Professional Documents
Culture Documents
and is officially published and distributed by the Ateneo Law School. Any
unauthorized reprint or use of this material is prohibited. No part of this work may
be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or
mechanical, including but not limited to photocopying, recording, or by any
information storage or retrieval system without the express written consent of
both the Ateneo Law School and the Ateneo Central Bar Operations 2023.
Furthermore, this material is confidential and shall be kept within those who
received a copy directly from the Ateneo Law School and the Ateneo Central Bar
Operations 2023. By downloading, acquiring possession, and/or using this
material, whether, by electronic or other means, the recipients agree to protect
the confidentiality of the material, refraining from any action which may lead to
possession, duplication, or use by third parties.
A T E ATENEO
N E O LLAW
A WSCHOOL
SCHOOL
Jarel Simon K. Uy
Andre Lloyd B. Arellano
Arianne Angelique D. Tolentino
Academic Understudies
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS………………………………………………………………………………………11
A. PARTNERHSIPS ............................................................................................................................... 13
1. General Provisions .......................................................................................................................... 13
2. Rights And Obligations Of The Partnership And Partners ................................................................. 19
3. Dissolution And Winding Up ............................................................................................................ 27
4. Limited Partnership ......................................................................................................................... 30
B. CORPORATIONS .............................................................................................................................. 34
1. Definition Of Corporation ................................................................................................................. 34
2. Classes Of Corporations.................................................................................................................. 35
3. Nationality Of Corporations .............................................................................................................. 37
4. Corporate Juridical Entity................................................................................................................. 39
5. Capital Structure ............................................................................................................................. 46
6. Incorporation And Organization ....................................................................................................... 49
7. Corporate Powers ........................................................................................................................... 56
8. Stockholders And Members ............................................................................................................. 61
9. Board Of Directors And Trustees ..................................................................................................... 72
10. Capital Affairs ................................................................................................................................ 80
11. Dissolution And Liquidation ............................................................................................................ 88
12. Other Corporations ........................................................................................................................ 92
13. Merger And Consolidation ........................................................................................................... 107
II. BANKING……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..112
A. THE NEW CENTRAL BANK ACT .................................................................................................... 113
1. State Policies ................................................................................................................................ 113
2. Monetary Board, Powers And Functions ........................................................................................ 113
3. The Bangko Sentral Ng Pilipinas And Banks In Distress................................................................. 115
B. GENERAL BANKING LAW OF 2000 ............................................................................................... 118
1. Definition And Classification Of Banks ........................................................................................... 118
2. Distinction Of Banks From Quasi-Banks And Trust Entities ............................................................ 120
3. Nature Of Bank Funds And Bank Deposits .................................................................................... 121
4. Diligence Required Of Banks In View Of Fiduciary Nature Of Banking............................................ 121
5. Prohibited Transactions By Bank Directors And Officers ................................................................ 122
6. Stipulation On Interests ................................................................................................................. 123
C. SECRECY OF BANK DEPOSITS .................................................................................................... 124
1. Purpose ........................................................................................................................................ 124
2. Prohibited Acts .............................................................................................................................. 124
3. Deposits Covered .......................................................................................................................... 124
4. Exceptions From Coverage ........................................................................................................... 125
5. Garnishment Of Deposits, Including Foreign Deposits.................................................................... 127
III. INSURANCE…………………………………………………………………………………………………………135
A. BASIC CONCEPTS OF INSURANCE .............................................................................................. 136
1. Elements Of An Insurance Contract ............................................................................................... 136
2. Characteristics/ Nature Of Insurance Contracts.............................................................................. 137
3. Classes Of Insurance Contracts .................................................................................................... 139
4. Insurable Interest .......................................................................................................................... 148
5. Double Insurance And Overinsurance............................................................................................ 151
6. No Fault, Suicide, And Incontestability Clause ............................................................................... 152
B. PERFECTION OF THE INSURANCE CONTRACT........................................................................... 157
C. RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF PARTIES .................................................................................... 162
1. Insurer .......................................................................................................................................... 162
2. Insured.......................................................................................................................................... 162
3. Beneficiary .................................................................................................................................... 163
4. Agent Or Trustee ........................................................................................................................... 164
5. Partner Or Co-Owner .................................................................................................................... 164
6. Assignee ....................................................................................................................................... 164
7. Mortgagor And Mortgagee ............................................................................................................. 164
D. RESCISSION OF INSURANCE CONTRACTS ................................................................................. 166
1. Overview Of General Grounds....................................................................................................... 166
2. Concealment ................................................................................................................................. 166
3. Misrepresentations or Omissions ................................................................................................... 168
4. Breach Of Warranties .................................................................................................................... 169
5. Exercise Of The Right To Rescind Or Cancel ................................................................................ 170
6. Cancellation Of Non-Life Insurance ............................................................................................... 171
(Exh. “A”), which shows that both parties considered personality, and shall be governed by the provisions
themselves as lessor-lessee under a contract of relating to co-ownership. (1669)
lease. Yulo v. Yang ChiaoSeng, 106 Phil. 111
(1959). Note:The phrase “kept secret among the members”
When family members lease out to SHELL a family according to Manresa does not mean that articles
lot for the establishment of a gasoline station, and are known to all members but withheld from third
invested the advanced rentals and deposits to allow persons. It contemplates a situation where the
one of their members to use the amounts as the articles, which allow any one of the members to
registered dealer of SHELL under its of “one station, contract in his own name with third persons are
one dealer” policy, and that the registered dealer known to some members only and kept secret from
had accounted for the operations to the other the rest. In short, the secrecy is directed to some of
members of the family, there was a partnership the partners. The reason for this article is to
formed, for which the registered dealer can be preserve equality among partners and to prevent
compelled to execute the covering articles of fraud.
partnership, for accounting and distribution of the
shares in profits of the other partners. Estanislao,
Jr. v. Court of Appeals, 160 SCRA 830 (1988). Effects of an Unlawful Partnership (i.e.,
established for an unlawful object or purpose)
There was likewise no agreement for the sharing of 1. Void ab initio such that it never existed in the
profits, only that Merian expects to receive eyes of the law (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1409[1])
remittance of monthly interest from the amount she 2. Profits shall be confiscated in favor of the
invested. At any rate, the receipt by a person of a government (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1770)
share of the profits, or of a payment of a contingent 3. Instruments or tools and proceeds of the crime
amount in case of profits earned, is not conclusive shall also be forfeited in favor of the government
evidence of partnership. Article 1769(3) of the Civil (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1770; REVISED PENAL CODE,
Code provides that “the sharing of gross returns Art. 45)
does not of itself establish a partnership, whether or 4. The contributions of the partners shall not be
not the persons sharing them have a joint or confiscated unless they fall under No. 3 (of this
common right or interest in any property from which enumeration) (CIVIL CODE, Arts. 1411 and 1412)
the returns are derived.” There must be an
unmistakable intention to form a partnership which Judicial decree is not necessary to dissolve an
is lacking in this case. Most importantly, the facts do unlawful partnership. (De Leon, 2019)
not disclose that there is mutual agency between
Merian and Edna, that is, neither party alleged that That there is no legally constituted partnership does
she can bind by her acts the other, and can be not mean that there are no contractual or legal
bound by the acts of the other in the ordinary course relations among the parties.
of business. Santiago v. Spouses Garcia, 934
SCRA 641 (2020). Effect of Partial Illegality
Where a part of the business of a partnership is legal
Although the Olivas were mere creditors, not and a part illegal, an account of that which is legal
partners, the Antons agreed to compensate them for may be had.
the risks they had taken. The Olivas gave the loans
with no security and they were to be paid such loans Where, without the knowledge or participation of the
only if the stores made profits. Had the business partners, the firm's profits in a lawful business have
suffered loses and could not pay what it owed, the been increased by wrongful acts, the innocent
Olivas would have ultimately assumed those loses partners are not precluded as against the guilty
just by themselves. Still there was nothing illegal or partners from recovering their share of the profits.
immoral about this scheme. Anton v. Oliva, 647 (De Leon, 2010)
SCRA 506 (2011).
Formation of Partnership
a. When is a Partnership Formed
Where there are articles “kept secret among the Article 1784. A partnership begins from the
members”, this produces only a co-ownership: moment of the execution of the contract, unless
it is otherwise stipulated. (1679)
Article 1775. Associations and societies, whose
articles are kept secret among the members, and
wherein any one of the membersmay contract in his b. How Partnership is Formed
own name with third persons, shall have no juridical General Rule: A partnership may be
constituted in any form, except where
Persons acting as partners are presumed by law to (i) Partnership with Fixed Term- there is a period
have entered into a contract of partnership. In this of time stated in the agreement during which the
case, the burden of proof is shifted to the party partnership will exist.
denying its existence. (Rules of Court, Rule 131,
Sec. 3 (z)) (ii) Partnership for a Particular Undertaking–
formed to engage in a specific undertaking without
An extant partnership is presumed to exist until specification of the term but owing to the nature of
proven terminated by the person asserting its its purpose with the implied understanding that it
termination. (Rules of Court, Rule 131, Sec. 3 (ee)) shall last only and until the completion of the
undertaking.
The best evidence of the existence of a partnership
would have been the article of partnership itself, but (iii) Partnership at Will– designed to continue for
here there is none. The alleged partnership, though, no fixed period of time and is formed to last only
was never formally organized. The net effect is that during the mutual consent or pleasure of the parties,
we are asked to determine whether a partnership its existence being terminable at the will of any one
existed based purely on circumstantial evidence. or more of them.
Here the evidence adduced fall short of the quantum
of proof required to establish a partnership. Besides, Common Types of Partnership:
it is indeed odd, if not unnatural, that despite the 1. Universal v. Particular Partnership
forty years the partnership was allegedly in
existence, Tan EngKee never asked for an There are two kinds of universal partnerships (CIVIL
accounting,since the essence of a partnership is CODE, Art. 1777) as follows:
that the partners share in the profits and losses,
where each partner has a right to demand an Universal Partnership of All Present Property
accounting for as long as the partnership exists. A (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1778)
demand for periodic accounting is evidence of a A partnership of all present property is that in which
partnership. (Heirs of Tan EngKee v. Court of the partners contribute all the property which
Appeals, 341 SCRA 740 (2000)). actually belongs to them to a common fund, with the
intention of dividing the same among themselves, as
Failure to prepare an inventory of the immovable well as all the profits which they may acquire
property is contributed, in spite of Art. 1773 therewith
declaring the partnership void, would not render the
partnership void when: Comprises the following (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1779):
(a) No third-party is involved since Art. 1773 was a. Property which belonged to each of the
intended for the protection of third parties; and partners at the time of the constitution of the
(b) the partners have made a claim on the partnership
partnership agreement which is deemed binding b. Profits which they may acquire from all
between them as any other contract. (Torres v. CA, property contributed
320 SCRA 428 (1999)). c. A stipulation for the common enjoyment of
any other profits may also be made
But: the property which the partners may acquire (6) Individuals, associations and corporations not
subsequently by inheritance, legacy, or donation permitted by law to inherit. (745, 752, 753, 754a)
cannot be included in such stipulation, except the
Particular Partnership (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1783) A
fruits thereof
particular partnership has for its objects:
a. Determinate things
Universal Partnership of Profits
b. Their use or fruits
Comprises all that the partners may acquire by their
c. Specific undertaking
industry or work during the existence of the
partnership (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1780). d. Exercise of profession or vocation
When a person has been thus represented to be a such representation with the consequence
partner in an existing partnership, or with one or of binding them as though he was a partner
more persons not actual partners, he is an agent of in fact with respect the persons who rely on
the persons consenting to such representation to such representation.
bind them to the same extent and in the same
manner as though he were a partner in fact, with 8) Consequence of consent of others to the
respect to persons who rely upon the person making the representation:
representation. When all the members of the • In the case where all the members
existing partnership consent to the representation, a of an existing partnership consent
partnership act or obligation results; but in all other to the representation, a
cases it is the joint act or obligation of the person partnership act/obligation results.
acting and the persons consenting to the
• In all other cases, it is the joint
representation. (n)
obligation of the person acting and
When reviewing the above article take note of the the persons consenting to the
following: representation.
1) What actions gives rise to the estoppel:
• A person by words spoke or g. Rules of Partnership Applies to
written or conduct Joint Ventures
• Represents himself or
• Consents to another representing A joint venture, therefore, is akin to a partnership,
himself. the essential elements of which are as follows: (1)
2) What is the representation made? an agreement to contribute money, property, or
• That he is a partner in an existing industry to a common fund; and (2) an intent to
partnership, or divide the profits among the contracting parties. In
this case there is no joint venture arrangement. A
• That he is a partner with one or perusal of the Assignment of Rights and the
more persons who are not actual
February 21, 1990 letter agreement clearly shows
partners
that the Valdeses' share in the sale of the
3) Liability arises if the person to whom the subdivision lots was the manner of paying, or mode
representation was made: of payment of the P20 Million consideration for the
• Have given credit to the actual or 4,000 BARECO shares. While we understand that
apparent partnership this type of provision may be peculiar to a contract
of sale, this profit-sharing scheme, as explained by
4) There is an effect if the representation or LCDC, was a means for the latter to acquire the
the consent to the representation has been necessary funds to develop and improve the said
made in a PUBLIC MANNER, in which case lots.Notably, LCDC was contractually obliged to
liability will arise to a person: remit to the Valdeses' their 40% share in the sale of
the Montemar Villas lots despite the fact that LCDC
• Regardless of whether that may be experiencing losses. This runs counter to a
representation has been partnership or joint venture relationship. The
communicated to such person essence of a true partnership is that the partners
5) If a partnership liability results, the person share in the profits and losses of the business. This
making the representation or consenting to is clearly not the case here. Valdes v. La Colina Dev.
it being made is liable as if his an actual Corp., G.R. No. 208140, 12July 2021.
partner of the existing partnership.
Generally understood to mean an organization
6) If there is no partnership liability, the person formed for some temporary purpose, a joint venture
making the representation or consenting to is likened to a particular partnership or one which
it bing made he is liable pro rata with other “has for its object determinate things, their use or
persons who have consented to the fruits, or a specific undertaking, or the exercise of a
contract or representation, otherwise he is profession or vocation. (Realubit v. Jaso, G.R. No.
separately liablie. 178782)
7) The person representing to be a partner of Joint Venture
an existing partnership, with one or more
JV is governed by Law on Partnerships. Here, the
persons who are not actual partners (if any)
JVA parties agreed on a 50-50 ratio on the proceeds
is an AGENT of the persons consenting to of the project, although they did not provide for the
splitting of losses, which therefore puts into principle of relativity as above-mentioned. In fact,
application Art. 1797: the same ratio applies in under the express terms of the JVA, the developer
splitting the obligation-loss of the joint venture. had even stipulated to hold landowners free from
There being a JVA, not allowing MarsmanDrysdale any liability to third parties for non-compliance with
to recover from Gotesco what it paid to PGI would HLURB rules and regulations. As things stand, only
not only be contrary to the law on partnership on developer should be held liable for its obligations to
division of losses but would partake of a clear case Buenviaje under the subject CTS. Buenviaje v.
of unjust enrichment at Gotesco’s expense. Spouses Salonga,805 SCRA 369 (2016).
(Marsman Drysdale Land, Inc. v. Philippine
Geoanalytics, G.R. No. 183374) 622 SCRA 281 Joint venture between Mabuhay, IDHI and
(2010). Sembcorp was pursued under the JV Corporations,
WJSC and WJNA. By choosing to adopt a corporate
Although parties executed a “Power of Attorney” and entity as the medium to pursue the joint venture
referred to themselves as “Principal” and “Manager”, enterprise, the parties are bound by Corporate Law
a JVA was indeed intended by the parties. Perusal principles, among which is the limited liability
of the agreement indicates that the parties had doctrine. The use of a joint venture allows the co-
intended to create a partnership and establish a venturer to take full advantage of the limited liability
common fund for the purpose. They also had a joint feature of the corporate vehicle which is not present
interest in the profits of the business as shown by a in a formal partnership arrangement. Mabuhay
50-50 sharing in the income of the mine. While a Holdings Corp. v. Sembcorp Logistics Ltd., 888
corporation, like petitioner, cannot generally enter SCRA 364 (2018).
into a contract of partnership unless authorized by
law or its charter, it has been held that it may enter Note: Section 35(h) of the Revised Corporation
into a joint venture which is akin to a particular Code provides that among the powers of a
partnership relationship. corporation it has the power to “ To enter into a
partnership, joint venture, merger, consolidation, or
any other commercial agreement with natural and
The fact that the instrument does not clearly provide juridical persons.”
for an option, and not an obligation, on the part of
one of the co-venturers to make contributions into h. Professional Partnership
the business enterprise, will not detract from the
legal fact that they constituted a partnership General professional partnership
between themselves: “The wording of the parties’ Two or more persons may also form a partnership
agreement as to petitioner’s contribution to the for the exercise of a profession (CIVIL CODE, Art.
common fund does not detract from the fact that 1767 [2]). A particular partnership includes one that
petitioner transferred its funds and property to the is formed for the exercise of a profession or a
project as specified in paragraph 5, thus rendering vocation. (Civil Code Art. 1783). The term “general
effective the other stipulations of the contract, professional partnership” is found in the National
particularly paragraph 5(c) which prohibits petitioner Internal Revenue Code where section 22(b)
from withdrawing the advances until termination of excludes such partnerships from the coverage of
the parties’ business relations. As can be seen, corporate income tax.
petitioner became bound by its contributions once
the transfers were made. The contributions acquired i. Management
an obligatory nature as soon as petitioner had
chosen to exercise the option.” Philex Mining Corp. POWERS OF THE PARTNER/S APPOINTED
v. CIR, 551 SCRA 428 (2008). AS MANAGER
Partner is Power of Vote of
appointed managing partners
While developer and landowners entered into a joint manager in partner is representing
venture, which is a form of partnership, the fact the Articles irrevocable controlling
remains that their joint venture was never privy to of without interest is
any obligation with Buenviaje. It must be pointed out partnership just/lawful necessary to
that the JVA was limited to the construction of the (CIVIL CODE, cause; revoke power
residential units under the Brentwoods Project, and Art. 1800) Revocable (CIVIL CODE,
thereafter the distribution of specified units between only when in Art. 1800)
the co-ventures; and that Jebson had the sole hand bad faith
in marketing the units allocated to it to third persons, (CIVIL CODE,
such as Buenviaje.Hence, liability cannot be Art. 1800)
imputed against the joint venture based on the same
Upon dissolution of the partnership, the partners appraisal must be made in the manner prescribed in
shall contribute the amounts necessary to satisfy the the contract of partnership, and in the absence of
partnership liabilities. (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1839(4), (7)) stipulation, it shall be made by experts chosen by
the partners, and according to current prices, the
Article 1816 provides: First, partners’ obligation to subsequent changes thereof being for account of
partnership liabilities is subsidiary in nature—they the partnership. (Civil Code Art. 1787)
shall only be liable with their property after all
partnership assets have been exhausted. Resort to Who bears the risk for specific and determinate
properties of a partner may be made only after things contributed:
efforts in exhausting partnership assets have failed • Where the Partner bears the risk: If these
or that such partnership assets are insufficient to are not fungible, contributed to the
cover the entire obligation. Second, that partners’ partnership so that only their use and fruits
obligation to third persons with respect to may be for the common benefit, shall be
partnership liability is pro rata or joint, i.e., liable only borne by the partner who owns them. (Civil
for the payment of only a proportionate part of the Code Art. 1795, 1st par.)
debt. Joint liability of partners is a defense that can • Where the Partnership bears the risk (Civil
be raised by a partner impleaded in a complaint Code Art. 1795 2nd par.):
against partnership. Guy v. Gacott, 780 SCRA 579 o If the things contributed are fungible,
(2016). or cannot be kept without
deteriorating, or
b. Obligations Of Partners Among o if they were contributed to be sold,
Themselves • In the absence of stipulation, the risk of the
things brought and appraised in the
Obligation to Contribute to the Common Fund inventory, and in such case the claim shall be
What May Be Contributed limited to the value at which they were
Contribution must be in equal shares unless appraised.
otherwise stipulated. (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1790) In
general, every partner is a debtor of the partnership c. Industry
for whatever he may have promised to contribute
thereto. (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1786,par. 1) An industrial partner is one who contributes his
industry, labor, or services to the partnership. He is
a. Money considered the owner of his services, which is
contribution to the common fund. (Limuco v. Calina,
A partner who has undertaken to contribute a sum [C.A.] No. 10099-R)
of money and fails to do so becomes a debtor for the
interest and damages from the time he should have When Immovables or Real Rights Contributed
complied with his obligation.(CIVIL CODE, Art. 1788, If immovables are not contributed, even if the capital
Par. 1) is at least PhP3,000, failure to comply with the
requirement of appearance in public instrument and
b. Property SEC Registration will not affect the liability of the
partnership and the members thereof to third
Bound for warranty against eviction persons. (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1772, [2])
A partner is bound for warranty in case of eviction
with regard to specific and determinate things which When immovable property are contributed, (1) the
he may have contributed to the partnership, in the Articles of Partnership must appear in a public
same cases and in the same manner as the vendor instrument, and (2) there must be an inventory of the
is bound with respect to the vendee. (Civil Code Art. property contributed signed by the parties and
1786, 2nd par.) attached to the public instrument. (CIVIL CODE,
Arts.1771 and 1773)
Liable for Fruits
A partner shall also be liable for the fruits of a Failure to prepare an inventory of the immovable
specific and determinate from the time they should property contributed shall render the partnership
have been delivered, without the need of any void pursuant to Art. 1773 except when:
demand. (Civil Code Art. 1786, 2nd par.) a. No third party is involved (since Art. 1773
was intended to protect 3rd persons);
When goods are contributed b. Partners themselves have made a claim
When the capital or a part thereof which a partner is based on the partnership agreement.
bound to contribute consists of goods, their (Torres v. CA, G.R. No. 134559)
Consequence of Failure to Contribute Partners must contribute equal shares to the capital
Each partner has the obligation: of the partnership unless there is stipulation to
a. To contribute at the beginning of the contrary. (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1790)
partnership or at the stipulated time the
money, property or industry which he may Capitalist partners must contribute additional capital
have promised to contribute. (CIVIL CODE, in case of imminent loss to the business of the
Art. 1786) partnership and there is no agreement to the
b. To answer for eviction in case the contrary; refusal to do so shall create an obligation
partnership is deprived of the determinate on his part to sell his interest to the other partners.
property contributed (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1786) (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1791)
c. To answer to the partnership for the fruits
of the property the contribution of which he Requisites before a capitalist partner may be
delayed, from the date they should have obliged to sell his interest to the others:
been contributed up to the time of actual a. There is an imminent loss of the business
delivery (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1786) of the partnership
d. To preserve said property with the diligence b. The majority of the capitalist partners are of
of a good father of a family pending delivery the opinion that an additional contribution to
to partnership (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1163) the common fund would save the business
e. To indemnify partnership for any damage c. The capitalist partner refuses deliberately
caused to it by the retention of the same or to contribute (not due to financial inability)
by the delay in its contribution (CIVIL CODE, d. There is no agreement that even in case of
Arts.1788, 1170) an imminent loss of the business the
partners are not obliged to contribute. (De
In the event that there is a failure to contribute Leon, 2019)
property promised:
a. Partners become ipso jure a debtor of the The industrial partner is exempted from the
partnership even in the absence of any requirement to contribute an additional share.
demand (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1169[1]) (CIVIL CODE, Art.1791)
b. Remedy of the other partner is not
rescission but specific performance with Fiduciary Duty
damages from defaulting partner (CIVIL A partnership is a fiduciary relation—one entered
CODE, Art. 1788) into and to be maintained on the basis of trust and
confidence. With that, a partner must observe the
The partner shall be liable as a debtor of the utmost good faith, fairness, and integrity in his
partnership in two instances: dealings with the others:
a. when he fails to contribute money, on the a. He cannot directly or indirectly use
date he undertook to do so; partnership assets for his own benefit;
b. when he converts partnership funds for his (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1807)
own use, on the date he does so. b. He cannot carry on a business of the
partnership for his private advantage;
In both instances, the partner becomes a (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1807)
partnership debtor and is liable for interest and c. He cannot, in conducting the business of
damages. (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1788) the partnership, take any profit
clandestinely; (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1807)
A partner who promises to contribute to partnership d. He cannot obtain for himself that which he
becomes a promissory debtor of the partnership, should have obtained for the partnership
including liability for interests and damages caused (e.g., business opportunity) (CIVIL CODE,
for failure to pay, and which amounts may be Art. 1789, Art. 1808)
deducted upon dissolution of the partnership from e. He cannot carry on another business in
his share in the profits and net assets. (Rojas v. competition with the partnership; and
Maglana, G.R. No. 30616) (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1808)
f. He cannot avail himself of knowledge or
c. Obligations with respect to information, which may be properly
Contribution to Partnership regarded as the property of the partnership.
Capital (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1807)
g. Every partner is responsible to the
partnership for damages suffered by it
through his fault, and he cannot
compensate them with the profits and ii. If he received it for the account of
benefits which he may have earned for the partnership, the whole sum shall be applied
partnership by his industry. However, the to partnership credit.(CIVIL CODE,Art. 1792
courts may equitably lessen this 1st par.)
responsibility if through the partner's
extraordinary efforts in other activities of the However, if the personal credit of the partner is more
partnership, unusual profits have been onerous to the debtor, the debtor may exercise his
realized. (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1794) right under Article 1252 to declare at the time of
making the payment, to which of them the same
A. Prohibition to Engage in Competitive must be applied provided that the debt to which the
Business payment is applied is due. (CIVIL CODE,Art.: 1792 2nd
par. & Art. 1252)
1. If an industrial partner engages in any business
without the consent of the partnership: C. Partner who Receives Share of Partnership
i. He can be excluded from the partnership; Credit
or
ii. The capitalist partners can avail of the Obligation of partner who receives share of
benefit he obtained from the business. partnership credit from a debtor who becomes
insolvent: Bring to the partnership capital what he
Note: The capitalist partners have the right to file an has received even though he may have given
action for damages against the industrial partner in receipt for his share only (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1793)
either case. (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1789)
Requisites:
An industrial partner is not deemed to have violated 1. A partner has received, in whole or in part, his
his fiduciary duties to the other partners by having share of the partnership credit
delivered on the particular service required of her 2. The other partners have not collected their
and devoting her time serving in the judiciary which shares
is not considered to be engaged in an activity for 3. The partnership debtor has become insolvent
profit. Evangelista & Co. v. Abad Santos, 51 SCRA
416 (1973)
Rules for Distribution of Profits and Losses
2. Unless there is a stipulation to the contrary, if (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1797)
the capitalist partner engages for his own
account in any operation which is the kind of There are three situations provided under Article
business of the partnership 1797 of the Civil Code:
i. He shall be required to bring to the common 1. When the partners agree on how to
fund the profits he derived from the distribute profits and losses.
competing business; and
ii. He shall personally bear the losses. (CIVIL Consequence: The distribution of profits and losses
CODE, Art. 1808) will be in conformity with such agreement bearing in
mind that any agreement excluding any partner from
When a partner engages in a separate business any share in either profit or losses is prohibited
enterprise that is competitive with that of the under Art. 1799 of the Civil Code.
partnership, the other partner’s withdrawal becomes
thereby justified and for which the latter cannot be 2. When partners agree only on the profits.
held for damages. (Rojas v. Maglana, G.R. No
30616) Consequence: The share of each of each partner
in the losses shall be in the same proportion as the
B. Managing Partner who Collects Debt from profit
Third Party
3. In the absence of any stipulation:
Obligation of a partner authorized to manage the
partnership who collects debt from person who Consequence: The share of the capitalist partner in
owed him and the partnership: the profits and losses shall be in proportion to what
i. Apply sum collected to the two credits (i.e., he may have contributed.
amount owed to the managing partner in his
personal capacity and amount owed to the Article 1797 also provides a special rule for
partnership) in proportion to their amounts. industrial partners as follows:
(a) Industrial partners are not liable for losses.
Rules on resolving disputes on the sharing of The right to choose with whom to associate himself
profits and losses: is the very foundation and essence of the
If the partners have agreed to intrust to a third partnership. Its continued existence is, in turn,
person the designation of the share of each one in dependent on the constancy of that mutual resolve,
the profits and losses: along with each partner’s capability to give it, and
(a) such designation may be impugned only when the absence of a cause for dissolution provided by
it is manifestly inequitable. the law itself. Ortega v. Court of Appeals, 245 SCRA
(b) In no case may a partner who has begun to 529 (1995).
execute the decision of the third person, or
who has not impugned the same within a
period of three months from the time he had
knowledge thereof, complain of such decision.
3. Property Rights of a Partner ii) If right exists under the terms of any
a. The property rights of a partner are: agreement
i) His rights in specific partnership iii) As provided by Art. 1807
property; iv) Whenever other circumstances render
ii) His interest in the partnership; and it just and reasonable
iii) His right to participate in the c. Duty to render on demand true and full
management (CIVIL CODE,Art. 1810) information affecting partnership to any
partner or legal representative of any
b. Definition of a partner’s interest in the deceased partner or of any partner under
partnership: A partner's interest in the legal disability (CIVIL CODE,Art. 1806)
partnership is his share of the profits and d. Duty to account to the partnership as
surplus. (CIVIL CODE,Art. 1812) fiduciary (CIVIL CODE,Art. 1807)
Note the difference between the right to inspect and
c. A partner is co-owner with his partners of copy the partnership books (Art. 1805) demand a
specific partnership property. The incidents formal account (Art. 1809 and 1807) and the right to
of this co-ownership are such that: true and full information (Art. 1806).
i) A partner, subject to any agreement
between the partners, has an equal 5. Responsibility of Partnership to Partners
right with his partners to possess a. To refund the amounts disbursed by
specific partnership property for partner on behalf of the partnership plus
partnership purposes; but he has no corresponding interest from the time the
right to possess such property for any expenses are made (loans and advances
other purpose without the consent of made by a partner to the partnership aside
his partners; from capital contribution)
ii) A partner's right in specific partnership b. To answer for obligations partner may have
property is not assignable except in contracted in good faith in the interest of the
connection with the assignment of partnership business
rights of all the partners in the same To answer for risks in consequence of its
property; management(CIVIL CODE, Art. 1796)
iii) A partner's right in specific partnership
property is not subject to attachment or Other Rights and Obligations of Partners
execution, except on a claim against a. Right to associate another person with him
the partnership. When partnership in his share without consent of other
property is attached for a partnership partners (sub-partnership) (CIVIL CODE, Art.
debt the partners, or any of them, or the 1804)
representatives of a deceased partner, b. Right to inspect and copy partnership
cannot claim any right under the books at any reasonable hour (CIVIL CODE,
homestead or exemption laws; Art. 1805)
iv) A partner's right in specific partnership c. Right to a formal account as to partnership
property is not subject to legal support affairs (even during existence of
under article 291. partnership): (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1809)
(CIVIL CODE,Art. 1811) i. If he is wrongfully excluded from
partnership business or possession
4. Rights and Obligations of Partners with of its property by his copartners
respect to accounts and information ii. If right exists under the terms of any
a. Right to inspect and copy partnership agreement
books at any reasonable hour and such iii. As provided by Art. 1807
partnership books partnership books shall iv. Whenever other circumstances
be kept, subject to any agreement between render it just and reasonable
the partners, at the principal place of d. Duty to render on demand true and full
business of the partnership. (CIVIL information affecting partnership to any
CODE,Art. 1805) partner or legal representative of any
b. Right to a formal account as to partnership deceased partner or of any partner under
affairs (even during existence of legal disability (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1806)
partnership): (CIVIL CODE,Art. 1809) e. Duty to account to the partnership as
i) If he is wrongfully excluded from fiduciary (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1807)
partnership business or possession of
its property by his copartners
Responsibility of Partnership to Partners property of third persons. (CIVIL C ODE Arts. 1824,
a. To refund the amounts disbursed by 1822 & 1823)
partner on behalf of the partnership plus
corresponding interest from the time the Liability of incoming partner is limited to:
expenses are made (loans and advances 1. For partnership obligations arising before his
made by a partner to the partnership aside admission - his share in the partnership
from capital contribution) property
b. To answer for obligations partner may have 2. For partnership obligations arising upon his
contracted in good faith in the interest of the admission - his share in the partnership
partnership business property and his separate property (CIVIL CODE,
c. To answer for risks in consequence of its Art. 1826)
management (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1796)
Creditors of partnership preferred in partnership
d. Obligations Of Partnership Or property & may attach partner's share in partnership
Partners To Third Persons assets. (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1827)
Every partnership shall operate under a firm name. Remedy of Partner’s Separate Creditors (CIVIL
Persons who include their names in the partnership CODE, Art. 1814); the Charging Order:
name even if they are not members shall be liable
as a partner. (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1815) Without prejudice to the preferred rights of
partnership creditors under Article 1827, the
All partners shall be liable for contractual obligations competent court, upon application by a judgment
of the partnership with their property, after all creditor of a partner, , the court which entered the
partnership assets have been exhausted: judgment, or any other court, may:
1. Pro rata
2. Subsidiary (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1816) 1. Issue an order charging the interest of the
debtor partner with the payment of the
Admission or representation made by any partner unsatisfied amount of the judgment debt as
concerning partnership affairs within scope of his well as the interest
authority is evidence against the partnership. (CIVIL 2. Appoint a receiver of the debtor partner’s
CODE, Art. 1820) share of the profits and any other money
due or to fall due to him in respect of the
General rule: Notice to partner of any matter partnership
relating to partnership affairs operate as notice to 3. Make all other orders, directions, accounts,
partnership. (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1821) and inquiries which the debtor partner
might have made, or which the
Cases of Knowledge of a Partner circumstances of the case may require
The following operate as notice to or knowledge of 4. Direct the sale of the interest charged.
the partnership:
• Notice to any partner of any matter relatinf Redemption from a Charging Order:
to partnership affairs and, The interest charged may be redeemed at any time
before foreclosure, or in case of a sale being
• The knowledge of the partner acting in the
directed by the court, may be purchased without
particular matter then present to his mind
thereby causing a dissolution:
o Acquired while a partner or then
1. With separate property, by any one or more
present to his mind
of the partners; or
• Knowledge of any other partner who
2. With partnership property, by any one or
reasonably could and should have
more of the partners with the consent of all
communicated it to the acting partner (CIVIL
the partners whose interests are not so
CODE, Art.1821)
charged or sold.
Exception: Except in case of fraud on partnership
Power of Partner as an Agent of the Partnership
committed by or with the consent of that partner.
(Art. 1818)
(CIVIL CODE, Art. 1821)
ACTS EFFECT
Keep note that partners are solidarily liable with the Acts for carrying on in Every partner is an
with the partnership for wrongful acts or omissions the usual way the agent and may
in the course of business or with the authority of the business of the execute acts with
partners and for the misapplication of money or partnership binding effect
partnership may
Except: when he has recover.
no authority and 3rd
person has knowledge Partnership may
of lack of authority recover the property
Act which is not Does not bind unless:
apparently for the partnership unless
carrying of business in authorized by other the conveyance was
the usual way partners done in accordance
with the 1st par. of
Acts of strict dominion Art.1818, or
or ownership: theproperty has been
Assign partnership conveyed to a holder
property in trust for for value without
creditors knowledge that the
Dispose of good-will partner, in making the
of business conveyance, has
Do an act which would exceeded his
make it impossible to authority.
carry on ordinary Title in partnership Any partner may
business of name, Conveyance in convey title to such
partnership partner's name property by a
Confess a judgment conveyance executed
Enter into in the partnership
compromise name.
concerning a
partnership claim or Such conveyance
liability binds the partnership
Submit partnership if. If otherwise, the
claim or liability to partnership may
arbitration recover.
Renounce claim of
partnership Partnership may
Acts in contravention Partnership is not recover the property
of a restriction on liable to 3rd persons unless:
authority having actual or
presumptive The conveyance was
knowledge of the done in accordance
restrictions with the 1st par. of
Art.1818, or the
Admission or representation made by any partner property has been
concerning partnership affairs within scope of his conveyed to a holder
authority is evidence against the partnership. (CIVIL for value without
CODE, Art. 1820) knowledge that the
partner, in making the
Effects of Conveyance of Real Property conveyance, has
Belonging to Partnership (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1819) exceeded his
TITLE EFFECT authority.
Title in partnership Any partner may
name, Conveyance in convey title to such Title in name of 1 or The partners in whose
partnership name property by a more partners, name the title stands
conveyance executed Conveyance in name if may convey title to
in the partnership partner/partners in such property.
name. whose name title
stands Partnership may
Such conveyance recover the property
binds the partnership unless:
if. If otherwise, the
Grounds for dissolution by decree of court b. Transactions which would bind partnership
(CIVIL CODE, Art. 1831): if not dissolved, when the other party:
1. Partner declared insane in any judicial Situation 1
proceeding or shown to be of unsound mind (1) Had extended credit to partnership
2. Incapacity of partner to perform his part of the prior to dissolution; and
partnership contract (2) Had no knowledge/notice of
3. Partner guilty of conduct prejudicial to business dissolution
of partnership Situation 2
4. Willful or persistent breach of partnership (1) Did not extend credit to
agreement or conduct which makes it partnership;
reasonably impracticable to carry on (2) Had known partnership prior to
partnership with him dissolution; and
5. Business can only be carried on at a loss (3) Had no knowledge/notice of
6. Other circumstances which render dissolution dissolution/fact of dissolution not
equitable advertised in a newspaper of
7. Upon application by purchaser of partner's general circulation in the place
interest: where partnership is regularly
a. After termination of specified carried on
term/particular undertaking
b. Anytime if partnership at will when interest Post Dissolution (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1834)
was assigned/charging order issued Partner cannot bind the partnership anymore
after dissolution:
b. Effects Of Dissolution 1. Where dissolution is due to unlawfulness to
carry on with business (except: winding up of
Authority of Partner to Bind Partnership partnership affairs)
General rule: Authority of partners to bind 2. Where partner has become insolvent
partnership is terminated. (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1832) 3. Where partner unauthorized to wind up
partnership affairs, except by transaction with
Exceptions: one who:
1. To wind up partnership affairs
2. Complete transactions not finished (CIVIL CODE, Situation 1
Art. 1834) a. Had extended credit to partnership prior to
dissolution, and
b. Had no knowledge/notice of dissolution; or
Qualifications
1. With respect to Partners (CIVIL CODE, Art.
Situation 2
1833)
a. Did not extend credit to partnership prior to
Authority of partners to bind partnership by new
dissolution
contract is immediately terminated when
b. Had known partnership prior to dissolution
dissolution is not due to act, death, or
c. Had no knowledge/notice of dissolution/fact
insolvency (ADI) of a partner.
of dissolution not advertised in a
newspaper of general circulation in the
If due to ADI, partners are liable as if partnership not
place where partnership is regularly carried
dissolved, when the following concur:
on
a. If cause is act of partner, acting partner
must have knowledge of such dissolution;
and c. Rights Of Partners Upon
b. If cause is death or insolvency, acting Dissolution
partner must have knowledge/ notice.
General rule: Dissolution does not discharge
2. With respect to Persons not Partners (CIVIL existing liability of partner
CODE, Art. 1834)
Exceptions: Except by agreement between:
Partner continues to bind partnership even after 1. The partner himself,
dissolution in following cases: 2. The partnership creditors and
a. Transactions in connection to winding up 3. The person/partnership continuing the business
partnership affairs/completing unfinished (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1835)
transactions
3. Legal representative of last surviving partner equity from the other partners; it is the partnership
(CIVIL CODE, Art. 1836) that must refund the equity of the retiring partners.
However, before partners can be paid their shares,
The remedy of a partner who furnished the capital partnership creditors must first be compensated;
for the recovery of his money is not a action for whatever is left thereafter becomes available for the
estafa, but a civil one arising from the partnership payment of the partners’ shares. It is wrong to
contract for a liquidation of the partnership and a presume that capital contributions at the beginning
levy on its assets if there should be any. (U.S. v. of the partnership remains intact, unimpaired and
Clarin, 17 Phil. 84 (1910). available for distribution or return to the partners, or
that the total capital contribution in a partnership is
Since the parties entered into a joint venture as equivalent to the gross assets to be distributed to
evidenced by their JVA, the issues shall be the partners at the time of dissolution of the
governed by the laws on partnership. Since it has partnership. In the pursuit of a partnership business,
been proven that Primelink as developer of the its capital is either increased by profits earned or
subdivision project has defrauded the Lazatins from decreased by losses sustained; it does not remain
their share in the income, it was proper for the trial static and unaffected by the changing fortunes of the
court to give possession of the property under business. When partners venture into business
development to the Lazatins who had sought together, they should have prepared for the fact that
rescission of the JVA. However, the property is held their investment would either grow or shrink.
by the Lazatins for purposes of winding-up the Villareal v. Ramirez, 406 SCRA 145 (2003).
affairs of the joint venture as provided under Art.
1836. Until there is proper winding-up of the affairs 4. Limited Partnership
which requires the settlement of all claims of
partnership creditors, it would be premature for a. Characteristics Of Limited
Primelink to demand the value of the improvements Partnership
it has introduced on the property contributed by the
Lazatins. (Primelink Properties and Dev. Corp. v. a. Formed by two or more persons by complying
Lazatin-Magat, 493 SCRA 444 (2006)). with registration requirements having as
members one or more general partners and one
Failure of partner to have published her withdrawal, or more limited partners. The limited partners as
and her agreeing to have remaining partners such shall not be bound by the obligations of the
proceed with running the partnership business partnership. (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1843))
instead of insisting on the liquidation of the b. Subtantial compliance with statutory
partnership, will not relieve withdrawing partner from requriements (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1844)
her liability to the partnership creditors. Even if c. One or more general partners control the
withdrawing partner acted in good faith, this cannot business (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1843)
overcome the position of creditors who also acted in d. One or more general partners and one or more
good faith, without knowledge of her withdrawal limited partners. (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1843) Limited
from the partnership. Thus, when the partnership partners (i) contribute cash or other property,
executes a chattel mortgage over its properties in but not services (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1845); (ii)
favor of a withdrawing partner, and the withdrawal share in the profits but do not participate in the
was not published to bind the partnership creditors, management of the business (CIVIL CODE, Art.
and in fact the partnership itself was not dissolved 1848); and (iii) are not personally liable for
but allowed to be operated as a going concern by partnership obligations beyond their capital
the remaining partners, the partnership creditors contributions
have standing to seek the annulment of the chattel e. May ask for the return of their capital
mortgage for having been entered into adverse to contributions under conditions prescribed by
their interests. (Singson v. Isabela Sawmill, 88 law (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1857)
SCRA 623 (1979) f. Partnership debts are paid out of common fund
and the individual properties of general partners
A partner’s share cannot be returned without first (CIVIL CODE, Art. 1857)
dissolving and liquidating the business for the
partnership’s outside creditors have preference over
the enterprise’s assets. The firm’s property cannot
be diminished to their prejudice. (Magdusa v.
Albaran, G.R. No. L-17526)
POWERS
Restricted due to Subject to the
limited powers agreement of partners
1 2
For purposes of this part of the reviewer, unless otherwise Note: There is no 5 person minimum anymore for the
specified, all references refer to the Revised Corporation number of organizers (i.e., incorporators) of a Corporation
Code, Republic Act no. 11232. (hereinafter RCC) under the RCC. (see discussion at page 15, Subheading 5.A)
subject to laws and provisions applicable to shares, dividends, or allotments of the surplus
the Government or its entities and subject to profits on the basis of the shares held. (Sec. 3)
the control of the Government (Cervantes v.
Auditor General, G.R. No. L-4043, 1952). b. Nonstock corporation (Secs. 86-87) - A
• The GOCC Governance Act (R.A. 10149), corporation where no part of its income is
which governs compensation and position distributable as dividends to members, trustees or
classification systems within the GOCC officers. Any profit obtained as an incident to its
Sector, does not distinguish between operations shall, whenever necessary or proper, be
chartered and non-chartered GOCCs, and its used for the furtherance of the purpose for which the
provisions apply equally to both. (GSIS corporation was organized.
Family Bank Employees Union v. Villanueva,
G.R. No. 210773, 2019). As To Control
• In order to qualify as a GOCC, one must be a. Holding company – one that controls another as
organized either as a stock or non-stock a subsidiary or affiliate by the power to elect its
corporation. Section 31 defines a stock management; one which holds shares in other
corporation as one whose “capital stock is companies for purposes of control rather than for
divided into shares and ... authorized to mere investment. (SEC Opinion No. 15-15)
distribute to the holders of such shares
dividends.” Although BCDA has an b. Affiliate company – one that is subject to common
authorized capital of P100 Billion, however, it control of a parent or holding company and operated
is not divided into shares of stock; it has no as part of a system. (SEC Opinion No. 15-15)
voting shares; and has no provision which
authorizes the distribution of dividends and c. Parent and subsidiary companies – when a
allotment of surplus and profits to BCDA’s corporation has a controlling financial interest in one
stockholders. It cannot qualify also as a non- or more corporations, the one having control is
stock corporation because its primary known as the “parent company” and the controlled
purpose do not fall within the purposes corporations are known as the “subsidiary
enumerated under Section 88. (BCDA v. CIR, companies”.
