Professional Documents
Culture Documents
fact
Introduction
INTERPRETATION OF TERM’S
Question of law
QUESTION OF FACT:
Conclusion:
Introduction
It is commonly said that all questions which arise for
consideration in a Court of justice are of two kinds. They are either question of
law or question of fact. It becomes very difficult to create difference between
question of law and question of fact. Question of law consisted on the
theoretical rules and it is answered by judges by using different rules of law to
determine the case. And question of fact consisted on facts and it is
determined by jury in the light of facts and evidences relevant to case. In
question of fact burden of proof on plaintiff and such proof shows that
violation is occurred.
Kinds of
Questions
According To Salmond:
A question which is authoritatively answered based on
legal affairs are question of law.
According To Salmond:
The term question of law is used in three distinct senses:
According To Salmond:
There are also some questions which are partly questions of fact and
partly law. Such questions are called mixed questions of law and fact.
Thus, the question whether a partnership exists between parties calls for
the determination of two questions:
i. What agreement has been made between them
(question of fact)
ii. Whether such agreement is sufficient to constitute the
legal relationship of partnership (question of law).
According To Salmond:
The existence and development of a legal system represents the
transformation of questions of fact and judicial discretion into questions
of law. As more and more cases are decided, identical decisions are
given by the judges in those cases which have similar facts. If the facts of
the two cases are identical, the discretion of the judge disappears and he
is bound to give his decision according to the precedent on the subject.
Conclusion:
To conclude that, all matters and questions which come before
court of justice either are question of law or question of fact or judge’s
discretion. Interpretation of a particular provision of law is a question of law
but once it has been interpreted by a superior court, it becomes a question of
law, in such cases the judicial opinion is excluded and discretion of the judge
ruled out question of law has to be decided according to a given rule of law
and question of fact has to be decided according to the facts of each case.