THE SIMILITUDE OF RAFIDAH, JEWS AND CHRISTIAN IN MANY ASPECTS

Among them is Abdullah bin Saba, a Jew from Sana‟a (a city in Yemen) who was exiled to
Sababat (in Iran), and Abdullah bin Yasar who was exiled to Khazar. The sign of this is that the
ordeal of the Shia Rafidah is similar to that of the Jews: The Jews said nobody deserves to be a
king but a person from Prophet‟s David‟s (a.s) family and the Shia said nobody deserves to be an
Imam (leader) but a person from the family of Ali bin Abi Talib (r.a). The Jews says Jihad (fighting
in the cause of Allah) has been suspended until the appearance of Anti-Christ and descending of
a sword from the sky and the Shia says there will be no Jihad in the path of Allah until the
appearance of the Mahdi and a caller made an announcement (on Jihad) from the sky. The Jews
delays Magrib (sunset) prayer until the stars are ablaze in the sky and the Shia act likewise. And
this contradicted the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allah for he said: “My community will continue
to be on natural disposition (the correct religion) as per as they didn‟t delay sunset prayer until
the stars are ablaze” (Abu Dawud, Ibn Majah, Ahmad). The Jews (while praying) divert a little
from their Qiblat (direction of prayer) and Shia does the same thing. The Jews close their eyes
while praying and Shia does the same thing. The Jews do not stipulate waiting period for
divorced women, so also Shia Rafidah. The Jews altered Torah and Shia Rafidah altered the
Qur‟an. The Jews says Allah made obligatory for them fifty prayers and Shia says the same thing.
The Jews do not sincerely great Muslims for they would say to them as-Sam alaikum (death be
on you), so do Shia Rafidah. The Jews don‟t eat some types of fishes such as catfish, perch and
fish fins; so also Shia Rafidah.14 The Jews do not eat rabbits and spleen, so do Rafidah.The Jews
do not wipe on socks in ablution, so also Shia Rafidah. The Jews believed that people‟s
properties are allowed for them to take and squander; the same with regard to Shia Rafidah. 15
Allah informed us about the saying of the Jews in the Qur‟an: “… Because they (Jews) say: „There
is no blame on us to betray and take the properties of the illiterates…‟” (4:75).
The Jews allowed the spilling of the blood of all Muslims and Shia Rafidah allows killing of
Muslims (see footnote 15 above). The Jews believed in cheating people, so also Shia Rafidah
(through deception and simulation - Taqiyyah). The Jews placed the side of their foreheads (and
not their foreheads) in Morning Prayer and Shia Rafidah does the same. The Jews do not bow
down in prayer until they nod their heads many times and Rafidah does the same thing. The Jews
despise Gabriel, and they say, “He is our enemy from amongst the Angels.” The Shia Rafidah say;
“Gabriel made a mistake in giving the revelation to Prophet Muhammad (saw) – instead of Ali.”
Shia Rafidah agrees with Christian in one trait; the Christian women are not given dowry for they
are enjoyed for pleasure, the same thing with regard to Rafidah creed; they conduct temporary
marriage and allow temporary marriage. THE JEWS AND CHRISTIANS ARE BETTER THAN THE
SHIA, for when the Jews are asked, who have ever been the best of all the Jews, they replied:
“The companions of Moses” and when the Christians are asked who are the best of all Christians
that have existed, they said: “The companions of Jesus.” And when the Shia were asked who are
the worst amongst the Muslims that ever existed, they replied: “The Companions of Prophet
Muhammad.” They are commanded to seek forgiveness for them but they are abusing them.
Thus, the sword is drawn against them to the Last Day, their call will be defeated, their flag will
be vanquished and their affairs will be in disarray; whenever they kindled the fire of war Allah
extinguishes it, they are striving to cause mischief in the earth and Allah do not like mischief
makers.

VERDICT OF MUSLIMS SCHOLARS ON SHIA RAFIDAH

We will explain – by the grace of Allah and His aid – the path of righteousness as we have named
that book the path to regret – by the Power and strength of Allah. This man has followed the
footsteps of his predecessors, the scholars of Rafidah, such as Ibn Mu‟aman al-Mufid and those
who followed him such as Karajiki, Abul Qasim al-Musawi, Tusi and others like them.