G.R. No. 205925, 20 June 2018)
• However, there is now formal administrative As To Purpose of Incorporation
and statutory recognition of “government a. Municipal corporation
instrumentalities with corporate b. Religious corporation
powers/government corporate entities,” c. Educational corporation
which may not fall within the definition of d. Charitable, Scientific or Vocational corporation
stock and non-stock corporations, but are e. Business corporation
government instrumentalities that are vested
with corporate powers. (LRTA v. Quezon As To Number of Members
City, G.R. No. 221626, 2019) a. Aggregate - a corporation which consists of many
• Under the Constitution, the COA has audit persons united to form a body politic and corporate
jurisdiction over both GOCCs with original (IEMELIF v. Lazaro, G.R. No. 184088, 2010).
charters (subject to COA pre-audit) and those
without original charters (those organized b. Corporation sole – Formed by one person who
under the Corporation Code—subject to may be the chief archbishop, bishop, minister, rabbi,
post-audit). (Alejandrino v. COA, G.R. No. or other presiding elder of any religious
245400, 2019) denomination, sect or church. (Sec. 108)
Purpose: created to administer and manage the
As to Place of Incorporation affairs, properties, temporalities of the church to
a. Domestic – one incorporated under laws of the which the holder of the office belongs and also to
Philippines transmit the same to his successor in office.
b. Foreign – one formed, organized or existing under c. Close Corporation- a corporation where:
any laws other than those of the Philippines, and stockholders of record shall not exceed twenty (20);
whose laws allow Filipino citizens and corporations all the issued stock shall be subject to one or more
to do business in its own country. (Sec. 140) specified restrictions on transfer permitted by this
Title; and the corporation shall not list in any stock
As To Existence of Stocks exchange or make any public offering of its stocks
a. Stock corporation - Stock corporations are those of any class.
which have capital stock divided into shares and are
authorized to distribute to the holders of such
Notwithstanding, a corporation shall not be deemed corporate stockholders, Grandfather test would be
a close corporation when at least 2/3 of its voting applied (Narra Nickel Mining and Development
stock is owned or controlled by another corporation Corp. v. Redmont Consolidated Mines Corp., G.R.
which is not a close corporation within the meaning No. 195580, 2014)
of this Code. (Sec. 95)
a. Control Test
d. One Person Corporation- a corporation with a
single stockholder. Only a natural person, trust, or In cases involving properties, business or industries
an estate may form a One Person Corporation. reserved for Filipinos, in addition to the place of
Banks and quasi-banks, pre-need, trust, insurance, incorporation test, the nationality of a corporation is
public and publicly-listed companies, and non- determined by the nationality of the “controlling
chartered government-owned and -controlled stockholders”.
corporations may not incorporate as One Person
Corporations. A natural person who is licensed to Absent any doubt, the Control Test shall be used in
exercise a profession may not organize as a One determining the nationality of a corporation specially
Person Corporation for the purpose of exercising in cases where foreign ownership restrictions apply.
such profession except as otherwise provided under (SEC OGC Opinion No. 16-19)
special laws.
[T]here are two cases in determining the nationality
3. Nationality of Corporations of the Investee Corporation. The first case is the
‘liberal rule’, later coined by the SEC as the Control
Serves as a legal basis for subjecting the enterprise Test in its 30 May 1990 Opinion, and pertains to the
or its activities to the laws, the economic and fiscal portion in said Paragraph 7 of the 1967 SEC Rules
powers, and various social and financial policies of which states, ‘(s)hares belonging to corporations or
the state to which it is supposed to belong. partnerships at least 60% of the capital of which is
owned by Filipino citizens shall be considered as of
Tests to determine the nationality of Philippine nationality.’ Under the liberal Control
corporations: Test, there is no need to further trace the ownership
of the 60% (or more) Filipino stockholdings of the
1. Place of Incorporation Investing Corporation since a corporation which is
2. Control Test at least 60% Filipino-owned is considered as
3. Grandfather Rule3 Filipino. (Narra Nickel Mining and Development
Corp. v. Redmont Consolidated Mines Corp., G.R.
War-time – in times of war, nationality of corporation No. 195580, 2014).
is determined by the character or citizenship of its
controlling stockholders The required percentage of Filipino ownership
shall be applied to both:
4. Investment Test a. The total number of outstanding shares of
5. Place of Principal Business stock entitled to vote in the election of
directors, and
In order to determine the nationality of a corporation, b. The total number of outstanding shares of
the following steps should apply: stock, whether or not entitled to vote in the
election of directors. (SEC Memorandum
1st Step: The nationality of a corporation is Circular No. 8, s. 2013, Sec. 2)
determined by the country under whose laws it is
incorporated (Place of Incorporation Test). Mere legal title is not enough. Full beneficial
ownership of 60 percent of the outstanding capital
2nd Step: If the corporation is applying for a (2nd) stocks, coupled with 60 percent of the voting rights,
franchise for public utility and etc. which requires a is constitutionally required for the State's grant of
certain percentage of control of stock, the Test of authority to operate a public utility. Thus, voting
Controlling Ownership (i.e., the Control Test) would rights of stocks which have been assigned or
be applied. transferred to aliens cannot be considered held by
Philippine citizens or nationals (cannot give proxies
3rd step: If there is doubt as to the domestic control to vote). (Roy III v. Herbosa, et al., G.R. No. 207246,
of the percentage of stock in a corporation with 2016)
3
Emphasis on no. 2 & 3 for they are expressly indicated in the
bar syllabus.
The definition of “beneficial owner or beneficial primary franchise that makes a corporation
ownership in the SRC-IRR, which is in consonance a juridical person, but at the grant of the
with the concept of “full beneficial ownership” in the secondary franchise that authorizes the
FIA-IRR, is relevant in resolving only the question of corporation to engage in a nationalized
who is the beneficial owner or has beneficial industry. (People v. Quasha, G.R. No. L-
ownership of each “specific stock” of the public utility 6055, 1953)
whose stocks are under review. If the Filipino has
c. The Constitution requires a franchise for
the voting power of the “specific stock”, i.e., he can
vote the stock or direct another to vote for him, or operating a public utility; however, it does
the Filipino has the investment power over the not require a franchise before one can own
“specific stock”, i.e., he can dispose of that “specific the facilities needed to operate a public
stock” or direct another to vote or dispose it for him, utility so long as it does not operate them to
then such Filipino is the “beneficial owner” of that serve the public.(Tatad v. Garcia, Jr., G.R.
“specific stock.” Being considered Filipino, that No. 114222, 1995).
“specific stock” is then to be counted as part of the
60% Filipino ownership requirement under the Mass Media (100%)
Constitution. The right to the dividends, jus fruendi— a. Sec 11, Art XVI, 1987 Constitution –
a right emanating from ownership of that “specific ownership of mass media shall be limited to
stock” necessary accrues to its Filipino “beneficial the citizens of the Philippines, or to
owner.” (Roy III v. Herbosa, G.R. No. 207246 corporations, cooperatives or associations,
(Resolution), 18 April 2017.)
wholly-owned and managed by such
General Rule: The Control Test requires citizens (100% Filipino management of the
compliance with the Place of Incorporation Test. entity)
b. Cable Industry - CATV as “a form of mass
Exception: A corporation organized abroad and media which must, therefore, be owned
registered as doing business in the Philippines and managed by Filipino citizens, or
under the Corporation Code, whose capital corporations, cooperatives or associations,
outstanding stock and entitled to vote is wholly wholly-owned and managed by Filipino
owned by Filipinos is a Philippine National. (SEC citizens pursuant to the mandate of the
Opinion No. 04-14 in reference to the Foreign Constitution.” (DOJ Opinion No. 95, series
Investments Act) of 1999).
Some instances wherein the Control Test
Advertising Industry (> 70%)
applies:
a. Sec 11, Art XVI, 1987 Constitution – only
Exploitation of natural resources (> 60%)
Filipino citizens or corporations or
a. Sec 2, Art XII, 1987 Constitution – policy of
associations at least 70% of the capital of
the State is to ensure that the exploitation
which is owned by such citizens shall be
of natural resources or the pursuit of the
allowed to engage in the advertising
activities deemed to be of public or national
agency
interest are in the control of the Filipinos
b. The State may directly undertake such
NEDA could advise Congress to set limitations of
activities, or it may enter into co-production,
stock ownership in Corporations vested with Public
joint venture, or production sharing
Interests (Sec. 176)
agreements with:
i) Filipino citizens; or
Double 60% Rule
ii) Corporations or associations, at least
Where a corporation and its non-Filipino
60% owned by such citizens stockholders own stock in a SEC-registered
enterprise, at least 60% of the outstanding capital
Public Utilities (> 60%) stock and entitled to vote of both corporations and
a. Sec 11, Art XII, 1987 Constitution – requires at least 60% of the members of the Board of
that only domestic corporations with at least Directors of both corporations must be Filipino
60% of the capital stock owned by Filipinos citizens (R.A. No. 7042, Sec. 3[a], as amended)
may own and operate public utilities in the
Philippines
b. The nationality test for public utilities
applies not at the time of the grant of the
The “grandfather rule” does not eschew, but in fact Exception: When the corporation is used as a cloak
for fraud, illegality, or in other certain circumstances,
supplements the “control test”, as the latter implements
the courts may disregard the separate and distinct
Filipinization provisions of the Constitution. (Narra
personality of the corporation and treat the
Nickel Mining and Development Corp. v. Redmont
corporation as a mere collection of individuals
Consolidated Mines Corp., G.R. No. 195580, 2015).
undertaking business as a group (Doctrine of
Piercing the Veil of Corporate Fiction).
c. Other Tests
A corporation is a juridical entity with a legal
A. War-Time Test
personality separate and distinct from those acting
In times of war, nationality of corporation is
for and on its behalf, and, in general, from the
determined by the character or citizenship of its
people comprising it; the obligations incurred by the
controlling stockholders
corporation, acting through its directors, officers and
employees are its sole liabilities (Santos v NLRC,
B. Place of Principal Business Test
G.R. No. 101699, 1996).
Residence of a corporation is the place where its
principal office is located, as stated in its Articles of
While a share of stock represents a proportionate or
Incorporation.
aliquot interest in the property of the corporation, it
does not vest the owner thereof with any legal right
The place where the principal office of the
or title to any of the corporate property, his interest
corporation is to be located is one of the required
in such property being equitable or beneficial in
contents of the articles of incorporation to be filed
nature. Shareholders are in no legal sense the
with the SEC (Hyatt Elevators v. Goldstar, G.R. No.
owners of corporate property, which is owned by the
161026, 2005).
corporation as a distinct legal person (Magsaysay-
Labrador v CA, G.R. No. 58168, 1989).
Applied to determine whether a state has jurisdiction
over the existence and legal character of a
compensation; can only be proceeded against by Note: A corporation may not be made to answer for
due process of law; and is protected against acts or liabilities of its stockholders or those of the
unlawful discrimination (Bache & Co. (Phil.), Inc. v. legal entities which it may be connected and vice-
Ruiz, G.R. No. 32409, 1971, citing Hale v. Henkel, versa (ARB Constructions Co., Inc. v. Court of
201 U.S. 43, 50 L.Ed. 652.). Appeals, G.R. No. 126554, 2000).
corporations to which they are stockholders absent or is merely a farce since the corporation is
any allegation, much less, even a scintilla of merely the alter ego, business conduit, or
substantiation, that the parties interest in the instrumentality of a person or another
corporation are so considerable as to merit a entity.
declaration of unity of their civil personalities (CKH c. Equity cases – when piercing the
Industrial and Development Corp. v. CA, G.R. No. corporate fiction is necessary to achieve
111890, 1997). justice or equity.
Even when the foreclosure on the assets of the Note: The three cases may appear together in one
corporation was wrongful and done in bad faith, the application (R.F. Sugay & Co. v. Reyes, G.R. No. L-
stockholders of the corporation have no standing to 20451, 1964).
recover for themselves moral damages. Otherwise,
it would amount to the appropriation by, and the i. Grounds for application of the different types
distribution to, such stockholders of part of the of piercing
corporation’s assets before the dissolution of the
corporation and the liquidation of its debts and For Fraud Cases:
liabilities (APT v. CA, G.R. No. 121171, 1998). a. There must have been fraud or an evil
motive in the affected transaction, and
Where real properties included in the inventory of the mere proof of control of the corporation
the estate of a decedent are in the possession of by itself would not authorize piercing; and
and are registered in the name of the corporations, b. The main action should seek for the
in the absence of any cogency to shred the veil of enforcement of pecuniary claims
corporate fiction, the presumption of conclusiveness pertaining to the corporation against
of said titles in favor of said corporations should corporate officers or stockholders.
stand undisturbed (Lim v. CA, G.R. No. 124715,
2000). Example cases:
• Where a stockholder, who has absolute
b. Doctrine of Piercing the control over the affairs of the corporation,
Corporate Veil entered into a contract with another
corporation through fraud and false
Under certain circumstances, the courts may representations, such stockholder shall be
disregard the separate and distinct personality of the liable solidarily with co-defendant corporation
corporation from its members or stockholders and even when the contract sued upon was
treat the corporation as a mere collection of entered into on behalf of the corporation
individuals or an aggregation of persons (NAMARCO v. Associated Finance Co.,G.R.
undertaking business as a group such as when the No. L-20886, 1967).
corporate legal entity is used as a cloak for fraud or • Piercing is allowed where the corporation is
illegality (Kukan Int’l v Reyes, G.R. No. 182729, used as a means to appropriate a property by
2010). fraud which property was later resold to the
controlling stockholders. (Heirs of Ramon
It is an equitable doctrine used as a last resort Durano, Sr. v. Uy, G.R no.136456, 2000).
only when the objective is to hold the officers and/or • Fraud and bad faith on the part of certain
stockholders liable. Thus, in one case, it cannot be corporate officers or stockholders may
applied in order to declare a foreclosure proceeding warrant the piercing of the veil of corporate
a nullity (Umali v. CA, GR No. 89561, 1990). fiction so that the said individual may not
seek refuge therein, but may be held
Being merely an equitable remedy, employment of individually and personally liable for his or her
the piercing doctrine can only be for the “protection actions. (Lafarge Cement Phils., Inc. v.
of the interests of innocent third persons Continental Cement Corp., G.R. no. 155173,
dealing with the corporate entity which the law 2004)
aims to protect by this doctrine” (Traders Royal
Bank v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 93397, 1997). For Alter-ego Cases:
a. The doctrine applies in this case even in the
Classification of piercing cases: absence of evil intent; it applies because of
a. Fraud piercing – when a corporate entity the direct violation of a central corporate
is used to commit fraud or justify a wrong or law principle of separating ownership from
to defend a crime. management.
b. Alter-ego piercing – when a corporate b. The doctrine in such cases is based on
entity is used to defeat public convenience estoppel: if stockholders do not respect the
separate entity, others cannot also be c. The parent company finances the
expected to be bound by the separate subsidiary.
juridical entity. d. The parent company subscribed to all the
c. Piercing in alter ego cases may prevail capital stock of the subsidiary or otherwise
even when no monetary claims are sought caused its incorporation.
to be enforced against the stockholders or e. The subsidiary has grossly inadequate
officers of the corporation. capital.
f. The parent corporation pays the salaries
ii. Tests for Applicability of the Doctrine of and other expenses or losses of the
Piercing the Veil of Corporate Fiction: subsidiary.
a. Control – not mere stock control but g. The subsidiary has substantially no
Complete Domination – not only of business except with the parent corporation
finances, but of policy and business or no assets except those conveyed to or
practice in respect to the transaction by the parent corporation.
attacked and must have been such that the h. The papers of the parent corporation or in
corporate entity as to this transaction had at the statements of its officers, the subsidiary
the time no separate mind, will or existence is described as a department or subdivision
of its own. of the parent corporation, or its business or
b. Such control must have been Used by the financial responsibility is referred to as the
defendant to commit a fraud or wrong to parent corporation’s own.
perpetuate the violation of a statutory or i. The parent corporation uses the property of
other positive legal breach of duty, or a the subsidiary as its own.
dishonest and an unjust act in j. The directors or executives of the
contravention of the plaintiff’s legal right; subsidiary do not act independently in the
and, interest of the subsidiary but take their
c. The said control and breach of duty must orders from the parent corporation.
have Proximately caused the injury or k. The formal legal requirements of the
unjust loss complained of (Concept subsidiary are not observed (Phil. National
Builders Inc. v. NLRC, 108734, 1996). Bank v. Ritratto Group, Inc., GR No.
142616, 2001).
These were expanded as three-pronged tests
The first prong is the "instrumentality" or Note: Mere ownership by a single stockholder or by
"control" test. This test requires that the subsidiary another corporation of all or substantially all of the
be completely under the control and domination of capital stock of the corporation does not justify the
the parent corporation or shareholder. It seeks to application of the doctrine (Francisco v. Mejia, G.R.
establish whether the corporation has no autonomy No. 141617, 2001).
and the parent corporation or shareholder "is
operating the business directly for itself or Example of situations wherein the Doctrine of
themselves." Piercing the Corporate Veil was used:
a. Where the stock of a corporation is owned
The second prong is the "fraud" test. This test by one person whereby the corporation
requires that the conduct in using the corporation be functions only for the benefit of such
unjust, fraudulent or wrongful. individual owner, the corporation and the
individual should be deemed the same
The third prong is the "harm" test. This test (Arnold v. Willets and Patterson, Ltd., G.R.
requires the plaintiff to show that the defendant’s No. L-20214, 1923).
control, exerted in a fraudulent, illegal or otherwise b. When the corporation is merely an adjunct,
unfair manner toward it, caused the harm suffered business conduit or alter ego of another
(PNB v. Hydro Resources Contractors corporation, the fiction of separate and
Corporations, G.R. no. 167530, 2013). distinct corporation entities should be
disregarded (Tan Boon Bee & Co. v.
Factors to Consider in cases of Parent and Jarencio, G.R. No. L-41337, 1988).
Subsidiary corporations in Alter-ego Piercing: c. Employment of same workers; single place
a. The parent corporation owns all or most of of business, etc. (La Campana Coffee
the capital of the subsidiary. Factory v. Kaisahan ng Manggagawa, G.R.
b. The parent and subsidiary corporations No. L-5677, 1953).
have common directors or officers. d. Use of nominees (Marvel Building v. David,
G.R. No. L-508, 1951)
e. Avoidance of tax. (Yutivo Sons Hardware v. b. When used to raise issues relating only to
Court of Tax Appeals, G.R. No. L-13203, technicalities (Emilio Cano Ent. v. CIR,
1961; Liddell& Co. v. Collector of Internal G.R. No. L-20502, 1965).
Revenue, G.R. No. L-9687, 1961).
f. Mixing of bank deposit accounts. (Ramirez The veil may not always be pierced, especially in
Telephone Corp. v. Bank of America, G.R. the following circumstances:
No. L-22614, 1969).
g. Where it appears that two business a. Piercing is a remedy of last resort and is not
enterprises are owned, conducted, and available when other remedies are still
controlled by the same parties, both law available (Umali v. CA, G.R. No. 89561,
and equity will, when necessary to protect 1990).
the rights of third persons, disregard the b. One cannot successfully invoke the
legal fiction that two corporations are piercing doctrine when it was proven that
distinct entities and treat them as identical the act done was contrary to the existing
(Sibagat Timber Corp. v. Garcia, G.R. No. rules, which were well-known to the
98185, 1992) officers of the one invoking it (Traders
h. Thinly-capitalized corporations (McConnel Royal Bank v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. L-10510, 93397, 1997).
1961). c. Piercing is forbidden unless the remedy
i. Parent-subsidiary relationship. (Koppel sought is to make the stockholder, officer
(Phil.), Inc. v. Yatco, G.R. No. L- or another corporation pecuniarily liable
47673,1946; Philippine Veterans for corporate debts (Umali v. CA, G.R.
Investment Development Corporation v. No. 89561, 1990; Indophil Textile Mill
CA, G.R. No. 85266, 1990) Workers Union-PTGWO v. Calica, G.R. No.
j. Affiliated companies (Guatson International 96490, 1992).
Travel and Tours, Inc. v. NLRC, G.R. No.
100322, 1994) Note: However, piercing in alter ego cases may
prevail even when no monetary claims are sought to
Note: While each of the above situations resulted be enforced against the stockholders or officers of
in the Court piercing the veil of corporate fiction, the corporation. (e.g. piercing for other purposes
the elements – control, injury to others, etc. – were such as laborer’s rights)
also present and likewise determinants.
d. Piercing is forbidden when the personal
Summary of Probative Factors (Philippine National obligations of an individual are sought
Bank vs. Ritratto Group, Inc., et al., G.R. No. to be enforced against the corporation
142616, 2001; Concept Builders, Inc. v. NLRC, G.R. (Robledo v. NLRC, G.R. No. 110358,
No. 108734, 1996): Whether the separate 1994).
personality of the corporation should be pierced
depends on questions of facts, appropriately Note: As an exception to this rule, the Supreme
pleaded. Mere allegation that a corporation is the Court allowed such piercing by applying the concept
alter ego of the individual stockholders is of “reverse piercing”. In a traditional veil-
insufficient. The presumption is that the piercing action, a court disregards the existence of
stockholders or officers and the corporation are the corporate entity so a claimant can reach the
distinct entities. The burden of proving otherwise is assets of a corporate insider. In a reverse piercing
on the party seeking to have the court pierce the veil action, however, the plaintiff seeks to reach the
of corporate entity (Ramoso v. CA, G.R. No. assets of a corporation to satisfy claims against a
117416, 2000). corporate insider."
Academy of Management and Economics vs. Litton jurisdiction. It is not available to confer
and Company, G.R. No. 191525, 2017). jurisdiction over a party not impleaded
in a case. (Mayor v. Tiu, G.R. No. 203770,
e. To disregard the separate juridical 2016)
personality of a corporation, the
wrongdoing must be clearly and De Facto Corporation Versus Corporations By
convincingly established. It cannot be Estoppel
presumed (DBP vs. CA, G.R. No. 126200,
2001). As To Legal Status
f. Piercing of the veil of corporate fiction is not De jure corporation
allowed when it is resorted to justify a. Corporation organized in accordance with
under a theory of co-ownership the requirements of law;
continued use and possession by b. Every corporation is deemed to be a de jure
stockholders of corporate properties until proven otherwise
(Boyer-Roxas v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
100866, 1992). De facto corporation (Sec. 19)
g. The piercing doctrine cannot be availed of
a. A corporation claiming in good faith to be a
in order to dislodge from the jurisdiction
of the SEC the petition for suspension of corporation under the Corporation Code but
payments filed under Section 5(e) of Pres. where there exists a flaw in its incorporation
Decree No. 902-A, on the ground that the or it falls short of the requirements provided
petitioning individuals should be treated as by law.
the real petitioners to the exclusion of the b. It is the result of an attempt to incorporate
petitioning corporate debtor (Union Bank v. under an existing law coupled with the
CA, G.R. No. 131729, 1998). exercise of corporate powers.
h. Changing of the petitioner’s subsidiary c. A de facto corporation will incur the same
liabilities by converting them to guarantors obligations; have the same powers and
of bad debts cannot be done by piercing the rights as a de jure corporation.
veil of corporate identity (Ramoso v. CA, d. The due incorporation of any corporation
G.R. No. 117416, 2000)
claiming in good faith to be a corporation
i. Piercing doctrine is meant to prevent fraud,
under the Corporation Code, and its right to
and cannot be employed to perpetrate
fraud or a wrong (Araneta, Inc. v. Tuason, exercise corporate powers, shall not be
G.R. No. L-2886, 1952). inquired into collaterally in any private suit.
j. Corporate persons are entitled to due e. Under the Rules of Court Rule 66, inquiry
process protection. Thus, failure to must be done by the Solicitor General in a
implead a corporation in a suit for quo warranto proceeding where the main
recovery of ill-gotten wealth against its issue is the right to exist as a corporation
stockholders cannot bind the
corporation itself; otherwise, its Elements of a de facto corporation
fundamental right to due process will be a. Valid law under which incorporated;
violated. (COCOFED v. Republic, G.R. No. b. Attempt in good faith to incorporate or
177857-58, 2016) “colorable compliance;”
k. Mere ownership of all or nearly all of the c. Assumption of corporate powers; and
capital stocks of a corporation is not in itself d. Issuance of certificate of incorporation.
a sufficient reason for disregarding the
(Arnold Hall v. Piccio, G.R. No. L-2598, 1950)
fiction of separate corporate personalities.
The probate court applied doctrine of
Note: A corporation which has failed to file its by-
piercing the corporate veil since Rosario
laws within the prescribed period does not ipso facto
had no other properties that comprise her
lose its powers as such (Sawadjaan v. CA, G.R. No.
estate other than her shares. Although the
141735, 2005).
intention to protect the shares from
dissipation is laudable, it is still an error to
Corporation by estoppel (Sec. 20);
order tenants to remit payments to the
All persons who assume to act as a corporation
estate. Also, the court has not acquired
knowing it to be without authority to do so shall be
jurisdiction over Primrose and its
liable as general partners for all debts, liabilities and
properties. Piercing applies to the
damages incurred or arising as a result thereof
determination of liability not of
When such ostensible corporation is sued on any a. Application for registration must be
transaction entered by it as a corporation or on any accompanied with an affidavit,
tort committed by it as such, it shall not be allowed executed by all the partners, indicating
to use its lack of corporate personality as a defense. that they authorized the partnership to
be an incorporator and have
Anyone who assumes an obligation to an ostensible designated one of the partners to sign
corporation as such cannot resist performance the incorporation documents.
thereof on the ground that there was in fact no b. Partnerships under Dissolved or
corporation. Expired status with the SEC shall not
be authorized to become an
Corporation by prescription incorporator.
The Roman Catholic Church is a corporation by
prescription, with acknowledged juridical personality For Domestic Corporations or Associations as
inasmuch as it is an institution which antedated by Incorporators:
almost a thousand years any other personality in a. Its investment in the new corporation
Europe (Barlin v Ramirez, G.R. No. L-2832, 1906). must be approved by a majority of the
board of directors or trustees ratified by
5. Capital Structure the stockholders representing at least
two- thirds (2⁄3) of the outstanding
a. Number and Qualifications of capital stock, or at least two-thirds (2⁄3)
Incorporators of the members in cases of nonstock
corporations.
Incorporators4 – Incorporators are those b. A Directors'/Trustees' Certificate or a
stockholders or members mentioned in the articles Secretary's Certificate, indicating the
of incorporation as originally forming and composing necessary approvals, as well as the
the corporation and who are signatories thereof authorized signatory to the
(Sec.5). incorporation documents, shall be
executed under oath and submitted by
They must: the applicant.
a. Be a natural person, partnership, c. Domestic corporations under
b. association or corporation, singly or jointly "delinquent", "suspended", "revoked"
with others but not more than fifteen (15)5 or "expired" status with the SEC shall
i. May be composed of any not be authorized to become an
combination of natural person/s, incorporator.
SEC-registered partnership/s,
SEC-registered domestic For Foreign Corporations as incorporators:
corporation/s or associations, and a. The application for registration must be
foreign corporation/s (SEC MC No. accompanied by a copy of a document
16-19) duly authenticated by a Philippine
c. If natural persons, be of Legal Age; Consulate or with an apostille affixed
d. Each owns or subscribes to at least one thereto, authorizing the foreign
share for stock corporations and be a corporation to invest in the corporation
member for non-stock corporations. being formed and specifically naming
the designated signatory on behalf of
Note: Natural persons who are licensed to practice the foreign corporation.
a profession, and partnerships or associations
organized for the purpose of practicing a profession, b. Subscription Requirements
shall not be allowed to organize as a corporation (for
the practice of such profession) unless otherwise Minimum Capital Stock and Subscription
provided under special laws. (Sec. 10) Requirements
Stock corporations shall not be required to have a
Additional Guidelines issued by the SEC minimum capital stock, except as otherwise
(SEC MC no.16-19): specifically provided by special law (Sec 12)
4
Note: Amendments were introduced by the RCC removing
5
the qualifications to be natural persons, and majority must be Note: A corporation with a single stockholder is considered
residents of the Philippines; either as an One Person Corporation or a Corporation Sole.
Note: The RCC completely removes Sec. 13 of the Doctrine of Relations or Relating Back Doctrine
Old Corporation Code which provided for the 25-25 Where the delay in affecting the amendment is due
rule upon incorporation to the neglect of the officer with whom the certificate
is required to be filed, or to a wrongful refusal on his
c. Corporate Term (Sec. 11) part to receive it, the same will be treated as having
been filed before the expiry date. The doctrine does
not apply where the delay is attributable to the
Perpetual Existence
corporation (Alhambra Cigar v. SEC, G.R. No. L-
General Rule: A corporation shall have perpetual
23606, 1968)
existence
Revival of Corporate Existence
Exception: Unless its articles of incorporation
If a corporation’s term has expired, it may apply for
provide otherwise.
a revival of its corporate existence, together with all
the rights and privileges under its certificate of
For Corporations with certificates of incorporations
incorporation and subject to all of its duties, debts
issued prior to the effectivity of this code and which
and liabilities existing prior to its revival. Upon
continues to exist shall have perpetual existence,
approval by the SEC, the corporation shall be
unless:
deemed revived and a certificate of revival of
a. Upon a vote of its majority stockholders
corporate existence shall be issued, giving it
representing majority of its outstanding
perpetual existence, unless its application for revival
capital stock,
provides otherwise.
b. the corporation notifies the SEC that it
elects to retain its specific corporate
Who may file for petition for revival of corporate
term pursuant to its articles of
existence:
incorporation.
Generally, a corporation whose term has expired;
Any change in the corporate term under this section
a. An Expired Corporation whose Certificate
is without prejudice to the appraisal right of
of Registration has been revoked for non-
dissenting stockholders in accordance with the
filing of reports,
provisions of this Code.
b. An Expired Corporation whose Certificate
of Registration has been suspended
Extension of Corporate Term
General Rule: A corporate term for a specific period
NOTE: For a and b: it shall file the proper Petition
may be extended or shortened by amending the
to Lift its Suspended Status, which may be
articles of incorporation
incorporated in its Petition to Revive, and must
settle the corresponding penalties thereof
Limitation: No extension may be made earlier than
three (3) years prior to the original or subsequent
c. An Expired Corporation whose corporate
expiry date(s)
name has already been validly re-used,
and is currently being used, by another
Exception: There are justifiable reasons for an
existing corporation duly registered with
earlier extension as may be determined by the SEC
the SEC, provided that the former shall
change its corporate name within thirty
Effects
(30) days from the issuance of its
If Extended If NOT extended or
Certificate of Revival of Corporate
expired
Existence. (SEC Memo. Circ. no. 23-19)
Such extension of the Upon expiration of the
corporate term shall period fixed in the Who may not file?
take effect only on the articles of
a. An Expired Corporation which has
day following the incorporation, in the completed the liquidation of its assets;
original or subsequent absence of b. A corporation whose Certificate of
expiry date(s). compliance with the Registration has been revoked for reasons
legal requisites for the other than non-filing of reports;
extension of the c. A corporation dissolved by virtue of
period, the corporation Sections 6(c) and 6(d) of SEC
is dissolved ipso facto. Reorganization Act;
(PNB v. CFI Rizal, d. An Expired Corporation which already
G.R. No. 63201, 1992) availed of re-registration or other
memorandum circulars issued by the SEC b. Preferred shares may be preferred (a)
pertaining to re-registration, except when: as to dividends, or (b) as to distribution
i. The re-registered corporation has of assets during liquidation, or (c) as to
given its consent to the Petitioner any other manner stated in the Articles,
to use its corporate name, and has not violative of the Corp Code. If
undertaken to undergo voluntary authorized by Articles, Board may fix
dissolution immediately after the terms. It is ALWAYS with a stated par
issuance of the Petitioner's value.
Certificate of Revival; or
ii. The re-registered corporation has ii. Par Value and No-Par Value
given its consent to the Petitioner a. Par value shares - with a pre-stated
to use its corporate name, and has amount or denomination.
undertaken to change its corporate b. Non- par value - no pre-stated value.
name immediately after the
issuance of the Petitioner's Non-par value shares are deemed fully paid and
Certificate of Revival. (SEC Memo. non-assessable so holders of such are not liable to
Circ. no. 23-19) the corporation or its creditors.
No application for revival of certificate of The consideration received is treated as capital and
incorporation of following corporations shall be cannot be declared as dividends.
approved by the SEC unless accompanied by a
favorable recommendation of the appropriate Because they are vested with public interest, the
government agency: following types of corporations may only issue par
1. Banks, value shares:
2. Banking and quasi banking institutions, 1. Banks
3. Preneed, Insurance and trust companies, 2. Trust Companies
4. Non-stock savings and loan associations 3. Insurance Companies
(NSSLAs), 4. Public Utilities
5. Pawnshops, 5. Building and Loan Association
6. Corporations engaged in money service
business, and iii. Voting and Non- Voting Shares
7. Other financial intermediaries (Sec. 11) a. Voting share with complete voting
rights
Required Vote to Initiate Revival: b. Non - voting shares are preferred or
The required number of votes for the Revival of an redeemable shares that have limited
Expired Stock Corporation is at least a majority vote voting rights.
of the board of directors, and the vote of at least
majority of the outstanding capital stock. For Non-Voting Shares Have Voting Rights In
nonstock corporations, at least a majority vote of the The Following Matters:
board of trustees, and the vote of at least majority of 1. Amendment of Articles
the members. (SEC MC no. 23-19) 2. Adoption/ Amendment of By- Laws
3. Sale, lease, exchange, mortgage,
d. Classification of Shares (Sec. 6) pledge or dispose of all or
substantially all of corporate property
The classification of shares, their corresponding 4. Incur, create, increase bonded
rights, privileges, or restrictions, and their stated par indebtedness
value, if any, must be indicated in the articles of 5. Increase, decrease capital stock
incorporation. 6. Merger/ consolidation with another
corporation
Doctrine of Equality of Shares 7. Investment of funds in another
Each share shall be equal in all respects to every corporation
other share, except as otherwise provided in the 8. Dissolution of corporation
articles of incorporation and in the certificate of
stock. (sec. 6)
In contrast:
Post-incorporation subscription – entered into e. Articles of Incorporation
after incorporation, such as for the unsubscribed
portion of the authorized capital stock and for the Nature and Function of Articles
purchase of increased capital stocks after an The Articles of Incorporation is a basic contract
amendment of the article of incorporation. document in Corporate Law which defines the
charter of the corporation. Section 13 of the
d. Consideration for Stocks (Sec. Corporation Code provides that the Articles of
61) Incorporation do not become binding as the charter
of the corporation unless they have been filed with
Stocks shall not be issued for a consideration less and registered with the SEC.
than the par or issued price thereof.
Note: The Articles of Incorporation defines the
Consideration for issuance of stock may be by contractual relationships between the State and the
corporation, the stockholders and the State, and
any or a combination of any two or more of the
following: between the corporation and its stockholders
a. Cash actually paid (Lanuza v. CA, G.R. No. 131394, 2005).
b. Property (tangible or intangible)
(1) Contents (Sec. 13)
actually received and necessary or
convenient for the corporation’s use
c. Labor performed or service actually All corporations shall file with the SEC articles of
incorporation in any of the official languages, duly
rendered to the corporation
d. Debts incurred previously by the signed and acknowledged or authenticated, in such
corporation (for subscriptions after form and manner as may be allowed by the SEC,
containing substantially the following matters,
incorporation)
except as otherwise prescribed by this Code or by
special law:
3. Names of original subscribers to capital applicable laws and/or revoke the registration of
stock and subscribed and paid-up capital the corporation.(Sec. 17)
4. Treasurer-in-trust elected by original
subscribers Other Limitations on the Use of Corporate
5. Members who contributed to the initial Name:
capital of non-stock corporation a. The Corporate Name of the following
6. Witnesses and acknowledgments entities shall include:
1. For a Corporation- "Corporation" or
f. Corporate Name and "Incorporated," or the abbreviations
Limitations on its Use "Corp." or "Inc."
2. For One Person Corporations- “OPC”
Corporate Name (Sec. 17) 3. Partnerships
A corporation’s right to use its corporate and trade i. General Partnerships -
name is a property right, it is a right in rem which it "Company" or "Co."
may assert or protect against the whole world in the ii. limited partnership, the
same manner as it may protect its tangible property word "Limited" or "Ltd."
against trespass or conversion (Philips Export v. iii. Professional partnership -
CA, G.R. No. 96161, 1992) "Company," "Associates,"
or "Partners," or other
Statutory Limitations on Use of Corporate similar descriptions;
Name 4. For Foundations- “Foundation”
No corporate name shall be allowed by the SEC if: 5. For engaging in microfinance activities
a. it is not distinguishable from that already - "Microfinance" or
reserved or registered for the use of another i. "Microfinancing"
corporation, 6. Other words or phrases, authorized by
b. if such name is already protected by law, or law or other rules and regulations, to
c. when its use is contrary to existing law, rules be used by specific corporations or
and regulations. partnerships
b. A term that describes the business of a
“Non distinguishable” corporation in its name should refer to its
A name is not distinguishable even if it contains primary purpose. If there are two such
one or more of the following: terms, the first should refer to the primary
a. The word “corporation”, “company”, purpose and the second to the
“incorporated”, “limited”, “limited liability”, or secondary purpose.
an abbreviation of one of such words; and c. If the name is similar to a registered
b. Punctuations, articles, conjunctions, corporation or partnership, the applicant
contractions, prepositions, abbreviations, shall add distinctive word/s to the proposed
different tenses, spacing, or number of the name to remove the similarity from the
same word or phrase. registered name
Effects if Statutory Limitations are Violated: Note: This shall not be allowed if the registered
a. SEC may summarily order the corporation to name is coined or unique unless the board of
immediately cease and desist from using directors or majority of the partners gives its
such name and require the corporation to consent to the applied name.
register a new one.
b. The SEC shall also cause the removal of all d. A name that consists solely of special
visible signages, marks, advertisements, symbols, punctuation marks or specially
labels, prints and other effects bearing such designed characters shall not be
corporate name. registered.
c. Upon the approval of the new corporate e. The name of an internationally known
name, the SEC shall issue a certificate of foreign corporation cannot be used by a
incorporation under the amended name. domestic corporation unless it is its
subsidiary and the parent corporation has
Note: If the corporation fails to comply with the consented to such use.
SEC’s order, the SEC may hold the corporation f. A name written in a foreign language, even
and its responsible directors or officers in contempt if registered in another country, shall not be
and/or hold them administratively, civilly and/or registered if the name violates good
criminally liable under this Code and other morals, public order or public policy
8. Other special corporations governed by 1992; quoting from Thompson on Corporation Sec.
special laws 4137, cited in Fleischer v. Nolasco, G.R. No. L-
23241, 1925).
FAILURE TO Adopt And Maintain The Bylaws
Now Specifically Criminally Punishable And C. By-law provisions cannot discriminate
Subject To Sec’s Contempt Power (Sec. 161) among its stockholders or members
A. By-laws cannot be contrary to law and A private corporation may provide the following in
articles of incorporation its bylaws:
1. The time, place and manner of calling and
A by-law provision granting to a stockholder a conducting regular or special meetings of the
permanent representation in the Board of Directors directors or trustees;
is contrary to the Corporation Code requiring all 2. The time and manner of calling and
members of the Board to be elected by the conducting regular or special meetings and
stockholders or members. Even when the members mode of notifying the stockholders or
of the association may have formally adopted the members thereof;
provision, their action would be of no avail because 3. The required quorum in meetings of
no provision of the by-laws can be adopted if it is stockholders or members and the manner of
contrary to law (Grace Christian High School v. CA, voting therein;
G.R. No. 108905 , 1997). 4. The modes by which a stockholder, member,
director, or trustee may attend meetings and
Although the right to amend by-laws lies solely in the cast their votes;
discretion of the employer, this being in the exercise 5. The form for proxies of stockholders and
of management prerogative or business judgment, members and the manner of voting them;
such right cannot impair the obligation of existing 6. The directors’ or trustees’ qualifications,
contracts or rights or undermine the right to security duties and responsibilities, the guidelines for
of tenure of a regular employee. Otherwise, it would setting the compensation of directors or
enable an employer to remove any employee from trustees and officers, and the maximum
employment by the simple expediency of amending number of other board representations that
its by-laws and providing the position shall cease to an independent director or trustee may have
exist upon occurrence of a specified event which shall, in no case, be more than the
(Salafranca v. Philamlife (Pamplona) Village number prescribed by the SEC;
Homeowners Association, Inc., G.R. No. 121791, 7. The time for holding the annual election of
1998) directors or trustees and the mode or manner
of giving notice thereof;
By-laws that prohibit directors who have interests in 8. The manner of election or appointment and
competitor corporations are reasonable in order to the term of office of all officers other than
protect the interests of the company (Gokongwei v. directors or trustees;
SEC, G.R. No. L-45911, 1979) 9. The penalties for violation of the bylaws;
10. In the case of stock corporations, the manner
B. By-laws cannot be unreasonable or be of issuing stock certificates; and
contrary to the nature of by-laws (GPI v. El 11. Such other matters as may be necessary for
Hogar Filipino, G.R. No. L-26649, 1927). the proper or convenient transaction of its
corporate affairs for the promotion of good
Authority granted to a corporation to regulate the governance and anti-graft and corruption
transfer of its stock does not empower corporation measures.
to restrict the right of a stockholder to transfer his
shares, but merely authorizes the adoption of Note: An arbitration agreement may be provided in
regulations as to the formalities and procedure to be the bylaws pursuant to Section 181 of this Code.
followed in effecting transfer (Thomson v. CA, G.R.
No. 116631, 1998). (2) Binding Effects
By-laws are intended merely for the protection of the Binding effect of by-laws
corporation, and prescribe regulation, not 1. As to the corporation and its components -
restrictions; they are always subject to the charter of Binding not only upon the corporation but
the corporation (Rural Bank of Salinas, Inc. v. CA, also on its stockholder, members and those
b. Implied/necessary powers – Those that can 3) Power to deny pre-emptive rights (Sec. 38)
be inferred from or necessary for the exercise 4) Power to sell or dispose corporate assets
of the express powers or for the pursuit of its (Sec. 39)
purposes as provided in the Charter. Examples 5) Power to acquire own shares (Sec. 40)
are powers related to the same line of business 6) Power to invest corporate funds in another
(e.g. stevedoring services to unload coal to its corporation or business (Sec. 41)
pier for corporations supplying electric power) 7) Power to declare dividends (Sec. 42)
c. Incidental/inherent powers – Those that are 8) Power to enter into management contract
deemed to be within the capacity of corporate (Sec. 43)
entities. These “necessarily flow” from the
business and attach at the moment of creation c. Power to Extend or Shorten
without regard to express powers or primary Corporate Term (Sec. 36)
purpose.
There should be a written notice of
General Express Powers under the Corporation stockholders/members meeting stating:
Code (Sec. 35) ● Proposed action and time and place of
a. Sue and be sued in its corporate name; meeting
b. Succession; ● Addressed to each stockholder/ member
c. Adopt and use a corporate Seal; ● Deposited to the addressee in post office,
d. Amend Articles of Incorporation with postage prepaid or served personally;
e. Adopt, amend or repeal By-laws;
f. For stock corporations – Issue stocks to Note: When allowed in the by-laws or done with the
subscribers and to sell treasury stocks; for non- consent of the stockholder, sent electronically in
stock corporations – admit members; accordance with the rules and regulations of the
g. Purchase, receive, take, or grant, hold, convey, SEC on the use of electronic data messages
sell, lease, pledge, mortgage and otherwise
Vote needed:
deal with real and personal property, pursuant
● Board majority (in board meeting) and
to its lawful business;
● Ratified by 2/3 of OUTSTANDING
h. Enter into Partnership, joint venture, merger,
CAPITAL STOCK or members in a meeting
consolidation, or any other commercial
– mere written assent is not enough
agreement with natural and juridical persons;
i. Reasonable Donations for public welfare, Note: No extension may be made earlier than three
hospital, charitable, cultural, scientific, civil or (3) years prior to the original or subsequent expiry
similar purposes (Prohibited for foreign date(s) unless there are justifiable reasons for an
corporations: for partisan political activity; earlier extension as may be determined by the
j. Establish pension, retirement and other Plans Commission
for the benefit of directors, trustees, officers and
employees; and The extension of the corporate term shall take effect
k. Other powers essential or necessary to carry only on the day following the original or subsequent
out its purposes. expiry date(s).
m. Ultra Vires Doctrine funds to the prejudice of creditors is null and void.
(Boman Environmental Dev. Corp. v. Court of
Applicability of Ultra Vires Doctrine Appeals, G.R. No. 77860, 1988). This is without
An act not within the express or implied, and prejudice to the ability of a corporation to effect
incidental powers of the corporation. distributions to its stockholders by way of dividends
charged against unrestricted retained earnings.
Types of Ultra Vires Cases
a. First type: Acts done beyond the powers of the Coverage of the Trust Fund Doctrine
corporation as provided for in the law or its
articles of incorporation (Sec. 44) 1. In case of Solvency: The coverage of the trust
b. Second type: Acts or contracts entered into on fund doctrine is only up to the extent of the
behalf of the corporation by persons without “subscribed capital stock” of the corporation. In
corporate authority, even though the contract is this sense, the unrestricted retained earnings
within the powers of the corporation (Manila do not constitute part of the capital stock.
Metal Container Corp. v. PNB, G.R. No. Hence, the corporation is at liberty to pay out
166862, 2006) and assets to the stockholders by way of dividends
c. Third type: Acts or contracts, which are per se up to the extent of the unrestricted retained
illegal as being contrary to law. earnings.
