This article discusses a debate around whether history of psychology should be considered a subject or field of study on its own. While history of psychology is taught, it is not recognized as a specialization or area of research. The author cites various books and articles to provide context around the origins and purpose of documenting the history of psychology, which is to learn from past achievements and recommendations to inform the present and future. However, some claims in the article are not well supported.
This article discusses a debate around whether history of psychology should be considered a subject or field of study on its own. While history of psychology is taught, it is not recognized as a specialization or area of research. The author cites various books and articles to provide context around the origins and purpose of documenting the history of psychology, which is to learn from past achievements and recommendations to inform the present and future. However, some claims in the article are not well supported.
This article discusses a debate around whether history of psychology should be considered a subject or field of study on its own. While history of psychology is taught, it is not recognized as a specialization or area of research. The author cites various books and articles to provide context around the origins and purpose of documenting the history of psychology, which is to learn from past achievements and recommendations to inform the present and future. However, some claims in the article are not well supported.
psychology is a subject or a field of degree as a requirement for professional organization. According to Brock most psychologist published history of psychology was self-taught. He also stated that history of psychology is not recognized as a specialization or a research. The author cited from different books and articles for a clear view as to what history of psychology for and its beginning, and how it helps the past to present recommendations.
Summary
Its somehow confusing that history of
psychology is taught as a subject, bur not actually a subject, neither a research. Brock arguments is shifting from one to another. Subject taught as an specialization, for professional organization and shift to none argument study. But focusing on the its history as what this article is all about. When and what is the purpose of history of psychology for. To celebrate the achievement from the past and to explore the upcoming future. Maybe to correct some behavior. Some inserts of this article are anomalies from published books that have no proof or stand that support the author.
Clearly this article is all about information being
published in psychology books. Perhaps this a hindsight for us readers on how we will manage information the books.