Absolutely, Shia Rafidah are not men of knowledge and experience with the methodologies of
debates, argumentations and identifying evidences and what they contained of exceptions and
contradictions. They are also ignorant with regard to textual evidences; hadiths and Sunnah and
differentiating between its sound and its weak narrations. Their reliance with regard to textual
evidences is totally on historical narrations that have cut off chains of authorities and those who
are known to be liars and or atheists have fabricated most of it. There scholars depended in their
acceptance of textual evidences on people like Abi Mikhnaf Lut bin Yahaya and Hisham al-Kalbi
and others like them who are known to be liars by those who possess knowledge. Those are the
best type of people upon whom they rely in accepting hadiths narrations for they use to defend
and accept hadiths from those who are crass ignorant, liars who are not even mentioned in
books of biographies and those who are versed in the science of biographies of those who
transmitted hadiths knew nothing about them.
Scholars who are versed in transmission of hadith, its narration and the science of chain of
transmitters of hadith have all agreed upon the fact that Shia Rafidah are the greatest liar among
all sects (that ascribe themselves to Islam). Lying among them is of old and that is why Muslim
scholars knew that they are specialist in telling too much liars.
Abu Hatim ar-Razi said he heard Yunus bin Abdul „Ala saying, Ashhab bin Abdul „Aziz said: Imam
Malik was asked about Rafidah and he replied; “Don‟t talk to them and report (hadith) from
them for they are liars.” Abu Hatim said, Harmala informed us that he heard Imam Shafi‟i saying:
“I never see a people that give false witness more than Rafidah.” Mu‟umil bin Ahab said, I heard
Yazid bin Harun saying: “We write knowledge (accept hadith) from all innovators, if he does not
propagate his innovation except Rafidah, for they are liars.” Muhammad bin Sa‟id al-Isfahani
said, I heard Shuraik saying: “Take (accept) knowledge from whoever you meet except Rafidah,
for they fabricate hadiths and take it as religion.” This man Shuraik is Shuraik bin Abdullah al-
Qadi, he is the judge of Kufa and a contemporary of Imam ath-Thawri and Imam Abu Hanifa said,
he is among the (moderate) Shia, who used to say that he is a Shia and yet this is his verdict
regarding them. Abu Mu‟awiyyah said, I heard al-„Amash saying: “I meet people and they do not
identify them but as liars.” He means the companions of Mughirah bin Sa‟id. Al-„Amash said:
“There is no problem if you remember this; because I do not feel at ease from their side for one
day they will say we caught al-„Amash with a woman (meaning they are slanderers).” What we
are aiming at narrating these is to prove that all scholars have agreed that lying among Rafidah is
more pronounced than in any other sect of the sects that affiliate themselves to Islam.
The source of Shia Rafidah‟s innovation is Zandaqah18 and atheism. Lying intentionally among
them is universal, they confess this fact when they states that our religion is based on simulation
(Taqiyyah), which means one of them will utter with his tongue what contradicts what is in his
heart, and this is lying and hypocrisy and they are saying that they are the only believers among
the rest of the Muslims. They are describing the first and foremost to embrace Islam (Muhajirun
and Ansar) as apostates and hypocrites. They are the embodiment of the maxim: “She shot me
with her defect and slip away.” This is because there is no sect among those who affiliate
themselves to Islam who are closer to hypocrisy and apostasy more than them and you will not
find apostates and hypocrites in any sect in such a large number as you will find among their
sects, just consider on this note the extremist among the Nusairiyyah and others, consider also
the heretics, Ismailiyyah and their like.
They rely in jurisprudence on what has been related to them from some members of the
Prophet‟s family (progeny), and in what is narrated to them there is what is sound and there is
what is intentional liars or mistake. They are not endowed with the knowledge of sound
transmitted narrations and its weak ones like the scholars of hadiths and even if narrations are
sound from those men, the Shia Rafidah has built accepting a narration of one of those people
upon three principles: On that, any one of those is infallible just like the Messenger of Allah
(s.a.w). (Secondly), on that, whatever one of those says is saying it on the authority of the
Messenger of Allah (s.a.w), and they are claiming infallibility in that transmission. Thirdly, on
that, the consensus of the Prophet‟s progeny is an authority and then they are claiming that the
Prophet‟s progeny are twelve men and that whatever any of them stated has been agreed upon
by all of them. This then is their principles of jurisprudence and it is false principles – we will
explain this in the right place. They do not rely on Qur‟an and neither on hadith and they do
accept the consensus of the Muslim community except if an infallible Imam is among them. They
do not also accept analogy even if it is very clear. With regard to their intellectual
argumentations and theories their latter scholars depend completely on the books of
Mu‟tazilites. The Mu‟tazilites are more rational than them and more truthful and none among
the Mu‟tazilites is condemning the Caliphate of Abubakar, Umar and Uthman (r.a); nay, they
have all agreed upon the caliphate of those three. With regard to appraising the best person
after the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w); they (the early Mu‟tazilites) generally prefer Abubakar and
then Umar (r.a), but their latter generation use to tarry when it come to preference and some of
them prefer Ali (r.a) and thus between them and Zaidiyyah there is a relationship in beliefs;
Oneness of Allah, justice, Imamah (leadership) and preference.