Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=sam.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the
scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that
promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
http://www.jstor.org
THE THORNY OYSTER AND THE VOICE OF GOD:
SPONDYLUS AND STROMBUS IN ANDEAN PREHISTORY
ALLISON C. PAULSEN
597
598 AMERICAN ANTIQUITY [Vol. 39, No. 4, 1974
czzin
'zIzZfEUUinEZaZ
o0 2 3 4 5 cm 10
Fig. la. The Painted Thorny Oyster Spondylus pictorum lower California. Negative 287015.
A. 2800 to 1100 B.C., when shell from coastal Ecuador was traded only as far as the
Ecuadoriansierra;
B. 1100 to 100 B.C., when the tradingarea expanded south, and the Ecuadorianshell became
entrenchedin the cultureof the centralAndes;and
C. 100 B.C. to A.D. 1532, when the total exchange areareachedfrom Quito to LakeTiticaca.
The data from each period will be interdigitatedby first describingthe shell assemblagein south
coastal Ecuadorand any items of reverseexchangefoundt the n cite coeval distribution
and the sociocultural context of Spondylus and Strombus in areas away from the Ecuadorian
coast. Since the shells often, but not always,occur as an associatedpairin these areas,the presence
of either should not be assumedwithout specific mention. Finally, I shall try to assimilateall this
diversematerialand attempt to come to some very generalconclusions about the two shells and
the implications of their changingroles in Andean prehistory.This concentrationupon items of
interregionalexchange may draw attention to economic factors that are not alwaysemphasizedin
Andeanstudies.
As yet we have little informationabout the specific trade routes, means of transportation,or
actual mechanismsof exchange involved in this long-distancemovement of local specialties.The
archaeologicaldistribution of Spondylus and Strombus suggeststhat, in general, the main trade
routes between coastal Ecuadorand Peru ran along the Andean spine, with secondarypathways
branching down the river valleys (Fig. 2). At least one ethnohistorian (Rostworowski 1970)
believes that Spondylus in bulk was shipped south to Peru by boat, but there is now no evidence
to indicate how early coastal shippingmay have begun. Aboriginalvesselswere entirely capableof
makinglong coastal voyages, but the date when such craft were first introduced is still uncertain
(Clinton R. Edwards,personalcommunication).They were probablynot in use as early as period
A, when contacts between the coasts of Ecuadorand Peru were almost nonexistent. It is also an
open question wther culturalfactors, and not the availabillityof seaworthy transport,dictated
any prehistoric choice between maritime a overlandnd exchange routes (Clinton R. Edwards,
personal communication). Finally, it seems only reasonableto suppose that Andean exchange
systems, like Andean society itself, underwent
fundamental changesduringthe evolution from the
small-scalelocal communitiesof period A to the enormouspan-Andeanempiresof periodC. Thus,
we should not assumethat all the featuresof this exchangepatternremainedunchangedduringthe
4000 years of its history.
A
A
,ivio A
LA LIBERTADI
*A
CHANDU ^ CA AR
EL OR
TUMA AI ' \
A
*TALARA
uayurco
A
If
A
A A
A *PINILAA
A
\ ^ A
^!
dates no later than the end of Machalilla,or about 1100 B.C., and some may be considerably
older, as Braunhas suggested.
No Spondylus or Strombusyet reported from any archaeologicalsite in Peru can be securely
dated before 1100 B.C., that is, before the end of the Machalillaoccupation of south coastal
Ecuador.However, perhapssuch specimens will turn up, if similaritiesbetweenMachalillapottery
and certain ceramics from Chavfn de Huantarand Kotosh reflect reciprocal direct or indirect
contacts between the Ecuadorian coast and the central Andean sierra (Paulsen and McDougle
1974).
All this indicates that duringthe Early Horizon,Spondylusand Strombuswere elite insigniain
ceremonialcenters and in burialsin the sierraand coast of the centralAndes.
In contrast to the Early Horizon, neither Spondylus nor Strombus are representedin pottery
duringthe EarlyIntermediateperiod.
In Middle Horizon 2, contemporarywith Guangala6, 7, and 8 (Paulsenn.d.), Spondylus and
Strombus continued to be associated together and with copper. In Pinilla, near Ica, a Middle
Horizon 2 (Paulsen 1968) burialwas accompaniedby both workedand unworkedSpondylus,and
by gold and copper ornaments.A Middle Horizon 2 cache at Pikillaqtain the lower Cuzco valley
consisted of "2 valvesof a Spondylusshell, a Strombusshell, and a copper bar"(Menzel 1968:51).
Specialnote should be made of a woven hangingfrom Pachacamac,the centralcoast ceremonial
center where an important oracle was located duringthe Middle and Late Horizons. One side of
this hanging was embellished with a series of whole immatureSpondylus shells, and the reverse
with copper ornaments. It was apparentlypart of the ritual paraphernaliasurroundinga Middle
Horizonwooden figure(Kosok 1965:39) that embodied the physicalpresenceof the oracle.
During the Libertad occupation of the Santa Elena Peninsula, contemporarywith the Late
Intermediate period in Peru, Spondylus beads continued to be associated with copper at La
Libertad(Bushnell 1951:99, 112), but importationof both copper and obsidianprobablytapered
off at this time, for both are reportedly rare (Bushnell 1951:115) and none have been found in
Libertad stratigraphictests (Paulsen n.d.). This narrowingof extrapeninsularconnections is also
reflected in the stylistic affinities of the Libertadpottery style, which has links only as far distant
as Mantaand the GuayasBasin.
One Libertad sherd has been found in a Sechura site near Talaraiin northwest Peru (James
Richardson,personalcommunication).This sherd is, at present, the only archaeologicalevidence
of tradeby sea between Ecuadorand Peru.
A variety of evidence from Inca and early Spanish times, postdating Libertad,helps flesh out
the bare bones of this artifactualcensus. The Incas used Spondylus shells, either whole, carved,
ground-up,or cut in pieces, as offerings at springs to bring abundantrainfallto newly planted
crops (Rowe 1946:249). An early Quechuatext describesthe wrath of a divinity when the Inca
did not bringhim a servingof Spondylus,the favoritefood of the gods (Murra,1971).
Finally, a single-note trumpet made of a large Strombus shell was used not only as a war
trumpet by the Incas, but is still blown rituallyby some Quechuasat certainpoints in the Roman
Catholicmass (Rowe 1946:290).
CONCLUSIONS
By arrangingthis fragmentaryevidence in a chronological mosaic more than three thousand
years long, we can trace the gradualexpansion of the area of export of Spondylusand Strombus
from its beginnings,possibly in Valdfviatimes, until its widest extent early in the Christianera.
The Ecuadorianshell alreadycited from Peruviansites representsonly a smallsampleof those
finds mentioned in the literature.Whilethe volume of export from Ecuadorcannot be estimated
with any precision,we recognizethat it must have been of massiveproportions,since the shells not
only accompanied the wide expansion of Chavfn,but had penetratedevery part of the Peruvian
sierraand coast by the beginningof the EarlyIntermediateperiod.
At their source on the coast of Ecuador,the two kinds of shell were used for tools as well as for
ornaments, and they were never a dyadic pair on the coast as they were away from their native
habitat. Away from the coast or in Peru, however, Spondylus is almost invariablyprofoundly
modified and found in the form of small ornamentsor jewelry or in context suggestingelite or
ritual associations.Strombus was not carved or otherwise modified, but it was sometimesincised
with ritual themes. Yet the two mollusks were constantly paired at Peruviansites, not only as
actual specimens of shell, but also in symbolic representationsin sculpturedand ceramic forms.
These features of manufacture,usage, and associationsuggest that, althoughthe two species were
ritually linked, the importanceof Spondylus lay immanent in the materialitself, while Strombus'
role was functionaland perhapssubordinate.
Until the middle of the second millenniumB.C., Spondylus was traded only as far as Cafiar,
where figurinesjoined the previousrepertoireof shell artifacts.At this early period, as throughout
subsequentAndeanprehistory,both Spondylusand Strombusare found as exchangegoods only at
trade centers situated on major avenuesof communication,reflectingthe attractionof such goods
604 AMERICAN ANTIQUITY [Vol. 39, No. 4, 1974
goods, including food ... and (also) served to redistribute the population from areas of high
population to areas of lower density" (Ottenberg 1958:311). Greek oracles, too, were consulted
when new colonies were to be established.
Oracles have appeared in many complex societies from Mesopotamiato Polynesia, but not
many of the circumstancesof their originhave been retrievedfrom the preliteratepast. All seem to
have developed at a stage in sociocultural evolution when religion was being institutionalized
(Gibson 1961:35). We might postulate that a patternof oracleswould be likely to materializepari
passu with increasedpopulation density, growth of social stratification,and the appearanceof a
true state.
Chavfnexhibits all these evolutionarysymptoms. And the continuity proposedfrom the Great
Image of Phase AB at Chavin de Huantarthrough the Middle Horizon to the Inca oracles at
Pachacamacis further strengthenedby a predictably consistent associationbetween Spondylus,
Strombus, and the oracle, reflecting a commensuratelyclose link between Andean economic
history and Andeancosmology. If Spondyluswas the visualsymbol of this multiplex pattern,then
Strombusmust have providedboth the voice of the oracleand the sound of the deity.
One nearly unanswerablequestion remains to be asked. Why were Spondylus and Strombus
singled out to express so many layers of socioculturalsignificance?Neither mollusk could have
been an item of diet away from the seacoast. The reference to Spondylus as food of the gods is
peculiarlyappropriate:by the time one reachedthe highlands,only a supernaturaldigestioncould
have eaten it and survived.
Somewhat lamely one can only say that a combination of exotic provenience and natural
propertiesmust have helped determinethe special status of these tropical shellfish in the central
Andes. Strombus is a naturaltrumpet, while the forbiddingprotrusionsof the thorny oyster not
only set it apart from other marine mollusks, but are somehow suited to the powerful
grotesqueriesof the Chavfnstyle.
Both animalsare also membersof a pool of biota seemingly invested with mythic powers the
world around. For example, one of the two objects traded in the Trobriandkula ring was a
necklace called soulava, made from beads of Spondylus collected and fabricated during ceremonies
including the ritual blowing of a Strombus trumpet (Malinowski 1961 :367-375). Another Chavin
supernatural, the eagle, is also found among the ceremonial monuments in Washington, D.C., at
the recent end of a genealogy traceable to Bronze Age Greece, when it was a symbol of both the
power and an oracle of Zeus. We all know-or hope we know-that these global coincidencesare
no more than that.
This paper is a slightly altered version of one presented May 5, 1972 at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Society
for American Archaeology in Bal Harbour, Florida.
Acknowledgments. Clinton R. Edwards, Betsy D. Hill, Donald W. Lathrap, John V. Murra, Presley Norton,
Thomas C. Patterson, James Richardson, and Karen Stothert have generously given me comments, criticisms, and
access to unpublished data which have been incorporated in this paper. I am solely responsible for any omissions
or misinterpretation.
Braun, Robert
1971 Cerro Narrfo reanalyzed: the Formative as seen from the southern Ecuadorian highlands. Paper read at
the Primer Simposio de Correlaciones Antropolo6gicas Andino-Mesoamericano, July, 1971, Salinas,
Ecuador. To be published in the proceedings of the Symposium.
Bushnell, G. H. S.
1951 The archaeology of the Santa Elena Peninsula in south-west Ecuador. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge.
Collier, Donald, and John V. Murra
1943 Survey and excavations in southern Ecuador. Anthropological Series 35, Field Museum of Natural
History. Chicago.
Estrada, Emilio, Betty J. Meggers, and Clifford Evans, Jr.
1964 The Jambeli culture of south coastal Ecuador. Proceedings of the United States National Museum
115(3492):483-558. Washington, D.C.
Fried, Morton H.
1967 The evolution of political society. New York.
606 AMERICAN ANTIQUITY [Vol. 39, No. 4, 1974