Shahana Rahim filed a divorce petition against her husband Atiqul Haque Chowdhury claiming unpaid dowry and child maintenance for their newborn baby. Atiqul had extramarital affairs and tortured Shahana, who left to live with her family. The family court ordered Atiqul to pay half the dowry owed to Shahana and 500 taka per month in child support. On further appeal, the district court increased the child support to 500 taka per month until the child reaches puberty and ordered full payment of the dowry. The high court upheld this ruling, stating Shahana could claim unpaid dowry within six years of talaq e-tafweez (divorce by
Shahana Rahim filed a divorce petition against her husband Atiqul Haque Chowdhury claiming unpaid dowry and child maintenance for their newborn baby. Atiqul had extramarital affairs and tortured Shahana, who left to live with her family. The family court ordered Atiqul to pay half the dowry owed to Shahana and 500 taka per month in child support. On further appeal, the district court increased the child support to 500 taka per month until the child reaches puberty and ordered full payment of the dowry. The high court upheld this ruling, stating Shahana could claim unpaid dowry within six years of talaq e-tafweez (divorce by
Shahana Rahim filed a divorce petition against her husband Atiqul Haque Chowdhury claiming unpaid dowry and child maintenance for their newborn baby. Atiqul had extramarital affairs and tortured Shahana, who left to live with her family. The family court ordered Atiqul to pay half the dowry owed to Shahana and 500 taka per month in child support. On further appeal, the district court increased the child support to 500 taka per month until the child reaches puberty and ordered full payment of the dowry. The high court upheld this ruling, stating Shahana could claim unpaid dowry within six years of talaq e-tafweez (divorce by
47 DLR (1995), 301 ❖ Plaintiff no.1- Shahana Rahim ❖ Plaintiff no.2- the new borned baby ❖ Defendant- Atiqul Haque Chowdhury Here the plaintiff no. 1 married with the Defendant on 1st October of 1982. They registered the marriage under the marriage registration at 1974 at the same date. After few months Plaintiff no. 1 got pregnant. Unfortunately the defendant had extramarital affairs then and tortured the Plaintiff no.1. Plaintiff no.1 then move to his paternal home. After two years of their marriage Plaintiff no. 1 file a divorce petition against the defendant claiming the dower and necessary maintenance for the Plaintiff no. two. The defendant denied to pay the dower as he paid the dower before and accepted the maintenance of the child to 200 taka per month. In the family court the judge Asked The defendant to pay the due half dower to the plaintiff no. 1 & set the maintenance of the newborn child to 500 taka per month untill the next marriage of the Plaintiff no. 1. In the further appeal by the defendant the district judge commended to the defendant to pay the full dower and the maintenance of the newborn child to 500 per month until he or she achieves puberty. The high court then held that according to the limitation at the claiming of dower is valid until the expiration of six years of talaq e-tafweez (divorce by wife). So at the end of the day the defendant lose the suit and held obligated to provide the unsettled dower and maintenance of his newborn baby.