Professional Documents
Culture Documents
&
Punjab Judicial Officers Academy
DAWN Editorials: 07 March 2024, Thursday
On oath,
The question arises: if the country`s top regulator is 10. Sworn in (v) فلحاُاھٹای
Avowed
claiming that it is not doing the blocking, who, then,
is preventing access to X? The recently departed Nonchalance Indifference,
11. ےبرپواہ
caretaker government had acted as if the matter was (N) Detachment
no big deal: none of the relevant ministers had Deliberately
12. اجنوُبھجرک Knowingly,
deigned to comment on or explain why anyone (Adv.) Perceptively
within Pakistan`s territorial boundaries could not
Circumstances,
access one of the most popular social media
13. Status quo (N) وصرتاحل Existing
platforms in the world without a VPN, even though conditions
they were posting on the platform periodically
Arbitrarily Randomly,
during their last days in office. The silence from 14. ےباُوصیلس
(Adv.) Illogically
official quarters has continued even though new
assemblies have been sworn in, which suggests that
the authorities aren`t very concerned that a major
internet service remains suspended, apparently
without the knowledge of the country`s top
regulator. Given the state`s nonchalance, one would
naturally assume that the authorities are either
afraid to speak openly on the matter or are
deliberately misleading the courts while hoping that
the citizenry will quietly accept this new `status quo`
over time. Neither is an acceptable scenario. X is a
valuable source of information for millions around
the world, and access to it cannot be denied
arbitrarily. The state must, at the very least, explain
itself.
Flagrant,
19. Egregious (Adj) تبیہانک Outrageous
Repeat,
20. Recur (v) دوابرہوہان
Reappear