Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reading FORUM
Reading FORUM
Back to our discussion, as a human right activist, I would say that the curfew on teenagers are not
necessary.
Why? Because first and foremost, putting curfew on teenagers clearly violates the human rights
There is a declaration, Universal Declaration of Human Rights that was proclaimed by United Nations
General Assembly back in the year 1948 and UN states that this declaration is a common standard
achievement for all people and all nation.
In this declaration, at least 10 of the 30 articles stated can be viewed as not supporting the curfews
implied on teenage.
As I mentioned my first point earlier, curfew on teenagers violates the human right.
Putting curfews such as teenage under the age of 18 cannot be at certain places
after 10 p.m. clearly violates the human rights. These teenagers do not have the
freedom to go to places they wanted to.
Meanwhile in Article 21 - everyone has the right to take part in the government of
his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives
Some of the curfews that did not allow teenagers to take part in any political association or activities
once again can be seen as violating the human right.
Teenagers should be allowed to join such activities because it will improve their self confidence and
exp as they are the future leaders