Professional Documents
Culture Documents
229781,
2017-10-10
Facts:
the four cases were consolidated and the DOJ Panel of Prosecutors (DOJ
Panel),[5] headed by Senior Assistant State Prosecutor Peter Ong, was
directed to conduct the requisite preliminary investigation
Issues:
Whether or not petitioner, in filing the present petition, violated the rule
against forum shopping
Ruling:
In this case, when petitioner De Lima failed to sign the Verification and
Certification against Forum Shopping in the presence of the notary, she
has likewise failed to properly swear under oath the contents thereof,
thereby rendering false and null the jurat and invalidating the Verification
and Certification against Forum Shopping... he Court explained that "non-
compliance therewith or a defect therein, unlike in verification, is
generally not curable by its subsequent submission or correction thereof,
unless there is a need to relax the Rule on the ground of 'substantial
compliance' or presence of 'special circumstances or compelling
reasons.'" Here, the CA did not mention nor does there exist - any
perceivable special circumstance or compelling reason which justifies
the rules' relaxation. At all events, it is uncertain if any of the private
respondents certified under oath that no similar action has been filed or
is pending in another forum.
Principles: