Are you struggling with the daunting task of writing a thesis on Jack the Ripper? You're not alone.

Crafting a comprehensive and compelling thesis on such a complex and enigmatic figure requires
extensive research, critical analysis, and exceptional writing skills. From poring over historical
documents to analyzing various theories and interpretations, the process can be overwhelming and
time-consuming.

The intricacies involved in unraveling the mystery of Jack the Ripper demand meticulous attention to
detail and a deep understanding of the socio-cultural context of Victorian England. Moreover,
presenting original insights and arguments that contribute meaningfully to the existing body of
knowledge adds another layer of challenge.

In the face of such daunting obstacles, seeking assistance from experts can be a wise decision. At ⇒
HelpWriting.net ⇔, we understand the challenges that students face when tackling complex topics
like Jack the Ripper. Our team of experienced writers specializes in crafting high-quality theses that
meet the highest academic standards.

By entrusting your thesis to us, you can benefit from:

1. Expertise: Our writers possess advanced degrees in relevant fields and have a wealth of
experience in conducting research and writing academic papers.
2. Originality: We prioritize originality and ensure that each thesis is meticulously researched
and tailored to meet your specific requirements.
3. Timeliness: We understand the importance of meeting deadlines. With our efficient writing
process, we deliver high-quality theses within the agreed-upon timeframe.
4. Confidentiality: Your privacy is our priority. We guarantee complete confidentiality and never
disclose your personal information to third parties.

Don't let the challenges of writing a thesis on Jack the Ripper overwhelm you. Take advantage of our
professional writing services at ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ and embark on your academic journey with
confidence.
Like Source C, B also mentions the skill and knowledge used in the murder, and suggests it was pre-
planned as no meaningless action was taken; it recognises that the murderer had surgical knowledge
as is implied in C. Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave
some feedback. The source tells us that the man Annie was seen talking to was “shabby genteel”. In
my opinion, this was a pathetic fault in their enquiry and the evidence was used as a weak excuse to
target the working class foreigners. In comparison to the common murders of the time, they appeared
motiveless as no money was taken, leading the murders to be feared further as well as inexplicable.
Social Posts Create on-brand social posts and Articles in minutes. This was a key reason in why Jack
the Ripper was not caught. The first detectives were appointed in 1842 so the detective department
was in its infancy when Jack the Ripper struck. The leaflet is also asking for possible witnesses or
suspects to come forward and give any information about the murders. The Mile End Committee
rioted against the police because they weren’t doing enough to catch the ripper. Their were many
distractions such as people writing hoax letters to the police claiming that they were the ripper. We
can learn from this statement that the victims weren’t robbed so the Police cannot suggest a motive
just yet so the murderer must have had another motive that is currently unknown. It could have
helped with the Ripper case and could have been used as evidence. If there were any slight
adjustments to his plans, he may have been caught and I would not be writing this essay. However,
people grew to appreciate the police when crime levels decreased and people began to feel safer.
Keep reading if you want to learn more about this mysterious, and perhaps nonexistent, murderer of
19th century London. It is likely that she too would have been mutilated if the killer had not been
disturbed. Am telling you man this writer is absolutely the best. ”. Their was no means of work
except from prostitution which came in vast amounts, quality of accommodation was poor. Michael
Ostrog, a Russian-born multi-pseudonymous thief and confidence trickster, believed to be 55 years
old in 1888, and detained in asylums on several occasions. Most of the time the media were
sensationalizing of how the murders took form. A post mortem discovered that her uterus had been
removed aswell by the murderer. This caused a lot of tension and excitement for the public. They
didn't have no police which meant no forensics and therefore they didn't have CID. His name was
also mentioned by Chief Inspector John George Littlechild in his letter, which was later dubbed the
Littlechild Letter, in response to a previous one by G. R. Sims, to be a very likely suspect in
connection with the Whitechapel murders (“The Littlechild Letter”). Whereas source C just describes
the body of the dead, for example stating that the “left hand, lying on the ground, was partially
closed, and contain a small packet of cachous” without inferring anything. They also didn't know
how to use the information they were given usefully. 4) Study Sources F and G Use Sources F and
G, and your own Knowledge, to explain how the police tried to catch Jack the Ripper. The best you
could get was one bedroom sleeping on the floor. The source describes how people demanded that
the police force be strengthened to try and create some kind of order on the streets at night, and to
try and put a stop to the murders. Random and normally innocent names we’re put forward into the
papers of people that the public thought was the murderer, resulting in panic and innocent men being
put in jail, even Prince Albert, the queens son.
This was thought because when Martha Tabram and Emma Smith were attacked they were both
prostitutes. Sources A, H and E highlight how malice the media were to the police, “The excess
effort apparent in each murder suggests the idea that both crimes are the work of a demented being
as the extraordinary violence used is the peculiar feature in each instance”, source E “My informant
demanded at that time that the police force on the spot should be strengthened and some kind of
order created on the streets by night. They claim that offering a reward would be a useless method to
find the killer. However, the crime levels did decrease with the help and commitment of the police.
This suggests that if the women had the same distinct cuts along the throat, on the same night, within
a hundred meter radius of each other, the murderer must have stroke twice in the same night. Source
E also implies that the police were ignorant towards the public. The article makes the police force
look as if they are not doing their jobs of police officers seriously and also the article is blaming the
police force of not keeping the streets of Whitechapel safe enough for people to live. There was one
police station to each area of London, different police stations did not descuss crimes in different
areas of London. By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy
policy. They wanted the public to think of the police as not doing their jobs and they also made it
seem that the police were backing off the ripper to see when the next murder occurred. It focuses on
the deaths of Polly Nicholls and Annie Chapman around a month after Chapman was murdered. He
warned that murder would ensue if matters were left as they were. Also, the witness may have held
a grudge against the police, so deliberately gave disinformation to them. The police did what they
could at the time, they did house to house inquires, they would call a doctor to the scene of the crime
to investigate the victim for any clues into finding the Ripper. The article talks of the inhumane
condition of these neighbourhoods and the evil in the streets, lanes and alleys; the article uses
exaggerated phrases and criticises the police force greatly. Even with the way the victims were
murdered, the attention to the murders was exacerbated by the role of the media as they publicised
the news out to all the public. Add Links Send readers directly to specific items or pages with
shopping and web links. Another way is that police would put more patrols on the streets to limit the
rippers escape route. As the case was passed on, there could have been vital information brushed
away by another detective who could have thought that something else was more important. The
police could have been loosing vital witnesses because they did not think of this. The bodies were
then mutilated and eviscerated on different degrees. These were the first murders like this, so with
no information, how could the police catch him. It made it harder that the murders were struck in
Whitechapel, which is a maze of alleys and runways there was a lack of lighting facilities at night
with gaps. Unless she had went close to him and closely examined his skin complexion. The attacks
were at night so there was no clear description of the killer and the police were not popular at the
time, many people loathe them at the time. Why were the police unable to catch Jack the Ripper?
Also this suggests that the killings may have been in hard to reach places for the police. Newspapers
emphasized the gruesome murders, making them sound a hundred times worst and the public clung
to every word, fascinated with the crime. Its purpose is to inform us about the location of the
murders and also give information about any person you find suspicious. Resources Dive into our
extensive resources on the topic that interests you.
The third victim was to be Elizabeth Stride, a 44 year old prostitute and her vagina hadn't been
touched, maybe because he was disturbed. They increased the number of police on the streets which
did not work. It also heavy depicts the gruesome amount of violence that was present, due to this
fact and no clear motive the paper suggest that the killer is a “demented being”. Another reason was
the amount of women being killed by Jack, there was no serial killer recorded before in history, so
this was all new to the citizens of London. Usually. The crimes were quite petty but was mainly due
to their status. I think this inference was published for publicity and sales showing that the press also
hindered the police investigation making it even harder to catch Jack the Ripper by following
genuine leads. If there were any slight adjustments to his plans, he may have been caught and I
would not be writing this essay. Elizabeth Long claims that she saw Annie Chapman talking to a
dark complexioned man at 5:30. The false information could be because the HS was isolating itself
from poor practice, or the police force was violating the HS’ laws. Ultimately this source is
adequately useful in helping us to understand why the Ripper was able to avoid arrest. It is also
thought that the Ripper was a local person because he always escapes minutes before a police arrive
at the scene and he was never caught, which meant he knew the area of Whitechapel very well.
Source J is a photograph of the site where Annie Chapman died. Using nuclear magnetic resonance,
another Liverpool John Moores University scientist, Dr. Fyaz Ismail, determined that the fabric’s age
predated the 1888 murders and was likely made near St. The smog made it hard to see and the poor
lighting at night didn’t help. The police had only had a basic training and law and enforcement had
only started to come into action. Aside from theft, there were other crimes as well like rape, murder,
violence garrotting and manslaughter. So, Source A and B are alike in the respect that they were both
written at about the same time but that’s about it. Jack the Ripper made history, being Britain’s first
serial killer not to be caught. This helps to comprehend why it was easy for the Ripper to get away.
Jack the Ripper - How and why did he evade capture? It is telling the reader the skill that the
murderer had. The problem with source D and most of the description of the Ripper is very vague,
she often. I think that the police were not to blame for not capturing Jack the Ripper. In Source G
written by the Home Secretary to the Mile End Vigilance on 17 th Sept. 1888, states that they
weren’t giving rewards out for information which dramatically reduced the chances of capturing
Jack. Seeing they may have followed this statement given by Elizabeth Long, the police were just
getting further and further away from catching the ripper. The distinguishing feature of his costume
is a leather apron, which he always wears. Though these practices were not most advanced, they
potentially portrayed the police with much evidence. Our tours are led by our local guides, and
they’re sure not to disappoint. From the dead victims known to the police they were all prostitutes,
and with 1 in 5 women being prostitutes in North London, quite alot women were at great risk of
falling to be his next victim. All in all, Whitechapel was a seedy and dangerous area.
Source A’s attempts to glamorise the murders bends the truth slightly, and doesn’t support the
evidence on Source C. The article tells us that there was an “excess of effort” meaning that there was
some form of cruel behavior imposed upon the victims but the source does not tell us what kind of
brutality they received. Lombroso theory, suggested that criminals had certain physical features, a
practice which may have been used lazily at the time. Most of the time the media were
sensationalizing of how the murders took form. Annie Chapman’s body was lying against the fence
with her head on the step. Source A uses attentive vocabulary, Source C is very official ad
informative. Source B make a judgment about who the murderer is because it quotes, “No mere
slaughter of animals could have carried out these operations.”, but this statement is bias because the
coroner is suggesting that the murderer must have some medical knowledge to kill in this precise
way. Newspapers in Victorian times wanted people to buy them so they exaggerated stories and
maybe even exaggerated the article used in source E. Seeing they may have followed this statement
given by Elizabeth Long, the police were just getting further and further away from catching the
ripper. As the killer struck randomly and only met his victims by chance made it harder for the police
in 1888. However, there are many reasons to contradict this. However some chose not to get
involved as there was a lack of reward, so the people thought it was safer not to. Elizabeth Stride
murder was thought to have been interrupted. The region of Poland where Kosminski was born was
under Russian control, and it would not have been unusual for Russian goods to have been traded
there. “I’ve spent 14 years working on it, and we have definitively solved the mystery of who Jack
the Ripper was,” Edwards told London’s Independent newspaper. “Only non-believers that want to
perpetuate the myth will doubt. A lot of witnesses came forward but most of the information that
they gave were vague, unreliable or misleading. The degeneration theory was a belief of the time;
therefore the police may have unintentionally made references to it. If the Ripper had commited a
murder in another area of London away from Whitechappel the police of the Whitechappel area
would not have known about it. The source says “my informant was referred from one police office
to another, but without making any impression”. Offering a reward also may have helped because the
victims (Prostitutes) may have set a trap of their own to lure the ripper into. It is trying to give a
sense to the person reading it that the police are unreliable and untrustworthy, “He was referred from
one police office to another, but without making any impression.” This shows how unreliable and
negative the police were to the public. This quote also shows how careless the police were in
monitoring the public. Source C is the report of Dr. Fredrick Blackwell on the corpse of Elizabeth
Stride. Mylett, who was not even murdered according to the Assistant Commissioner Robert
Anderson, was probably strangled by a client. The attacks were at night so there was no clear
description of the killer and the police were not popular at the time, many people loathe them at the
time. McKenzie's wounds indicated yet a different killer. Unless she had went close to him and
closely examined his skin complexion. Also the brutality of the murders, The Ripper always acted at
night, so it would have been difficult for witnesses to give detailed descriptions of him. It says that
the police were told they needed more police officers on the streets even before the first murder but
still didn't do anything after the first murders. It could have helped with the Ripper case and could
have been used as evidence. This may have been great evidence to use in the ripper case, but people
were scared to give witness accounts in fear of they could be the next victims of the ripper.
Newspapers in Victorian times wanted people to buy them so they exaggerated stories and maybe
even exaggerated the article used in source E. Source B is part of a coroner’s report of the death of
Polly Nicholls. No one could be trusted in Whitechapel, everyone was a suspect. Most of the time
the media were sensationalizing of how the murders took form. Unfortunately, Jack the Ripper was
not convinced by the police’s effort. It was never worn or washed as the search for one of the
world’s most notorious killers grew colder and colder. This caused confusion to the police because
they did not know when it was real and when it was a bunch of people writing in for a laugh. They
focused on the witnesses and took them seriously, which they shouldn’t have done as there were
several witnesses all with different descriptions of the Ripper. Source B also divorces the idea of the
Martha Tabrum and Polly Nicholls murders being linked, which the East End Observer suggests.
Popular and lengthy inquests were held by Coroner Wynne Baxter on the victims falling under his
jurisdiction, which was the majority of them, and he fuelled the press coverage to fever pitch. In the
letter, the supposed killer claimed that the victim’s ear would be cut off, and Eddowes was found
without her ear. It states that the murders were 'cunningly' planned and that 'not a trace was left of
the murderer'. She uses words like “I think”, “ as far as I could tell”, “I cannot be sure” and “he
seemed”. Firstly, it’s not original or eye-catching; secondly it doesn’t consider the high percentage of
illiterate or uneducated people in the Whitechapel area. Sources B and C agree with each other
because they are both first hand primary evidence from reports on the Ripper’s murders written by
professionals. Detailed plans are drawn and Victorian census returns and post office directories are
consulted. It tells us that dispite warnings of how dangerous the area and perople of Whitechappel
were the police did not take any action into preventing violence and even murder in the area. For
example, the police used to call out the time at regular intervals and even light the street lamps as it
became dark. In some aspects they explain different reasons of how the Ripper was able to avoid
captue but neither are entrily trustworthy. However in her evidence she is in doubt a few times. They
sensationalised the case by their choice of words. In the mid-1890s, a witness identified him as the
person attacking one of the victims but refused to testify. Police interviewed various lodgers,
collecting much information. This makes it scary too as there is no motive involved. In this artcle the
police are being blamed for the Ripper getting away with such brutal murders. This quote also shows
how careless the police were in monitoring the public. There was a lack of information for the police
to use but the information they did have they wasn't used properly, like the descriptions after the
death of Annie Chapman, which was disregarded just because their times didn't correspond with the
time of the coroners time of death. The Ripper could commit his murders in the dead of night
without fear of being seen, as nobody would choose to remain outside in that place at night. Source
E also implies that the police were ignorant towards the public. The identity of the Ripper is
unknown because he was never caught.