Many scientists believe that now we can study the behavior of a three-yearold child to see whether they

will grow up to be criminals. To what extent do you think crime is determined by human nature？ Is it
possible to stop children from growing up to be criminals?

It has been outstandingly enchanting to see the progress made in portions of science. However, despite
many of these believers being skeptical on their outcome, it is strongly disagreed that determination via
analyzing toddlers' attitudes can lead to any conclusion of the fact that individuals become criminals.
Although many abstract details of characteristic studies may be carried out to determine social
behavioral benefits, it surely cannot elucidate criminal activities as a certain fact in the future.

Needless to say, although science has the upper hand in any discussion among all other facilities
humankind possesses, the fact that crime can be predicted by studying the behavior of a three-year-old
child is utterly declined. To reason this statement, what is mentionable is that some people misuse the
information given by scientists to make up rejected facts and conclusions so-called pseudoscience
achievements. These achievements, hence, are based on beliefs only according to assumptions and in
worst cases pre-assumptions that were partially derived from preceding facts. Scientifically rejected
assumptions are yet to be obtained by many people in different societies either by giving in-depth online
research or more gullibly by only verbal communication. Regarding the aforementioned definition of
pseudoscience opposed by true science, it is impossible as a fact to predict the future. Therefore, the
claimed statement is considered to be a fallacy. However, researchers may have found particular
reasons for obtaining the root causes of criminals in the past, nonetheless, no certain behavior can lead
to a solid determination of the future. Mr. Dhamer for this example is an understandable scenario in
which researchers have found psychological roots for his multiple homicides which were certainly
terrifying. However, it is not enough to state that these studies are reliable.

On the other hand, with unreliable