Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 6 - Suggested Reading3
Lecture 6 - Suggested Reading3
PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE IN
HRM: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF HR
PROFESSIONALS
BRADFORD S. BELL, SAE-WON LEE, AND
SARAH K. YEUNG
Correspondence to: Bradford S. Bell, Assistant Professor, Cornell University, 386 Ives Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853,
Phone: (607) 254-8054, Fax: (607) 255-1836, E-mail: bb92@cornell.edu
Human Resource Management, Fall 2006, Vol. 45, No. 3, Pp. 295–308
© 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com).
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.20113
1099050x, 2006, 3, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hrm.20113 by University Of Malta, Wiley Online Library on [18/09/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
296 HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, Fall 2006
bank, 1999; Ulrich, 1997). This means mov- key trends in the changing nature of HR
ing beyond administrative expertise and be- competence, and excerpts from the inter-
coming an expert in areas such as strategic views are used to provide a deeper examina-
business partnership, change management, tion of these trends. We conclude the article
and employee advocacy (Ulrich, 1997; with a discussion of the practical implica-
Wright, Dyer, & Takla, 1999). Although this tions of these findings, focusing special at-
transformation has been gradual, there is ev- tention on identifying strategies that can be
idence that the roles and responsibilities of used to develop the competencies that HR
HR professionals are evolving professionals need to be successful in an e-
(Lawler & Mohrman, 2003). HR environment. In addition, we discuss the
…evidence An important implication of boundary conditions of our findings and
this transformation is that it may highlight future research avenues.
suggests that change the competencies that HR
professionals must master in
leading firms have HR Competencies
order to be successful. Baill
shifted from a focus (1999), for example, has sug- Losey (1999) notes that today, human resource
gested that “traditional” HR com- management is a profession with its own body
on HR administration petencies have not gone away, of knowledge. Over the past decade-and-a-
but rather must be supplemented half, efforts have been undertaken to define
to a focus on more with additional skills, such as a this body of knowledge and examine its trans-
strategic issues better understanding of the busi- formation over time. For example, in 1998,
ness. Brockbank, Ulrich, and the Society for Human Resource Management
(e.g., Yeung, Beatty (1999) also note that over (SHRM) studied the future-oriented competen-
the past decade HR professionals cies of HR professionals. The study revealed a
Brockbank, & Ulrich, have needed to be more knowl- set of core HR competencies, including cus-
edgeable about financial manage- tomer focus, assessment and measurement
1994) and that this
ment and external competitive skills, and technology expertise.
shift has and customer demands. In sum, In this study, we utilize the competency
evidence suggests that leading framework developed by Ulrich, Brockbank,
implications for the firms have shifted from a focus and their colleagues (e.g., Brockbank et al.,
on HR administration to a focus 1999; Ulrich, Brockbank, & Yeung, 1989; Ul-
competencies that
on more strategic issues (e.g., rich, Brockbank, Yeung, & Lake, 1995). This
define the success Yeung, Brockbank, & Ulrich, work has identified three primary domains of
1994) and that this shift has im- HR competence: knowledge of the business,
of HR professionals. plications for the competencies delivery of HR practices, and change manage-
that define the success of HR pro- ment. In light of the growing integration of
fessionals. technology into the HR function, recent up-
In the current article, we use dates to these models have often included a
data collected through interviews with sen- fourth domain of competence: technology
ior HR professionals from 19 Fortune 500 expertise (Brockbank & Ulrich, 2003; Hunter,
companies to examine the linkage between 1999; Schoonover, 2003). Given our specific
e-HR and the reshaping of professional com- focus on the impact of technology on profes-
petence in HRM. As noted earlier, informa- sional competence in the HR field, we have
tion technology has been identified as an adopted this four-dimensional model. Each
impetus of HR’s transition to becoming a of the four categories is briefly described in
strategic business partner (e.g., Lawler & the sections that follow.
Mohrman, 2003). In this study, we extend
this work one step further and explore the Knowledge of the Business
role of information technology in shaping
the competency requirements of HR profes- Ulrich et al. (1989) state, “Knowledge of the
sionals. The interview data is used to extract business refers to the extent to which an HR
professional understands the financial, mines the credibility and professional re-
strategic, and technological capabilities of an spect that they will command from others.
organization” (pp. 315–316). There is grow-
ing recognition that to be successful in HR, Change Management
individuals need more than HR knowledge;
they need to know the business and under- HR professionals who have the capacity to
stand its language (Bates, 2002). Specific manage change are able to “increase an or-
competencies that fall within this category ganization’s capability for change
include the ability to align HR strategies with through creating meaning, prob-
business vision and the ability to consult lem solving, relationship influ- There is growing
with line management to analyze and solve ence, innovation, transforma-
problems (Kochanski & Ruse, 1996; Svoboda tion, and role influence” (Ulrich recognition that to
& Schröder, 2001; Ulrich et al., 1995). et al., 1989, p. 316). Effective
HR professionals must understand how change agents are able to diag- be successful in HR,
their business creates profit and they must be nose and solve problems, build individuals need
able to view issues from the perspective of cus- relationships, articulate a vision,
tomers (Yeung, Woolcock, & Sullivan, 1996). set a leadership agenda, and im- more than HR
A greater understanding of the business al- plement goals. They are also able
lows HR professionals to partner with com- to help overcome and manage in- knowledge; they
munications professionals to ensure that busi- dividual resistance to change that
need to know the
ness messages are well understood by the often inhibits organizational
workforce (Baill, 1999). In addition, Lawler adaptability (Ulrich et al., 1995). business and
and Mohrman (2003) argue that business acu- To be effective change agents, HR
men allows HR professionals to combine their professionals must also anticipate understand its
expertise with the expertise of line manage- new challenges and develop-
language.
ment to solve business problems. That is, HR ments, be able to detect trends
professionals must be able to use their busi- and early signals, and initiate
ness knowledge to make strategic contribu- flexibility in fast-changing busi-
tions (Brockbank & Ulrich, 2003). Compe- ness environments (Svoboda & Schröder,
tence in this domain is viewed by many as the 2001). Companies today operate in a fast-
key to HR professionals making the transition paced and rapidly changing business envi-
to serving as a strategic business partner. ronment, which means that an increasingly
important element of HR’s value proposition
stems from the ability to help create an over-
Delivery of HR Practices
all organizational capacity for change.
Competence in this area refers to “knowing
and being able to deliver state-of-the-art, in- Technology Expertise
novative HR practices” (Ulrich et al., 1995).
In essence, HR professionals must be experts As information technology emerges as a key
in their specialties. In particular, HR profes- delivery vehicle for HR services, it becomes
sionals must have competence in areas such increasingly important for HR professionals
as staffing, development, compensation, and to demonstrate technology expertise. As
employee and labor relations (Lawson & Hunter (1999, p. 148) notes, “Because of the
Limbrick, 1996). However, competence in ever-broadening scope of information tech-
this area goes beyond knowledge; it requires nology, particularly Web-based solutions,
HR professionals to deliver HR practices to varying degrees of technological ability also
organizational members. Expertise in the are generally required.” In particular, HR pro-
functional areas of HR is critical to being able fessionals need to be able to use HR technol-
to deliver state-of-the-art, innovative HR ogy and Web-based channels to deliver serv-
practices that add value, and HR profession- ices to employees (Brockbank & Ulrich,
als’ competence in this area largely deter- 2003). They must be proficient with HR in-
occurred within three firms in our sample, started to implement ad hoc e-HR initiatives
and the data from the multiple respondents to an organization that relies heavily on
were combined for analysis. technology for most of its HR functions.
