King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore

Site information paper

Introduction

Currently, untreated sewage regularly overflows into the River Thames from Londons Victorian sewerage system via combined sewer overflows (CSOs). The proposed Thames Tunnel would intercept these overflows through the use of a new storage and transfer tunnel, which would link west London and Abbey Mills Pumping Station. The sewage flow would then be transferred to Beckton Sewage Treatment Works via the Lee Tunnel. The reduction in untreated sewage entering the River Thames would bring long-term benefits for the environment and users of the River Thames. In order to deliver the project we need a number of sites along the route and this document identifies our current preferred site at King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore.

Key facts
Local authority: CSO name: CSO spill volume in an average year: Site type: Duration of main construction works: Tower Hamlets North East Storm Relief 780,000m (equivalent to approximately 312 Olympic swimming pools) CSO site Approximately three and a half years.

Thames Tunnel
1

King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore

Section 1: Introduction and site information
We are proposing to use the foreshore of the River Thames adjacent to King Edward Memorial Park for this construction work, and to accommodate permanent structures required to operate the main tunnel. The site would be used to connect the existing local CSO, known as the North East Storm Relief CSO, to the main tunnel. An area within King Edward Memorial Park would also be used temporarily for our construction works. The location of the site is shown in Figure 1A. Part of the site would be located within the foreshore of the River Thames, with the remainder of the site located within the multi-purpose sports area and park depot in the south western corner of King Edward Memorial Park. The Thames Path runs along the riverside and is located within the site. To the north of the park is The Highway (A1203). Free Trade Wharf, an apartment block, is located to the east. To the south is Shadwell Basin Outdoor Activity Centre and apartment blocks and to the west is Glamis Road. The site is within the Wapping Wall Conservation Area. This site information paper sets out our proposals at King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore. We have also produced project information papers, which cover overarching topics relating to the project. Where we consider that a project information paper is particularly relevant, we have highlighted this in a related documents box. At the end of this site information paper is a list of other documents, which may be of interest and a glossary of terms.

Related documents: Build

Introduction

Draft limit of land to be acquired or used

treet Cable S
North East Storm Relief CSO

Proposed tunnel route centreline Local authority boundary Existing sewer Existing CSO

y The Highwa

Glamis Road

King Edward Memorial Park

TOWER HAMLETS Free Trade Wharf

Shadwell Basin

SOUTHWARK

N
Figure 1A: King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore location plan

King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore

How we chose this site
What we proposed at phase one consultation
At phase one consultation, which was held between September 2010 and January 2011, we presented King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore as our preferred site to intercept the existing North East Storm Relief CSO. We proposed to directly intercept the existing sewer and connect the CSO to the main tunnel within the foreshore of the River Thames.

What we are proposing at phase two consultation

We have identified two shortlisted sites where we would be able to intercept the CSO and connect to the main tunnel within the site. The sites, as shown on Figure 1B, are: King Edward Memorial Park (site 1) King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore (our preferred site). When comparing, site 1 King Edward Memorial Park with King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore, we concluded that King Edward Memorial Park would be less suitable because using the park would involve the temporary loss of a large area of public open space and would be likely to cause more disruption to users of the park. In addition, we have identified three further shortlisted sites, where the connection to the main tunnel would be made at a separate site in conjunction with intercepting the CSO within part of King Edward Memorial Park. The sites, as shown on Figure 1B, are: Heckford Street (site 2) Shadwell Basin (site 3) Limehouse Basin (site 4). We decided that using Site 3 Shadwell Basin and Site 4 Limehouse Basin would be less suitable than Heckford Street (site 2) because it would be technically challenging to undertake the construction works within water basins, the sites have poor access and they are further away from the CSO. This means a longer connection tunnel would be required from one of these sites to the CSO in King Edward Memorial Park.