Consequences of Ultra Vires Acts 2. In case of Insolvency: The trust fund doctrine
Executed contract – Courts will generally not set is not limited to reaching the stockholders’
aside or interfere with such contracts; unpaid subscriptions. The scope of the
Executory contracts – No enforcement even at the doctrine when the corporation is insolvent
suit of either party (void and unenforceable); encompasses not only the capital stock, but
Partly executed and partly executory – Principle also other property and assets generally
against unjust enrichment shall apply. regarded in equity as a trust fund for the
payment of corporate debts. Thus, the Trust
Ultra vires test: It is a question, therefore, in each Fund Doctrine extends to all assets (not just
case, of the logical relation of the act to the subscribed capital stock) when a corporation
corporate purpose expressed in the charter. If that becomes insolvent. (Halley v. Printwell, G.R.
act is one which is lawful in itself, and not otherwise No. 157549, 2011)
prohibited, is done for the purpose of serving
corporate ends, and is reasonably tributary to the 3. Releasing Subscribers: where the corporation
promotion of those ends, in a substantial, and not in released the subscribers to the capital stock
a remote and fanciful, sense, it may fairly be from their subscriptions without valuable
considered within charter powers. The test to be
consideration. (Ong Yong v. Tiu, G.R.
applied is whether the act in question is in direct and
No.144476, 2003)
immediate furtherance of the corporation’s
business, fairly incident to the express powers and
reasonably necessary to their exercise. If so, the 8. Stockholders and Members
corporation has the power to do it; otherwise, not.
(University of Mindanao, Inc. v. Bangko Sentral ng a. Fundamental Rights of a
Pilipinas, G.R. 194964-65, 2016) Stockholder
b. Participation in Management The regular courts now have the power to hear and
decide cases involving all matters and conduct of
(1) Proxy the elections of directors, including validation of
proxies. The power of SEC to regulate proxies
Section 57 of the Corporation Code provides that remains only in instances when stockholders vote
stockholders and members may vote in person or by on matters other than the election of directors (SEC
proxy in all meetings of stockholders or members. v. CA, G.R. No. 187702/189014, 2014).
2. Votes are received before the corporation Note: No dividends can be declared out of capital,
finishes the tally of votes. except liquidating dividends distributed at
dissolution.
Effect: A stockholder or member who participates
through remote communication or in absentia, shall (2) Appraisal Right
be deemed present for purposes of quorum.
The right to withdraw from the corporation and
The corporation shall establish the appropriate demand payment of the fair value of his shares after
requirements and procedures for voting through dissenting from certain corporate acts involving
remote communication and in absentia, taking into fundamental changes in corporate structure.
account the company’s scale, number of
shareholders or members, structure and other 1. When available
factors consistent with the basic right of corporate a. Extension or shortening of corporate term;
suffrage. (Sec. 36)
b. In case any amendment to the articles of
c. Proprietary Rights incorporation has the effect of changing or
restricting the rights of any stockholders or
(1) Rights to Dividends class of shares, or of authorizing
preferences in any respect superior to
The right to dividends vests at the time of its those of outstanding shares of any class;
declaration by the Board of Directors. (Sec. 80)
c. Investing of corporate funds for any
Although stock certificates grant the stockholder the
purpose other than the primary purpose;
right to receive quarterly dividends of 1%,
cumulative and participating, the stockholders do (Sec. 80)
not become entitled to the payment thereof without d. Sell or dispose all or substantially all
necessity of a prior declaration of dividends. assets of corporation;(Sec. 80)
(Republic Planters Bank v. Hon. Agana, Sr., G.R. e. Merger or consolidation.(Sec. 80)
No. 51765, 1997)
2. Manner of exercise of right (Sec 81, RCC)
No declaration of dividends can be valid if there are a. A written demand on the corporation within
no sufficient unrestricted retained earnings. 30 days after the vote was taken (failure to
do so means waiver);(Sec. 81)
Stock Corporations are prohibited from retaining b. From the time of demand, all rights
surplus profits in excess of 100% of their paid-in accruing to such shares including voting
capital stock, except: and dividend rights shall be suspended
1. When justified by definite corporate expansion except the right of such stockholder to
projects or programs approved by the board of receive payment of the fair value of
directors stockholder’s shares. (Sec. 82)
2. Corporation is prohibited under a loan c. Ten (10) days from demand, the
agreement from declaring dividends without the dissenting stockholder must submit his
creditor’s consent. certificates of stocks for notation that such
3. Under special circumstances such as when certificates represent dissenting shares.
there is a need for special reserve for probable (Sec. 85)
contingencies d. The price to be paid is the fair value of the
shares on the date the vote was taken;
Form of Dividends
(Sec. 81)
1. Cash Dividends (revocable before
e. The fair value shall be agreed upon by the
announcement).
corporation and the dissenting
2. Property Dividends (revocable before
stockholders within 60 days from the date
announcement).
the vote was taken. In case there is no
3. Stock Dividends, which requires, aside from the
agreement, the fair value shall be
declaration by the Board, the approval of 2/3 of
determined by a majority of the 3
the outstanding capital stock (revocable before
distinguished persons one of whom shall
issuance).
be named by the stockholder another by
the corporation and the third by the two
who were chosen; (Sec. 81)
f. The right of appraisal is extinguished transfer book (Yujuico v. Quiambao, G.R. No.
when: (Sec. 83) 180416, 2014)
i. He withdraws the demand with
the corporation’s consent; The corporate secretary is the officer who is duly
ii. The proposed action is authorized to make entries on the stock and transfer
abandoned; book (Gokongwei v. SEC, GR No. 45911, 1979).
iii. The SEC disapproves of such
All transfers of shares not entered in the stock and
action where approval is
transfer book of the corporation are invalid as to
necessary attaching or execution creditors of the assignors, as
iv. The SEC determines that such well as to the corporation and to subsequent
dissenting stockholder is not purchasers in good faith and to all persons
entitled to the appraisal right. interested, except the parties to such transfers: “All
g. If the dissenting stockholder is not paid transfers not so entered on the books of the
within 30 days from the award, he shall corporation are absolutely void; not because they
automatically be restored to all his rights as are without notice or fraudulent in law or fact, but
stockholder. (Sec. 82) because they are made so void by statute (Uson vs.
Diosomito, G.R. No. 42135, 1935).
(3) Right to Inspect
The entries are considered prima facie evidence
Records that can be inspected only and may be subject to proof to the contrary
Corporate records, regardless of the form in which (Bitong v. CA, G.R. No. 123553, 1998).
they are stored, shall be open to inspection by any
director, trustee, stockholder or member of the The stock and transfer book of the corporation
corporation in person or by a representative at cannot be used as the sole basis for determining the
reasonable hours on business days, and a demand quorum as it does not reflect the totality of shares
in writing may be made by such director, trustee or which have been subscribed, and more so when the
stockholder at their expense, for copies of such articles of incorporation show a significantly larger
records or excerpts from said records. (Sec. 73). amount of shares issued and outstanding as
compared to that listed in the stock and transfer
Also, a corporation shall furnish a stockholder or book (Lanuza v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 131394,
member, within 10 days from receipt of their written 2005).
request, its most recent financial statement (Sec.
74). Grounds for Not Allowing Inspection by a
Stockholder
The first three are the formulation of the old code. a. If the person demanding to examine the
Under the Revised Corporation Code, inspection records has improperly used any
rights covers a’’ “corporate records, regardless of information secured for prior examination,
the form in which they are stored” (see Sec. 73) b. He is not acting in good faith,
c. A requesting party who is not a stockholder
Stock and transfer book or member of record, or is a competitor
Record of: shall have no right to inspect or demand
1. All stocks in the names of the stockholders reproduction of corporate records. (Sec.
alphabetically arranged; 73)
2. The installment paid and unpaid on all stock for
which subscription has been made, and the Competitor- competitor, director, officer, controlling
date of payment of any installment; stockholder or otherwise represents the interests of
3. A statement of every alienation, sale or transfer a competitor shall have no right to inspect or
of stock made; and demand reproduction of corporate records. (Sec.
4. Such other entries as the by-laws may 73)
prescribe.
In one case, the Supreme Court clarified that the
Note: right of inspection may only be exercised by a
Section [73], while specific in the kinds of records stockholder of record. As such, the corporation may
that must be maintained, is not limiting, thus, the validly set up the defense in its refusal to grant a
inspection right is applicable to the stock and claim of the right of inspection on the ground that the
person is not a stockholder of record. (Puno v. Puno
Enterprises Inc., GR No. 177066, September 11, 3. The demand must be accompanied with
2009) statement of the purpose of the inspection,
which must show good faith or legitimate
In Terelay Investment and Development Corp. v. purpose.
Yulo, the court ruled that although the corporation 4. Illegitimate purposes include to obtain
may deny a stockholder's request to inspect corporate secrets (formula), nuisance suit,
corporate records, the corporation must show that
or to embarrass the company. (Africa v.
the purpose of the shareholder is improper by way
of defense. PCGG, G.R. No. 83831, 1992)
5. If the corporation or its officers contest such
The purposes held to justify a demand for purpose or contend that there is evil motive
inspection are the following: behind the inspection, the burden of proof
1. To ascertain the financial condition of the is with the corporation or such officer to
company or the propriety of dividends; show the same.
2. The value of the shares of stock for sale or 6. The RTC, and not the Sandiganbayan, has
investment; jurisdiction over a stockholder’s suit to
3. Whether there has been mismanagement; enforce its right to inspect under the
4. In anticipation of shareholders' meetings to Corporation Code where the case does not
obtain a mailing list of shareholders to involve a sequestration-related incident, but
solicit proxies or influence voting; an intra-corporate controversy (Abad v.
5. To obtain information in aid of litigation with
PHILCOMSAT, G.R. No. 200620, 2015)
the corporation or its officers as to
corporate transactions. 7. A stockholder’s right to inspect corporate
records subsists during the period of
The improper purposes which may warrant the liquidation (three year period for dissolution
denial of the right of inspection: per Sec. 145). (Chua v. SEC, G.R. No.
1. Obtaining of information as to business 216146, 2016)
secrets or to aid a competitor; 8. An action for injunction and, consequently,
2. To secure business "prospects" or a writ of preliminary injunction filed by a
investment or advertising lists; corporation is generally unavailable to
3. To find technical defects in corporate prevent stockholders from exercising their
transactions in order to bring "strike suits" right to inspection…[C]orporations may
for purposes of blackmail or extortion. raise their objections to the right
(Terelay Investment and Development
of inspection through affirmative defense in
Corp. v. Yulo, G.R. No. 160924, 2015)
an ordinary civil action for specific
The Right to Inspect Corporate Records is performance or damages, or through a
Subject to Confidentiality rules comment (if one is required) in a petition
The inspecting or reproducing party shall remain for mandamus. (Philippine Associated
bound by confidentiality rules under prevailing laws, Smelting and Refining Corp. v. Lim, G.R.
such as: No. 172948, 2016)
1. Trade secrets or processes under Republic
Act No. 8293, or the “Intellectual Property Remedies If Right to Inspect is Denied
Code of the Philippines”, as amended, a. Mandamus
2. Republic Act No. 10173, or the “Data Refusal to allow stockholders (or members of a non-
Privacy Act of 2012”, stock corporation) to examine books of the company
3. Republic Act No. 8799, or “The Securities is not a ground for appointing a receiver (or creating
a mgt. committee) since there are other adequate
Regulation Code”, and
remedies, such as mandamus. (Ao-as v. CA, G.R.
4. the Rules of Court. (Sec. 73) No. 128464, 2006)
Doctrinal Rulings on Right to Inspect b. Damages
1. The demand for inspection should cover Administrative Sanction (Sec. 158)
only reasonable hours on business days; Requisites for Section [158] to Apply (Ang-Abaya v.
2. The stockholder, member, director or Ang, G.R. no. 178511, 2008)
trustees demanding the right is one who
has not improperly used any information ● A director, trustee, stockholder or member has
secured through any previous examination made a prior demand in writing for a copy of
of the records;
excerpts from the corporations records or d. In case the right is denied in the Articles of
minutes; Incorporation;
● Any officer or agent of the concerned e. Waiver of the right by the stockholder;
corporation shall refuse to allow the said f. If the shares of a corporation are offered and not
director, trustee, stockholder or member of the subscribed and purchased by the stockholders,
corporation to examine and copy said excerpts; and the shares are being offered again, there is
● If refusal is made per a resolution or order of the no pre-emptive right with respect to the latter
board of directors or trustees, the liability under offer of shares (Benito v. SEC, G.R. No. L-
this section for such action shall be imposed 56655, 1983)
upon the directors or trustees who voted for
refusal; Right of First Refusal
● Where the officer or agent of the corporation The right of first refusal provides that a stockholder
sets up the defense that the person demanding who may wish to sell or assign his shares must first
to examine and copy excerpts from the offer the shares to the corporation or to the existing
corporation’s records and minutes has stockholders of the corporation, under terms and
conditions which are reasonable; and that only when
improperly used any information secured
the corporation or the other stockholders do not or
through any prior examination of the records or fail to exercise their option, is the offering
minutes of such corporation or of any other stockholder at liberty to dispose of his shares to third
corporation, or was not acting in good faith or parties.
for a legitimate purpose in making his demand,
the contrary must be shown or proved. Pre-Emptive Right v. Right of First Refusal
● The person demanding to examine has PRE-EMPTIVE RIGHT OF FIRST
improperly used any information secured RIGHT REFUSAL
through any prior examination of the records or Generally may be Arises only by virtue of
minutes of such corporation or for any other exercised, subject to contractual
corporation; and limitations in stipulations or by law
● The one requesting to inspect was not acting in Corporation Code
good faith or for a legitimate purpose in making Covers unissued Covers shares already
his demand shares offered for issued
subscriptions
c. Criminal sanctions under Sec. 161 May be exercised by Can only be exercised
refer to discussion at the respective topic below mere trustees or by the owner and not
conservators mere trustee or
(4) Preemptive Right (Republic v. conservator, since it is
Sandiganbayan, G.R. an act of ownership
The shareholders’ right to subscribe to all issues or No. 107789, 2003) (Republic v.
dispositions of shares of any class in proportion to Sandiganbayan, G.R.
his present stockholdings, the purpose being to No. 107789, 2003)
enable the shareholder to retain his proportionate Right claimed against Right exercisable
control in the corporation and to retain his equity in the Corporation, against the seller-
the surplus. where the stockholder stockholder
must pay
Instances When Preemptive Right Is Not
Available Note:
a. Shares to be issued to comply with laws A corporation has no power to prevent or restrain
requiring stock offering or minimum stock transfers of its shares, unless such power is
expressly conferred in the Articles of Incorporation
ownership by the public;
or the law. (Fleischer v. Botica Nolasco Co., G.R.
b. Shares issued in good faith with approval of the No. L-23241, 1925)
stockholders representing 2/3 of the
outstanding capital stock in exchange for A provision in the by-laws granting the right of first
property needed for corporate purposes; refusal (and therefore, restrains trade) is void and
c. Shares issued in good faith with approval of the does not bind third parties (Fleischer v. Botica
stockholders representing 2/3 of the Nolasco Co., G.R. No. L-23241, 1925)
outstanding capital stock issued in payment of
previously contracted debts;
By-laws are intended merely for the protection of the 3. Under special circumstances such as when
corporation and prescribe relation, not restriction; there is a need for special reserve for probable
they are always subject to the charter of the contingencies
corporation. (Rural Bank of Salinas v. CA, G.R. No.
96674, 1992) Form of Dividends
1. Cash Dividends (revocable before
(5) Right to Vote announcement).
2. Property Dividends (revocable before
The right to vote is given to the shareholders but can
announcement).
be limited if stipulated in the Articles of Incorporation
3. Stock Dividends, which requires, aside from the
and the Certificate of Stock.
declaration by the Board, the approval of 2/3 of
However, holders of nonvoting shares shall the outstanding capital stock (revocable before
nevertheless be entitled to vote on the following issuance).
matters:
(a) Amendment of the articles of incorporation Note: No dividends can be declared out of capital,
(b) Adoption and amendment of bylaws; except liquidating dividends distributed at
(c) Sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, dissolution.
or other disposition of all or substantially all
of the corporate property; Other Rights
(d) Incurring, creating, or increasing bonded ● Right to issuance of stock certificate for
indebtedness; fully paid shares - Under Section 64 of the
(e) Increase or decrease of authorized capital Corporation Code, no certificate of stock shall
stock; be issued to a subscriber until the full amount of
(f) Merger or consolidation of the corporation his subscription together with interest and
with another corporation or other expenses (in case of delinquent shares), if any
corporations; is due, has been paid. A subscriber must first
(g) Investment of corporate funds in another totally pay his subscription before a certificate
corporation or business in accordance with
of stock covering shares subscribed and paid
this Code; and
(h) Dissolution of the corporation for could be issued to him. But an unpaid
subscription (not declared delinquent) can be
(6) Right to Dividends voted upon in corporate meetings. Such
delinquent shares are also entitled to dividends,
The right to dividends vests at the time of its subject to the rules set forth in Section 43 of the
declaration by the Board of Directors. Corporation Code on delinquent shares.
Although stock certificates grant the stockholder the Nevertheless, Section 64 does not prohibit the
right to receive quarterly dividends of 1%, corporation from “dividing” the subscription of a
cumulative and participating, the stockholders do subscriber by considering portion thereof as fully
not become entitled to the payment thereof without paid and issuing a corresponding certificate over the
necessity of a prior declaration of dividends. paid- up shares. Thus, in the absence of provisions
(Republic Planters Bank v. Hon. Agana, Sr., G.R. in the by- laws to the contrary, a corporation may
No. 51765, 1997) apply payments made by subscribers on account of
their subscriptions either as:
No declaration of dividends can be valid if there are 1. Full payment for the corresponding
no sufficient unrestricted retained earnings. number of shares, the par value of which is
covered by such payment; or
Stock Corporations are prohibited from retaining 2. Payment pro rata to each and all the entire
surplus profits in excess of 100% of their paid-in number of shares subscribed for
capital stock, except:
1. When justified by definite corporate expansion Once an alternative is chosen, it must be applied
projects or programs approved by the board of uniformly to all stockholders similarly situated, and
directors therefore, it cannot be changed without the consent
2. Corporation is prohibited under a loan of all stockholders who might be affected.
agreement from declaring dividends without the
creditor’s consent. ● Proportionate participation in the
distribution of assets in liquidation
4. requirements and procedures for nomination The petitioning stockholders / member shall preside
and in case the meeting is for election of until at least a majority of stockholders/ members
directors. (Sec. 50) present have chosen a presiding officer. (Sec 49).
i. on a similar demand, the yeas and nays board and its committees and in regular or
must be taken on any motion or special stockholder meetings;
proposition, and a record thereof carefully h. Appraisals and performance reports for the
made. board and the criteria and procedure for
j. the protest of any director, trustee, assessment;
stockholder or member on any action or i. A director or trustee compensation report
proposed action must be recorded in full j. Director disclosures on self-dealings and
upon their. (Sec. 75) related party transactions; and/or
k. The profiles of directors nominated or
The signing of the minutes by all the members of the seeking election or reelection.
board is not required—there is no provision in the
Corporation Code that requires that the minutes of 9. Board of Directors and Trustees
the meeting should be signed by all the members of
the board. The signature of the corporate secretary a. Repository of Corporate
gives the minutes of the meeting probative value Powers
and credibility (People v. Dumlao, G.R. No. 168918,
2009). Doctrine of Centralized Management
Unless otherwise provided in this Code, the board
The entries contained in the minutes are prima facie of directors or trustees shall exercise the corporate
evidence of what actually took place during the powers, conduct all business, and control all
meeting, pursuant to Section 44, Rule 130 of the properties of the corporation (Sec. 22).
Revised Rule on Evidence (People v. Dumlao, G.R.
No. 168918, 2009). Powers of the Board of Directors
General Rule: The Board of Directors alone
Resolution vs. Minutes Of The Meeting exercises the powers of the corporation.
(People v. Dumlao, G.R. No. 168918, 2009) Exceptions: Other persons or groups within the
RESOLUTION MINUTES OF THE corporation may do so similarly:
MEETING a) If (1) there is a management contract and
A formal action by a A brief statement not (2) powers are delegated by majority of the
corporate board of only of what transpired board to an executive committee;
directors or other at a meeting, usually b) Corporate officers (e.g. the President) via
corporate body of authority from (1) law, (2) corporate by-
authorizing a particular stockholders/members laws; and (3) authorization from the board,
act, transaction, or or directors/trustees, either expressly or impliedly by habit,
appointment but also at a meeting custom or acquiescence in the general
of an executive course of business;
committee c) A corporate agent in transactions with third
persons to the extent of the authority to do
Agenda of meetings (Sec. 49) so has been conferred upon him;
At each regular meeting of stockholders or d) Those with apparent authority (doctrine of
members, the board of directors or trustees shall apparent authority).
endeavor to present to stockholders or members the
following: Theories on Source of Board Power
a. The minutes of the most recent regular a) Directly-Vested / Original Power Pursuant
meeting to Section 22, the source of power of the
b. A members’ list for non-stock corporations Board of Directors is primarily and directly-
and, for stock corporations, material vested by law; it is not a delegated power
information on the current stockholders, from the stockholders or members of the
and their voting rights; corporation
c. A detailed, descriptive, balanced and b) Delegated Powers from Stockholders The
comprehensible assessment of the Board of Directors is a creation of the
corporation’s performance, stockholders and controls and directs the
d. A financial report for the preceding year, affairs of the corporation by delegation of
e. An explanation of the dividend policy and the stockholders. By drawing to themselves
the fact of payment of dividends the powers of the corporation, they occupy
f. Director or trustee profiles positions of trusteeship in relation to the
g. A director or trustee attendance report, stockholders.
indicating the attendance of each director
or trustee at each of the meetings of the
Doctrine of Ratification lot to Efren but eventually notified the latter about
The corporation may ratify the unauthorized acts of the rescission of lease. Using the Doctrine of
its corporate officer. The substance of the doctrine Apparent Authority, Bonanza was estopped from
is confirmation after conduct, amounting to a denying the existence and enforceability of Lease
substitute for a prior authority. Ratification can be Contract after it effectively ratified the lease by
made either expressly or impliedly like silence or accepting proceeds throughout several years. Also,
acquiescence and acceptance of benefits (Yasuma while it is true that the doctrine cannot be invoked by
v. Heirs of Cecilio De Villa, G.R. No. 150350, 2006). one who is not a third party, an officer of a
But illegal acts cannot be ratified. corporation can actually be a third person in contract
with the corporation. (Quesada, et al. v. Bonanza
Doctrine of Apparent Authority Restaurants, Inc., G.R. No. 207500, 2016)
If a corporation knowingly permits one of its officers,
or any other agent, to act within the scope of an b. Tenure, Qualifications, and
apparent authority, it holds him out to the public Disqualifications of Directors
possessing the power to so do those acts; and thus,
the corporation will, as against anyone who has in Term of Office (Sec. 22)
good faith dealt with it through such agent, be • Directors shall be elected for a term of one
estopped from denying the agent’s authority. (1) year from among the holders of stocks
(Francisco v. GSIS, G.R. No. L- 18287, 1963) registered in the corporation’s books
• Trustees shall be elected for a term not
Apparent authority may be ascertained through: exceeding three (3) years from among the
a. The general manner in which the corporation members of the corporation.
holds out an officer or agent as having the
power to act or, in other words, the apparent Each director/trustee shall hold office until the
authority to act in general, with which it clothes successor is elected and qualified.
him; or
b. The acquiescence in his acts of a particular Qualifications of Directors
nature, with actual or constructive knowledge a. Must own at least one (1) share of the capital
thereof, whether within or beyond the scope of stock of the corporation in his own name or
his ordinary powers. must be a member in the case of non-stock
corporations
If a private corporation intentionally or negligently
• Any director who ceases to be the owner of
clothes its officers or agents with apparent power to
at least one (1) share of the capital stock of
perform acts for it, the corporation will be estopped
the corporation of which he is a director
to deny that the apparent authority is real as to
shall thereby cease to be a director. (Sec.
innocent third persons dealing in good faith with
22)
such officers or agents.
b. He must not be disqualified under the RCC
(Sec. 26)
Note: It requires presentation of evidence of similar
c. He must possess other qualifications as may be
acts executed either in its favor or in favor of other
prescribed in the by-laws of the corporation.
parties. It is not the quantity of similar acts which
(Gokongwei, Jr. v. SEC, G.R. No. L-45911,
establishes apparent authority, but the vesting of a
1979)
corporate officer with the power to bind the
d. He must be of legal age
corporation (People’s Aircargo and Warehousing
Co., Inc. v. CA., G.R. No. 117847, 1998).
Disqualifications of Directors, Trustees, or
Officers (Sec. 26)
When the officers or agents of a corporation exceed
A person shall be disqualified from being a director,
their powers in entering into contracts or doing other
trustee, or officer of any corporation if, within five (5)
acts, the corporation, when it has knowledge
years prior to the election or appointment as such,
thereof, must promptly disaffirm the contract or act
the person was:
and allow the other party or third persons to act in
a) Convicted by final judgment:
the belief that it was authorized or has been ratified.
i. Of an offense punishable by
If it acquiesces, with knowledge of the facts, or fails
imprisonment for a period
to disaffirm, ratification will be implied or else it will
exceeding six (6) years;
be estopped to deny ratification (Premiere
ii. For violating this Code; and
Development Bank vs. CA, G.R. No. 159352, 2004).
iii. For violating “The Securities
Efren was Bonanza’s General Property Manager
Regulation Code”;
while Miguel was the President. Bonanza leased the
elected but may not cast more than one communication or in absentia. The right to vote
vote for one candidate. (In straight voting, through such modes may be exercised in
the votes are spread out evenly among all corporations vested with public interest,
the elective positions) notwithstanding the absence of a provision in the by-
2. Cumulative voting for one candidate – a laws of such corporations. (sec. 23)
stockholder may accumulate his shares
and give one candidate as many votes as Who Elects Directors or Trustees
the number of directors to be elected 1. By the stockholders/members as
multiplied by the number of his shares shall provided in the by-laws (traditionally during
equal; annual SH/M meetings
3. Cumulative voting by distribution – a 2. By the board, if still constituting quorum for
stockholder may also cumulate his shares vacancies in the interim (i.e. between
by multiplying the number of his shares by annual meetings) due to causes other than
the number of directors to be elected and removal or expiry of term (Sec. 28)
distribute the same among as many 3. If the vacancies are due to removal or
candidates as he shall see fit expiry of term, the directors/trustees must
be elected by the stockholders/members
Methods of Voting in Relation to Type of at a meeting for this purpose (special
Corporation meeting)
a. Stock Corporations
Stockholders entitled to vote shall have the right to How Elected
vote the number of shares of stock standing in their 1. By owners of majority of outstanding capital
own names in the stock books of the corporation at stock or by members in annual
the time fixed in the bylaws or where the bylaws are stockholders’/members’ meeting
silent, at the time of the election 2. Stockholders/members may be present in
person or by written proxy
The stockholder may use: 3. For stock corporations: Number of votes =
1. Straight Voting (no. of shares) x (no. of directors to be
2. Cumulative voting for one candidate elected)
3. Cumulative voting by distribution 4. By straight voting or cumulative voting,
which is all votes may be cast for a
Note: The total number of votes cast shall not candidate or distributed among the
exceed the number of shares owned by the candidates
stockholders as shown in the books of the 5. For non-stock corporations: Unless
corporation multiplied by the whole number of otherwise provided in the articles of
directors to be elected; and that no delinquent stock incorporation or in the by-laws, members of
shall be voted. non-stock corporations may cast as many
votes as there are trustees to be elected but
b) Non-stock Corporations may not cast more than one vote for one
General Rule: Members of nonstock corporations candidate.
may use Straight Voting, i.e. cast as many votes as 6. Viva voce (live voice) or must be by ballot if
there are trustees to be elected but may not cast requested
more than one (1) vote for one (1) candidate. 7. Delinquent shares and treasury shares
Exception: Unless otherwise provided in the cannot vote
articles of incorporation or in the bylaws. (Sec. 23) 8. Candidates with highest number of votes
will be declared elected
Quorum
At all elections of directors or trustees, there must Election Rules on Stock and Non-Stock
be present, either in person or through a Corporations
representative authorized to act by written proxy: STOCK NON-STOCK
• Stock Corporation – owners majority of CORPORATIONS CORPORATIONS
outstanding capital stock Owners of a majority A majority of the
• Non-stock Corporation – majority of of outstanding capital members, either in
members entitled to vote stock, either in person person or by
or by representative representative
Note: When so authorized in the bylaws or by a authorized to act by authorized to act by
majority of the board of directors, the stockholders written proxy, must be written proxy, must be
or members may also vote through remote
present at the election present at the election be later than sixty (60) days from the scheduled
of the directors of the trustees date.
Cumulative voting or Cumulative voting is If no new date has been designated, or if the
Straight voting can be not available, unless rescheduled election is likewise not held, the SEC
used; a matter of right allowed by the articles may, upon the application of a stockholder, member,
granted by law to each or by-laws. director or trustee, and after verification of the
stockholder with voting unjustified non-holding of the election, summarily
rights. The Board may be order that an election be held.
elected by region.
Directors are elected The SEC shall have the power to issue such orders
at large. as may be appropriate, including:
a) orders directing the issuance of a notice
Alien Membership in Board of Directors stating the time and place of the election,
P.D. No. 715: “election of aliens as members of the b) designated presiding officer, and
board of directors of governing body of corporations c) the record date or dates for the
or associations engaging in partially nationalized determination of stockholders or members
activity shall be allowed in proportion to their entitled to vote.
allowable participation or share in the capital of such
entities.” Notwithstanding any provision of the articles of
incorporation or bylaws to the contrary, the shares
Non-Filipino citizens may become members of the of stock or membership represented at such
board of directors of a bank to the extent of the meeting and entitled to vote shall constitute a
foreign participation in the equity of said bank. quorum for purposes of conducting an election
(General Banking Law, Sec. 15) under this section. (Sec. 25)
directors or trustees who, with knowledge of the b) The action by the designated director or
disqualification, failed to remove such director or trustee shall be limited to the emergency
trustee. action necessary,
The term shall cease within a reasonable
f. Filling of Vacancies (Sec. 28) time from the termination of the emergency
or upon election of the replacement director
General Rule: Any vacancy in the board are filled or trustee, whichever comes earlier.
by the remaining directors. c) The corporation must notify the SEC within
three (3) days from the creation of the
Exception: Vacancy arises by removal or expiration emergency board, stating therein the
of the term, in which case a meeting is required reason for its creation.
wherein the stockholders or members will elect the
replacement. Vacancy filled by reason of an increase in
the number of directors or trustees
Replacement director or trustee – A director or This vacancy shall be filled only by an election
trustee elected to fill a vacancy and shall serve only at a regular or at a special meeting of
for the unexpired term of the predecessor in office. stockholders or members duly called for the
purpose, or in the same meeting authorizing the
How Elections should be held: increase of directors or trustees if so stated in
In all elections to fill vacancies under this section, the notice of the meeting.
the procedure set forth in Sections 23 and 25 of this
Code shall apply. g. Compensation (Sec. 30)
When Elections may be held: General Rule: In the absence of any provision in the
a) Due to term expiration- the election shall be by-laws fixing their compensation, the directors shall
held no later than the day of such expiration at not receive any compensation, as such
a meeting called for that purpose. Exception: They may receive reasonable per
b) Result of removal- the election may be held on diems [i.e. at meetings]
the same day of the meeting authorizing the
removal and this fact must be so stated in the Qualifiers to General Rule and Exception
agenda and notice of said meeting. Any such compensation other than per diems may
c) In all other cases, the election must be held no be granted to directors by the vote of the
later than forty-five (45) days from the time the stockholders representing at least a majority of the
vacancy arose. outstanding capital stock at a regular or special
stockholders’ meeting.
Vacancy NOT by removal or expiration of term
May be filled by: However: In no case shall the total yearly
a) the vote of at least a majority of the compensation of directors, as such directors,
remaining directors or trustees, if still exceed 10% percent of the net income before
constituting a quorum; income tax of the corporation during the preceding
b) if not, said vacancies must be filled by the year.
stockholders or members in a regular or Directors or trustees shall not participate in the
special meeting called for that purpose. determination of their own per diems or
compensation.
Cases when Emergency Action is Required
Requirements: NOTE: The implication of the phrase “as such
a) If the vacancy prevents the remaing directors” is that members of the Board may receive
directors from constituting a quorum compensation, in addition to reasonable per diems,
b) emergency action is required to prevent when they render services to the corporation in a
grave, substantial, and irreparable loss or capacity other than as directors or trustees [in this
damage to the corporation case, if serving as corporate officers] (Western
Technology v. Salas, G.R. No. 113032, 1997)
Effects:
a) The vacancy may be temporarily filled from For Corporations vested with public interest
among the officers of the corporation by These corporations shall submit to their
unanimous vote of the remaining directors shareholders and the SEC, an annual report of the
or trustees. total compensation of each of their directors or
trustees.
1. Duty of Obedience (Basis: Sec. 24) Exception: The act of the director has been ratified
To direct the affairs of the corporation only in by a vote of the stockholders owning or representing
accordance with the purposes for which it was at least two-thirds (2/3) of the outstanding capital
organized stock.
2. Duty of Loyalty (Basis: Secs. 30 & 33) Violations of Secs. 30 and 33 are not penal
Directors or trustees shall not acquire any personal offenses in relation Sec. 158: Had the Legislature
or pecuniary interest in conflict with their duty as intended to attach penal sanctions to said sections,
such directors or trustees. it could have expressly stated such intent in the
same manner it did for Section 74 of the same Code
Disloyalty: Sec. 30(2) v. Sec. 33 that the violation thereof is likewise considered an
SEC. 30(2) SEC. 33 offense under Section 144. (Ient v. Tullet, Inc., G.R.
Applicable to directors, Applicable to directors No. 189158, 2016)
trustees, and officers only
i. Business Judgment Rule
No ratification allowed Allows ratification of a
transaction by the Questions of policy or management are left solely to
director the honest decision of officers and directors of a
Covers stock and non- Covers stock corporation and the courts are without authority to
stock corporations corporations only substitute their judgment for the judgment of the
board of directors; the board is the business
manager of the corporation and so long as it acts in
3. Duty of Diligence (Basis: Sec. 30) good faith its orders are not reviewable by the courts
Directors and/or trustees shall not willfully and or the SEC. The directors are also not liable to the
knowingly vote for or assent to patently unlawful stockholders in performing such acts (Philippine
acts of the corporation or act in bad faith or with Stock Exchange, Inc. v. CA, GR No. 130644, 1997).
gross negligence in directing the affairs of the
corporation. Coverage of the Rule: Two Branches
1. Resolutions and transactions entered into by
Doctrine of Corporate Opportunity the Board of Directors within the powers of the
If there is presented to a corporate officer or director corporation cannot be reversed by the courts
a business opportunity, which the corporation has not even on the behest of the stockholders of
an interest or a reasonable expectancy, the self- the corporation; and
interest of the officer or director will be brought into 2. Directors and officers acting within such
conflict with that of his corporation. The law does not business judgment cannot be held personally
permit him to seize the opportunity even if he will liable for the consequences of such acts.
use his own funds in the venture. If he seizes the
opportunity thereby obtaining profits to the expense j. Solidary Liabilities for Damages
of the corporation, he must account all the profits by
refunding the same to the corporation. Liability under Sec. 30(1)
The following shall be liable jointly and severally for
Requisites of Doctrine of Corporate all damages resulting therefrom suffered by the
Opportunity corporation, its stockholders or members and other
1. The Corporation is financially able to persons.
undertake the business opportunity.
2. From the nature of the business Directors or trustees who willfully and knowingly:
opportunity, it is in line with the a) vote for or assent to patently unlawful acts
corporation’s business and is of practical of the corporation
advantage to the corporation. b) are guilty of gross negligence or bad faith in
directing the affairs of the corporation
c) acquire any personal or pecuniary interest General rule: The Board being generally a policy-
in conflict with their duty as such directors making body, directors as such cannot be held liable
or trustees under a criminal statute making those in charge of
the management of the corporation liable for the
Liability for Watered Stocks criminal acts done in pursuit of corporate operations.
Directors or officers consenting to issuance of The members of the Board generally do not concern
watered stocks are solidarily liable with the themselves with the day-to-day affairs of the
stockholder concerned, to the corporation or its corporation, except those corporate officers who are
creditors for the difference between the fair value charged with the running of the business of the
received (by the corporation at the time of the corporation and are concomitantly members of the
issuance) and the par or issued value of the stock Board, like the President. (Federated Dealers Assn.
issued. (Sec. 64) v. Del Rosario, G.R. No. 202639, 2016).
Because they are vested with public interest, the b. Redeemable shares – Expressly provided
following types of corporations may only issue in articles; may be purchased/taken up
par value shares: upon expiration of the period of said shares
a. Banks purchased whether or not there are
b. Trust Companies unrestricted retained earnings; may be
c. Insurance Companies deprived of voting rights.
d. Public Utilities c. Treasury stocks – stocks previously
e. Building and Loan Associations. issued and fully paid for and reacquired by
the corporation through lawful means
iii. Voting and Non- Voting Shares (purchase, donation, etc.); not entitled to
● Voting share with complete voting rights vote and no dividends could be declared
● Non - voting shares are preferred or thereon as corporations cannot declare
redeemable shares that have limited voting dividends to itself.
rights.
Escrow shares – those held by a third person to be
Non-Voting Shares Have Voting Rights In The released only upon the performance of a condition
Following Matters: or the happening of a certain event contained in the
a. Amendment of Articles agreement.
b. Adoption/ Amendment of By- Laws
c. Sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge or Preferred cumulative participating share of
dispose of all or substantially all of corporate stock - Share entitling its holder to preference in
property the payment of dividends ahead of common
d. Incur, create, increase bonded indebtedness stockholders and to be paid the dividends due for
e. Increase, decrease capital stock prior years and to participate further with common
f. Merger/ consolidation with another corporation stockholders in dividend declarations.
g. Investment of funds in another corporation
Over-Issued Stock – Stock issued in excess of
h. Dissolution of corporation
authorized capital stock; null and void
Other Classes of Shares: (Secs. 7, 8, 9)
(1) Nature of the Certificate
a. Founder’s shares – Given rights and
(Sec. 62)
privileges not enjoyed by owners of other
stocks; exclusive right to vote/be voted in A stock certificate is a written instrument signed by
the election of directors shall not exceed 5 the proper corporate officers stating or
years. acknowledging that the person named in the
document is the owner of a designated number of
Note: such exclusive right shall not be allowed if its shares of its stock. (Lao v. Lao, G.R. No. 170585,
exercise will violate the “Anti-Dummy Law”; the 2008)
“Foreign Investments Act of 1991”; and other
pertinent laws. A stock certificate is not necessary to render one a
shareholder in a corporation; nevertheless, it is the
Since Section 7 makes no distinction (and is found paper representative or tangible evidence of the
under General Provisions), then it must mean that share itself and the various interests therein. The
founders’ shares may be applied to both stock and stock certificate expresses the contract between the
nonstock corporations. Although [Section 88 of the corporation and the shareholder, but it is not
Revised Corporation Code] allows in a nonstock essential to the existence of a share in or the
corporation to limit, broaden or deny the right of creation of the relationship with the shareholder.
members of any class, the specific provision of (Tan v. SEC, G.R. No. 95696, 1992)
Section 7 to founders’ share must prevail, and that
the nonstock corporation can lawfully suspend or A stock certificate could not be considered issued in
define the voting rights of its members, but with contemplation of law unless signed by the president
respect to founders’ share, the exclusive right to or vice-president and countersigned by the
vote and be voted for of the founders’ share should secretary or assistance secretary. (Bitong v. Court
expire after five years from the approval of the SEC. of Appeals, G.R. No. 102726, 1994)
(Forest Hills and Country Club, Inc. v. Kings
Properties Corp., G.R. No. 212833, 2019).
Certificates of stock are not the actual shares of (3) Negotiability; Requirements
stock in the corporation and merely expresses the for Valid Transfer of Stocks
contract between the corporation and the
shareholder. Therefore, when a buyer of shares Quasi-Negotiable Character of Certificate of
gives notice to original seller for the latter’s exercise Stock
of his right of first refusal and the original seller failed A stock certificate is merely a quasi-negotiable
to respond, there was already the valid offer by the instrument in the sense that it may be transferred by
buyer that triggered the running of the period for the endorsement, coupled with delivery; but it is not
exercise of the right of first refusal in spite of the fact negotiable because the holder thereof takes it
that no certificate of stock had been issued yet in the without prejudice to such rights or defenses as the
name of the buyer. (Makati Sports Club v. Cheng, registered owners or transferor’s creditors may have
G.R. No. 178523, 2010) under the law, except only insofar as such rights or
defenses are subject to the limitations imposed by
The shares evidenced by said certificates, the principles governing estoppel. (Delos Santos v.
meanwhile, are regarded as property and the owner Republic, G.R. No. L-4818, 1955)
of such shares may, as a general rule, dispose of
them as he sees fit, unless the corporation has been The rule is that the endorsement of the stock
dissolved, or unless the right to do so is properly certificate by the owner or his attorney-in-fact or any
restricted, or the owner's privilege of disposing of his other person legally authorized to make the transfer
shares has been hampered by his own action. (Teng shall be sufficient to effect the transfer of shares only
v. SEC, G.R. No. 184332, 2016) if the same is coupled with delivery. The delivery of
the stock certificate duly endorsed by the owner is
(2) Uncertificated Shares (Sec. the operative act of transfer of shares from the lawful
62) owner to the new transferee.
But to be valid against third parties, the transfer
The Commission may require corporations whose must be recorded in the corporate books. (Bitong v.
securities are traded in trading markets, and which Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 102726, 1994)
can reasonably demonstrate their capability to do so
to issue their securities or shares of stocks in Since physical delivery of stock certificates is one of
uncertificated or scripless form in accordance with the essential requisites for the transfer of ownership
the rules of the Commission. of the stocks purchased, then the failure of the
seller-registered owner to deliver the stock
Defined as security evidenced by electronic or certificates would constitute a material breach that
similar records. (Securities and Regulation Code, warrants the rescission of the sale of the shares
Sec. 3.14) upon the option of the buyer. (Fil-Estate Golf v.
Vertex Sales and Trading, G.R. No. 202079, 2013)
Note: Under Sec. 43.1 of the Securities and
Regulation Code, a corporation whose shares of (4) Issuance (Sec. 63)
stock are registered pursuant to the Corporation
Code or listed in a stock exchange may: No certificate of stock shall be issued to a subscriber
a. If so resolved by its Board of Directors and until the full amount of the subscription together with
agreed by a shareholder, issue shares to, or interest and expenses (in case of delinquent
record the transfer of some or all of its shares shares), if any is due, has been paid.
into the name of said shareholders, investors or,
securities intermediary in the form of Lost or Destroyed Certificates (Sec. 72)
uncertificated securities; The following procedure shall be followed by a
b. The use of uncertificated securities shall be corporation in issuing new certificates of stock in lieu
without prejudice to the rights of the securities of those which have been lost, stolen or destroyed:
intermediary subsequently to require the a. The registered owner of a certificate of stock in
corporation to issue a certificate in respect of a corporation or such person’s legal
any shares recorded in its name; and representative shall file with the corporation an
c. If so provided in its articles of incorporation and affidavit in triplicate setting forth, if possible, the
by-laws, issue all of the shares of a particular i. circumstances as to how the certificate
class in the form of uncertificated securities and was lost, stolen or destroyed,
subject to a condition that investors may not ii. the number of shares represented by
require the corporation to issue a certificate in such certificate,
respect of any shares recorded in their name. iii. the serial number of the certificate and
the name of the corporation which issued
the same.
iv. The owner of such certificate of stock While Sec. 72 of RCC appears to be mandatory, the
shall also submit such other information same admits exceptions, such that a corporation
and evidence as may be deemed may voluntarily issue a new certificate in lieu of the
necessary; and original stock certificate which has been lost without
b. After verifying the affidavit and other information complying with the requirements under said section.
and evidence with the books of the corporation, It would be an internal matter for the corporation to
the corporation shall publish a notice in a find measures in ascertaining who are the real
newspaper of general circulation in the place owners of shares for purposes of liquidation. It is
where the corporation has its principal office, well-settled that unless proven otherwise, the “stock
once a week for three (3) consecutive weeks at and transfer book” is the best evidence to establish
the expense of the registered owner of the stock ownership.
certificate of stock which has been lost, stolen
or destroyed. The notice shall state (5) Stock and Transfer Book
i. the name of the corporation,
ii. the name of the registered owner, 1. Contents
iii. the serial number of the certificate, Stock corporations must keep a stock and transfer
iv. the number of shares represented by book, which shall contain a record of:
such certificate, and 1. All stocks in the names of the stockholders
v. shall state that after the expiration of one alphabetically arranged;
(1) year from the date of the last 2. The installments paid and unpaid on all
publication, stock for which subscription has been
c. if no contest has been presented to the made, and the date of payment of any
corporation regarding the certificate of stock, installment;
the 3. A statement of every alienation, sale or
i. right to make such contest shall be transfer of stock made; and
barred and the corporation shall cancel 4. Such other entries as the by-laws may
the lost, destroyed or stolen certificate of prescribe. (Sec. 73)
stock in its books.
ii. In lieu thereof, the corporation shall issue Only absolute transfers of shares of stock are
a new certificate of stock, unless the required to be recorded in the corporation’s stock
registered owner files a bond or other and transfer book in order to have force and effect
security as may be required, effective for as against third persons. Attachments of shares are
a period of one (1) year, for such amount not “transfers” and need not be recorded in the
and in such form and with such sureties corporation’s stock and transfer book. (Ferro
as may be satisfactory to the board of Chemicals v. Garcia, et al., G.R. 168134, 2016)
directors, in which case a new certificate
may be issued even before the expiration 2. Who May Make Valid Entries
of the one (1) year period provided Only the corporate secretary is duly authorized to
herein. make entries on the stock and transfer book. Hence,
entries made by the Chairman or the President are
d. If a contest has been presented to the invalid. (Torres Jr. v. CA, G.R. No. 120138, 1997).
corporation or if an action is pending in court
regarding the ownership of the certificate of Registration of a transfer of shares of stock is a
stock which has been lost, stolen or destroyed, ministerial duty on the part of the corporation.
the issuance of the new certificate of stock in Aggrieved parties may then resort to the remedy of
lieu thereof shall be suspended until the court mandamus to compel corporations that wrongfully
renders a final decision regarding the or unjustifiably refuse to record the transfer or to
ownership of the certificate of stock which has issue new certificates of stock. This remedy is
been lost, stolen or destroyed. available even upon the instance of a bona fide
transferee who is able to establish a clear legal right
Except in case of fraud, bad faith, or negligence on to the registration of the transfer. (Andaya v. Rural
the part of the corporation and its officers, no action Bank of Cabadbaran, Inc., G.R. No. 188769, 2016)
may be brought against any corporation which shall
have issued certificate of stock in lieu of those lost, 3. Stock transfer agents
stolen or destroyed pursuant to the procedure A stock transfer agent or one engaged principally in
above-described. the business of registering transfers of stocks on
behalf of a stock corporation. (Sec. 75)
Exception (SEC Opinion 28 Jan. 1999)
A stock transfer agent shall be allowed to operate in (1) Call by Board of Directors
the Philippines upon compliance with the following:
1. securing a license from the SEC The board of directors may, at any time, declare due
(renewable annually) and payable to the corporation unpaid subscriptions
2. payment of a fee fixed by the SEC and may collect the same or such percentage
thereof, in either case, with accrued interest, if any,
(6) Situs of the Shares of Stock as it may deem necessary.
Situs of shares is the domicile of the corporation that Requisites for a valid call
issued them. (Wells Fargo Bank and Union v. 1. Must be made in the manner prescribed by
Collector, G.R. No. L-46720, 1940) law;
2. Must be made by the Board of Directors;
b. Watered Stocks and
3. Must operate uniformly upon all
(1) Definition shareholders
Watered stocks are issued for less than the par Note: A call is not necessary in two cases
value or issued value or for a consideration other 1. when the date of payment is specified in
than cash, valued in excess of its fair value. the subscription
2. when the corporation becomes insolvent
(2) Liability of Directors for (Velasco v. Poizat)
Watered Stocks
(2) Notice Requirement
Directors or officers who shall commit the following
will be liable to the corporation or its creditors, The unpaid subscriptions are not due and payable
solidarily with the stockholder concerned for the without a call. A corporation cannot file an action to
difference between the value received at the time of recover the unpaid price if the action is not preceded
issuance of the stock and the par or issued value of by a call, until a call is made, no cause of action
the same: (Sec. 64) accrues (Lingayen Gulf Electric Power Company v.
1. consents to the issuance of stocks for a Baltazar, G.R. No. L-4824, June 30, 1954).
consideration less than the par or issued
value; d. Sale of Delinquent Shares (1)
2. consents to the issuance of stocks for a
consideration other than cash, valued in Payment of balance of subscription
excess of its fair value; Payment of unpaid subscription or any percentage
3. having knowledge of the insufficient thereof, together with any interest accrued, shall be
consideration does not file a written made on the date specified in the subscription
objection with the corporate secretary contract or on the date stated in the call made by the
board.(Sec 66)
(3) Trust Fund Doctrine for
Liability for Watered Stocks Effect of Failure to Pay Balance (Sec. 66)
1. The entire balance shall be due and
The Trust Fund Doctrine is the basis for the payable
prohibition on issuing watered stock. 2. The stockholder shall liable for interest
3. If no payment is made within thirty (30)
A Corporation has no power to release an original days from the said date, all stocks covered
subscriber of its capital stock from the obligation of by the subscription shall thereupon become
paying for his shares, without a valuable delinquent and shall be subject to sale as
consideration for such release; and as against hereinafter provided, unless the board of
creditors, a reduction of the capital stock can take directors orders otherwise.
place only in the manner and under the conditions
prescribed by the statute or the charter or the The prescriptive period in case of subscription of
articles of incorporation (Philippine Trust Corp. v. shares begins to run only from the time the board of
Rivera, G.R. No. L-19761, 1923). directors declares that the balance is due and
payable (Garcia v. Suarez, G.R. No. 45493, 1939)
c. Payment of Balance of
Subscription Unpaid Subscriptions (Sec. 66)
a. There will be interest imposed on unpaid
subscriptions
(2) Effect of Refusal to Inspect 2. Notice of the meeting should be given to the
Corporate Records stockholders by personal delivery or
registered mail at least twenty (20) days
Any officer or agent of the corporation who shall prior to the meeting;
refuse to allow the inspection and/or reproduction of 3. The notice of meeting should also be
records shall be liable for: published for once in a newspaper
1. damages
published in the principal place of business,
2. shall be guilty of an offense which shall be
punishable under Section 161, RCC otherwise, in a newspaper of general
circulation
If such refusal is made pursuant to a resolution or 4. The resolution to dissolve must be
order of the board of directors or trustees, the approved by the majority of the
liability under this section for such action shall be directors/trustees and approved by the
imposed upon the directors or trustees who voted stockholders representing at least majority
for such refusal. (Sec. 73) of the outstanding capital stock or majority
of members;
Defenses that may be used by officer / agent / 5. A verified request for dissolution is then
director / trustee: filed with the SEC stating:
1. the requesting party improperly used any a. the reason for dissolution
information secured through any prior b. the form, manner and time when
examination of the records or minutes of
the notices were given
such corporation or of any other
corporation, c. names of the stockholders and
2. the requesting party was not acting in good directors or members and trustees
faith or for a legitimate purpose in making who approved the dissolution
the demand to examine or reproduce d. the date, place, and time of the
corporate records, meeting in which the vote was
3. the requesting party is a competitor, made; and
director, officer, controlling stockholder or e. details of publication
otherwise represents the interests of a 6. In addition, the following shall be submitted
competitor (Sec. 73) to the SEC:
a. Copy of the resolution authorizing
11. Dissolution and Liquidation the dissolution, certified by a
majority of the board and
a. Modes of Dissolution countersigned by the secretary;
b. Proof of publication
Dissolution
c. Favorable recommendation from
Extinguishment of the franchise of a corporation and
the appropriate regulatory agency,
the initiation of the termination of its corporate
existence when necessary.
7. The SEC shall, within 15 days from the
However, the corporation shall nevertheless be receipt of the verified request for
continued as a body corporate for three (3) years dissolution, and in the absence of any
after the time when it would have been so dissolved, withdrawal within said period, approve the
for the purpose of prosecuting and defending suits request and issue the certificate of
by or against it and enabling it to settle and close its dissolution, upon which the dissolution will
affairs, to dispose of and convey its property and to take effect. (Sec. 134)
distribute its assets, but not for the purpose of
continuing the business for which it was established. 2. Where Creditors Are Affected
(Sec. 122) Procedure where the dissolution of the
corporation may prejudice the rights of any
(1) Voluntary Dissolution creditor:
1. A verified petition for dissolution shall be
1. Where No Creditors Are Affected filed with the SEC.
Procedure where no creditors are affected by
2. The petition shall be:
the dissolution of the corporation:
a. signed by a majority of the
1. A meeting must be held on the call of
corporation’s board of directors or
directors or trustees;
trustees
b. verified by its president or 10. The dissolution shall take effect only upon
secretary or one of its directors or issuance by the SEC of a certificate of
trustees dissolution* (Sec. 135)
c. shall set forth all claims and
demands against it 3. By Shortening Corporate Term
d. that its dissolution was resolved Procedure on voluntary dissolution by
upon by the affirmative vote of the shortening of the corporate term (Sec. 36):
stockholders representing at least 1. A private corporation may extend or
two-thirds (2/3) of the outstanding shorten its term by amending the articles of
capital stock or at least two-thirds incorporation when approved by a majority
(2/3) of the members at a meeting vote of the board of directors or trustees,
of its stockholders or members and ratified at a meeting by the
called for that purpose. stockholders or members representing at
3. The petition shall likewise state: least two-thirds (2/3) of the outstanding
a. the reason for the dissolution; capital stock or of its members.
b. the form, manner, and time when 2. Written notice of the proposed action and
the notices were given; the time and place of the meeting shall be
c. the date, place, and time of the sent to stockholders or members
meeting in which the vote was 3. In case of extension of corporate term, a
made. dissenting stockholder may exercise the
4. The corporation shall submit to the SEC right of appraisal under the conditions
the following: provided in this Code. (Sec. 137)
a. a copy of the resolution authorizing
the dissolution, certified by a Note: Under Sec. 11, the RCC now allows the
revival of a the corporate existence of an Expired
majority of the board of directors or
Corporation.
trustees and countersigned by the
secretary of the corporation; and If a corporation’s term has expired, it may apply for
b. list of all its creditors. a revival of its corporate existence, together with
5. By an order reciting the purpose of the all the rights and privileges under its certificate of
petition, the SEC shall fix a deadline for incorporation and subject to all of its duties, debts
filing objections to the petition (shall not be and liabilities existing prior to its revival. Upon
less than thirty (30) days nor more than approval by the SEC, the corporation shall be
sixty (60) days after the entry of the order). deemed revived and a certificate of revival of
6. Publication: Before such the deadline, a corporate existence shall be issued, giving it
copy of the order shall be published at least perpetual existence, unless its application for
once a week for three (3) consecutive revival provides otherwise. (Sec. 11)
weeks in a newspaper of general
Withdrawal Of Dissolution
circulation published in the municipality or
Procedure on Withdrawal of Request for
city where the principal office of the Dissolution:
corporation is situated, otherwise, in a 1. Withdrawal of Request of Dissolution: Not
newspaper of general circulation in the later than 15 days from the receipt by SEC
Philippines of the request for dissolution, the
7. Posting: A similar copy shall be posted for withdrawal thereof shall be made in writing,
three (3) consecutive weeks in three (3) duly verified by any incorporator, director,
public places in such municipality or city. trustee, shareholder, or member and
8. After the expiration of the time to file signed by the same number of
objections, a hearing shall be conducted incorporators, directors, trustees,
upon prior five (5) day notice to hear the shareholders, or members necessary to
objections; request for dissolution.
9. Judgment shall be rendered dissolving the 2. Upon receipt of a withdrawal of request for
corporation and directing the disposition of dissolution, the SEC shall withhold action
assets; the judgment may include on the request for dissolution and shall,
appointment of a receiver. after investigation:
Procedure on Withdrawal of Petition for The SEC shall give reasonable notice to, and
Dissolution coordinate with, the appropriate regulatory agency
A withdrawal of the petition for dissolution shall be prior to the involuntary dissolution of companies
in the form of a motion and similar in substance to a under their special regulatory jurisdiction.(Sec. 138)
withdrawal of request for dissolution but shall be
verified and filed prior to publication of the order Non-use of corporate charter (Sec. 21)
setting the deadline for filing objections to the If a corporation does not formally organize and
petition. (Sec. 137) commence its business within 5 years
● Entering into contracts or negotiations for organized (PNB v. Court of First Instance of Rizal,
lease or sale of properties to be used as Pasig, Br. XXI, G.R. No. 63201, 1992).
business or factory site;
● Making plans for and the construction of the A party’s stockholding in a corporation, whether
factory; and existing or dissolved, is a property right which he
● Taking steps to expedite the construction of may vindicate against another party who has
deprived him thereof.
the company’s working equipment
Stockholders may convey their respective
In the event of failure to file for an extension if a
shareholdings toward the creation of a new
corporation’s term has expired, it may apply for a
corporation to continue the business of the old or
revival of its corporate existence, together with all
they may reincorporate by filing new articles of
the rights and privileges under its certificate of incorporation and by-laws.
incorporation and subject to all of its duties, debts
and liabilities existing prior to its revival. Upon
Liquidation
approval by the SEC, the corporation shall be
Process by which all the assets of the corporation
deemed revived and a certificate of revival of
are converted into liquid assets in order to facilitate
corporate existence shall be issued, giving it
the payment of obligations to creditors, and the
perpetual existence, unless its application for revival remaining balance if any is to be distributed to the
provides otherwise. stockholders.
Demands of Minority for Dissolution
There is no time limit within which the trustees
Corporate dissolution due to mismanagement of
must complete a liquidation placed in their
majority stockholder is too drastic a remedy,
hands (Vigilla et.al. v. Philippine College of
especially when the situation can be remedied such
Criminology, G.R. No. 200094, 2013).
as giving minority stockholders a veto power to any
decision (Chase v. Buencamino, G.R. No. 20395,
1985).
b. Methods of Liquidation
Suppletory Effect
The provisions of other Titles of the Corporation Effects Of Issuance Or Transfer Of Stock In
Code shall apply suppletorily except insofar as Title Breach Of Qualifying Conditions. –
of Close Corporation otherwise provides. (Sec. 95)
(a) If shares of stock of a close corporation are
Management of a close corporation issued or transferred to any person who is not
The articles of incorporation of a close corporation eligible to be a holder thereof under any provision of
may provide that the business of the corporation the articles of incorporation, and if the certificate for
shall be managed by the stockholders of the such stock conspicuously shows the qualifications
corporation rather than by a board of directors. of the persons entitled to be holders of record
a. When they manage, stockholders are liable thereof, such person is conclusively presumed to
as directors; have notice of the fact of the ineligibility to be a
stockholder.
b. There is no need to call a meeting to elect
directors;
(b) If the articles of incorporation of a close
c. To the extent that the stockholders are corporation states the number of persons, not
actively engaged in the management, said exceeding twenty (20), who are entitled to be
stockholders shall be liable for corporate stockholders of record, and if the certificate for such
torts unless the corporation has obtained stock conspicuously states such number, and the
reasonably adequate liability insurance. issuance or transfer of stock to any person would
cause the stock to be held by more than such
Companies That Cannot Be Close Corporations number of persons, the person to whom such stock
(MIPES-BOO) is issued or transferred is conclusively presumed
a. Mining companies; to have notice of this fact.
b. Insurance companies;
c. Public utilities; (c) If a stock certificate of a close corporation
d. Educational institutions; conspicuously shows a restriction on transfer of the
e. Stock exchanges; corporation’s stock and the transferee acquires the
stock in violation of such restriction, the transferee
f. Banks;
is conclusively presumed to have notice of the
g. Oil companies;
fact that the stock was acquired in violation of
h. Other corporations declared to be vested with the restriction.
public interest.
(d) Whenever a person to whom stock of a
(2) Validity of Restrictions on close corporation has been issued or transferred
Transfer of Shares has or is conclusively presumed under this section
to have notice of:
Validity Of Restrictions On Transfers Of Shares 1. the person’s ineligibility to be a stockholder
(Sec 97) of the corporation; or
Restrictions on the right to transfer shares must 2. that the transfer of stock would cause the
appear in:
stock of the corporation to be held by more
1. The articles of incorporation;
than the number of persons permitted
2. The by-laws; and
under its articles of incorporation; or
3. In the certificate of stock 3. that the transfer violates a restriction on
transfer of stock, and the corporation may,
Otherwise, the same shall not be binding on any
at its option, refuse to register the transfer
purchaser thereof in good faith.
in the name of the transferee.
Said restrictions shall not be more onerous than
granting the existing stockholders or the corporation (e) The provisions of subsection (d) shall not
the option to purchase the shares of the transferring be applicable if the transfer of stock, though contrary
stockholder with such reasonable terms, conditions to subsections (a), (b) or (c), has been consented to
or period stated therein. by all the stockholders of the close corporation, or if
the close corporation has amended its articles of
If upon the expiration of said period, the existing incorporation in accordance with this Title.
stockholders or the corporation fails to exercise the
option to purchase, the transferring stockholder may (f) The term “transfer”, as used in this section,
sell his shares to any third person. is not limited to a transfer for
value.
Yes No Term
Trustees shall hold office for a period of three (3)
years until their successors are elected and qualified
Name of “Constituents” (Sec. 91)
Stockholders Members
Qualifications of Trustees
Only ONE qualification under Sec. 92: Membership
Limitation to Purpose
in the corporation. Nonetheless, the member who
There can be May not include a may be elected as trustee may just be a nominee. A
secondary purposes purpose which would trustee who ceases to be a member of the
change or contradict corporation can no longer act as a trustee.
its nature in AOI
Kind of Board Note: An independent trustee of a non-stock
Board of Directors Board of Trustees corporation vested with public interest need not be
a member of such non-stock corporation (Sec. 91)
Number of Board Members
For stock corporations, the "quorum" referred to in
Must not be more than May be more than 15
Section 52 of the Corporation Code is based on the
15
number of outstanding voting stocks. For nonstock
EXC: Special
corporations, only those who are actual, living
corporations
members with voting rights shall be counted in
Term of Board Members
determining the existence of a quorum during
1 year 3 years, but AOI or members' meetings. Dead members shall not be
by-laws may provide counted. (Tan v. Sycip, G.R. No. 153468 August 17,
Constant terms otherwise 2006)
5 years - educational Purposes
institutions A non-stock corporation may be formed or
organized for the following purposes:
Staggered terms a. Charitable,
How Board Members are Elected b. Religious,
Elected by the Directly elected by the
c. Educational,
stockholders (per members, unless AOI
d. Professional,
Corp. Code) provides otherwise
Manner of Voting e. Cultural,
Straight or cumulative Straight voting, unless f. Recreation,
voting AOI or by-laws g. Fraternal,
provide otherwise h. Literary,
Can membership be transferred? i. Scientific,
Generally yes Generally no, EXC: if j. Social,
AOI or by-laws k. Civic Service,
provide otherwise l. Similar purposes, like trade, industry,
Can a stockholder/member disengage from agriculture and like chambers, or
the corporation? m. Any combination of thereof (Sec. 87)
Can sell to other Articles or by-laws
stockholders OR specifically provide for In the Articles of Incorporation, a non-stock
exercise of appraisal the method of corporation may not include a purpose which would
rights termination change or contradict its nature as such.
3. That such chief archbishop, bishop, priest, (G.R. No. 180067, 1984), that a corporation sole is
minister, rabbi, or presiding elder is disqualified to acquire/hold alienable lands of the
charged with the administration of the public domain, because of the constitutional
temporalities and the management of the prohibition qualifying only individuals to acquire land
affairs, estate and properties of the and the provision under the Public Land Act which
religious denomination, sect, or church applied only to Filipino citizens or natural persons,
within the territorial jurisdiction, so has been expressly overturned in Director of Lands
described succinctly in the articles of v. IAC (G.R. No. 66575 1986).
incorporation
4. The manner by which any vacancy A registered corporation sole can acquire land if its
occurring in the office of chief archbishop, members constitute at least 60% Filipinos. (SEC
bishop, priest, minister, rabbi, or presiding Opinion, 8 August 1994)
elder is required to be filled, according to
the rules, regulations or discipline of the Dissolution of a Corporation Sole
religious denomination, sect or church; and A corporation sole may be dissolved and its affairs
5. The place where the principal office of the settled voluntarily by submitting to the SEC a
corporation sole is to be established and verified declaration of dissolution, setting forth:
located, which place must be within the 1. The name of the corporation;
territory of the Philippines. 2. The reason for dissolution and winding up;
6. The articles of incorporation may include 3. The authorization for the dissolution of the
any other provision not contrary to law for corporation by the particular religious
the regulation of the affairs of the denomination, sect or church; and
corporation. (Sec. 109) 4. The names and addresses of the persons
who are to supervise the winding up of the
Note: The articles must be verified by affidavit or affairs of the corporation.
affirmation of presiding elder. Document that such
presiding elder was duly elected or appointed as Upon approval of such declaration of dissolution by
such and this document must be certified by notary the SEC, the corporation shall cease to carry on its
public. (Sec. 110) operations except for the purpose of winding up its
affairs. (Sec. 113)
Acquisition and Alienation of Property
A corporation sole may purchase and hold real (2) Religious Societies (Sec.
estate and personal property for its church, 114)
charitable, benevolent, or educational purposes,
and may receive bequests or gifts for such General Rule: Any religious society, religious order,
purposes. (Sec. 111) diocese, or synod, or district organization of any
religious denomination, sect or church, may
Such corporation may sell or mortgage real property incorporate for the:
held by it by obtaining an order for that purpose from 1. Administration of its temporalities or
the Regional Trial Court of the province where the 2. For the management of its affairs, properties,
property is situated upon proof that the notice of the and estate
application for leave to sell or mortgage has been
made through publication or as directed by the Exception: Unless forbidden by the competent
Court, and that it is in the interest of the corporation authority, the Constitution, pertinent,
that leave to sell or mortgage be granted. (Sec. 111) rules, regulations, or discipline of the religious
denomination, sect or church of which it is part
Note: In cases where the rules, regulations, and
discipline of the religious denomination, sect or How incorporated:
church, religious society, or order concerned • Upon written consent and/or by an
represented by such corporation sole regulate the affirmative vote at a meeting called for the
method of acquiring, holding, selling, and purpose of at least two-thirds (2/3) of its
mortgaging real estate and personal property, such membership,
rules, regulations and discipline shall govern, and • By filing with the Commission, articles of
the intervention of the courts shall not be necessary. incorporation
(Sec. 111) • Verified by the affidavit of the presiding
elder, secretary, or clerk or other member
The doctrine in Republic v. Villanueva (G.R. No. of such religious society or religious
55418-19, 1982) and Republic v. Iglesia ni Cristo
denomination, sect or church, setting forth h. Natural person who is licensed to exercise
the following: a profession may not organize an OPC for
a) That the religious society or the purpose of exercising such a
religious order, or diocese, synod, profession.
or district organization is a
religious organization of religious Exception: unless otherwise provided by special
denomination, sect or church; laws. (Sec. 116)
b) That at least two-thirds (2/3) of its
membership has given written (2) Capital Stock Requirement
consent or has voted to (Sec. 117)
incorporate, at a duly convened
meeting of the body; General Rule: A One Person Corporation is not
c) That the incorporation of the required to have a minimum authorized capital
religious society or religious order, stock.
or diocese, synod, or district Exception: As otherwise provided by special law.
organization is not forbidden by
competent, authority or by the Note: Unless required by applicable laws or
Constitution, rules, regulations or regulations, no portion of the authorized capital is
discipline of the religious required to be paid up at the time of incorporation.
denomination, sect or church of (SEC Circular No. 7, Series of 2019)
which it forms part;
d) That the religious society or (3) Articles of Incorporation
religious order, or diocese, synod, and by-laws
or district organization desires to
incorporate for the administration Articles of incorporation and by-laws
of its affairs, properties and estate; Requirements for filing the Articles of Incorporation:
e) The place within the Philippines i. In accordance with Sec. 14 of the RCC.
where the principal office of the ii. If the single stockholder is a trust or an
corporation is to be established estate - the name, nationality, and
and located; and residence of the trustee, administrator,
f) The names, nationalities, and executor, guardian, conservator, custodian,
residence addresses of the or other person exercising fiduciary duties
trustees, not less than five (5) no together with the proof of such authority to
more than fifteen (15), elected by act on behalf of the trust or estate
the religious society or religious iii. Name, nationality, residence of the
order, or the diocese, synod or nominee and alternate nominee, and the
district organization to serve for extent, coverage and limitation of the
the first year or such other period authority. (Sec. 118)
as may be prescribed by the laws
of the religious society or religious Note: OPCs are NOT required to file their
order, or of the diocese, synod, or corporate bylaws. (Sec. 119)
district organization.
(4) Corporate Name
e. One Person Corporations
It should Indicate the letters “OPC” either below or
(1) Excepted Corporations at the end of their corporate name. (Sec. 120)
Who may not form • Bond shall be renewed every two (2) years
1. Banks and quasi-banks, non-bank financial or as often as may be required, upon review
institutions (SEC Memorandum 7-2019) of the Audited Financial Statements/
2. Pre-need, trust, insurance, public and Financial Statements certified under oath
publicly-listed companies by the company’s President/Treasurer
3. Non-chartered government-owned and - • Bond is a continuing requirement as long as
controlled the single stockholder is the self-appointed
4. Natural person who is licensed to exercise Treasurer of the OPC
a profession to form an OPC for the • Bond may be cancelled upon proof of
purpose of exercising such profession appointment of another person as the
Treasurer and Filing of Amended Form for
Exception: as provided under special laws Appointment of Officers
j. Other ancillary and/or consequential General rule: No minimum authorized capital stock
matters Exception: as otherwise provided by special law
What shall be contained in articles of A sole shareholder claiming limited liability has the
incorporation with regard to the nominee and burden of affirmatively showing that:
alternate nominee 1. the corporation was adequately financed.
a. names 2. the property of the One Person Corporation
b. residence addresses is independent of the stockholder’s
c. contact details personal property.
d. extent and limitations of their authority
in managing the affairs of the One Person The principles of piercing the corporate veil applies
Corporation. with equal force to One Person Corporations as with
other corporations
Term of Nominee and Alternate Nominee (Sec.
125) (8) Conversion of Corporation
Incapacity of the single stockholder: to One Person Corporations
1. Temporary - until the stockholder, by self and Vice-Versa
determination, regains the capacity to assume such
duties. Conversion from an Ordinary Corporation to a
2. Death or Permanent - until the legal heirs of OPC (Sec. 131)
the single stockholder have been lawfully When a single stockholder acquires all the stocks of
determined, and the heirs have designated one of an ordinary stock corporation, the latter may apply
them or have agreed that the estate shall be the for conversion into a OPC, subject to the submission
single stockholder of the One Person Corporation of such documents as the SEC may require. If the
application for conversion is approved, the SEC
Alternate Nominee shall issue certificate of filing of amended articles of
• Shall sit as director and manage the One incorporation reflecting the conversion.
Person Corporation in case of the
nominee’s inability, incapacity, death, or
refusal to discharge the functions as Conversion from an OPC to an Ordinary Stock
director and manager of the corporation Corporation (Sec. 132)
• for the same term and under the same A One Person Corporation may be converted into
conditions applicable to the nominee an ordinary stock corporation after due notice to the
SEC of such fact and of the circumstances leading
Minimum Capital Stock Required For One to the conversion, and after compliance with all
Person Corporation (Sec. 117) other requirements for stock corporations under this
Code and applicable rules. Such notice shall be filed organization. Isolated, occasional or casual
with the SEC within sixty (60) days from the transactions do not amount to engaging in business.
occurrence of the circumstances leading to the But where the isolated act is not incidental/casual
conversion into an ordinary stock corporation. If all but indicates the foreign corporation’s intention to do
requirements have been complied with, the SEC other business, said single act constitutes engaging
shall issue an amended certificate of incorporation in business in the Philippines.
reflecting the conversion.
a. Isolated Transactions Test: where a foreign
In case of death of the single stockholder, the corporation needs to obtain a license and fails
nominee or alternate nominee shall transfer the to do so, whether it should be denied legal
shares to the duly designated legal heir or estate standing to obtain remedies from local courts
within seven (7) days from receipt of either an and administrative agencies or not, depends
affidavit of heirship or self- adjudication executed by
therefore on the issue whether it will engage in
a sole heir, or any other legal document declaring
business in the Philippines. Not every activity
the legal heirs of the single stockholder and notify
the SEC of the transfer. Within sixty (60) days from undertaken in the Philippines amounts to doing
the transfer of the shares, the legal heirs shall notify business as to require a foreign corporation to
the SEC of their decision to either wind up and obtain such license.
dissolve the One Person Corporation or convert it
into an ordinary stock corporation. Single or isolated acts, contracts, or transactions of
foreign corporations are not regarded as a doing or
Note: The Converted Corporations shall succeed carrying on of business. Typical examples of these
the former corporation and be legally responsible for are the making of a single contract, sale, sale with
all the latter’s outstanding liabilities as of the date of the taking of a note and mortgage in the state to
conversion. secure payment thereof, purchase, or note, or the
mere commission of a tort. In these instances, there
f. Foreign Corporations is no purpose to do any other business within the
country (MR. Holdings, Ltd. V. Bajar, G.R. No.
A corporation formed, organized or existing under 138104, 2002).
any law other than those of the Philippines, and
whose laws allow Filipino citizens and corporations However: Where a single act or transaction is not
to do business in its own country or state. (Sec. 140) merely incidental or casual but indicates the foreign
corporation's intention to do other business in the
A foreign corporation is one which owes its Philippines, said single act or transaction constitutes
existence to the laws of another state, and doing business (Far East Int'l. v. Nankai Kogyo, G.R.
generally, has no legal existence within the state in No. 13525, 1962).
which it is foreign (Avon Insurance PLC v. Court of
Appeals, G.R. No. 97642, 1997). Need to Allege: The fact that a foreign corporation
is not doing business in the Philippines must be
A fundamental rule of international jurisdiction is that alleged, if a foreign corporation desires to sue in
no state can by its laws, and no court which is only Philippines courts under the “isolated transactions
a creature of the state, can by its judgments and rule” (Atlantic Mutual Inc. Co. v. Cebu Stevedoring
decrees, directly bind or affect property or persons Co., G.R. No. 18961, 1966); if not alleged, it can be
beyond the limits of that state (Time, Inc. v. Reyes, dismissed for lack of capacity to sue by the plaintiff
GR No. 28882, 1971). (Commissioner of Customs v. K.M.K. Gani, G.R. No.
73722, 1990).
(1) Bases of Authority Over
Foreign Corporations b. Twin Characterization Test (Mentholatum Co.
Inc v. Mangaliman G.R. No. 47701, 1941)
(a) Consent
It is the voluntary surrender of jurisdiction over its Substance Test: Consider the body or
person in a pending suit before the host state substance of the business or the enterprise for
(Salonga, Private International Law, 1979 ed., which it was organized or whether it has
p.344). substantially retired from it and turned it over to
(b) Doctrine of “Doing Business” another.
“Doing Business” with regard to Foreign Continuity Test: That doing business implies a
Corporations - Continuity of commercial dealings continuity of commercial dealings and
incident to prosecution of purpose and object of the arrangements and contemplates, to that extent, the
1. A copy of its articles of incorporation and a. A certificate under oath duly executed
bylaws, certified in accordance with law and by the authorized official or officials of
their translation to an official language of the the jurisdiction of its incorporation,
Philippines, if necessary. attesting to the fact that the laws of the
2. The application shall be under oath and shall country or State of the applicant allow
specifically set forth the following: Filipino citizens and corporations to do
a. The date and term of incorporation; business therein, and that the applicant
b. The address, including the street is an existing corporation in good
number, of the principal office of the standing. If the certificate is in a foreign
corporation in the country or State of language, a translation thereof in
incorporation; English under oath of the translator
c. The name and address of its resident shall be attached to the application.
agent authorized to accept summons b. A statement under oath of the
and process in all legal proceedings president or any other person
and all notices affecting the authorized by the corporation, showing
corporation, pending the establishment to the satisfaction of the Commission
of a local office; and when appropriate, other
d. The place in the Philippines where the governmental agencies that the
corporation intends to operate; applicant is solvent and in sound
e. The specific purpose or purposes financial condition, setting forth the
which the corporation intends to assets and liabilities of the corporation
pursue in the transaction of its as of the date not exceeding one (1)
business in the Philippines: Provided, year immediately prior to the filing of
That said purpose or purposes are the application.
those specifically stated in the 4. Foreign banking, financial, and insurance
certificate of authority issued by the corporations shall, in addition to the above
appropriate government agency; requirements, comply with the provisions of
f. The names and addresses of the existing laws applicable to them.
present directors and officers of the 5. In the case of all other foreign corporations, no
corporation; application for license to transact business in
g. A statement of its authorized capital the Philippines shall be accepted by the
stock and the aggregate number of Commission without previous authority from the
shares which the corporation has appropriate government agency, whenever
authority to issue, itemized by class, required by law. (Sec. 142)
par value of shares, shares without par
value, and series, if any; (a) Resident Agent
h. A statement of its outstanding capital Who may be a Resident Agent
a. Individual residing in the Philippines of
stock and the aggregate number of
good moral character and of sound
shares which the corporation has
financial standing
issued, itemized by class, par value of
b. Domestic corporation lawfully transacting
shares, shares without par value, and
business in the Philippines, with a sound
series, if any;
financial standing and must show proof that
i. A statement of the amount actually
it is in good standing as certified by the SEC
paid in; and
(Sec. 144)
j. Such additional information as may be
necessary or appropriate in order to Service of Process upon a Foreign Corporation
enable the Commission to determine Through A Resident Agent
whether such corporation is entitled to Before a foreign corporation can be issued a license
a license to transact business in the to transact business in the Philippines, such
Philippines, and to determine and corporation must first file with the SEC
assess the fees payable. 1. A written power of attorney designating some
3. The application shall be accompanied by the person who must be a resident of the
following: Philippines, on whom any summons and other
legal processes may be served in all actions or
other legal proceedings against such exercises its corporate powers. (Bitong v. CA, G.R.
corporation; No. 123553, 1998)
2. Consent that service upon such resident agent
shall be admitted and held as valid as if served (4) Suability of Foreign
upon the duly authorized officers of the foreign Corporations
corporation at its home office.
Every foreign corporation
a. Whenever such service of summons or
● Doing business in the Philippines with a license
other process is made upon the SEC,
may sue and can be sued in the Philippines
it must, within 10 days thereafter,
● Doing business in the Philippines without a
transmit by mail a copy of such
license cannot sue, but may be sued in the
summons or other legal process to the
Philippines
corporation at its home or principal
● Not doing business in the Philippines, or on
office. When SEC sends such copy, it
isolated transactions may sue and can be sued
shall constitute a necessary part of and
(if jurisdiction can be acquired)
shall complete such service
b. In case of a change of address of the
(5) Instances When Unlicensed
resident agent, it shall be his or its duty Foreign Corporations May
to immediately notify the SEC in be Allowed to Sue (Isolated
writing. (Sec. 145) Transactions)
3. Amendment of license (Sec. 148)
Instances When Unlicensed Foreign
A foreign corporation authorized to transact Corporations May Be Allowed To Sue:
business in the Philippines shall obtain an amended a. Isolated transactions;
license in the event it changes its corporate name, b. Action to protect good name, goodwill, and
or desires to pursue other or additional purposes in reputation of a foreign corporation;
the Philippines, by submitting an application with the c. The subject contracts provide that
Commission, favorably endorsed by the appropriate Philippine Courts will be venue to
government agency in the proper cases. controversies;
d. A license subsequently granted enables
Amendment of the Articles of Incorporation or
By-laws of Foreign Corporations the foreign corporation to sue on contracts
executed before the grant of the license
Sixty (60) days after the effectivity of the (Eriks Ltd. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
amendment of the articles of incorporation or bylaws 118843, 1997);
of a foreign corporation authorized to transact e. Recovery of misdelivered property;
business in the Philippines, such foreign corporation f. Where the defendant is estopped.
shall, file with the Commission, and in the proper
cases, with the appropriate government agency, a The Intellectual Property Code provides that any
duly authenticated copy of the amended articles of foreign corporation not engaged in business in the
incorporation or bylaws, indicating clearly in capital Philippines and a national of a country which is a
letters or underscoring the change or changes party to any convention, treaty or agreement relating
made, duly certified by the authorized official or to intellectual property rights or the repression of
officials of the country or State of incorporation. unfair competition, to which the Philippines is also a
party or extends reciprocal rights, may sue in
Such filing shall not in itself enlarge or alter the trademark or service mark enforcement action
purpose or purposes for which such corporation is (Sehwani Inc v. In-n-Out Burger, G.R. No. 171053,
authorized to transact business in the Philippines. 2007).
(Sec. 147)
Rules Regarding A Foreign Corporation’s Right
(3) Personality to Sue to Bring Suit in the Philippines
(Agilent Technologies v. Integrated Silicon, G.R. No.
Section 35 enumerates the express powers of a 154618, 2004)
corporation, which includes the corporation’s ability
to sue and be sued.
FOREIGN CORP CAN FC SUE IN PH? a. Failure to file its annual report or pay any
STATUS fees as required by Code;
Doing business in Cannot sue before b. Failure to appoint and maintain a resident
Philippines without a Philippine courts agent;
license c. Failure to inform SEC of the change of
Not doing business in Can sue before resident agent or the latter’s change of
the Philippines Philippine courts on an address;
isolated transaction or d. Failure to submit a copy of amended
on a cause of action
articles of incorporation or by- laws; or
entirely independent
of any business articles of merger or consolidation;
transaction e. A misrepresentation of any material
Doing business in the Can sue before matters in reports;
Philippines without a Philippine courts due f. Failure to pay any and all taxes, imposts,
license, but Philippine to estoppel assessments or penalties;
citizen or entity has g. Engaged in a business not authorized by
contracted with said SEC;
corporation or derived h. Acting as a dummy of a foreign corporation
benefits from the not licensed to do business in the
Foreign Corporation Philippines; or
Doing business in the Can sue before i. Any other ground as would render it unfit to
Philippines and has Philippine courts on transact business in the Philippines.
the required license any transaction
Law applicable to Foreign Corporations (Sec.
Capability to Sue and Suability of Foreign 146)
Corporations W/N Doing Business A foreign corporation lawfully doing business in the
DOING BUSINESS IN THE NOT DOING Philippines shall be bound by all laws, rules and
PHILIPPINES BUSINESS regulations applicable to domestic corporations of
IN THE the same class, except:
PHILIPPINES 1. those which provide for the creation,
Licensed Unlicensed Isolated formation, organization or dissolution of
Transactions
corporations or
YES, can sue NO, cannot Yes, can sue; 2. those which fix the relations, liabilities,
sue; responsibilities, or duties of stockholders,
EXC: if members, or officers of corporations to
EXC: transactions each other or to the corporation.
estoppel exhibits intent
to do 13. Merger and Consolidation
business,
Foreign a. Concept
Corporation
needs license Merger
to sue A union whereby one or more existing corporations
YES, can be YES, can be sued are absorbed by another corporation that survives
sued and continues the combined business (Villanueva,
Qualifier: as long as 2018).
summons were properly
served (to acquire Consolidation
jurisdiction) The union of two or more existing corporations. A
new corporation is created, and consolidating
(6) Grounds for Revocation of corporations are extinguished. (PNB v. Andrada
License Electric & Engineering Co., G.R. No. 142936, [April
17, 2002], 430 PHIL 882-903)
Section 151 provides that the SEC may cancel the
certificate or license of a foreign corporation on any
of the following grounds:
Differentiating Merger from Consolidation binding only between them and cannot
MERGER CONSOLIDATION prejudice creditors who are not parties thereto.
A corporation A NEW corporation is (Y-I Leisure Philippines, Inc. et al. v James Yu,
ABSORBS another created, and G.R. No. 207161, 2015)
corporation and constituent
REMAINS IN corporations are NOTE: The sale under [Sec. 39] does not
EXISTENCE while the EXTINGUISHED. contemplate an ordinary sale of all corporate assets;
other is DISSOLVED the transfer must be of such degree that the
transferor corporation is rendered incapable of
The power to merge or consolidate is not within the continuing its business or its corporate purpose. (Y-
inherent powers of the corporation. Therefore, it I Leisure Philippines, Inc. et al. v James Yu, G.R.
must be expressly granted by law. No. 207161, 2015)
Merger or consolidation does not become effective However, not every transfer of the entire corporate
by mere agreement of the constituent corporations. assets would qualify under Section [39]. It does not
The approval of the SEC is required (PNB v. apply:
Andrada Electric & Engr. Co., Inc., G.R. No. 142936, (1) if the sale of the entire property and
2002) assets is necessary in the usual and regular
course of business of corporation, or
Mere Acquisition/Transfer (3 Levels) (2) if the proceeds of the sale or other
MERGER/CONSOLIDATION TRANSFER OF disposition of such property and assets will
PROPERTY be appropriated for the conduct of its
Loss of separate existence by A NEW remaining business.
the absorbed corporation (in corporation is Thus, the litmus test to determine the applicability of
mergers) or the constituent created, and Section [39] would be the capacity of the corporation
corporations (in constituent to continue its business after the sale of all or
consolidation) corporations are substantially all its assets.(Y-I Leisure Philippines,
EXTINGUISHED. Inc. et al. v James Yu, G.R. No. 207161, 2015)
The articles must be signed by the president or vice STEP 3: Stockholders’ or Members’ Approval
president and certified by the secretary or assistant (Sec. 76)
secretary setting forth: 1. Notice of such meeting should be given to
i. The plan of the merger or the plan of all stockholders or members at least 1 week
consolidation; before the meeting.
ii. As to stock corporations, the number of 2. The plan has to be approved by a vote of
shares outstanding, or in the case of stockholders representing ⅔ of the
non-stock corporations, the number of outstanding capital stock, if a stock
members; corporation, or ⅔ of the members of the
non- stock corporation.
3. Dissenting stockholders may exercise their the opportunity to be heard. Written notice
right of appraisal. However, if the board of the date, time and place of hearing shall
abandons the plan, such right is be given to each constituent corporation at
extinguished. least two (2) weeks before said hearing.
4. Any amendment to the plan must be
approved by the same votes of the board e. Effects
members or trustees and stockholders or
members required for the original plan. A merger does not become effective upon the mere
agreement of the constituent corporations, but open
STEP 4: Articles of Merger or Consolidation approval of the articles of merger by the SEC issuing
(Sec. 77) the certificate of merger as required by Section 79
Once the required number of stockholders or of the Corporation Code (Bank of Commerce v.
members approved of the plan, Articles of Merger or Heirs of Rodolfo dela Cruz).
Articles of Consolidation shall be executed by each
of the constituent corporations, to be signed by the Effects of Merger or Consolidation
president or vice-president and certified by the 1. Constituent corporations become a single
secretary or assistant secretary of each corporation, corporation
setting forth: a. Merger: surviving corporation
a. The plan of the merger or the plan of b. Consolidation: consolidated
consolidation; corporation under
b. As to stock corporations, the number of the plan of
shares outstanding, or in the case of consolidation
non-stock corporations, the number of 2. Separate existence of constituent
members; corporations cease EXCEPT that of the
c. As to each corporation, the number of surviving or consolidated corporation
shares or members voting for or against 3. Surviving or consolidated corporation
such plan, respectively; possesses the rights privileges immunities;
d. The carrying amounts and fair values of and powers and is subject to all duties and
the assets and liabilities of the liabilities of a corporation organized under
respective companies as of the agreed this Code
cut-off date; 4. ALL of the following are deemed
e. The method to be used in the merger or transferred to and vested in such surviving
consolidation of accounts of the or consolidated corporation:
companies; (BY OPERATION OF LAW)
f. The provisional or pro-forma values, as a. Rights
merged or consolidated, using the b. Privileges
accounting method; and c. Immunities
g. Such other information as may be d. Franchises of each constituent
prescribed by the SEC. corporation
e. Real or personal property
STEP 5: Approval by the SEC f. Receivables due on whatever
The Articles of Merger or Articles of Consolidation account (hence
shall be submitted to the SEC for approval. surviving/consolidated corp has
However, in the case of special corporations, like the power to file an action for
banks, insurance companies, building and loan
recovery) including:
associations, etc., the favorable recommendation of
i. subscriptions to shares
the appropriate government agency shall first be
obtained. and other choses in
1. If the SEC is satisfied that the merger or action
consolidation of the corporations ii. and every other interest
concerned is legal, it shall issue a certificate of, belonging to, or due to
of merger or of consolidation, at which time each constituent
the merger or consolidation shall be corporation
effective. 5. Regarding liabilities and pending claims:
2. If the SEC is not satisfied, it shall set a a. Liabilities and obligations of each
hearing to give the corporations concerned constituent corporation:
1. State Policies
TOPIC OUTLINE UNDER THE SYLLABUS:
a. The State shall maintain a central monetary
A. THE NEW CENTRAL BANK ACT
authority which is the Bangko Sentral ng
1. State Policies Pilipinas (BSP)
2. Monetary Board and its Powers and b. The BSP is an independent and
Functions accountable body corporate.
3. The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas and c. The mandated responsibilities are in the
Banks in Distress field of money, banking, and credit.
a. Conservatorship d. The BSP is a government-owned
b. Closure corporation with fiscal and administrative
c. Receivership autonomy. (Sec 1, New Central Bank Act
d. Liquidation [hereinafter “NCBA”])
B. GENERAL BANKING LAW OF 2000 The State’s central monetary authority is charged
1. Definition and Classification of Banks with the responsibility of administering the
2. Distinction of Banks from Quasi-Banks monetary, banking, and credit system of the country
and Trust Entities and is granted the power of supervision and
3. Nature of Bank Funds and Bank examination over bank and non-bank financial
Deposits institutions performing quasi-banking functions,
4. Diligence Required of Banks including savings and loan associations. (Busuego
5. Prohibited Transactions by Bank v. Court of Appeals [CA], G.R. No. 95326, 1999)
Directors and Officers
6. Stipulation on Interests 2. Monetary Board, Powers And
Functions
C. SECRECY OF BANK DEPOSITS
1. Purpose The Monetary Board is a seven (7) man body
2. Prohibited Acts appointed by the President through which the
3. Deposits Covered powers and functions of the BSP are exercised. Its
members shall serve a term of six (6) years, and no
4. Exceptions from Coverage
member shall be reappointed more than once. (Sec.
