Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 Introduction
Solar energy is becoming a valuable renewable energy alternative for the limited
fossil fuel resources. Among the simplest and most direct applications of this
energy is the conversion of solar radiation into heat, which can be applied in drying
process. Hence, the realization of an efficient solar dryer requires a thorough study
of its main element, namely, the solar air heater that generates thermal energy.
Several designs and improved technologies of solar air heaters have been
proposed and discussed in literature. These researches carry out on the type of the
air channel (single, double, or counter-flow channel), the number of glazing, and the
type the absorber (flat, corrugated, or finned). For example, Karim and Hawlader
(2006) showed that the V-corrugated absorber is 10–15% and 5–11% more effec-
tive in single pass and double pass modes, respectively, compared to flat plate
absorbers. Omojaro and Aldabbagh (2010) found that the efficiency of the double
pass collector is greater than the single pass by 7–19.4%. El-Sebaii et al. (2011)
showed that the V-corrugated is greater than the flat plate absorber by 5% in terms
of outlet temperature and by 11–14% in terms of efficiency. At last but not least,
Karim et al. (2014) investigated theoretically and experimentally a counter-flow
V-corrugated solar air heater and found that solar radiation, inlet air temperature,
flow rate and collector’s length have a significant effect on the efficiency of the air
collector.
The aim of the present paper is to develop a dynamic mathematical model which
can be applied to different configurations of solar air heaters, namely, flat plate and
V-corrugated solar air heaters operated in single and counter-flow modes in order to
assist in the interpretation of the phenomena observed in the collectors, predict
trends, and assist in the optimization of suitable devices.
Nomenclature
L Length of the collector (m)
W Width of the collector (m)
Dh Hydraulic diameter (m)
G Solar radiation on titled surface (Wm2)
T Temperatures (K)
V Wind velocity (ms1)
C Specific heat (Jkg1K1)
h Heat transfer coefficient (Wm2K1)
k Thermal conductivity (Wm1K1)
mf Air mass flow rate (kgs1)
Hc Gap between V-corrugated absorber and glass cover (m)
Hg Height of V-corrugated absorber (m)
Ub Bottom heat loss coefficient (Wm2K1)
Re Reynolds number
Pr Prandtl number
Nu Nusselt number
Ra Rayleigh number
x Spatial coordinate (m)
n Number of nodes in flow direction
r Rate of the aperture area
g Gravitational constant (9.81 m2.s1)
Greek letters
δ Thickness (m)
α Absorptivity
ɛ Emissivity
τ Transmissivity
ρ Density (kgm3)
θ Tilt angle of the collector, degrees
η Instantaneous thermal efficiency of the collector (%)
Subscripts
a Ambient
s Sky
w Wind
g Glass cover
ag Air gap between glass cover and absorber
p Absorber
(continued)
Modelling of Flat Plate and V-Corrugated Solar Air Heaters for Single. . . 305
2 Theoretical Analysis
In the present models, the analyzed control volume of the collector is divided into
five parts which are perpendicular to the air flow direction, namely, the glass cover,
the air gap between the cover and the absorber, the absorber, the air working fluid,
and the insulation. The governing equations are derived by applying the general
energy balance for each element of the collector.
dT g
ρg δ g C g ¼ αg G þ hw þ hrgs T a T g
dt
ð1Þ
þ hcgðagÞ T ag T g þ hrgp T p T g
306 H.E. Ferouali et al.
dT ag
ρag T ag δag Cag T ag ¼ hcgðagÞ T g T ag
dt
ð2Þ
þ hcðagÞp T p T ag
dT p
ρp δp Cp ¼ rαp τg G þ hcðagÞp T ag T p
dt
ð3Þ
þ hrgp T g T p þ hcpf T f T p þ hrpb T b T p
where r is the rate of the aperture area of the absorber on which the solar radiation
falls, in this case r ¼ 1.
∂T f mf Cf ðT f Þ ∂T f
ρf ðT f Þδf Cf ðT f Þ ¼ hcpf T p T f þ hcbf ðT b T f Þ ð4Þ
∂t W ∂x
dT b
ρb δ b C b ¼ hrpb T p T b þ hcbf ðT f T b Þ
dt ð5Þ
þ U b ðT a T b Þ
The heat transfer coefficients are calculated using familiar methods and formulas
available in the literature. For example, the convection heat transfer coefficient in
the air gap between the cover and the absorber is calculated according to Hollands
et al. (1976):
Nuag K ag
hcgðagÞ ¼ hcðagÞp ¼ ð6Þ
δag
1
The “þ” symbol in the superscript means that only positive values of the terms in the square
brackets are to be used.
Modelling of Flat Plate and V-Corrugated Solar Air Heaters for Single. . . 307
!
1708 þ ð sin 1:8 θÞ1:6 1708
Nuag ¼ 1 þ 1:44 1 1
Ra cos θ Ra cos θ
" 1 # þ ð7Þ
Ra cos θ 3
þ 1
5830
The convection heat transfer coefficient between the absorber and the air flow is
expressed as follows:
Nuf K f
hcpf ¼ hcbf ¼ ð8Þ
Dh
• For laminar air flow Ref < 2100, the Nusselt number may be calculated from the
equation proposed by Mercer et al. (1967):
0:0606ðRef Pr f Dh =LÞ1:2
Nuf ¼ 4:9 þ ð9Þ
1 þ 0:0909ðRef Pr f Dh =LÞ0:7 Pr 0:17
f
• For turbulent air flow, Ref 2100, the Nusselt number may be calculated from
the equation below proposed by Kays and Crawford (1980):
Nuf ¼ 0:0158Re0:8
f ð10Þ
Fig. 2 Single-flow
V-corrugated solar air
heater
308 H.E. Ferouali et al.
For the absorber, the energy balance is given by (3) but in this case r ¼ 2/3.
For the working fluid:
Hg ∂T f
ρf ðT f Þ Cf ðT f Þ ¼ 2hcpf T p T f þ hcbf ðT b T f Þ
2 ∂t
ð12Þ
mf Cf ðT f Þ ∂T f
W ∂x
The convection heat transfer coefficient in the air gap between the cover and the
absorber is calculated as follows:
Nuag K ag
hcgðagÞ ¼ hcðagÞp ¼ ð13Þ
H
Hc þ 2g
Hg
Nuf ¼ 2:821 þ 0:126Ref ð14Þ
L
Hg
Nuf ¼ 1:9 106 Re1:79
f þ 225 ð15Þ
L
Hg
Nuf ¼ 0:0302Re0:74
f þ 0:242Re0:74
f ð16Þ
L
In these models, the analyzed control volume of the collector is divided into five
parts, which are the glass cover, the working fluid’s first pass, the absorber, the
working fluid’s second pass, and the insulation.
Modelling of Flat Plate and V-Corrugated Solar Air Heaters for Single. . . 309
∂T f1
ρf1 ðT f1 Þδf1 Cf1 ðT f1 Þ ¼ hcpf1 T p T f1 þ hcgf1 T g T f1
∂t
ð17Þ
mf1 Cf1 ðT f1 Þ ∂T f1
W ∂x
dT p
ρp δp Cp ¼ rαp τg G þ hcpf1 T f1 T p þ hrgp T g T p þ hcpf2 T f2 T p
dt
þ hrpb T b T p
ð18Þ
where r ¼ 1.
∂T f2
ρf2 ðT f2 Þδf2 Cf2 ðT f2 Þ ¼ hcpf2 T p T f2 þ hcbf2 ðT b T f2 Þ
∂t
ð19Þ
mf2 Cf2 ðT f2 Þ ∂T f2
þ
W ∂x
The convection heat transfer coefficients between the absorber and the air flow
in the first and second passes are expressed by the same formulas utilized in single-
flow mode (8), (9) and (10).
310 H.E. Ferouali et al.
Fig. 4 Counter-flow
V-corrugated solar air
heater
Hg ∂T f2
ρf2 ðT f2 Þ Cf2 ðT f2 Þ ¼ 2hcpf2 T p T f2
2 ∂t
ð21Þ
mf2 Cf2 ðT f2 Þ ∂T f2
þhcbf2 ðT b T f2 Þ þ
W ∂x
The convection heat transfer coefficients between the absorber and the air flow
in the first and second passes are expressed by the same formulas utilized in single-
flow mode (8), (14), (15) and (16).
mf Cf ðT out T in Þ
η¼ ð22Þ
LWG
Modelling of Flat Plate and V-Corrugated Solar Air Heaters for Single. . . 311
The specifications of the elements that constitute the solar air heaters simulated in
MATLAB code are the following: The glass cover is a low-iron glass that has high
transmissivity with small absorption coefficient. The absorber material is copper
with black nickel selective coating. And the chosen material for the insulation is
polyurethane foam that has low conductivity which is required to reduce the heat
losses from the collector.
The input of the program includes design and operational parameters. Tables 1
and 2 present, respectively, the various design and operational relevant parameters
used for numerical calculations.
In the proposed numerical method, the thermophysical properties of the air are
temperature-dependent. Based on their values at some temperatures, the cubic
spline interpolation is used to determine them at every temperature.
Table 3 Range of error and running time for each number of nodes
Number of nodes n 4 6 14 22 38 80
Mean error (%) 2.20 1.48 0.52 0.28 0.12 0
Running time (min) 2.98 3.54 8.2 12.76 26.25 74.20
The theoretical outlet temperature of the solar air heater was evaluated for different
numbers of nodes (n ¼ 4, 6, 14, 22, 38 and 80) along the flow direction. The interval
of each simulation is 60 min.
Table 3 presents the running time and the mean error of the obtained tempera-
tures compared to the 80 nodes model. Consequently, the results suggest limiting
the number of nodes to 22 in order to reduce the running time with acceptable errors
from the optimum case of 80 nodes. And so, all simulations in the present paper are
made for n ¼ 22.
Temperature (°C)
Tb
90
80 Tag
70 Tp
60
50
40
30
20
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Time (min)
Fig. 6 Instantaneous 90
Instantaneous Thermal Efficiency (%)
The results under identical operating conditions are shown in Figs. 6 and 7. It is
found that the V-corrugated collector is considerably superior to the flat plate
collector by about 21.64% higher efficiency for single-flow mode and about
17.16% higher efficiency for counter-flow operating mode, indicating that the use
of the V-corrugated absorber improves significantly the thermal performance of a
solar air heater, which is in line with the results of Karim and Hawlader (2006), and
El-Sebaii et al. (2011).
314 H.E. Ferouali et al.
Fig. 8 Instantaneous
80
thermal efficiency of flat
plate solar air heater for 70
single and counter-flow
operating modes 60
50
40
30 Single-flow flat plate collector
Counter-flow flat plate collector
20
10
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Time (min)
According to Figs. 8 and 9, the counter-flow collectors are more efficient than
single-flow ones by about 17.01% and 12.53%, respectively, for the flat plate and
the V-corrugated solar air heaters. Hence, solar collectors with double air passage
as also reported by Omojaro and Aldabbagh (2010) increase the thermal efficiency.
However, their application in natural flow convection is limited because the air
must be forced through the two flow channels for optimal use of the system.
Modelling of Flat Plate and V-Corrugated Solar Air Heaters for Single. . . 315
40
Single-flow V-corrugated collector
Counter-flow V-corrugated collector
20
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Time (min)
4 Experimental Verification
All the experiments that were done to verify the code took place in Marrakech
(Morocco), using an existing flat plate solar collector (see Fig. 10). They were
conducted for 2 days of December 2014 with clear sky condition. The ambient
316 H.E. Ferouali et al.
temperature, collector’s outlet temperature, and the solar radiation were measured
and recorded every 30 min from 9 to 17 h. The average wind velocity was 9 kmh1
and the average humidity was 65%.
The experimental apparatus used for this experimental study are:
• Single glazed flat plate collector of 2.5 m2 area (2.5 m x 1 m) orientated
southward under the angle of 30 versus the horizontal. The top cover is an
ordinary glass of 3 mm (τ g ¼ 0.9, ɛ g ¼ 0.85). The absorber is a 0.5 mm
galvanized iron painted in black (αp ¼ 0.7, ɛp ¼ 0.23, Cp ¼ 444 Jkg1K1,
ρp ¼ 7860 kgm3). The insulation in the bottom and the edges of the collector is
a 5 mm polyurethane foam (kb ¼ 0.025 Wm1K1, ɛ b ¼ 0.6). The thickness of
the air gap between the top glass cover and the absorber is 5 cm and the thickness
of the air channel between the absorber and the insulation is 2.5 cm.
• A centrifugal fan (300 m3h1, 80 mm CE, 220 V), with an upstream restrictor
which allows to vary the air flow rate from 50 to 300 m3h1.
• PT 100 platinum thermocouples.
• A pyranometer Kipp & Zonen CM11 for measuring the solar radiation on 30
inclined surface.
The solar air heater was operated at a flow rate of 300 m3h1(0.0939 kgs1)
during the first day of experience and a flow of 150 m3h1 (0.0469 kgs1) during
the second day of experience.
Figure 11 compares the theoretical and experimental outlet temperatures of the
air working fluid for a flow rate of 300 and 150 m3h1. The comparison shows good
agreement between measured and predicted results.
30
25
Theoretical result (300 m3/h)
20
Experimental result (300 m3/h)
Theoretical result (150 m3/h)
15
Experimental result (150 m3/h)
10
9h 10h 11h 12h 13h 14h 15h 16h 17h
Time (hour)
Modelling of Flat Plate and V-Corrugated Solar Air Heaters for Single. . . 317
5 Conclusion
The mathematical models developed for the flat plate and V-corrugated solar air
heaters and the simulation codes created in MATLAB are able to correctly predict
the instantaneous temperatures of any component at any section of the air collector,
the outlet air temperature, and the instantaneous thermal efficiency.
The simulation results are verified by experimental and theoretical results found
in the literature. Also, an experimental study at an existing flat plate collector was
made in order to verify the proposed model; the analysis shows very good agree-
ment between the measured and the numerically predicted values for different
running conditions and flow rates. And it was found that the proposed model has
the ability to predict the performance of the collector’s different configurations.
References
Duffie, J.A., Beckman, W.A.: Solar Thermal Engineering. Wiley Interscience, New York (1991)
El-Sebaii, A.A., Aboul-Enein, S., Ramadan, M.R.I., Shalaby, S.M., Moharram, B.M.: Investiga-
tion of thermal performance of-double pass-flat and v-corrugated plate solar air heaters.
Energy. 36, 1076–1086 (2011)
Hollands, K.G.T., Unny, T.E., Raithby, G.D., Konicek, L.J.: Free convection heat transfer across
inclined air layers. ASME J. Heat Transfer. 98, 189–193 (1976)
Karim, M.A., Hawlader, M.N.A.: Performance investigation of flat plate, v-corrugated and finned
air collectors. Energy. 31, 452–470 (2006)
Karim, M.A., Perez, E., Amin, Z.M.: Mathematical modelling of counter flow v-grove solar air
collector. Renew. Energy. 67, 192–201 (2014)
Kays, W.M., Crawford, M.E.: Convective Heat and Mass Transfer, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill,
New York (1980)
Mercer, W.E., Pearce, W.M., Hitchcock, J.E.: Laminar forced convection in the entrance region
between parallel flat plates. J Heat Transf Trans ASME. 89, 251–257 (1967)
Omojaro, A.P., Aldabbagh, L.B.Y.: Experimental performance of single and double pass solar air
heater with fins and steel wire mesh as absorber. Appl. Energy. 87, 3759–3765 (2010)