Among the HR functions that the companies
Interview Methodology are transferring to technological applica-
tions, data management/employee record
Phone interviews were conducted with the 19 keeping (100%) and payroll and benefits
executives. Each participant was asked to an- (73.7%) were mentioned most frequently.
swer two questions regarding (1) the ways in Companies indicated that the desire to auto-
which the HR function in the company uti- mate these transactional HR tasks served as
lizes information technology and (2) how the an impetus for the decision to integrate in-
competency (i.e., knowledge, skills, and abili- formation technology into the HR function.
ties) requirements for HR professionals in Training and development (47.4%),
their organization have changed, if at all, as a staffing (36.8%), and performance
result of their e-HR initiatives. Occasionally, management (36.8%) were also
interviewers would pose follow-up questions named as important e-HR do-
to explore an issue, but our goal was to utilize mains. In the training area, e-HR Companies
a nondirective approach that would provide was used for centralized online reg-
unbiased responses and yield insight into istration, classroom management, indicated that the
those issues that the executives viewed as and record keeping. In the area of desire to automate
most critical. The interviews were recorded recruitment and selection, e-HR
and transcribed. The first two authors inde- was used for more basic transac- these transactional
pendently coded responses to the second tional activities, such as job post-
question. Specifically, the authors evaluated ing and résumé collection, as well HR tasks served as
whether each of the four competency do- as more strategic activities such as
an impetus for the
mains was indicated to be: (1) more important generating metrics on time to fill
than in the past, (2) unchanged, (3) less im- positions and yield ratios. For per- decision to integrate
portant than in the past, or (4) not men- formance appraisal, technology
tioned.2 This temporal comparison was was used as a mechanism for col- information
deemed appropriate since our focus was on lecting and analyzing employee
technology into the
how the relative importance of different com- performance information. For ex-
petency domains has changed since the adop- ample, employees and managers at HR function.
tion of e-HR. A preliminary examination of one large multinational company
the interview data revealed that representa- utilize online forms for annual per-
tives tended to distinguish between the deliv- formance-appraisal and develop-
ery of transactional or administrative HR (e.g., ment discussions. The results are stored online
payroll and record keeping) and the delivery and used for succession-planning purposes.
of functional HR practices (e.g., staffing, train- The replacement of the paper process saved
ing, and performance management). Thus, over one million pieces of paper, plus the time
delivery of HR practices was further divided and energy of HR and line managers.
into transactional/administrative HR compe-
tencies and functional HR competencies.
Impact of e-HR on HR Competence
viewed earlier (e.g., Lawler & Mohrman, ing and let’s analyze this to help make
2003), it appears that e-HR plays a key role in better business decisions.
allowing HR professionals to focus attention
on the strategic business partner role. Specif- While respondents indicated that e-HR
ically, 68.4% of the respondents indicated has facilitated this shift in HR activities, they
that e-HR has made it more important for HR also noted that the skill sets possessed by their
professionals within their organization to HR staff determine whether this new model is
possess knowledge of the business. successful. Specifically, respondents indicated
Respondents also indicated that within that for HR professionals to be successful con-
their firms, e-HR has allowed HR professionals sultants, they need to understand the busi-
to shift their attention from administrative ness, be able to think strategically and analyt-
tasks to a more strategic business role. One re- ically, and be able to assist management in
spondent stated the following example: making decisions that are right for the busi-
ness. For example, one respondent noted that
Where you really change the composi- being a strategic business partner means:
tion [of HR] is when you get into things
like self-service and you eliminate as . . . engaging at the senior manage-
much administrative activity out of the ment levels and helping them with
HR as you can. Then you refocus the ef- knowing the tactical and strategic is-
forts of your workforce toward value- sues, with getting the most out of the
added activities such as consulting and people in an optimum way, and to
strategic business support. That needs a make the right decisions with regard to
different kind of workforce than the ad- resources and utilization of people for
ministrative support environment. that organization.
business partner. This new role places a change in their role in terms of their fo-
greater premium on HR professionals’ cusing less on administrative tasks and
knowledge of the business and their ability more on having more of a consulting
to use that knowledge to work with manage- role for the managers . . .
ment to devise strategic business solutions.
In light of this trend, one may be tempted
to downplay the overall importance of com-
Delivery of HR Practices
petency in HR delivery. However, nearly half
Given the trend toward using e-HR to auto- (47.4%) of our respondents indicated that
mate transactional HR functions and refocus e-HR has made competence in functional HR
attention on being directly involved in the delivery more important. These respondents
business, it is not surprising that 68.4% of indicated that by reducing admin-
our respondents indicated that competency istrative and transactional respon-
in transactional/administrative HR delivery sibilities, e-HR has allowed HR staff Benefits,
is less important as a result of information within their organizations to adopt
technology. Benefits, compensation, and more specialized roles, which re- compensation, and
staffing were commonly mentioned as areas quires a higher level of expertise
staffing were
in which many routine transactions are now within specific functional areas of
performed electronically. This trend goes HR (e.g., staffing, training, per- commonly
hand-in-hand with the push toward reposi- formance management). Consider,
tioning HR professionals as strategic business for example, the quotes below mentioned as areas
partners. The excerpts from respondents from two respondents:
highlighted below illustrate this trend: in which many
It significantly also has required routine transactions
Well, for one, HR does not need to an upgrade in the particular
know much about benefits delivery functional areas—so leadership are now performed
anymore since it has been digitized. development people may have
been training and development electronically. This
Because we have been able to put people before—we now need trend goes hand-in-
many things online and provide em- people who can assess talent . . .
ployees and managers with their own In the compensation area, we hand with the push
access to it, we don’t have to process have gone out and got highly
benefits enrollment or answer basic technical people from a comp toward repositioning
questions anymore. point of view . . . Now we have
HR professionals as
professional, fully trained, certi-
. . . so all of the self-service that’s going fied comp professionals in the strategic business
out does allow us to streamline the back organization.
office or administrative side of the equa- I think it forces you to get a partners.
tion, so the HR function does change. lot more professional and met-
rics-driven and process-driven
Résumés are organized automati- about everything you do as an HR
cally—no HR people are needed to do team . . . So, we need people that are
the transaction now. In the past, HR content experts . . . people with process
people had to create the requisition, expertise who fundamentally grasp the
contact outside agencies, advertising, wisdom of having reliable methods
responding to résumés—all is done and processes for carrying out our HR
electronically. functions.
We do still think the HR generalist So, overall, our results suggest that e-HR
population ratios will stay fairly consis- has not resulted in less importance being
tent, we are looking for there to be a placed on expertise in HR delivery, but rather
has resulted in a greater emphasis being placed important as a result of their utilization of
on functional HR excellence and more special- information technology in the HR function.
ized HR roles and responsibilities. Among All of these respondents argued that the shift
many of our respondents, this shift to special- to e-HR has meant that HR professionals
ization was viewed as essential for developing need to be computer-literate and comfort-
HR solutions that add value to the business. able with technologies (e.g., the Web) so that
e-HR is fully integrated into the HR role. One
respondent added that, within his/her firm,
Change Management
there has also been an increase in the num-
One of the most unexpected re- ber of people with advanced technological
sults of our survey concerned how backgrounds within the HR function. Specif-
infrequently participants men- ically, the individual stated:
E-HR has meant that
tioned competencies falling within
HR professionals the domain of change manage- Ten years ago, in HR, we would have
ment. Only two of the respondents virtually 0% of our workforce that had
need to be indicated that e-HR has resulted in an IT or computer science background.
a greater emphasis being placed on Now, we have about 20% and a dedi-
computer-literate
HR professionals’ ability to serve as cated HR IT team embedded inside of
and comfortable with change agents. These respondents the HR function that enables all of the
argued that HR professionals must processes to move to Web locations and
technologies (e.g., drive culture change to support to be supported electronically.
self-service HR systems. Specifi-
the Web) so that e- cally, HR professionals need to Although these findings suggest a link be-
HR is fully integrated help managers and employees em- tween e-HR and technological competence,
brace these tools and take responsi- this theme was not predominant in our in-
into the HR role. bility for managing their own and terviews. In many organizations, the devel-
others’ employment information. opment of e-HR systems is either outsourced
However, none of our respondents or handled by internal information technol-
spoke to the issue of HR professionals driving ogy specialists. The end systems used by HR
broader organizational change. This is surpris- professionals may be designed to simplify
ing, given the growing need for organizations transactions and be user-friendly and, there-
to possess a capacity for change so that the rate fore, may not require a high level of techno-
of internal adaptive change is commensurate logical expertise on the part of the HR staff.
with the rapid rate of change in the external Accordingly, more important than technol-
environment (Ulrich et al., 1995). It is possible ogy expertise may be the need for HR profes-
that because the forces (e.g., globalization, cus- sionals to manage their partnership with the
tomer expectations) that are driving this IT function and ensure that the applications
change are external to the business, e-HR helps that are developed meet targeted HR and
HR cope with change but does not alter the business needs. Consistent with this argu-
importance of HR professionals’ change man- ment, one respondent noted the following:
agement competencies.
HR has to form a very strong partner-
ship with the IT function, who will ac-
Technology Expertise
tually build the application or assist HR
The final category of competence we exam- with finding the right vendor who has
ined focuses on technology expertise. Our the right application. I think that HR
findings suggest that e-HR has not resulted has had to develop many skills—pro-
in a substantial change in the technology ex- gram/project management, partnering.
pertise required of HR professionals. The re- HR doesn’t have the skills to do the
sults revealed that 36.8% of our sample be- project but they have to manage the
lieved technology expertise is more project and the application launch.
» Active learning
• Participants learn by tackling real problems with real » Work-integrated learning experiences
implications. Knowledge connections formed through
experience and experimentation.
» Experiential variety
• Participants apply their knowledge and skills in a
variety of situations. Breadth of experience builds » Rotational development programs
contextual knowledge necessary for strategic
application.
» Learning from errors
• Participants learn from their mistakes. Errors » After-action reviews
broaden knowledge and highlight when strategies
are appropriate and inappropriate.
can make the classroom a more “hands-on” dividuals with an opportunity to apply their
learning environment, it is unlikely that knowledge and skills in a variety of different
what students learn in the classroom will pre- situations (Ford & Kraiger, 1995). Our inter-
pare them to walk into a strategic business view data suggest that, at least in some com-
partner role (Baill, 1999). As Hernez-Broome panies, e-HR has stimulated a trend toward
and Hughes (2004) argue, “[D]evelopmental moving HR staff into more specialized func-
experiences are likely to have the greatest im- tional roles. One unintended consequence of
pact when they can be linked to or embedded this action, however, may be a limiting of the
in a person’s ongoing work and when they experiential variety that is critical for the de-
are an integrated set of experiences” (p. 25). velopment of strategic competence. As
Deutsche Bank, for example, transformed Lawler and Mohrman (2003) state, “HR func-
its HR function through work-integrated tions should focus on providing their HR pro-
learning in which participants develop com- fessionals with many different development
petence through tackling real problems. Svo- opportunities . . . that broaden and deepen
boda and Schröder (2001) note that using their knowledge and experience bases rele-
real challenges as learning opportunities vant to being a strategic partner” (p. 28).
means that individuals have to consider the An optimal strategy, then, may be to
implications of their actions within the larger move individuals into specialized roles only
organizational environment. Development after they have had exposure to a variety of
activities that stress active learning can help developmental experiences. In recent years,
strengthen HR professionals’ understanding many companies have instituted rotational
of the connections between their HR and development programs for new entrants to
business knowledge and develop their capac- the HR function (Kuok & Bell, 2005). One
ity to adapt their HR expertise to solve differ- specific program that has received recogni-
ent types of business problems. tion is General Electric’s Human Resource
Leadership Program (HRLP). The program
combines rotational assignments, educa-
Experiential Variety
tional seminars, and networking to provide a
A second critical condition for developing variety of developmental experiences (Baill,
strategic competence involves providing in- 1999). Further, the program requires partici-
nisms through which e-HR shapes and rede- costs and reduce the size of HR” (p. 22). Yet,
fines the HR function. Previous research has the data collected through our interviews
emphasized the fact that technology can be suggests that in many companies, e-HR is a
used to perform many of the routine, admin- driving force in the transformation of the HR
istrative HR functions, thereby allowing HR function. Perhaps more important, our data
professionals to focus their time and energies suggest that this transformation is reshaping
on more strategic business issues (Brockbank, the competencies that define HR profession-
1999; Ulrich, 1997). Our research provides als’ success. Now more than ever, HR profes-
support for this argument, as highlighted by sionals are expected to demonstrate skill in
the respondent comments presented earlier. adapting HR practices to changing business
However, e-HR may also be driving other conditions. This strategic competence will
changes that influence the strategic align- require a synthesis of HR professionals’ ex-
ment of the HR function. For example, HRIS pertise in HR delivery and their business
can facilitate the collection and analysis of knowledge. Recognizing that developmental
data needed to quantify the impact of HR on experiences are one of many levers (e.g., as-
important organizational outcomes. These sessment, performance management, etc.)
metrics can then be used by HR professionals that can be used for competency develop-
to validate and market the function to top ment, we have highlighted three learning
management. Future research into these is- strategies that have proven successful for de-
sues can help provide greater insight into ex- veloping strategic competence. Our hope is
actly how e-HR is reshaping professional that as companies implement e-HR initia-
competence in the field of HR. tives, they will be able to use these strategies
to help prepare HR professionals to fulfill
their new roles and responsibilities.
Conclusion
It is important to recognize that not all com-
Acknowledgment
panies are utilizing information technology
to move HR toward becoming a strategic The authors would like to thank the Center for
business partner. As Lawler and Mohrman Advanced Human Resource Studies (CAHRS)
(2003) state, “[S]ome companies may be in- and the center’s executive director, Pamela Stepp,
vesting in IT simply to reduce transaction for invaluable assistance with this project.
BRADFORD S. BELL is an assistant professor in the School of Industrial and Labor Rela-
tions at Cornell University. He received his BA in psychology from the University of
Maryland at College Park and his MA and PhD in industrial and organizational psychol-
ogy from Michigan State University. His research focuses primarily on issues surround-
ing training and development, both at the individual and team levels. His work has ap-
peared in a number of book chapters and journals, including the Journal of Applied
Psychology, Personnel Psychology, and Group and Organization Management. He has
also consulted for a number of both public and private orgtanizations.
Landis, J., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observations. Human Resource Management, 36,
observer agreement for categorical data. Biomet- 175–179.
rics, 33, 159–174.
Ulrich, D., Brockbank, W., & Yeung, A. (1989). Beyond
Lawler, E. E., & Mohrman, S. A. (2003). HR as a strate- belief: A benchmark for human resources. Human
gic partner: What does it take to make it happen? Resource Management, 28, 311–335.
Human Resource Planning, 26, 15–29.
Ulrich, D., Brockbank, W., Yeung, A. K., & Lake, D. G.
Lawson, T. E., & Limbrick, V. (1996). Critical competen- (1995). Human resource competencies: An empiri-
cies and developmental experiences for top HR ex- cal assessment. Human Resource Management,
ecutives. Human Resource Management, 35, 34, 473–495.
67–85.
Wright, P., Dyer, L., & Takla, M. (1999). State-of-the-art
Losey, M. R. (1999). Mastering the competencies of and practice council report. New York: The Human
HR management. Human Resource Management, Resource Planning Society.
38, 99–102.
Yeung, A. (1996). Competencies for HR professionals:
Schoonover, S. C. (2003). Human resource competen- An interview with Richard E. Boyatzis. Human Re-
cies for the new century. Falmouth, MA: source Management, 35, 119–131.
Schoonover Associates.
Yeung, A., Brockbank, W., & Ulrich, D. (1994). Lower
Svoboda, M., & Schröder, S. (2001). Transforming cost, high value: Human resources function in
human resources in the new economy: Developing transition. Human Resource Planning, 17, 1–6.
the next generation of global HR managers at
Yeung, A., Woolcock, P., & Sullivan, J. (1996). Identify-
Deutsche Bank AG. Human Resource Management,
ing and developing HR competencies for the fu-
40, 261–273.
ture: Keys to sustaining the transformation of HR
Ulrich, D. (1997). HR of the future: Conclusions and functions. Human Resource Planning, 19, 48–58.