You are on page 1of 8

Crafting a dissertation is an arduous task that demands extensive research, critical analysis, and a

deep understanding of the subject matter. When it comes to the intricate realm of law and the
sensitive topic of euthanasia, the challenges are even more pronounced. Students tackling a law
dissertation on euthanasia find themselves navigating through complex legal frameworks, ethical
considerations, and a myriad of perspectives.

The difficulty lies not only in the depth of legal knowledge required but also in the ability to
synthesize information, present a compelling argument, and adhere to the rigorous academic
standards expected in a dissertation. From the initial stages of topic selection to the final polishing of
the conclusion, the journey is marked by countless hours of reading, writing, and revising.

Given the complexity of the task, it's not uncommon for students to seek assistance in the form of
professional writing services. While numerous options are available, one stands out for its
commitment to quality and reliability – ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔. This platform understands the
unique challenges posed by a law dissertation on euthanasia and offers specialized support to
students grappling with the intricacies of this subject.

Helpwriting.net provides a team of experienced writers well-versed in law and euthanasia-related


topics. These experts are adept at conducting in-depth research, analyzing legal precedents, and
articulating complex arguments with clarity and precision. By choosing ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔,
students can alleviate the burden of dissertation writing, ensuring that their work meets the highest
academic standards.

In conclusion, tackling a law dissertation on euthanasia is undeniably challenging. The complexities


of the subject matter, combined with the demanding nature of academic writing, make it a
formidable task. For those seeking a reliable solution, ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ emerges as a valuable
resource, offering specialized assistance to navigate the intricacies of a law dissertation on euthanasia.
A doctor who over a period of around thirty-five years in the medical profession was convicted of
killing over eighty of his patients with large doses of morphine. Humans have a very strong will to
live and will tolerate an exceedingly meagre quality of life before giving up. Physicians seem to
adhere to the criteria for due care in the large majority of cases. They add that as suicide is not a
crime, euthanasia should not be a. A strong focus on the moral, legal and philosophical responses to
euthanasia. In the Netherlands were voluntary euthanasia is legal it is believed that in 2000, 1200
people were euthenised without the consent of the patient. When one suffers from terminal illnesses
like cancer or a heart related illness, there are many implications in relation to what he goes through.
It has been argued that legalization of euthanasia will lead to disrespect for human life. The
conventional doctrine is that there is such an important moral and religious difference between the
two that, although the latter is sometimes permissible, the former is always forbidden. For this
reason doctors should be able to provide their patients a safe way out and enable them to enjoy their
last days. We recognize that life will not be free of suffering, that life will be burdensome, and there
will be tragedy. They say that human beings should be able to maintain their dignity up until the end
of their lives. That’s primary’. We have autonomy over our bodies in matters of life, and it should be
the same in matters of death. It is also of worry to governments that people may want to be put to
death because they think they have an incurable illness, when, in fact, this may prove to be a wrong
diagnosis. Spending all of the family money on one member of the family is a decision that can be
said to be dangerous in relation to the well being of the other family members. Her death allowed
her husband to move on in his life, remarrying 10 months later. This treatment is used in cancer
treatment as a way of destroying cancerous cells. Quill who was investigated but not indicted for his
participation in the suicide of a patient after he published his account of the incident. Legal
physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients
in “vulnerable” groups. A Death With Dignity Act failed in 2011, 2013, and 2015. Even though
medical sciences have improved a lot in terms of new drugs none of them promises a better life for
Aruna since three and a half decades. The second circumstance involves prescription of pain killing
medications, in situation where such medicines are known to have a likelihood of causing premature
or early death (Care, 2010). The law only allows people with serious and incurable illnesses to be
eligible, and the public healthcare system will cover it. The perfect way for students to engage in the
non-religious arguments for and against euthanasia and consider how far the law is fir for purpose
and if palliative care can offer a genuine alternative. ?9.00 Review 1 Select overall rating (no rating)
Your rating is required to reflect your happiness. In the health care world, few topics create a debate
as heated as euthanasia. We rank vendors based on rigorous testing and research, but also take into
account your feedback and our commercial agreements with providers. After all, euthanasia is
practised illegally anyway so wouldn’t it be much better to legalise it so it can be performed under
careful guidelines. The commonplace of euthanasia is inevitable; growing numbers of doctors will
continue to perform euthanasia secretly. Thus it may be possible that elderly relatives who think they
are burdens to their families ask for voluntary euthanasia out of a sense of duty to the family.
However, the quality of life worth living is one that only the person in question can define.
This argument maintains that both types amount to the death of a patient and if passive euthanasia
could be morally justified, active euthanasia could be done the same as well. The long term
disadvantages are that the treatment is time consuming and there are always a risk of the cancerous
cells regenerating after the treatment is through. Sometimes a distinction is made between normal
nutrition and hydration on one hand and medical nutritional support involving intravenous and naso-
gastric feeding on the other hand. Savings to the government may also become a consideration. One
of Aruna’s sisters wants her to be dying of natural causes and not being passively euthanized
(NDTV, 2011). Her death allowed her husband to move on in his life, remarrying 10 months later.
Pub: March 2011. Available at: (Accessed: 14 May 2013). Please refer to our instructions for authors
page for more information. GP Chi tren hay l? kho c?n xem nhi?u.pdf 1. GP Chi tren hay l? kho c?n
xem nhi?u.pdf HongBiThi1 Circulatory shock Cardiogenic Shock Hypovolemic Shock Sepsis, Septic
Shock an. He suffered severe brain haemorrhaging and serious brain damage. Euthanasia is a term
that was first applied in the 17th century, and the term was used to refer to a quick and painless
death. Therefore, in the legalisation of euthanasia, the diagnosis would have to be beyond a doubt
and it is questionable about whether there can always be medical certainty about what the condition
will entail and how long it will take to develop. Neither the oncologist, who administered the
injection nor the hospital had informed me or any of my siblings that our mother was even
considering euthanasia.” Precedent setting case at European Court of Human Rights “The slippery
slope is on full public display in Belgium, and we see the tragic consequences in this case. One, they
will lose control over their muscles, rendering them physically helpless, eventually forcing them to
remain bedridden and potentially connected to respiratory and other life-sustaining equipment. They
are not, and never have been, intended to make anyone suffer. In the light of humanitarian concept I
would rather suggest that Euthanasia is the only possible solution to release Aruna from the bonds
and chains of this deplorable and tormented life. With euthanasia no one's life is being saved, rather
life is only taken. They also say that life should not be violated and there is also a powerful message
of the importance of healing and care for the sick. How do we care for the terminally ill who is in a
lot of pain. Students normally respond very well to the variety of legal perspectives on euthanasia
and I have typically found the topic of what would be the 'perfect' legal response to euthanasia an
interesting option for further class debate. They add that as suicide is not a crime, euthanasia should
not be a. Many people fear that if euthanasia is legalized people would prefer not to have options on
the medicinal grounds and the fear of pain will take people to resort to this as a first option. Thus
any euthanasia process would have to establish, beyond any doubt, the true intentions of the patient
who is requesting euthanasia and that the patient is fully aware of the situation. Where every street
was awash with a million colours and little phrases. Furthermore, the victim’s relatives should not
have to watch their loved ones encounter unbearable suffering. Several states have begun to consider
legislation that would legalize active voluntary euthanasia. If someone’s standard of living is such
that they no longer want to live, then they should be able to end their life and, if necessary, be
assisted in doing so. Within eighteen months of Measure 16's passage, the State of Oregon
announced plans to cut back on health care coverage for poor state residents. Pentobarbital is also
one of the most common drugs used for assisted suicide, and in Mexico, it’s an affordable drug
that’s easy to purchase. This is 100% legal. You may not submit downloaded papers as your own,
that is cheating. Also you.
Humans have a very strong will to live and will tolerate an exceedingly meagre quality of life before
giving up. Ascertaining assisted suicide and euthanasia, as established options would revere this
diversity. See other similar resources ?4.00 1.00 1 review BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what
you were looking for. For example, it is questionable as to whether, if voluntary euthanasia was
legalised, people would be concerned about visiting hospitals, fearful of what might happen such as
an unwanted assisted death. The concept of animal welfare is an ethical concept to which, once
understood, science brings relevant data. Most members of the public have never seen a corpse and
many people have long ignored the spiritual dimension when they face the mystery of death. Our
customer service team will review your report and will be in touch. ?7.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY
NOW Save for later ?7.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 20 October
2019 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share through
facebook Share through pinterest AditiMalhotra03's Shop 2.50 2 reviews Not the right resource.
We’ll dig into which states permit the procedures and what they permit later. However, modern
medical care has relevant facilities to provide comfort and dignity to a dying patient without the
need of legalizing euthanasia. Firstly, i'll discuss the benefit in legalizing euthanasia, for it is a good
way of ultimately relieving extreme pain when a persons quality of life is low. None should be even
partly responsible for the erosion of that trust. But the family members, her brother has a different
opinion as he wanted her to have a peaceful death so that it gives an end to her unending ordeal
(Raghuram, 2011). Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 5(1), 62-76. Kappel, K.(2007). The
morality of euthanasia. It is quite obvious that there would be no way of creating a legal system that
would work well. However, it is against medical ethics to help a patient undertake euthanasia
because it defeats the logic of medicine. It is also questionable as to whether doctors can be sure that
they know and understand all the facts. If someone’s standard of living is such that they no longer
want to live, then they should be able to end their life and, if necessary, be assisted in doing so. We
rank vendors based on rigorous testing and research, but also take into account your feedback and
our commercial agreements with providers. Four years after the verdict being pronounced, Aruna
contracted pneumonia and died a natural death in 2015. A patient need not suffer months of agony
or live a life they no longer wish to live. He had attended the suicides of twenty eight people. More
and more countries and jurisdictions across the world are updating their laws to allow individuals
with serious, and typically fatal, health conditions to take control of this very difficult and personal
decision. Generally speaking, persons who are suicidal are treated as though their decision-making
capacity is compromised and health care providers often intervene and provide life-sustaining
treatments including involuntary psychiatric treatment over the objections of the patient. From this
point of view, it is more humane to instigate euthanasia on a severely suffering and terminally ill
patient, rather than subjecting such an individual to longer period of more pain and distress. A
complete account of how ADF International processes personal data can be found in our Privacy
Policy. Several statements for the Euthanasia argument arediscussed: a merciful response that
alleviates the suffering of patients which is sometimes wrongly perceived to be otherwise
unrelievable; the autonomy in which the patient has the right to make his own choices; the regulation
and legislation of existing practices of euthanasia to protect health care providers and patients. The
government should not have the right to give one group of people (e.g. doctors) the power to kill
another group of people (e.g. their patients). Take into account how well one really knows his or her
doctor. Christian Perspectives on euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicides. It is also meant as a
way of ensuring that cancerous cells do not spread to other parts of the body. She might feel dejected
about her life but currently unable to express them verbally.
A Death With Dignity Act failed in 2011, 2013, and 2015. Oregon in the US but have certain
conditions eg: the patient must be. Euthanasia as a practice is known to be administered to patients
who have suffered long illnesses and do not seem to show any form of improvements. One, they will
lose control over their muscles, rendering them physically helpless, eventually forcing them to remain
bedridden and potentially connected to respiratory and other life-sustaining equipment. From this
point of view, it is more humane to instigate euthanasia on a severely suffering and terminally ill
patient, rather than subjecting such an individual to longer period of more pain and distress. In this
essay, I will discuss the benefits and negatives in legalizing euthanasia. One of Aruna’s sisters wants
her to be dying of natural causes and not being passively euthanized (NDTV, 2011). I agree with the
Roman Catholic opinion that there is no need to prolong life by treatment which will only prolong
the suffering. A combination of anesthesia and a powerful barbiturate or sedative (typically
phenobarbital) ensures that the patient falls into a deep sleep prior to succumbing to cardiac arrest
from the barbiturate. It comes from the Greek words for good and death, and is commonly called
mercy killing. Ascertaining assisted suicide and euthanasia, as established options would revere this
diversity. For example, if a person is ill, their family may use this as an excuse to kill the person to
get their inheritance. This may not seem like a large or critically important position shift to someone
who lives, say, in the U.S. where doctors of neurologically unresponsive patients often agree or even
argue for those patients to be removed from life support (breathing and feeding tubes). Practioners)
Bill, 2006 is still pending in the parliament. According to the Bible, God is the Supreme Being and
the giver of life, and from this angle most of church faithful has argued that no man has the
authority over the life of another. Published weekly in full colour in both English and Gujarati it is
the biggest selling Gujarati publication outside India. They however were not killed to relieve
suffering, but because they were unable to work. There might be concerns that people may advance
theories against euthanasia, but taking into account the deterioration of the person both mentally and
physically, the traumatizing pain and the dejected solitary life- it must be put to an end in a dignified
manner. The surrounding services provided by medical professionals are covered by Australia’s
public health program. It is quite obvious that there would be no way of creating a legal system that
would work well. This is currently against the law in the United Kingdom although it was recently a
very large story line in the television soap “Eastenders”. It is for these drastic effects of terminal
illnesses that some countries chose to embrace euthanasia as the way out. When a person has full
rights to live their life to their full color it is also sensible that the person has rights to end their life
appropriately if at all there is no option in front of them. The author claims that homosexual marriage
is neither culturally nor physiologically possible and it is a. This, for me, boldly underlines the
frailties of the British Justice System. He suffered severe brain haemorrhaging and serious brain
damage. Start with the introduction to euthanasia lesson, followed by euthanasia and the law and
finally the lesson on palliative care. Why should the government have the right to say whether
someone can be put out of their misery if they have an incurable illness. If the patient has the right to
discontinue treatment why would he not have the right to shorten his lifetime to escape the
intolerable anguish. DeltaAlphaXray 2 years ago report 1 This is unfortunately not ?4.00 worth of
resources.
Empty reply does not make any sense for the end user Submit reply Cancel Report this resource to
let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. A family member who develops a terminal
condition goes through many hardships which are related to the illness he has, this is in relation to
fear of his or her life ending, pain and constant stress. There ended in being a court case over
whether or not it was right to remove artificial feeding, which would lead to his death. Euthanasia is
a rejection of the importance and value of human life. Our customer service team will review your
report and will be in touch. ?4.00 1.00 1 review BUY NOW Save for later ?4.00 1.00 1 review BUY
NOW Save for later Last updated 22 October 2016 Share this Share through email Share through
twitter Share through linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest The RS and P4C
Specialist 2.97 40 reviews Not the right resource. Chemotherapy treatment has been known to be
effective in some cases around the world. However, Euthanasia is legal in other countries such as the
Netherlands and Sweden. They argue that it should be on offer as one option among many, along
with the kind of care of patients with a terminal illness is offered by hospitals and hospices.
However, most doctors have never had a course in pain management so they're unaware of what to
do. Ethical Issues Involved In The Legislation of Euthanasia? She had to cope with depression
throughout her life. These questions can be answered by Christianity and Islam. During this course
of the suffocation, left an irreparable injury to her body and ultimately leaving her paralyzed for the
rest of her life. If the provision provides for right to a dignified life, then it. We’ll dig into the
particulars of each farther down in the article. The law only allows people with serious and incurable
illnesses to be eligible, and the public healthcare system will cover it. Therefore it is possible that
legalisation of voluntary euthanasia would effect the culture in which that approach to care has been
developed. It’s performed by a doctor or another individual, and it may be active (committing an act
that leads to death, such as administering a lethal dose of painkillers) or passive (not committing an
act that could prolong life, such as providing life support). Euthanasia is the practice of ending the
life of a person either by lethal injection or the suspension of medical treatment. They say that human
beings should be able to maintain their dignity up until the end of their lives. If a patient who is
under a doctor's care is in excruciating pain, there's definitely a need to find a different doctor.
Euthanasia involves one person being instrumental in the death of another. The last paragraph then
summarizes the main reasons for legalizing euthanasia. Courts in Australia, Canada, the UK and the
USA have all made it clear that there is no legal duty to continue medical treatment that is futile.
While oppressing voluntary euthanasia, people have developed caring and sensitive environments for
the terminally ill within the hospice movement. Euthanasia is a term that was first applied in the 17th
century, and the term was used to refer to a quick and painless death. Generally, Jewish thinkers
oppose voluntary euthanasia, often. Most religions disapprove of euthanasia for a number of reasons.
In the health care world, few topics create a debate as heated as euthanasia. Medical end-of-life
decision-making is a crucial part of end-of-life care.
The biggest argument in favor of euthanasia is that the person involved is in great pain. How do we
care for the terminally ill who is in a lot of pain. In this case, failing to heed request by a terminally
ill individual to terminate his or her life in order to prevent further unnecessary anguish is tantamount
to cruelty and inhumanity (Thomasma, 1996, 62). DeltaAlphaXray 2 years ago report 1 This is
unfortunately not ?4.00 worth of resources. Therefore it is possible that legalisation of voluntary
euthanasia would effect the culture in which that approach to care has been developed. They
murdered about 100,000 people who were physically or mentally handicapped. Euthanasia is not a
solution for respectable death, but a threat to life and society. Two decades of research on euthanasia
from the Netherlands. There are many doctors who are ready to risk a severe penalty in order to
assist patients in their wish to pass away, and the legalisation of euthanasia can both protect. That’s
the case of Paivi Rasanen, a Finnish medical doctor, active parliamentarian, former Minister of the
Interior, mother, a Bishop Alvarez of Nicaragua was sentenced to 26 years in prison for
“undermining national integrity” and “propagation of false news” for preaching on themes of God-
given human dignity and justice, in which he denounced the human rights violations perpetrated by
the Nicaraguan government against the Catholic Church, and the Nicaraguan people. It’s performed
by a doctor or another individual, and it may be active (committing an act that leads to death, such
as administering a lethal dose of painkillers) or passive (not committing an act that could prolong
life, such as providing life support). In Japan, where the dominant religion is Shinto, 69% of the
religious. However, Glover (1977) says that this argument is unconvincing and thus rejects it, whilst
Helga Kuhse (1991) has observed that this has not happened in the Netherlands, where voluntary
euthanasia is legal. The secular views are that the decision of mercy killing affects and rests mostly
on their kith and kin. By and large, however, the ethic adopted in society reflects a societal
consensus, what most people either believe to be right and wrong or are willing to accept upon
reflection. The golden rule argument is also one of the most prominent ideas presented by
proponents of euthanasia. Doctors could never be 100% certain of the patient’s motives as it’s very
easy to lie. Non-voluntary euthanasia is conducted where patients are not in the capacity to request
premature death themselves. Outline whether you think the law on Euthanasia should be changed in
the UK. It is an opportunity to end needless suffering, one that we already offer to animals, thus
should be offered to humans. Our customer service team will review your report and will be in
touch. ?4.00 1.00 1 review BUY NOW Save for later ?4.00 1.00 1 review BUY NOW Save for later
Last updated 22 October 2016 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share through
linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest The RS and P4C Specialist 2.97 40 reviews
Not the right resource. Christian Perspectives on euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicides.
Legalising of euthanasia in Australia would benefit terminally ill patients in allowing them to end
their lives when they have welcomed their passing. Therefore, authorizing the sick individual to end
his or her life is an act of mercy. Involuntary euthanasia is carried out without they patients consent,
usually when the person is in vegetative state. It is possible to keep alive more and more physically
disabled babies. Nearly all pain can be eliminated and, in those rare cases where it can't be
eliminated, it can still be reduced significantly if proper treatment is provided. Conclusion The issue
of dignity and comfort to a patient during death remains one of the most compelling reasons for
legalizing euthanasia, especially among the terminally ill patients. When Sir Thomas Moore, the
literary genius published his work Utopia- he wrote about Euthanasia being possible for people who
were suffering from terminal illness in his ideal community.
That’s primary’. We have autonomy over our bodies in matters of life, and it should be the same in
matters of death. Laws against euthanasia and are in place to prevent abuse and to protect people
from unscrupulous doctors and others. Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel
It's good to leave some feedback. The government should not have the right to give one group of
people (e.g. doctors) the power to kill another group of people (e.g. their patients). Take into account
how well one really knows his or her doctor. It is also meant as a way of ensuring that cancerous cells
do not spread to other parts of the body. None should be even partly responsible for the erosion of
that trust. Physician-assisted suicide, when it’s specified as such, means that a doctor must either
inject the dose, be present during the procedure, or be hands-on with the process in a key way.
Name Professor Course Date Why The World Should Embrace Euthanasia. Therefore, if another
person is willing to terminate the life of a suffering person, then the patient is obliged by the rule to
let another suffering individual to choose euthanasia too. There are many doctors who are ready to
risk a severe penalty in order to assist patients in their wish to pass away, and the legalisation of
euthanasia can both protect. Hence, if appropriate care and environment is provided to such patient,
he or she could have a painless and dignified natural death (Care, 2010). This argument is founded
on the premise of humanity and humane treatment of the sick. She believes in providing genuine,
honest information that helps people achieve their goals. It would also prove to be placing huge
amounts of social pressure on the most vulnerable people in the society. Empty reply does not make
any sense for the end user Submit reply Cancel Report this resource to let us know if it violates our
terms and conditions. She and her husband asked the courts to give immunity from prosecution to
her husband if he were to help her to kill herself. Ironically, it was the actions of two radical
euthanasia zealots—Dr. As a result, many physicians have participated in decisions and actions to
end life-sustaining treatment, giving them a sense of control over the timing and manner of a
patient's death. It is argued on a yearly basis as to whether euthanasia should be legalised in the
United Kingdom. Isn’t the pain of waiting for death frightening and traumatic. Critics of this are
concerned that the example of actively killing a baby or withdrawing treatment to bring about death
develops a culture in which all disabled people are considered to be of less value and thus dispute as
to whether or not this should be legal. With there being instances where doctors are convinced a
person will never wake up from a coma, or has no capacity for normal function, and yet can be kept
alive, there is the question over whether it shows much or less respect for the value of a person to
withdraw life saving measures and thus whether or not this should be legal. Experts think the
Victorian model may become a template for other Australian states if the introduction is seen as
successful. Start with the introduction to euthanasia lesson, followed by euthanasia and the law and
finally the lesson on palliative care. There is no medical assurance to finalize that Aruna would
reform to her formal state and the patients quality of life is been questioned. It would be inhuman
and unfair to make them endure the unbearable pain. As her state is more or less vegetative her
family has stopped visiting her. The secular views are that the decision of mercy killing affects and
rests mostly on their kith and kin. It could also be possible that they may fear a future which will not
be realised. In case of individuals suffering from incurable diseases or in conditions where effective
treatment wouldn’t affect their quality of life; they should be given the liberty to choose induced
death. In 2002, an initial law allowing euthanasia for adults and emancipated minors went into effect.

You might also like