Title: The Challenge of Crafting a Psychology Coursework on the Matching Hypothesis

Crafting a thesis on the intricate subject of the Matching Hypothesis in psychology is no small feat.
As students delve into this complex topic, they encounter a myriad of challenges that can make the
process seem overwhelming. From extensive research requirements to the need for a nuanced
understanding of psychological theories, the task demands a high level of expertise and dedication.

The Matching Hypothesis posits that individuals are more likely to form successful and lasting
romantic relationships with those who are equally socially desirable. This theory, grounded in
psychology, requires a thorough exploration of empirical studies, statistical analyses, and critical
evaluation of existing research. The task involves navigating through a vast body of literature to
build a comprehensive foundation that supports the thesis.

Additionally, the Matching Hypothesis often requires a keen understanding of statistical methods
and research methodologies. Students must not only interpret complex data but also apply these
findings to support or refute the hypothesis. The synthesis of theoretical knowledge and practical
application can be a daunting task for those who are not well-versed in the intricacies of
psychological research.

Time management is another significant hurdle faced by students undertaking a thesis on the
Matching Hypothesis. The process involves extensive literature review, data collection, analysis, and
the actual writing, all of which require meticulous planning and organization. Balancing these tasks
alongside other academic and personal commitments can contribute to stress and anxiety.

Recognizing the formidable nature of this undertaking, we recommend seeking assistance from
professional writing services. Helpwriting.net is a reliable platform that specializes in providing
expert guidance and support for psychology coursework, including the Matching Hypothesis. Their
team of experienced writers possesses the necessary expertise to navigate the complexities of this
topic, ensuring the delivery of high-quality, well-researched theses.

By entrusting your thesis to ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔, you can alleviate the challenges associated with
the Matching Hypothesis. Their commitment to excellence and attention to detail will empower you
to submit a compelling and thoroughly researched thesis that meets the rigorous standards of
academic evaluation. Save yourself the stress and uncertainty – choose ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ for a
seamless and successful thesis writing experience.
Students were asked how much they liked their date and if they wanted to see them again. After the
photos are obtained, record sheets will be produced on which the participants will rate the couples.
Ten heterosexual long term couples aged 18-24 were photographed individually. To overcome this
problem a closed questionnaire will be given to the participants which will be filled out in privacy.
The questionnaires comprised of males and females (from a real relationship) and also males and
females that were randomly selected (fake couples - control group). Efficient market hypothesis
(EMH), first promulgated by Eugene F. I circled them as they lie quite far from the trend line and
also because when looking at the scores there is a considerable difference between them. There will
be a set of instructions to go with the briefing stage. With the results collected we were able to carry
out a correlational analysis. We done this until all the pictures were finished and were left with 10
randomly created couples from the 20 single males and females. This includes factors such as
proximity, body language, facial features, humour etc would be the factors to observe. Walster et al.
(1966) set out to test the Matching hypothesis proposed by Goffman and to see whether people are
attracted to others who are of a similar physical attractiveness. For female participants the opposite is
true with a couple of anomalies. When carrying out the study we will be making sure the risk of harm
is no greater than the day to day risk. I would use approximately 10 photos, as it would give an easy
average to work with. We will ensure that they cannot feel as if they are being judged on the ratings
they give by giving them privacy and also asking them not to place their names on the questionnaire
so that everything remains anonymous. These findings show evident support for the matching
hypothesis. The reasons why this is the case could be that, as human instinct is to reproduce,
evolution will have conditioned one to form a relationship with an individual who is most likely to
reproduce with them and, generally, this would be an individual of the same physical attractiveness.
After the photos are obtained, record sheets will be produced on which the participants will. These
findings did not support the Matching hypothesis. There will be a set of instructions to go with the
briefing stage. As the images were downloaded from a public domain (internet) meaning that when
uploaded by the individual they knew that they would be open for anybody to look at and make
their own judgements. As the observed value is higher than the critical value, the alternative
hypothesis is accepted, and the null hypothesis is rejected. A type two error is when a null hypothesis
is reserved when it is actually wrong. In the case of both male and female passing on their genes
successfully is the main priority. The participants are all from Newcastle upon Tyne, they were
chosen as they were using the school library at the time of the investigation been carried out. If you
do choose to withdraw, all evidence of your participation in this experiment will be destroyed. When
asked if they liked their partner and whether they would re-date them, the key determinate of each
person's desirability was the level of physical attractiveness (Walster et al 1966.) While beauty is a
desirable quality in a partner, if all of us sought the most attractive companion, we would be
repeatedly rejected and very few relationships would actually form. For the questionnaire we wanted
to create we needed a total of 20 females (10 single females and 10 from the real couples) and also
20 males (10 single males and 10 from the real couples that the 10 females came from). It can be
concluded that any differences in results are not due to chance alone.
There will be 10 male participants and 10 female participants to eliminate gender bias and also to
explore gender differences in attractiveness rating. The participants were then debriefed and told
about the experiment and what it was for. The exclusion of the points from couples G and J produces
a more positively correlated trend line which I believe will change the rho. This was found true,
although the results are not significant, the results obtained did account for the research found in the
introduction. With the pictures of the single males and single females turned upside down and mixed
up we selected one male and then one female, thus creating a random couple. Recruiting Lifecycle.
RMS Resume. Bonus Tracker. Phone Setting for Show. Cause and analysis was the appropriate
method for this investigation as it provides information on the strength of a relationship between
specific variables. First they were told to fill in a questionnaire, after which they were told that they
had been allocated an ideal partner for the evening of the dance. People may rate attractiveness in a
totally different way. For example, Newcomb (1961) provided students with rent-free
accommodation in exchange for completed questionnaires concerning attitudes and values. Are
shaped by communication Influence how we communicate Are fluid A process. If the participant
does not wish to withdraw their data then the interviewer should keep the questionnaire at the top of
the pile of completed questionnaires. What Is Love?. Difficult to define special attitude with
behavioral and emotional components different things to different people difficult to measure. Only
on photograph 4 did they seem to rate the male in conjunction with the score they gave to the female
of that couple (see appendix). I believe a correlation of 0.564 was not achieved due to a number of
reasons, the main one being rogue results. This would make both the bride and the groom, however
specially the bride, look more attractive. The best place to achieve all this is the library, as all these
factors are eliminated due to the common environment of a library. This finding provides support for
the Matching hypothesis as it shows that individuals in a real couple are more similar in physical
attractiveness than random couples. In cognition, stress is defined as the state of mental or emotional
strain resulting from adverse or demanding circumstances. For example in order for me to get the
average score for the male in the real couple A, I added all of the scores he received and divided that
number by 20 (the number of participants who rated him). As the observed value is higher than the
critical value, the alternative hypothesis is accepted, and the null hypothesis is rejected. There was no
statistically relevant correlation between males and females based on the Rho so therefore the null
hypothesis is accepted even though there is a slight positive correlation (0.272) but this is not
statistically relevant. They found that physical attractiveness was the single biggest predictor of how
much each date had been liked by both male and the female participants. University students made
the sample up and for this reason it means it is not possible to generalise the findings to a wider
population other than the one studied. Secondly it is suitable for my hypothesis as the males and
females both came from one couple and therefore were related. The students filling out the
questionnaires were under the assumption that the results from their questionnaires would determine
their ideal partner for the dance. They were asked to rate the physical attractiveness of the
individuals on a scale of 1-10. Include romantic relationships, but also friendships, working
relationships, relationships with family members, etc. The participants will then be presented with
forms like the record sheet (appendix). Participants were also asked to rate the photos as a couple.
This shows that couples G and J were definite anomalies and also that without these anomalies a
statistically significant, positive correlation would be achieved and that would allow me to reject my
null and accept my alternative hypothesis (also providing evidence for the matching hypothesis).
These pairings however, had been made at random on basis of their physical attractiveness. Cause
and analysis was the appropriate method for this investigation as it provides information on the
strength of a relationship between specific variables. My hypothesis would be that the more attracted
the couples are to each other the longer their marriage would last. It can be concluded that any
differences in results are not due to chance alone. A very different finding was observed from the
1966 study in that the student participants selected an individual who was of a similar level of
physical attractiveness to themselves. After the dance the students were asked whether they liked
their date and whether they would go out with them again. If the ratings are similar between real
couples then this would provide support for the matching hypothesis. Furthermore, due to the small
sample size of photographs used, within 2 rank positions may suggest matched physical
attractiveness, when in actual fact it is probable there are vast jumps between the positions. This
would make both the bride and the groom, however specially the bride, look more attractive. The
participants were asked to rate each of the people on the questionnaire on their physical
attractiveness with a score between 1 and 10 (1 being the lowest and 10 being the highest). When
being asked to rate the males in the photographs, male participants seemed to feel strange about
rating them high, even a fair ranking appeared extremely difficult for them to do. These studies
generally show that people rated as being of high, low or average attractiveness tend to choose
partners of a corresponding level of attractiveness. For example the more body language they have
towards each other it increases the rate of attraction between them. Students between the ages of 16-
18 may not find 30yr old attractive at all so both participants and couples should be of the same
background. Mursteins research was carried out 36 years ago which may mean the matching
hypothesis is not of great relevance today. A Replication of the Study by Murstein Investigating the
Matching Hypothesi. For this reason I decided to reject my alternative hypothesis and accept the
null. This would mean that there was not an actual romantic relationship formed between some of
the couples and this could offset some results (possibly couple G and J). This is, a confounding
variable, as she is perceived to look more attractive than she actually is. Results showed students
expressed the most liking for those who matched them in physical attractiveness, contradicting the
original findings. As a result, this objective drives scientists to perform scientific analysis to identify
differences in perceived. Examples which are relevant for females being attracted to males can
include height and physique. This shows similar physical attraction is not the only decider when
individuals are looking for a partner. This is an evolutionary take on the formation of relationships
and provides support for the sociobilogical theory. This would be impossible to do so if the
photographs were separated. Separate photographs were taken of the partners, which were then
rated for attractiveness by independent judges. If the participant agrees to complete the questionnaire
then the interviewer says, “thank you” and hands the questionnaire to the participant along with a
pen. The best place to achieve all this is the library, as all these factors are eliminated due to the
common environment of a library. Over a time span of one year, 2003 to 2004, suicide amongst
children, especially teens has risen drastically.
Upon completion of the questionnaire they handed it to us. It is thought that all humans would go for
the more attractive individual available but would be worried that this person would then accept a
better offer and leave. The 20 photographs we asked you to rank were 10 long term couples. Huston
(1973) suggested that people were afraid of being rejected by their prospective partners. This was
because 60% of the couples who were similar in physical attractiveness engaged in intimate actions
(hugging, holding hands etc.) as opposed to 22% in the couples who were not similar in physical
attractiveness. They were asked to rate the physical attractiveness of the individuals on a scale of 1-
10. For example, on photograph 2, 2 female participants number 19 rated the male as 7 however only
rates the female 5, unlike most female participants who consistently ranked the female higher than
the male. This shows similar physical attraction is not the only decider when individuals are looking
for a partner. By looking at the results for my real couples the average difference between 6 of the
couples was less than 1.0 and the difference between 3 of them was less than 0.5. When compared to
the random couples only 2 of them have an average difference below 1.0. This shows some support
for the matching hypothesis and the hypothesis I made. First they were told to fill in a questionnaire,
after which they were told that they had been allocated an ideal partner for the evening of the dance.
It can be concluded that any differences in results are not due to chance alone. The individuals in the
picture had to be white American or European and also be within an age range of 18-. Also couple 5
with 200 points (second highest score) received 10 marks for the matching hypothesis (second
lowest). Aligning human resources with current and future needs is a significant challenge for
organizations. In this sense it shows that the findings of the stu dy cannot be generalised as the
process to gain the findings is not representative of normal actions. The average employee's
recruitment, selection, placement, and training can take several months. This would be impossible to
do so if the photographs were separated. The Rho of this experiment was 0.2727273, for the results
to be statistically significant the Rho had to be equal to or greater than 0.564. As this experiment was
below this it was statistically infrequent and the null hypothesis was accepted. I would use
approximately 10 photos, as it would give an easy average to work with. These studies generally
show that people rated as being of high, low or average attractiveness tend to choose partners of a
corresponding level of attractiveness. Factors such as; proximity, body language, facial features,
humour etc. Alina Eagle Department of Psychology, University of Warwick Abstract The aim of the
study was to examine the validity of the matching hypothesis. With the results collected we were
able to carry out a correlational analysis. We then fully debriefed the participant and gave them the
opportunity to withdraw their data if they wished to. Murstein (1972) carried out his study on actual
long term couples. In the study photographs of real couples (who were either engaged or in a stable
relationship) were rated as more similar in physical attractiveness than for random couples created for
comparison. What was discovered was that males continuously rank other males much lower than
they rank the females in the photographs, for example male number 2 rated the male in photograph 1
only 2 points, whereas he rated the female of the couple 8 points. As this study suggests physical
similarity doesn't denote itself as an important mate selection criteria, we may therefore be assured
that appearances aren't all that matter. The participants are all from Newcastle upon Tyne, they were
chosen as they were using the school library at the time of the investigation been carried out.