The Key Developments in Shadow Banking over the Last Two Decades

and Analysing Its Impacts on the Economic and Financial Results

INTRODUCTION:
In recent years, the financial lexicon has witnessed the ascent of a term that has garnered
considerable attention and analysis within the intricate tapestry of global finance—namely,
"shadow banking." This idea refers to an advanced credit intermediation system that operates
outside the conventional boundaries of traditional banking. In the last twenty years, the
evolution of shadow banking has been marked by significant growth, solidifying its position as
a vital and dynamic element within the broader global financial framework.

The exponential growth of shadow banking, while indicative of its adaptability and resilience,
has concurrently prompted a discerning examination of its nuanced implications. This surge
in its prominence has engendered a pivotal role within the intricate web of financial
transactions, contributing to the complexity of the global financial landscape. However, the
precipitous nature of its evolution has not been without attendant concerns, as stakeholders
and financial analysts alike have articulated apprehensions regarding the potential risks and
far-reaching impacts on the macroeconomic framework.

This essay delves into examining the significant advancements in non-bank financial activities
over the past two decades, investigating both beneficial and detrimental facets, and
understanding its complex interaction with the worldwide economic landscape. By dissecting
its multifaceted dimensions, it aims to provide a nuanced understanding of shadow banking's
impact on economic and financial dynamics, contributing to informed discourse on this
complex facet of contemporary finance.

DISCUSSION:
(i)SHADOW BANKING: AN IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS
The phenomenon of shadow banking represents a dynamic facet of the contemporary
financial landscape, characterised by financial transactions orchestrated by non-bank
financial intermediaries. These entities, including investment banks, alternative investment
funds, and money market funds, mirror the functions of traditional commercial banks.
However, they operate beyond the confines of the conventional regulatory framework,
thereby engendering a financial ecosystem that demands meticulous scrutiny and
comprehension. The term "shadow banking," though widely employed, has been criticised
for its pejorative connotations. As an alternative nomenclature, the term "market-based
financing and pricing" has been proposed, underscoring the evolving nature of financial
intermediation (Kodres, 2013).

Defining Shadow Banking

As defined, the shadow financial sector includes financial intermediaries involved in altering
financial maturity, managing debt, and addressing insolvency without depending on support
from central banks or government debt securities (Adrian & Ashcraft, 2012. Essentially, the
shadow banking realm covers all entities that perform activities akin to banking but operates
without conforming to the regulatory frameworks applied to conventional banks and lacks
access to public safety nets. Moreover, it comprises a wide range of financial entities and
activities that have the common feature of facilitating borrowing and lending operations
similar to those carried out by conventional banks. These activities, however, transpire in an
environment where the regulatory oversight is notably less stringent. The non-bank financial
intermediaries participating in shadow banking often undertake roles traditionally associated
with banks, such as credit intermediation and maturity transformation. Importantly, shadow
banking extends its reach to sectors beyond traditional banking, including investment
management and securities trading.

Components of Shadow Banking

The key elements of shadow banking are multifaceted, reflecting the diverse array of financial
intermediaries involved. Investment banks, as prominent entities within the realm of shadow
banking, engage in activities such as underwriting and trading securities, often with a greater
degree of leverage than traditional banks. Hedge funds, on the other hand, operate as
investment funds that employ a variety of strategies, including leverage and derivatives
trading, to generate returns for their investors. Money market funds, constituting another
essential element, operate as mutual funds specialising in short-term, investment-grade
securities.

(ii)EVOLUTION of SHADOW BANKING: PRE and POST 2007-2008 FINANCIAL CRISIS:

The progression of shadow banking underwent a transformative phase, both preceding and
following the 2007-2008 financial crisis. Before the onset of this crisis, the shadow banking
system experienced significant growth, playing a crucial role in the increase of housing credit.
Entities within the shadow banking sector, characterised as financial intermediaries operating
outside standard banking regulations, were involved in activities like maturity transformation,
liquidity transformation, credit risk transfer, and financial leverage. Notably, these entities,
including prominent brokerages and investment firms, could finance real estate lending and
other endeavours without adhering to the regulatory oversight and capital reserve and
liquidity rules applicable to traditional banks (Bromberg, 2023).

The crisis originated with subprime mortgages, originating from shadow banks and
subsequently bundled into mortgage-backed securities (Gelzinis, 2019). While the shadow
banking system significantly lowered borrowing costs leading up to the financial crisis, it
concurrently heightened susceptibility to panics and analogous risks, mirroring the
vulnerabilities of traditional banks (Pozsar et al., 2013). The crisis ensued with a run on the
shadow banking system, resulting in prolonged financial market disruption and the demise of
major banks such as Washington Mutual and IndyMac.

Post-crisis, there emerged a heightened awareness of the imperative to fortify the regulation
and oversight of shadow banks. Policymakers directed efforts towards formulating a
regulatory reform agenda for the shadow banking system, bolstering oversight of regulated
institutions, and thereby creating potential arbitrage opportunities within the shadow
banking system (Tarullo, 2012). Despite intensified regulatory scrutiny, the non-bank financial
industry continued its substantial growth in the decade following the crisis, assuming a crucial
role in addressing credit demands unmet by traditional banks. This expansion raised
apprehensions about potential risks to the global financial system (Bromberg, 2023). The
NBFC system experienced substantial changes following the 2007-2008 financial crisis. The
influence of fintech on mortgage lending led to a nearly twofold increase in shadow banks'
market share from 2007 to 2015. Traditional banks, facing capital constraints and regulatory
pressures, withdrew, allowing fintechs to contribute to approximately one-third of shadow
banking loans by 2015 (Buchak et al., 2017).

The non-bank financial field, operating outside traditional regulations, played a significant
role in the pre-crisis housing credit expansion. Since then, it has grown and largely evaded
government oversight (Bromberg, 2023). Despite this, there's been a reduction in crisis-
amplifying shadow banking activities, shifting towards more resilient market-based finance
(Adrian, 2017). Authorities have been actively seeking hidden vulnerabilities in the sector
since the crisis (Kodres, 2019).

Conceptually, shadow banking addresses unmet financial needs, with a post-crisis trend
favouring more resilient forms of market-based finance (Adrian, 2017). Regulatory changes
and ongoing debates are focused on understanding the factors driving shadow banking's
rapid growth and assessing the social utility of its components (Gelzinis, 2019).

Essentially, the shadow banking system adapted to the impact of financial technology on
mortgage lending after 2008, which led to regulatory adjustments and a shift to flexible
market-based financing. The crisis exposed vulnerabilities that drew even more attention to
the need for more effective regulation and supervision, even as shadow banks expanded.
Changes in shadow banking both before and after the crisis are closely related to the financial
mandate of the Financial Stability Board. The FSB has been instrumental in identifying and
addressing shadow banking vulnerabilities and risks, particularly since the 2010 financial
crisis, and has taken proactive measures that are critical to maintaining global financial
stability and reducing systemic risks.
(iii)IMPACT OF SHADOW BANKING ON ECONOMIC GROWTH:
Preceding the financial crisis that unfolded in 2007-2008, the proliferation of shadow banking,
linked to factors such as GDP growth, depressed wages, and a concentrated distribution of
wealth, prompted a pursuit of outcomes and opportunities for the expansion of credit
intermediation (Gelos and Valckx, 2014). Advocates of shadow banking underscore its
advantages, including providing borrowers with a diverse array of options and extending
financial services to individuals marginalised by the conventional financial system
(Katsomitros and Author, 2023). It is posited that shadow banking diminishes dependence on
traditional banks as a credit source and has the potential to enhance economic efficiency
(Bromberg, 2023). Moreover, the crisis underscored that the vulnerabilities and issues
affecting the shadow banking system are akin to those of traditional banks (Bromberg, 2023).

Post-crisis, the shadow banking sector has continued to expand, raising apprehensions
regarding potential risks to the global financial system (Katomitoros and Author, 2023). An
unregulated sector, marked by escalating liquidity, complicates the identification of the
nature and extent of systemic risks, while elevated leverage may result in unmanageable
profits. Developments in shadow finance are correlated with volatile business cycles and
diminishing trends in total factor productivity (TFP), a phenomenon associated with growth
and underdevelopment (Magkonis et al., 2022).

(Table taken from: Magnokis et. Al., 2022)

Ultimately, the impact of shadow finance on economic growth is intricate. While it has
contributed to GDP growth and the enlargement of credit, it has concurrently engendered
heightened complexity, risk, and uncertainty in the business cycle.
CONCLUSION:
The development of non-bank financial activities, in the last two decades, has significantly
impacted the financial system and the economy. While it has driven economic growth by
providing alternative credit, the lack of robust regulatory oversight poses a threat to financial
stability. This dual role, as both an economic facilitator and a source of systemic risk,
challenges regulators in finding equilibrium. Regulators must balance the need for financial
innovation with ensuring the financial system’s integrity, swiftly adapting to emerging trends.
Failure to do so could leat to global financial crises, emphasising the urgency for proactive
regulatory measures.

Addressing these challenges requires a comprehensive and adaptable legal framework that
reacts to current developments and anticipates future shifts. Strengthening regulatory
mechanisms is crucial to fortify the global financial architecture, fostering innovation while
preventing systemic vulnerabilities. In essence, navigating the complex relationship between
shadow banking and regulatory oversight demands a nuanced approach that harmonises
innovation with stability. Only through a forward-looking strategy can we effectively address
the evolving challenges and strengthen the integrity of the global financial architecture.

REFERENCES:
1) Adrian, T., & Ashcraft, A. (2012, October). Shadow banking: a review of the
literature. FRB of New York Staff Report (Accessed: 20 November 2023)
2) Adrian, T. (2017) Shadow Banking and Market Based Finance, IMF. Available at:
https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2017/09/13/sp091417-shadow-banking-
and-market-based-finance (Accessed: 22 November 2023).
3) Ağırman E, Serçemeli M, Özcan M (2013) Shadow banking: an overview. In: 9th
Iberian international business conference, Braga-Portugal.
4) Bromberg, M. (2023) Shadow banking system: Definition, examples, and how it
works, Investopedia. Available at: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/shadow-
banking-system.asp (Accessed: 21 November 2023).
5) Buchak , G. et al. (2017) Center for Financial Research – Bank Research Conference,
FDIC. Available at: https://www.fdic.gov/analysis/cfr/bank-research-conference/
(Accessed: 22 November 2023).
6) Gelos, G. and Valckx, N. (2014) The growth of Shadow Banking, IMF. Available at:
https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2014/10/03/the-growth-of-shadow-banking
(Accessed: 21 November 2023).
7) Gelzinis, G. (2019) Strengthening the regulation and oversight of Shadow Banks,
Center for American Progress. Available at:
https://www.americanprogress.org/article/strengthening-regulation-oversight-
shadow-banks/ (Accessed: 21 November 2023).
8) Katsomitros, A. and Writer, F. (2023) The dangerous growth of shadow banking,
World Finance. Available at: https://www.worldfinance.com/special-reports/the-
dangerous-spread-of-shadow-banking (Accessed: 21 November 2023).
9) Kodres , L.E. (2013) What Is Shadow Banking?, What is shadow banking? - back to
Basics - Finance & Development, June 2013. Available at:
 https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2013/06/basics.htm (Accessed: 18
November 2023).
10) Kodres, L. (2019) Shadow banks: Out of the eyes of Regulators, IMF. Available at:
https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/Series/Back-to-Basics/Shadow-
Banks (Accessed: 22 November 2023).
11) Macknight, J. (2023) Will shadow bank contagion impact traditional banks?, The
Banker. Available at: https://www.thebanker.com/Will-shadow-bank-contagion-
impact-traditional-banks-1676974200 (Accessed: 24 November 2023).
12) Magkonis, G., Oh, E.Y. and Zhang, S. (2022) On the macroeconomic effects of shadow
banking development, Working Papers in Economics & Finance. Available at:
https://repec.port.ac.uk/EconFinance/PBSEconFin_2022_06.pdf (Accessed: 20
November 2023).
13) Pozsar, Z. et al. (2013) Shadow Banking - Federal Reserve Bank of New York,
NewYorkfed.org. Available at:
https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/epr/2013/0713adri.pdf
(Accessed: 21 November 2023).
14) Tarullo , D.K. (2012) Speech by governor Tarullo on shadow banking after the
financial crisis, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Available at:
https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/tarullo20120612a.htm
(Accessed: 21 November 2023).