Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Submitted by
AASHA SABITHA.K.M.S
(Reg.No: 922619631001)
MAY–2021
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
I, AASHA SABITHA K.M.S (Reg.No: 922619631001) hereby declare that the project
report entitled, “A STUDY ON IMPACT OF JOB ENRICHMENT AND
EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION IN PSJ METALS, DINDIGUL” submitted by me to
the Anna university, Chennai, in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of
degree of MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION under the guidance of Mr.
R. SHANMUGANATHAN MBA., ME, is my original work.
Key Words: Job enrichment, Motivation, Quality of work life, Self Development.
CHAPTER - I
1.1. INTRODUCTION
JOB ENRICHMENT:
The current research project is based on job enrichment .the the new changes
both is science and technology and business environment have brought a change in
functional approach of an organization. The human resource executive plays a
significant role to set and achieve the objective.
DEFINITION:
Job enrichment is an addition to a job of task that increasing the amount of
employee control or responsibility. It’s a vertical expansion of a job as opposed to a the
horizontal expansion of a job
ROTATE JOB:
Give people the opportunity to use a Varity of skills and perform different kind
of work. The mostcommon way to do this is through job rotation.
COMBINED TASK:
Combined work active to provide more challenging and complex work
assignment .this can significantly increase task identity because people see a job
through start to finish. This allows workers used a wide Varity of skills, which can
make the work seem meaningful and important.
1
IDENTIFY PROJECT FOCUSED WORK UNIT:
Break your typical functional lines and form project focused work unit. The
main objective of the project is to understand the job enrichment and employee
motivation in detail by interacting with the management, supervision and workers and
to see how far the various measures are implemented and bring out the draw back if
any and recommended for the betterment of system. Secondly to critically evaluate the
job enrichment impact on employee motivation as well as on absenteeism and turnover.
At last study the most extensive change thosecritical for high motivation performance.
MOTIVATION:
Motivation is derived from the word ‘ motive ‘means any idea ,need ,emotion or
organic state prompts a man to action. Motive is an internal factor that integrates a
behavior . as they motive is within the individual ,it is necessary to study needs,
emotions etc. in order to motivate him to work .
DEFINITION:
According to Likert, “It is the core of management which shows that every
human being gives him a sense of worth in face-to face groups which are most
2
important to him….A supervisor should strive to treat individuals with dignity and a
recognition of their personal worth.”
Motivation is a process if getting the needs of the people realized with a view to
induces them to work for the accomplishment of organization objective indeed,
motivation is nothing but an action of inducement. Motivation is an behavioral concept.
it seeks to understand why people behave as they do.
The efficiency of a person depends on two factors, firstly, the level of ability to
do certain work, secondly the willingness to do work. So for as the first factor it
concerned it can be acquired by education and training, but the second factor can be
created motivation. A person may have several needs and desires. Its only strongly felt
needs which motives become. Thus motives are product of need and desires motives
are many and keep on changing with time motives are invisible and directed towards
certain goal.
3
1.2. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM:
The primary concern of any organization is its viability and hence it’s an
efficiency every organization needs to have effective human resources functions.
Which includes the employees productivity, enrichment and enhancement? Now this
study reveals the job enrichment and motivation among the employees in the
organisation. As they are different departments in the organization. It is difficult to get
the appropriate information from all departments. As per company norms, it follows
certain policies and procedures for the betterment & wellness of their employees.
In context of Statutory, all policies and procedures in a legal way, this study
mainly focuses the factors which made an impactions between the job enrichment and
the motivation among the employees of this organisation. So the study is bounded to
labour productivity and turnover and exact by focus on the efficiency and analyzing the
level of satisfaction towards the programs and finally giving the suggestions and
conclusion to the organizations.
4
1.3. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY:
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
➢ A study on impact on job enrichment and employee motivation in PSJ
metals, Dindigul.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
➢ To analysis the autonomy of the employers in PSJ metal.
➢ To identify the job enrichment and motivation of employers in the company.
➢ To study on extrinsic and intrinsic motivation employers.
➢ To assures the motivation capabilities of the employers.
➢ To study about the personal growth of the employers.
➢ To find the suggestion on the basis of findings of the report.
5
1.5. INDUSTRY PROFILE
ORIGIN OF AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY
The automobile was first invented and perfected in Germany and France in the
late 1800s, though Americans quickly came to dominate the automotive industry in the
first half of the twentieth century. Henry Ford innovated mass –production techniques
that became standard, and Ford, General Motors and Chrysler emerged as the “Big
Three” auto companies’ by the 1920s.
Manufacturers funneled their resources to the military during World War II, and
afterward automobile production in Europe and Japan soared to meet growing demand.
Once vital to the expansion of American urban centers, the industry had become a
shared global enterprise with the rise of Japan as the leading automaker by
1980.Although the automobile was to have its greatest social and economic impact in
the United States, it was initially perfected in Germany and France toward the end of
the nineteenth century by such men as Gottlieb Daimler, Karl Benz, Nicolaus Otto and
Emile Levassor.
The history of the Indian automobile industry comprises of three qualitatively distinct
periods:
a) The first phase, 1928 – 1955 dominated by import and assembly activity.
During the British regime, India had no auto industry to begin with and all the
automobiles were imported from the global auto manufacturers such as General
Motors and Ford Motors. In the 1940s, Hindustan Motors and Premier Motors
were established by Indian entrepreneurs, by importing know-how from
General Motors and Fiat respectively,
b) The next phase, 1955-1974 should be characterized as the phase of import
substitution and emergence of indigenous automobile manufacture and
industry’s maturity towards self-reliance. In the 1950s, a few companies such as
Mahindra and Mahindra, Ashok Motors (with technical collaboration with
Leyland Motors) and Bajaj Auto entered the market for commercial vehicles
and two wheelers. Most of them either imported auto – components or produced
them in house. Later on as a result of the L.K. Jha committee’s
recommendations in 1960 indigenous ancillaries sector evolved as a separate
auto components sector,
6
c) The third period spans since the mid 70’s and thereafter is marked by structural
adjustments and liberalization. The automobile industry in India, the tenth
largest in the world with an annual production of approximately 2 million units
is expected to become one of the major global automobile industries in the
coming years. A number of domestic companies produce automobiles in India
and the growing presence of multinational investment, too, has led to an
increase in overall growth.
The global auto industry is a key sector of the economy for every major country in
the world. Today, the Indian automobile industry presents a galaxy of varieties and
models meeting all possible expectations and globally established industry standards.
Some of the leading names echoing in the Indian automobile industry include Maruti
Suzuki, Tata Motors, Mahindra and Mahindra, Hyundai Motors, Hero Honda and
Hindustan Motors in addition to a number of others. During the early stages of its
development, Indian automobile industry heavily depended on foreign technologies.
However, over the years, the manufacturers in India have started using their own
technology evolved in the native soil. The thriving market place in the country has
attracted a number of automobile manufacturers including some of the reputed global
leaders to set their foot in the soil looking forward to enhance their profile and
prospects to new heights.
OVERVIEW OF AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY:
The Automobile Industry is comprised primarily of the world’s largest
passenger automobile and light truck manufacturers. Through broad dealership
networks, most members of the industry sell vehicles in the global market, covering
developed and emerging countries.
Automotive manufacturers offer a variety of makes and models, though there
tends to be limited brand integration at the marketing, advertising, and dealership
levels. The bulk of these companies operate production facilities in multiple geographic
regions.
REVENUE STREAMS:
Automobile manufacturers are subject to the demands of a vast international
pool of customers. Economic conditions affect overall industry sales. Car lot traffic
perks up during a boom period, and empty showrooms are commonplace during a
downturn. Driving habits can change according to the economic cycle, and therefore,
7
product lineups are always shifting, with new models, innovations, and technologies
being developed to meet these demands. As a result, dealerships try to showcase a wide
range of offerings, from small compact cars to sedans to light trucks and sport-utility
vehicles (SUVs). Drivers’ tastes and finances are varied and often change. Thus,
showrooms will often have sports, economy, family, and luxury cars on hand to meet
customers’ desires. Luxury brands, with their high quality standards and advanced
features, sell at premium prices and carry rich margins.
COSTS & EXPENSES:
The auto industry is both capital and labor-intensive. These companies have to
manage numerous costs and expenses associated with facilities, materials, parts,
equipment, product development, and employment. At times, the prices of key raw
materials, such as steel, can surge to record levels, requiring a nimble hedging strategy.
Research & development and marketing and advertising expenses will have a
discernable impact on the cost budget, as well. Too, given the seasonal nature of
demand and new product launches, effective working capital management is crucial in
supporting sales and controlling costs and expenses.
The cost of labor has a big impact on competitiveness and profitability. North
American and European manufacturers are heavily unionized. Though their power and
influence has been waning for a number of years, members of the United Auto
Workers, for instance, still make up a good portion of the U.S. and Canadian work
forces and have an effect on the industry’s health. Medical and pension benefits are
substantial and can be a competitive disadvantage, especially compared to car makers
based in Asia, where wage costs are lower.
Domestic union salary and benefit concessions, and import tariffs, help to
narrow the price advantage of foreign competitors. Over its history, the American
automotive industry has built up considerable scale and, at the same time, weighty
pension and healthcare obligations. U.S. manufacturers have had to rely on debt to
maintain operations and pay out benefits. Interest expense is significant. Production
plant and dealer network consolidations have become common in an effort to protect
net profits. Domestic companies have suffered market share losses over the longer
term.
8
EVOLUTION OF INDIAN AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY:
The Investment Information and Credit Rating Agency of India (ICRA, 2003)
studies the competitiveness of the Indian auto industry, by globally comparisons of
macro environment, policies and cost structure. This has a detailed account on the
evolution of the global auto industry. The United States was the first major players
from 1900 to 1960, after which Japan took its place as the cost-efficient leader. Cost
efficiency being the only real means in as mature an industry as automobiles to retain
or improve market share, global auto manufacturers have been sourcing from the first-
tier OEMs since late 1980s. There are only a few dominant Indian OEMs, while the
number of OEMs is very large in China (122 car manufacturers and 120 motor cycle
manufacturers). While the genesis of Indian automotive industry can be traced to the
1940’s distinct growth decades started in the 1970’s. Between 1970 and 1984 cars were
considered a luxury product; manufacturing was licensed, expansion was restricted;
there were quantitative restriction (QR) on imports and a tariff structure designed to
restrict the market. The market was dominated by six manufactures- Telco (now Tata
Motors), Ashok Leyland, Mahindra & Mahindra, Hindustan Motors, Premier
Automobiles and Bajaj Auto. The decades of 1985 to 1995 show the entry of Maruti
Udyog in the passenger car segment and Japanese manufacturers in the two wheelers
and light commercial vehicle segments. Economic liberalization, stated in 1991, led to
the delicensing of the passenger car segment in 1993. QR on imports continued. This
decade witnessed the emergence of Hero Honda as a major player in the two wheeler
segments and Maruti Udyog as the market leader in the passenger car segment.
Between 1995 and 2000 several international players entered the market. Advanced
technology was introduced to meet competitive pressures, and environmental and
safety imperative.
Automobile companies started investing in service network to support
maintenance of on-road vehicles. Auto financing started emerging as an important
driver for demand. Starting in 2000, several landmark policy changes like removal of
quantitative restrictions (QR) and 100 percent FDI through automatic route were
introduced. Indigenously developed (Made in India) vehicles were introduced in the
domestic market and exports were given a thrust. Auto companies started collaboration
with financial firms to provide auto financing and insurance services to customers.
9
Manufacturers also introduced systems to improve capacity utilization and adopted
quality and environmental management systems.
In 2003, Core-group on Automotive R&D (C.A.R) was set up to identify
priority areas for automotive R&D in India. Rising per capita income and changing
demographic distribution are conductive for growth. India has the highest proportion of
population below 35 years, 70% (potential buyers), which means that 130 million
people will get added to the working population between 2003 and 2009. The trends
indicate that small and medium cars would remain dominant and a shift towards high
end cars is expected at a faster rate. The SUV market is expected to develop rapidly in
future. Higher disposable incomes coupled with availability of easy finance options
have driven the passenger vehicle segment.
In the commercial vehicle segment, increased investment in road infrastructure
and availability of cheaper finance has led to a growth in multi axle vehicles. This is
expected to be followed by a shift to tractors-trailer combinations on account of
operating economics of higher power-to weight ratio vehicles. Growth in the demand
for pick-up trucks has coincided with the growth in multi axle vehicles. The nest
growth driver for LCVs is expected to be the introduction of lighter pick-ups.
The two wheeler segment growth is led by rapid urbanization and resultant
raised in demand from semi-urban and rural areas, increasing income levels, and wider
product range available to customers and easy finance options. The growth in tractor
industry is linked with the growth in agricultural output and exports to neighboring
countries. Auto component industry growth is directly linked to the growth of
automobile industry since more than 65% sales is to the OEMs. However, in recent
years, component exports are becoming an important growth driver and it is expected
to assume greater importance in future.
GLOBAL SCENARIO OF INDIAN AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY:
The industry being highly capital intensive, has entry barriers for smaller
players. Even the existing global auto majors themselves are realigning their production
bases coming closer to the scene of action in Asia – Pacific region, mainly in China,
India and Thailand. Besides the above, the constant pressure for cost reduction on
OEMs is compelling them to outsource more and more components from low cost
countries.
10
The changing scenario has opened up opportunities for Indian automobile
industry. India, with huge domestic market, rapidly growing purchasing power, and
market linked exchange rate and well established financial market and stable corporate
governance framework is emerging as an attractive destination for new investments in
this sector.
The rapid improvement in infrastructure including road, port, power and world
class facilities for testing, certification and homologation coupled with availability of
manpower and enabling government policies to promote fair competition and make
Indian automotive industry more competitive in world besides making the country a
favourable destination for investment by global majors in auto industry.
11
status. Development policies and plans are discussed as well as manufacturing
processes and cost structures are also analyzed. This report additionally states
import/export consumption, supply and demand Figures, cost, price, revenue, and gross
margin.
12
1.6. COMPANY PROFILE
13
➢ Upper bracket 3mm thk
➢ Foot rest pillion 2mm thk
➢ Engine mounting 4mm thk
➢ Auto lever 6mm thk
➢ Lower plate 3.5 mm thk
➢ Bracket silencer mounting 3mm thk
➢ Gusset sub frame 4 mm thk
➢ Mounting bracket lower
14
• Ensure on time product delivery to customer and improve towards achieving
100%,
• Strive to achieve 100% customer satisfaction,
• Reduce wastage by 10% through improvement in methods and system,
• Training and development of employee on QMS practices.
15
13 HRP 2500 - 3.5
14 HRP 2500 1250 4.0 47
15 HR 2500 1250 4.0 52
16 HRP 2500 1250 4.5 111
17 HR 2438 1219 4.5 19
18 HRP 2438 1219 5.0 53
THEORETICAL BACKGROUND:
The current research project is based on JOB ENRICHMENT. The new changes
both in science and technology and business environment have brought a change in
functional approach of an industrial organization. The human resource executive plays
a significant role to set and achieve the objectives as the functional horizon is extended
from legalistic mundane approach to humanrelation.
Employees are not perceived as human resource, as some human resource
experts have termedthe human resource as “knowledge capital” of the organization.
16
do to make the jobs you offer more satisfying? (By reducing recruitment costs,
increasing retention of experienced staff and motivating them to perform at a high
level; you can have a real impact on the bottom line.)
One of the key factors in good job design is job enrichment. This is the practice
of enhancing individual jobs to make the responsibilities more rewarding and inspiring
for the people who do them.
Job enrichment, you expand the task set that someone performs. You provide
more stimulating and interesting work that adds variety and challenge to an
employee’s daily routine. This increases the depth of the job and allows people to
have more control over their work. The central focus of job enrichment is giving
people more control over their work (lack of control is a key cause of stress, and
therefore of unhappiness.) Where possible, allow them to take on tasks that are
typically done by supervisors. This means that they have more influence over
planning, executing, and evaluating the jobs they do. In enriched jobs, people
complete activities with increased freedom, independence, and responsibility. They
also receive plenty of feedback, so that they can assess and correct their own
performance.
Here are some strategies you can use to enrich jobs in your workplace:
• Rotate Jobs – Give people the opportunity to use a variety of skills, and
perform different kinds of work. The most common way to do this is through
job rotation. Move your workers through a variety of jobs that allow them to
see different parts of the organization learn different skills and acquire
different experiences. This can be very motivating, especially for people in
jobs that are very repetitive or that focus on only one or two skills.
• Combine Tasks – Combine work activities to provide a more challenging
and complex work assignment. This can significantly increase “task identity”
because people see a job through from start to finish. This allows workers to
use a wide variety of skills, which can make the work seem more meaningful
and important. For example, you can convert an assembly line process, in
which each person does one task, into a process in which one person
assembles a whole unit. You can apply this model wherever you have people
or groups that typically perform only one part of an overall process.
Consider expanding their roles to give them responsibility for the entire
process, or for a bigger part of that process.
17
• Identify Project-Focused Work Units – Break your typical functional lines
and form project-focused units. For example, rather than having all of your
marketing people in one department, with supervisors directing who works
on which project, you could split the department into specialized project
units – specific storyboard creators, copywriters, and designers could all
work together for one client or one campaign. Allowing employees to build
client relationships is an excellent way to increase autonomy, task identity,
and feedback.
• Create Autonomous Work Teams – This is job enrichment at the group
level. Set a goal for a team, and make team members free to determine work
assignments, schedules, rest breaks, evaluation parameters, and the like. You
may even give them influence over choosing their own team members. With
this method, you’ll significantly cut back on supervisory positions, and
people will gain leadership and management skills.
• Implement Participative Management – Allow team members to
participate in decision making and get involved in strategic planning. This is
an excellent way to communicate to members of your team that their input is
important. It can work in any organization – from a very small company,
with an owner/boss who’s used to dictating everything, to a large company
with a huge hierarchy. When people realize that what they say is valued and
makes a difference, they’ll likely be motivated.
• Redistribute Power and Authority – Redistribute control and grant more
authority to workers for making job-related decisions. As supervisors
delegate more authority and responsibility, team members’ autonomy,
accountability, and task identity will increase.
• Increase Employee-Directed Feedback – Make sure that people know how
well, or poorly, they’re performing their jobs. The more control you can give
them for evaluating and monitoring their own performance, the more
enriched their jobs will be. Rather than have your quality control department
go around and point out mistakes, consider giving each team responsibility
for their own quality control. Workers will receive immediate feedback, and
they’ll learn to solve problems, take initiative, and make decisions.
Job enrichment provides many opportunities for people’s development. You’ll
give them lots of opportunity for their task to participate in how their work gets
18
done, and they’ll most-likely enjoy an increased sense of personal responsibility. Job
enrichment is connected to the concept of job enlargement.
Job enrichment is the process of "improving work processes and environments
so they are more satisfying for employees".
Many jobs are monotonous and unrewarding - particularly in the primary and
secondary production industries. Workers can feel dissatisfied in their position due to a
lack of a challenge, repetitive procedures, or an over-controlled authority structure.
Job enrichment tries to eliminate these problems, and bring better performance
to the workplace.There are three key parts to the process of job enrichment
1. Turn employees' effort into performance:
• Ensuring that objectives are well-defined and understood by everyone. The
19
2. Link employee’s performance directly to reward:
• Clear definition of the reward is a must
• Explanation of the link between performance and reward is important
• Make sure the employee gets the right reward if performs well
• If reward is not given, explanation is needed
3. Make sure the employee wants the reward. How to find out?
• Ask them
Job enrichment is a type of job redesign intended to reverse the effects of tasks
that are repetitive requiring little autonomy. Some of these effects are boredom, lack of
flexibility, and employee dissatisfaction (Leach & Wall, 2004). The underlying
principle is to expand the scope of the job with a greater variety of tasks, vertical in
nature, that require self-sufficiency. Since the goal is to give the individual exposure to
tasks normally reserved for differently focused or higher positions, merely adding more
of the same responsibilities related to an employee's current position are not considered
job enrichment. The basis for job enrichment practices is the work done by Frederick
Herzberg in the 1950's and 60's, which was further refined in 1975 by Hackman and
Oldham using what they called the Job Characteristics Model. This model assumes that
if five core job characteristics are present, three psychological states critical to
motivation are produced, resulting in positive outcomes (Kotila, 2001) , not just more
work for them to do. Job enrichment can only be truly successful if planning includes
support for all phases of the initiative. Ohio State University Extension began a job
enrichment program in 1992 and surveyed the participants five years later. The results,
broken down into 3 sub-buckets of data beyond the main grouping of
advantages/disadvantages as shown in Table 1, indicate the University had not fully
considered the planning and administrative aspects of the program (Fourman and Jones,
1997). While the benefits are seemingly obvious, programs fail not because of a lack of
benefits, but rather due to implementation problems. These problems can include a
perception of too great a cost, lack of long-term commitment of resources, and potential
job classification changes (Cunningham and Eberle, 1990).
20
In order for a job enrichment program to produce positive results, worker
needs and organizational needs must be analyzed and acted upon. According to
Cunningham and Eberle (1990), before an enrichment program is begun, the
following questions should be asked:
1. Do employees need jobs that involve responsibility, variety, feedback,
challenge,accountability, significance, and opportunities to learn?
2. What techniques can be implemented without changing the job classification plan?
3. What techniques would require changes in the job classification plan? (p.3)
21
When asked about the successes of a Training Generalist job enrichment program
begun in 2002, Karen Keenan, Learning Manager with Bank of America, stated the
accomplishments were, "greater than expected". The Training Generalist program has
resulted in three successful participants to date. According to Ms. Keenan, positive
results can be directly tied to a program that addressed the strategic goal of greater
resource flexibility without adding to staff, as well as to proper planning, guidance, and
feedback for the participants. Having a voluntary program contributed as well,
attracting a high caliber of individuals eager to expand their skills and be positioned for
advancement. To date, all three Training Generalists have experienced promotions and
additional recognition while affording Ms. Keenan's team financial results and
workload flexibility it could not have otherwise achieved.
A job enrichment program can be a very effective intervention in some
situations where a Performance Technician is faced with a request for motivational
training. Ralph Brown (2004) summed it up very nicely:
Job enrichment doesn't work for everyone. Some people are very resistant to more
responsibility or to opportunities for personal growth, but…researchers report that some
people they expected to resist, seized the opportunity. Enriching jobs is a particularly effective
way to develop employees provided the jobs are truly enriched
22
Elaborating on the importance of human factors, contemporary theories envision
workers as large and often untapped reserves of skills, ideas, and other potential
benefits to an organization. The motivation process, according to this view, involves
tailoring the work environment and incentive structure to harness as much of this
potential as possible. This approach emphasizes granting employees greater flexibility,
power, responsibility, and autonomy so that, to some extent, they may shape their own
work environments as they see fit, while remaining accountable for both favorable and
unfavorable outcomes of their actions.
FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPT
THEORIES APPLIED
Some attempts to bolster employee motivation still consider only extrinsic
rewards. Endless mixes of employee benefits such as health care and life insurance,
profit sharing, employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs), exercise facilities,
subsidized meal plans, child care availability, company cars, and more have been
used by companies in their efforts to maintain happy employees. Although some
experts argue that many of these efforts, if only directed at motivating employees, are
just a waste of company money, it is clear that for certain individuals in certain
scenarios, monetary incentives can stimulate better job performance—at least for a
while.
The debate, rather, has been over whether such material factors have more than
a superficial impact on motivation. Many modern theorists propose that the
motivation an employee feels toward his or her job has less to do with material
rewards such as those described above, than with the design of the job itself. Studies as
far back as 1924 show that simplified, repetitive jobs, for instance, fostered boredom
and the taking of frequent, unauthorized breaks by those who performed them. In 1950
a series of attitude surveys found that highly segmented and simplified jobs resulted in
lower employee morale and output. Other consequences of low employee motivation
include absenteeism and high employee turnover, both very costly for businesses. "Job
enlargement" initiatives began to crop up in major companies in the 1950s, with one
champion of the cause being IBM founder Thomas Watson, Sr. On the academic front,
Turner and Lawrence proposed task attributes that characterize jobs that motivate.
Turner and Lawrence suggest that there are three basic characteristics of a
"motivating" job:
23
1. It must allow a worker to feel personally responsible for a meaningful
portion of the work accomplished. An employee must feel ownership of
and connection to the work he or she performs. Even in team situations, a
successful effort will foster an individual's awareness that his or her
contributions were important in accomplishing the group's tasks.
2. It must provide outcomes which have intrinsic meaning to the individual.
Effective work that does not lead a worker to feel that his or her efforts
matter will not be maintained. The outcome of an employee's work must
have value to him or hers and to others in the organization.
3. It must provide the employee feedback about his or her
accomplishments. A constructive, believable critique of the work
performed is crucial to a worker's continuance or improvement of that
which has already been performed.
In 1971 Hackman and Lawler tested these ideas. Using a telephone company as a test
site, they surveyed 200 employees to determine relationships between employee
attitudes and behavior and the characteristics of the employee's job. The study also
assessed whether an employee's reaction to his or her work was dependent upon
particular kinds of satisfactions valued by the employee. Positive correlations were
found to exist between the quality of an employee's job, with quality jobs meeting the
three criteria above, and positive employee attitudes and behavior. Further, "doing
well" at a job was interpreted by the employee as having put in a high quality
performance, rather than a high quantity performance. Employees felt positively when
they had accomplished something they felt was meaningful, and strove to do so if given
an encouraging opportunity.
MOTIVATION TOOLS:
The methods of motivating employees today are as numerous and different as
the companies operating in the global business environment. What is the nature of the
company and its industry? Is it small or big? What kind of culture is fostered? Is it
conservative or innovative? What is important to the employees? What steps have been
taken to find out?
The best employee motivation efforts focus on what employees deem to be
important. It may be that employees within the same department of the same
24
organization will have different motivators. Many organizations today find that
flexibility in job design and reward has resulted in employees' increased longevity with
the company, increased productivity, and better morale. Although this "cafeteria-plan"
approach to the work-reward continuum presents variety, some strategies are prevalent
across all organizations that strive to improve employee motivation.
• EMPOWERMENT
Giving employees more responsibility and decision-making authority increases
their control overthe tasks for which they are held responsible and better equips them to
carry out those tasks. Trapped feelings arising from being held accountable for
something one does not have the resources to carry out are diminished. Energy is
diverted from self-preservation to improved task accomplishment. Empowerment
brings the job enlargement of the 1950s and the job enrichment that began in the 1960s
to a higher level by giving the employees some of the power to expand their own jobs
and create new, personally identified challenges.
25
• LEARNING
If employees are given the tools and the opportunities to accomplish more, most
will take on the challenge. Companies can motivate employees to achieve more by
committing to perpetual enhancement of employee skills. Accreditation and licensing
programs for employees are an increasingly popular and effective way to bring about
growth in employee knowledge and motivation. Often, these programs improve
employees' attitudes toward the client and the company, while bolstering self-
confidence. Supporting this assertion, an analysis of factors which influence motivation
to learn found that it is directly related to the extent to which training participants
believe that such participation will affect their job or career utility. In other words, if
the body of knowledge gained can be applied to the work to be accomplished, then the
acquisition of that knowledge will be a worthwhile event for the employee and
employer.
• QUALITY OF LIFE
The number of hours worked each week by American workers is on the rise again and
many families have two adults working those increased hours. Under these
circumstances, many workers are left wondering how to meet the demands of their lives
beyond the workplace. Often, this concern occurs while at work and may reduce an
employee's productivity and morale. Companies that have instituted flexible
employee arrangements have gained motivated employees whose productivity has
increased. Programs incorporating flextime, condensed workweeks, or job sharing, for
example, have been successful in focusing overwhelmed employees toward the work to
be done and away from the demands of their private lives.
• MONETARY INCENTIVE
For all the championing of alternative motivators, money still occupies a
rightful place in the mix of motivators. The sharing of a company's profits gives
incentive to employees to produce a quality product, perform a quality service, or
improve the quality of a process within the company. What benefits the company
directly benefits the employee. Monetary and other rewards are being given to
employees for generating cost savings or process-improving ideas, to boost productivity
and reduce absenteeism. Money is effective when it is directly tied to an employee's
ideas or accomplishments. Nevertheless, if not coupled with other, non monetary
26
motivators, its motivating effects are short-lived. Further, monetary incentives can
prove counterproductive if not made available to all members of the organization.
• OTHER INCENTIVES
Study after study has found that the most effective motivators of workers are
non monetary. Monetary systems are insufficient, in part because expectations often
exceed results and because disparity between salaried individuals may divide rather
than unite employees. Proven non monetary motivators foster team spirit and include
recognition, responsibility, and advancement. Managers, who recognize the "small
wins" of employees, promote participatory environments, and treat employees with
fairness and respect will find their employees to be more highly motivated. One
company's managers brainstormed to come up with 30 powerful rewards that cost
little or nothing to implement. The most effective rewards, such as letters of
commendation and time off from work, enhanced personal fulfillment and self-respect.
Over the longer term, sincere praise and personal gestures are far more effective and
more economical than awards of money alone. In the end, a program that combines
monetary reward systems and satisfies intrinsic, self-actualizing needs may be the most
potent employee motivator.
27
1.7. LIMITATION OF THE STUDY
❖ Some employees were having little difficulty in expressing the view even
though theanswer to the questions.
❖ Time period of the study is also very short.
❖ As the workers are not literate enough, it was difficult to get the responses
from them.
❖ Employees of the company are not aware of what is motivation and
enrichment means.
❖ Most of the employee didn’t come forward to give over opinion about the
management sodidn’t provide me to drive a concrete solution.
❖ The study was limited only one company PSJ metals
❖ The study based on only 179 samples.
❖ The study based on employs side. It is not covering the staff.
28
1.8. CHAPTER SCHEME
Organization of the Report
Chapter I
This chapter deals with the Introduction of the Study which covers Introduction,
statement of the problem, objectives of the study, scope of the study, Industry profile,
Company Profile, Limitations of the study.
Chapter II
This Chapter deals with the Review of Literature, Research Gap.
Chapter III
This chapter deals with a Research Methodology of the study. It shows sampling,
period cover by the study, sources of data, tools used for the study, Hypothesis of the
study.
Chapter IV
This chapter deals with the Data Analysis and Interpretation, Testing of hypothesis
of the study.
Chapter V
This chapter deals with the Summary of Findings, Suggestions & Conclusion of the
Study.
29
CHAPTER – II
2.1. REVIEW OF LITRATURE
Honold (1997), suggests that an empowered organization is one where
managers supervise more people than in a traditional hierarchy and delegate more
decisions to their subordinates (Malone, 1997). Managers act like coaches and help
employees solve problems. Employees, he concludes, have increased responsibility.
Superiors empowering subordinates by delegating responsibilities to them leads to
subordinates who are more satisfied with their leaders and consider them to be fair and
in turn to perform up to the superior’s expectations (Keller and Dansereau, In practice,
the definition of delegation appears to be of critical importance. It can be discerned by
the language used by the researcher. The words “subordinate” and “superior” in the
language suggests giving additional tasks to employees. This is not perceived as
empowering by employees (Menon 1995). Providing for the development of self-
worth by negotiating for latitude in decision making and changing aspects of the
employee’s job leads to increased levels of perceived self-control and hence
empowerment.
Johnson (2008), studied that absenteeism due to stress increased slightly in
South African companies in 2008 compared with the previous year. So far 3.4% of all
sick leaves taken until the end of June this year were due to stress, depression and
anxiety, according to Cams, a company which looks at corporate absenteeism. This was
line with indications that the country was experiencing an economic downturn. In
2007 this figure was 3.1% and 3.9% in 2006. The research was done with the help of
statistics from 100,000 employees in 60 companies, using data from doctor-issued sick
certificates. "Companies should therefore continue to ask themselves what they could
do to make their staff happy and productive."
Mills (1973), predicts that Industrial sociologists and psychologists have often
paid little more than scant attention to the actual work of the people they have been
studying. The literature is full of brief comments about the work situation which lack
both data and an analytical framework. This deficiency is surprising. Work content has
been shown to have a significant impact on behaviour, morale, and productivity in the
workplace. The purpose of job design research is to seek to understand this relationship
more clearly and then to use research-based insights to create jobs which are more
satisfying to perform, and more efficient in performance. As such this body of
30
knowledge should be a subject of particular relevance for personnel specialists since
job content considerations should affect recruitment, training, placement and effort-
reward policies. However, although job content has very wide repercussions for the
personnel area, job design is frequently left by default to the technical and engineering
specialists, who seek to make their work system function effectively in production
rather than human terms.
Mogelof et.al (2005), discusses context-driven job satisfaction tradeoffs
associated with careers in élite versus non-élite organizations and the role organizations
may play in facilitating or impeding workers’ participation in valued activities. It
emphasizes the importance of participation in valued activities as a key driver of job
satisfaction. The original purpose of this study was not to focus on job satisfaction, but
rather to conduct an exploratory investigation of how symphony orchestra players
cope with the frustrations and disappointments of orchestra life. Symphony orchestra
players report surprisingly low levels of job satisfaction given the perception held by
many that life and work in symphony orchestras is glamorous and rewarding.
Orpen (2007), examined that (1) Employees in the enriched condition perceived
their jobs as more enriched than before; (2) enrichment caused significant increases in
employee job satisfaction, job involvement, and internal motivation; (3) enrichment
led to significant decreases in absenteeism and turnover; but (4) enrichment had little
impact on performance, whether assessed by superiors' ratings or by actual output.
These findings, which are described in terms of the Hackman-Oldham theory of
job design, are regarded as suggestive evidence that enrichment can cause substantial
improvements in employee attitudes, but that these benefits may not lead to greater
productivity. It is argued that in order to explain the effect of enrichment on
performance, it is necessary to consider other factors besides the psychological states
produced by jobs which are seen to have certain characteristics.
Peter et.al (2004), said Job enrichment is a type of job redesign intended to
reverse the effects of tasks that are repetitive requiring little autonomy. Some of these
effects are boredom, lack of flexibility, and employee dissatisfaction (Leach & Wall,
2004). The underlying principle is to expand the scope of the job with a greater
variety of tasks, vertical in nature, that require self-sufficiency. Since the goal is to give
the individual exposure to tasks normally reserved for differently focused or higher
positions, merely adding more of the same responsibilities related to an employee's
31
current position is not considered job enrichment.
Pettman (1979), examines that “quality of working life” (QWL) has grown
steadily over a period in which the industrialised nations have increasingly come to
question the role and status of human beings in the modern technological environment.
In recent years concern with the nature of work, its impact upon people, and their
attitudes towards it, seem to have sharpened. Investigation of, and experimentation
with, the qualitative aspects of working life—its ability to confer self-fulfilment
directly, for example, as opposed to being a means of acquiring goods— has gained
momentum under the influence of a unique set of economic, social, political and
technological factors. The outpouring of books, reports and articles from a wide variety
of sources has, not surprisingly, grown apace.
Roberts (2006), study that absence is a major issue for many UK organizations,
yet less than half monitor the cost of absence to their business (CIPD, July 2007). On
average the cost of absence is £659 per employee per year and in addition to this the
indirect cost of absenteeism on the organization is significant, affecting productivity
levels and knowledge management and putting customer service, morale
and corporate reputations at risk. Managing absence is about starting
with the little things.
Ullah (1991), Considers that implementing Total quality management is more a
matter of changing people than changing technologies. Shows how psychology can
be used to facilitate the process. Examines attitudes and behaviour, values and
motivation. Discusses work redesign and goal setting as methods of motivating staff to
achieve desired standards of work behaviour. Finally, considers the importance of
psychological measurement to test customer attitudes. Concludes that there are other
areas of organisational psychology which have implications for implementing a
programme of Total quality, and that the human side of TQM is at least as important as
the technical side.
32
RESEARCH GAP:
From the view of literature reviews proposes the factorial evidence job
enrichment and employees motivation in various sectors in India. As per factories Act,
1948, those statutory provisions are given by every organisation for secure their
employees standard of living & betterment in higher productivity. By those reviews,
none of the study focuses the relationship between those factors which govern the
labour welfare measures & Quality of work life.
This study focuses there is any relationship between Labour welfare measures
& Quality of work life among employees in any organisation. To evaluate those
relationship by analyse & compare the factors of LWM & QWL such as Job
satisfaction with demographic profile & work environment, stress factors with
Industrial conflict, working conditions with Industrial disputes. The above relationships
are mentioned detail in the following as well as in this study.
As industrial Law says, there is a statutory law for every Industrial provision.
So every organisation or industries should follow those laws to make those provisions
under the Act.
33
CHAPTER - III
3.1. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
DEFINITION:
The process used to collect the information and data for the purpose of making
business decision .the methodology may include publication research ,interviews,
survey and other research techniques, and could include both present and historical
information.
RESEARCH DESIGN:
A detailed outline of how an investigation will take place. A research design
will typically include how data is to be collected, what instrument will be employed ,
how the instruments will used and the intended means for analyzing data collected.
A research design is detailed blue print used to guide a research study towards
its objective the process of designing a research study involves may interrelated
decision.
DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH:
The research design adopted for the study is “descriptive research “descriptive
method was adopted because it deals with description of the state of affairs as it exists
at present. It also known as statistical research, describes data and characteristics about
the population or phenomenon being studied.
RESEARCH CONCEPTUAL CLARIFICATION:
Research is defined as human activity based on intellectual application in the
investigation of matter. The primary purpose for applied research is discovering,
interpreting, and development of method and system for the advancement of human
knowledge on the wide variety of scientific matter of our world and universe. Research
can the scientific method, but need not do so.
TYPE OF RESEARCH
DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH
Descriptive research is used to describe characteristics of a population or
phenomenon being studied. It does not answer question about how/when/why the
characteristics occurred. Rather it addresses the “what” question (what are the
characteristics of Minnesota state population or situation being studied?) The
characteristics used to describe the situation or populations are usually some kind of
categorical scheme also known as descriptive categories. For example, the periodic
34
table categorizes the elements. Scientists use knowledge about the nature of electrons,
protons and neutrons to device this categorical scheme. We now take for granted the
periodic table, yet it took descriptive research to devise it.
SAMPLING MEANING:
Sampling is the part of statistical practice concerned with the selection of
individual observations intended to yield some knowledge about a population of
concern, especially for the purpose of statistical inference.
SAMPLE SIZE:
The sample size chosen for the study is 179 employees.
TYPES OF SAMPLING:
The sampling type is non probability which involves deliberating selections of
particular unit’s constitution a sample, which represents the universe.
STRATIFIED SAMPLING:
Stratum means layer population from which samples are to be selected may
certain a number of layers from each layer a few samples are selected that is why this
method is called stratified sampling.
35
3.3. PERIOD OF THE STUDY:
This study describes the employees industrial statutory provisions and Quality
of work life among them, the survey on employees could conduct on one month basis.
But this study duration is three month.
PRIMARY DATA:
The Primary data is defined as the data, which is collected for the first time and
fresh in nature, and happen to be original in character through field survey. Primary data
collection you collect data yourself using methods such as questionnaires. The key point
here is that the data you collect these unique to you and your research and, until you
publish, no one else has access do it.
There are many methods of collecting primary data and the main methods include
• Questionnaires
SECONDARY DATA:
The Secondary data are those which have already been collected by someone else
and have been passed through statistical process. The secondary data for this study are
already available in the firm’s internal records, annual report broaches, and company’s
website.
36
PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS:
Percentage refers to a special kind of ratio. Percentages are used in making
comparison between two or more series of data. Percentage is used to describe terms
the distribution is two or more series of data.
𝑵𝒐. 𝒐𝒇. 𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒑𝒐𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒔
𝑷𝒆𝒓𝒄𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒂𝒈𝒆 = × 𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝑻𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝑵𝒐. 𝒐𝒇. 𝑹𝒆𝒔𝒑𝒐𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒔
CHI – SQUARE ANALYSIS:
The chi-square test is an important test amongst the several tests of significance
developed by statisticians. Chi-square, symbolically written as 2 (Pronounced as Ki-
square), is a statistical measure used in the context of sampling analysis for comparing
a variance to a theoretical variance. As a non-parametric* test, it “can be used to
determine if categorical data shows dependency or the two classifications are
independent. It can also be used to make comparisons between theoretical populations
and actual data when categories are used”. Thus, the chi-square test is applicable in
large number of problems. The test is, in fact, a technique through the use of which it is
possible for all researchers to (i) test the goodness of fit; (ii) test the significance of
association between two attributes, and (iii) test the homogeneity or the significance of
population variance.
(𝑶𝒊−𝑬𝒊)^𝟐
2 = ∑
𝑬𝒊
Where,
2 = Chi-Square goodness of fit test
Oi = observed value
Ei = expected value
CORRELATION ANALYSIS:
Correlation is a bivariate analysis that measures the strength of association
between two variables and the direction of the relationship. In terms of the strength of
relationship, the value of the correlation coefficient varies between +1 and -1. A value
of ± 1 indicates a perfect degree of association between the two variables. As the
correlation coefficient value goes towards 0, the relationship between the two variables
will be weaker. The direction of the relationship is indicated by the sign of the
coefficient; a + sign indicates a positive relationship and a – sign indicates a negative
relationship. Usually, in statistics, we measure four types of correlations: Pearson
37
correlation, Kendall rank correlation, Spearman correlation, and the Point-Biserial
correlation.
38
CHAPTER – IV
4.1 DATA ANLAYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
TABLE 4.1.1: GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS
54%
52%
50%
48%
Percentage of respondents
46%
46%
44%
42%
40%
Male Female
Interpretation:
The above table shows that Gender of the employees. Out of 179 respondents
are 97 respondents are male that is 55% and 82 respondents are female employee that is
46%. The age of respondents shows clearly in the form of chart. It clearly shows that
majority 97 respondents are Male.
39
TABLE 4.1.2: RESPONDENTS BELONGS TO DEPARTMENTS
30%
25%
25%
21%
20% 18%
15% 13%
12% 12%
Percentage of respondents
10%
5%
0%
40
TABLE 4.1.3: AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS
35%
30% 29%
28%
25%
25%
20% 18%
percentage of respondents
15%
10%
5%
0%
20-30 31-40 41-50 above50
Interpretation:
The above table & chart shows that age of the employees. Out of 179
respondents, 49 are belonging in age group of 20 - 30 years that is 28%, 51
respondents are belongs the age group 31 - 40 years that is 29%, 46 respondents are
belongs the age group of 41 - 50 years that is 25% and 33 respondents are belongs age
group of above 50 years that is 18%. The respondent ages clearly show in the chat
given below. It clearly shows that majority respondents are belonging in the age group
of 31 - 40 years.
41
TABLE 4.1.4: MARITAL STATUS OF THE RESPONDENTS
Status No of respondents Percentage of respondents
married 90 50
Unmarried 77 43
Widow 12 7
Total 179 100
60%
50%
50%
43%
40%
30%
percentage of respondents
20%
10% 7%
0%
married Unmarried Widow
Interpretation:
The above table and chart shows that the marital status of the employees. Out of
179 respondent’s, 90 respondents are married that is50%, 77 respondents are unmarried
that is 43% and 12 respondents are widow. The marital status of respondent are clearly
shows that in the form of chart. It clearly shows that majority of the respondents are
married.
42
TABLE 4.1.5: EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION OF THE
RESPONDENTS
Qualification No of respondents Percentage of respondents
Illiterate 36 19
SSLC 26 15
Diploma 42 24
UG 37 21
Others 38 21
Total 179 100
30%
25% 24%
21% 21%
20% 19%
15%
15%
Percentage of respondents
10%
5%
0%
Illitrate sslc diploma Ug others
43
TABLE 4.1.6: EXPERIENCE OF THE RESPONDENTS
Years No of respondents Percentage of respondents
0-5 years 71 39
6-10years 57 32
10-15 years 25 14
16-20 years 14 8
More than 20 12 7
Total 179 100
45%
39%
40%
35% 32%
30%
25%
10% 8% 7%
5%
0%
0-5 years 6-10years 10-15 years 16-20 years More than
20
Interpretation:
The above table shows that the employee experience. Out of 179 respondents,
71 respondents have 0 – 5 years experience that is 39%, 57 respondents has 6 – 10
years experience that is 32% and 25 respondents have 10 – 15 years experience that is
14%, 14 respondents have 16 – 20 years of experience that is 8% and 12 respondents
have more than 20 years that is 7%. Experience of respondents is show clearly in the
form of charts given below the table. It clearly shows that majority of the respondents
have 0 – 5 years experience.
44
TABLE 4.1.7: MONTHLY SALARY OF THE RESPONDENTS
Salary No of respondents Percentage of respondents
Up to 10,000 75 41
10,000-20,000 53 30
20,000-30,000 25 14
30,000 – 40,000 14 8
Above 50,000 12 7
Total 179 100
45%
41%
40%
35%
30%
30%
25%
20%
14% Percentage of respondents
15%
10% 8% 7%
5%
0%
Interpretation:
The above table shows that monthly income of the employees. Out of 179
respondents income status, 75 respondents are earn up to10,000 that is 41%, 53
respondents earn 10,000-20,000 that is 30% and 25 respondent are earn 20,000 - 30,000
that is 14%, 14 respondents are earn 30,000 – 40,000 that is 8%. 7 respondents earn
above 50,000 that is 7%. Incomes of respondents are show clearly in the form of charts
given below. It clearly show that majority of the respondent are earn up to 10,000.
45
TABLE 4.1.8: TOP MANGEMENT INVOLVE IN EMPLOYEES
DECISION MAKING
Basis No of respondents Percentage of respondents
very frequently 45 25
frequently 39 22
occasionally 37 21
rarely 29 16
very rarely 29 16
Total 179 100
30%
25%
25%
22%
21%
20%
16% 16%
15%
5%
0%
Interpretation:
The above table shows that top management involvement in employees decision
making of the employees. Out of 179 respondents, 45 said very frequently involvement
that is 25%, 39 respondents said only frequently involvement that is 22%, 37
respondents said occasionally involved that is 21%, 29 said rare involvement that is
16% and rest of 29 said very rare involvement that is 16%. Top management
involvements were show clearly in the form of charts given below. It clearly show that
majority of the respondents were said very frequently involvement on employees
decision making.
46
TABLE 4.1.9: PREFERENCE ABOUT THIS JOB
Basis No of respondents Percentage of respondents
Interested on the job 37 21
Social status 40 22
Remuneration 29 16
Image of industry 45 25
Reputation 28 16
Total 179 100
30%
25%
25%
22%
21%
20%
16% 16%
15%
10%
Percentage of respondents
5%
0%
Interpretation:
The above table shows that preference about their job among the employees.
Out of 179 respondents, 37 said very frequently involvement that is 21%, 40
respondents said social status that is 22%, 29 respondents said remuneration that is
16%, 45 said image of industry that is 25% and rest of 28 said reputation that is 16%.
Preferences about their job among employees were show clearly in the form of charts
given below. It clearly show that majority of the respondents were said image of
industry was the preference on their job.
47
TABLE 4.1.10: RESPONDENTS FREEDOM TO PERFORM THEIR
TASK BY THEIR OWN APPROACH
Levels No of respondents Percentage of respondents
Agree 73 41
disagree 25 14
Neutral 34 19
Strongly agree 32 18
Strongly disagree 15 8
Total 179 100
45%
41%
40%
35%
30%
25%
19% 18%
20% Percentage of respondents
14%
15%
10% 8%
5%
0%
Agree disagree Neutral Strongly Strongly
agree disagree
Interpretation:
The above table shows that respondents freedom to perform their task by their
own approach. Out of 179 respondents, 73 were agreed that is 25%, 25 respondents
were disagree that is 14%, 34 respondents were in neutral that is 19%, 32 were
strongly agree that is 18% and rest of 15 were strongly disagree that is 8%.
Respondents freedom to perform their task by their own approach were show clearly in
the form of charts given below. It clearly show that majority of the respondents were
agreed upon freedom to perform their task by their own approach.
48
TABLE 4.1.11: RESPONDENTS OPPORTUNITY FOR
INDEPENDENT DECISIONS DURING EXECUTION OF THEIR
TASK
Levels No of respondents Percentage of respondents
Agree 36 20
Disagree 42 23
Neutral 37 21
Strongly agree 48 27
Strongly disagree 16 9
Total 179 100
30%
27%
25% 23%
21%
20%
20%
15%
Percentage of respondents
10% 9%
5%
0%
Agree Disagree Neutral Strongly Strongly
agree disagree
49
TABLE 4.1.12: RESPONDENTS CONTROL OVER QUALITY OF
THEIR WORK
Levels No of respondents Percentage of respondents
Agree 45 25
Disagree 39 22
Neutral 37 21
Strongly agree 29 16
Strongly disagree 29 16
Total 179 100
30%
25%
25%
22%
21%
20%
16% 16%
15%
Percentage of respondents
10%
5%
0%
Agree Disagree Neutral Strongly Strongly
agree disagree
Interpretation:
The above table shows that respondents control over quality of team work. Out
of 179 respondents, 45 were agreed that is 25%, 39 respondents were disagree that is
22%, 37 respondents were in neutral that is 21%, 29 were strongly agree that is 16%
and rest of 29 were strongly disagree that is 16%. Respondents controls over quality of
their work were shown clearly in the form of charts given below. It clearly show that
majority of the respondents were agreed upon controls over quality of their work.
50
TABLE 4.1.13: RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT JOB
ENRICHMENT EFFECTS ON SKILL IMPROVEMENT
Levels No of respondents Percentage of respondents
Agree 72 40
Disagree 17 9
Neutral 32 18
Strongly agree 38 21
Strongly disagree 20 12
Total 179 100
45%
40%
40%
35%
30%
25%
21%
20% 18% Percentage of respondents
15% 12%
9%
10%
5%
0%
Agree Disagree Neutral Strongly Strongly
agree disagree
Interpretation:
The above table shows that respondents opinion about job enrichment effects on
skill improvement. Out of 179 respondents, 72 were agreed that is 40%, 17 respondents
were disagree that is 9%, 32 respondents were in neutral that is 18%, 38 were strongly
agree that is 21% and rest of 20 were strongly disagree that is 12%. Respondents
opinion about job enrichment effects on skill improvement were shown clearly in the
form of charts given below. It clearly show that majority of the respondents were
agreed upon opinion about job enrichment effects on skill improvement.
51
TABLE 4.1.14: RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT TOP
MANGEMENT INTERESTED TO MOTIVATION
Levels No of respondents Percentage of respondents
Agree 52 29
Disagree 20 11
Neutral 38 22
Strongly agree 49 27
Strongly disagree 20 11
Total 179 100
35%
30% 29%
27%
25%
22%
20%
5%
0%
Agree Disagree Neutral Strongly Strongly
agree disagree
Interpretation:
The above table shows that respondents opinion about top management
interested to motivation. Out of 179 respondents, 52 were agreed that is 29%, 20
respondents were disagree that is 11%, 38 respondents were in neutral that is 22%, 49
were strongly agree that is 27% and rest of 20 were strongly disagree that is 11%.
Respondents opinion about top management interested to motivation were shown
clearly in the form of charts given below. It clearly show that majority of the
respondents were agreed upon opinion about top management interested to motivation.
52
TABLE 4.1.15: RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT JOB
ENRICHMENT INCREASE THE LEVEL OF SKILLS
FLEXIBILITY
Levels No of respondents Percentage of respondents
Agree 75 42
Disagree 15 8
Neutral 33 18
Strongly agree 35 20
Strongly disagree 21 12
Total 179 100
45% 42%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
20% 18% Percentage of respondents
15% 12%
10% 8%
5%
0%
Agree Disagree Neutral Strongly Strongly
agree disagree
53
TABLE 4.1.16: RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT MONETARY
REWARD THEY WANT
Rewards No of respondents Percentage of respondents
Salary increment 45 25
Wages 41 23
increment
Incentive 75 42
Commission 10 6
Paid leaves 8 4
Total 179 100
45% 42%
40%
35%
30%
25%
25% 23%
20%
Percentage of respondents
15%
10%
6%
4%
5%
0%
54
TABLE 4.1.17: RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT NON
MONETARY REWARD THEY WANT
Rewards No of Percentage of
respondents respondents
Recognition 52 29
Additional training 38 22
Flexible work 20 11
arrangement
Tangible rewards 41 23
Provide a day off 20 11
Total 179 100
35%
29%
30%
25% 22% 23%
20%
15%
11% 11%
10%
Percentage of respondents
5%
0%
Interpretation:
The above table shows that respondents opinion about non monetary reward
they want. Out of 179 respondents, 52 said recognition that is 29%, 38 respondents said
additional training that is 22%, 20 respondents said flexible working arrangement that
is 11%, 41 respondents said tangible rewards that is 23% and rest of 20 respondents
said provide a day off that is 11%. Respondents opinion about non monetary reward
they want were shown clearly in the form of charts given below. It clearly shown that
majority of the respondents opinion about non monetary reward, they want recognition.
55
TABLE 4.1.18: RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT INCENTIVE
PROVIDES TO MOTIVATE THEIR WORK
Incentives No of respondents Percentage of respondents
Cash 45 25
Gift 39 22
Profit sharing 37 21
Vocational time 29 16
bonus 29 16
Total 179 100
30%
25%
25%
22%
21%
20%
16% 16%
15%
Percentage of respondents
10%
5%
0%
Cash Gift Profit Vocational bonus
sharing time
Interpretation:
The above table shows that respondents opinion about incentive provides to
motivate their work. Out of 179 respondents, 45 said cash that is 25%, 39 respondents
said gift that is 22%, 37 respondents said profit sharing that is 21%, 29 respondents
said vocational time that is 16% and rest of 29 respondents said bonus that is 16%.
Respondents opinion about incentive provides to motivate their work were shown
clearly in the form of charts given below. It clearly shown that majority of the
respondents opinion about incentive provides to motivate their work was cash.
56
TABLE 4.1.19: RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT JOB ENRICHED
BY EXTRA WORK TIME
Opinion No of percentage Percentage of respondents
Yes 101 56
No 78 44
Total 179 100
60% 56%
50%
44%
40%
30%
Percentage of respondents
20%
10%
0%
Yes No
Interpretation:
The above table shows that respondents opinion about job enriched by extra
work time. Out of 179 respondents, 101 said yes that is 56% and 78 respondents said
no that is 44%. Respondents opinion about job enriched by extra work time were
shown clearly in the form of charts given below. It clearly shown that majority of the
respondents said yes, job enriched by extra work time.
57
TABLE 4.1.20: RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT TIME FOR
EXTRA WORK IN PER DAY
Hours No of respondents Percentage of respondents
1 hour 52 29
2 hour 20 11
3 hour 38 22
4 hour 49 27
Not at all 20 11
Total 179 100
35%
30% 29%
27%
25%
22%
20%
Percentage of respondents
15%
11% 11%
10%
5%
0%
1 hour 2 hour 3 hour 4 hour Not at all
Interpretation:
The above table shows that respondents opinion about time for extra work in a
day. Out of 179 respondents, 52 respondents said 1 hour that is 29%, 20 respondents
said 2 hours that is 11%, 38 respondents said 3 hours that is 22%, 49 respondents said
4 hours that is 27% and rest of 20 respondents said Not at all that is 11%. Respondents
opinion about time for extra work in a day were shown clearly in the form of charts
given below. It clearly shown that majority of the respondents said 1 hour for time of
extra work in a day.
58
TABLE 4.1.21: RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT OVERALL
HAPPINESS ON JOB
Levels No of respondents Percentage of respondents
Happy 45 25
More happy 39 22
Ecstatic 37 21
Un happy 29 16
More un happy 29 16
Total 179 100
30%
25%
25%
22%
21%
20%
16% 16%
15%
Percentage of respondents
10%
5%
0%
Happy More Ecstatic Un happy More un
happy happy
Interpretation:
The above table shows that respondents opinion about overall happiness on job.
Out of 179 respondents, 45 respondents were happy that is 25%, 39 respondents were
more happy that is 22%, 37 respondents were Ecstatic that is 21%, 29 respondents
were unhappy that is 16% and rest of 29 respondents were more unhappy that is 16%.
Respondents opinion about overall happiness on job were shown clearly in the form of
charts given below. It clearly shown that majority of the respondents were happy on
their job.
59
TABLE 4.1.22: RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT
MOTIVATIONAL FACTORS FOR PERSONAL GROWTH OF
EMPLOYEES
Factors No of Percentage of respondents
respondents
Salary increase 36 20
Promotion 42 23
Career development 37 21
Welfare measures 48 27
Job security 16 9
Total 179 100
30%
27%
25% 23%
21%
20%
20%
15%
10% 9%
Percentage of respondents
5%
0%
60
TABLE 4.1.23: RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT
RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES PROVIDED BY THE COMPANY
Activity No of respondents Percentage of respondents
Picnic 52 29
Tour 38 22
Family outing 20 11
Recreational program 41 23
None 20 11
Total 179 100
35%
29%
30%
20%
15%
11% 11%
10% Percentage of respondents
5%
0%
Interpretation:
The above table shows that respondents opinion about recreational activities
provided by the company. Out of 179 respondents, 52 respondents said picnic that is
29%, 38 respondents said tour that is 22%, 20 respondents said family outing that is
11%, 41 respondents said recreational program that is 23% and rest of 20 respondents
said None that is 11%. Respondents opinion about recreational activities provided by
the company were shown clearly in the form of charts given below. It clearly shown
that majority of the respondents need picnic towards recreational activities provided by
the company.
61
TABLE 4.1.24: RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT HYGIENE
FACTOR WOULD RESULTS JOB MOTIVATION
Factor No of respondents Percentage of respondents
Job security 36 20
Promotion 42 23
Pay and allowance 37 21
Working condition 48 27
Company policies 16 9
Total 179 100
30%
27%
25% 23%
21%
20%
20%
15%
Percentage of respondents
10% 9%
5%
0%
Job security Promotion Pay and Working Company
allowance condition policies
Interpretation:
The above table shows that respondents opinion about hygiene factor would
results job motivation. Out of 179 respondents, 36 respondents said job security that is
20%, 42 respondents said promotion that is 23%, 37 respondents said pay allowance
that is 21%, 48 respondents said working condition that is 27% and rest of 16
respondents said company policies that is 11%. Respondents opinion about hygiene
factor would results job motivation were shown clearly in the form of charts given
below. It clearly shown that majority of the respondents said working condition
hygiene factor would results job motivation.
62
4.2. TESTING OF HYPOTHESIS
4.2.1. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS
AND OPINION ABOUT JOB ENRICHMENT HAS A GOOD
EFECT ON SKILLS IMPROVEMENT OF EMPLOYEES:
In order to find the relationship between the age of the respondents and opinion
about overall welfare measures, the following null hypothesis was framed and tested
with the help of Chi-square test and the result is shown in the following table.
H0: There is no significant relationship between the age of the employees
and their opinion about job enrichment has a good effect on skills
improvement of employees.
H1: There is a significant relationship between the age of the employees and
their opinion about job enrichment has a good effect on skills
improvement of employees.
Assuming that H0 is true: At 5% level of Significance
S. Age Job enrichment has a good effect on skills Total
NO. improvement of employees
SA A N DA SDA
1. 20 – 30 20 9 4 7 9 49
(19.7) (4.7) (8.8) (10.4) (5.5)
2. 31 – 40 22 3 8 10 8 51
(20.5) (4.8) (9.1) (10.8) (5.7)
3. 41 – 50 11 3 10 20 2 46
(18.5) (4.4) (8.2) (9.8) (5.1)
4. Above 45 19 2 10 1 1 33
Years (13.3) (3.1) (5.9) (7) (3.7)
TOTAL 72 17 32 38 20 179
FORMULA:
(𝑶𝒊−𝑬𝒊)^𝟐
2 = ∑
𝑬𝒊
Oi Ei Oi - Ei Oi - Ei^2 Oi - Ei^2 / Ei
20 19.7 0.3 0.09 0.004568528
9 4.7 4.3 18.49 3.934042553
4 8.8 -4.8 23.04 2.618181818
7 10.4 -3.4 11.56 1.111538462
9 5.5 3.5 12.25 2.227272727
63
22 20.5 1.5 2.25 0.109756098
3 4.8 -1.8 3.24 0.675
8 9.1 -1.1 1.21 0.132967033
10 10.8 -0.8 0.64 0.059259259
8 5.7 2.3 5.29 0.928070175
11 18.5 -7.5 56.25 3.040540541
3 4.4 -1.4 1.96 0.445454545
10 8.2 1.8 3.24 0.395121951
20 9.8 10.2 104.04 10.61632653
2 5.1 -3.1 9.61 1.884313725
19 13.3 5.7 32.49 2.442857143
2 3.1 -1.1 1.21 0.390322581
10 5.9 4.1 16.81 2.849152542
1 7 -6 36 5.142857143
1 3.7 -2.7 7.29 1.97027027
n = 20 40.97787363
o From the above table value at 5 % level of significance
Degree of Freedom = (Column – 1) (Row – 1)
= (5-1) (4-1) = (4 X 3) = 12
The table value of 12 d.f = 21.026
o Since the 2 calculated value is more than the 2 table value, so we
reject the null hypothesis.
The following table summarises the output of chi-square analysis:
Factors Level of Degrees of Chi-square Chi- Decision
Significance freedom Calculated square Ho (or) H1
value table value
Age & Reject the
opinion 5% 12 d.f 40.978 21.026
(0.05) hypothesis
about job
enrichment
INFERENCE:
There is a significant relationship between the age of the employees and their
opinion about job enrichment has a good effect on skills improvement of employees.
64
4.2.2. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PREFERENCE FOR THE JOB
AND THE OVERALL HAPPINESS ABOUT THE JOB:
In order to find the relationship between the age of the respondents and opinion
about overall welfare measures, the following null hypothesis was framed and tested
with the help of Correlation analysis and the result is shown in the following table.
H0: There is no significant relationship between the preference for the job
and the overall happiness about the job.
H1: There is a significant relationship between the preference for the job and
the overall happiness about the job.
Assuming that H0 is true: At 5% level of Significance
65
Correlations
Preference for the job Happiness on the Job
Preference for the Pearson
1 .962**
job Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 179 179
Happiness on the Pearson
.962** 1
Job Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 179 179
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
: Computer data
From the above table represents the correlation between the preference for job
and Happiness in job. I used Pearson’s correlation method to evaluate whether there is
a relationship between these two variables or not.
By correlation analysis, the significant value for both are 0.000 which is less
than 0.05, which means the null hypothesis is rejected.
INFERENCE:
There is a significant relationship between the preference for the job and the
overall happiness about the job.
66
4.2.3.RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MONTHLY SALARY AND THE
OVERALL HAPPINESS ABOUT THE JOB.
In order to find the relationship between the age of the respondents and opinion
about overall welfare measures, the following null hypothesis was framed and tested
with the help of Correlation analysis and the result is shown in the following table.
H0: There is no significant relationship between the monthly salary and the
overall happiness about the job.
H1: There is a significant relationship between the monthly salary and the
overall happiness about the job.
Assuming that H0 is true: At 5% level of Significance
67
Correlations
Monthly Salary of the
respondents Happiness on the Job
Monthly Salary of the Pearson
1 .915**
respondents Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 179 179
Happiness on the Job Pearson
.915** 1
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 179 179
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Source: Computer data
From the above table represents the correlation between the monthly salary of
the respondents and Happiness on job. I used Pearson’s correlation method to evaluate
whether there is a relationship between these two variables or not.
By correlation analysis, the significant value for both are 0.000 which is less
than 0.05, which means the null hypothesis is rejected.
INFERENCE:
There is a significant relationship between the monthly salary and the overall
happiness about the job.
68
CHAPTER - V
5.1. FINDINGS
✓ Most of the (55%) of the respondents considered in the study are male
members.
✓ Majority (41%) of the respondents earn only up to 10,000 from the company.
✓ 25% of the respondents prefer the job for the image of industry.
✓ 27% of the respondents were strongly agreed upon that the opportunity for
independent decision during executing their task.
✓ 25% of the respondents were agreed for control over the quality on work.
✓ 40% of the respondents were agreed upon job enrichment has good effect of
skills improving the employee.
✓ 56% of respondents said yes, for extra work time job would be enriched.
✓ 29% of respondents said only one hour time of extra work in a day.
69
✓ 25% of respondents were happy for working in PSJ metals.
✓ 27% of respondents said welfare measures were the motivational factor for
personal growth of employees.
✓ There is a significant relationship between the age of the employees and their
opinion about job enrichment has a good effect on skills improvement of
employees.
✓ There is a significant relationship between the preference for the job and the
overall happiness about the job.
✓ There is a significant relationship between the monthly salary and the overall
happiness about the job.
70
5.2. SUGGESTION
✓ Greater awareness about the objectives of the job enrichment and employee motivation
must be created among the trainees at the time of their nomination for the training so
that it helps the trainee easily understand and attain the objectives and goals of the
program.
✓ Appropriate job enrichment will help to increase the freedom to adopt my own
approach when performing the task.
✓ The autonomy of employers for the opportunity for independents decision during
executing my task development as well as the development of the organization.
✓ The top management is interested to motivating the employers
✓ More importance should be given motivating all works
✓ Employee should develop positive attitude to enrich the job.
✓ Employees need to consult their superiors before attending the training program to
clarify their doubts.
✓ The employee’s feedback must be getting in proper way.
71
5.3. CONCLUSION
From the above study we can deduce that the job enrichment helps in increasing
motivation and reducing turnover but does not help much to reduce absenteeism. All
these effects combined together help in increasing job satisfaction of an employee
Employers often use in their speeches the cliché that “Employees are our most
important asset” without doing much to improve working conditions and the motivation
of employees to do their best for the organization. In today’s fast changing environment
employees are faced with increasing demands from various sources. Also with the
rising level of education employees aren’t any more satisfied with repetitive, not
meaningful, tasks. Job enrichment offers a good way to increase the variety of work and
to motivate employees to truly commit themselves for the benefit of the whole
organization. In increasingly competitive environment, management finds that the best
way to achieve corporate goals is to work together with the persons who are closest to
the actual work. Companies that implement programs that enhance employees’
knowledge, abilities, and experience and allow them to apply these new skills in their
work will be profitable in the future.
72
ANNEXURE
QUESTIONNAIRE
Dear Sir / Madam,
Myself Aasha Sabitha.K.M.S, student of MBA, Department of Management
studies, Vijay Institute of Management, Dindigul. I conduct a survey on “A STUDY
ON IMPACT OF JOB ENRICHMENT AND EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION IN
PSJ METALS ,DINDIGUL” and has designed this questionnaire to collect data from
the employees of the concern. The data collected will be used and reported in aggregate
form; no individual responses will be referred to or quoted. The information you
furnish will be treated as confidential. You are requested to take 5 minutes out of your
busy schedule to fill this survey. Your cooperation is highly appreciated and thank full.
Name :
1. Gender: (a) Male (b) Female
2. Department: (a) Finance (b) HR (c) Production (d) Material
(e) Logistics (f) Marketing
3. Age: (a) 20 – 30 (b) 31 – 40 (c) 41 -50 (d) Above 50
4. Marital status: (a) Married (b) Unmarried (c) Widow
5. Education qualification:
(a) Illiterate (b) SSLC (c) Diploma (d ) UG (e) Others
6. Experience:
(a) 0-5 Years (b) 6-10 Years (c) 10-15 Years (d) 16-20 Years
(e) More than20 Years
7. Monthly Salary
(a) Up To 10,000 (b) 10,000-20,000 (c) 20,000-30,000
(d)30,000 - 40000 (e)Above 40000
8.Does the top management involve you in decision making which are connected to
yourdepartment?
(a) Very Frequently (b) Frequently (c) Occasionally (d) Rarely
(e) Very Rarely
9.What made you to prefer this job?
(a) Interest On the job (b) Social Status (c) Remuneration
(d) Image Of Industry (e)Reputation
73
Autonomy of Employers
74
Motivation Capabilities
19. Will you work for extra time if your job will be enriched?
(a) Yes (b) No
20. If yes how many hours you like to work in extra hours per day?
(a) 1 hour (b)2 hour (c) 3 hour (d) 4 hour e)not at all
Personal Growth
22. Which of the following factor which motivates to the personal growth of
employees?
(a) Salary increase (b) Promotion (c) Career development
(d) Welfare measures (e) Job security
75
REFERENCES
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS
➢ Jain.T.R, Statistics for MBA, 2nd Edition
➢ Ashwatthapa, Human Resource Management, 7th Edition
WEBLIOGRAPHY
➢ www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/viewContentItem
➢ www.articlesbase.com/management-articles/job-enrichment
➢ www.eurofound.europa.eu/emire/IRELAND/JOBENRICHMENT
➢ www.smartmanager.us/eprise/main/web/us/
➢ www.collegeresearch.us/show_essay/11689.html
➢ www.bookpump.com/dps/pdf-b/1120699b.pdf
➢ www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/eb003472
➢ http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/eb055
➢ www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/1463444971019547
➢ http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/EUM0000000003126
➢ www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/01437720510587307
➢ http://www.joe.org/joe/1997october/iw1.html.
➢ http://edweb.sdsu.edu/people/arossett/pie/Interventions/jobdesign_1.htm
➢ www.bls.gov/osmr/abstract/ec/ec060010.htm.
76