Sticem lleri Yop: Teknolojileri AMANAT BAGHDAD -Mohammed al Qasem Rehabiliation Project CONSTRUCTION CHEMICALS TEST REPORT Report No/Date: 468R01/17.08.2018 Burak YORULMAZ Fatih GULER Civil Engineer, MSe Geology Engineer PhD Candidate ‘TICEM Hleri Yap1 Tekno i Ticaret Damismanhk Lid. Sti. Adres: Istanbul Teknik Universitesi Ayazaiia Kampiisi Resitpaga Mah. Katar Cad, Teknokent Art 1 Sit. No: 2/5/17 Sanyer / Istanbul ‘wwwsicem.com.e Tel: 0 212 276 5 276 info@ticem.com.tr Fax: 0212 276 6265TICEM Labs AMANAT BAGHDAD -Mohammed al Qasem Rehabiliation Project ‘Tests were carried out on the specimens which is taken by Bureauv is Company that sent our laboratory. Details of tests are given in Table I. Test results are given in this report. Product ‘Test Method Test Sika MonoTop 612 _ = EN 1504-3 Compressive Strength 88 6319 ‘Compressive Strength Sikadur 52 7 C882 ‘Adhesion to Coneree 7 ASTM Dl0s4 __ Viscosity 1695-5 Compressive Strength EN ISO 178 Flexural Strength Sikadur 32 1S0 527 Tensile Sirength To ISOS27 Elongation at Break EN 1S0 4624, EN 1543, ENT2188 Tensile Adhesion Strength 5 180 527 Tensile Strength Sipaes0 EN ISO 4624 Tensile Adhesion Strength_| Sika Ferrogard 901 ASTM DI475 Density ISO 10618, Tensile Strength Sika Wrap 300C 1SO 10618, Tensile Modulus BeCHEHee 1SO 10618, Elongation at Break SikaTop Armatee-110 | CAN A23.2-68 Bond Strength EN 12190 Compressive Strength kagard 720 Epocem EN 1542 Tensile Adhesion Stengih 695-5 Compressive Strength are Etag 001 Pull Out 468R01/17.08,2018ika Monotop 612 Compressive sirength test was carried out on Sika Monotop 612 specimen. Test results are given below. Specimen photo is given in Figure 1. Figure 1. Sika Monotop 612 specimen 1.1.Compressive Strength Determination of the compressive strength test was carried out according to EN 12190 which is stated in EN 1504-3 Table 3. The test specimen was loaded gradually and without shock at a constant rate corresponding to a stress increase of (0,1 + 0,05) MPa per second until failure of the test specimen occurs. The maximum load carried by the test specimens were recorded. Test ‘was carried out on 1 day aged and 28 days aged specimens. Test results are given Table 2. Specimen photo is given in Figure 1 Table 2. Sika Monotop 612 compressive strength test results ot Compressive Compressive Strengtt eee Strength (MPa) I day (MPa) 28 days i 33.50 O55 He cy 25.81 721 26,12 71,68 ‘Average 25s 70,81 468R01/17.08,2018,TICEM Labs 2. Sikadur 52 Compressive strength, adhesion to concrete and -osity tests were carried out on Sikadur 52 specimen. Test results are given below. Specimen photo is given in Figure 2. 7 be Figure 2. adur 52 spe 2.1.Compressive Strength Determination of the compressive strength test was carried out according to BS 6319. The test specimen was loaded gradually and without shock at a constant rate corresponding to a stress increase of (45) MPa per minute until failure of the test specimen occurs. The maximum load ca ied by the test specimens were recorded, ‘Test was carried out on 7 days aged sj ‘Test results are given below in Table 3, Table 3. Sikadur 52 compressive strength test results Specimen | Compressive ia Strength (MPa) at 512 2 53.8 3 543 Average 531 JLTICEM Labs 2.2. Adhesion To Concrete Adhesion to concrete test is carri out according to ASTM C882. The test specimen was loaded according to the ASTM C39 until failure of the test specimen occurs. ‘The maximum load imens. carried by the test specimens were recorded. Test was carried out on 7 days aged sp ‘Test results are given below in Table 4. Table 4. Sikadur 52 adhesion to concrete test results Specimen “Adhesion e strength (MPa) =} 10,20 2 881 3 9556 at 9,92 5 93 Average 954 *Failure mode is failure in concrete 2.3.Viscosity ‘Viscosity test carried out according to the ASTM D084. Test was conducted on a temperature of 23°C. Test results are given in Table 5. Table 5. Sikadur 52 viscosity test results, Specimen [Viscosity (eps) i 201 a. 201 3 202 Average 201 3. Sikadur 32 i , fa Compressive strength, flexural strength, tensile strength, elongation at break and Adhesion to ‘concrete tests were carried out on \dur 32 specimen, Test results are given below. Specimen BA photo is given in Figure 3.Figure 3. 3.1. Compressive Strength Determination of the compressive strength test was carried out according to D695-5. The test specimen was loaded gradually and without shock at a constant rate corresponding to a deformation increase of 1.3mm per minute until failure of the test specimen oceurs. The maximum load carried by the test specimens were recorded. Test was carried out on 14 days aged specimens which is cured at a temperature of 23°C. Test results are 6 iven below in Table ‘Table 6, Sikadur 32 compressive strength test results Specimen | compressive Ps Strength (MPa) H [2 3 Average | 64,0 3.2.Flexural Strength specimen was loaded gradually and without shock at a constant rate correspond Determination of the flexural strength test was carried out according to ISO 178. The test ig tga 468R01/17.08 20!TICEM Labs deformation inerease of 50 mm per minute until fa m aged specimens which is cured at a temperature of 23° 1. re of the test specimen occurs. The maximum load carried by the t jens were recorded. Test was carried out on 14 days Test results are given below in Table ‘Table 7. Sikadur 2 flexural strength test results Flexural Strength (MPa) 55,8 56.2 ST 363 56,2 Specimen Average 3.3.Tensil Strength and Elongation at Break Determination of the tensile strength and elongation at break tests were carried out according to ISO 527. The test speci jen was loaded gradually and without shock at a constant rate corresponding to a deformation increase of 50 mm per minute until failure of the test specimen ‘occurs. The maximum load carried by the test specimens were recorded. 1 ‘est was carried out ‘on 14 days aged specimens which is cured at a temperature of 23°C. Test results are given below in Table 8. Spedniar| ‘Tensile Strength | Elongation | (MPa) at break (%) 1 “335 1,08 2 35,2 1,05 3 321 1 + 32,7 1,12, 3 346 107 Average 33,6 109 468R01/17.08.2018,TICEM Labs 3.4.Tensile Adhesion Strength ‘Tensile adhesion test was carried out according to the EN ISO 4624 item 8.4.2. st was carried out on 7 and 14 days aged specimens, which is cured at a temperature of 10°C, Test results are given below in Table 9. ‘Table 9, Sikadur 32 tensile adhesion strength test results “Adhesion Strength (MPa) Specimen Tdays 14 days T 3.22 333 2 3.25 3.45 E 3 3.16 321 4 3.22 3.42 fers 3.18 336 | Average 3.21 3,35 *Failure mode is Failure mode is cohesive failure of concrete substrate 4, Sikadur 330 ‘Tensile strength, adhesion to concrete tests were carried out on Sikadur 330 specimen. Test results are given below. Specimen photo is given in Figure 4. Figure 4. Sikadur 330 specimenTICEM Labs 4.1. Tensile Strength Determination of the tensile strength test was carried out according to ISO 527. The test specimen was loaded gradually and without shock at a constant rate corresponding to a deformation increase of 50 mm per minute until failure of the test specimen occurs. The maximum load carried by the test specimens were recorded. Test was carried out on 7 days aged specimens, Test results are given below in Table 10. ‘Table 10. Sikadur 330 tensile strength test results Soesinen [Tn an 313 2 30.1 3 30.6 4 30.7 5 31,2 ‘Average 30,8 4.2.Tensile Adhesion Strength Tensile adhesion test was carried out according to the EN ISO 4624 item 8.4.2. Test was carried out on 7 days aged specimens which is cured at a temperature of 23°C. Test results are given below in Table 11. ‘Table 11. adur 330 tensile adhesion strength test results Specimen ‘Adhesion Strength T 2 3 4 3 Average 4,08. | * Failure mode is cohesive failure of concrete substrate.TICEM Labs 5, Sika Ferrogard 901 Density test was carried out on Sika Ferrogard 901 specimen. Test results are given below. Specimen photo is given in Figure 5. Figure 5. Sika Ferrogard 901 specimen 5.1.Density ‘Tensile adhesion test was carried out according to the ASTM D475. Test was conducted on a temperature of 23°C. Test results are given below in Table 12. ‘Table 12. Sika Ferrogard 901 tensile adhesion strength test results Specimen AverageTICEM Labs 6. Sika Wrap 300C ‘Tensile strength, tensile modulus, elangation at break tests were carried out on Sika Wrap 300C specimen, Test results are given below. Specimen photo is given in Figure 6, Figure 6. Sika Wrap 300C specimen 6.1. Tensile Strength, Tensile Modulus and Elongation at Break Determination of the tensile strength, tensile modulus and elongation at break tests were carried ‘out according to ISO 10618. The maximum load carried by the test specimens were recorded. ‘Test results are given below in Table 13. Table 13. Sika Wrap 300C tensile strength test results Specimen | Tensile Strength | Tensile Modulus Elongation at break | (MPa) __(MPa)___ %)_ i 3985 228432, 1,96 2 4154 _ 3 263 ‘Average 4134 230201 468R01/17.08,2018TICEM Labs 7. Sika Top Armatec-110 Bond strength test was carried out on Sika Top Armatec-110 specimen. Test results are given below. Specimen photo is given in Figure 7. Figure 7. Sika Top Armatec-110 specimen 7.1.Bond Strength (on steel substrate) Bond strength test was carried out according to the CAN A23.2-6B. Test was carried out on steel substrate, 7 days aged specimens which is cured at a temperature of 23°C. Test results are given below in Table 14. ‘Table 14. Sika Top Armatec-1 10 bond strength test results Bond Specimen | Strength (MPa) i 1.63 2 122 3 157 4 178 3 1,63 Average 1,87 7.08.2018,TICEM Labs 8. Sikagard 720 Epocem Compressive strength, adhesion to conerete tests were carried out on Sikagard 720 Epocem specimen. Test results are given below. Specimen photo is given in Figure & Figure 8. Sikagard 720 Epocem specimen 8.1. Compressive Strength Determination of the compressive strength test was carried out according to EN 12190. The test spet increase of (0,1 + 0,05) MPa per second until failure of the test specimen occurs. The maximum yen was loaded gradually and without shock at a constant rate corresponding to a stress load carried by the test specimens were recorded, Test was carried out on 7 days aged which is cured at a temperature of 23°C. Test results are given below in Table 15. Table 15, Sikagard 720 Epocem compressive strength test results ‘Compressive Specimen | Strength (MPa) 46,2 45,9 458 Average 46,0 168RO1/17.08.2018TICEM Labs 8.2. Tensile Adhesion Strength ‘Tensile adhesion test was carried out according to the EN 1542. Test was carried out on 7 days aged specimens which is cured at a temperature of 23°C. Test results are given below in Table 16. Table 16. Sikagard 720 Epocem tensile adhesion strength test results ‘Adhesion Strength (MPa) 2.75 2.61 3.10 2.85 2.51 ‘Average 2.76 * Failure mode is cohesion failure in the concrete substrate. Specimen cr] [es]ro] 9, Sika Anchorfix 3+ Compressive strength, pull out tests were carried out on Sika Anchorfix 3+ specimen. Test results are given below. Specimen photo is given in Figure 9. Figure 9. Sika Anchorfix 3+ specimen 9.1. Compressive Strength Determination of the compressive strength test was carried out according to D695-5. The test specimen was loaded gradually and without shock at a constant rate corresponding a ATICEM Labs deformation inerease of 1.3mm pet minute until failure of the test specimen occurs. The maximum load carried by the test specimens were recorded. Test was carried out on 7 days aged specimens, Test results are given below in Table 17. Table 17. Sika Anchorfix 3+ compressive strength test results or Compressive Specimen | strength (MPa) 1 [172 2 116.2 3 1159 ‘Average 16 9.2.Pull Out Pull out test was carried out according to ETAG 001. @ 12 BSOOB steel used for pull out testing. Drill hole has a diameter 22mm and has a depth 120mm. ‘Test Specimen loaded until failure occurs, Test was carried out on 7 days aged specimens. Test results are given below in Table 18, Table 18, Sika Anchorfix 3+ pull out test results Specim Pull Out Strength (MPa) i 12 2 TIAL 3 713 [Average | 712 “Failufe mode is steel rebar ruptured. Fatih GULER Geology Engineer 468R01/17.08,2018TICEM Labs Annex. Pictures Figure A2. Tensile strength test according to the ISO 10618, 468R01/17.08.2018