden
~
\'~iiL-t
~
-/r ~'"'~
"'/ ','-
dlji ~O\\'
.
~~ E
.
Origina[ .9Lrticfe
In this stud)!,we tried to determine efficacy of indomethacin, a prostaglandin synthesis inhibitor, with
a tricyclic antidepressant imipramine together in the treatment of primary nocturnal ennresis. This
study included 78 patients with primary nocturnal enuresis (PNE) living in the same environmental
and social condition. Imipramine (50 mg per night) and indomethacin (25 mg per night) was
adminisifred during 8 weeks. At the end of this time, medical therapy W3Sgradually finished and
dryness was followed-up. We concInde that indomethacin is a good alternatiye agent for nocturnal
enuresis particularly as a supplementary treatment combined with imipramine, with 78.6% complete
response and 74.7% dryness rate.
The Journal ofThe KlIwail Medkal Ass()i:iaiinn '279 Scptcmt>..., 199(, Volumc 2X No..'
Nur~dJin Vurgun. Bilali H Gumus. .-\kin Is~an. :\hisiaf;i Y~I~r. S~rJar Tarhan. S~(bi Gon~nc
JIl
Patients and Methods
! D Before treatment We applied this study to children
'"
.!:!
251 Q .p<lJ
001 !L !§1After"...,, treatment ..- i
staying in the boys' dormItories of the
o; Society for Protection of Children
5 lO and Social Services and the children
ii
.... 15 who had noctumal enuresis and came
o
...
... to Celal Bayar University Hospita!
J:> 10
E between the dates November 1994
Z 5 and February !996. The age s of the
78 children were between 9 to 15
(i (Mean :t SO: 12.3:t 1.8) and they
Imipramine+ Indomethacin Imipramine Placebo were not previously treated at ali. We
Indome:thacin HCl separated the children who had
primary noctumal enuresis at random
into four groups ( Table i) and
Fig. 2: The eases in the group of imipramine plus indonietha,'in eontinued to stay dry more ihan the others about collected all the detai!ed information
three monihslat<rafter w<had linishedthetreatm<niIp> o.onil. The ,nh<rgroups.whoprovidedeure afier the about the urination and medical
treatment did not have any superioriiy to each "ther froni the point of the ,ase number Ip> 0.05 i.
history of all children. We made
The: Journal ni' The Kuwaii Me:Jical Assnciaiion 280 September 19% Yolume 2X No-,
A Pn"la~landin Synihöi, InhihilOr: Indol11cihai'in and 1l11ipral11inein ih~ Tr~all11enl of Pril11ar~ ""ctum:i! Enur~sis
routine physical examination of the groups ip > 0.05 i. We saw a pliarmacoJogieaJ agents Iias heen
ineluding abdominal. pehic. exierna] considerable decrease in ihe el1lployed from sed aii ve s to
genitalia and neurological bedwetting scores al the end of ihe siimulani or sympathomimetic
examination. The first morning urine 4 weeks of the trealment with drugs agents Ihl:. Different methods have
was taken for complete analysis of vs. placebo. Bed wening scores be en tried besides ihese
urine from these children. We decreased in all drug groups that is pharmaeo]ogical treatments. The
analyzed the density of urine. in IMP and IND groups in ihal order. behavior change treatment methods
searched for glucose and protein. and but'more obviously in the IMP + IND i behavioral therap)'. bladder
looked for cells and the casts groups (p < 0.001). This deerease exercises) psychotherapy. diel
microscopically. We a]so analyzed was provided by IMP at the same therapy. electro-acupuncture and
the serum e]ectro]yte. BUN. the rale as for the IND group (p < 0.05 I. hypnosis are the main methods
fasting b]ood sugar of the cases. \Ve bui there was a significant decrease among them 11.'-1"1. According to the
examined the patients by the direct in IMP+IND group compared with p]acebo results. only imipramine
urinary radiogram and tested the X- all other groups (p < 0.005). Ai the which is a tncydic antidepressant.
ray film for uro]ithiasis. bone end of the 10ih week. while the became part]y superior among the
deformities and we noted whether bedwetting frequency was medical treatment methorls. Apart
there were urinary system anomalies decreasing in all groups. we saw a from these medical agents an
or not. by performing urinary statistically significant increase in anticho]inergic agent (oxybutynin)
ultrasonographic and intravenous the group taking only IMP (p = and antidiuretic hormone
urogram evaluations. Patients who 0.005). The use of IMP+IND vs. only desmopressin (DDAYP) have also
had abnormal physical and IND showed no significant been emp]oyed 111.171.In the treatment
neurological findings and also difference by the end of the i Oth of enuresis. many drugs were used
abnormal urination functions were week (p > 0.05). Bui when we cam e a]one but a]so combined v,'ith other
excluded from the studyo We gave to the end of the treatment. the agents or with other methods iiI.I~I.
imipramine (50mg/day) and increase in the bedwetting score of The mechanisms of the effect of the
indomethacin (25mg/day) to patients the IMP group was less than placebo tricyc]ic antidepressants in the
for two months, and gave only starch (p = 0.026). but not different from treatment are not known exact]y.
capsules as placebo to the control only IND (p > 0.05). The score of However it is suggested that
group 30 minutes before going to bed staying dry. when using IMP+IND imipramine exerts its effect by
every evening. We asked our patients was more than for children using making some changes in the
to inform us conceming their 'dry' only IMP (p < 0.007). The great mechanism of s]eepiness and
and 'wet" nights. When the study and bedwetting score that was seen at the wakefulness. and by having an
control groups started to take the beginning in the group given anticholinergic effect. The treatment
medical agents, we scored their daily IMP+IND diminished considerably with imipramine shows its effect in
dryness according to their dry (74.7%) by the end of the treatment. approximately 50% of the enuretic
situations (dry=ü. a little wet = I, very Af ter the treatment was finished, the children especially in the first week
wet =2) iili.At the end of 8 weeks we cases given only IMP and only IND and is successful at the 30-50% rate
reduced imipramine and could not maintain the rate of staying i 1.151. In the enuretic cases it can be
indomethacin medication to one day dry. obtaining in the first 4th and said that urinating in the bed happens
in a week and then we completely 8th week. So treatment with IMP or during REM sieep; the
stopped them in the i 5th week of the IND alone produced higher relapse antidepressant agents decrease the
treatment. The children in the control rates than that of IMP+IND ( Fig. I). amount of deep sieep. However.
and study group were generally in the The exact treatment rates obtained at recent studies do not show any
same social environment and they the evaluations of 3 months later af ter connection between the depth of
were fed with similar foods. For the finishing the treatment were: placebo s]eep and noeturna] enuresis 117.1"1.
statistical analysis. the unpaired 1/17 i5.9lk). IMP4/19 (21.llk), IND Although it is suggested that
studentfs t-test and chi-square test 5/1 4 (35. 7lk). IMP+IND 22/28 imipramine pmvides an increase in
were used. A 'p' value of less than t78.6lk) (Fig. 2). We did not the b]adder capacity with its
0.05 was considered siatistically encounter any side effects when anticholinergic and antispasmodie
significant. using the two drugs together. Wl' did effects 115_~"1. In our studyo treatment
not have any medical problem to with imipmmine aleme is not seen as
Results indieate stopping the treatment and completely effective in the
The number ofhedweiiing events the patients were ple~ised wiih their management of noctuma] enuresis.
was approximaiely 4 days i range: treatment. Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) which
2-0 days) in a week in the study and is primarily formed in ihe renal distal
conlrol gwlIps. Ai ihe heginning Discussion tubules and in ihe colleclor cana]
ihere were no differenees hL'1ween In ihe treatment of PNE. a very epiilielia. is etrective in ihe ibnsporl
the averagcs of the hcdweiiing. scores exicnsi,'e spei.trum of the of waler and salt. PGE2 inhihits
The Journal ofThc Kuwaii Ml'ui,al Asso,i;iii,ni 2~1 Sl'PIL'ni"'-'r i 'NI> V..luin.. ~~ 1\]" ~
:'IIiir,'ddili Vurguii, Bilali H GUlliu" .-\~iii I',':in, \hi,iara Yei"", Serdar Tarhan. Seda! GIIlleli,
adenyl eydase from enliector cana! REFERENCES: rt."I' l1ol'luni:.. At.'upulll'1 Elct.'iroiher Rt.',
eclis related to vasnpressin and PGE2 IYXlJ: 14: 211.21:'.
has diuretie effects due to its 17. Miller K. Ail..il1 B. \Ioody \-tL. Drug therap~
antagonism of vasopressin, Hence, i. :-':mi:llii AC ;\lmellii JR. Eiiure,i,. Pt.'u Clin
!(Jr nol'tlIrnalenuresi,. Cum:ni ire:itmen( rec.
the usage of prostaglandin synthesis :-':ii...h Am IlJX7: .q 7IlJ.73.~. oniniel1uaiiolh. Drug' 1':1':12:44: 47.56.
inhibitors may antagonize the se 2. Helblr"m AL. Hal1""11 E. Hal1""n S.
iX. Sukh:ii R:-':. \-Inl J. Harri, AS. Comhin,'d
effeets and may bring aoout the Hjalina, K. 'i"uall'. \li,.turaiion hahih anu
iherapy or enure,i, alarni anu de'ITIoprc"in
fnrmation of less urine. According il1nintil1t.'I1t.'t.'in 7 ~t.'ar "lu Swt.'ui,h "choo!
in the (reatmt.'ni of not.'lurnal t.'nure,i,. Eur J
to this hypothesis. PGE2 is t.'ntranh. Eur J Pt.'diatr IlJ':i(): I.N:.G4-,G7.
Pediatr 19S9: 14S:46:'-4b7.
natriuretie and as an inhibitor of 19. Kale, A. Kak, JM, Jawb,on A. Humphrey
.l Alon US. :-':ociumal t.'nuresis. Peuiair Nephrol
eyclo-oxygenase causes retention of 1995: 9: 94-103. FJ. Sold:i(o, CR. Effect of imipramine on
sodium and water. The deereLIse in enureiic frt.'queney and sleep stages.
4. Mar~ SD. Frank JD. :-':ociumal enuresi". Br J
prostaglandin formation by using Urol 1995: 75: 427-434.
Pediairics t 977: 60: 431-435.
indomethacin increases vasopressin 5. Rushion HG. Not.'ium:il t.'nuresis: Epidemi-
20. Forsythe W i and Redmond A. Enurt.',i, and
activity and consequently inereases 'ponianeous curt.' rale. Study or 1129
ology. t.'\:iluaiion and t.'urrently av:iilable
the urine osinolality. In the normal enureiics. Areh Dis Chill! 1974: 49: 259-263.
ire:iimeni opiions. J Pediair 1989:
subjects, indomethaein as a 21. Rubinger D. W:ild H. Seherzer P. Popo\'!zer
l+i(suppl): 691-69b.
prostaglandin synthesis inhibitor. 6. J:inknegi RA, Smans AJ. Tremmeni wiih
MM. Renal sodium handling and stimulanion
increases reabsorption of Sodium of meduHary Na-K-ATPase during blockade
desmopres,in in severe nocium:il enuresis in
and decreases its excretionl~"~"I. In of prostaglandin synihesis. Prosiaglandins
childhood. Br J Urol 1990: 66: 535-537.
this study, we thought that sodium 7. Anderson RJ. BenT. ;\olcDonald KD. Evidence
1990: 39: 179-194.
excretion may be higher in enuretic for an in vivo anlagonism beiween vaso-
22. Prescon LE Maiiison P. Menzies DG,
cases and indomethacin may increase Manson LM. The comp:irati\'e effects of pa-
pressin and prosiaglandin in iht.' m:immalian
Sodium reabsorption with the racet:imol :ind indomeihacIn on renal func-
kidney. J Clin In\'esl 1975: 56: 420-426.
inhibitory effect prostaglandin 8, W:ilker RM. Brown RS. Sloff JS. Role of re.
tion in helthy fem:ile volunteers. Br J Clin
synthesis and consequently that will Pharniacol 1990: 29: -i03-4 i 2.
nal prosiaglandin's during antidiuresis and
be effeeiiye in the night urinating of w:iier diuresis in m:in. Kidney ini 1982:
23. Monn E. Prosiaglandin syntheiase inhibiiors
enuretic casesl~.ii.The cases of our in the treatment of nephrogenie diabetes in-
21 :365-370.
study responded to the therapy of sipidus. Acta Paediatr Scand 1981: 70: 39-
9. \Ieiin A. Akyol N. Diclofen:ie sodium sup-
prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors in 42.
posiiory in iht.' tre:itmeni of primary noetur-
a short time. At the end of 15 weeks 24. Vurgun N. Gumu. B. Ari- Z: lsean A. Yeter
n:il enuresis. ini Erol :-':t.'phrol 1992: 24: 113-
of treatment, 78.6Cff of the cases 117.
M. Rt.'nal Functions of Enurt.'iic and
managed to stay dry without 10. Baiislam E. :-.ruhoglu B. Peskireioglu lo Emir
~onenurt.'tic Children: Hypt.'matriuria :ind
relapsing (Fig, 2). In some of the Kaliuresis :is Causes of Noeiurnal Enuresis.
lo UygurC. Germiy:inoglu C. Erol D. Apros-
cases given indomethacin. we also European Urology (in print).
t:iglandin syntht.',is inhibitor. diclofen:it.' so-
observed an increase in sweating to dilim in ille treatment of primary noclurnal
according to the pretreatment period. t.'nuresis, Acla Urol Belg 1995: 63: 35-38.
As a consequence of our observation. ii. Wille S. PrimaT)' not.'iurnal enuresis in t.'hil-
we thought that indomethacin effects
drt.'n. Background and treatment. ScanJ Uro!
sweat glands and increases sweating,
Nephrol Suppl 1994: 156:1-49.
so it decreases renal water and salt
12. Khosroshahi HE. Bozkurt V. Sadikglu N.
excretion. In conclusion, we
Alakan C. Treatment of noctumal enure,is:
suggested that the treatment of
a plaeebo-conrolled trial ""iih piract.'tam.
nocturnal enuresis with imipramine
dipht.'nylhyuantoin and psychother:ipy. Turk
and indomethacin is together more J Pt.'diatr 1':189: 31: 215-220.
effective than monotherapy due to 13. Howe Ac. Walker CE. Bt.'h:ivior;11
having different mechanisms. After
nianagmt.'ni of ioilet iraining. enuresi,. anD
we stopped the treatment with ~neopresi,. Pediair Clin :-.rorth Am 1992:
IMP+IND the relapsing rate 39: 413-432.
decI'eLlsedconsiderably over those of 14. \IotTan \IE. :-':ot.'lUmalt.'nure,is: p,ychologi-
the other agents. In this study we
cal implications of trt'alment and non Ireal-
suggest that imipramine and mt.'nt. J Pt.'dialr 1989n 114esuppl): 697- 704.
indomethacin are effeetive and eheap 15. Selimin BD. :-':oeturnal t.'nure,i,. An upd:ite
treatment modalities instead of an
on treatment. Pediair Ci in :'I:orth Am 1982:
alarming method. which is effective 29:21-36.
but has an application dirrichIlyo and 16. Tuzuner E Kedk Y. üzdemir S. Canakei-:-':.
~xpensive DDAYP treatments.
Ekt.'iro-acupunt.'turt.' in the treatment of t.'nu-