Professional Documents
Culture Documents
UTKARSH PATEL
S8101165
Here is a client named Achariya Chea, she is a citizen of Cambodia. She came to
my office and told me about her immigration history. She came to Australia on
a Class FA Visitor (subclass 600) visa in the Family Sponsored Stream. Her visa
was valid for three months. She is now facing issues with her visa application
and seeks my advice on how to get positive results.
As per sch 1 of the Migration Regulations 1994, Achariya has fulfilled all the
validity criteria (including correct form, visa application charge, and residential
address) stated in sch 1.67 But sch 1 is not the only criterion to satisfy the
validity of her application. To better understand the implications of Condition
8503, we must refer to s 46 of the Migration Act 1958. 8 Under this section, the
1
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) sch 2 cl 600.23.
2
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) sch 2 cl 600.6.
3
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) sch 2 cl 600.611(2).
4
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) sch 8 cl 8503.
5
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) sch 8 cl 8503.
6
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) sch 1 Item 1214C.
7
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) sch 1 Item 1124B.
8
Migration Acts 1958 (Cth) s 46.
s8101165 | UTKARSH PATEL
application for a Partner Class UK/BS Subclass 820/801 visa is deemed invalid if
condition 8503 is attached to the applicant's previous visa which she held while
entering Australia.9 In other words, Achariya is ineligible to make a valid visa
application for this visa due to the presence of Condition 8503 on her current
visa.10
Moreover, s 46(1A)(b) of the Migration Act 1958 stipulates that Achariya has
been subject to Condition 8503 since her last entry into Australia. 11 This means
that the condition has been consistently applied to her visa during her stay in
Australia.12
(b) Is Achariya able to make a valid application for a Medical Treatment Class
UB Subclass602 visa? Below is the answer to this question:
As per sch 1 Item 1214A, Achariya has fulfilled all the criteria listed in the
regulations.15
Achariya completed the form that has been approved and defined by
the minister in a legislative instrument.16
In line with the Migration Regulations of 1994, Achariya also paid the
first payment of her visa application charge at the time of application. 17
Achariya must complete the application in the manner and at the time
and place authorized by the minister in the law.18
Achariya must not be in immigration clearance and the application must
be submitted in or out of Australia.19
9
Migration Acts 1958 (Cth) s 46(1A)(b).
10
Migration Acts 1958 (Cth) s 46(1A)(b).
11
Migration Acts 1958 (Cth) s 46(1A)(b).
12
Migration Acts 1958 (Cth) s 46(1A)(b).
13
Migration Acts 1958 (Cth) s 41(2)(a).
14
Migration Acts 1958 (Cth) s 41(2)(a).
15
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) sch 1 Item 1214A.
16
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) sch 1 Item 1214A(1).
17
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) sch 1 Item 1214A(2).
18
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) sch 1 Item 1214A(3)(a).
19
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) sch 1 Item 1214A(3)(c).
s8101165 | UTKARSH PATEL
Achariya cannot make a valid visa application for a Medical Treatment Class UB
Subclass 602 visa as she first entered Australia on a Class FA Visitor (subclass
600) visa which has condition 8503 mentioned on her visa condition which
states No Further Stay and that has not been waived. 23 Even if she fulfills all the
above-mentioned criteria of sch 1, still she is restricted from making a valid
visa application as per s 46 and s 41(2)(a) of the Migration Acts 1958.
As Achariya has condition 8503 no further stay on her first arrival visa which
was a Class FA Visitor (subclass 600) visa. Due to this condition, she is
restricted from applying for any visa except a protection visa or some
temporary visas.24 As a registered migration agent, I am making this submission
for the waiver of condition 8503 as per reg 2.05(4) 25 and s 41(2A)26 as she
wants to apply for a Medical Treatment Class UB Subclass602 visa.
20
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) sch 1 Item 1214A(3)(e).
21
Department of Home Affairs (Cth), Migration (IMMI 17/030: Subclass 602 (Medical Treatment) Visa –
Approved Form) Instrument 2017
22
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) sch 1 Item 1214A(3B).
23
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) sch 8 cl 8503.
24
Migration Acts 1958 (Cth) s 41(2)(a).
25
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 2.05(4).
26
Migration Acts 1958 (Cth) s 41(2A).
s8101165 | UTKARSH PATEL
Dear Sir/Madam,
RE: VISA CONDITION 8503 – NO FURTHER STAY, WAIVER REQUEST
APPLICANT: Achariya Chea
DATE OF BIRTH:
VISA DETAILS:
PASSPORT DETAILS:
DATE OF ARRIVAL:
As a registered migration agent, I am representing the applicant who intends to
submit a request for the removal of Condition 8503 which is currently attached
to her Class FA Visitor (subclass 600) visa in the Family Sponsored Stream.
I request this waiver on behalf of my client on account of compelling medical
considerations, as she has been informed by a licensed plastic surgeon that she
is presently incapacitated to depart Australia. This request is put forward to
ensure that she can get the additional medical treatment and care that she
requires to recover the movement in her right hand.
Background
I have been advised by Achariya that she arrived in Australia to visit her family
member who sponsored her visa for her Class FA Visitor (subclass 600) visa in
the Family Sponsored Stream. Some days ago, Achariya got an injury on her
four fingers on her right hand whilst working in a chicken factory. She was
severely injured, and her plastic surgeon has advised her not to travel as she
requires further medical treatment and recovery to make sure that she regains
movement in her right hand. This is the reason she wants to apply waiver for
condition 8503 so that she can stay back here and apply for a Medical
Treatment Class UB Subclass 602 visa. So that she can get the best medical
treatment and she can restore her health again.
I respect that Achariya’s Class FA Visitor (subclass 600) visa was granted in the
Family Sponsored Stream and in addition to the 8503 condition, also bears the
8531 condition.
s8101165 | UTKARSH PATEL
Application
I am submitting this application in accordance with Regulation 2.05(4) of the
Migration Regulations 1994, for the following primary reasons: Since the
applicant's (Achariya Chea) Class FA Visitor (subclass 600) visa was granted,
certain compelling and compassionate circumstances emerged over which
Achariya Chea had no control, causing a significant change in her
circumstances.
For subsection 41(2A) of the Act, the circumstances in which the Minister may
waive a condition of a kind described in paragraph 41(2)(a) of the Act are that:
(a) since the person was granted the visa that was subject to the condition,
compelling and compassionate circumstances have developed:
(i) over which the person had no control; and
(ii) that resulted in a major change to the person’s circumstances;
and
(b) if the Minister has previously refused to waive the condition, the Minister is
satisfied that the circumstances mentioned in paragraph (a) are substantially
different from those considered previously; and
(c) if the person asks the Minister to waive the condition, the request is in
writing.
2.05(4) of the Migration Regulation 1994. So that she can stay back in Australia
and apply for a Medical Treatment Class UB Subclass 602 visa for her health to
be recovered by a medical expert.
According to the claim, the most recent changes in the situation reflect
compelling and compassionate circumstances.
PAM3: Div 2.1 reg 2.05 refers to the types of circumstances envisaged. We rely
in particular on the ‘unfitness to travel’ circumstance, which is referred to in
the following extract from the policy:
Unfitness to Travel
Pre-existing medical conditions also might satisfy the requirements for a waiver
under regulation 2.05(4), if the condition has deteriorated to such an extent
that it can be said that the circumstances have developed since the person was
granted the visa, and provided all other regulation 2.05(4) requirements have
been satisfied.
When assessing such claims, officers should consider the medical evidence
provided in support of the claim, such as any evidence provided by a registered
medical practitioner.
I submit that the surgery of Achariya and the complications that have arisen
should she travel, fall within the waiver provisions as outlined in PAM3: Div 2.1
reg 2.05, which refer to the complications associated with the surgery of my
client Achariya. Her surgeon has advised her not to travel at this advanced
stage of surgery as this would not be beneficial to her health condition as she is
restricted from doing any physical movement until she is fully recovered. She
would risk her health and put herself in trouble if she travelled in this
condition.
return to Cambodia as soon as she is fully recovered and fit to travel. For the
same, she is seeking a Medical Temporary Class UB Subclass 602 visa.
Request
Yours faithfully
Agent Name
MARN
s8101165 | UTKARSH PATEL
Bibliography: