Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1|Page
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2|Page
ABSTRACT
The Code of Criminal Procedure has been amended time and again to suit the time and
changes in the society. This paper deals with the major amendments India has seen in its
Code of Criminal Procedure while delving into the newly introduced bill in the parliament i.e.
the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Bill. To make things simpler, each major
amendment has been dealt with date wise, old to new and in precise points. The criminal
procedure code is nothing but a consolidation of the law relating to criminal procedure. The
Code of Criminal Procedure we know today was enacted on 25 th January 1974 and it came
into force on 1st April 1974. So was there no way deal with the criminals before Code of
Criminal Procedure 1973? The concise form of this paper attempts to bring the study of
changes made to the Code of Criminal Procedure since the 19 th century, under one roof,
thereby making it easier to understand the development of Criminal Procedure Code to the
21st century.
3|Page
HISTORY OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PRE-INDEPENDENCE.
The code of criminal procedure determines the way in which the police, prosecutors,
magistrates or judges are bound to act during the investigation and trial of a criminal case.
The purpose of a consolidated code of criminal procedure is to aid and assist administration
of criminal justice.
The code can be traced back to the 19 th century in India. What encouraged the formulation of
such a code is the uprising of 1857. It wasn’t exactly in a consolidated form. It was a series of
criminal law reforms undertaken by the British in the wake of 1857 rebellion.1
Thus, in 1861 the first CrPC known to Indians was intended to oppress the rebellious natives.
This was evident since this code offered immunity to the British from trial before district
courts and the British could only be tried by the High Courts.
The next version of CrPC was enacted in 1872 made it possible for a magistrate to try a
British subject if he himself was one.
What was a significant development in the history of codification of criminal law, was the
CrPC enacted in the 1882. It empowered the Indian Magistrates to exercise jurisdiction over
the British even if it was limited to presidency towns.
In 1898, the code contained reformative provisions to make the law relating to criminal
procedure uniform. This code of 1898 was carried on in India after independence as well until
the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 was enacted. The main amendments to the code of
1898 were brought about in the years 1923 and 1955.
1923 amendment amended Sections 364, 388, 562, Schedule 5 Form XXXVIIA and repealed
sections 98 and 104. It provided a substitute for the provision contained in section 388 which
dealt with suspension of execution of sentence of imprisonment and added a sub-section to
Section 562 related to conviction and release with admonition.2
The Amendment of 1955 was extensive. 3 It intended to simplify procedures and speed up
trials. Apart from these amendments, the provisions of 1898 code remained majorly
unchanged till Central Law Commission was set up in 1955.
4|Page
As discussed earlier, the Central Law Commission was set up in 1955. The first Law
Commission presented its 14th report on the reform of judicial administration in 1958. It was
not concerned with detailed scrutiny of the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure but
it made some recommendations in regard to the law of criminal procedure, some which
required amendment to the Code.
A systematic examination of the Code was subsequently undertaken by the Law Commission
for giving concrete form to the recommendations made in the 14 th report and with the object
of attempting a general revision. The main task of the Commission was to suggest measures
to remove anomalies and ambiguities brought to light by conflicting decisions of the High
Courts or to consider local variations with a view to securing and maintaining uniformity to
consolidate laws wherever possible and to suggest improvements where necessary.
Suggestions for improvements received from various sources were considered by the
Commission.
A comprehensive report for the revision of the Code, namely, the 41 st report was presented by
the Law Commission in September 1969. This report took into consideration the
recommendations made in the earlier reports of the Commission dealing with specific
matters, namely, the 14th, 25th, 32nd, 33rd, 36th, 37th, 40th reports.4
4
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
5
ibid
5|Page
4. To ensure the presence of any person concerned with the case through warrant,
summons, etc.6
5. To aid and assist in administration of criminal justice and working of various
functionaries.7
6|Page
This Act aimed to repeal certain enactments and to amend other enactments. The Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 was amended by this Act. And The Criminal Law Amendment
(Amending) Act, 1966, sections 2 and 3 were repealed.8
8
Repealing and Amending Act, 1974
9
Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1978
10
Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1980
7|Page
Because of the Mathura Custodial Rape case11, sections to prevent such abuse were brought
in. It amended Section 327 and the first schedule. It inserted that inquiry and trial of rape or
an offence u/s 376, 376A, 376B, 376C or 376D of IPC shall be conducted in camera and a
person could be allowed to be in the room or building only on an application made to the
presiding judge if thinks it fit. Printing or publishing matter related to such proceedings
without the permission of court was made unlawful.12
8|Page
Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1991
An ordinance was promulgated to amend Section 197 of the Code which deals with the
cognizance of an offence committed by a public servant including judge or magistrate. 16
16
Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1991
17
Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1993
18
Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1993
19
Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2001
20
Changes made in Code of Criminal Procedure through 2005 & 2008 Amendment Act: A study, Leepakshi
Rajpal, Impact Journal
21
Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment Act), 2005
9|Page
- Section 53 A introduced examination of a person accused of rape by medical
practitioner. Examination included DNA profiling. Section 54 (2) requires the medical
practitioner to furnish the report of such examination to the accused.
Insertion/Amendment of the following sections:
- Section 50 A: Every police officer or other person making an arrest under this code
shall forthwith give the information regarding such arrest and place where the
arrested person is held to any of his friends, relatives or such persons as may be
disclosed or nominated by the arrested person for the purpose of giving such
information.
- Sec 144A: Power to prohibit carrying arms in possession or mass drill or mass
training with arms.
- Sec 164A: Medical examination of the victim of rape by a registered medical
practitioner employed in a hospital run by government or local authority.
- Sec 291A: Identification report of Magistrate w.r.t. to a person or property may be
used as evidence in an inquiry, trial or other proceeding but the magistrate is not
called as a witness.
- Sec 311A: Power of Magistrate to order a person to give specimen signatures or
handwriting
- Sec 436A: Maximum period for which as under trial prisoner can be detained
- Sec 441A: Declaration by sureties
- Increase of fines across many sections
22
Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2005
23
Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Amending Act, 2006
10 | P a g e
This amendment focuses on the rights of the prisoners and compensatory jurisprudence. It
introduced Sections 41 A to 41 D relating to notice of appearance before the police officer. It
also introduced recording of statements/confessions in audio-video electronic manner via
proviso under sections 161, 164 and 275 CrPC. Very importantly, Sec 357A CrPC introduced
Victim Compensation Scheme. Sec 195A CrPC inserted the procedure for witnesses in case
of threatening etc. A witness of any other person may file a complaint in relation to an
offence under section 195A of Indian Penal Code.24
24
Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2008
25
Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2010
26
Mukesh & anr. Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) & ors, (2017) 6 SCC 1
27
Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013
11 | P a g e
- The law also punishes the police (according to this amendment Section 197, no
sanction is required to prosecute the police) and the hospital authorities with the
imprisonment of up to two years if they fail to register a complaint or treat a victim.
28
State of Jammu and Kashmir & Ors. vs. Shubam Sangra, (2019) 10 J&K CK 0016
29
Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2018
30
New IPC, CrPC Bill: is India’s planned criminal law reform a game-changer? By Soutik Biswas, India
Correspondent, BBC
12 | P a g e
CONCLUSION
The law dealing with crime has changed frequently. But somehow, the criminals manage to
stay steps ahead of us. Amendments to the criminal procedure code need cancel out the gaps
and lacunae that must be covered. The procedure has to efficient and at the same time
humane. It has to strict and yet empathetic wherever needed. A crime affects not only one
individual but people at large and despite the best efforts put in modernizing the law, the
crime rate is ever increasing. The Crime in India Statistics Volume III by the National Crime
Records Bureau shows the trend of crime rate in India from 1981 to 2021. As the population
increases, the crime rate increases as well. Will the new CrPC be efficient in ways that the
Code of 1973 wasn’t? Or will things remain unchanged? Only time can tell.
References:
13 | P a g e
22. Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization Act, 2019
23. CrPC was enacted after the 1857 mutiny, Times of India, May 5, 2008
24. Changes made in Code of Criminal Procedure through 2005 & 2008 Amendment Act: A
study, Leepakshi Rajpal, Impact Journal
25. New IPC, CrPC Bill: is India’s planned criminal law reform a game-changer? By Soutik
Biswas, India Correspondent, BBC
26. The Crime in India Statistics Volume III by the National Crime Records Bureau, 2021
14 | P a g e