5. Garnishment of Deposits, including
6, NCBA)
Foreign Deposits
Composition
D. ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING ACT
a. Chairman who is the BSP Governor;
1. Policy b. A cabinet member to be designated by the
2. Covered Institutions and Their President of the Philippines;
Obligations c. 5 Members who shall come from the private
3. Covered Transactions sector, all of whom shall serve full time (Id.)
4. Suspicious Transactions
5. Safe Harbor Provision While Sec. 6(a) of the NCBA requires that the
6. Money Laundering (How Committed; Governor be subject to confirmation by the
Unlawful Activities or Predicate Crimes) Commission on Appointments, he is not among
7. Anti-Money Laundering Council and its government officials expressly mentioned in Sec.
Functions 16, Article VII of the Constitution who should be
8. Authority to Inquire into Bank Deposits confirmed. (Tarrosa vs. Singson, G.R. No. 111243,
9. Freezing of Monetary Instrument or 1994)
Property
Vacancies
Any vacancy in the Monetary Board created by the
death, resignation, or removal of any member shall
be filled by the appointment of a new member to
complete the unexpired period of the term of the
member concerned. (Sec. 7, NCBA)
Qualifications
a. Natural-born citizens of the Philippines; Indemnification
b. At least 35 years of age; (except the They shall be indemnified for any and all liabilities,
Governor, who should be at least 40 years losses, claims, demands, damages, deficiencies,
of age) costs and expenses of whatsoever kind and nature
c. Of good moral character; that may arise in connection with the exercise of
d. Of unquestionable integrity; their powers and performance of their duties and
e. Of known probity and patriotism; and functions. (Id.)
f. With recognized competence in social and
economic disciplines (Sec. 8, NCBA) Exception: Their actions or omissions are finally
adjudged to be in willful violation of the BSP Charter,
Disqualifications performed in evident bad faith, or with gross
a. Disqualifications imposed by R.A. No. 6713 negligence. (Id.)
– Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards
for Public Officials; The legal obligations of diligence and good faith that
b. Disqualified from being a director, officer, BSP officials owe to the public start with the official
employee, consultant, lawyer, agent or acts of the Monetary Board which, rightly or wrongly,
stockholder of any bank, quasi-bank or any are the cause of loss or injury to third parties, not
other institution which is subject to any preparatory report or recommendation.
supervision or examination by the BSP; (Borlongan v. Reyes, G.R. No. 161726, 2005)
c. Members coming from the private sector
shall not hold any other public office or Removal of Members of the Monetary Board
public employment during their tenure. The President may remove any member of the
d. Person who has been connected directly Monetary Board for any of the following reasons:
with any multilateral banking or financial a. The member no longer possesses the
institution or has a substantial interest in qualifications under NCBA, Sec. 8;
any private bank in the Philippines, within 1 b. The member is guilty of acts or operations
year prior to his appointment; which are fraudulent or illegal;
e. No member shall be employed in any such c. The member is physically, or mentally
institution within 2 years after the expiration incapacitated and such incapacity lasted
of his term (compared with the one year for more than 6 months;
prohibition for ordinary public official under d. The member is subsequently disqualified
R.A. No. 6713 and R.A. No. 3019) except under NCBA, Sec. 9. (Sec. 10, NCBA)
when he serves as an official
representative of the Philippine Powers and Functions of the Monetary Board
Government to such institution; and a. Issue rules and regulations;
f. Person who has substantial interest in any b. Direct the management, operations, and
private bank in the Philippines, within 1 year administration of the BSP;
prior to his appointment. (Sec. 9, NCBA) c. Establish a human resource management
system;
Degree of Diligence d. Adopt its annual budget and authorize
The degree of diligence required of Monetary Board expenditures;
Members, BSP Officials, and Employees, is now e. Indemnify its members and other officials of
aligned with that required of public officers under the BSP against all costs and expenses
Sec. 38 and 39 of Chapter 9, Book I of the Revised reasonably incurred by such persons by
Administrative Code of 1987 (previously it was reason of the performance of their functions
“extra-ordinary diligence”). They cannot be liable for or duties in accordance with the free and
acts done in the performance of their official duties harmless, and indemnification clause.
“unless there is a clear showing of bad faith, malice (Secs. 15 and 16, NCBA)
or gross negligence.” (Sec. 16, NCBA) The former
requirement of extraordinary diligence was Myriad of functions
already amended. BSP is an administrative agency which exercises
"powers and/or functions which may be
General Rule: characterized as administrative, investigatory,
Free and Harmless regulatory, quasi-legislative, or quasi-judicial.”
BSP, members of the Monetary Board, and its other (Bank of Commerce v. Planter’s Development Bank,
personnel, are held free and harmless to the fullest G.R. Nos. 154470-71 and 154589-90, 2012)
extent permitted by law from any liability. (Sec. 16,
NCBA)
When the Monetary Board exercises its quasi- withdrawals may be considered as suffering from
judicial powers or functions, it has the power to issue liquidity problems.
subpoena, to sue for contempt those refusing to
obey the subpoena without justifiable reason, or Status of the Bank
administer oaths and compel presentation of books, A bank placed under conservatorship remains open
records, and others, needed in its examination, to but under the management and control of the
impose fines and other sanctions and to issue cease conservator. On the other hand, when a bank is
and desist order. The BSP Monetary Board can ordered closed by the Monetary Board, it is taken
exercise discretion in determining whether over by the PDIC as statutory “receiver”, and the
administrative sanctions should be imposed on PDIC is directed to proceed with the liquidation.
banks and quasi-banks. (UCPB v. Ganzon, G.R. No. (Sec. 30(d), NCBA; Sec. 12, New PDIC Charter)
168859, 2009; Sec. 37, NCBA)
under conservatorship) in 1 year, payable in 12 liquidation, and the same is also true for
equal monthly payments. “receivership” and “liquidation”
Exception: A conservator connected with the BSP, The appointment of a receiver operates to suspend
in which case said conservator shall not be entitled the authority of the bank and of its directors and
to receive any remuneration or emolument (Sec. 29, officers over its property and effects. (Villanueva v.
NCBA) CA, G.R. No. 114870, 1995)
transactions which amount to fraud or a Judicial Remedy from the decision of the
dissipation of assets; (Sec. 30[d], NCBA) Monetary Board of BSP placing a bank under
h. Persistence in conducting its business in conservatorship, receivership, or liquidation
an unsafe or unsound manner. (Sec. 56,
GBL) Final and Executory. The action of the Monetary
Board in placing a bank under conservatorship or
Close Now-Hear Later Doctrine placing it under receivership and liquidation shall be
The provision under Sec. 30 of the NCBA that the final and executory and, as a general rule, may not
Monetary Board may summarily and without need be restrained or set aside by the court.
for prior hearing forbid the institution from doing
business in the Philippines is a statutory Nature of Action
enactment based on jurisprudence. Due process A petition for certiorari on the ground that the action
does not necessarily require prior hearing; a hearing taken was in excess of jurisdiction or with such
or an opportunity to be heard may be subsequent to grave abuse of discretion as to amount to lack or
closure. One can just imagine the dire excess of jurisdiction.
consequences of a prior hearing; bank runs would
be the order of the day, resulting in panic and Petitioner and period to file
hysteria. In the process, fortunes may be wiped out Petition is filed by the stockholders of record
and disillusionment will run the gamut of the entire representing the majority of the capital stock within
banking community. (Rural Bank of Buhi, Inc. vs. ten (10) days from receipt by the board of directors
CA, G.R. No. L-61689, 1988) of the institution of the order directing receivership,
liquidation, or conservatorship. (Sec. 30, NCBA)
The purpose is to prevent unwarranted dissipation
of the bank’s assets and as a valid exercise of the Court of Appeals
police power to protect the depositors, creditors, The petition for certiorari must be filed with the CA,
stockholders, and the general public. (Central Bank not the SC, in accordance with Rule 65, since the
of the Philippines v. CA, G.R. No. 72200, 1993) Monetary Board is a quasi-judicial agency. (Vivas,
et al. v. Monetary Board, G.R. No. 191424, 2013)
d. Liquidation
Note: Other decisions of the Monetary Board acting
The recovery and conversion of assets into cash for as a quasi-judicial body can be elevated to the Court
distribution to all creditors in accordance with the of Appeals by way of a petition for review under Rule
rules on concurrence and preference of credits. 43.
PDIC is the receiver and liquidator (AM No. 19-12-
02-SC, Sec. 1 (m), Rule 2). Involuntary dissolution and liquidation
CORPORATION NCBA (MONETARY
Types of Liquidation CODE (SEC) BOARD, PDIC)
a. Voluntary liquidation FILING OF COMPLAINT
In case of the voluntary liquidation of any Requires filing of a Monetary Board may
bank organized under the laws of the verified complaint and summarily and without
Philippines, or of any branch or office in the proper notice and need for prior hearing,
Philippines of a foreign bank, written notice hearing forbid the bank from
of such liquidation shall be sent to the doing business
Monetary Board before such liquidation is PRIOR TO DISSOLUTION
undertaken, and the Monetary Board shall Requires a BIR Tax PDIC shall immediately
have the right to intervene and take such Clearance; SEC shall gather and take charge
steps as may be necessary to protect the issue final order of of all its assets and
interests of creditors. (Sec. 68, GBL) dissolution after liabilities
submission of tax
b. Involuntary Liquidation (Sec. 30, NCBA) clearance
AUTHORITY OF THE CORPORATION
Modes of Liquidation IN THE DISSOLUTION
a. Conventional liquidation. Corporation is allowed Bank is not given the
b. Purchase of Assets and/or Assumption of to undertake its own option to undertake its
Liabilities liquidation or at any own liquidation
time during 3 years
after its dissolution
(In re: Petition for Assistance in the Liquidation of more money and precious time (Carandang
the Rural Bank of Bokod Benguet, Inc., PDIC v. BIR, v. CA, G.R. No. L-44932, 1988); and
G.R. No. 158261, 2006) c. When the issue is the validity of contracts
upon which a claim is based.
Nature of the Proceedings in Petition for
Assistance in Liquidation Note: Even if the case falls within the exceptions,
A liquidation proceeding is a special proceeding, the claimant should still file the adjudicated claim
and a proceeding in rem. Jurisdiction over all with the liquidator or liquidation court for processing
persons affected by the proceedings shall be of claims to determine the proper concurrence and
considered acquired upon publication of the order preference of credit among the different creditors of
setting the Petition for Assistance in Liquidation for the bank. (Cudiamat v. Batangas Savings Bank,
initial hearing (Rules on Liquidation of Closed G.R. No. 182403, 2010)
Banks, Rule 3, Sec. 1, 2020).
Termination of the Proceedings
Exclusive Jurisdiction of the Liquidation The finality of the resolution approving the final
Court Asset Distribution Plan shall usher in the winding up
Liquidation court refers to the regional trial court phase under the PDIC Charter and the termination
designated as Special Commercial Court where the of the liquidation proceeding (Rules on Liquidation
Petition for Assistance in the Liquidation of a closed of Closed Banks, Rule 10, Sec. 1, 2020).
bank is filed by the PDIC and given due course. It
has exclusive jurisdiction to adjudicate disputed B. GENERAL BANKING LAW OF 2000
claims against the closed bank, assist in the
enforcement of individual liabilities of the directors, 1. Definition And Classification Of
officers, and stockholders, and decide on all other Banks
issues as may be material to implement the
distribution plan PDIC adopted for general Banks
application to all closed banks (that is, the Master Entities engaged in the lending of funds obtained in
Liquidation Plan). (Rules on Liquidation of Closed the form of deposits. (Sec. 3.1, GBL)
Banks, Rule 3, Sec. 1(c), 2020)
Note: No person or entity shall engage in banking
“Disputed claims” refer to all claims, whether they be operations or quasi-banking functions without
against the assets of the insolvent bank, for specific authority from the Bangko Sentral Banks (Sec. 6,
performance, breach of contract, damages, or GBL). Its corporate powers are exercised within its
whatever (Miranda vs. PDIC, G.R. No. 169334, banking license.
2006).
Elements
General Rule- All claims should be filed with the 1. Engaged in lending of funds
liquidation court. 2. Obtained in the form of deposits
In a judicial liquidation of an insolvent bank, all 3. From the public, which shall mean 20 or
claims against the bank should be filed in the more persons
liquidation proceeding. (In re: Petition for Assistance 4. Entity should be a stock corporation.
in the Liquidation of the Rural Bank of Bokod However, an exception is a cooperative
Benguet, Inc., PDIC v. BIR, G.R. No. 158261, 2006). bank which is formed under the
The liquidation court’s exclusive jurisdiction pertains Cooperative Code (Sec. 23[i], R.A. No.
to the adjudication of claims against the bank. It 9520).
does not cover the reverse situation where it is the 5. Minimum capital requirements prescribed
bank that files a claim against another person or by the MB is satisfied (Sec. 8, GBL).
legal entity (Manalo vs. CA, G.R. No. 14129, 2001)
Franchise: The Articles of Incorporation (SEC) or
Exceptions: Articles of Cooperation (CDA) is the primary
a. When re-filing and re-litigating the case franchise, and the secondary franchise is issued by
before the liquidation court would be an the BSP to engage in banking. SEC will not register
exercise in futility in view of the number of the articles of incorporation of a bank unless
years the case has been on trial and accompanied by a certificate of authority from the
additional expenses to the party who is BSP (Sec. 14, Revised Corporation Code of the
living in poverty. (Valenzuela v. CA, G.R. Philippines). Banks with original charters, such as
No. L-56168, 1988) DBP, LBP, Al Amanah Islamic Bank of the
b. When more inconveniences would be Philippines, and Philippine Veterans Bank are
caused to the parties, entailing waste of
governed by the laws creating them as far as their etc.). (MORB – Manual of Regulations for Banks,
authority to exist as a juridical entity and corporate Appendix 19)
powers are concerned`.
Commercial Banks
Classification of Banks They shall have, in addition to the general powers
The classification of banks according to functions incident to corporations:
and services are: a. All such powers as may be necessary to
1. Universal banks; carry on the business of commercial
2. Commercial banks; banking such as accepting drafts and
3. Thrift banks, composed of: issuing letters of credit;
a. Savings and mortgage banks; b. Discounting and negotiating promissory
b. Stock savings and loan notes, drafts, bills of exchange, and other
associations; and evidence of debt;
c. Private development banks; c. Accepting or creating demand deposits;
4. Rural banks d. Receiving other types of deposits and
5. Cooperative banks; deposit substitutes;
6. Islamic banks; e. Buying and selling foreign exchange and
7. Digital banks; and gold or silver bullion;
8. Other classifications of banks as f. Acquiring marketable bonds and other debt
determined by the Monetary Board. securities; and
g. Extending credit, subject to such rules as
Universal Banks the Monetary Board may promulgate. (Sec.
Universal bank has the authority to exercise 29, GBL)
1. Powers granted to a commercial bank
2. The powers of an investment house Unlike Universal Banks, Commercial Banks can
3. Power to invest in non-allied enterprises. invest only in allied enterprises (bank-related
4. May own up to 100% of the equity in a thrift activities), which may be financial or non-financial.
bank, rural bank, financial allied enterprise, (Secs. 30, 31, and 32, GBL)
or non-financial allied enterprise. (Sec. 23,
25 and 26, GBL) Thrift Banks
They are organized for the purpose of, among other
Investment House things, accumulating savings of depositors and
It is an intermediary between security issuers and investing them with capital loans, financing
investors. It engages in underwriting of securities, homebuilding, providing short term capital, medium
among other things. (Sec. 2, PD 129). and long term financing for small and medium
enterprises and individuals engaged in agriculture,
Financial Allied services, industry and housing. (Sec. 3[a][1]), R.A.
Financial allied enterprise is a firm with homogenous No. 7906 - Thrift Banks Act)
or similar activities, business, or functions as a
financial intermediary, such as banks, Investment They include savings and mortgage banks, private
houses, financing companies, credit card development banks, and stock savings and loans
companies etc. (MORB, Sec. 372-373, MORB, associations organized under existing laws. (Id.)
Appendix 62 )
Rural Banks
Non-Financial Allied Banks which are designed to make needed credit
Non-financial allied enterprise is a firm with available and readily accessible in the rural areas on
activities, business, or functions that are connected reasonable terms. (Sec. 2, R.A. No. 7353 - Rural
to banking but is not considered a financial Act)
intermediary such are warehousing companies,
storage companies, safe deposit box companies, Cooperative Banks
companies primarily engaged in the management of The majority shares of which is owned and
mutual funds but not in the mutual funds controlled by cooperatives, primarily to provide
themselves, companies providing computer financial and credit services to cooperatives and
services etc. their members (Art. 2, R.A. No. 9520 – Philippine
Cooperative Code), It may also provide the same
Non-allied enterprises services to non-members or the general public
They are non-bank related activities (e.g., (MORB, Appendix 34)
agriculture, mining, manufacturing, public utilities,
Trust Entities and business or implied." It simply means that the bank is obliged
A stock corporation, or a person duly authorized by to observe "high standards of integrity and
the Monetary Board to engage in trust business, and performance" in complying with its obligations under
act as a trustee, administer any trust or hold the contract of simple loan. (Goyanko, Jr. v. UCPB,
property in trust or on deposit, for use, benefit or G.R. No. 179096, 2013)
behoof of another (GBL. Sec. 79). Trust business
is any activity resulting from a trustor-trustee Bank Deposit as a simple loan
relationship (trusteeship) involving the Bank acquires ownership of money deposited;
appointment of a trustee by a trustor for the obligation to pay the amount, but no obligation to
administration, holding, and management of return the same money. (Guingona, Jr. v. City Fiscal
funds and/or properties of the trustor by the of Manila, G.R. No. L-60033, 1984)
trustee for the use, benefit, or advantage of the
Payment to proper party-depositor (Fultron Iron
trustor or of others called beneficiaries (MORB,
Sec. 403 (2020); & MORNBFI, Sec. 403-Q & Sec. Works Co. v. China Banking Corp., G.R. No. 32576,
102-T) 1930)
Bank, Quasi-Bank, and Trust Entity Deposits are not preferred credits. (Central Bank v.
Morfe, G.R. No. L-38427, 1975)
BANK QUASI-BANK TRUST
ENTITY
Bank has the right to set-off or compensation.
Entities Entities Entities
(Gullas v. Philippine National Bank, G.R. No. 4391,
engaged in the engaged in the engaged in
1935)
lending of borrowing of trust,
funds obtained funds through investment
Kinds of Deposits
in the form of the issuance or management,
a. Savings Deposits. They are interest
deposits. acceptance of and fiduciary
bearing deposits without a stated maturity.
deposit business.
b. Negotiable Order of Withdrawal (NOW).
substitutes for
They are interest bearing deposit accounts
the purpose of
that combine the payable on demand
relending or
feature and investment feature of savings
purchasing
accounts.
receivables or
c. Time Deposits. They are issued for a
other
specific period of time (Sec. 216, MORB),
obligations.
and generally cannot legally be withdrawn
before maturity or within a specified number
of days. (BPI Family Savings v. First Metro
3. Nature Of Bank Funds And Bank Investment, G.R. 132390, 2004)
Deposits d. Demand Deposits. They are those
liabilities of the BSP and of other banks,
By the nature of its business, banks derive its funds which are denominated in Philippine
principally from its deposit taking or quasi-banking currency and are subject to payment in
operations. It also gets funds from the public when legal tender upon demand by the
it acts as a trust entity under Chapter IX of the GBL. presentation of checks. Only banks duly
authorized by the BSP may issue demand
Nature of Bank Funds deposits. (Sec. 59, NCBA)
The bank can make use as its own, the money
deposited. (Tan Tiong Tick v. American Checks representing demand deposits do not have
Apothecaries, G.R. No. L-43682, 1938) legal tender power and their acceptance in the
payment of debts, both public and private, is at the
Nature of Bank Deposits option of the creditor. However, a check which has
Bank deposits are in the nature of irregular deposits. been cleared and credited to the account of the
Fixed, savings, and current deposits of money in creditor shall be equivalent to a delivery to the
banks and similar institutions shall be governed by creditor of cash in an amount equal to the amount
the provisions concerning simple loans. (Art. 1980, credited to his account. (Sec. 60, NCBA)
NCC)
4. Diligence Required Of Banks In
The fiduciary relationship does not "convert the View Of Fiduciary Nature Of
contract between the bank and its depositors from a
Banking
simple loan to a trust agreement, whether express
Banking is vested with public interest An indirect borrowing includes one that is made
As a business affected with public interest and by a third party, but the DOSRI has a stake in the
because of the nature of its functions, the bank is transaction; a case where the DOSRI acted for his
under obligation to treat the accounts of its own benefit, using the name of an unsuspecting
depositors with meticulous care, always having in person and using dummies to circumvent the
mind the fiduciary nature of their relationship. requirements of the law. (Soriano v. BSP, G.R. No.
(Simex International (Manila) Inc. v CA, G.R. No. 162336, 2010)
88013, 1990)
Related Interest is considered as indirect borrowing
Banks are expected to exercise the highest degree or the Directors, Officers and Stockholders.
of diligence in the selection and supervision of their a. Spouse or relative within the first degree
employees. By the very nature of their work, the (including adoption)
degree of responsibility, care and trustworthiness b. Partnership where the spouse or relative is
expected of their employees and officials is far a general partner
greater than those of ordinary clerks and c. Co-ownership of the property mortgaged to
employees. (Philippine Commercial and secure the loan or other credit
International Bank v. CA, G.R. No. 121413, 2001) accommodations
d. Interlocking directorship or officership
Banking business is impressed with public interest, between the bank and the borrower
of paramount importance thereto is the trust and e. Corporation at least 20% of the capital
confidence of the public in general, the highest stock or equity is owned by DOS of the
degree of diligence is expected, and high standards lending bank. (MORB, Sec. 341[e])
of integrity and performance are even required of it.
(Bank of the Philippine Islands v. Casa Montessori Exception: The director or officer may do so,
Internationale, G.R. No. 149454, 2004) provided the following requirements are complied
with:
a. Written approval of the majority of all the
5. Prohibited Transactions By Bank directors of the bank, excluding the director
Directors And Officers borrowing and recorded in the books of the
bank. (Sec. 36, GBL)
Principles b. The reportorial requirement where such
The Monetary Board is granted the authority to approval should be entered upon the
regulate the amount of loans and credit records of the corporation, and a copy of
accommodations extended to Directors, Officers, the entry be transmitted to the appropriate
Stockholders and their Related Interest (DOSRI). supervising department of the BSP. (Id.; Go
(Sec. 36) v. BSP, GR No. 178429, 2009)
c. Ceiling requirement. The limit on the
The prohibition on DOSRI loans is intended as a amount of loans and credit
protection against over-borrowing of bank funds by accommodations that can be extended to
bank’s DOSRI, as such over-borrowings may lead the bank’s DOSRI is equivalent to their
to bank failures. (Soriano v. BSP, G.R. No. 162336, respective unencumbered deposits and
2010) Banks are not created for the benefit of their book value of their paid-in capital
directors and officers, they cannot use the assets of contribution in the bank, excluding the
the bank for their benefit. (Go v. BSP, G.R. No. following:
178429, 2009) 1. Secured by assets considered as
non-risk by the Monetary Board;
2. In the form of fringe benefits; or Courts have the power to reduce interest in loan
3. Extended by a cooperative bank to transactions if they find it excessive, iniquitous,
its cooperative shareholders. (Id.) unconscionable, or exorbitant. What is iniquitous,
unconscionable, and exorbitant shall depend upon
d. Terms. Not less favorable to the bank than the factual circumstances of each case (Dio v.
those offered to others. (Id.) Japor, G.R. No. 154129).
e. Waiver of Secrecy. DOSRI loans are also
subject to the waiver of secrecy of bank Other Special Laws empowering the BSP to
deposits. (Sec. 26, NCBA) regulate/set interest rate ceiling
For an escalation clause to be valid there should be The following are liable under R.A. No. 1405:
a corresponding de-escalation clause that a. Any person or government official who
authorizes a reduction in interest rates examines, inquires, or looks into bank
corresponding to downward changes made by the deposits or government bond investments
law or by the Bangko Sentral's Monetary Board in any instance not allowed by law.
(Villa Cristina Monte Realty & Development b. Any official or employee of the banking
Corporation vs Equitable PCIBank G.R. No. institution who makes a disclosure
208336, 2018) concerning bank deposits to another in any
instance not allowed by law (Sec. 3, R.A.
If a provision neither states an increase nor a No. 1405); and
decrease in interest rate, but said clause simply c. Any person who commits a violation of any
states that the interest rate should be based on the provision of this law. (Sec. 5, R.A. No.
prevailing market rate, it violates the mutuality of 1405)
contracts. (Polotan Sr. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
119379, 1998) Foreign Currency Deposits
All foreign currency deposits are absolutely
confidential and cannot be examined, inquired, or
C. SECRECY OF BANK DEPOSITS looked into by any person, government official,
bureau, or office, whether judicial or administrative
1. Purpose or legislative, or any other private or public entity.
(Sec. 8, R.A. No. 6426)
R.A. No. 1405 (Bank Secrecy Law) covers deposits
in Peso while R.A. No. 6426 (Foreign Currency The following are liable under R.A. No. 6426:
Deposits Act) covers deposits in foreign currency. a. Any person or government official who
Its purpose is as follows: examines, inquires, or looks into foreign
a. To give encouragement to the people to currency deposits without written
deposit their money in banking institutions; permission of the depositor. (Sec. 8, R.A.
and No. 6426)
b. To discourage private hoarding so that the b. Anyone who shall attach, garnish, or
same may be properly utilized by banks in subject the foreign currency deposit to any
authorized loans to assist the economic other order or process of any court,
development of the country. (Sec. 1, R.A. legislative body, or other administrative
No. 1405) body. (Id.)
c. Any official or employee of the banking
State Policy institution who makes a disclosure
It is hereby declared the policy of the state to protect concerning bank deposits to another in any
and preserve the integrity and confidentiality of bank instance not allowed by law. (Sec. 10, R.A.
accounts. (Sec. 2, R.A. No. 9160 [hereinafter No. 6426)
“AMLA”]) d. Any person who commits a violation of any
provision of this law as well as regulation of
Construction of confidentiality the Monetary Board pursuant to this law.
If there are doubts in upholding the absolutely (Id.)
confidential nature of bank deposits against
affirming the authority to inquire into such accounts, 3. Deposits Covered
such doubt must be resolved in favor of
confidentiality. (Republic v. Eugenio, G.R. No. Peso Deposits. All (peso) deposits of whatever
174629, 2008) nature with banks or banking institutions in the
Philippines including trust accounts. (Ejercito v.
2. Prohibited Acts Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 157294-95, 2006)
Foreign currency deposits (R.A. No. 6426) and Fishing for information as to the amount of damages
deposits in offshore banking units (PD No. 1246, it can recover does not fall within the exception.
Sec. 8) are considered as absolutely confidential. Since the subject matter of the dispute is not the
R.A. No. 6426 only provided for written permission money deposited in the drawer's account, it does
of the depositor as an exception. However, other not, by itself, warrant the examination of the bank
exceptions evolved by jurisprudence and statutes. deposits. (Union Bank vs. CA, GR No. 134699,
1999)
Note: Other funds or properties in the bank which
are not in the nature of deposits are still confidential. The subject matter of the action is to be determined
No director, officer, employee, or agent of any bank from the indictment that charges respondent with
shall, without order of a court of competent the offense, and not from the evidence sought. The
jurisdiction, disclose to any unauthorized person information charges qualified theft. There was no
any information relative to the funds or properties in mention of the supposed bank account in which the
the custody of the bank belonging to private funds represented by the checks have allegedly
individuals, corporations, or any other entities. (Sec. been kept to allow testimony on the bank account.
55(1)(b), GBL) (BSB Group vs. Go, GR No. 168644, 2010)
2. Covered Institutions and Their 6. Persons who provide for any of the
Obligations following services:
a. Managing of client money, securities,
Covered Institutions or other assets;
1. Supervised or regulated by the Bangko b. Management of bank, savings, or
Sentral ng Pilipinas: Banks, non-banks, quasi- securities account;
banks, trust entities, foreign exchange dealers, c. Organization or contribution for the
pawnshops, money changers, remittance, and creation, operation, or management of
transfer companies and other similar entities companies; and
and all other persons and their subsidiaries and d. Creation, operation or management of
affiliates juridical persons or arrangements, and
2. Supervised or regulated by the Insurance buying and selling business entities.
Commission: Insurance companies, pre-need (Sec. 3[a][7], AMLA, as amended by
companies, and all other person (e.g., R.A. No. 10365)
insurance agents and brokers, professional
reinsurers, reinsurance brokers, holding Lawyers and accountants are not
companies and systems, mutual benefit considered as covered persons if they
associations and their subsidiaries and render services under item 6 provided the
affiliates); following requisites are present.
3. Supervised or regulated by the Securities
and Exchange Commission a. They are acting as independent
a. Securities dealers, brokers, salesmen, legal professionals
investment houses, and other similar b. Authorized to practice in the
persons managing securities or Philippines; and
rendering services as investment c. They are subject to the provisions
agent, advisor, or consultant; of their respective codes of
b. Mutual funds, close-end investment conduct and/or professional
companies, common trust funds, and responsibility or any of its
other similar persons; and amendments. (Sec. 3[a], AMLA,
c. Other entities administering or as amended by R.A. No. 10365)
otherwise dealing in currency,
commodities, or other financial They shall be excluded from the coverage of the
derivatives based thereon, valuable Anti-Money Laundering Act in relation to
objects, cash substitutes, and other information concerning their clients or where
similar monetary instruments or the disclosure of information would compromise
property client confidences or the attorney-client
4. Jewelry dealers who deal with precious relationship.
metals, and precious stones for transactions in 7. Casinos, including internet and ship-based
excess of One Million Pesos (P1,000,000.00); casinos with respect to their casino cash
5. Company service providers which, as a transactions related to their gaming operations.
business, provide any of the following services (Sec. 3[a][8], AMLA, as amended)
to third parties: 8. Real estate developers and brokers (Sec.
a. Acting as a formation agent of juridical 3[a][9], AMLA, as amended by R.A . No.
persons; 11521); and
b. Acting as (or arranging for another 9. Supervised, accredited or regulated by
person to act as) a director or corporate PAGCOR or any government agency:
secretary of a company, a partner of a Offshore gaming operators, as well as their
partnership, or a similar position in service providers (Sec. 3[a][10] AMLA, as
relation to other juridical persons; amended by R.A. No. 11521)
c. Providing a registered office, business
address or accommodation,
correspondence or administrative Obligations Of Covered Persons
address for a company, a partnership Persons and institutions covered by the Anti-Money
or any other legal person or Laundering Act are subject to the following
arrangement; and obligations:
d. Acting as (or arranging for another
person to act as) a nominee a. Customer Identification (“Know Your
shareholder for another person; and Client”) - covered and institutions shall:
the client and/or the client’s past transactions (b) Converts, transfers, disposes of, moves,
with the covered institution; acquires, possesses or uses said monetary
6. The transaction is in any way related to an instrument or property;
unlawful activity or offense under the Anti- (c) Conceals or disguises the true nature,
Money Laundering Act that is about to be, is source, location, disposition, movement, or
being, or has been committed; or ownership of or rights with respect to said
7. Any transaction that is similar or analogous to monetary instrument or property;
any of the foregoing. (Sec. 3[b-1], AMLA, as (d) Attempts or conspires to commit money
amended by R.A. No. 9194) laundering offenses referred to in
paragraphs (a), (b), and (c);
5. Safe Harbor Provision (e) Aids, abets, assists in or counsels the
commission of the money laundering
No administrative, criminal, or civil proceedings shall offenses referred to in paragraphs (a), (b),
lie against any person for having made a covered and (c) above; and
transaction report or suspicious transaction report in (f) Performs or fails to perform any act as a
the regular performance of his/her duties in good result of which he/she facilitates the offense
faith, whether or not such reporting results in any of money laundering referred to in
criminal prosecution under the Anti-Money paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) above. (Sec. 4,
Laundering Act or any other law. (Revised IRR of AMLA, as amended by R.A. No. 9194 and
R.A. No. 9194, Rule 9.c.5) R.A. No. 10365)
Exemption from Bank Secrecy Laws
When reporting covered or suspicious transactions Failing to file a report as a Money Laundering
to the AMLC, covered persons and their officers and Offense.
employees shall not be deemed to have violated Any covered institution or person who, knowing that
R.A. No. 1405 (Secrecy of Bank Deposits), as a covered or suspicious transaction is required
amended, R.A. No. 6426 (Foreign Currency under the Anti-Money Laundering Act to be reported
Deposits Act) and R.A. No. 8791 (General Banking to the Anti-Money Laundering Council, fails to do so.
Law), and other similar laws, provided that (Sec. 4, AMLA, as amended by R.A. No. 9194 and
confidentiality is observed. (Sec. 9[c], AMLA, as R.A. No. 10365)
amended)
“Monetary Instrument” refers to proceeds of, or
6. Money Laundering (How instruments related to an unlawful activity. This may
Committed; Unlawful Activities or refer to any of the following:
Predicate Crimes) 1. Coins or currency of legal tender of the
Philippines, or of any other country;
Money Laundering is a crime whereby the proceeds 2. Drafts, checks, and notes;
of an unlawful activity are transacted, thereby 3. Securities or negotiable instruments, bonds,
commercial papers, deposit certificates, trust
making them appear to have originated from
certificates, custodial receipts, or deposit
legitimate sources. (Sec. 4, AMLA)
substitute instruments, trading orders,
Persons liable for Money Laundering: transaction tickets and confirmations of sale or
investments and money market instruments;
1. Any person; or
2. Any person employed with a covered and
institution 4. Other similar instruments where title thereto
passes to another by endorsement,
Elements: assignment, or delivery. (Sec. 3[c], AMLA)
1. The monetary instrument or property
“Unlawful Activity” refers to any act, omission, or
represents, involves or relates to the
series or combination thereof involving or having
proceeds of any unlawful activity;
2. Knowledge of the offender that the any direct relation to the following:
monetary instrument or property 1. Kidnapping under ransom;
2. Sections 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16
represents, involves or relates to the
proceeds of the unlawful activity; of the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act;
3. The offender commits any of the following: 3. Section 3, paragraphs B, C, E, G, H, and I of the
Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act;
(a) Transacts said monetary instrument or
property; 4. Plunder;
5. Robbery and Extortion;
6. Jueteng and Masiao punished as Illegal
Gambling;
7. Piracy on the high seas; part of the taxpayer: Provided, finally, That in no
8. Qualified Theft; case shall the AMLC institute forfeiture
9. Swindling and Other Forms of Swindling; proceedings to recover monetary instruments,
10. Smuggling; property or proceeds representing, involving, or
11. Violations of the Electronic Commerce Act; relating to a tax crime, if the same has already
12. Hijacking and other violations of the Anti- been recovered or collected by the BIR in a
Hijacking Law and Destructive Arson and separate proceeding; and (New provision under
Murder; R.A. 11521)
13. Terrorism and Conspiracy to Commit Terrorism 36. Felonies and offenses of a similar nature that
14. Financing of Terrorism and offenses punishable are punishable under the penal laws of other
under the Terrorism Financing Prevention and countries. (Sec. 3[i], AMLA, as amended by
Suppression Act; R.A. No. 9194 and R.A. No. 10365)
15. Bribery and Corruption of Public Officers;
16. Frauds and Illegal Exactions and Transactions; 7. Anti-Money Laundering Council and
17. Malversation of Public Funds and Property; its Functions
18. Forgeries and Counterfeiting;
19. Violations of the Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act; The Anti-Money Laundering Act created the entity
20. Violations of the Revised Forestry Code of the known as the Anti-Money Laundering Council
Philippines; (AMLC). The AMLC is composed of:
21. Violations of the Philippine Fisheries Code; 1. Governor of Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas as its
22. Violations of the Philippine Mining Act; Chairman;
23. Violations of the Wildlife Resources 2. The Commissioner of the Insurance
Conservation and Protection Act; Commission as a member;
24. Violations of the National Caves and Cave 3. The Chairman of the Securities and Exchange
Resources Management Protection Act; Commission as a member. (Sec. 7, AMLA, as
25. Violations of the Anti-Carnapping Act; amended by R.A. No. 9194 and R.A. No.
26. Violations of the Decree Codifying the Laws on 10365)
Illegal/Unlawful Possession, Manufacture,
Dealing in, Acquisition or Disposition of The AMLC has the following functions:
Firearms, Ammunition or Explosives; 1. Require and receive covered or suspicious
27. Violations of the Anti-Fencing Law; transaction reports from covered institutions
28. Violations of the Migrant and Overseas Workers and persons (Sec. 7, AMLA, as amended by
Filipinos Act; R.A. No. 9194);
29. Violations of the Intellectual Property Code; 2. Issue orders addressed to the appropriate
30. Violations of the Anti-Photo and Video Supervising Authority or the covered institution
Voyeurism Act; to determine the true identity of the owner of any
31. Violations of the Anti-Child Pornography Act; monetary instrument or property subject to a
32. Violations of the Special Protection of Children covered transaction or suspicious transaction
Against Abuse, Exploitation, and report or request for assistance from a foreign
Discrimination; State, or believed by the AMLC, on the basis of
33. Fraudulent practices and other violations of the substantial evidence, to be, in whole or in part,
Securities Regulation Code; wherever located, representing, involving, or
34. Violation of Section 19 (a)(3) of the “Strategic related to, directly or indirectly, in any manner
Management Act”, in relation to the proliferation or by any means, the proceeds from an unlawful
of weapons of mass destruction and its activity (Sec. 7, AMLA, as amended by R.A. No.
financing pursuant to United Nations Security 9194);
Council Resolution Numbers 1718 of 2006 and 3. Institute civil forfeiture proceedings and all other
2231 of 2015; (New provision under R.A. remedial proceedings through the Office of the
11521) Solicitor General (Sec. 7, AMLA);
35. Violation of Section 254 of Chapter II, Title X of 4. Cause the filing of complaints with the
the NIRC, where the deficiency basic tax due in Department of Justice or the Ombudsman for
the final assessment is in excess of Twenty-five the prosecution of money laundering offenses;
million pesos (P25,000,000.00) per taxable 5. Investigate suspicious transactions and
year, for each tax type covered and there has covered transactions deemed suspicious after
been a finding of probable cause by the an investigation by the AMLC, money
competent authority: Provided, further That laundering activities, and other violations of the
there must be a finding of fraud, willful AMLA (Sec. 7, AMLA, as amended by R.A. No.
misrepresentation or malicious intent on the 9194);
6. Apply before the Court of Appeals, ex parte for indirectly, including funds and assets derived or
the freezing of any monetary instrument or generated therefrom, by individuals or entities
property alleged to be laundered, proceeds designated and listed under United Nations
from, or instrumentalities used or intended to be Security Council Resolution Numbers 1718 of
used in any unlawful activity (Sec. 7, AMLA, as 2006 and 2231 of 2015 and their successor
amended by R.A. No. 9194); resolutions as well as any binding resolution of
7. Implement such measures as may be the Security Council; and (new provision under
necessary and justified under the AMLA to R.A. 11521)
counteract money laundering (Sec. 7, AMLA); 16. Preserve, manage, or dispose assets pursuant
8. Receive and take action in respect of, any to a freeze order, asset preservation order, or
request from foreign states for assistance in judgement of forfeiture (new provision under
their own anti-money laundering operations R.A. 11521)
(Sec. 7, AMLA);
9. Develop educational programs on the 8. Authority to Inquire into Bank
pernicious effects of money laundering, the
Deposits
methods and techniques used in money
laundering, the viable means of preventing
The Anti-Money Laundering Council may inquire
money laundering and the effective ways of
into or examine any particular deposit or investment,
prosecuting and punishing offenders (Sec, 7,
including related accounts, with any banking
AMLA);
institution or non-bank financial institution upon
10. Enlist the assistance of any branch,
order of any competent court. (Sec. 11, AMLA, as
department, bureau, office, agency, or
amended by R.A. No. 9194 and R.A. No. 10167)
instrumentality of the government, including
government-owned and controlled
The term “related accounts” shall refer to accounts,
corporations, in undertaking any and all anti-
the funds and sources of which originated from
money laundering operations, which may
and/or materially linked to the monetary
include the use of its personnel, facilities and
instrument(s) or property(ies) subject of the freeze
resources for the more resolute prevention,
order(s). (Sec. 11, AMLA, as amended by R.A. No.
detection, and investigation of money
9194 and R.A. No. 10167)
laundering offenses and prosecution of
offenders(Sec. 7, AMLA);
The order of the competent court must be based on:
11. Impose administrative sanctions for the
1. An ex parte application in cases of violations of
violation of laws, rules, regulations and orders,
the Anti-Money Laundering Act; and
and resolutions issued pursuant thereto (Sec. 7,
2. Probable cause that the deposits or
AMLA as amended by R.A. No. 9194);
investments, including related accounts
12. Require the Land Registration Authority and all
involved, are related to an unlawful activity.
its Registries of Deeds to submit to the AMLC
(Sec. 11, AMLA, as amended by R.A. No. 9194
reports on all real estate transactions involving
and R.A. No. 10167)
an amount in excess of Five Hundred Thousand
Pesos (P500,000.00) within fifteen (15) days
No court order shall be required in the following
from the date of the registration of the
cases:
transaction, in a form to be prescribed by the
1. Kidnapping for ransom;
AMLC. The AMLC may also require the Land
2. Sections 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16
Registration Authority and all its Registries of
of the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act;
Deeds to submit copies of relevant documents
3. Hijacking and other violations of the Anti-
of all real estate transactions. (Sec. 7, AMLA, as
Hijacking Law and Destructive Arson and
amended by R.A. No. 10365)
Murder;
13. Apply for the issuance of a search and seizure
4. Felonies similar to those previously mentioned
order with any competent court (new provision
which are punishable in other countries;
under R.A. 11521)
5. Terrorism and conspiracy to commit terrorism
14. Apply for the issuance of subpoena ad
(Sec. 11, AMLA, as amended by R.A. No. 9194
testificandum and/or subpoena duces tecum
and R.A. No. 10167)
with any competent court (new provision under
R.A. 11521)
The Court of Appeals shall act on the application to
15. Implement target financial sanctions in relation
inquire into or examine any depositor or investment
to proliferation of weapons of mass destruction
with any banking institution or non-bank financial
and its financing, including ex parte freeze,
institution within twenty-four (24) hours from the
without delay, against all funds and other assets
that are owned and controlled, directly or
III. INSURANCE
A. BASIC CONCEPTS OF
TOPIC OUTLINE UNDER THE SYLLABUS
INSURANCE
Contract of Insurance
A. BASIC CONCEPTS
1. An agreement;
1. Elements of an Insurance Contract 2. Whereby one undertakes for a
2. Characteristics/Nature of Insurance consideration;
Contracts 3. To indemnify another against loss, damage
3. Classes of Insurance or liability;
a. Marine 4. Arising from an unknown or contingent
b. Fire event. (Sec. 2[a], Insurance Code).
c. Casualty
d. Suretyship 1. Elements of an Insurance Contract
e. Life
f. Microinsurance Requisites of Ordinary Contracts:
g. Compulsory Motor Vehicle Liability a. Consent
Insurance b. Subject-matter
h. Compulsory Insurance Coverage for c. Cause
Agency-Hired Workers
4. Insurable Interest Additional Requisites for Insurance Contract:
5. Double Insurance and Overinsurance (PIRAD)
6. No Fault, Suicide, and Incontestability a. As consideration for the insurer’s Promise,
Clause the insured makes a ratable contribution
called premium, to a general insurance
fund.
B. PERFECTION OF THE INSURANCE
b. The insured must possess an interest of
CONTRACT
some kind susceptible of pecuniary
estimation, known as insurable Interest;
C. RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF PARTIES c. The insured is subject to a Risk of loss
1. Insurer through the destruction or impairment of
2. Insured that interest by the happening of
3. Beneficiary designated perils;
d. The insurer Assumes the risk of loss;
D. RESCISSION OF INSURANCE e. Such assumption is part of a general
CONTRACTS scheme to Distribute actual losses among
1. Concealment a large group of persons bearing somewhat
2. Misrepresentation or Omissions similar risks;
3. Breach of Warranties
Note: The presence of these five elements are what
separates Insurance from other contracts, and
which makes Insurance a “risk-distributing device”.
(De Leon, The Insurance Code Annotated, 2014)
Risk-distributing device
A contract of insurance is primarily a risk-distributing
device, a mechanism by which all members of a
group exposed to a particular risk contribute
premiums to an insurer. From these contributory
funds are paid whatever losses occur due to
exposure to the peril insured against.
performance becomes requisite. It is not by what it An insurance may arise by operation of law. By way
is called (White Gold Marine Services v. Pioneer of example, the War Damage Corporation Act
Insurance, G.R. No. 154514, 2005) provides for the payment of compensation without
requiring a contract of insurance or the payment of
Principal Objects and Purpose Test premium or other charge as if a policy was in fact in
Whether the assumption of risk and indemnification force at the time of the loss or damage. (De Leon,
of loss (which are elements of an insurance The Insurance Code Annotated, 2019)
business) are the principal object and purpose of the
organization or whether they are merely incidental Social insurance for members of the Government
to its business. If these are the principal objectives, Service Insurance System (GSIS) and for
the business is that of insurance. But if they are employees of the private sector covered by the
merely incidental and service is the principal Social Security System (SSS) is also established by
purpose, then the business is not insurance. law. (De Leon, The Insurance Code Annotated,
(Philippine Health Care Providers v. CIR, G.R. No. 2019)
167330, 2009)
2. Aleatory
Contracts for Personal Service Distinguished An insurance contract is aleatory in the sense that it
from Contracts of Insurance depends upon some contingent event.
Contracts a law firm enters into with clients whereby
in consideration of periodical payments, the law firm An insurance contract is not a contract of chance
promises to represent such clients in all suits for or although the event against the occurrence of which
against them are not insurance contracts but are it is intended to provide may never occur. De Leon,
contracts for personal services; The Insurance Code Annotated, 2019)
A contract by which a corporation, in consideration By an aleatory contract, one of the parties or both
of a stipulated amount, agrees at its own expense to reciprocally bind themselves to give or to do
defend a physician against all suits for damages for something in consideration of what the other shall
malpractice is one of insurance, and the corporation give or do upon the happening of an event which is
will be deemed as engaged in the business of uncertain, or which is to occur at an indeterminate
insurance since the purpose of the contract is to time. (Art. 2010, Civil Code)
indemnify against loss and damage. (Philippine
Health Care Providers v. CIR, G.R. No. 167330, In insurance, each party must take a risk; the
2009) insurer, that of being compelled upon the happening
of the contingency, to pay the entire sum agreed
2. Characteristics/ Nature Of upon the insured, that of parting with the amount
Insurance Contracts required as premium without receiving anything
therefor in case the contingency does not happen
Characteristics of Insurance Contracts (VAU- except what is ordinarily termed “protection” which
CCC-PP) is itself is a valuable consideration (De Leon, The
1. Voluntary Insurance Code Annotated, 2019, citing Vance, op.
An insurance contract is voluntary in the sense that cit. p. 93))
it is not compulsory and the parties may incorporate
such terms and conditions as they may deem 3. Unilateral
convenient (Art. 1306, Civil Code) which will be An insurance contract is executed as to the insured
binding (Art. 1308, Civil Code) provided they do not after the payment of the premium, and executory on
contravene any provision of law and are not the part of the insurer in the sense that it is not
opposed to public policy. (Art. 1306, Civil Code) executed until payment for a loss.
Note: Although the contract of insurance is In other words, it is a unilateral contract imposing
generally a voluntary contract, the carrying of legal duties only on the insurer who promises to
insurance, particularly liability insurance, may be indemnify in case of loss.
required by law in certain instances such as motor
vehicles (Secs. 373-389, Insurance Code), or The contract contemplates the payment of the
employees (Arts. 168-184, Labor Code), or as a premium as condition precedent to the inception of
condition to granting a license to conduct a business the contract but the insured usually assumes no
or calling affecting the public safety or welfare (De duty to pay subsequent premiums enforceable at
Leon, The Insurance Code Annotated, 2019) the suit of the insurer unless the latter has continued
the insurance after maturity of the premium, in
consideration of the insured’s express or implied NOTE: As a rule, the insured cannot assign, before
promise to pay. But he has a right to pay the the happening of the loss, his rights under a property
stipulated premium and the insurer is under a duty policy to others without the consent of the insurer.
to accept the payment when tendered. Of course, (Sec. 85, Insurance Code)
the insurer may not be liable if the insured fails to
pay the premiums. In such a case, the insurance Consequently, the obligation of the insurer to pay
usually lapses. (De Leon, The Insurance Code does not attach to or run with the property whether
Annotated, 2019) it be real property or personal. (De Leon, The
Insurance Code Annotated, 2019)
4. Consensual
An insurance contract is consensual because it is It follows that if a person whose property is insured
perfected by the meeting of the minds of the parties. sells it to another, the buyer cannot be his successor
(Art. 1319, Civil Code) in the contract of insurance unless the sale is with
the consent of the insurer or unless by express
So, if an application for insurance has not been stipulation of the parties, the contract is made to run
either accepted or rejected, there is no contract as with the property to the transferee. (Secs. 20, 57, 58,
yet. (Secs. 49-50, Insurance Code) Insurance Code)
agreement between the insurer and the insured. (De However, the Insurance Code does not limit marine
Leon, The Insurance Code Annotated, 2019) insurance to risks of navigation. (Sec. 101,
Insurance Code)
The word "property" is a generic term. Hence, it
could include machinery and equipment which are Scope of Marine Insurance
assets susceptible of being insured. Inasmuch as 1. Insurance Against Loss or Damage
machinery and equipment are included under the a. Vessels, craft, aircraft, vehicles, goods, freights,
term "property," petitioner must give notice to the cargoes, merchandise, effects, disbursements,
insurer of any other fire insurance policies on said profits, moneys, securities, choses in action,
machinery and equipment. instruments of debts, valuable papers,
bottomry, and respondentia interests and all
Where the insurance policy specifies as a condition other kinds of property and interests therein, in
the disclosure of existing co-insurers, non- respect to, appertaining to or in connection with
disclosure thereof is a violation that entitles the any and all risks or perils of navigation, transit
insurer to avoid the policy. This condition is common or transportation, or while being assembled,
in fire insurance policies and is known as the “other packed, crated, baled, compressed or similarly
insurance clause.” (J. Hernando: Multi-Ware prepared for shipment or while awaiting
Manufacturing Corp. v. Cibeles Insurance Corp., shipment, or during any delays, storage,
G.R. No. 230528, 2021). transshipment, or reshipment incident thereto,
including war risks, marine builder's risks, and
Nature of Insurance Contracts all personal property floater risks;
A contract of insurance is an agreement whereby
one undertakes for a consideration to indemnify b. Person or property in connection with or
another against loss, damage or liability arising from appertaining to a marine, inland marine, transit
an unknown or contingent event. (Sec. 2(a), or transportation insurance, including liability for
Insurance Code) loss of or damage arising out of or in connection
with the construction, repair, operation,
The character of insurance is to be determined by maintenance or use of the subject matter of
the exact nature of the contract actually entered into such insurance (but not including life insurance
whatever the form it takes or by whatever name it or surety bonds nor insurance against loss by
may be called. reason of bodily injury to any person arising out
of ownership, maintenance, or use of
Thus, it was held that an agreement entered into by automobiles);
a corporation, even though it was called a surety
company, to indemnify for a valuable consideration c. Precious stones, jewels, jewelry, precious
another against loss by reason of uncollectible metals, whether in course of transportation or
debts, was a contract of insurance and not a otherwise; and
contract of indemnity. (Tebbets v. Guarantee Co.,
73 F. 95) d. Bridges, tunnels and other instrumentalities of
transportation and communication (excluding
Under the Code, a contract of suretyship shall be buildings, their furniture and furnishings, fixed
deemed an insurance contract “if made by a surety contents and supplies held in storage); piers,
who or which as such, is doing an insurance wharves, docks and slips, and other aids to
business,” within the meaning of the Code. But navigation and transportation, including dry
strictly speaking, a contract of suretyship is different docks and marine railways, dams and
from a contract of insurance. (De Leon, The appurtenant facilities for the control of
Insurance Code Annotated, 2019) waterways.
c. Expenses of shipment exceed three- they are expected to arise, and the valuation fixes
fourths (3/4) of value of cargo. (Sec. their amount. (Sec. 162, Insurance Code)
141, Insurance Code)
Average
In case of constructive total loss, insured may: Any extraordinary or accidental expense incurred
a. Abandon the goods or vessel to the during the voyage for the preservation of the vessel,
insurer and claim for whole insured cargo, or both; and all damages to the vessel and
value (Sec. 141, Insurance Code); or cargo from the time it is loaded and the voyage
b. He may, without abandoning vessel, commenced, until it ends and the cargo is unloaded.
claim for partial actual loss (Sec. 157,
Insurance Code). b. Fire
The word “may” in Section1 141 is intended to grant Fire Insurance Defined
the insured the option or direction to make the It is a contract of indemnity by which the insurer for
choice. This option or discretion is expressed as a a consideration agrees to indemnify the insured
right in Section 133. (Keppel Cebu Shipyard v. against loss of, or damage to, property by fire. (Sec.
Pioneer Ins. & Surety, G.R. Nos. 180880-81, 2009) 169, Insurance Code)
Accidental Thus, the acceptance does not give the surety the
That which happens by chance or fortuitously, right to intervene in the principal contract. (Asset
without intention or design, which is unexpected, Builders Corporation vs. Stronghold Insurance Co.,
unusual and unforeseen (Sun Insurance v. CA, G.R. Inc., G.R. No. 187116, 2010).
No. 92383, 1992)
Suretyship v. Property Insurance
NOTE: The terms “accident” and “accidental” do SURETYSHIP PROPERTY
not, without qualification, exclude events resulting in INSURANCE
damage or loss due to fault, recklessness or
negligence of third parties. (Pan Malayan Insurance Accessory contract Principal contract
v. CA, G.R. No. 81026, 1990)
Parties: Parties:
Surety is entitled to In subrogation, the 3rd It has also been defined as a mutual agreement by
reimbursement from party against whom which a party agrees to pay a given sum on the
the principal and his the insurer may happening of a particular event contingent on the
guarantors for the loss proceed is not a party duration of human life, in consideration of the
it may suffer under the to the contract payment of a smaller sum immediately, or in
contract periodical payments by the other party. (De Leon,
The Insurance Code Annotated, 2019)
Generally, can only be May be cancelled
cancelled with the unilaterally either by Essentially, life insurance is a contract to make
consent of the oblige the insured or by the specific payments to pay to a certain person, the
or by the Comm’r or by insurer on grounds beneficiary, upon the death of a person whose life
a court of competent provided by law (Sec. has been insured.
jurisdiction 64)
Parties involved in a policy of life insurance
The obligee must The insurance 1. Insurer
accept before the contract does not Owner of the policy, who has the power to name or
suretyship becomes need the acceptance change the beneficiary, to assign the policy, and the
valid and enforceable of any 3rd party obligation to pay the premiums;
2. Insured
Rules on Payment of Premium
Person whose life is the subject of the policy, also
The premium is the consideration for furnishing the
known as the cestui que vie; and
bond or the guaranty and the obligation to pay the
same subsists for as long as the liability of the surety
3. Beneficiary
shall exist. (Reparations Commission v. Universal
The beneficiary to whom the proceeds are paid.
Deep-Sea Fishing Corporation, A.M. No. 219091-
96, 1978)
Liability of Insurer in Case of Suicide
1. When liable:
1. The premium becomes a debt as soon as
a. The suicide is committed after the
the contract of suretyship or bond is
policy has been in force for a
perfected and delivered to the obligor (Sec.
period of two (2) years from the
78, Insurance Code)
date of its issue or of its last
reinstatement;
2. The contract of suretyship or bonding shall
b. (b) The suicide is committed after
not be valid and binding unless and until the
a shorter period (e.g. one year)
premium therefor has been paid;
provided in the policy although
within the two (2) year period; and
3. Where the obligee has accepted the bond,
c. The suicide is committed in the
it shall be valid and enforceable
state of insanity regardless of the
notwithstanding that the premium has not
date of commission, unless suicide
been paid (Philippine Pryce Assurance v.
is an excepted risk
CA, G.R. No. 107062, 1994);
2. When not liable
a. The suicide is not by reason of
NOTE: Where a contract of surety is terminated
insanity and is committed within
under its terms, the liability of the principal for
the two-year period;
premiums after such termination ceases
b. The suicide is by reason of insanity
notwithstanding the pendency of a lawsuit to enforce
but is not among the risks
a liability that accrued during its stipulated lifetime
assumed by the insurer regardless
(Capital Insurance & Surety Co v. Ronquillo Trading,
of the date of commission; and
G.R. No. L-36488, 1983).
vehicle in which the occupant is riding, mounting, or from denial of the claim, otherwise, the claimant’s
dismounting from. right of action shall prescribe. (Sec. 397, Insurance
Code)
The claimant is not free to choose from which
insurer he will claim the “no-fault indemnity” as the If a claim be made and rejected and an action or suit
law, by using the word “shall,” makes it mandatory be not commenced either in the IC or any court of
that the claim be made against the insurer of such competent jurisdiction within twelve (12) months
vehicle. from receipt of notice of such rejection, then the
claim shall be deemed to have been abandoned and
That said vehicle might not be the one that caused shall not be recoverable. (J. Hernando: Alpha Plus
the accident is of no moment since the law itself International Enterprises Corp. v. Philippine Charter
provides that the party paying the claim may recover Insurance Corp., G.R. No. 203756, 2021)
against the owner of the vehicle responsible for the
accident. h. Compulsory Insurance
Coverage for Agency-Hired
This is precisely the essence of the “no-fault Workers
indemnity” insurance which was introduced in order
to provide victims of vehicular accidents or their Scope; At No Cost
heirs immediate compensation although in a limited
Each migrant worker deployed by a recruitment
amount, pending final determination of who is
or manning agency shall be covered by a
responsible for the accident and liable for the
victim’s injuries or death. So, it is immaterial whether compulsory insurance policy which shall be
or not fault or negligence lies with the other vehicle secured at no cost to the said worker.
involved in the incident. (De Leon, The Insurance
Code Annotated, 2019) On the other hand, insurance coverage is not
mandatory for direct-hired or name-hired, and
Claim against insurer of vehicle responsible for rehired OFWs.
accident
In any other case (i.e. the victim is not an occupant An OFW is direct-hired or name-hired if s/he
of a vehicle), the claim shall lie against the insurer was engaged directly by foreign employers
of the directly offending vehicle. (De Leon, The such as international organizations, diplomatic
Insurance Code Annotated, 2019) corps, and those who were able to get an
employment without the assistance or
Note that Sec. 386 (par. iii) of the Insurance Code participation of any recruitment/manning
uses the general term “occupant” to distinguish it agency.
from a “passenger” and a “third party.” (Sec. 386[b
and c], Insurance Code). Thus, as used, “occupant” A rehired OFW is one who has been re-
includes both a “passenger” and a “third party” so engaged by the foreign principal without the
long as they are riding in or mounting or dismounting
participation of an agency.
from a motor vehicle. (De Leon, The Insurance
Code Annotated, 2019, citing Perla Compania de
Seguors, Inc. vs. Ancheta 164 SCRA 144 [1988]). Direct-hired, name-hired, or rehired OFWs,
however, can avail themselves of this
Prescription insurance by requesting their foreign employers
Any person having any claim upon the policy to pay for the cost of the insurance coverage or
issued pursuant to this chapter shall, without any they may pay for the premium themselves.
unnecessary delay, present to the insurance (Eastern Overseas Employment Center, Inc. v.
company concerned a written notice of claim Heirs of Odulio, G.R. No. 240950 (Resolution),
setting forth the nature, extent and duration of the [July 29, 2020])
injuries sustained as certified by a duly licensed
physician. Coverage
Such insurance policy shall be effective for the
Notice of claim must be filed within six (6) months duration of the migrant worker's employment
from the date of accident, otherwise, the claim and shall cover, at the minimum:
shall be deemed waived. 1. Accidental death, with at least Fifteen
thousand United States dollars
Action or suit for recovery of damage due to loss or (US$10,000.00) survivor's benefit
injury must be brought, in proper cases, with the
Commissioner or the courts within one (1) year
Jurisdiction of Insurance Commission over Note: A creditor may insure his debtor’s life for the
claims, questions, disputes purpose of protecting his debt, but only to the extent
Any question or dispute in the enforcement of of the amount of the debt and the cost of carrying
any insurance policy issued under this Rule the insurance on the debtor’s life.
shall be brought before the IC for mediation or
adjudication. (Sec. 11 of R.A. 10022) d. Any person upon whose life any
estate or interest vested in him
depends. (Sec. 10, Insurance Code)
4. Insurable Interest
Life Insurance v. Civil Donation
a. Definition and Nature
Insurable Interest LIFE INSURANCE CIVIL DONATION
Interest which the law requires the owner of an
insurance policy to have in the thing or person
insured. This is also founded An act of liberality
on liberality, as the whereby a person
General Rule: It is pecuniary in nature. beneficiary will receive disposes gratuitously
the proceeds of the a thing or right in favor
A person is deemed to have an insurable interest in said insurance. of another who
the subject matter insured where he has a relation accepts it.
or connection with or concern in it that he will derive
pecuniary benefit or advantage from its preservation
and will suffer pecuniary loss or damage from its
destruction, termination or injury by the happening
As a consequence, the proscription in Civil Code,
of the event insured against. (Lalican v. Insular Life
Art. 739 should equally operate in life insurance
Insurance Co, G.R. No. 183526, 2009)
contracts (Insular Life v. Ebrado, G.R. No. L-44059,
1977)
b. Distinguishing Life From Non-
Life (Property) Insurance Beneficiary
Person who is named or designated in a contract of
Exception: Life Insurance life, health, or accident insurance as the one who is
to receive the benefits which become payable,
The expectation of benefit from the continued life of according to the terms of the contract, upon the
that person need not necessarily be of pecuniary death of the insured (44 Am. Jur. 2d. 639 cited in de
nature. Leon, 2010, p. 96).
LGBTQ+ members have the right to designate their b. If no other beneficiaries, in accordance with
domestic partners as beneficiaries. An individual the policy contract; (e.g. to the contingent
who has secured a life insurance policy on his or her or substitute of beneficiaries)
own life may designate any person as beneficiary c. If the policy contract is silent, to the estate
provided that such designation does not fall under of the insured. (Sec. 12, Insurance Code)
the enumerations provided in Article 739 of the Civil
Code. (Insurance Commission, Legal Opinion No. 2. In Property
2020-02, dated March 04, 2020) Coverage of Insurable Interest in Property
1. Property itself;
When is the estate entitled to the proceeds of the 2. Any relation thereto; or
insurance? 3. Liability in respect thereof (Sec. 13,
1. Where the insured has not designated any Insurance Code)
beneficiary; or
2. When the designated beneficiary is It may consist of:
disqualified by law to receive the proceeds 1. An existing interest;
(Heirs of Maramag v. Maramag, G.R. No. 2. An inchoate interest founded on an existing
181132, 2009) interest; or
3. An expectancy, coupled with an existing
Note: interest in that out of which the expectancy
1. The designation is revocable unless the arises
right to revoke is expressly waived in the
policy. Measure of Insurable Interest in Property
2. If the insured or beneficiary is a minor, and The extent to which the insured might be damnified
the amount involved does not exceed by loss or injury thereof.
P50,000.00, the father, or in his absence or
incapacity, the mother may exercise the In general, a person has an insurable interest in the
minor’s rights under the policy, without the property, if he derives pecuniary benefit or
need of a court authority or a bond. advantage from its preservation or would suffer
3. If the premiums are paid out of the conjugal pecuniary loss, damage or prejudice by its
funds, the proceeds are considered destruction whether he has or has no title in, or lien
conjugal. upon, or possession of the property. Hence,
pecuniary interest over the property is always
If the beneficiary is other than the insured’s estate, necessary.
the source of premiums (either from paraphernal or
conjugal funds) would not be relevant (BPI v. Existence of insurable interest is a matter of public
Posadas, G.R. No. L-34583, 1931). policy. Hence, the principle of estoppel cannot be
invoked.
Right of Insured to Change Beneficiary in Life
Insurance Insurable Interest in Life v. Property
General Rule: The insured shall have the right to
LIFE PROPERTY
change the beneficiary he designated in the policy.
(Sec. 11, Insurance Code)
BASIS
Exception: If the insured expressly waived his right May be based on Based on pecuniary
to change the beneficiary, this makes the latter an pecuniary interest, interest.
irrevocable beneficiary. But despite the waiver, he affinity, or
can still change the beneficiary, provided that he consanguinity.
obtains the beneficiary’s consent. (Sec. 11,
Insurance Code) WHEN INTEREST MUST EXIST
Forfeiture by Beneficiary of Interest in Insurance In life insurance (save Must exist when the
Policy that effected by insurance takes effect
The interest of a beneficiary in a life insurance policy creditor on life of and when the loss
shall be forfeited when the beneficiary is the debtor), it is enough occurs, but need not
principal, accomplice, or accessory in willfully that insurable interest exist in the meantime.
bringing about the death of the insured; in which exists at the time the
event, the share forfeited shall be paid as follows: policy takes effect and
a. To the other beneficiaries if not disqualified;
Insurance by Mortgagor for the Benefit of Double insurance exists where the same person is
Mortgagee, or Policy Assigned to the insured by several insurers separately in respect to
Mortgagee: the same subject and interest.
The insurance is still deemed to be upon the interest
of the mortgagor who does not cease to be a party Note: It is not prohibited by law. But it may be
to the original contract. contractually prohibited by a provision in an
insurance policy.
Any act of the mortgagor, prior to the loss, which
would otherwise avoid the insurance, will have the Over insurance exists when the amount of the
same effects, although the property is in the hands insurance is beyond the value of the insured’s
of the mortgagee. insurable interest.
Any act, which under the contract of insurance is to When there is double insurance and over insurance
be performed by the mortgagor, may be performed results, the insured can claim in case of loss only up
by the mortgagee with the same effect as if it has to the agreed valuation or up to the full insurable
been performed by the mortgagor. value from any, some or all insurers, without
prejudice to the insurers ratably apportioning the
Upon the occurrence of the loss, the mortgagee is payments. Insured can also recover before or after
entitled to recover to the extent of his credit and the the loss, from both insurers the excess premium he
balance, if any, is payable to the mortgagor since has paid.
such policy is for the benefit of both the mortgagor
and mortgagee. Requisites of Double Insurance:
1. The person injured is the same;
Upon recovery of the mortgagee to the extent of his 2. There are two or more insurers insuring
credit from the insurer, the mortgagor is released separately;
from his indebtedness. 3. The subject matter is the same;
4. The interest insured is also the same;
Insurance by Mortgagee of His Own Interest 5. The risk or peril insured against is likewise
The mortgagee may collect from the insurer upon the same.
the occurrence of the loss to the extent of his credit.
Double Insurance v. Over insurance
Unless otherwise stated in the policy, the mortgagor
DOUBLE OVER INSURANCE
has no right to collect the balance of the proceeds
INSURANCE
of the policy after payment of the interest of the
mortgagee.
There may be no over Amount of insurance
The insurer, upon payment to the mortgagee-
insurance as when the is beyond the value of
insured, becomes subrogated to the rights of the
sum total of the the insured’s
mortgagee against the mortgagor and may collect
amounts of the insurable interest.
the debt of the mortgagor to the extent of the amount
policies issued does
paid to the mortgagee.
not exceed the
insurable interest of
Standard or Union Mortgage Clause
the insured.
If a fire insurance policy contains this, the acts of the
mortgagor do not affect the mortgagee. It makes a
separate and distinct contract of insurance on the
Several insurers May have only one
interest of the mortgagee.
involved. insurer involved.
Open or Loss-Payable Mortgage Clause
It is a contract which provides that the payment of
loss to the mortgagee, if any, will be according to his Reinsurance
interest as it may appear in the contract. Under such One by which an insurer procures a third person to
clause, the acts of the mortgagor will affect the insure him against loss or liability by reason of such
mortgagee. original insurance. In every reinsurance contract,
the original contract of insurance and the contract of
5. Double Insurance And Over reinsurance are separate and distinct and covered
insurance by separate policies. The original insured has no
interest in a contract of reinsurance.
Insured in the 1st Original insured has no Right of Insurer Paying “No Fault Indemnity”
contract is a party in interest in reinsurance In all cases, the right of the party paying the claim to
interest in the 2nd contract. recover against the owner of the vehicle responsible
contract. for the accident shall be maintained.
The "no fault indemnity" provision is part of the Effects and Purpose of Incontestability
provisions on compulsory motor vehicle liability When all requisites are present, the insurer can no
insurance and should be read together with the longer escape liability nor be allowed to prove that
requirement for compulsory passenger and/ or third the policy is void ab initio or rescindable.
party-liability insurance which was mandated in
order to ensure ready compensation for victims of The insurer is precluded from contesting the policy
vehicular accidents. on any ground.
reinstated policy should be viewed as a new Right of the Injured Person to Sue Insurer of
contract. the Party at Fault
SCENARIO EFFECT
Thus, where the insurer asserts that the
reinstatement was obtained through fraud, he may
raise this defense at any time before the expiration The contract provides 3rd persons, to whom
of the contest period, reckoned from the date of for indemnity against the insured is liable,
reinstatement. liability to 3rd persons. CAN sue the insurer.
When the insured concealed in the application for
reinstatement the fact that she had been suffering
for at least 3 years from bronchial asthma, the
period of incontestability should be computed from
the date of reinstatement. The contract is for 3rd persons CANNOT
indemnity against proceed against the
b. No Fault Clauses In Casualty actual loss or insured.
payment.
Insurance
It is an insurance covering loss or liability arising (Guingon v. Del Monte, G.R. No. L-22042, 1967)
from accident or mishap, excluding those falling
under those types of insurance such as fire, NOTE: The injured person may sue the insurer and
suretyship, life or marine. (Sec. 176, Insurance the person at fault, notwithstanding the stipulation
Code) against suing the insurer (“no-action” clause) in the
policy. (Guingon v. Del Monte, G.R. No. L-22042,
Accident or Health Insurance 1967)
Insurance against specified perils which may affect
the person and/or property of the insured. (ex. NOTE: Where casualty insurance insures against
Personal Accident, Robbery/Theft Insurance) liability, then an injured third party may have direct
recourse against the insurance. On the other hand,
Third Party Liability Insurance if the casualty insurance insures against loss, then
Insurance against specified perils which may give an injured third party will not be able to directly sue
rise to liability on the party of the insured for claims the insurer.
for injuries to or damage to property of others. (ex.
Motor Vehicle Liability, Professional Liability, Rules as to Death or Injury Resulting from
Product Liability) Accidental Means
3. The following proofs of loss, when Note: In all cases, the right of the party paying the
submitted under oath, shall be sufficient claim to recover against the owner of the vehicle
evidence to substantiate the claim: responsible for the accident shall be maintained.
1. Police report of accident; and (Sec. 391, Insurance Code)
2. Death certificate and evidence
sufficient to establish the proper d. Liability Of Insurer In Case Of
payee; or, Suicide Or Death
3. Medical report and evidence or
medical or hospital disbursement 1. Suicide
in respect of which refund is The insurer is LIABLE in the following cases:
claimed. 1. Suicide was committed after the policy has
4. Claim may be made against one motor been in force for a period of two years from
vehicle only; the date of its issue or its last reinstatement;
1. Against the insurer of the vehicle 2. Suicide committed in a state of insanity
where one is a passenger regardless of the date of the commission of
2. in any other case, the offending the suicide; or
vehicle 3. If committed after the lapse of a shorter
period in the policy (Sec. 183, Insurance
Claimant Code)
The claimant or victim may be a “passenger” or a
“third party” (Sec. 391, Insurance Code) NOTE: Any stipulation extending the two-year
period is void.
1. Passenger
Any fare paying person being transported and The insurer is NOT liable in the following cases:
conveyed in and by a motor vehicle for 1. The suicide is not by reason of insanity and
transportation of passengers for compensation, is committed within the two-year period;
including persons expressly authorized by law or 2. The suicide is by reason of insanity but is
by the vehicle’s operator or his agents to ride not among the risks assumed by the insurer
without fare. (Insurance Code, Sec. 386[b]] regardless of the date of commission; and
3. The insurer can show that the policy was
2. Third Party obtained with the intention to commit
Any person other than a passenger as defined in suicide even in the absence of any suicide
this section and shall also exclude a member of exclusion in the policy.
the household, or a member of the family within
the second degree of consanguinity or affinity, of 2. Killing by the Beneficiary
a motor vehicle owner or land transportation General Rule: The interest of a beneficiary in a life
operator, as likewise defined herein, or his insurance policy shall be forfeited when the
employee in respect of death, bodily injury, or beneficiary is the principal, accomplice, or
damage to property arising out of and in the accessory in willfully bringing about the death of the
course of employment (Sec. 386[c], Insurance insured. In such a case, the share forfeited shall
Code) pass on to the other beneficiaries, unless otherwise
disqualified. In the absence of other beneficiaries,
Proper Insurer to Claim From the proceeds shall be paid in accordance with the
In the case of an occupant of a vehicle, claim shall policy contract. If the policy contract is silent, the
lie against the insurer of the vehicle in which the proceeds shall be paid to the estate of the insured.
occupant is riding, mounting or dismounting from. (Sec. 12, Insurance Code)
If not an occupant, claim shall lie against the insurer
of the directly offending vehicle. Exceptions:
1. Accidental killing;
The claimant is not free to choose from which 2. Self-defense; and
insurer he will claim the "no-fault indemnity" as the 3. Insanity of the beneficiary at the time he
law, by using the word "shall," makes it mandatory killed the insured
that the claim be made against the insurer of such
vehicle. That said vehicle might not be the one that e. Incontestability Clauses
caused the accident is of no moment since the law In relation to the time to exercise the right to rescind
itself provides that the party paying the claim may the insurance contract, it shall be made prior to the
recover against the owner of the vehicle responsible commencement of an action on the contract, if it be
for the accident. (Perla Compania de Seguros v.
Ancheta, G.R. No. L-49699 August 8, 1988)
a Non-Life Policy, and before the incontestability either accepted or rejected, it is merely a proposal
clause sets in, if it be a Life Policy. or an offer to make a contract. (Perez v. CA, G.R.
No. 112329, 2000)
Requisites of Incontestability Clause:
1. The insurance is a life insurance policy. Also, according to Enriquez v. Sun Life Assurance
2. It is payable on the death of the insured. (G.R. No. L-15895, 1920):
3. It has been in force during the lifetime of the 1. Submission of application, even with
insured for at least 2 years from its date of premium payment is a mere offer on the
issue or of its last reinstatement. part of the applicant, and does not bind the
insurer;
NOTE: The period of 2 years may be shortened but 2. An insurance contract is also not perfected
it cannot be extended by stipulation. where the applicant dies before the
approval of his application or it does not
When incontestability clause sets in appear that the acceptance of the
Whichever is earlier, between: application ever came to the knowledge of
1. Within 2 years from the date of issuance or the applicant;
its last reinstatement; or 3. An acceptance made by letter shall not bind
2. Upon the insurer’s death (Sun Life v. Sibya, the person making the offer except from the
G.R. No. 211212, 2016) time it came to his knowledge.
After the two-year period lapses, or when the a. Offer And Acceptance/
insured dies within the period, the insurer must Consensuality
make good on the policy, even though the policy
was obtained by fraud, concealment, or Delay in Acceptance
misrepresentation (Sun Life v. Sibya, G.R. No. A contract of insurance, like other contracts, must
211212, 2016). be assented to by the parties either in person, or by
their agents. Under the law, assent or consent is
Defenses Not Barred by Incontestability Clause: manifested by the meeting of the offer and the
1. Person taking the insurance lacked acceptance upon the thing and the cause which are
insurable interest as required by law; to constitute the contract. If an application has not
2. Cause of the death of the insured is been either accepted or rejected, there is no
excepted risk; contract yet as it is merely and offer or proposal (De
3. Premiums have not been paid; Leon, The Insurance Code Annotated, 2014)
4. Conditions of the policy relating to military
or naval service have been violated; Delivery of the Policy
5. The fraud is of a particularly vicious type, The delivery of a policy is not, however, a
wherein: prerequisite to a valid contract of insurance. The
1. The policy was taken in contract may be completed prior to delivery of the
furtherance of a scheme to murder policy or even without delivery of the policy
the insured; depending on the intention of the parties. (De Leon,
2. The insured instituted another The Insurance Code Annotated, 2014)
person for the medical
examination; and, b. Premium Payment
3. The beneficiary feloniously killed
the insured; Premium
6. Beneficiary failed to furnish proof of death Premium is the consideration paid to an insurer for
or to comply with any condition imposed by undertaking to indemnify the insured against a
the policy after the loss has happened; or, specified peril.
7. Action was not brought within the time
specified. An insurer is entitled to payment of the premium as
soon as the thing insured is exposed to the peril
B. PERFECTION OF THE INSURANCE insured against.
CONTRACT
Effect of Non-Payment of Premium
Consensual Nature of Contract General Rule:
A contract of insurance must be assented to by both Non-payment of first premium - Prevents the
parties, either in person or through their agents and contract from becoming binding notwithstanding the
so long as an application for insurance has not been
acceptance of the application or the issuance of the e. Where the parties are barred by
policy. estoppel. (Jose Marques, et al. vs. Far
But non-payment of the balance of the premium due East Bank and Trust Company, et al. /
does not produce the cancellation of the contract. Far East Bank and Trust Company, et
(Phil. Phoenix Surety & Insurance v. Woodworks, al. vs. Jose Marques, et al. G.R. No.
G.R. No. L-22684, Aug. 31, 1967). 171379/G.R. No. 171419, 2011).
Subsequent premiums - Does not affect the Given the provisions of the Insurance Code, which
validity of the contracts unless, by express is a special law, the applicable rate of interest shall
stipulation, it is provided that the policy shall in that be that imposed in a loan or forbearance of money
event be suspended or shall lapse. as imposed by the BSP. The unpaid amount due
from insurer is a forbearance of money. So, the
Exceptions: proper rate applies (Stronghold Insurance Co., Inc.
a. In case of life and industrial life v. Pamana Island Resort Hotel and Marina Club,
whenever the grace period provision Inc., G.R. No. 174838, 2016).
applies.
But NOTE: In the case of Chartis Philippines
Individual Life or Endowment Insurance Inc. v. Cyber City Teleservices Ltd
Insurance and Group Life Insurance (G.R. No 234299), the Supreme Court discussed a
Grace period of either thirty (30) days or useful evaluation of Section 77 of the Insurance
one (1) month within which the payment Code. The essential rules worth noting are as
of any premium after the first may be follows:
made 1. If the insured paid the premium, the
insurer's liability attaches correspondingly.
Industrial Life Insurance a. There is a valid and binding policy
Grace period is four (4) weeks, and or contract of insurance and the
where premiums are payable monthly, insured may demand
either thirty (30) days or one (1) month. indemnification in case of loss.
b. There is no credit on the premium
b. Where there is an acknowledgement in to speak of and, therefore, none
the contract or policy of insurance that which the insurer can demand
the premium had already been paid. because he has already been
(Insurance Code, Sec. 79) paid.
2. If the insured did not pay the premium and
c. There is an agreement allowing the the parties did not agree that the insurer's
insured to pay the premium in liability has attached, then there is no valid
installments and partial payment has or binding contract of insurance.
been made at the time of loss (Makati a. The insured cannot demand
Tuscany Condominium v. Court of indemnification if loss occurs and
Appeals, G.R. No. 95546, 1992) neither can the insurer demand
payment of the premium.
Cf. Where the policy provides for 3. If the insured did not actually pay the
payment in premium in full before the premium but the parties have agreed that
“policy shall be deemed effective, valid, the insurer's liability has attached, then the
and binding upon the company” – the insured is considered to have extended
partial payment is merely treated as a credit on the premium.
deposit and does not make the policy a. When the insured accepts the
binding. (Sps. Tibay v. CA, G.R. No. terms of the credit, there is a valid
119655, 1996) and binding contract of insurance.
b. The insured must pay the premium
d. Where a credit term was agreed upon before the end of the credit term;
like the agreement in where the insurer otherwise, he cannot demand
granted a 60-90-day credit term for the indemnification in case of loss.
payment of the premiums despite full c. The insurer may demand the
awareness of Section 77 (UCPB premium, whether or not loss
General Insurance, Inc. v. Masagana occurred.
Telemart, G.R. No. 137172, 1999)
approved by the Commissioner. (Sec. 232, adhesion which must be construed liberally in favor
Insurance Code) of the insured (The Insular Life Assurance Company
v. Paz Khu, G.R. No. 195176, 2016).
Delivery
The best evidence that a contract has been entered Riders/Endorsements
into between the insurer and the insured is the Attachment to an insurance policy that modifies the
DELIVERY of the policy by the insurer to the conditions of the policy by expanding or restricting
insured. its benefits or excluding certain conditions from the
coverage.
Reinstatement of a Lapsed Policy
A provision that the policyholder shall be entitled to Formal Requirements of Riders
have the policy reinstated at any time within three Riders, together with other attachments to the
years from the date of default of premium payment policy, like clause, warranty or endorsements, are
unless the cash surrender value has been duly paid, not binding on the insured unless:
or the extension period has expired, upon 1. The descriptive title or name thereof is
production of evidence of insurability satisfactory to mentioned and written on the blank spaces
the company and upon payment of all overdue provided in the policy and;
premiums and any indebtedness to the company 2. Countersigned by insured or owner.
upon said policy, with interest rate not exceeding
that which would have been applicable to said Exception: No need to countersign if the rider
premiums and indebtedness in the policy years prior or other attachment is applied for by the insured
to reinstatement. or owner of the policy.
upon at least seven (7) days’ notice to the 2. Making or proposing to make, as surety,
other party. any contract of suretyship as a vocation
e. If a cover note is not so cancelled, a policy and not as merely incidental to any other
of insurance shall, within sixty (60) days legitimate business or activity of the surety;
after the issuance of such cover note, be 3. Doing any kind of business, including a
issued in lieu thereof. Such policy shall reinsurance business, specifically
include within its terms the identical recognized as constituting the doing of an
insurance bond under the cover note and insurance business within the meaning of
the premium. this Code;
f. Cover notes may be extended or renewed 4. Doing or proposing to do any business in
beyond such sixty (60) days with the written substance equivalent to any of the
approval of the Commissioner if he foregoing in a manner designed to evade
determines that such extension is not the provisions of this Code.
contrary to and is not for the purpose of
violating any provisions of this Code. The In the application of the provisions of this Code, the
Commissioner may promulgate rules and fact that no profit is derived from the making of
regulations governing such extensions for insurance contracts, agreements or transactions or
the purpose of preventing such violations that no separate or direct consideration is received
and may by such rules and regulations therefor, shall not be deemed conclusive to show
dispense with the requirement of written that the making thereof does not constitute the doing
approval by him in the case of extension in or transacting of an insurance business. (Section
compliance with such rules and 2(b), Insurance Code)
regulations. (Section 52, Insurance Code)
g. Insurance companies may impose on cover Rights and Obligations of Insurer
notes a deposit premium equivalent to at An insurer is the party who assumes or accepts the
least 25% of the estimated premium of the risk of loss in an insurance contract. An insurer
intended insurance coverage but in no case undertakes for a consideration to indemnify the
less than P500.00. (Ins. Cir. Letter, Jan. 17, insured or to pay him a certain sum on the
1980.) (De Leon, The Insurance Code of happening of a specified contingency or event.
the Philippines Annotated [2014])
As such, an insurer has the right to receive
The fact that no separate premium was paid on the premiums to be paid by the insured.
cover note before the loss insured against occurred, ● Notwithstanding any agreement to the
does not militate against its binding effect as an contrary, no policy or contract of insurance
insurance contract. By their nature, cover notes do issued by an insurance company is valid
not contain particulars that would serve as basis for and binding unless and until the premium
the computation of the premiums and consequently, thereof has been paid, except in the case
no separate premiums are intended or required to of a life or an industrial life policy whenever
be paid therefor (Pacific Timber Export Corp. v. CA, the grace period provision applies, or
G.R. No. L-38613, 1982) whenever under the broker and agency
agreements with duly licensed
C. RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF intermediaries, a ninety (90)-day credit
PARTIES extension is given.
● No credit extension to a duly licensed
intermediary should exceed ninety (90)
1. Insurer
days from date of issuance of the policy.
(Sec. 77, Insurance Code)
Meaning of Insurer
Every corporation, partnership, or association, duly
authorized to transact insurance business as
2. Insured
elsewhere provided in this Code may be an insurer.
Meaning of Insured
(Section 6, Insurance Code)
The insured is a person to be indemnified, or one
The term doing an insurance business or who is to receive a certain sum upon happening of
a specified contingency or event.
transacting an insurance business, within the
meaning of this Code, shall include:
1. Making or proposing to make, as insurer, Anyone except a public enemy may be insured.
(Section 7, Insurance Code)
any insurance contract;
unpaid indebtedness and does not make the and without reference to whether
mortgagee a party to the contract. the insurer was in fact prejudiced
by such untruth or non-fulfilment
Open Mortgage Clause renders the policy voidable by the
If an insurer assents to the transfer of an insurance insurer.
from a mortgagor to a mortgagee, and, at the time d. Conditions
of his assent, imposes further obligations on the e. Exceptions
assignee, making a new contract with him, the acts i. Stipulations excluding certain
of the mortgagor cannot affect the rights of said specified risks that otherwise
assignee. (Section 9, Insurance Code) would be included under the
general language describing the
Essentially, when the mortgagor insures the risks assumed.
property mortgaged and makes the loss payable to
the mortgagee, the mortgagor does not cease to be 2. Concealment
a party to the contract and thus, any act of his which
would avoid the policy shall have the same effect. Definition
A neglect to communicate that which a party knows
Union Mortgage Clause and ought to communicate (Section 26, Insurance
A union mortgage clause, or its equivalent, creates Code)
the relation of insured and insurer between the
mortgagee and the insurance company Requisites of Concealment (KDNA)
independent of the contract with the mortgagor. a. A party knows the fact which he neglects to
communicate or disclose to the other;
If an insurer assents to the transfer of an insurance b. Such party concealing is duty bound to
from the mortgagor to the mortgagee, at the time of disclose such fact to the other;
his assent, imposes further obligations on the c. Such party concealing makes no warranty
assignee, making a new contract with him, the act of the fact concealed; and
of the mortgagor cannot affect the rights of said d. The other party has not the means of
assignee. ascertaining the fact concealed.
insurance by a withholding of material information or him without knowledge of its incorrectness and
facts within the assured’s knowledge or presumed without any deliberate intent on his part to mislead
knowledge? (Argente v. West Coast Life, G.R. No. the insurer. (Ng Zee v. Asian Crusader, G.R. No. L-
L-24899, 1928) 30685, 1983)
Where the insured lacked sufficient medical The fraudulent intent on the part of the insured must
knowledge as to enable him to distinguish between be established to entitle the insurer to rescind the
“peptic ulcer” and “tumor” the insured cannot claim contract. Misrepresentation as a defense of the
that he was deceived into entering into the contract. insurer to avoid liability is an affirmative defense and
the duty to establish such defense by satisfactory
In the absence of evidence that the insured had and convincing evidence rests upon the insurer.
sufficient medical knowledge as to enable him to (Manulife Philippines v. Ybanez, G.R. No. 204736,
distinguish between "peptic ulcer" and a "tumor," his 2016)
statement that said tumor was "associated with
peptic ulcer of the stomach" should be construed as Kinds of Representation
an expression made in good faith of his belief as to 1. Affirmative - an affirmation of a fact
the nature of his ailment and operation. Such existing when the contracts begins; or
statement must be presumed to have been made by
2. Promissory - a statement by the insured Usually occurs prior to May be made at the
concerning what is to happen during the making of the time of the insurance
term of the insurance. insurance contract. of the contract.
In cases of rescission In cases of rescission
Effect of Expressions of Opinion or Expectation due to concealment, due to misrepresentat-
on Insurance Policy proof of fraudulent ion, proof of fraudulent
A representation of the expectation, intention, belief, intent not necessary intent necessary
opinion or judgment of the insured, although false,
WILL NOT AVOID a policy of insurance if there is The Insurance Code dispenses with proof of
no actual fraud in inducing the acceptance of the fraudulent intent in cases of rescission due to
risk, or its acceptance at a lower rate of premium concealment, but not so in cases of rescission due
(Philam Health Systems v. CA, G.R. No. 125678, to false representations. Concealment of material
2002); facts is fraudulent in and of itself. (The Insular Life
Assurance Co., Ltd. v. Heirs of Alvarez, G.R. Nos.
However, in a marine insurance, information of the 207526 & 210156, 2018)
belief or expectation of a third person, in reference
to a material fact, is material. (Section 110, 4. Breach Of Warranties
Insurance Code)
Definition
Adoption of Misrepresentation A statement or promise set forth in the policy or by
An insured who signed the pension plan application, reference incorporated therein, the untruth or
adopted as his own the written representations and nonfulfillment of which in any respect, and without
declarations embodied in it (Ma. Lourdes S. reference to whether insurer was in fact prejudiced
Florendo vs. Philam Plans, Inc., Perla Abcede, et by such untruth or non-fulfillment, renders the policy
al., G.R. No. 186983, 2012). VOIDABLE by the insurer.
Warranty v. Representations
Concealment vs Misrepresentation WARRANTY REPRESENTATION
CONCEALMENT MISREPRESENTATION
Part of the contract. Collateral inducement.
The insured withholds The insured makes
information of material erroneous statements
facts from the insurer. of facts with the intent Written on the policy or Need not be written.
of inducing the insurer in a valid rider or
to enter into the attachment. (except
insurance contract. for implied warranties)
Passive form of the Active form of the act. Generally, Should be established
act. conclusively to be material.
presumed to be
material.
Exception: The below instances of warranties After the two-year period lapses, or when the
relating to the future insured dies within the period, the insurer must
a. Loss occurs before the time of performance make good on the policy, even though the policy
of the warranty; was obtained by fraud, concealment, or
b. The performance becomes unlawful; misrepresentation (Sun Life v. Sibya, G.R. No.
c. Performance becomes impossible. (Sec. 211212, 2016).
73, Insurance Code)
Defenses Not Barred by the Incontestability
Note: Waiver or estoppel may also prevent the Clause
insurer from being discharged from liability (Pioneer a. Person taking the insurance lacked
v. Yap, G.R. No. L-36232, 1974) insurable interest as required by law;
b. Cause of the death of the insured is
Other Insurance Clause – This is a clause in the excepted risk;
policy that provides that the policy shall be void if the c. Premiums have not been paid;
insured procures additional insurance without the d. Conditions of the policy relating to military
consent of the insurer. The purpose is to prevent or naval service have been violated;
over-insurance and thus to avert the possibility of a e. The fraud is of a particularly vicious type,
perpetration of fraud. It is a warranty that entitles the wherein:
insurer to rescind in case of breach. i. The policy was taken in
furtherance of a scheme to murder
The “other insurance clause” may be subject to the insured;
waiver but the waiver must either be express or if it ii. The insured instituted another
is to be implied from conduct mainly, said conduct person for the medical
must be clearly indicative of a clear intent to waive examination; and,
such right. There must be clear showing that the iii. The beneficiary feloniously killed
insurer knew about the violation of the clause the insured;
(General Insurance and Surety Corp. v. Ng Hua, f. Beneficiary failed to furnish proof of death
G.R. No 14373, 1960). or to comply with any condition imposed by
the policy after the loss has happened; or,
5. Exercise Of The Right To Rescind g. Action was not brought within the time
Or Cancel specified.
Carriage of Goods
(a) Shipper: A person who delivers the goods
to the carrier for transportation and pays the
consideration, or on whose behalf the
payment is made
(c) Carrier: A party who binds himself to
transport persons, goods, or both. It may be
a common carrier or a private carrier
(d) Consignee: Party who receives the goods
or cargo or someone for whose benefit the
contract was taken.The consignee and the and one who does such carrying of goods only
shipper may be the same. as an ancillary activity. (A.F. Sanchez Brokerage
Inc. v. CA, 488 Phil. 430)
Governing Laws: ● The Civil Code does not distinguish:
(a) New Civil Code o Between a person or enterprise
(b) Code of Commerce offering transportation services on
(c) Special Laws a regular or scheduled basis and
one offering such service on an
1. Carriage of Goods By Sea Act
unscheduled basis. (De Guzman
2. Montreal Convention v. CA, 250 Phil. 613)
● Between a carrier offering its services to the
In all matters not regulated by the Civil Code, the general population and one who offers its
rights and obligations of common carriers shall be services only to a narrow segment of the general
governed by the Code of Commerce and by special population (Id.)
laws. (Civil Code, Art. 1766) ● The Civil Code makes no distinction as to the
means of transportation as long as it is done
Elements of a Common Carrier: through land, water, or air. (First Philippine
(a) Persons, corporations, firms, or Industrial Corporation v. CA, 360 Phil. 852)
associations; ● A carrier will be considered a common carrier
(b) Engaged in the business of carrying or regardless of whether it owns the vehicle it used
transporting passengers or goods or both; or has to actually hire one as long as the entity
(c) By land, water, or air; holds itself out to the public for the transport of
(d) For compensation; and goods as a business. (Torres-Madrid Brokerage,
(e) Offering their services to the public. Inc. v. FEB Mitsui Marine Insurance Co., 789
(Civil Code, Art. 1732) Phil. 413)
however, where the forwarder contracts to technology application or digital platform technology
deliver goods to their destination instead of transporting passengers from one point to another,
merely arranging for their transportation, it for compensation. The TNVS cannot operate as a
becomes liable as a common carrier for loss or common carrier outside of or independent from the
damage to goods. (Unsworth Transport v. CA, use of the internet-based technology of the TNC or
G.R. No. 166250, 2010) TNCs to which they are accredited [DOTr D.O. No.
2018-012].
Person, Partnership, Firm or Corporation NOT
as a Common Carrier The LTFRB shall grant the TNCs and their
● A travel agency is NOT a common carrier. Its accredited TNVS a Certificate of Public
covenant with its customers is simply to make Convenience (CPC) upon full compliance of
travel arrangements in their behalf. The jurisdictional requirements, as may be determined
relationship between the travel agency and the by LTFRB. The LTFRB shall also set the fare for the
passenger is, at most, one of agency TNVS after public hearing or in consultation with the
(Crisostomo v. CA, G.R. No. 138334, 2003) TNCs and TNVS [DOTr D.O. No. 2018- 012].
● An exclusive contractor and hauler, rendering or
offering its services to an individual or entity. Despite the limited market scope of its app, Angkas’
(FGU Insurance v. G.P. Sarmiento Trucking, bikers offer transportation services to willing public
G.R. No. 141910, 2002) consumers and these services may be readily
accessed by anyone who chooses to download the
Transport Network Vehicle Services and Angkas app. While they may refuse to offer their
Transport Network Companies service by simply not going online or not logging in,
when they do log in, they make their services
TNVs and TNCs are expressly considered common publicly available. As such, DBDOYC (Angkas) is a
carriers. They are subject to full regulation and transportation provider and its accredited drivers are
supervision by the LTFRB, including but not limited common carriers [LTFRB v. Valenzuela and
to: DBDOYC, Inc. G.R. No. 242860 (2019)].
a. Application and approval/ denial of
franchise,
b. Setting of fares, routes, operating 1. Diligence required of Common
conditions, and carriers
c. Imposition of fines, suspension, and
cancellation of franchise. Extraordinary Diligence or Responsibility of
Common Carriers Regarding Passengers and
In 2017, MyTaxi.PH, Inc. (GRAB) filed a case before Goods
the LTFRB which did not reach the Supreme Court, Common carriers are required to exercise
LTFRB held that under D.O. 2015-011 then in force, extraordinary diligence both over the goods and
a TNC is not granted unilateral authority to set fares over the safety of the passengers they are
as the same would be constitutive of an undue transporting, according to all the circumstances of
delegation of legislative authority. Subsequently, each case. (Civil Code, Art. 1733)
D.O. 2017-011 and D.O. 2018-013 were issued,
removing the “confusing language” of D.O. 2015- The Common Carrier Is Not an Insurer of
011 and explicitly stating that rate-fixing authority Absolute Safety
shall be limited to the LTFRB in accordance with the It has been held that airline passengers must take
law [Case No. CO-EB-2018-04-0039, Accreditation such risks incident to the mode of travel. In this
No. 2015-TNC-001]. regard, adverse weather conditions or extreme
climatic changes are some of the perils involved in
Transport Network Company or TNC is defined as air travel, the consequences of which the passenger
an organization whether a corporation, partnership, must assume or expect. After all, common carriers
or sole proprietor, that provides pre-arranged are not the insurer of all risks.
transportation services for compensation using an (Japan Airlines v. CA, G.R. No. 118664, 1998)
internet-based technology application or a digital
platform technology to connect passengers with In Transportation of Goods vs Passengers
drivers using their personal vehicles [DOTC D.O. GOODS PASSENGERS
No. 2015-011]. To transport with To carry passengers safely
the greatest skill as far as human care and
Transport Network Vehicle Service or TNVS refers and utmost foresight can provide,
to a TNC-accredited private vehicle owner, which is foresight
a common carrier, using the internet- based
vehicle at the place of destination and has a All persons who remain on the premises a
reasonable opportunity to leave the common reasonable time after leaving the conveyance are
carrier’s premises. deemed passengers. What constitutes a
● The duty to exercise extraordinary diligence “reasonable time” is to be determined from all the
commences when the passenger places himself circumstances, which includes a reasonable time to
in the care and control of the common carrier see after his/her baggage and prepare for his/her
who accepts him/her as a passenger. departure. (Id.)
● For passengers of ships, the Supreme Court has
ruled that a reasonable time to leave and pick up For passengers of ships, the SC has ruled that a
baggage is an hour after arrival (Aboitiz Shipping reasonable time to leave and pick up baggage is an
v. CA, G.R. No. 84458, 1989). hour after arrival (Id.)
Do not confuse the perfection of the contract of In a case involving a bus passenger, SC reiterated
carriage with the commencement of the duty to as a rule that the relation of carrier and passenger
exercise extraordinary diligence. For example, the does not cease at the moment the passenger alights
contract of carriage may be perfected in January from the carrier's vehicle at a place selected by the
while the duty to exercise extraordinary diligence carrier at the point of destination, but continues until
may only start or commence in March. the passenger has had a reasonable time or a
reasonable opportunity to leave the carrier's
Example: It is possible for a law student to enter into premises. Reasonable time or a reasonable delay is
a perfected contract with the carrier (such as buying to be determined from all the circumstances. (La
a ticket online) in June before the Bar Exam for a trip Mallorca v. CA, G.R. No. L-20761, 1966)
or voyage scheduled in December after the Bar
Exam. The duty to exercise extraordinary diligence B. VIGILANCE OVER GOODS
over the safety of the law student will obviously not
start or begin in June but only when the law student Presumption of Negligence
actually boards the ship or airplane in December General Rule: The common carrier is presumed to
(this is the strict view which is more logical and less have been at fault or to have acted negligently when
absurd than the liberal view) the goods transported are lost, destroyed or
deteriorated, or when a passenger dies or is injured.
c. Waiting for carrier or boarding This is not a conclusive but disputable presumption,
of carrier and it may be overcome by contrary evidence of
defenses.
A public vehicle, once it stops, is in effect making a
continuous offer to prospective passengers. Hence, 1. Exempting causes
it becomes the duty of the drivers and conductors to
do no act which would have the effect of increasing Exceptions (Civil Code, Art. 1734): When the
the peril to a passenger while he/she was attempting same is due to any of the following causes only:
to board the vehicle. (Dangwa Transportation Co., (a) Flood, earthquake, storm, lightning or other
Inc. v. CA, 278 Phil. 629)
natural disaster or calamity
(b) Act of the public Enemy in war, whether
It is the duty of common carriers to stop their
conveyances at a reasonable length of time to afford international or civil.
the passengers an opportunity to board and enter. (c) Act or omission of the shipper or owner of
Carriers become liable for injuries suffered by the goods
boarding passengers resulting from the starting up (d) The character of the goods or defects in the
or jerking of the vehicle while boarding. (Id.) packing or in the containers
(e) Order or act of competent authority
d. Arrival at destination
a. Flood, earthquake, storm,
The duty to exercise extraordinary diligence lightning or other natural
terminates when the passenger alights from the disaster or calamity
vehicle at the place of destination and has a
reasonable opportunity to leave the common
Conditions to avail of defense:
carrier’s premises. (Aboitiz Shipping Corporation v.
CA, 258-A Phil. 665) (a) The natural disaster was the proximate &
only cause
Actual delivery: When possession has been turned the shipper/owner agreed to such
over to the consignee or his duly authorized agent stipulation (Civil Code, Art. 1746)
and a reasonable time is given to him to remove the (e) Cannot be availed of if the common carrier,
goods ( Westwind Shipping Corporation v. UCPB without just cause, delays the transportation
General Insurance Co., Inc., 722 Phil. 38) of the goods or changes the stipulated or
usual route in cases of loss, destruction, or
Constructive delivery: Delivery of the bill of lading
to the consignee or any person who has a right to deterioration of the goods. (Civil Code, Art.
receive the goods under the bill of lading can be 1747)
considered a constructive delivery. After all, the (f) For delay on account of strikes or riots is
issuance of a bill of lading is prima facie evidence of valid. (Civil Code, Art. 1748)
the receipt of the goods by the carrier ( Saludo v. (g) To the value of the goods appearing in the
CA, G.R. No. 95536) bill of lading is valid, unless the
shipper/owner declares a greater value.
b. Temporary Unloading or (Civil Code, Art. 1749)
Storage
Determination if the stipulation is within public
A public vehicle, once it stops, is in effect making a policy
continuous offer to prospective passengers. Hence, The fact that the common carrier has no competitor
it becomes the duty of the drivers and conductors to along the line or route, or a part thereof, to which the
do no act which would have the effect of increasing contract refers shall be taken into consideration on
the peril to a passenger while he/she was attempting the question of whether a stipulation limiting the
to board the vehicle. (Dangwa Transportation Co., common carrier's liability is reasonable, just, and in
Inc. v. CA, 278 Phil. 629) consonance with public policy. (Civil Code, Art.
1751)
It is the duty of common carriers to stop their
conveyances at a reasonable length of time to afford Note: Presumption of negligence against the carrier
the passengers an opportunity to board and enter. in cases of loss, destruction, or deterioration of the
Carriers become liable for injuries suffered by goods is still present despite stipulations limiting
boarding passengers resulting from the starting up liability. (Civil Code, Art. 1752.)
or jerking of the vehicle while boarding. (Id.)
Factors to be considered when refusing
stipulations limiting liability
4. Stipulations for Limitation of (a) Refusal to carry goods, UNLESS
Liability stipulation limiting liability is signed by the
shipper (Civil Code, Art. 1746)
Stipulations for Limitations of Liability (b) Delay or deviation, without just cause (Civil
1. Degree less than extraordinary diligence Code, Art. 1747)
2. Limitation of liability to a fixed amount (c) Lack or presence of competition (Civil
Code, Art. 1751)
(a) Degree less than extraordinary Diligence
The Common carrier and the shipper/owner can
stipulate in limiting the carrier’s liability for the loss, Limitations Under Montreal Convention
destruction, or deterioration of the goods to be Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for
transported to a degree less than extraordinary International Carriage by Air - Montreal, 28 May
diligence. This stipulation is valid if it is: 1999
1. In writing, signed by the shipper or owner;
2. Supported by a valuable consideration other Application
than the service rendered by the carrier; and It applies to all international carriage of persons,
3. Reasonable, just, and not contrary to public baggage, or cargo performed by aircraft for reward.
policy (Civil Code, Art. 1744) It applies equally to gratuitous carriage by aircraft
performed by an air transport undertaking. (Article 1
Other Stipulations Limiting Liability of Common par. 1)
Carrier
A stipulation limiting the common carrier’s liability:
(a) May be annulled by the shipper/owner if the International Carriage (Article 1 par. 2)
carrier refused to carry the goods, unless COVERED NOT COVERED
Exception: Not liable if and to the extent it proves Advance Payments (Article 28)
that the destruction, or loss of, or damage to, the In the case of aircraft accidents resulting in the
cargo resulted from one or more of the following: death or injury of passengers, the carrier shall, if
(a) inherent defect, quality, or vice of that required by its national law, make advance
cargo; payments without delay to a natural person or
(b) defective packing of that cargo performed persons who are entitled to claim compensation to
by a person other than the carrier or its meet the immediate economic needs of such
servants or agents; persons.
(c) an act of war or an armed conflict;
Such advance payments shall not constitute a
(d) an act of public authority carried out in recognition of liability and may be offset against any
connection with the entry, exit, or transit of amounts subsequently paid as damages by the
the cargo. carrier.
being transgressed (Nocum v. Laguna Tayabas, (c) Acts of Thief or robbers, done with the use
G.R. No. L-23733, October 31, 1969). of arms or through irresistible force (Civil
Code, Art. 2001)
Exception: While there is no law that authorizes
bus operators to open the luggage of their The relationship between the consignee and the
passengers, RA 6235 (Acts Inimical to Civil arrastre operator is bailor-bailee or depositor-
Aviation) gives airline companies authority to open depositary. An arrastre operator does not render
and investigate packages and cargoes loaded on any service of a maritime nature. (Unknown Owner
board. Should the personnel of the airline fail to of MV China vs. Asian Terminals, G.R. No 195661,
discover explosives, it could only be due to their 2015)
failure to exercise the utmost diligence of very
cautious persons. Thus, an arrastre operator should adhere to the
same degree of diligence as that legally expected of
Declaration of Passenger of Contents of a a warehouseman or a common carrier as set forth
Package which Injured Other Passengers in Warehouse Receipts Act and Article 1733 of the
The carrier is not liable. It exercised extraordinary Civil Code. As custodian of the shipment discharged
diligence. It is to be presumed that a passenger will from the vessel, the arrastre operator must take
not take with him anything dangerous to the life and good care of the same and turn it over to the party
limbs of his co-passengers, not to speak of his own. entitled to its possession. (Marina Port Service, Inc.
Not to be considered lightly is the right to privacy to v. American Home Assurance Corporation, G.R.
which each passenger is entitled. (Nocum v. Laguna 201822, 2015)
Tayabas Bus Co., G.R. No. L-23733, 1969)
Delivery without surrender of bill of lading (b) From the day on which it should be delivered
The surrender of the bill of the original bill of lading according to the conditions of its transportation.
is not a condition precedent for a common carrier to (Code of Commerce, Art. 952)
be discharged of its contractual obligation.
Note: The above period applies to cases under the
If the surrender is not possible, acknowledgment of
Carriage of Goods by Sea Act
delivery by signing the delivery receipt suffices.
(Republic of the Philippines v. Lorenzo Shipping
Corporation, 491 Phil. 151) Claim v. Suit
CLAIM File a CLAIM against the carrier:
Refusal of the consignee to take delivery Upon receipt of the goods; or
Instances when consignee can refuse to accept the Within 24 hours following the
goods receipt of the merchandise
(a) Only a PART of the goods are delivered and it SUIT The CLAIM is a condition precedent
to the filing of a SUIT.
cannot make use of the goods without the others
(Code of Commerce, Art. 363)
The consignee shall file a SUIT
(b) If the goods are DAMAGED and thus rendered within 1 year from either:
useless for the purposes of sale or consumption. Delivery of the goods; or
In this instance, the consignee may leave the Denial of the claim
goods to the carrier and demand payment for the
goods at their current market price (Code of Effects of Stipulations
Commerce, Art. 365) a. Change of Route
(c) When there is a DELAY on account of the fault General Rule: Common carriers cannot change the
of the carrier. This is considered to be an agreed route to which the transportation is to be
abandonment. In this case, the carrier shall made. (Code of Commerce, Art. 359)
satisfy the total value of the goods as if the goods
Exception: When the carrier is obliged to change
were lost or misplaced. (Code of Commerce, Art. its route due to force majeure. If the transportation
371) costs increase in such an instance, the carrier shall
be reimbursed for the increase. (Id.)
Period for Filing Claims
The period of filing of claims will depend on whether Note: If the carrier changes its route without just
the damage or average can be determined from the cause, the carrier shall be liable to pay damages
exterior of the packaging: suffered by the goods for any cause. If no route was
agreed upon, the carrier must select the shortest,
CAN BE Claims should be filed upon least expensive, and practically passable route. (Id.)
ASCERTAINED the receipt of the package;
CANNOT BE Claims should be filed within b. Change in the Consignment of Goods
ASCERTAINED twenty-four (24) hours The shipper may change the consignment of the
following the receipt of the goods delivered to the common carrier as long as
goods. the place of delivery is not changed. The change is
No claims shall be admitted against the Common considered a novation. The carrier shall comply with
carrier with regard to the condition of the goods after this change, provided that the bill of lading be
the lapse of these periods. (Code of Commerce, Art. returned to the carrier at the time of making the
366) change of the consignee. (Code of Commerce, Art.
360)
Claims are conditions precedent to the accrual of a
right of action to recover damages. (Southern Lines, All expenses arising from the change of
Inc. v. CA, 114 Phil. 198) consignment shall be shouldered by the shipper.
(Code of Commerce, Art. 360)
Period for Filing Actions
Actions relating to the delivery of cargo or the Charter Party
indemnity for delays and damages suffered by the It is a contract by virtue of which the owner or the
goods transported prescribed after one (1) year. agent of a vessel binds himself to transport
merchandise or persons at a fixed price. (San
The prescriptive period will be counted from: Miguel Corporation v. Heirs of Inguito, 433 Phil. 428)
(a) The day of delivery of the cargo at the place of
its destination; or
A charter party may either be: II. Persons in Maritime Law (Shipowner, Ship
(a) Bareboat or demise charters; or agent, Captain, Sailing Mate, Supercargo)
(b) Contracts of affreightment, which includes
i. time charters and Persons Participating in Maritime Commerce
ii. voyage charters (San Miguel (a) Ship owner and/or ship agent – the shipping
Corporation v. Heirs of Inguito, 433 agent is the person entrusted with the
Phil. 428) provisioning of a vessel or who represents her in
the port in which she may be found
General Categories or Kinds of Charter Party
(b) Captain or Master — the person in charge of the
DEMISE / CONTRACT OF
BAREBOAT AFFREIGHTMENT vessel and navigates it. The captain also acts as
The charterer mans The owner of a vessel the general agent of the ship owner.
the vessel with its own leases the whole or (c) Other officers of the vessel (i.e. sailing mate,
people and is part of its space to haul second mate, third mate, marine engineer)
considered the owner goods for another. (d) Supercargo — the person specially employed by
pro hac vice (for this the owner of cargo to take charge of and sell to
occasion only). the best advantage merchandise which has
The owner retains been shipped, and to purchase returning
Owner completely and possession, command, cargoes and to receive freight
exclusively and navigation of the
relinquishing ship.
possession, Basic Functions of a Captain
command, and A master or captain, for purposes of maritime
navigation to the commerce, is the one who has command of a
charterer. vessel. A captain commonly performs three (3)
distinct roles:
The charterer is liable The shipowner is liable
(a) he is a general agent of the shipowner;
for damages for damages
Carrier is converted to The carrier remains a (b) he is also the commander and technical director
the private carrier – common carrier – of the vessel; and
ordinary diligence extraordinary diligence (c) he is a representative of the country under
whose flag he navigates
a. Bareboat/demise charter (Inter-Orient Maritime Enterprises, Inc. vs NLRC,
Under a Bareboat/Demise Charter, the charterer G.R. No. 115286, 1994).
mans the vessel with his own people and becomes,
in effect, the owner of the ship for the voyage or Liability for acts of captain
service stipulated, subject to the liability for The ship owner and ship agent shall be civilly liable
damages caused by negligence. (San Miguel for the:
Corporation v. Heirs of Inguito, 433 Phil. 428) (a) Acts of the captain; and
(b) The obligations contracted by the captain to
Conversion of a Common Carrier into a Private repair, equip, and provision the vessel, provided
Carrier the creditor proves that the amount claimed
A charter party may transform a common carrier into
was invested therein. (Code of Commerce, Art.
a private carrier. However, it must be a bareboat or
demise charter where the charterer mans the vessel 586)
with his own people and becomes, in effect, the
owner for the voyage or service stipulated (Caltex v. When Ship Owner/Ship Agent is not liable
Sulpicio Lines, G.R. No. 131166, 1999) The ship owner and ship agent shall NOT be liable
for obligations contracted by the captain which
b. Time charter exceed the powers and privileges granted to the
The leased vessel is leased to the charterer for a latter. However, the owner and agent will be again
fixed period of time. (San Miguel Corporation v. liable if the amounts claimed were used for the
Heirs of Inguito, 433 Phil. 428) benefit of the vessel. (Code of Commerce, Art. 588)
Exception: in cases of co-ownership of a vessel, a This shall be borne by all persons having an interest
co-owner may exempt himself from liability by in the vessel and cargo at the time of the occurrence
abandonment of the part of the vessel belonging to of the average. (Code of Commerce, Art. 812)
him.
To incur the expenses and cause of damages as
Abandonment may be done to avoid liability in general/gross average, there must be:
the following cases: (a) A resolution of the captain, adopted after
(a) For civil liability to third persons arising from the deliberation with the sailing mate and other
conduct of the captain in the vigilance over the officers of the vessel; and
goods which the vessel carried; (b) A hearing with the persons interested in
(b) For the proportionate contribution of co-owners the cargo who may be present. (Code of
of the vessel to a common fund for the results of Commerce, Art. 813)
the acts of the captain referred to in Art. 587 of
the Code of Commerce; and Four Requisites of General Average
(c) For the civil liability incurred by the ship owner in Tolentino, in his commentaries on the Code of
case of collision. Commerce, gives the following requisites for the
general average:
Exemption of Agent (a) First, there must be a common danger. This
The shipping agent shall also be civilly liable for the means, that both the ship and the cargo, after
indemnities in favor of third persons which arose has been loaded, are subject to the same
from the conduct of the captain in the care of the danger, whether during the voyage, or in the port
goods. However, the agent may exempt himself of loading or unloading; that the danger arises
from this liability by abandoning the vessel with all from the accidents of the sea, dispositions of the
her equipment and the freight he may have earned
authority, or faults of men, provided that the
during the voyage. (Code of Commerce, Art. 587)
circumstances producing the peril should be
IV. Maritime Accidents – General Average, ascertained and imminent or may rationally be
Arrivals under Stress, Collisions, Shipwreck and said to be certain and imminent. This last
Salvage requirement excludes measures undertaken
Averages against a distant peril.
1. All extraordinary or accidental expenses which (b) Second, that for the common safety part of the
may be incurred during the navigation for the vessel or of the cargo or both are sacrificed
preservation of the vessel or cargo, or both; or deliberately.
2. All damage or deterioration the vessel may suffer (c) Third, that from the expenses or damages
from the time she puts to sea from the port of caused follow the successful saving of the vessel
departure until she casts anchor in the port of and cargo.
destination, and those suffered by the (d) Fourth, that the expenses or damages should
merchandise from the time it is loaded in the port have been incurred or inflicted after taking
of shipment until it is unloaded in the port of
proper legal steps and authority.
consignment. (Code of Commerce, Art. 806)
Maritime protest is required In the following However, it may also apply to domestic trade
Cases: provided there is a Paramount Clause in the
(a) Collision; contract.
(b) Arrival under stress
(c) Shipwreck; and Paramount clause
(d) In case the vessel has gone through a A stipulation or clause either on the bill of lading or
hurricane or when the captain believes that the charter party stipulating the laws that the parties
agreed to be used of that particular transport.
cargo has suffered damages.
Responsibility of the carrier under the COGSA
Maritime Protest shall also be done if the vessel has The responsibility of the carrier begins when the
been wrecked, and the captain is saved alone or goods are brought to the carrier and cross one side
with part of the crew, in which case, the captain shall of the vessel (portside). It ceases only when the
appear before the nearest authority and make a goods cross the other side (starboard side). This is
sworn statement of the facts. also known as the “tackle to tackle” rule.
Salvage - it is the compensation allowed to persons Requisites of contracts covered by COGSA
by whose voluntary assistance a ship at sea or her (a) Contracts for the carriage of goods
cargo or both have been saved in whole or in part
(b) By sea
from impending peril, or such property recovered
from actual peril or loss. (c) To and from Philippine ports
(d) In foreign trade
In case of shipwreck, derelict or recapture; a service
which one person renders to the owner of a ship or Shipper’s guaranty upon delivery of the goods
goods by his own labor, preserving the goods or to carrier for shipment
ship which the owner or those entrusted with the The shipper guarantees at the time of shipment the
care of them either abandoned in distress at sea or accuracy of the marks, number, quantity, and weight
are unable to protect and secure. of the goods. The shipper shall indemnify the carrier
against all losses, damages, and expenses arising
Derelict from errors or inaccuracies.
It is a ship or cargo which is abandoned and
deserted at sea by those who are in charge of it, The carrier shall be bound before and at the
without any hope of recovering it, or without any beginning of the voyage, to exercise due diligence
intention of returning to it. to:
(a) Make the ship seaworthy
Note: Different liabilities may arise depending on (b) Properly man, equip, and supply the ship
the type of vessel or contract (c) Make the holds, refrigerating and cooling
(a) Common carrier – governed by the Civil chambers, and all other parts of the ship in
Code (as discussed above) which goods are carried, fit, and safe for
(b) Charter party – governed by Code of reception, carriage, and, preservation.
Commerce (Maritime Commerce)
(c) Contracts of carriage by sea to and from Notice of loss or damage
the Philippines in foreign trade – Carriage When there is a loss or damage to the goods, there
of Goods by Sea Act must be a written notice that provides:
(a) The general nature of such loss or damage
V. COGSA (Carriage of Goods by Sea Act) (b) Given to the carrier or his agent
Application (c) At the port of discharge or at the time of
The law of the country to which the goods are to be the removal of the goods.
transported shall govern the liability of the common
carrier for their loss, destruction or deterioration. If the loss or damage is not apparent, the notice
(Article 1753, Civil Code) must be given within 3 days from delivery. The
notice of loss or damage may be endorsed upon the
The COGSA is the applicable law for all contracts of receipt of the goods given by the person taking
carriage by sea to and from the Philippines in foreign delivery thereof.
trade. (COGSA, Sec. 1 & Cua v. Wallem Philippines
Shipping, Inc., 690 Phil. 491) The notice or writing need not be given if the state
of the goods at the time of their receipt has been the
subject of Joint Survey Inspection. (COGSA, Sec. lading; the declaration is prima facie evidence
3(6)) and not conclusive on the carrier.
● Shipper and carrier may agree on another
Under COGSA, the filing of a notice of claim is NOT maximum amount, but not more than the amount
a condition precedent to filing a suit (UCPB v. of damage actually sustained. The fixed
Aboitiz Shipping G.R. No. 168433, 2009) maximum amount must also not be less than
$500 per package per customary freight unit.
“Loss” contemplates merely a situation where no (COGSA, Sec. 6 [5])
delivery at all was made by the shipper of the goods
because the same had perished, gone out of D. THE MONTREAL CONVENTION OF
commerce or disappeared in much a way that their 1999
existence is unknown or they cannot be recovered.
It does not include a situation where:
1. Applicability
● There was indeed delivery — but delivery to the
wrong person, or a misdelivery (Ang. V.
Application
American Steamship, G.R. No. L-22491, 1967)
It applies to all international carriage of persons,
● Damage arising from delay or late delivery
baggage, or cargo performed by aircraft for reward.
(Mitsui O.S.K. Lines v. CA, G.R. No. 119571,
It applies equally to gratuitous carriage by aircraft
1998).
performed by an air transport undertaking. (Article 1
In such instances, the Civil Code rules on
par. 1)
prescription shall apply.
International Carriage (Article 1 par 2)
Period of prescription COVERED NOT COVERED
Actions must be brought within one (1) year after:
Any carriage in which, Carriage between
(a) Delivery of the goods; or
according to the agreement two points within
(b) The date when the goods should have been between the parties, the the territory of a
delivered. (COGSA, Sec. 3[6]) place of departure and the single State Party
place of destination, without an agreed
Failure to file within the prescriptive period will whether or not there be a stopping place
discharge the common carrier and the vessel from break in the carriage or a within the territory
liability. (COGSA, Sec. 3[6]) transshipment, are situated of another State
either within the territories (Article 1 par 2)
However, the shipper shall not lose the right to of two States Parties, or
initiate an action against the carrier or the vessel if within the territory of a
no notice of loss or damage is given. (COGSA, Sec. single State Party if there is
3[6]) an agreed stopping place
within the territory of
When The One-Year Period In COGSA Is another State, even if that
Interrupted: State is not a State Party.
(a) When an action is filed in court; (Universal
Shipping Lines v. IAC, G.R. No. 74125,
1990); and Successive Carriage
(b) When there is a contrary agreement Carriage to be performed by several successive
between the parties. (Stevens v. carriers is deemed, for the purposes of this
Norddeuscher, G.R. No. L-17730, 1962) Convention, to be one undivided carriage if it has
been regarded by the parties as a single operation,
whether it had been agreed upon under the form of
Limitation of liability a single contract or of a series of contracts, and it
● Carriers and vessels shall be liable for any loss does not lose its international character merely
or damage in connection with the transportation because one contract or a series of contracts is to
of goods. However, such liability is limited to: be performed entirely within the territory of the same
● Maximum of $500 per package or, if not shipped State. (Article 1, par 3)
in packages, per customary freight unit (e.g.
metric ton). Actions of Passenger Against Carrier in
● Carriers and vessels will be subject to greater Transportation of: (Article 36)
liability if the nature and value of goods are GOODS PASSENGER
declared by the shipper and inserted in the bill of a) Passenger General Rule:
or consignor
will have a The passenger or any (b) Damages exceeding 100 000 Special
right of action person entitled to Drawing Rights – the carrier is liable
against the compensation in unless the carrier proves that:
first carrier respect of him or her 1. such damage was not due to the
b) The can take action only negligence or other wrongful act or
passenger or against the carrier omission of the carrier or its servants or
consignee which performed the agents; or
who is entitled carriage during which 2. such damage was solely due to the
to delivery will the accident or the negligence or other wrongful act or
have a right of delay occurred omission of a third party.
action against Exception:
the last carrier By express
h. Lost or Delayed Baggage
c) Further, each agreement, the first
may take carrier has assumed
Damage to Baggage (Article 17)
action against liability for the whole
the carrier journey. Baggage
which Baggage means both checked baggage and
performed the unchecked baggage. (Article 17, par. 4)
carriage
during which Liabilities of the carrier:
the (a) Liable for damage sustained in case of
destruction, death or bodily injury of a passenger upon
loss, damage, condition only that the accident which
or delay took caused the death or injury took place on
place.
board the aircraft or in the course of any of
These carriers will be
jointly and severally the operations of embarking or
liable to the passenger disembarking.
to the consignor or (b) Liable for damage sustained in case of
consignee. destruction or loss of, or of damage to,
checked baggage upon condition only that
Combined Carriage the event which caused the destruction,
In the case of combined carriage performed partly loss, or damage took place on board the
by air and partly by any other mode of carriage, the aircraft or during any period within which the
provisions of this Convention shall, subject to checked baggage was in the charge of the
paragraph 4 of Article 18, apply only to the carriage
carrier. However, the carrier is not liable if
by air, provided that the carriage by air falls within
and to the extent that the damage resulted
the terms of Article 1. (Article 38)
from the inherent defect, quality, or vice of
Prima facie evidence the baggage.
The air waybill or the cargo receipt is prima facie (c) In the case of unchecked baggage,
evidence of the conclusion of the contract, of the including personal items, the carrier is liable
acceptance of the cargo, and of the conditions of if the damage resulted from its fault or that
carriage mentioned therein. (Article 11, par. 1) of its servants or agents
(d) If the carrier admits the loss of the checked
2. Extent of Liability of Air Carrier baggage, or if the checked baggage has not
arrived at the expiration of twenty-one days
g. Death or Injury of Passenger after the date on which it ought to have
arrived, the passenger is entitled to enforce
Limitations and Extent of Compensation
against the carrier the rights which flow from
Compensation in Case of Death or Injury of
the contract of carriage.
Passengers (Article 21)
(a) Damages not exceeding 100 000 Special
Damage to Cargo (Article 18)
Drawing Rights - the carrier shall not be
General Rule: The carrier is liable for damage
able to exclude or limit its liability.
sustained in the event of the destruction or loss of,
or damage to, cargo upon condition only that the
event which caused the damage so sustained took b. When by reason of death or injury of a
place during the carriage by air. passenger compensation is claimed by
a person other than the passenger.
Exception: Not liable if and to the extent it proves
that the destruction, or loss of, or damage to, the Advance Payments (Article 28)
cargo resulted from one or more of the following: In the case of aircraft accidents resulting in the
(e) inherent defect, quality, or vice of that death or injury of passengers, the carrier shall, if
cargo; required by its national law, make advance
(f) defective packing of that cargo performed payments without delay to a natural person or
by a person other than the carrier or its persons who are entitled to claim compensation to
servants or agents; meet the immediate economic needs of such
persons.
(g) an act of war or an armed conflict;
(h) an act of public authority carried out in Such advance payments shall not constitute a
connection with the entry, exit, or transit of recognition of liability and may be offset against any
the cargo. amounts subsequently paid as damages by the
carrier.
Carriage by air
The period during which the cargo is in charge of the Limitations and Extent of Compensation
carrier.
Compensation in Case of Death or Injury of
Note: The period of the carriage by air does not Passengers (Article 21)
extend to any carriage by land, by sea, or by inland (a) Damages not exceeding 100 000 Special
waterway performed outside an airport. If, however, Drawing Rights - the carrier shall not be
such carriage takes place in the performance of a
able to exclude or limit its liability.
contract for carriage by air, for the purpose of
loading, delivery, or transshipment, any damage is (b) Damages exceeding 100 000 Special
presumed, subject to proof to the contrary, to have Drawing Rights – the carrier is liable
been the result of an event which took place during unless the carrier proves that:
the carriage by air. If a carrier, without the consent 1. such damage was not due to the
of the consignor, substitutes carriage by another negligence or other wrongful act or
mode of transport for the whole or part of a carriage omission of the carrier or its servants or
intended by the agreement between the parties to agents; or
be carriage by air, such carriage by another mode 2. such damage was solely due to the
of transport is deemed to be within the period of negligence or other wrongful act or
carriage by air. omission of a third party.
the passenger’s actual interest in delivery at other expenses of the litigation, does not exceed the
destination. sum which the carrier has offered in writing to the
plaintiff within a period of six months from the date
(c) In the carriage of cargo, the liability of of the occurrence causing the damage, or before the
the carrier in the case of destruction, commencement of the action, if that is later.
loss, damage, or delay
Valid Stipulation (Article 25)
General Rule: Limited to a sum of 17 Special A carrier may stipulate that the contract of carriage
Drawing Rights per kilogram, shall be subject to higher limits of liability than those
provided for in this Convention or to no limits of
Exception: The consignor has made, at the time liability whatsoever.
when the package was handed over to the carrier, a
special declaration of interest in delivery at the Void Stipulation (Article 26)
destination and has paid a supplementary sum if the Any provision tending to relieve the carrier of liability
case so requires. or to fix a lower limit than that which is laid down in
this Convention shall be null and void
In that case, the carrier will be liable to pay a sum
not exceeding the declared sum, unless it proves Note: It does not result in the nullity of the whole
that the sum is greater than the consignor’s actual contract
interest in delivery at destination.
Aggregation of Claims (Article 30)
Weight of Package in case of destruction, loss, Available conditions and limits of liability
damage, or delay of a part of the cargo, or an If an action is brought against a servant or agent of
object contained therein the carrier arising out of damage to which the
The weight to be taken into consideration in Convention relates, such servant or agent, if they
determining the amount to which the carrier’s liability prove that they acted within the scope of their
is limited shall be only the total weight of the employment, shall be entitled to avail themselves of
package or packages concerned. If the destruction, the conditions and limits of liability which the carrier
etc. affects the value of other packages covered by itself is entitled to invoke under this Convention.
the same air waybill, or the same receipt or, if they
were not issued, by the same record preserved by Aggregate Amount
the other means referred to in paragraph 2 of Article The aggregate of the amounts recoverable from the
4, the total weight of such package or packages carrier, its servants, and agents, in that case, shall
shall also be taken into consideration in determining not exceed the said limits.
the limit of liability.
Note: Save in respect of the carriage of cargo,
Exemption from liability availability of limits and limits on aggregate amount
No liability for damage caused by delay or damage shall not apply if it is proved that the damage
in the carriage of baggage (1st and 2nd type of resulted from an act or omission of the servant or
liability) if it is proven: agent done with intent to cause damage or
recklessly and with the knowledge that damage
Damage resulted from an act or omission of the would probably result.
carrier, its servants or agents, done with intent to
cause damage or recklessly and with knowledge Prescription
that damage would probably result; provided that, in Timely Notice of Complaints (Article 31)
the case of such act or omission of a servant or Every complaint must be made in writing and given
agent, it is also proved that such servant or agent or dispatched within the times aforesaid.
was acting within the scope of its employment.
RECEIPT Prima facie evidence that the
Additional compensation (Article 22, par 6) WITHOUT same has been delivered in
The limits prescribed in Articles 21 and 22 shall not COMPLAINT good condition and in
prevent the court from awarding, in accordance with accordance with the document
its own law, in addition, the whole or part of the court of carriage or with the record
costs and of the other expenses of the litigation preserved
incurred by the plaintiff, including interest.
DAMAGE Complain to the carrier forthwith
The foregoing provision shall not apply if the amount after the discovery of the
of the damages awarded, excluding court costs and damage
Effect of Non-compliance
Exception: Fraud
Right to Damages
It shall be extinguished if an action is not brought
within a period of two years, reckoned from:
(a) the date of arrival at the destination, or
(b) from the date on which the aircraft ought to
have arrived, or
(c) from the date on which the carriage
stopped.
3. Methods for treatment of the human or animal If an employee made the invention in the course of
body by surgery or therapy and diagnostic his regular employment, the patent shall belong to:
methods practiced on the human or animal 1. The employee, the inventive activity is not
body; part of his regular duties (even if the
employee uses the time, facilities, and
Note: This prohibition, however, does not apply materials of the employer);
to products and compositions for use in any of 2. The employer, if the invention is the result
these methods. of the performance of the employee’s
regular duties UNLESS there is an
4. Plant varieties or animal breeds or essentially agreement to the contrary.
biological process for the production of plants or
animals; i. Right of Priority
An application for patent filed by any person who
Note: This provision shall not apply to micro- has previously applied for the same invention in
organisms and non-biological and another country which by treaty, convention, or law
microbiological processes. Further, Congress affords similar privileges to Filipino citizens, shall be
may enact a law providing sui generis protection considered as filed as of the date of filing the foreign
of plant varieties and animal breeds and a application, provided that:
system of community intellectual rights 1. The local application expressly claims
protection. priority;
2. It is filed within twelve (12) months from the
Note: Congress has already enacted the Plan date the earliest foreign application was
Variety Protection Act which grants a Certificate filed; and
of Plant Variety Protection for varieties that are: 3. A certified copy of the foreign application
(a) new, (b) distinct, (c) uniform, and (d) together with an English translation is filed
stable. (Sec. 4, Plant Variety Protection Act) within six (6) months from the date of filing
in the Philippines.
5. Aesthetic creations; and
4. Grounds For Cancellation Of A
6. Anything which is contrary to public order or
morality. (Sec. 22, IP Code) Patent
5. Remedy Of The True And Actual without consent of other owner or owners, or without
Inventor proportionally dividing proceeds therewith. (Sec.
107, IP Code)
If a person, who was deprived of the patent without
his consent or through fraud, is declared by final 7. Limitations Of Patent Rights
court order or decision to be the true and actual
inventor, the court shall order for his substitution as The patentee has no right to prevent third parties in
patentee, or at the option of the true inventor, cancel the following circumstances:
the patent, and award actual and other damages in 1. Using a patented product which has been
his favor if warranted by the circumstances. (Sec. put on the market in the Philippines by the
68, IP Code) owner of the product, or with his express
consent, insofar as such use is performed
The remedies of the true and actual inventor are: after that product has been so put on the
(1) Substitution as patentee, and said market.
(2) Cancellation of the patent
In both remedies, damages may be awarded. Note: With regard to drugs and medicines, the
limitation on patent rights shall apply after a
Note: There must be a final court order declaring drug or medicine has been introduced in the
that he is the true and actual inventor. Philippines or anywhere else in the world. The
right to import the drugs and medicines shall be
Patent Application by Persons not Having the available to any government agency or any
Right to a Patent private third party.
If a person other than the applicant is declared by
final court order or decision as having the right to the 2. Where the act is done privately and on a
patent, such person may, within three (3) months non-commercial scale or for a non-
after the decision has been final: commercial purpose, and the economic
(1) Prosecute the application as his own interests of the patentee are not
application in the place of the applicant significantly prejudiced;
(2) File a new patent application in respect of 3. Where the act consists of making or using
the same invention; exclusively for experimental use of the
(3) Request that the application be refused; or invention for scientific purposes or
(4) Seek cancellation of the patent if one has educational purposes and such other
already been issued. (Sec. 67, IP Code) activities directly related to such scientific
or educational experimental use;
6. Rights Conferred By A Patent 4. In the case of drugs and medicines, where
the act includes testing, using, making or
A patent shall confer on its owner the following selling the invention including any data
exclusive rights: related thereto, solely for purposes
(1) Where the subject matter of a patent is a reasonably related to the development and
product, to restrain, prohibit, and prevent submission of information and issuance of
any unauthorized person or entity from approvals by government regulatory
making, using, offering for sale, selling, or agencies required under any law of the
importing that product. Philippines or of another country that
(2) Where the subject matter of a patent is a regulates the manufacture, construction,
process, to restrain, prevent, or prohibit use or sale of any product;
any unauthorized person or entity from 5. Where the act consists of the preparation
using the process, and from manufacturing, for individual cases, in a pharmacy or by a
dealing in, using, selling or offering for sale, medical professional, of a medicine in
or importing any product obtained directly accordance with a medical prescription or
or indirectly from such process. acts concerning the medicine so prepared;
and
Rights of Joint Owners 6. Where the invention is used in any ship,
If two or more persons own patent and invention vessel, aircraft, or land vehicle of any other
covered thereby, each of the joint owners shall be Philippines temporarily or accidentally.
entitled to personally make, use, sell, or import the
invention for his own profit. Provided, neither of joint Note: Such invention must be used exclusively
owners shall be entitled to grant licenses or to for the needs of the ship, vessel, aircraft, or land
assign his right, title or interest or part thereof
vehicle and not used for the manufacturing of (2) use of a patented process without the
anything to be sold within the Philippines. authorization of the patentee constitutes
patent infringement.
innovative concept and, albeit with some The following provisions shall be deemed prima
modification and change, performs substantially the facie to have an adverse effect on competition
same function in substantially the same way to and trade:
achieve substantially the same result. (Smith Kline a. Those which impose upon the licensee
Beckman Corp. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. the obligation to acquire from a specific
126627, 2003) source capital goods, intermediate
products, raw materials, and other
Under the doctrine of equivalents, there is still patent technologies, or of permanently
infringement when:
employing personnel indicated by the
a. There is an appropriation of the inventive
licensor;
step of a prior invention;
b. The subsequent invention has been b. Those pursuant to which the licensee
modified or changed; and reserves the right to fix the sale or resale
c. Despite such changes, the subsequent prices of the products manufactured on
invention performs substantially the same the basis of the license;
function in substantially the same way to c. Those that contain restrictions regarding
achieve substantially the same result. the volume and structure of production;
d. Those that prohibit the use of competitive
Rationale: Such imitation would leave room for the technologies in a non-exclusive
unscrupulous copyist to make unimportant and technology transfer arrangement;
insubstantial changes and substitutions in the e. Those that establish full or partial
patent which, though adding nothing, would be purchase option in favor of the licensor;
enough to take the copied matter outside the claim, f. Those that obligate the licensee to
and hence outside the reach of the law. (Godines v. transfer for free to the licensor the
Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 97343, 1993) inventions or improvements that may be
obtained through the use of the licensed
b. Defenses in Action for technology;
Infringement g. Those that require payment of royalties
to the owners of patents for patents which
In an action for infringement, the defendant may are not used;
show the invalidity of the patent, or any claim h. Those that prohibit the licensee to export
thereof, on any of the following grounds: the licensed product unless justified for
a. That what is claimed as the invention is not
the protection of the legitimate interest of
new or patentable;
the licensor such as exports to countries
b. That the patent does not disclose the
invention in a manner sufficiently clear where exclusive licenses to manufacture
and complete for it to be carried out by any and/or distribute the licensed product(s)
person skilled in the art; or have already been granted;
c. That the patent is contrary to public order i. Those which restrict the use of the
or morality. technology supplied after the expiration
of the technology transfer arrangement,
NOTE: These are the same grounds for the except in cases of early termination of the
cancellation of a patent. technology transfer arrangement due to
reason(s) attributable to the licensee;
9. Licensing j. Those which require payments for
patents and other industrial property
a. Voluntary rights after their expiration or termination
To encourage the transfer and dissemination of of the technology transfer arrangement;
technology, prevent or control practices and k. Those which require that the technology
conditions that may constitute an abuse of recipient shall not contest the validity of
intellectual property rights having an adverse any of the patents of the technology
effect on competition and trade. supplier;
l. Those which restrict the research and
All technology transfer arrangements must development activities of the licensee
comply with the provisions of the IP Code. designed to absorb and adapt the
transferred technology to local conditions
Prohibited Clauses or to initiate research and development
programs in connection with new during the whole term of the technology transfer
products, processes or equipment; arrangement.
m. Those which prevent the licensee from
adapting the imported technology to local Non-Registration
conditions, or introducing innovation to it, Technology transfer arrangements that conform
as long as it does not impair the with the previous requirements need not be
standards prescribed by the licensor; and registered with the Documentation, Information and
n. Those which exempt the licensor from Technology Transfer Bureau (DITTB). Non-
conformance, however, shall automatically render
liability for non-fulfillment of his
the technology transfer arrangement unenforceable,
responsibilities under the technology
unless the technology transfer agreement is
transfer arrangement and/or liability considered as an exceptional case.
arising from third party suits brought
about by the use of the licensed product Exceptional Cases
or the licensed technology. Non-conformance with the requirements in a
o. Other clauses with equivalent effects.
voluntary licensing contract may be allowed
where, after evaluation by the DITTB, substantial
Mandatory Provisions
benefits will accrue to the economy such as in
The following provisions shall be included in all
the following exceptional or meritorious cases:
voluntary license contracts:
1. High technology content,
1. That the laws of the Philippines shall
2. Increase in foreign exchange earnings,
govern the interpretation of the
3. Employment generation,
agreement and in the event of litigation,
4. Regional dispersal of industries and/or,
the venue shall be the proper court in the
5. Substitution with or use of local raw
place where the licensee has its principal
materials, or
office;
6. Registered companies with pioneer
2. That continued access to improvements
status.
in techniques and processes related to
the technology shall be made available
during the period of the technology b. Compulsory
transfer arrangement; The Director of Legal Affairs may grant license to
3. That, in the event the technology transfer exploit patented invention, even without
arrangement shall provide for arbitration, agreement of patent owner, in favor of any person
the Procedure of Arbitration of the who has shown his capability to exploit invention,
Arbitration Law of the Philippines or the under any of the following circumstances:
Arbitration Law of the United Nations 1. National emergency or other
Commission on International Trade Law circumstances of extreme urgency; or
(UNCITRAL) or the Rules of Conciliation 2. Where public interest, in particular,
and Arbitration of the International national security, nutrition, health or
Chamber of Commerce shall apply and development of other vital sectors of
the venue of arbitration shall be the national economy as determined by the
Philippines or any neutral country; and appropriate agency of the Government,
4. That the Philippine taxes on all payments so requires; or
relating to the technology transfer 3. Where a judicial or administrative body
arrangement shall be borne by the has determined that manner of
licensor. exploitation by patent owner or his
licensee is anti-competitive; or
Rights of Licensor 4. In case of public non-commercial use of
Absent a contrary provision in technology transfer patent by patentee, without satisfactory
arrangement, the grant of a license shall not prevent reason; or
the licensor from granting further licenses to third 5. If patented invention is not being worked
persons nor from exploiting the subject matter of the in Philippines on commercial scale,
technology transfer arrangement himself. although not capable of being worked,
without satisfactory reason: Provided,
Rights of Licensee that importation of patented article shall
The licensee shall be entitled to exploit the subject constitute working or using the patent; or
matter of the technology transfer arrangement
6. Where the demand for patented drugs grant have ceased to exist and are unlikely
and medicines is not being met to an to recur;
adequate extent and on reasonable (6) The patentee shall be paid adequate
terms, as determined by the Secretary of remuneration taking into account the
the Department of Health. (Sec. 96, IP economic value of the grant or
Code) authorization. (Sec. 100, IP Code)
Terms and Conditions of the Compulsory Patent owners shall also have the right to assign,
License transfer by succession the patent, and conclude
(1) The scope and duration of such license licensing contracts for the same.
shall be limited to the purpose for which
it was authorized; NOTE: Patents or applications for patents and
(2) The license shall be non-exclusive; invention to which they relate, shall be protected
(3) The license shall be non-assignable, in the same way as the rights of other property
except with that part of the enterprise or under the Civil Code. (Sec. 103, IP Code)
business with which the invention is
being exploited; Assignment of Inventions
(4) Use of the subject matter of the license An assignment may be of the entire right, title or
shall be devoted predominantly for the interest in and to the patent and the invention
supply of the Philippine market; covered thereby, or of an undivided share of the
entire patent and invention, in which event the
Note: This shall not apply where the grant of parties become joint owners thereof. An
the license is based on the ground that the assignment may be limited to a specified territory.
patentee’s manner of exploiting the patent is (Sec. 104, IP Code)
determined by judicial or administrative
process to be anti-competitive. Form of Assignment
The assignment must be in writing,
(5) The license may be terminated upon proper acknowledged before a notary public or other
showing that circumstances which led to its officer authorized to administer oath or perform
notarial acts, and certified under the hand and COLLECTIVE Any visible sign designated as
official seal of the notary or such other officer. MARK such in the application for
(Sec. 105, IP Code) registration and capable of
distinguishing the origin or any
Requirements for Recording of Assignment other common characteristic,
i. It must be in writing and accompanied by including the quality of goods or
an English translation, if it is in a services of different enterprises
language other than English or Filipino; which use the sign under the
ii. It must be notarized; control of the registered owner
iii. It must be accompanied by an of the collective mark. (Sec.
121.2, IP Code)
appointment of a resident agent, if the
TRADE Any name or designation
assignee is not residing in the
NAME identifying or distinguishing an
Philippines; enterprise (Sec. 121.3, IP
iv. It must identify the letters patent involved Code);
by number and date and give the name
of the owner of the patent and the title of A name or designation may not be used as a trade
the invention. In the case of an name if, by its nature or the use to which such name
application for a patent, it should state or designation may be put:
the application number and the filing date 1. It is contrary to public order or morals;
of the application and give the name of 2. It is liable to deceive trade circles or the
the applicant and the title of the invention. public as to the nature of the enterprise
If the assignment was executed identified by that name; or
concurrently with or subsequent to the 3. It is similar to a mark or a trade name
execution of the application but before owned by another person and its use would
the application is filed or before its likely mislead the public.
application number is ascertained, it
should adequately identify the application A trade name refers to the business and its goodwill;
by its date of execution, the name of the a trademark refers to the goods. (Canon Kabushiki
applicant, and the title of the invention. Kaisha v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 120900, 2000)
v. It must be accompanied by the required
Spectrum of Distinctiveness of Trademark
fees.
(Zantarain’s Inc. v. Old Grove Smokehouse, 698
F.2d 786, 1983) (from weakest to strongest)
B. TRADEMARKS 1. Generic – refers to a particular genus or class
of which an individual article or service is a
Modern authorities on trademark law view member (e.g. escalator, cellophane, etc.)
trademarks as performing three distinct functions: a. It can never attain trademark
(1) they indicate origin or ownership of the protection.
articles to which they are attached; b. If a registered trademark becomes
(2) they guarantee that those articles come up generic as to a particular product or
to a certain standard of quality; and service, the mark’s registration is
(3) they advertise the articles they symbolize. subject to cancellation.
(Mirpuri v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 2. Descriptive – identifies a characteristic or
114508, 1999) quality of an article or service such as its color,
odor, function, dimensions, or ingredients
1. Marks Vs. Collective Marks Vs.
Trade Names General Rule: It is not ordinarily protectable as
a trademark because, like a generic term, it
MARK Any visible sign capable of: belongs to the public domain. (Ong Ai Gui v.
a. distinguishing the goods Director of Patents, G.R. No. L-6235, 1955)
(trademark) or services
(service mark) of an Exception: When the doctrine of secondary
enterprise and meaning applies in such a way that it has
b. shall include a stamped or acquired a secondary meaning in the minds of
marked container of the consumers. (Sec. 123.2)
goods. (Sec. 121.1, IP
Code)
Doctrine of Secondary Meaning In particular, any subsequent use of the trade name
A word or phrase originally incapable of exclusive by a third party, whether as a trade name or a mark
appropriation with reference to an article in the or collective mark, or any such use of a similar trade
market (because it is geographically or otherwise name or mark, likely to mislead the public, shall be
descriptive) might nevertheless have been used for deemed unlawful. (Sec. 165.2.b, IP Code)
so long and so exclusively by one producer with
reference to his article that, in the trade and to that Doctrine of Secondary Meaning Applicable to
branch of the purchasing public, the word or phrase Trade Names
has come to mean that the article was his property. The doctrine’s application has been extended to
(Pearl & Dean (Phil.) v. Shoemart, G.R. No. 148222, corporate names since the right to use a corporate
2003) name to the exclusion of others is based upon the
same principle which underlies the right to use a
particular trademark or tradename. (Lyceum of the
Philippines, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. those with respect to which registration is
101897, 1993) applied for.
Court Has The Authority to Determine Right to The “likelihood of confusion” is the gravamen of
Registration trademark infringement. But likelihood of confusion
In any action involving a registered mark, the court is a relative concept, the particular, and sometimes
may determine the right to registration, order the peculiar, circumstances of each case being
cancellation of a registration, in whole or in part, and determinative of its existence. Thus, in trademark
otherwise rectify the register with respect to the infringement cases, more than in other kinds of
registration of any party to the action in the exercise litigation, precedents must be evaluated in the light
of this. Judgment and orders shall be certified by the of each particular case. (Philip Morris, Inc. v.
court to the Director, who shall make appropriate Fortune Tobacco Corp., G.R. No. 158589, 2006)
entry upon the records of the Bureau, and shall be
controlled thereby. (Section 161, IP Code) Elements of Trademark Infringement
To establish trademark infringement, the following
Filing of a suit to enforce a mark v. petition to elements must be shown:
cancel a mark i. The validity of plaintiff’s mark;
The filing of a suit to enforce the registered mark ii. The plaintiff’s ownership of the mark;
with the proper court or agency shall exclude any and
other court or agency from assuming jurisdiction iii. The use of the mark or its colorable
over a subsequently filed petition to cancel the same imitation by the alleged infringer results
mark. On the other hand, the earlier filing of petition in “likelihood of confusion.”
to cancel the mark with the Bureau of Legal Affairs (McDonald's Corp. v. L.C. Big Mak
shall not constitute a prejudicial question that must Burger, Inc., G.R. No. 143993, 2004)
be resolved before an action to enforce the rights to
same registered mark may be decided. (Sec. 17, Test to Determine Likelihood And Confusion
R.A. No. 166a) Dominancy Test – Focuses on the similarities of the
prevalent features of the competing trademarks that
9. Trademark Infringement might cause confusion of deception. (Mcdonald’s v.
Big Mak, G.R. No. 143993, 2004)
The measure of the damages suffered shall be destroyed without compensation of any sort. (Sec.
either: 157.1, IP Code)
1. The reasonable profit which the
complaining party would have made had 10. Unfair Competition
the defendant not infringed his rights, or
2. The profit which the defendant actually A person who has identified in the mind of the public
made out of the infringement. the goods he manufactures or deals in, his business
or services from those of others, whether or not a
If the measure of damages cannot be readily registered mark is employed, has a property right in
ascertained with reasonable certainty, the court may the goodwill of the said goods, business or services
award as damages a reasonable percentage based so identified, which will be protected in the same
upon the amount of gross sales of the defendant or manner as other property rights. (Sec. 168.1, IP
the value of the services in connection with which Code)
the mark or trade name was used in the
infringement of the rights of the complaining party. Any person who shall employ deception or any other
(Sec. 156.1, IP Code) means contrary to good faith by which he shall pass
off the goods manufactured by him or in which he
NOTE: Where there was actual intent to mislead the deals, or his business, or services for those of the
public or to defraud the complainant, the court may one having established such goodwill, or who shall
double the amount of damages to be awarded. (Sec. commit any acts calculated to produce said result,
156.3, IP Code) shall be guilty of unfair competition. (Sec. 168.2, IP
Code)
On application of the complainant, the court may
impound during the pendency of the action, sales Any conduct the end and probable effect of which is
invoices and other documents evidencing sales. to deceive the public or pass off the goods or
(Sec. 156.2, IP Code) business of a person as that for another constitutes
actionable unfair competition. (Alhambra Cigar vs.
b. Requirement of Notice Mojica, G.R. No. L-8937, 1914)
In any suit for infringement, the owner of the
registered mark shall not be entitled to recover Essentially, what the law punishes is the act of
profits or damages UNLESS the acts have been giving one’s goods the general appearance of the
committed with knowledge that such imitation is goods of another, which would likely mislead the
likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to buyer into believing that such goods belong to the
deceive. Such knowledge is presumed if: latter. (Manuel C. Espiritu et. al. v. Petron Corp. et.
1. The registrant gives notice that his mark is al., G.R. No. 170891, 2009)
registered by displaying with the mark the
words “Registered Mark” or the letter R The “true test” of unfair competition is whether the
within a circle, or acts of the defendant have the intent of deceiving or
2. The defendant had otherwise actual notice are calculated to deceive the ordinary buyer making
of the registration. (Sec. 158, IP Code) his purchases under the ordinary conditions of the
particular trade to which the controversy relates.
c. Penalties One of the essential requisites in an action to
Independent of the civil and administrative restrain unfair competition is proof of fraud; the
sanctions imposed by law, a criminal penalty of intent to deceive, actual or probable must be shown
imprisonment from 2 to 5 years and a fine ranging before the right to recover can exist. (Superior
from P50,000 to P200,000 shall be imposed on any Commercial Enterprises v. Kunnan Enterprises Ltd.,
person who is found guilty of committing any of the et. al., G.R. No. 169974, 2010)
acts of trademark infringement, unfair competition,
or false description or representation. (Sec. 170, IP Trademark Infringement vs. Unfair Competition
Code) The law on unfair competition is broader and more
inclusive than the law on trademark infringement.
Power of Court to Order Infringing Material Trademark infringement is more limited, but it
Destroyed recognizes a more exclusive right derived from the
In any action involving a violation of a right of the trademark adoption and registration by the person
owner of the registered mark, the court may order whose goods or business is first associated with it.
that goods found to be infringing be disposed of The law on trademarks is a specialized subject
outside the channels of commerce in such a manner distinct from the law on unfair competition, although
as to avoid any harm caused to the right holder or the two subjects are entwined with each other and
are dealt with together in the IP Code.
General Rule: Prior approval of the government Rental - Transfer of the possession of the original or
agency or office wherein the work is created shall be a copy of a work or a sound recording for a limited
necessary for exploitation of such work for profit. period of time, for profit-making purposes
Such agency or office may impose as a condition 5. Public display of the original or a copy of the
the payment of royalties. work;
6. Public performance of the work; and
Exception: No prior approval or conditions shall be
required for the use of any purpose of: Definitions of Public Performance
1. Statutes, rules and regulations, or a. For Non-audiovisual work – reciting,
b. Distributing the article for purpose of trade, into the channels of commerce of imported
or for any other purpose to an extent that goods that involve an infringement, immediately
will prejudice the rights of the copyright after customs clearance of such goods.
owner in the work; or
c. Trade exhibit of the article in public. (Sec. b. To pay to the copyright proprietor or his assigns
217.3, IP Code) or heirs such actual damages, including legal
costs and other expenses, as he may have
Copyright Infringement incurred due to the infringement as well as the
Infringement of a copyright is a trespass on a private profits the infringer may have made due to such
domain owned and occupied by the owner of the infringement.
copyright, and, therefore, protected by law, and
infringement of copyright, or piracy, which is a Note: In proving profits, the plaintiff shall be
synonymous term in this connection, consists in the required to prove sales only and the defendant
doing by any person, without the consent of the shall be required to prove every element of cost
owner of the copyright, of anything the sole right to which he claims or, in lieu of actual damages
do which is conferred by statute on the owner of the and profits, such damages which, to the court,
copyright. (Columbia Pictures, Inc. v. Court of shall appear to be just and shall not be regarded
Appeals, G.R. No. 110318, 1996) as penalty.
Penalties
Imprisonment of between 1 to
FIRST
3 years and a fine of between
OFFENSE
50,000 to 150,000 pesos
Imprisonment of 3 years and 1
SECOND day to six years plus a fine of
OFFENSE between 150,000 to 500,000
pesos
Imprisonment of 6 years and 1
THIRD AND
day to 9 years plus a fine
SUBSEQUENT
ranging from 500,000 to
OFFENSES
1,500,000 pesos
Electronic Signature
Any distinctive mark, characteristic and/or sound in
electronic form, representing the identity of a person
and attached to or logically associated with the
electronic data message or electronic document or
any methodology or procedures employed or
adopted by a person and executed or adopted by
such person with the intention of authenticating or
approving an electronic data message or electronic
document. (Section 5 (e))
Electronic Document
Information or the representation of information,
data, figures, symbols or other modes of written
expression, described or however represented, by
which a right is established or an obligation
extinguished, or by which a fact may be proved and
affirmed, which is received, recorded, transmitted,
stored, processed, retrieved or produced
electronically. (Section 5 (f))
electronic signature is not reasonable under the 1. The electronic signature shall be authenticated
circumstances. (Section 14(b), IRR) by proof that a letter, character, number or other
symbol in electronic form representing the
Original Documents (SECTION 10, ECA; Section persons named in and attached to or logically
11, IRR) associated with an electronic data message,
electronic document, or that the appropriate
Where the law requires information to be presented methodology or security procedures, when
or retained in its original form, that requirement is
applicable, were employed or adopted by a
met by an electronic data message or electronic
document if: person and executed or adopted by such
1. There exists a reliable assurance as to the person, with the intention of authenticating or
integrity of the electronic document or electronic approving an electronic data message or
data message from the time when it was first electronic document;
generated in its final form and such integrity is 2. The electronic data message or electronic
shown by evidence aliunde (that is, evidence document shall be authenticated by proof that
other than the electronic data message itself) or an appropriate security procedure, when
otherwise; and (Section 11(a), IRR) applicable was adopted and employed for the
2. The electronic document or electronic data purpose of verifying the originator of an
message is capable of being displayed to the electronic data message or electronic
person to whom it is to be presented. (Section document, or detecting error or alteration in the
11(b), IRR) communication, content or storage of an
electronic document or electronic data
In relation to the existence of a reliable assurance message from a specific point, which, using
as to the integrity of the electronic document or algorithm or codes, identifying words or
electronic data message, as provided under Section numbers, encryptions, answers back or
11(a) of the IRR: acknowledgment procedures, or similar security
1. The criteria for assessing integrity shall be devices.
whether the information has remained complete
and unaltered, apart from the addition of any Other Authentication Procedures
endorsement and any change which arises in The Supreme Court may adopt such other
the normal course of communication, storage authentication procedures, including the use of
and display; and (Section 11(c)(i), IRR) electronic notarization systems as necessary and
2. The standard of reliability required shall be advisable, as well as the certificate of authentication
assessed in the light of the purpose for which on printed or hard copies of the electronic
documents or electronic data messages by
the information was generated and in the light
electronic notaries, service providers and other duly
of all the relevant circumstances. (Section recognized or appointed certification authorities.
11(c)(ii), IRR)
Burden of Proving Authenticity
Note: These requirements applies whether the The person seeking to introduce an electronic data
requirement therein is in the form of an obligation or message or electronic document in any legal
whether the law simply provides consequences for proceeding has the burden of proving its authenticity
the information not being presented or retained in its by evidence capable of supporting a finding that the
original form. (Section 10, ECA) electronic data message or electronic document is
what the person claims it to be.
AUTHENTICATION OF ELECTRONIC DATA
MESSAGES AND ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS Establishment of Integrity of Information and
(SECTION 11) Communication System
In the absence of evidence to the contrary, the
Until the Supreme Court by appropriate rules shall integrity of the information and communication
have so provided, electronic documents, electronic system in which an electronic data message or
data messages and electronic signatures, shall be electronic document is recorded or stored may be
authenticated by demonstrating, substantiating and established in any legal proceeding:
validating a claimed identity of a user, device, or 1. By evidence that at all material times the
another entity in an information or communication information and communication system or other
system, among other ways, as follows: similar device was operating in a manner that
did not affect the integrity of the electronic data signatures, may be presumed to have been
message or electronic document, and there are established by an affidavit given to the best of the
no other reasonable grounds to doubt the deponent's or affiant's personal knowledge subject
integrity of the information and communication to the rights of parties in interest to cross-examine
system; such deponent or affiant as a matter of right.
(Section 19, IRR)
2. By showing that the electronic data message or
electronic document was recorded or stored by
Cross-Examination
a party to the proceedings who is adverse in A deponent of an affidavit that has been introduced
interest to the party using it; or in evidence may be cross-examined as of right by a
3. By showing that the electronic data message or party to the proceedings who is adverse in interest
electronic document was recorded or stored in to the party who has introduced the affidavit or has
the usual and ordinary course of business by a caused the affidavit to be introduced. (Section
person who is not a party to the proceedings 15(1), ECA)
and who did not act under the control of the
party using the record. The person who is not a party to the proceedings
and who did not act under the control of the party
RETENTION OF ELECTRONIC DATA MESSAGE using the electronic data message or electronic
OR ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT (SECTION 13) document may also be cross-examined provided
that the electronic data message or electronic
Notwithstanding any provision of law, rule or document was recorded or stored in the usual and
regulation to the contrary, the requirement in any ordinary course of business by the former. (Section
provision of law that certain documents be retained 15(2), ECA)
in their original form is satisfied by retaining them in
the form of an electronic data message or electronic
document which: C. ADMISSIBILITY AND EVIDENTIAL
1. Remains accessible so as to be usable for WEIGHT OF ELECTRONIC DATA
subsequent reference; (Section 20(a)(i), IRR) MESSAGE OR ELECTRONIC
2. Is retained in the format in which it was DOCUMENT
generated, sent or received, or in a format
which can be demonstrated to accurately ADMISSIBILITY AND EVIDENTIAL WEIGHT OF
represent the electronic data message or ELECTRONIC DATA MESSAGES AND
electronic document generated, sent or ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS (SECTION 12)
received; and (Section 20(a)(ii), IRR)
For evidentiary purposes, an electronic document or
3. Where applicable, enables the identification electronic data message shall be the functional
of its originator and addressee, as well as the equivalent of a written document under existing
determination of the date and the time it was laws. (Section 18, IRR)
sent or received. (Section 20(a)(iii), IRR)
Admissibility
Note: These requirements are satisfied by using the In any legal proceeding, nothing in the application of
services of a third party, provided that the conditions the rules on evidence shall deny the admissibility of
set forth above are met. (Section 20(b), IRR) an electronic data message or electronic document
in evidence:
Relevant government agencies tasked with 1. On the sole ground that it is in electronic form;
enforcing or implementing applicable laws relating or (Section 18(a), IRR)
to the retention of certain documents may, by 2. On the ground that it is not in the standard
appropriate issuances, impose regulations to written form. (Section 18(b), IRR)
ensure the integrity, reliability of such documents
and its proper implementation. (Section 20(c), IRR) Note: The DPA and IRR does not modify any
statutory rule relating to the admissibility of
PROOF BY AFFIDAVIT AND CROSS- electronic data messages or electronic documents,
EXAMINATION (SECTIONS 14 and 15; Section except the rules relating to authentication and best
19, IRR)
evidence. (Section 18, IRR)
Proof by Affidavit Evidential Weight
The matters on admissibility and evidentiary weight, In assessing the evidential weight of an electronic
and on the presumption of integrity of electronic data message or electronic document, the reliability
D. OBLIGATION OF CONFIDENTIALITY
-- end of topic --
“Foreign Corporation”
1. A corporation formed, organized or existing
under any law other than those of the
Philippines, and
2. whose laws allow Filipino citizens and
corporations to do business in its own
country or state – reciprocity clause.
(Revised Corporation Code, Sec. 140)
Branch office
Carries out the business activities of the head office
and derives income from the host country.
(Implementing Rules and Regulations of RA 7042,
Taxation of Income: General Rules Control Test -– the nationality of the corporation
depends upon the nationality of the controlling
DOMESTIC BRANCH REGIONAL
stockholders
SUBSIDIARY OFFICE HQ
Taxed on Only Not allowed Note: While the incorporation test serves as the
worldwide Philippine to generate primary test under Philippine jurisdiction, the
income source income “control test” and, in appropriate cases, the
income is “grandfather rule” is applied to determine
taxed
compliance with the Constitution and other laws on certain percentage of control of stock, the Test of
nationality requirements. Controlling Ownership would be applied.
Grandfather Rule – the combined totals in the 3rd step: If there is doubt as to the domestic control
investing corporation and the investee corporation of the percentage of stock in a corporation with
must be traced (i.e. “grandfathered”) to determine corporate stockholders, Grandfather test would be
the total percentage of Filipino ownership. applied (Narra Nickel Mining and Development
Corp. v. Redmont Consolidated Mines Corp.,722
All covered corporations shall, at all times, observe SCRA 382 [2014]).
the constitutional or statutory ownership
requirement. For purposes of determining The issue in the case of Gamboa v. Teves is the
compliance therewith, the required percentage of proper interpretation of the word “capital” in Section
Filipino ownership shall be applied to BOTH (a) the 11, Article 12 of the 1987 Constitution. For a
total number of outstanding shares of stock entitled corporation to be granted authority to operate a
to vote in the election of directors AND (b) the total public utility, at least sixty percent (60%) of the
number of outstanding shares of stock, whether or capital must be Filipino. The Court holds that the
not entitled to vote in the election of directors. term capital must be interpreted to refer to shares of
(Section 2, SEC Memorandum Circular No. 08-13 stock entitled to vote in the election of directors.
dated May 20, 2013) Sixty percent (60%) of capital must assume a
controlling interest over the company.(Gamboa v.
Basis of Computation of 60-40 percentage Finance Secretary Margarito Teves, 652 SCRA 690
requirement: [2011], .G.R. No. 176579, June 28, 2011)
● Under existing laws, the basis is the total
number of outstanding capital stock, The 60-40 ownership requirement applies not only
irrespective of the amount of the par value to voting control, but also to beneficial control of the
of the shares. corporation. Both the Voting Control Test and the
● Under the Control Test, once it is Beneficial Ownership Test must be applied to
established that the corporation is at determine whether a corporation is
least 60% owned by Filipinos, it is no Filipino.(Gamboa v. Finance Secretary Margarito
longer necessary to conduct any further Teves 682 SCRA 397 [October 9,2012])
inquiry as to the ownership of the
shareholders of the investing All covered corporations shall, at all times, observe
corporation since the entire company at the constitutional or statutory ownership
least 60% Filipino owned is already requirement. For purposes of determining
considered a Filipino entity. compliance therewith, the required percentage of
● However, a Filipino entity (60% Filipino- Filipino ownership shall be applied to BOTH (a) the
owned) is not qualified to invest in or enter total number of outstanding shares of stock entitled
into a joint venture agreement with to vote in the election of directors; AND (b) the total
corporations or partnerships, the capital or number of outstanding shares of stock, whether or
ownership of which, under the Constitution not entitled to vote in the election of directors.
or special laws, are limited exclusively to (Section 2, SEC Memorandum Circular No. 08-13
Filipino citizens. dated May 20, 2013)
● The shares of former Filipino citizens who
became citizens of foreign countries but Petitioners in Roy v. Herbosa alleged that SEC-MC
who reacquired Philippine citizenship under No. 8 is in violation of the Supreme Court’s ruling in
the RA 9225 (Citizenship Retention and Gamboa v. Teves. The Court upheld the validity of
Reacquisition Act of 2003” are considered SEC-MC No. 8. The Gamboa decision held that
as Filipino Investments. what the Constitution requires is that full and legal
beneficial ownership of 60% of outstanding capital
In order to determine the nationality of a corporation, stock, coupled with 60% of voting rights, must rest
the following steps should apply: in the hands of Filipinos, which is precisely what
SEC-MC No. 8 requires. In constructing beneficial
1st Step: The nationality of a corporation is ownership, the IRR of the FIA and the IRR of the
determined by the country under whose laws it is Securities and Regulation Code both provide that
incorporated (Place of Incorporation Test). such requires voting rights. If a Filipino has voting
2nd Step: If the corporation is applying for a (2nd) power, or investment power (can dispose), or both,
franchise for public utility and etc. which requires a he is considered the beneficial owner. (Roy III v.
based on considerations of sound public policy Capacity to sue is a personal qualification, thus if
(Eriks PTE Ltd. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. successor in interest of the disqualified entity is
118843, February 6, 1997) qualified to sue, then the restriction does not apply
(Lorenz Shipping v. Chubb & Sons, G.R. No.
To constitute “doing business”, the activity to be 147724 June 8, 2004)
undertaken is one that is for profit-making. (Agilent
v. Integrated Silicon, G.R. No. 154618, April 14,
A letter of intent to enter a bid is not an act sufficient
2004)
enough to constitute an intent to do business. A
bidder must win the bid first before acquiring a
For purposes of having summons served on a
license. (Steelcase Inc v Design International
foreign corporation, it is sufficient that it be alleged
Selections, G.R. No. 171995, April 18, 2012)
that the foreign corporation is doing business in the
Philippines. (Alfred Hahn v. Court of Appeals, G.R.
No. 113074 January 22, 1997) A foreign entity may bring an action in Philippine
courts to enforce an insurance policy, executed
The mere act of exporting from one's own country abroad, even if it has no license to do business since
without doing any specific commercial acts within such insurance contract did not arise from a
the territory of the importing country cannot be business transaction done here in the Philippines.
deemed as doing business in the importing country (Universal Shipping Lines, Inc. v IAC
(B Van Zuiden v GTVL Manufacturing Industries.
G.R. No. 147905, May 28, 2007) NATURE SUE BE SUED
A series of separate deliveries for one single order Doing May sue May be sued
is considered as an isolated transaction. However, Business
a series of commercial dealings (unique and With
independent from one another) signifies an intent to License
do business in the Philippines. A grant of a 90-day Doing Cannot May be sued
credit term is proof of an intention to continue Business Sue
transacting with the domestic client. (Eriks PTE Ltd. Without
v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 118843. February 6, License
1997) Isolated May GR: May not be
Transaction sue sued
A foreign corporation doing business in the jurisdiction
Philippines without a license may sue in Philippine over foreign
courts a Philippine citizen or entity that had corp.
contracted with and benefited from it. (European
Resources and Technologies Inc. and Delfin J. Except: consent
Wenceslao v. Ingenieuburo Birkhahn + Nolte, G.R. through a
No. 159586, July 26, 2004) contractual
stipulation
A foreign entity bringing an action to protect a
trademark right needs no license to do business in 3. Export Enterprise
order to access the domestic courts because it does
not seek to enforce any contractual right arising from
any business transaction. (General Garments “Export enterprise” shall mean:
Corporation v. Director of Patents, G.R. No. L-24295 1. an enterprise wherein a manufacturer,
September 30, 1971) processor or service (including tourism)
enterprise exports sixty percent (60%) or
more of its output, or
Where a single act or transaction of a foreign 2. Wherein a trader purchases products
corporation is not merely incidental or casual but is domestically and exports sixty percent
of such character as distinctly to indicate a purpose (60%) or more of such purchases. (Sec.
on the part of the foreign corporation to do other 3[e], Implementing Rules and Regulations
business in the state, such act will be considered as of RA 7042 as amended] Rule 1 §1 (g)]
constituting doing business. (Litton Mills v. Court of
Appeals, G.R. No. 94980. May 15, 1996)
4. Domestic Market Enterprise
Regulations of R.A. 7042, IRR of continuing compliance of the export enterprise with
RA 7042, [1991]) its export requirement. (Sec 6)
3. Additional requirements to be submitted to
the : SEC STEP 2. BOI shall advise SEC or BTRCP, as the
a. Clearance from the DND or PNP case may be, of any export enterprise that fails to
(for enterprises wishing to engage meet the export ratio requirement. (Sec 6)
in defense-related activities)
b. Certificate from the DOST that the STEP 3. The SEC or BTRCP shall thereupon order
investment involves advanced the non-complying export enterprise to reduce its
technology shall be submitted (for sales to the domestic market to not more than forty
small and medium-sized domestic percent (40%) of its total production; failure to
market enterprises with paid-in comply with such SEC or BTRCP order, without
equity capital less than the justifiable reason, shall subject the enterprise to
equivalent of US$500,000) cancellation of SEC or BTRCP registration, and/or
(Implementing Rules and the penalties provided in Section 14 hereof. (Sec 6)
Regulations of R.A. 7042, IRR of
RA 7042, [1991]) E. Foreign Investments in Domestic
4. Application Fee Market Enterprises [Sec. 7, RA 7042]
STEP 3. Registration with the BTRCP Bureau of Non-Philippine nationals may own up to one
Trade Regulation and Consumer Protection hundred percent (100%) of domestic market
Department of Trade and Industry (BTRCP-DTI) enterprises unless foreign ownership therein is
1. As required by existing laws and prohibited or limited by existing law or the Foreign
regulations, BTRCP Form No. 17 and Investment Negative List under Section 8 hereof.
accompanying documents shall be
submitted to BTRCP.
A domestic market enterprise may change its status
2. All documents executed abroad should be
to export enterprise if over a three (3) year period it
authenticated by the Philippine Embassy or
consistently exports in each year thereof sixty per
Consular Office.
cent (60%) or more of its output. (Sec. 7)
3. Application Fee. A reasonable application
fee to be determined by BTRCP shall be
collected from each applicant. At its option, a domestic market enterprise may
4. Upon fulfilment of all BTRCP-DTI change its status to an export enterprise if, over the
requirements and favorable evaluation by last three (3) years, it consistently exported in each
DTI, the Certificate of Registration for Sole year thereof sixty percent (60%) or more of its
Proprietorship shall be issued by DTI. In output. (Implementing Rules and Regulations of
case of disapproval, DTI shall also inform R.A. 7042, IRR of RA 7042, [1991])
the applicant in writing of the reasons for
the disapproval of the registration. F. Foreign Investment Negative List
(Implementing Rules and Regulations of [Sec. 8, RA 11647]
R.A. 7042, IRR of RA 7042, [1991])
“Foreign Investments Negative List” or
D. Foreign Investments in Export “Negative List” shall mean a list of areas of
Enterprises [Sec. 7, RA 11647] economic activity whose foreign ownership is limited
to a maximum of forty percent (40%) of the equity
Foreign equity participation in export capital of the enterprises engaged therein. (Sec
enterprises shall be allowed up to one hundred 3[g])
percent (100%) provided that the products and
services of such enterprises do not fall within Lists
The Foreign Investment Negative List shall have two
A and B of the FINL. (Implementing Rules and
(2) components lists; A, and B.
Regulations of RA 7042 (as amended by RA 8179
July 9, 1996) Rule VI §1)
List A shall enumerate the areas of activities
reserved to Philippine nationals by mandate of the
Steps In The Registration Of Export Enterprises
Constitution and specific laws.
STEP 1. Export enterprises which are non-
Philippine nationals shall register with BOI and
List B shall contain the areas of activities and
submit the reports that may be required to ensure
enterprises regulated pursuant to law:
National Security
Refers to the requirements and conditions
necessary to ensure the territorial integrity of the
country and the safety, security, and well-being of
Filipino citizens. (Sec. 2, Rule I, Implementing Rules
and Regulations of RA 11659, amending CA 146)
B. FOREIGN STATE-OWNED
ENTERPRISE
Foreign State-owned Enterprise refers to an entity
in which a foreign State: (OCA)
a. Directly or indirectly Owns more than q. Toll Regulatory Board (TRB). (PSA, RA
fifty percent (50%) of the capital taking 11659, Sec. 3)
into account both the voting rights and
beneficial ownership; b. Authority of Congress
b. Controls, through ownership interests, Nothing in the PSA shall be interpreted to diminish,
the exercise of more than fifty percent limit, or restrict the authority of Congress from
(50%) of the voting rights; or granting franchises to public services, including
c. Holds the power to Appoint a majority public utilities, and other activities, as may be
of members of the board of directors or provided by law.
any other equivalent management
body. (PSA, RA 11659, Sec. 2[g]) GR: Any franchise or certificate necessary for the
operation of a public service shall be granted by
C. PUBLIC SERVICE AS PUBLIC UTILITY Congress
XPN: previously delegated by law to the relevant
a. Jurisdiction and Supervision Administrative Agencies. (PSA, RA 11659, Sec. 4)
over all Public Services, Public
Utilities, Franchises, c. Public Utility
Equipment, and other Public utility refers to a public service that operates,
manages or controls for public use any of the
Properties
following: (DTPe-WaSP)
The Commission shall have jurisdiction and
• Distribution of Electricity;
supervision over all public services, including public
utilities, and their franchises, equipment, and other • Transmission of Electricity;
properties, and in the exercise of its authority, it shall • Petroleum and Petroleum Products
have the necessary powers and the aid of public Pipeline Transmission Systems;
force: Provided, That public services, including • Water Pipeline Distribution Systems and
public utilities, owned or operated by government Wastewater Pipeline Systems, including
entities or government-owned or controlled sewerage pipeline systems
corporations shall be regulated by the Commission • Seaports; and
in the same way as privately-owned public services. • Public Utility Vehicles. (PSA, RA 11659,
(PSA, RA 11659, Sec. 4) Sec. 4)
Water Pipeline Distribution Systems and • All concessionaires, joint ventures and
Wastewater Pipeline Systems, including other similar entities that wholly operate,
sewerage pipeline systems manage or control for public use the sectors
Refer to the operation and maintenance of water above are public utilities. (PSA, RA 11659,
pipeline distribution systems to ensure an Sec. 4)
uninterrupted and adequate supply and distribution • Legislative franchise is not the only mode
of potable water for domestic and other purposes of authorization to operate a public utility.
and the operation and maintenance of wastewater Nothing in Article XII, Section 11of the
pipeline systems, except desludging companies and Constitution implies that only the Congress
septic tanks, to ensure public health and safety, as has the authority to grant such
regulated by Republic Act No. 6234, entitled "An Act authorization. (Albano v. Reyes, G.R. No.
Creating the Metropolitan Waterworks and 83551, 11 July 1989)
Sewerage System and Dissolving the National • It is not the ownership but the operation of
Waterworks and Sewerage Authority; and for Other the facilities used to provide the public
Purposes," as amended, and Presidential Decree service that vests the status as public utility.
No. 198, otherwise known as the "Provincial Water (Tatad v. Garcia Jr., G.R. No. 114222, 06
Utilities Act of 1973," as amended. (PSA, RA 11659, August 1995)
Sec. 2) • Manila Water and Maynilad are public
utilities. They are privately owned and
Seaports operated business entities engaged in
Refers to a place where ships may anchor or tie up regularly supplying water-the most basic of
for the purpose of shelter, repair, loading or all necessities or human survival. As
discharge of passengers or cargo, or for other such provided in the Concession Agreements,
activities connected with water-borne commerce, they are to serve an indefinite public, at
and including all the land and water areas and the least within their respective service areas.
structures, equipment and facilities related to these o Manila Water and Maynilad
functions, as defined by the charters of relevant contend that they are not public
authorities or agencies, such as the Philippine Ports utilities but rather they are mere
Authority, Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority, "contractors" and "agents" bases
PHIVIDEC Industrial Estate Authority, Cebu Port on the Concession Agreements
Authority, local government units, and other similar with Metropolitan Waterworks and
agencies or government bodies. (PSA, RA 11659, Sewerage System (MWSS), the
Sec. 2) public utility and legislative
franchise holder. The Court held
Public Utility Vehicles that that the legislative franchise of
Refer to internal combustion engine vehicles that MWSS did not prevent the
carry passengers and/or domestic cargo for a fee, declaration of Manila Water and
offering services to the public, namely trucks-for- Maynilad's status as public
hire, UV express service, public utility buses utilities. (Maynilad Water Services,
(PUBs), public utility jeepneys (PUJs), tricycles, Inc. v. National Water and
filcabs, and taxis. (PSA, RA 11659, Sec. 2) Resources Board, G.R. 181764,
16 May 2023)
Note:
• Transport vehicles accredited with and Note: Nothing in the PSA shall be interpreted as a
operating through transport network requirement for legislative franchise where the law
corporations shall not be considered as does not require any. No other person shall be
public utility vehicles. (PSA, RA 11659, deemed a public utility unless otherwise
Sec. 2) subsequently provided by law. (PSA, RA 11659,
• Generation of electricity shall not be Sec. 4)
considered a public utility operation. (Sec.
1 Rule 5, Rules and Regulations d. Recommendatory Power of the
Implementing RA 9136, “Electric Power President to Congress
Industry Reform Act of 2001”) Upon the recommendation of the National Economic
• Supply of electricity shall not be considered and Development Authority (NEDA), the President
public utility operation. (Sec. 29, RA 9136, may recommend to Congress the classification of a
“Electric Power Industry Reform Act of public service as a public utility on the basis of the
2001”) following criteria: (ReNa-NeO)
a. The person or juridical entity Regularly operational resiliency at risk. (PSA, RA 11659, Sec.
supplies and transmits and distributes to 4)
the public through a network a commodity
or service of public consequence; D. UNLAWFUL ACTS
b. The commodity or service is a Natural It shall be unlawful for any public service: (ProM-
monopoly that needs to be regulated when C-Urge)
the common good so requires; 1. To Provide or maintain any service that is
unsafe, improper, or inadequate, or
Note: natural monopoly exists when the market withhold or refuse any service which
demand for a commodity or service can be supplied can reasonably be demanded and
by a single entity at a lower cost than by two or more furnished, as found and determined by the
entities. Commission in a final order which shall be
conclusive and shall take effect in
c. The commodity or service is Necessary for accordance with the PSA, upon appeal or
the maintenance of life and occupation of otherwise. (PSA, CA 146 as amended,
the public; and Sec. 19)
d. The commodity or service is Obligated to
provide adequate service to the public on 2. To Make or give, directly or indirectly, by
demand. (PSA, RA 11659, Sec. 4) itself or through its agents, attorneys or
brokers, or any of them, discounts or
Note: All public services, including those classified rebates on authorized rates, or
as public utilities under the PSA, shall continue to be
regulated and supervised by the relevant grant credit for the payment of freight
Administrative Agencies under existing laws. (PSA, charges, or any undue or unreasonable
RA 11659, Sec. 4) preference or advantage to any person or
corporation or to any locality or to any
Note: A public service which is not classified as a particular description of traffic or service, or
public utility under the PSA shall be considered a
business affected with public interest for subject any particular person or corporation
purposes of Sections 17 and 18 of Article XII of the or locality or any particular description of
Constitution. (PSA, RA 11659, Sec. 4) traffic to any prejudice or disadvantage in
any respect whatsoever; or
Under Section 17 of Article XII of the 1987
Constitution, the State may in times of national adopt, maintain, or enforce any regulation,
emergency, when the public interest so requires, practice or measurement which shall be
during the emergency and under reasonable terms found or determined by the Commission to
prescribed by it, temporarily take over or direct the be unjust, unreasonable, unduly
operation of any privately-owned public utility or preferential or unjustly discriminatory, in a
business affected with public interest. (Sec. 17, final order which shall be conclusive and
Article XII, 1987 Constitution) shall take effect in accordance with the
PSA, upon appeal or otherwise. (PSA, CA
Under Section 18 of Article XII of the 1987 146 as amended, Sec. 19)
Constitution, the State may, in the interest of
national welfare or defense, establish and operate 3. To refuse or neglect, when requested by
vital industries and, upon payment of just the Postmaster General or his authorized
compensation, transfer to public ownership utilities representative, to Carry public mail on the
and other private enterprises to be operated by the regular trips of any public land
Government. (Sec. 18, Article XII, 1987 transportation service maintained or
Constitution) operated by any such public service . (PSA,
RA 11659, Sec. 19)
NOTE: Nationality requirements shall not be
imposed by the relevant Administrative Agencies on 4. To refuse or neglect, when requested by
any public service not classified as a public utility. the Administrative Agency to Urgently use,
(PSA, RA 11659, Sec. 4) deliver or render the public service for the
purpose of avoiding further loss on human,
NOTE: The NEDA shall provide periodic advice to material, economic, or environment during
Administrative Agencies on the proper application of a state of calamity. (PSA, RA 11659, Sec.
the constitutional and other legal restrictions to local 19)
and foreign-owned subcontractors, without putting
CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE