stuart Porter, PhD,
tec ad or Goda
Fm Coating Technology
st Ashland specatty
Ingredents, wimington, 06
sporterdastiand com.
TROUBLESHOOTING
Preventing Film
Coating Problems
Through Design
Defects in tablet film coating can be minimized
by effective material and process design
lim coatings on pharmaceutical tablets provide
broad range of functionalities, and the coating
formulation and process are complex, with many
‘tables. Figure 1 snows the variables associated
with a pan-conting process, for example Al ofthese
factors can potentialy influence ential quality
attributes of the final coated product.
Fim-coated products seem to exhibit more than
their fairshare of defects although many fi-coating
problems tend tobe visual or cosmetic defects that may
ot negatively impact product efficacy, their exstence
etracts om the perception of overall product qualty
and may affect consumeripatient confidence, Many
‘common problems with fin-coated products and
processes ae understood and solutions have been
iscussed (1-8), Most ofthese problems can be avoided
ia scienthicaly alié and proactive approach taken
en designing formulations and processes,
‘Generally speaking, the key elements of any ft
coated product are formulation and design a the
core (to which te coating is applied, the coating
formulation, and the coating process. n many cases,
al three of these elements, in combination, play key
ralein the presence or absence of coating detects,
Problems associated with fim-coated products
‘may be classified as:
+ Visual detects
+ Issues associated with product functionality (eg,
rug release behaviour)
+ Concerns with product stability
+ Factors affecting manufacturing costs.
Identitying visual defects (and the extent to wich
they occur can be eltvel simple, and there are
proactive approaches to avoiding them, Product
functionality and stability, However, presenta more
complex situation, because the exstence of the
problem is typical not apparent unt after the
coating pracess has been concluded, and sample
selection for testing Purposes often effectively
precludes assessing the magnitude ofthe problem,
Preventing problems is better than troubleshooting
aterwards, Because regulatory issues (eg. after
product nas been commercialized) may iit
‘troubleshooting solutions. indeed, he intent of quality
by-design practices st inestigate all aspects ofthe
product development process and identi etical
{ualty atrbutes ana crtical process parameters. Ths
article provides an overview of issues that should be
considered when designing fim-coated products, Pan
coating of tablets i used as an example, but many of
the assertions ave relevant to fm coating in general,
Core design
Film-coating processes are stresful, both in terms
‘ofthe mactiancal ation tat takes place as well
‘as the environmental conditions (temperature and
‘humilty) within the coating process to which the
praduct being coated will be exposed, These stress
factors become more substantial when the coating
process's scaled up from the laboratory to full-scale
production, because the product exposure time to
such concitions increases.
‘Thus, a sensible approach uses a core material
‘thats resistant to suen stressful conctons.n
the case of tablets, designing cores that have
exceptional mechanical properties (in terms of both
‘mechanical strength and fility characteristics) is
essential, What isnot clear, however, is what defines
‘exceptional mechanical properties. The common
practice i to define mechanical strength in terms of
tablet. oreaking force, te required minimum value
of which increases with increasing tablet size. For this
reason, use of ow tality values becomes a good
surrogate to help define tablet robustness. Regardless
of tabiet size, tablets should possess friabity values
of < 0.1% if they are to be successfully fm coated an
the manufacturing scale.
Examples of common defects that can be
eliminated by effective core design are summarized
ln Tabi
Coating formulation design
‘The mechanical properties of the coating formulation
are equay important to thse ofthe core, because
Pharmaceutical Technology Europe rssusry 201 43Troubleshooting
both are subjected to the same
stresses. To some extent, the
‘mechanical behaviour of the coating
vl be augmented by that ofthe core,
because the core essentially acts as 8
scaffold forthe coating Key attributes
ofthe coating formulation tat, i
suitably optimized, can contribute
to the quality attroutes of the tral
product ae discussed a follows.
Mechanical strength (tensile
strength ofthe coating. This
atebute can effectively be used to
Prevent edge chipping and cracking
ofthe coating, which becomes much
‘more serious wen the applied
coating has a funcional purpose,
such as protecting the core trom
feviranmental moisture or modifying
srugrrelease characteristics (2,
‘delayed release and extended release
products
Coating flexibility (often defined
Interms of elastic modulus),
Coatings that ae flexible can offset
ledge chipping and are iss likly to
suffer from logo bridging problems.
Foxible coatings can more easly
changes tat are associated with
various factors, such as post
sweling due to thermal expansion
‘om exposure to process heat, and
sweling due to moisture absorption
44 Pharmaceutical Technology Europe reamussy 201
In an aqueous coating process where
drying condions are not ideal
Coating adhesion
characteristics. The surfaces of
many pharmaceutical orl solids
can present adhesion problems,
especialy when the coating
formusaton is detverea from an
aqueous coating system. The reasons
stem from lack of adequate core
Porosity tothe formation of high
energy surfaces where a high API
content, coupled withthe known
hydrophobic characteristics ofthe
(eg, ibuprofen presenta surface
thats dificult to wet wetting
a necessary precursor to good
‘adhesion. although some ofthese
Geficiencies can to some extent,
be offset when employing suitable
core formulation strategies, coating
formulations wit hign adhesion
characterstes, such as those
based on polymer mixtures using
hypromelise and copovidone or
hose that uiiz polyvinyl alcoho as
the primary polymer, can be useful in
setting adhesion-elated problem
such problems include coating rub-off
asthe tablets tumble inthe coating
pan and logo bridging where stresses
that develop within the coatig on
drying cause the coating to become
detached within the fogo as a result
of adhesive falluce (ee Table 0
Coating solution viscosity. The
Use of high-soids coating systems
‘allows the amount of solvent water)
that wll be sprayed to be reduced,
while maintaining coating suspension
well below the traktiona limit of
300 cP required to produce a quality
Coating. These systems offers many
benefits, inctuing
+ Reducing coating process time,
thus minimizing process costs,
‘as well as exposure time of
tablets to stressful process
conditions
improving product stability,
felher as a reut of reduced
process exposure time to high
processing temperatures and
humidities, or by minimizing
moisture penetration into the
cores, especially wnen process
High sods coatings contain less
water, thus presenting less of @
thermodynamic challenge tothe
‘evaporative capabiltes ofthe
coating process
Facltating the use of lower
processing temperatures, which
can be beneficial thermolable
2's.
Ie shouldbe recognized that rodsy
many pharmaceutical companies
prefer to buy ready-made coating
systems fram one ofa numberof
suppliers. In those cases, close
collaboration withthe selected
suppliers is necessary to ensure that
the coating system chosen Is optimal
for the product being coated and the
coating process that willbe used.
Although core and coating
formulation need tobe well
understood to avo downstream
problems, the coating process also
plays a major role. Three important
‘areas of any coating process that
need close attention areas follow
Coating process
thermodynamics. Process
thermodynamics affect the ability of
the process ar stream to effectively
remove solvent (eg, waten. The main
variables are temperature, moisture
content, an air mass (or volume)
Spray dynamic. spray dynamics
Influences croplet ze and size
Astrouton, veto, and drying whileTroubleshooting
‘able tA summary of coating Issues that can be avoided through effective core design.
Defect Description
Tablet twinning | Tablets stick together,
oaches to minimize defect:
‘Avoid use of tablets with large areas of fiat surfaces.
For capsule-shaped tablets, instead of creating tablets
itn straight sides as shown in the photograph)
introduce a sight degree of curvature to minimize the
risk of tablets sticking together when they are in the
tacky phase ust after coating has been depasited on
‘the surface
Tablet core
erosion Jor tate
|
Erosion occurs on faces
|
|
|
Ensure that tablets meet minimum frabilty standards
(0.1%,
Expose tablet cores to large-scale coating process
Conditions before core formulation i finalized,
Tablet breakage | hie tumbling in the
pan,
|
raves brat aurng pen |
|ieangr urea or |
Ensure tablets meet minimum breaking force
standards (for tablets > 500 mg, 180-200N; for tablets
150-500 mg, 130-160N; for tablets < 150mg, 80-100N
are useful targets
Examine pan loading and unloading procedures to
minimize damage.
|
Tablets chip on sharp
edge chipping | corners dand area).
Select compound radius punches to minimize
sharpness of edges on tablets.
‘Add plastically deforming excipients e.,
microcrystalline cellulose (MCC, hydroxypropyl
Cellulose) to core formulations to minimize brittleness.
Ensure tablet fiabilty values are < 0.1%.
Coating bridges across
Logo bridging)
in fight from the nozzle to the surface
of the tablet bed tao influences
spray fx, which sa combination of
spray rate nd the area over which
coating laud is detivered from each
spray gun onto the surface ofthe
tablet bed. Sora fx from each
spray gun in a muit-gun set up may
not be dentcal, unless the spray
rate and atomization conditions are
identical for each spray nozzle. Spray
‘dynamics als influence uniformity of
the clstribution ofthe coating. Spray
‘tynaics canbe infuenced by:
+ spray rate
+ Solids content ofthe coating
igus
+ Viscosity ofthe coating tquia
+ atomizing air press and volume
ce
au
for
the
+ Patter alr pressure and volume
+ Gunto-bed distance
+ Process airflow inside the
coating pan,
‘Those process factors, even when
retully selected during process sat
up, rarely stay constant throughout
1 coating process. although
r-to-bed distance may have
been measured during gun setup,
example ican change a the
bet bed moves because tablets
flow across the surtaces of baftes,
using the tablet surface to move
back and forth as the pan rotates. In
addition, a tne coating is apalies,
sip ofthe tablets can change,
1 the angle of the surface ofthe
tablet bed may change with it
Ensure that tablet core formulations ae sufficiently
robust to avoid need for high compaction forces,
hich can negatively affect core porosity a positive
factor in adhesion requirements
Include hydrophilic excipient (eg, MCC) in core
formulation that can enhance adhesion of fim coating
Tablet movement within
‘the coating pan. This aspect of
‘the coating process wil affect
attrtional effects within the
process (and hence mechanical
‘damage to tne tablets) and coating
distribution uniformity across a
batch of tablets. Tablet movement
may Impact drying within the
tablet bed, because the faster the
tablets move, the shorter the time
inthe spray zone, the less coating
material each tablet picks up, and
the faster that amaunt of coating
material can cry. Generally, as long
as the tabet cores and coating
formulation are suitably robust, the
faster the tablet motion within the
coating pan the better.
Pharmaceutical Technology Europe rowusy 2o%e 45‘Troubleshooting
So ent eee Pietra a)
Defect ription Eo oe
1. Reduce processing temperatures to minimize
Coating cracks due to thermal | core thermal expansion
Fim cracking | expansion of tablet cores and 2, Reduce drying conditions (or increase spray
(ype 0 lack of fm flexibility caused rate) so that some moisture retention in the
by overdrying, coating occurs to augment plastcization effects
(thus increasing fim flexibility)
een 1. move drying edu soay ret or nerease
a beetle y ) Temperature tof oveettng
Fim cracking | Swalri.caused by exces 2. itoese pansoeed to minimize Gel time in
type | moan aero Some
cores during appcation Pm 2 Gee ha sce costing systems toreauce
" ‘moisture burden on the drying process.
1. Minimize foam generation during preparation of
coating suspension,
2. Reduce atomizing conditions and/or reduce