Why we have amended our proposals

Since January 2011, we have considered the comments from phase one consultation, feedback from ongoing engagement and new information; and undertaken further technical work. This work led us to review potential sites to intercept the CSO and how to connect it to the main tunnel. Since phase one consultation we have: Looked again at the layout of our phase one consultation foreshore site and access requirements. Re-assessed all potential sites that could be used to intercept the CSO. Investigated options where the CSO could be intercepted within King Edward Memorial Park with a separate site being used to connect the CSO to the main tunnel. As a result of this work, an option could be to use King Edward Memorial Park with a site at Heckford Street to connect the CSO to the main tunnel. In order to seek feedback on this potential preliminary working option, in July 2011 we held drop-in sessions for the local community to understand the options proposed at King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore and Heckford Street. We reviewed all the comments we received and took these into account as part of the site selection process. 4

Introduction

Preferred site King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore Other shortlisted site locations Local authority boundary

Site 4 Site 2

Site 1 Site 3

TOWER HAMLETS

SOUTHWARK

N
Figure 1B: Preferred and shortlisted sites

King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore

The alignment of the main tunnel varies depending upon where the CSO is connected to the main tunnel. Figure 1C shows how the CSO is connected to the main tunnel and the different alignments of the main tunnel for King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore and Heckford Street. When comparing the sites, our conclusion is that, on balance, King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore should remain our preferred site. We propose to reduce the size of the construction site in the foreshore of the River Thames compared with our proposals at phase one consultation, which would reduce the effect on the foreshore and adjacent residential area. Office and welfare buildings would be located in the depot and hardstanding areas in the south western part of the park. Our proposed temporary construction access has moved from the north eastern corner of the park, off The Highway (A1203), to Glamis Road. A significant length of river frontage adjacent to the Rotherhithe Tunnel ventilation shaft will remain accessible throughout the construction period, as will the vast majority of the park. After the construction works are completed, this access would remain and would offer an improved route for the Thames Path to be integrated with the park. On completion of our work, the park would be enlarged due to the extension into foreshore. There would also be opportunities to reinstate recreational facilities and enhance the park facilities. Site 2 Heckford Street is a shortlisted site that would need to be used together with a site in King Edward Memorial Park. This option is considered less suitable than our preferred site because the combination of both sites and the additional tunnelling works would be likely to take longer, cause more disruption to both park users and the local community, and put more traffic on local roads. The site would result in the disruption and potential loss of some businesses in an area where the local authority is seeking to protect employment uses. The use of this site would also result in greater effects on people living and working near this site in comparison to our preferred site as it would not be possible to utilise the River Thames for movement of materials. Furthermore the tunnels would pass below significantly more buildings and the connection tunnel would be at much shallower depth.

Related documents:

Q&A

Consultation Site selection

Introduction

Worksite for shaft construction

Preferred site King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore Site 2 Heckford Street Tunnel centre line (preferred site) Tunnel centre line (site 2) Local authority boundary Existing sewer Existing CSO

Worksite for CSO interception

TOWER HAMLETS Connection tunnel

SOUTHWARK

Controlled (day time) crossing open unless road required by construction activities N
Figure 1C: Connecting North East Storm Relief CSO to the main tunnel

King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore

Section 2: Construction
Construction activities
Construction activities are required to intercept the CSO. We would construct an interception chamber to intercept the CSO. A connection culvert would link the interception chamber to a drop shaft (approximately 60m deep) through which flows would pass into the main tunnel. Figure 2A illustrates the below ground infrastructure proposed. As the construction works would take place within the foreshore of the River Thames, a permanent structure projecting into the foreshore is required. These activities would take place within the area indicated by the red line in Figure 1A, in four main phases, lasting approximately three and a half years in total. The main construction activities associated with these phases are set out in Table 2.1. After completion of the works and site restoration we may need to visit the site for short periods to support finishing works at the bottom of the drop shaft, which will be carried out from within the main tunnel and serviced from the site at Chambers Wharf. For example, we may need to provide ventilation for the workers in the main tunnel and a means of emergency escape.

Related documents: Build Managing construction

Construction

Existing sewer Connection culvert

Construction

Drop shaft

Valve chamber Interception chamber

Existing overflow to River Thames Main tunnel

Figure 2A: Illustration showing typical elements of below ground infrastructure

King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore

Phase 1 Advance works
Table 2.1: Main activities during construction phases

Site setup

Figure reference
Typical working hours Utilities connected Utilities diverted or protected

Varies

Figure 2C
Standard

Main construction activities

Pre-construction landscape works carried out Site cleared Temporary works in River Thames constructed Site facilities and access set up Drop shaft excavated and built Above and below ground structures constructed Mechanical and electrical equipment installed Temporary works in the River Thames removed Site restored and landscaped Temporary site facilities removed

Our typical working hours are expected to be: Standard: 8am-6pm weekdays, 8am-1pm Saturday* Extended standard: 6pm-10pm weekdays, 1pm-5pm Saturdays Continuous: 24 hours a day, seven days a week** Varies: Working hours for advanced works will depend on the nature of the works and will be agreed with the local authority

10

Construction

Phase 2 Drop shaft construction Figure 2D

Standard with occasional extended standard

Phase 3 Construction of other structures Figure 2E

Standard

Phase 4 Completion of works and site restoration

Standard

* Standard working hours would also include, subject to agreement with the local authority: a short period (up to one hour) before works start and after they have finished to allow our workers to prepare for work and check the site. equipment and machinery maintenance could also take place 1pm-5pm Saturday and 10am-4pm Sunday. ** The main activities taking place 24 hours a day are below ground or within an enclosure.

11

King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore

Site layout and construction phases
Figures 2C, 2D and 2E show how the site might be laid out during the construction phases, which are set out in Table 2.1 and Figure 2B. These layouts have been informed by the size of the infrastructure proposed, the construction methods required and the location of neighbouring buildings and structures. They have also been developed to minimise effects on the local community and environment. Particular factors at this site that have influenced the layout are as follows: Since phase one consultation, the temporary office and welfare buildings required to service the construction site have been moved from the foreshore of the River Thames to the multi-purpose sports area and park depot in the south western corner of the park. A smaller area of foreshore is now required for the construction works, thereby reducing potential effects on river ecology, river navigation and river users. Year 1 Advance works Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 The access route to the site has been amended since phase one consultation. The proposed access at phase one consultation was from the north of the site, directly off The Highway (A1203). We are now proposing to access the site from the south west, off Glamis Road. The proposed construction access would reduce the effects of construction traffic on the strategic highway network and provide a safer access to the site via an existing traffic light controlled junction. In addition the new access road avoids a wildlife meadow in the eastern part of the park and is also located further from the Free Trade Wharf residential development and the access to Free Trade Wharf. The proposed access route through the park runs parallel to the river frontage and offers an opportunity to reinstate the Thames Path with improved pedestrian and cycle access on completion of the project. The site layouts are indicative only, and the contractor may arrange the site in a different way, depending on the chosen construction methods, provided that any environmental effects are appropriately managed and that the main construction activities are undertaken within the red line shown in Figure 1A.

P1 P2

P3 P4

Figure 2B: Construction timeline showing approximate duration of works in phases (P)

12

Construction

Diversion only required when internal site road in use

Maximum extent of construction site for phase 1 Site hoarding Cofferdam

Controlled (day time) crossing open unless required by construction activities

Local authority boundary Site support/welfare Internal site road Site access Existing Thames Path Thames Path diversion Jack up barge servicing piling operations Barge TOWER HAMLETS SOUTHWARK

N
Figure 2C: Illustrative phase 1 construction plan

13

King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore

Diversion only required when internal site road in use

Maximum extent of construction site for phase 2 Site hoarding Cofferdam

Controlled (day time) crossing open unless required by construction activities

Piling rig

Local authority boundary Site support/welfare Excavated material storage and processing Maintenance workshop and storage Construction support Internal site road

Crane

Barge

Site access Existing Thames Path Thames Path diversion

Drop shaft

TOWER HAMLETS

SOUTHWARK N

Figure 2D: Illustrative phase 2 construction plan

14

Construction

Diversion only required when internal site road in use

Maximum extent of construction site for phase 3 Site hoarding Cofferdam

Controlled (day time) crossing open unless required by construction activities

Local authority boundary Site support/welfare Excavated material storage and processing Construction support Internal site road Site access

Drop shaft Option for contractor to transport materials using barges

Existing Thames Path Thames Path diversion

Cranes

TOWER HAMLETS

SOUTHWARK N

Figure 2E: Illustrative phase 3 construction plan

15

King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore

Additional works and activities
The main construction activities at this site are set out in Table 2.1. We would also need to undertake additional works and activities, some of which may be located outside of the area indicated by the red line in Figure 1A. The anticipated additional works and activities are set out in Table 2.2.

When

Type of works
Installation of equipment to monitor environmental matters such as noise, vibration and dust. Protection works to third party structures (such as buildings, bridges and tunnels).

What we would do
The locations of monitoring equipment would be agreed with the local authority and relevant landowners. We would undertake studies to identify any effects our construction work may have on third party structures. The studies may recommend particular construction methods or, in very limited instances, protection works. If protection works are required to the existing sewer, we would access the sewer network through existing manholes. If utility diversions are required, we would work with utility providers to undertake the necessary works. We expect to connect to water, sewer and phone supplies in Glamis Road or The Highway (A1203). We may need to connect to a power supply in Welclose Square, running cables long Cable Street and Glamis Road. However, we are still developing a route for electricity supply in discussion with the utility provider.

Required for construction phase

Diversion of utilities.

Temporary connection to utilities (such as water, sewer, phone and electricity).

16

Construction

When

Type of works
Traffic management works.

What we would do
These may need to extend beyond our site and could include relocating kerb lines, repainting road lines and modifying traffic signals. There is a possibility that as the detailed design is developed we may need to undertake dredging to allow barges to get to and from our site. We may need to carry out works to strengthen the river bed to avoid scour.

Dredging. Required for construction phase Protection of river bed.

We would reconfigure and relocate the multi-purpose sports area, childrens playground and memorial benches within the park. The Landscaping works memorial benches would be moved to a new permanent location as completed in advance of the shown in Figure 3D. We would dismantle the bandstand and store it main construction works. so that it can be re-erected at the end of construction works. Paving and landscaping works to the seating area next to the Rotherhithe Tunnel ventilation shaft would also be undertaken. Permanent connection to utilities (such as water, phone and electricity supply) for the operational tunnel. Landscaping works. We expect to connect to utilities in Glamis Road or The Highway (A1203). The multi-purpose sports area would be reinstated in its existing location. We would relocate the childrens playground to a new permanent location within the park, as shown in Figure 3E.

Required for operational phase

Table 2.2: Additional works and activities

17

King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore

Construction transport and access
We propose to use barges to bring in and take away the material used to fill the cofferdam and to take away excavated material from the shaft. It is not generally practical and cost effective to transport all materials to and from the site by barge so we would still need to transport some materials by road. We would however give the contractor the flexibility to determine the most practical and cost-effective means of transporting other materials and equipment. Each barge would remove approximately 55 lorries from the road. Using barges at this site would reduce the number of lorry visits to/ from this site by approximately 55% (saving 12,000 lorry visits over the construction period of approximately three and a half years). Table 2.3 sets out the anticipated average daily number of lorries and barges visiting (ie travelling to and from) the site during the peak months of each phase, based on moving cofferdam fill material by barge. Construction traffic would access the site from The Highway (A1203), travelling south down Glamis Road and turning left into the site from a new entrance on Glamis Road. Traffic would leave the site via the same route. This access route is shown on Figure 2F. Beyond this, construction traffic would use the major road network to get to and from its final destination. We may need to suspend or relocate some coach parking bays on Glamis Road during construction. We may also need to make some modifications to the junction of Glamis Road and The Highway (A1203) to accommodate construction traffic turning into Glamis Road. The Thames Path currently runs through the park. Since the Thames Path would be located within part of our construction site, it would be necessary to temporarily divert the Thames Path around part of our site. In order for the diverted Thames Path to re-join the existing Thames Path, it would need to cross our internal site road. Should construction vehicles be using the road, a gated access would prevent pedestrians and cyclists crossing it. This arrangement would mean that access to the seating area next to the Rotherhithe Tunnel ventilation shaft, which provides views across the River Thames, would be maintained. When the road is in use, pedestrians and cyclists would be directed to a diversion, which runs through the park as shown on Figures 2C, 2D and 2E. Based on our current design we do not anticipate that any other footpath or road diversions or bus stop relocations would be required.

Phase 1 Site setup

Phase 2 Drop shaft construction

19 lorries 1 barge

Phase 3 Construction of other structures

22 lorries none

Phase 4 Completion of works and site restoration

7 lorries 2 barges

Average daily lorry visits Average daily barge visits

13 lorries 2 barges

Table 2.3: Average daily lorry and barge visits during the peak months

18

Construction

Possible junction modifications

The Highway

A1203 A101 Glamis Road

Rotherhithe Tunnel

Suspension of coach parking

TOWER HAMLETS

SOUTHWARK

Left turn in, right turn out

Glamis Road

Figure 2F: Proposed access route to the site from the nearest major road

Draft limit of land to be acquired or used Internal site road Site access

Local authority boundary Transport for London (TfL) road network Proposed lorry access to TfL road network

Related documents: Transport

19

King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore

Management of construction works
Our construction works would be managed in accordance with an agreed Code of construction practice (CoCP). For phase two consultation, we have produced a draft CoCP Part A: General requirements, informed by CoCPs from other major construction projects in London and consultation with the local authorities. Through the environmental impact assessment process, schemewide principles to address potential effects on the local environment have been identified and integrated into the design. The CoCP Part A sets out scheme-wide control measures that would be used to minimise potential effects during the construction process. Table 2.4 sets out what we consider to be the key issues for this site during construction, and how we are currently proposing to address them.

Related documents: Environment

Issue
Permanent relocation of the childrens playground, currently located in the south western corner of the park. Temporary loss of part of the multi-purpose sports area and some tennis courts, located in the south western corner of the park. Potential loss of and damage to trees within the park.

Our response
Prior to the main construction phase, the playground would be relocated within the park. We would work with park users and the London Borough of Tower Hamlets to agree the relocation and design of the playground.

During construction, some of the tennis courts would be used to provide a temporary replacement multi-purpose sports area. The multi-purpose sports area would be reinstated in its existing location and in an improved condition following completion of construction. We have sought to minimise tree loss and damage where possible, and will propose careful root protection, pollarding and trimming methods. Proposals for permanent site landscaping incorporate the planting of more trees than the number expected to be lost during construction. Where possible it is intended that landscaping would be undertaken in advance of the main construction works commencing.

20

Construction

Issue
Temporary diversion of the Thames Path, restricted access to the riverfront and possible loss of river views.

Our response
Access to the Thames Path next to the River Thames beside the Rotherhithe Tunnel ventilation shaft would be maintained throughout construction. Gated access across the internal site road would allow access from the ventilation shaft to the rest of the park when it is not being used by construction vehicles. Views over the River Thames would be temporarily affected during construction. However, access will be maintained to the river front from parts of the park including the new seating area beside the Rotherhithe Tunnel ventilation shaft. Since phase one consultation, site access has been relocated to the south west side of the park, off Glamis Road to reduce the effects of construction traffic on the major road network and provide safer site access. We would manage the effects of road transport through our traffic management plans, which will seek to limit the number of vehicle movements and hours of operation, identify the most suitable site access points and any necessary highway management arrangements. As already set out, we also propose to use barges to bring in and take away the majority of material used to fill the cofferdam, which would significantly reduce the number of lorry movements from this site over the construction period. The extent and duration of the suspension of any coach bays during construction would be minimised as far as possible. We are investigating options for temporary replacement parking provision during construction where necessary. Since phase one consultation, we have reduced the area of temporary cofferdam foreshore extension by relocating those construction activities that do not need to be located immediately adjacent to the main tunnel site to the areas of hardstanding on the western side of the park, near Glamis Road. We have undertaken modelling to test the effect that the structure has on the flow of the river. The modelling has shown the proposed structure to be satisfactory and the Port of London Authority and other key stakeholders are satisfied the permanent works have a minimum effect on river navigation. A full navigational risk assessment will be undertaken for the temporary and permanent works. Existing moorings may have to be temporarily relocated.

Possible effect of construction vehicles on the capacity and operation of the local road network.

Temporary suspension or relocation of some coach parking bays on Glamis Road. Possible effect of foreshore construction activities on river navigation and river users of the River Thames, including the Shadwell Basin Outdoor Activity Centre.

Table 2.4: Key issues relating to construction

21

King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore

Issue
Possible effect of noise and vibration from construction activities on neighbouring areas. Possible effects on local air quality and dust nuisance in neighbouring areas. Possible effects on foreshore habitat and river wildlife within the River Thames.

Our response
Since phase one consultation, we have relocated the construction site access point to Glamis Road on the west of the site, to reduce effects on the nearest residential properties. The contractor would also be required to implement noise and vibration control measures at the worksite, which will be set out in the CoCP. Preliminary findings indicate that while there is the potential for dust nuisance effects, there are unlikely to be any significant local air quality effects at any of the sites. The contractor would put in place air and dust control measures at the worksite, which will be set out in the CoCP. Since phase one consultation, we have reduced the area of temporary cofferdam foreshore extension to reduce potential effects on ecology. Ecological surveys are also being undertaken to identify possible effects arising from construction activities. The contractor would put in place various control measures at the worksite to minimise these effects as far as possible. These will be set out in the CoCP.

Table 2.4: Key issues relating to construction

Related documents: Managing construction Transport

22

Future use

Section 3: Future use

This section describes the site after the completion of the construction work, ie when the main tunnel is in use the operational phase. Our permanent works which are formed within a structure extending into the foreshore of the River Thames need to incorporate functional elements, which are required for the operation of the tunnel. These include: Underground structures with ground level access covers including: a CSO drop shaft with an internal diameter of approximately 20m, connection culverts, interception chamber, valve chamber and a passive filter chamber. Two main ventilation columns up to 5m high. Two small diameter ventilation columns to the interception chamber up to 6m high. Maintenance vehicle access. An electrical and control kiosk. Table 3.1 sets out the site specific issues that have influenced our permanent design proposals and how we have addressed them in our proposed design.

Design
Since phase one consultation we have progressed the design for the permanent use and appearance of the structures at King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore. The design of the permanent proposals follows our schemewide principles and takes into account comments made and ongoing engagement with the London Borough of Tower Hamlets and other technical consultees.

Future use

23

King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore

Issue
Effect on Rotherhithe Tunnel Accommodation of Cole Stairs and Bell Wharf CSOs (two existing local CSOs that do not need to be intercepted as part of the Thames Tunnel project based on the assessment undertaken by the Environment Agency).

Our response
Careful siting of foreshore extension and permanent works to avoid infringing into the protected zone of the Rotherhithe Tunnel.

Careful siting of foreshore extension and permanent works to ensure that the two further CSOs not being intercepted remain operational either side of the new structure. Avoiding interference with these CSOs ensures that they do not need to be incorporated into the works and therefore the size of construction site required is minimised.

Effect on King Edward Memorial Park.

The proposed above ground structures have been reduced in size since phase one consultation, as a result of the modified scheme-wide ventilation strategy. In addition the proposed electrical and control kiosk has been relocated to the eastern perimeter of the park. Removing this structure from the foreshore extension makes it less visible and avoids interrupting views of the River Thames. A number of architectural design developments have taken place to ensure that the architectural design of the above ground structures and the foreshore extension is sympathetic to the park. The new foreshore structure would extend the area of the park as it will be designed to blend with the existing green space.

Effect on the setting of the Grade II listed Rotherhithe Tunnel ventilation shaft and character of the Wapping Wall Conservation Area.

The majority of the proposed permanent works on this site would be below or at ground level to avoid any significant effect on the setting of the listed buildings or character of the Conservation Area. Landscaping for the extended and reinstated areas of the park would be designed in consultation with the relevant stakeholders to ensure that the character of the Conservation Area is preserved and enhanced.

24

Future use

Issue

Our response
We have reduced the size of the foreshore area required for permanent works since phase one consultation by moving the shaft closer to the river wall and re-profiling the foreshore extension to minimise effects on river flows.

Effects on river navigation and hydraulics.

Preliminary modelling has indicated that the proposed design is acceptable in terms of river flow. The proposals have been discussed with the Port of London Authority and other key stakeholders to develop a layout that has a minimal effect on river navigation. Our proposals for the permanent layout and design of the site have sought to reduce the extent of the permanent works within the foreshore to minimise effects on water ecology as far as possible.

Loss of foreshore habitat and effects on ecology within the River Thames.

Ecological surveys of the River Thames and its foreshore are being undertaken to identify possible effects, and design measures will be incorporated where required. Construction of the tunnel would also deliver river wide improvements to local water quality, which would result in positive effects on river ecology, including habitat improvements and reduced fish kills. The permanent arrangement for the access route to our site from Glamis Road would provide an opportunity to use this as an enhanced Thames Path route for pedestrians and cyclists. The current Thames Path off Glamis Road is via a narrow and enclosed footway which could be widened and include potential landscaping improvements. The design of this route would be informed by the assessments of the current use and quality of the park along with ongoing consultation with the key stakeholders including the local authority.

Effect on Thames Path.

Table 3.1: Site specific issues that have influenced our permanent design

25

King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore

Figures 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D and 3E show the current site and provide illustrations of our design proposals. Further information on the development of our design can be found in the Design development report.

Related documents: Design

Figure 3A: Photo of the site before the works

26

Future use

Figure 3B: Artists impression of the site after the works are completed

27

King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore

Relocated multipurpose sports area Memorial Park benches permanently relocated in line with Memorial Thames Path diverted around construction site hoarding

The Highway

Glamis Road

Proposed construction site

Proposed construction site

Controlled (daytime) crossing of construction access route open unless required by construction activities

N Thames Path remains open during construction Minor reconfiguration of tennis courts Relocated childrens play area Paving and landscaping improvements to area around Rotherhithe Tunnel ventilation shaft Advanced tree planting to improve Memorial Avenue

Figure 3C: Layout of the site showing landscape advance works

28

Future use
Memorial Park benches relocated on line with Memorial Electrical and control kiosk against existing brick wall

Football pitch access

Relocated childrens play area

Relocated bandstand

The Highway

Glamis Road

Bowling green Football pitch Tennis courts New North East Storm Relief CSO outlet

Thames Path widened and improved. Provides maintenance access to shaft N Bike stands New gated entrance to park and Thames path Activity/ fitness zone Seating area Ventilation columns Grassed area around relocated bandstand

Figure 3D: Layout of site once construction works complete

29

King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore

Figure 3E: Aerial view of the completed works

30

Future use

Operation and maintenance

Once the tunnel is operational, we would need access to the site occasionally for inspection and maintenance purposes. We expect to visit the site approximately once every three to six months to carry out inspections and maintenance of the ventilation and below ground equipment. This is likely to involve a visit by staff in a small van, and may take several hours. Once every ten years, we expect to carry out a major internal inspection of the tunnel and underground structures. This is likely to involve a small team of inspection staff, a small team of support crew and two mobile cranes to lower the team and inspection vehicle into the shaft. This is likely to take several weeks, and would require temporary fencing around the shaft for safety and security while the inspection takes place. We may also need to make visits to the site for unplanned maintenance or repairs, for example, if there is a blockage, or equipment failure. This may require the use of mobile cranes and vans. Permanent vehicular access would be from Glamis Road.

Management of operational effects

We have undertaken technical work, including stakeholder engagement, to assess and identify the key issues associated with this site once it is operational. Table 3.2 summarises these issues and how we are currently proposing to address them.

Related documents: Odour

Issue

Our response
Odour effects at this site are expected to be negligible because we have developed an Air management plan to minimise possible odour and air quality effects arising from the operation of the tunnel. The technology we are proposing to use at this site includes the use of passive below ground carbon filters that will remove possible odour before air leaves the ventilation equipment. Permanent access would be required for maintenance and servicing purposes to the shaft and ventilation equipment. Any planned maintenance visits would be undertaken during normal working hours and all visits managed to avoid disruption to local residents, businesses and users of affected public areas as far as possible.

Possible odour effects during the operation of the tunnel.

Disturbance from future maintenance access.

Table 3.2: Key issues relating to site operation

31

Further information
This section sets out documents which may be of particular interest. Further information on our proposals can be found on our website (www.thamestunnelconsultation.co.uk) or is available upon request (call our customer centre on 0800 0721 086).

Phase two public consultation material

Project information papers include general information about the Thames Tunnel project. There are 17 project information papers, which cover various aspects of the project. Those project information papers that may be of particular interest are set out below. Icon Title Build Details Provides information on the different types of sites required for the Thames Tunnel project and the typical construction activities that will be undertaken at each site. Sets out the consultation we have undertaken to date on the project, the scope of this phase two consultation and how interested parties can respond to this consultation. Contains the design principles which have influenced the permanent appearance of our sites once construction work is complete. Sets out the process the project is following to assess potential environmental effects of the Thames Tunnel project. Includes information on what measures our contractors will put in place at our sites during construction.

Q&A

Consultation

Design

Environment

Managing construction

Odour

Sets out our Air management plan and how it will work.

Options

Outlines the various ways to deal with sewage overflows.

32

Phase two public consultation material

Icon Title Details Sets out how Londons sewerage system works and why the capital has an overflow problem.

Overflow Route and tunnel alignment Site selection

Sets out the preferred route of the main tunnel and the reasons for our preference.

Sets out the process we followed to find and select our preferred sites. Contains information on the different transport options we have considered for delivering and removing materials from our sites.

Transport

33

Further information
Technical reports
Theme Interim engagement Phase one consultation Icon Title Interim engagement report Report on phase one consultation: summary report Details Provides a summary of the public engagement we have undertaken between phase one and phase two consultations. Provides a summary of the comments made at phase one consultation and our responses.

SUMMARY

Phase two construction information

Code of construction practice Part A: Sets out control measures to be adopted during the project General requirements construction period. (CoCP) Air management plan Outlines the methods which we will use to manage odour from the main tunnel at all our preferred sites. Contains initial assessments on the environmental effects of the Thames Tunnel project based on information collected to date. Please refer to volume 23 of the non-technical summary and volume 23 of the PEIR for more information on this site. Provides a general overview of how the scheme design at each site has evolved to date. Please refer to chapter 20 for more information on this site. Provides an overview of the development of the Thames Tunnel project and how each site was chosen. Please refer to Appendix S for more information on this site.

Phase two environmental information

Preliminary environmental information report (PEIR) Design development report

Phase two scheme development

Phase two scheme development report

34

Site glossary
Term
Carbon filters Cofferdam Combined sewer Combined sewer overflow (CSO) Connection tunnel Conservation area Draft limit of land to be acquired or used Drop shaft Foreshore Interception chamber Main tunnel Operational phase Scour Thames Tunnel project Transport for London Road Network (TLRN)

Definition
Filters that remove odours before the air is released from the tunnel. A wall that is constructed within the river around the outside of the working area and then pumped dry. The inside of the cofferdam can then be filled to create a safe working area. A single sewer system that takes both rainwater and domestic and industrial wastewater. A structure, or series of structures, that allows sewers to overflow into the river when they are full as a result of increased rainfall. Without the overflow, the sewer would back up and cause flooding in streets or houses. A tunnel connecting a drop shaft to the main tunnel. An area designated by the local authority or English Heritage as having special architectural or historical interest. The extent of land that we may need to use or acquire, or over which rights may be needed to carry out works that are essential to the project. A vertical circular concrete structure, used to drop flows from the high level of the CSO to the low level of the main tunnel. It would also be used to provide access to construct the connection tunnels. Ground uncovered by the river when the tide is low. A structure, built on an existing combined sewer, which diverts stormwater overflow into the main tunnel. The tunnel from Acton Storm Tanks to Abbey Mills Pumping Station. After the completion of the construction work when the main tunnel is in use. Movement of the riverbed materials due to the force of the water. The Thames Tunnel project comprises a storage and transfer tunnel, from west London to Beckton Sewage Treatment Works in east London, and the control of 34 CSOs along the Thames Tideway. The network of roads managed by Transport for London. These are the major or strategic roads, which have high capacity.

35

Phase two consultation: King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore Autumn 2011 110-ED-PNC-00000-000086

For further information or to comment on our proposals see our website: www.thamestunnelconsultation.co.uk

It is very important that you understand the information we have provided. If you need further information in another language, braille, large print or audio format please contact us on 0800 0721 086.