Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Objective-Based Reward System

    Uploaded by

    bianca
    6 views9 pages

    Original Title

    Objective-based Reward System

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views9 pages

    Objective-Based Reward System

    Uploaded by

    bianca

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 9
    1910312024, 15:49 ‘Game Studies - Towards a Model of Objectve-Based Reward Systems the international journal of volume 21 issue 1 computer game research May 2021, ISSN:1604.7982 home ‘about archive RSS Cc Agata Waszkiewicz Agata Waszkiewicz is 3 (game scholar at Maria Curie-Sklodowska University in Lublin, Poland. Their research Interests include experimental digital ‘games, queer Fepreséntation in video games, and the ways In Which games alow for exploration of one's Identity. Agata is currently working on a book "Delicious Pixels Food in Video Games” (forthcoming 2022) Contact information agata.anna.waszkiewiez at gmal.com Mateusz Kominiarceuk Mateusz Kominiarc2uk, MA's game scholar with literary background and particular interest in composite ludic artifacts, including game odes and nested ‘games. Currently Unaffiliated Contact information mateuse at Kominiarezuk.com Towards a Model of Objective-Based Reward Systems by Agata Waszkiewicz, Mateuse Kominiarczuk Abstract In this paper, two commonly contrasted categories of game objectives are juxtaposed: achievements (otherwise known as trophies, medals ‘or badges) and quests (or missions). Recognizing that previous research percelved them as separate and rather broadly understood ‘concepts, the paper follows Mikael Jakobsson (2011) in acknowledging the similarities and overlaps between quests and achievements, wich are redefined as umbrella terms describing a range of tasks sharing ‘an objective and a reward. These “objective-based reward systems,” Understood additionally as frames for the play experiences, are discussed in relation to their associated level of meaning (Fine, 2983) ‘and attainabilty (Juul, 2023). Finally, the results are presented in a ‘generalizes theoretical model for further study of various objective- based reward systems, going beyond just quests and achievements proper. Keywords: Achievements, quests, objective-based reward systems, freme analysis, goals, rewards Introduction ‘Among the substantial body of work on game reward systems, the majority seems to focus on two types: quests (Tosca, 2003; Aarse 2003, 2005; Walker et al, 2007, Rettberg, 2008; Howard, 2008; Karslen 2008) and achievements (Montola et al, 2009; Wang anc Sun, 2011, Huotari and Hamari, 2017). The common practice in both scholarly work and in the popular nomenclature is to perceive them as structurally different by emphasizing their functional and aesthetic dissimilarities. However, these tend to vary between game systems {and terminologies preferred by individual scholars, leading to the blurring ofthe lines between the two concepts, It can be argued that the confusion caused by the overlapping ‘meanings of both categories came from the fact that both terms were ‘established by Industry professionals, and that they then shift through their use in game studies’ analyses. Recognizing the need for more precise definitions in the academic research, we propose to categorize ‘various types of reward-based goals not in regard to their position vis~ ‘vis the game's narrative, but according to their in-game structure ‘and meaning. In order to do so, we map the types of objectives often denoted by the concepts of “quests” and “achievements” according to ‘wo main theoretical frameworks: Alan Fine's frame analysis (1983) ‘and Jesper Juul typology of attainabllty and goal types (2013) Furthermore, we argue that this new way of conceptualizing the “objective-based reward systems," as we refer to them here, might ‘draw research attention to the different ways in which players use various rewarc systems in the process of meaning-making. Secondly, the proposed madel can be considered a more precise tool of «discussing ways in which the players use these systems as framing devices for thelr experiences. Quests and achievements: differences and similarities hitpssigamestucies.org/2101/arcles/waszkiowicz_kominiarczuk 9 1910312024, 15:49 ‘Game Studies - Towards a Model of Objectve-Based Reward Systems Due to the prevalence and popularity of videogame genres that rely fon quests and the commen use of the term, it seems that “quests” rarely need to be defined between side and main quests, and transfer that knowledge between players quickly learn to differentiate titles when understanding what type of task is associated with a type of reward. However, this generalization can lead te misconceptions, about the homogeneity of the term, creating in turn a false ‘assumption that all quests are ontologically similar while, in fact, they can differ rather substantially in their structure and the type of rewards they offer. While the majority of videogame definitions conceptualize them as goal systems (Stenres 2017, Zagal et al 2019), this leads to an idea that the term “quests” denotes @ homogenous group, a claim that seems problematic even if ane takes into consideration the most basic distinction between main quests and side quests. ‘The majority of exsting Iterature maintains a firm separation betiveen “internal” quests and other objective-based reward systems, such as broadly understood “achievernents" (as they are knowin of Xbox Live, Steam, Origin and Google Play), "trophies" (PlayStation Network), otherwise known as “medals” (Newgrounds), "badges" (Steam, Kongregate), as well as “triumphs” or “challenges” (other ‘game titles or platforms). Regardless of the name, such systems are commonly understood in terms of glory rewards bound to player ‘accounts (Wang and Sun, 2011) and thus “external” to the gameworld without direct effect on character's in-game actions. The 2010s saw the rise in papulari ‘hich in turn encouraged their implementation on various platforms ity of games based on this type of reward systems, land the appearance of games with gameplay strictly facused on collecting achievements (e.g. My Name is Mayo (Green Lava Studios, 2016], a clicker game with 51 trophies on PlayStation). Different ways in which they are introduced, however, challenge the notion of achievement’ “external.” For Mikael Jakobsson “an achievement actually consists of a task, a task description and a reward, just lke a quest in World of Warcraft (2011), white for others itis 2 goal the fulfilment of which “is stored outside the scope of individual game sessions” (Bjork, 2010 (Harari ‘and Eranti, 2011)). Although the latter definition conceptualizes achievements, unlike quests, as extrinsic systems, Juno Harari and \eikko Eranti caution against perceiving them as optional or secondary (Montola et al., 2009), as it diminishes the efforts of those players whase primary play style focuses on collecting ther. Thus, by saying that they "should be viewed as games oftheir own” (Hamari ‘and Eranti, 2011, p. 3) the researchers agree with Jakobsson who notices the similarity between the achievements and the in-game quests, comparing the achievements to “an invisible MMO that all Xbox Live members participate in, whether they lke it or not” (2011) That similarity between achievements and quests is an important, albeit not obvious, realisation which allows Jakobsson ta move the reference point from the singular title to the entire system, further revealing the external-internal division to be superficial and inaccurate. ‘The new model of objective-based reward systems We consider frame analysis (Goffman, 1974) a useful tool of bridging this gap in understanding, especially since it was not yet exhaustively utilized in the context of rewards systems. Although it has proven a popular theory among game scholars, as nated by Sebastian Deterding (2013), games studies mostly know this madel through a different, secondary source, that is Gary Alan Fine's Shared Fantasy (1983) (cf Deterding, 2013, p. 13 and p. 25-26) -- perhaps due to Its clarity and simplicity (especially relative to Gotfman's notoriously complex writing). Far his ethnographic study of nascent role-playing ‘games and the subculture of people who played them, Fine propased 2 simplified model consisting of "three levels of meaning”: 1. the "primary framework of *real world” and "people"; 2. The "game context” of “rules” enacted by the "players"; 5, tne "gaming world” in which *characters” operate (p. 186). hitpssigamestucies.org/2101/arcles/waszkiowicz_kominiarczuk 219 1910312024, 15:49 ‘Game Studies - Towards a Model of Objectve-Based Reward Systems Fine’s framework has been adopted for the conceptualization of net Just tabletop fantasy role plays of Dungeons & Dragons’ type, but also larps and videogames (cf. e.g. Mackay, 2001; Waskul and Lust, 2008; Linderoth, 2012). In such works itis common to denote the level of the "gaming world” as "diagetic.” However, following Kristine Jergensen's (2013) criticism of the use of the latter term in game studies, as well as her own reinterpretation of Fine's model, we instead recognize this last “level of meaning” simply as “fictional.” It could be argued that basing the argumentation on Fine's interpretation of frame analysis one risks facing criticism, such as the ‘one already levied by Deteraing (2013, p. 32, |.a.) against prior misreading and oversimplification of this theory. Even so, this specific theory of "three levels of meaning” with its well-known rendering is the best suited for the general, synthetic model presented in the paper, allowing far the discussion of various objective-based reward systems and their influence on the players. In doing so, in order not to misrepresent Fine's "levels" as definite "frames", we reference Deterding’s insight on the motivational relevance of frames proper (p. (60-61), considering it as the mast important theme to the eriginal work presented in the paper. Ta better understand the nuances of what we refer to as objective- based reward systems, we combine Fine's framework with Jesper uul's study of game objectives, in which he recognizes three main types of goals: 1, completable (one-time goals); 2! transient (repeatable); 3. based on Improvement (each success also raises the bar for the next attempt) (2013, p. 85-86). 3uul notes that some aims are set by the players themselves and elsewhere briefs on the Importance of the context in which they are realized, devoting particular attention to the case of fiction, These remarks may be further refined in combination with Jorgensen’s revisions of Fine’s model in order to consider gals in terms of thelr relation to the game (whether they are social, ludic or perhaps even belong within the gameworld itself), how are they are attained (whether they are supposed to be achieved once or repeatedly) and, finaly, the rewards they carry (Wang and Sun, 2011), In the end, individual game reward systems are considered quests land achievements among them -- as a basis for specific frames in the GGoffmanian sense, either exo- or autotelic (Deterding, 2013, following CCsikszentminalyi, 1990) in terms of their motivational relevance. Typology of objective-based reward systems In the following section, we discuss each of the nine types of objectives created by intersecting Fine's three levels of meaning (fretional, game, and social) with Juul's three types of goals (completable, transient, and improvement-based). The nine categories that are created as a result include three types of completable tasks (completable-fictional, completable-game, completable-sacal), three types of transient tasks (cransient-fictional,transient-game, transient- social), and three types of improvement-based tasks (improvement- fictional, improveent-game, and improverent-social) It is crucial to acknowledge that these categories are not mutually ‘exclusive, Many objective-based reward systems include components that could fall into more than one category. Others may coexist closely land influence each other, which complicates the formal distinctions between categories. Even s0, we believe that by mapping out various in-game reward-ased tasks in such a way, we facilitate the further discussion on the ludic structures of game systems. By creating more precise definitions, we aim to show the complexity of in-game structures used for player motivation; which allows for further distinction between the ways individual types of tasks influence various players. In the future, such research could be useful both for development of games and gamified applications as well as further research on player styles and motivations. 1, Completable tasks hitpssigamestucies.org/2101/arcles/waszkiowicz_kominiarczuk 319 1910312024, 15:49 ‘Game Studies - Towards a Model of Objectve-Based Reward Systems For Juul, completable goals “can be completed once and forall. Once we begin playing, we become someone who has-not-completed-the- ‘game-yet. Once we complete the game, we will always be someone Who has completed [the game]" (2013, p. 85). Due to this quality, they are mast often encountered in single-player Games and ‘campaigns allowing the binary understanding of a goal/task as finished or unfinished. 4.1, com Many examples of completable-fictional goals are found among main and side quests of RPG, massive multiplayer or action-adventure ‘genres, Thus, they can be often found in those games that both rely heavily on narrative and have a quest-based gameplay, referred to by Tomasz Majkowski as *novel-games” (2019). Their embedding in narrative justifies the completable character of goals as, for example, finishing one of the narrative main quests pushes the plat forward and ‘opens further narrative paths. Often, the reward for such a goal is ‘greater than in the case of the repeatable goals (cf. transient-fictional {goals) and is either meaningful in the course of the narration (e.g. iter required in the next quest lines) or is unattainable by other ‘An example of this can be found in the PlayStation 4 game Marvel's ‘Spider-Man (Insomniac Games, 2018) in the side quest which introduces Black Cat ~~ a character who, after initaly being featured {5 an NPC, was later clven her own DLC. In order to locate her hideout, the player, as Spider-Man, needs to first locate al the stakeout positions, which are marked on the map with the quest specific marker, and then find her main base. Athough Black Cat is not showin in the main campaign, as Spider-Man finds an already abandoned hideout, he is rewarded for the effort with a unique black suit, which is not only wearable during the game (i.e. has an aesthetic value), but is required in order to obtain a trophy titled "A Suit for All Seasons" given after completing the suit collection (a completable- ‘game goal) 1.2, Completable-came. ‘The completable-game goals, while sharing the condition of being available to the player only once, are located at the structural level of the came. That means that their reason does not stem from the narrative, but are arbitrary goals set by developers, most often in the form of achieverent-type goals. The fact that they are bound to a player or avatar account on a platform means that they are also necessarily completable ~~ obtaining an achievement is possible once for each game on a specific player account. Furthermore, thelr external placement can set them as parallel to the ‘goals from the completable-fictlonal category, like the aforementioned Black Cat quest. By completing it, the player unlocks a corresponding trophy named "Cat Prints.” Like all the PlayStation Network trophies, it lacks in-game awards and can only be viewed outside the game (making Ita “glory” reward), through a PlayStation menu. Especially the latter is an indicator that it belongs to the game dimension -- although it accompanies an event embedded in the narrative, itis a part of an external reward system. This means that Its aesthetic and function are dictated by the system rules rather than the individual rules of the specific game title. This category is particularly interesting because of its meaning making potential -- on the one hang, players are known to adjust their play strategies to the personal meta-goals (e.9. playing ‘according to online walkthroughs in order to collect all achievements), while on the other, by setting contradictory achievements, developers ‘an encourage multiple playthroughs or even dark or transgressive play. The latter could be achieved by rewarding disruptive or morally ‘ambiguous behaviour. An example of this can be found in Assassin's Creed: Syndicate (Ubisoft Quebec, 2015) where the players unlock an ‘achievement "WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU" for deralling five vehicles by shooting and killing their horses, an act thet players otherwise might not do intentionally hitpssigamestucies.org/2101/arcles/waszkiowicz_kominiarczuk 49 1910312024, 15:49 ‘Game Studies - Towards a Model of Objectve-Based Reward Systems ‘This type of achievement shows the lack of clear boundaries between the categories and their mutual influences on each other. It seems important to highlight that the achievernent’s narne itself calls out the player's "bad" behaviour. Paradoxically so, considering that its the presence of the achievernent that potentially encourages that behaviour; especially in players who strive for full completion of ‘games and who use the achievement lsts as guidelines for play. The meta game humour of the achieverent's name acts as an adcitional incentive to camplete it, or ean come as an amusing surprise to an unsuspecting player, anc thus serves as 2 specific reward. However, it ‘could also deter players wha tend to choose “good!” or “pacifist” (az much as the game allows it) behaviours. With this particular ‘achievement, the game developers are judging the player for ther in- ‘game actions, as are all thelr friends who see the achievement. Although this example may not constitute an active engagement with real people, its undertaken in public and in a multi-layered, psycho- social context. However, in the proposed terminology, itis still better described through the "game" dimension due to its placernent in the ‘game's structure by the developers and the way it can potentially influence the player's activity 4.3. completable-Sociat All social objectives relate to the level of real world and real people, thus they tend to require an activity reaching beyond the sinole-player and ficvonal experience, Thus, they mostly can be foun in multiplayer and online games, as well as some gamified applications, This grou includes one-time tasks which require social interaction such as inviting a friend to the game or engaging with them in the way spectied by the game rules. Duolingo (Luis von Ahn, 2011), a gamified app for learning languages, includes a leaderboard and offers seven achievements, each with three levels. These are placed inside the application rather than any extrinsic profile, and they do not offer any additional rewards. The three Uers of achievernent titled "Friencly" are as follows: “follow three friends," “be followed by 3 frends" ang “invite a frend to Duclingo.” Due to the differences and lack of linearity, each of them cean be treated as a completable goal rather than one that is improvement-based, A similar goal, "Recruiting friends,” can be found in World of Warcraft (Blizard Entertainment, 2004). It seems to be structured in a way that resembles a quest rather than an achievement, since its ‘completion rewards the player with @ glory prize in the form of a title ‘that can appear in front of the avatar’s name, serving solely an esthetic function, However, after a certain amount of time befriending another person, the player gains additional in-game items, including @ rare mount, which impacts the gameplay in 2 meaningful way. Both these cases seem to imply a strong association between completable-social goals anc glory rewards. 2, Transient ‘As opposed to the previous category, transient tasks allow players to complete the specific goal mare than once, each time gaining a new ‘and sometimes different or randomized rewaré. For example, many online multiplayer games require their players to repeatedly perform @ number of similar actions in order to gain a sufficient amount of ‘experience points needed to level up and, thus, progress in the game ~- practice commonly referred to as “grinding” (King et al, 2013). In its most straightforward meaning, forthe transient goals to be considered Fictional, they need to be given a meaning that embeds them in the game's story. For example, both World of Warcraft and Diablo franchises introduce the mechanic of daily world quests or bounties” in the case of Diablo III (Blizzard Entertainment, 2012). Every day 2 set of narrative quests is randomly generated -- the player can trigger a new distribution by logging out of the game (Diabio IID or simply has to wait for them to change (World of hitpssigamestucies.org/2101/arcles/waszkiowicz_kominiarczuk 59 1910312024, 15:49 ‘Game Studies - Towards a Model of Objectve-Based Reward Systems Warcraft). In WoW each world quest is introduced and concluded by {an appearance of a character from the gameworld. In Diablo III they are instead embedded through Tyrac, interaction with whom is required to obtain a game reward for the completion of a full et of bounties, 1e character of single quest-giver, Translent-fctional tasks are not only repeatable nthe sense that they ‘can be played through dally, but since they belong to a limited number of types, players tend to encounter identical situations and rewards on different days or maps. Their completion is not obligatory and the rewards can be used to gain advantage or progress in the ‘game, Including: items, resources, experience and reputation points, ‘Similar to the completable-game category, the transient-game goals require players to choose a specific game strategy and putin time in order to obtain a reward. Though they differ érastically in genre, both Hearthstone (Blizzard Entertainment, 2014), an online card game, and Heroes of the Storm (Blzzerd Entertainment, 2015), a multiplayer ‘online battle arena, each include daily quests. The way these dally quests structure goals differs substantially from previously discussed cexemples, Whereas on the structural level they appear similar to the transient fictional daly quests, they are not embedded in fiction and influence solely the strategy of play by encouraging specific player choices, €.9 pertaining to the use of specifc card types. (*Mrgrarglir: Play 20 Murlocs”, "Spell Master: Cast 25 spells") or heroes ("Play 2 games as, 2 Starcraft Hero"), awarding players with virtual currency, experience boosts (further encouraging repeated play), or cosmetic rewards [Another type of repetitive tasks also involves Interaction with other players. Rather than adding other players to the friend list ~ which, logically, would positon it as a completable goal -- the player might be requires to spectate a friend's game (e.g. Hearthstone ~- "We {and Learn!: Watch a friend win in spectator mode”) or interact with ‘another human player instead of a computer opponent (e.g. Pokémon {Go-- missions: “Trade a Pokémon” or "Battle Another Trainer”). {An interesting comparison between the game and the social catagories can be noticed among Hearthstone daily quests. Despite sharing the same in-game position and structure, all “social” quests provide diferent, more valuable rewards than the rest (e.g. higher ‘amount of gold or a full card pack as opposet to a single card) 3. Improvement Juul described improvernent goals as being “about our personal and Continuous quest for improvement” (2011, p. 3), which "can by definition never be reacned" (p. 86). He emphasized the Incividual involvement in setting these goals as well as the motivational character of the in-game incentives to continue beating one's own, score, for example in arcade games. As such, the majority of improvement-based goals are either embeced in the ludic aspects of play or involve the social participation. 3.1, Improvement-Fictional The improvement-fctional goals provide an in-world reasoning for improvement, offering the players story-based motivation for their actions. Such close relationship between the story and the improvement-based goals can be found for example in racing Videogames with story campaigns, such as Star Wars Episode I: Racer (Lucasarts, 1999), or -- to a lesser degree -- in certain nested games, ‘e.g. in the Rapids Race minigame found in The Legend of Zelda: Link's ‘Awakening (Grezzo/Nintendo, 2019) 3.2, Improvement-came ‘As a crucial part of many role-playing and multiplayer genres, the levelling systems allow one to manitor their in-game progression, hitpssigamestucies.org/2101/arcles/waszkiowicz_kominiarczuk as 1910312024, 15:49 ‘Game Studies - Towards a Model of Objectve-Based Reward Systems offering the conceatualization of the passage of time. Embedded securely in the game's structure, players do not have influence over the thresholds between separate levels, but can, to a degree, control the speed of the process by choosing specific tasks and structuring the game experience in such a way as to maximize thelr point gain. The Importance of levelling systems for player motivation was recognized by Blizzard Entertainment, who In Diablo II! introduced an ‘additional, account-wide Paragon System offering a possibilty of ‘seemingly ifinite level progression for ever-increasing attributes after ‘exhausting the inital mit of character levels. Diablo III and World of Warcraft both also include other endless (or at least semi-endless) improvement-game type systems in the form of, accordingly, Greater Rifts ané Mythict Dungeons ~~ both serving as important end-game features, A similar function Is performed by the “Battle Towers,” a fiure of the Game Freak’s Pokémon game series ever since Pokémon Crystal for Game Boy Color (2000). 3.3. Improvement-Soe ‘The last category encompasses social scoring systems, usually labelled as scoreboards or leaderboards, which are common in online {and mobile games lke Farmville 2 (2014), Candy Crush Saga (King, 2012) or Frurt Ninja (Halfbrick, 2010). These are characterized by Short levels and immeciate score-based feedback. This category's motivational function involves enhancing and regulating the player's ‘engagement with game tasks, As such, they have become one of the most popular gamification methods employed in other game-based systems, particularly those tied to education or physical activity and fitness, Conclusions ‘The common use of rms "achievements" and “quests” creates an impression that both are homogenous, specifi concepts that substantially

    You might also like