© STA 1Go1e Hypothesis “Testing memes ‘ Beal Hypotnesic °- Th isa stelemet of atsertion abowk +e Heel obishibubion or Unknewn parameten oF a stabs e shdement abort He probability clistrbution jdselF. Noleben + He eg. viet xnPer , uthere Fae 5 1, Cex oO 1 oe 2 Let © dencte 42 averege Sitehime oF @ ones lek Be One et os Ht OSU Ws or Hs gee Os lod ete. both AS A unknowm 2, ae Ae (ened , 48 Sr ase kn sone NGL, 8D > yb KANO i) 5 Verio, ot ee nv Go ae, Hw Simple hypothesis PA stedbishicad Wy potnorls “ha Bia spied rypeteee* UP Mae is fave complebely Ys comply the Compo sit® Hypothrenis A ngpotinerit ate =f aw Seen 1S Known 99 2. composite bapenest ee t acay, 30 ete e 62), . ee hy pothenis jp be teoted Nall hypotaenis ™ aE fomoan ao ee nypethenis Hotedion: Ho sHneris wry be simple of ny be Remark nat WYP? yee > com a@, Vernatve hypottresis The Cemplimendeny of Hat He null hypotreris is Know a Ru altesnabine hy pothesis. Notedion - H,, Rew —— as oe B@ Nut Latternahve hypelteris DN chaw ge Fam priblers +9 prblen. The rubl hypothesis may be simple or lomporiles aloo qua allemakue WYypotnes wey Le simple or composites The poten of -featiug of hypothoris may be disewived a9 fells Given tat Sample pote 2= Ons: rm) Find decision qule CRinchon J juak ail lead to & decision +e veject or fail +o -weject tue math lypothesis: Tn other usetie, porter toe Sample space. inte he disiois gale G and s~ such ak (h 2es & \Ewes, we fal to syeer Ho [fail +o Beeck Ho £ of the time sefewed accept Hol Sede ic ynos [Note + Fail te sseject Ho He ig univenally hue 1 simply eave iat. hye sample. oees not have enowgn evidence. agonal » He “J Choice of Null tip Fishers apprracls a> Meywaam: Pearsens apparently doer mot mean tal gpottenis — Fishers appreack a> thot Wypothesi¢ should be tnken % smalh hypothesis which Hu inveahopter Peds 2 want 4p Aispreve- hence.3) SF wiy Newnan Peareson Oppoack: “ry hat hypotherts js comidered ao valt Ww pothesis , hese wrong tt ssejechion is wore Serigwo + C wrngpd sejecton meawa Hig REISSOrb EN iy tre hypotheris is correct: bd yew bl eject it) —— Thus in ten process of hypothesis senting | Wwe Come acew cwss Fotewing Sthiok on Tre stote eci Hy chsh is. thes His Ame | reyee ito “hee = tee. (| iow decision | 2 = 0 ees aa | Caccept He) | decision | fy Megaman Feaeen ae 5 Type 3 errr is more sens: je to have a decision le so ee we eke comer decision os hy + But note Hot eer 1s 3 ows 2m ene me fe errs: WF bee a dey to yayniynise Mat COMED raha adlity ynalivg, oY land of Cores. we wank te minimise proto: oF tos types oF oes eimusienioy- Mile have or teody seen tuok , WY taking deqgice t. apo “reject , We wer, porstieming, ae samp space \into tue disidnte oh Ss and s* gh W RES we Beek Mozas Type Z emmys LReject Ho] He is hme] S hence pType E ems] = pf seject to / He isbea| a =p | xes/te ishue] es Type exe = [accept Ho] #, is bud) 1 P [Type W emme}=PLacept Ho] ms is bo] =e xes Jim, is boa) whites we dy ct minimise P [Type Z exes] yt mMeaw Hee selon S showid +o be a0 sma a possible SF wall ve lasge- > PLType FT een] will be lasge & nice Vere + This vneany Haak Het probabilities of he types of ems cammet be minimised Simulbeniouly. Tr gon fy to minimise orny one the oer wi) Meseao@e “Xn poeachee, We Folvew tee Folia, precede, z emr js Comidered te be amy Wypotresis estas os Mit Jue welue of ab seme lew value Since Type (mere seriows, Fue ooblem , we Rx boob: of type Ferrer ovol or os) & by to Hed 4 frrvceduve fus whch P Ctype Bend] Ceomanenly deciston 1S wivinem:Test of stechsh'cat Hypothesis: Test Rimchion: A fmehon ¥ 36> bo 1] is Know ao a dak junchon, [IE Is generally R"] . CS armpit Spaced Y Ytaso Veep” 7 Yess 4 YRER” or Vlas Now ) Of KE] Ve ce ete + lek ws relate Huis te feobuy oF hypetheris borbler » We know Haat Ha Sample space % fs Aivided wo tye im overiabing regions Sands fs: aejechon region € Ss accephwe, weaien} ‘ Now we define a duvchen Gi (%> a0 ydiare SV iy xes Qi azeg OS te pBtara 5) vkwvejert Ho © hts do wet veferk ho Le ¢ Hwr= reject Ho \F nes dewstvejeck Wo [Fe € S Caccept He) @ js Known a a deat of Stadishreal Wy pothenis -CG) Naw we will by to wate PLType Lewd + PLType Terms) be wing (xd. N oO Pp [Type E ered] = PU eject to) Ho ts hue] Cowider =P CL RES/ Hy is tmed tx) <= om = 4 Plpes/ngto- plecs ly = pLxes /ng] Thus = P[ Type Lemme] / © [Type pu ens & 60 Firetine, a ol Type TL exmed] =p ]do net wut ie] 4 isbn =P Laccopt Wo] '41 ishmd] Here jwe snow Wihrrduce Ht concept of Pewerr oF He tect Power = ? Lveject Hol Hi ise) =P Ceorrect decisiew] Neirally we prafir a poreedine for bathe Huis pleadility ig a8 ge possible ive Powers shawls be a2 Wig fossible- Noteben, PL Type “L omrmy= f Power = New ay = powers pL Fagect Holt is bad c =PlRes| mise] ornider Ce) = 4. PLecsinqeo eleesly] = ple esn] = PowerWe Tminduce ene mere concept: Sine of ate: “TE the waht hypothenis js Simple wen Size of Atet= PL Wpe Tem): SA Hua null hypothesis is composite, Size of ue test = Max PLtype TK exm) OER Chere @, le Hla sek ob porandten voles under wll hypothesis. Lewet_ ob significance: T+ is an upper loownd fer size of a +eb- \wle say tuat a tok is of leet « ,F We She cles uct exceed + Tw Size < QReved. Remar» “5 fae a teak frotedune if Size <0 07 We Say fae Hob is ok level 0 oF» ENF sre coor, we Sey tun Hest: Way Size O-0}- ees Conclurten , Lunter Sivnple nulh hy prtbenis'| Sike = PL Type L eon] = Pvyeck No] Wo is ae} = bro Power =P (seyece Hof ity is bes EyO9 =; Sire = level. P= PC ype D esa = P Laccept Wo) My ic hue] £1.