Professional Documents
Culture Documents
16
DWDM TOPOLOGIES
16.1 INTRODUCTION
Dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) networks are classified into four
major topological configurations: DWDM point-to-point with or without add-drop
multiplexing network, fully connected mesh network, star network, and DWDM ring
network with OADM nodes and a hub. Each topology has its own requirements and,
based on the application, different optical components may be involved in the re-
spective designs.
In addition, there are hybrid network topologies that may consist of stars and/or
rings that are interconnected with point-to-point links. For example, the Metropolitan
Optical Network project (MONET) is a WDM network developed for and funded by a
number of private companies and by U.S. government agencies. It consists of two sub-
networks, one located in New Jersey and one in the Washington, D.C./Maryland area;
the two are interconnected with a long-distance point-to-point optical link.
197
198 Part IV Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing
Figure 16.1 A DWDM point-to-point with add-drop multiplexing enables the system to drop and add
channels along its path.
In DWDM, each channel is carried over a specified wavelength (hi) also known
as "optical channel." Different channels may carry different data (e.g., voice, data,
video, data packets) at different bit rates. The transmitter-receiver optical link has
several optical components: fiber(s), optical amplifiers, OADM, optical filters, cou-
plers, laser sources, and modulators and receivers. Each has its own signal-affecting
characteristic, as described in Part II. An end-to-end simplistic view of a DWDM
point-to-point system that includes lasers, an optical multiplexer and demultiplexer,
fibers, optical amplifiers (OA), and an optical add-drop multiplexer is shown in
Figure 16.1.
IP _~~,,~~ lJ~
STM - - ...;
Figure 16.2 A DWDM ring network ; the hub station sources and terminates payloads of several
types.
plification (not shown) may be required. The number of nodes is typically less
than the number of wavelengths in the fiber. Figure 16.2 depicts a basic configu-
ration but does not address network survivability or ring fault avoidance.
In the ring topology, the hub station manages channel (wavelength) assign-
ment so that a fully connected network of nodes with OADM is accomplished. The
hub may also provide connectivity with other networks . In addition, an OADM
node may be connected with a multiplexer/demultiplexer where several data
sources are multiplexed. A simple ring topology with a hub and two nodes, A and
B, linked via wavelength Ak is shown in Figure 16.3, where node A also multi-
plexes several data sources. All data sources are terminated by the corresponding
OADM node (node B), however, since they are on the same channel (and the same
wavelength).
Figure 16.3 In a DWDM ring topology, channel (wavelength) assignment may be managed by the hub
station .
200 Part IV Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing
Downstream
Figure 16.4 View of LUCENT Technologies' project FiberVi sta is illustrative of a DWDM and
CWDM system that delivers all service types to the home. (From LUCENT Technologies,
Bell Labs Technology, vol. 2, no. 2, 1998, p. 13. Reprinted with permission.)
The area of DWDM node and DWDM hub is currently evolving. Thus in this sec-
tion we attempt to provide stimulating discussion without any effort to provide sys-
tem solutions.
Wavelength
r
manager Modulators and
r·······························..·······..··..··• ·········..···..·.. ~pi·i·~~·I·t;~nsmitters
i
r
TCP/IP TCP /IP
ATM ATM
Single-mode fiber
STM STM
i Transmit direction
.lI PHY
ljii s
_ . ............... ..................
Detedtors
ATM
STM
1~====~ 1+- -
Single-mode fiber
.lI!
Receive direction
PHY
iii ·..
Electronic regime Photonic regime
Figure 16.6 The hub (in the receive direction) demultiplexes the optical signal to its component ,
wavelength channels, and it converts each channel to a traffic type, TCP/lP, ATM, STM,
etc.
channel requires its own clock recovery circuitry (only one is shown) because all
channels may be at different bit rates.
16.5 FAULTS
DWDM networks must be able to detect faults on the link or on the ring (broken
fiber, faulty port unit, inoperable node) and to isolate a fault. The objective is to of-
fer continuous transmission (service) or service with the minimum disruption possi-
ble, as recommended in the standards. Depending on network topology and archi-
tecture, fault avoidance may be accomplished with dual counterrotating rings (in
ring networks), similar to the fiber-distributed data interface (FOOl). When a fault is
detected in a counterrotating ring architecture, the neighboring OADMs avoid the
fault by rerouting traffic via a Ll-turn optical cross-connect (Figure 16.7). When the
system recovers from the fault or the fault is fixed, the ring network returns to its nor-
mal (prior to the fault occurrence) state.
Similarly, in point-to-point topology, detected faults will trigger a procedure
that either finds an alternative path or causes alarms . In mesh architecture, faults will
trigger a different path selection procedure that bypasses the fault. One of the out-
standing issues for network architects to answer is: When the fault recovers or is
fixed, does the network return to the previous state or does it continue until another
fault is encountered?
Chapter 16 DWDM Topologies 203
.'
..' .' Primary ring
~.,
....••, Secondary ring
OADM
1\2 1\2
Figure 16.7 DWDM ring networks are capable to detect faults and U-turn traffic via an optical
cross-connect .
It should be pointed out that fault avoidance requires complex optical cross-
connect devices that put an additional burden on the power and cost budget of the
ring network. Thus, the burden of the protecting ring should be carefully assessed in
the light of the particular application.
REFERENCES
[1] S.V. Kartalopoulos, Understanding SONETISDH and ATM: Communications Networks
for the Next Millennium, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, 1999.
[2] B. Furht, Handbook of Internet and Multimedia : Systems and Applications, IEEE Press,
Piscataway, NJ, 1999 .
[3] L.G . Raman, Fundamentals of Telecommunications Network Management, IEEE Press,
Piscataway, NJ, 1999.
[4] J.e. Palais, Fiber Optic Communications, 3rd ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ,
1992.
204 Part IV Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing
[23] P. Gambini et al., "Transparent Optical Packet Switching: Network Architecture and
Demonstrators in the KEOPS Project," IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in
Communications, vol. 16, no. 7, September 1998, pp. 1245-1259.
[24] R. Gaudino et al., "MOSAIC: A Multiwavelength Optical Subcarrier Multiplexed
Controlled Network," IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 16, no.
7, September 1998, pp. 1270-1285.
[25] D. Cotter, J.K. Leek, and D.D. Marcenac, "Ultra-High-Bit-Rate Networking: From the
Transcontinental Backbone to the Desktop," IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 35,
no. 4, 1997,pp.90-96.
[26] S.F. Midkiff, "Fiber Optic Backbone Boosts Local-Area Networks," IEEE Circuits and
Devices Magazine, vol. 8, no. 1, January 1992, pp. 17-21.
[27] E. Traupman, P. O'Connell, G. Minnis, M. Jadoul, and H. Mario, "The Evolution of
the Existing Infrastructure," IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 37, no. 6, 1999, pp.
134-139.
[28] A.G. Malis, "Reconstructing Transmission Networks Using ATM and DWDM," IEEE
Communications Magazine, vol. 37, no. 6, 1999, pp. 140-145.
[29] R.K. Snelling, "Bringing Fiber to the Home," IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine, vol.
7, no. 1, January 1991, pp. 23-25.
[30] H. Toba and K. Nosu, "Optical Frequency Division Multiplexing Systems: Review of
Key Technologies and Applications," IEICE Transactions on Communications, vol. E75,
no.4,April1992,pp.243-255.
[31] O.E. DeLange, "Wide-Band Optical Communication Systems. Part II. Frequency-
Division-Multiplexing," Proceedings of IEEE, vol. 58, no. 10, 1970, pp. 1683-1690.
[32] D.K. Hunter et al., "WASPNET: A Wavelength Switched Packet Network," IEEE
Communications Magazine, vol. 37, no. 3, March 1999, pp. 120-129.
[33] E. Modiano, "WDM-Based Packet Network," IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 37,
no. 3, March 1999, pp. 130-135.
[34] H. Kobrinski, R.M. Bulley, M.S. Goodman, M.P. Vecchi, and C.A. Bracket,
"Demonstration of High Capacity in the LAMBDANET Architecture: A Multi-
Wavelength Optical Network," Electronics Letters, vol. 23, 1987, pp. 303-306.
[35] R. Glance, K. Pollock, C.A. Burrus, B.L. Kasper, G. Eisenstein, and L.W. Stulz,
"Densely Spaced WDM Coherent Optical Star Network," Electronics Letters, vol. 23,
no. 17, 1987,pp. 875-876.
[36] N. Takato et al., "128-Channel Polarization-Insensitive Frequency-Selection-Switch
Using High-Silica Waveguides on Si," IEEE Photon Technology Letters, vol. 2, no. 6,
1990, pp. 441-443.
[37] Y.-K. M. Lin, D. Spears, and M. Yin, "Fiber-Based Local Access Network
Architectures," IEEE Communications Magazine, Oct. 1989, pp. 64-73.
[38] R.A. Linke, "Optical Heterodyne Communications Systems," IEEE Communications
Magazine, October 1989, pp. 36-41.
[39] B. Ramamurthy and B. Mukerjee, "Wavelength Conversion in WDM Networking,"
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 16, no. 7, September 1998, pp.
1061-1073.
206 Part IV Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing
STANDARDS
[23] ITU-T Draft Rec. G.691, "Optical Interfaces for Single Channel SDH Systems with
Optical Amplifiers, and STM-64 Systems," October 1998.
[24] ITU-T Draft Rec. G.692, "Optical Interfaces for Multi-channel Systems with Optical
Amplifiers," October 1998.
[25] ITU-T Recommendation G.707, "Network Node Interface for the Synchronous Digital
Hierarchy," 1996.
[26] ITU-T Draft Recommendation G.709, "Network Node Interface for the Optical
Transport Network (OTN)," October 1998.
[27] ITU-T Draft Recommendation G.795, "Forward Error Correction for Submarine
Applications," 1996.
[28] ITU-T Draft Recommendation G.798, "Characteristics of Optical Transport Networks
(OTN) Equipment Functional Blocks," October 1998.
[29] ITU-T Recommendation G.805, "Generic Functional Architecture of Transport
Networks," October 1998.
[30] ITU-T Draft Recommendation G.871, Framework for Optical Networking
Recommendations," October 1998.
[31] ITU-T Draft Recommendation G.872, "Architecture of Optical Transport Networks,"
October 1998.
[32] ITU-T Draft Recommendation G.873, "Optical Transport Network Requirements,"
October 1998.
[33] ITU-T Draft Recommendation G.874, "Management Aspects of the Optical Transport
Network Element," October 1998.
[34] ITU-T Draft Recommendation G.875, "Optical Transport Network Management
Information Model for the Network Element View," October 1998.
[35] ITU-T Recommendation G.911, "Parameters and Calculation Methodologies for
Reliability and Availability of Fibre Optic Systems," 1993.
[36] ITU-T Recommendation G.955, "Digital Line Systems Based on the 1544 kbitls and the
2048 kbitls Hierarchy on Optical Fibre Cables," 1993.
[37] ITU-T Recommendation G.957, "Optical Interfaces for Equipments and Systems
Relating to the Synchronous Digital Hierarchy," 1995.
[38] ITU-T Recommendation G.958, "Digital Line Systems Based on the Synchronous
Digital Hierarchy for Use on Optical Fibre Cables," 1994.
[39] ITU-T Draft Recommendation G.959, "Optical Networking Physical Layer Interfaces,"
February 1999.
[40] Bellcore GR-253, "Synchronous Optical Network [SONET) Transport Systems:
Common Generic Criteria," issue 2, December 1995.