Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hierarchy of courts:
HC-any punishment
Sessions and additional sessions judge-any punishment, death permission by HC.
CJM-any punishment not above 7 years
JMFC-not more than 3 years, not above 50,000, community service
JMSC-not more than 1 year, not above 10,000, community service
Section 4
Section 6 of BNSS-Following classes of courts shall be there-
1)Courts of session
2)JMFC(Judicial magistrate first class)
3)JMSC(Second class)
4)Executive magistrate
Section 9-Courts of JM
• The state government in consultation with HC, shall built one or more courts of JMFC and JMSC.
Proviso-The State gov. with HC may allocate special courts for certain matters with JMFC and
JMSC, and then no other court except for these will have the jurisdiction to deal with those matters.
• The presiding officers to be appointed by HC.
• If necessary or expedient, the HC may declare JMFC or JMSC to be a civil judge.
Under section 11 of CRPC.
Page 1 of 8
• Any offences under Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita can be tried by HC, sessions court, or any court
under first schedule.
Proviso-sexual offences by women judge only.
• Any offences mentioned under any other law, shall be tried by court mentioned under it and if not
mentioned, then by HC or by court under first schedule.
Under section 26 of CRPC.
Under CRPC-Section 46
1)Arest by police:
Page 2 of 8
B)Against whom an reasonable complaint has been made or credible information has been
received, or a reasonable suspicion exists, that he has committed a cognizable offence punishable
with less than 7 years or 7 years and fine, if following conditions are satisfied-
1. The police has reason to believe that such person has committed the offence.
2. Arrest is necessary(Arnesh Kumar checklist)-
• To prevent further offence.
• Proper investigation.
• Prevent tampering of evidence
• To prevent inducement from the offender to persons who know the facts of the case, as for
him to not disclose facts.
• As unless the person is arrested, he cannot be brought to the court.
The police shall write reasons for the same.
If not making arrest under this sub-section, still reasons are to be given.
C)When on credible information, the police has reason to believe the person has committed an
offence with imprisonment more than 7 years or with death sentence.
D)Someone who been proclaimed as an offender by state government or this act.
E)In whose possession a stolen property is found, and it may be reasonably suspected of having
committed a offence with reference to such thing.
F)Who obstructs a police officer in duty, or runs from custody.
G)Deserter from armed forces.
H)Someone who has been reasonably suspected to have committed an offence outside India, for
which he is also punishable in India.
I)Released convict for breach of rule.
J)For arrest, requisition has been received.
Proviso-Requisition to specify person and offence.
(2)No person in an non-cognizable offence shall be arrested except for order of magistrate.
(3)In all cases, where arrest no made under sub-section 1, the police shall send a notice directing
appearance of the person.
(5)If person complies with notice, he need not be arrested unless police feels otherwise.
(6)Where such person fails to comply with the notice, he may be arrested with order of competent
court.
(7)No arrest to be made unless by prior permission of officer rank not below DSP, in case of
imprisonment less than 3 years and such person is infirm or is above sixty years of age.
Under CRPC, this is section 41. Under CRPC, sub-sections 3,4,5,6,7 are not there.
Page 3 of 8
In an SLP to supreme court, directed the police to adhere to Section 41 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973, which provides a checklist to determine the necessity of an arrest. Additionally,
the court stated that a magistrate must assess whether a detained accused person should be kept in
further custody. This decision aimed to strike a balance between preventing misuse of the law and
protecting the rights of those accused.
The court issued directions to prevent unnecessary arrests by police officers and unwarranted
detention authorised by magistrates called as Arnesh Kumar Guildines and asked them to fulfil the
checklist under CRPC 41(1)(b)(ii).
This is now section 35(1)(b)(ii) under BNSS.
Nilabati Behera v. State of Orissa(1993)-One day, the petitioner’s son was arrested and next day,
he was found dead on the railway track, which was close to the police station. An unnatural death
case was registered, and in the post-mortem report several injuries by hard and blunt substances
were found.
She was aggrieved and filed a WP in the SC. She argued that the cause of death was custodial
violence. The state argued that death was because he escaped from lawful custody and was hit by
the train.The court held that Suman Behera’s death in police custody constituted a violation of his
right to life and personal liberty as guaranteed by Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. This
violation was established based on the evidence presented, including the post-mortem report
showing injuries on Suman Behera’s body and compensation was given to the mother.
DK Basu v. State of WB(1997)-DK Basu wrote a letter to the Supreme Court of India, bringing to
its attention news reports about deaths in police custody and lockups. In the letter, he highlighted
that such cases of custodial violence in WB and how they went unpunished, despite efforts made to
address the issue. The court took up this issue and asked all high courts to report on this. Looking at
the reports of all High courts, and the precedent of Nilabati Behera, reiterated that prisoners and
detainees should not be deprived of their Fundamental Rights under article 21. These guidelines
were incorporated in CRPC in 2008.
Guidlines-
1)Police while arresting should have proper name plates and uniform.(section 36,41B)
2)Arrest Memo to be maintained.(36,41B)
3)Case diary(Medical examination, arrest memo, FIR, Magistrate, Case number)
4)Nominated person-S 48/50A
5)Nominee Out of district-inform telephonically within 6-12 hours
6)Medical examination-when arrested and after 48 hours.
7)Police control room-Section 37/41C
8)Right to legal aid-Section 38/41D
9)Entire report to be submitted to magistrate
3)Arrest by Magistrate:
Section 48-Obligation of person making arrest to inform about arrest, etc., to relative or
friend-
• Police officer to inform a nominated person about arrest.
• Officer to make person aware of right under sub section 1.
• Entry of the fact as to who has been informed to be kept in a book.
• Magistrate to ensure sub-section 2 n 3 has been complied.
CRPC-50A
Section 55-Procedure when police officer deputes subordinate to arrest without warrant-
• When any officer in charge of a police station or any police officer making an investigation
requires any officer subordinate to him to arrest without a warrant (otherwise than in his
presence) any person who may lawfully be arrested without a warrant, he shall deliver to the
officer required to make the arrest an order in writing, specifying the person to be arrested and the
offence or other cause for which the arrest is to be made and the officer so required shall, before
making the arrest, notify to the person to be arrested the substance of the order and, if so required
by such person, shall show him the order.
• It shall not effect the power of arrest under section 35.
CRPC-55
Section 57-Person arrested to be taken before Magistrate or officer in charge of police station-
A police officer making an arrest without warrant shall, without unnecessary delay , send the person
arrested before a Magistrate having jurisdiction in the case, or before the officer in charge of a
police station.
CRPC-56
4) No Magistrate shall authorise detention of the accused in custody of the police under this section
unless the accused is produced before him in person for the first time and subsequently every time
till the accused remains in the custody. This can be done in person or through audio-visual means.
Explanation-If any question arises whether an accused person was produced before the Magistrate
as required under sub-section (4), the production of the accused person may be proved by his
signature on the order authorising detention or by the order 20 certified by the Magistrate as to
production of the accused person through the audio-video electronic means.
Proviso-woman under eighteen years of age, the detention shall be authorised to be in the custody
of a remand home or recognised social institution
Proviso-detained only in police station or judicial custody or place declared as prison by gov.
CRPC-167
Page 8 of 8