Chapter 1 and 2 edited rubrics

RUBRICS FOR PERFORMANCE TASK

Research Title

Researchers ,
,
,
,

Rating Scale 1 = Failed 2 = Below Average 3 = Passed/Average

4 = Above Average 5 = Excellent

Items 1 2 3 4 5
I. INTRODUCTION (25%)
Background of the Study
• The introduction starts with a general statement of the problem
area. It gives general orientation to the reader and helps
him/her develop an appreciation for the problem, its place in the
discipline, and its importance and pertinence.
• There is a brief but careful review of the current state of knowledge
or literature in the area of the study.
• The historical background or context of the problem is presented.
Statement of the Problem
• There is statement of the aim of this research, especially how it
will fill the gap to solve the problem as such, or replicate related
research, etc.
• The statement of the problem/s is as specific and clearly defined
as possible. The time and place or context where the study is
undertaken should be stated.
• The statement of problem/s includes the specific constructs to
be measured or compared.
• Each statement is independent of one another (stands by itself).
• All assumptions, limitations, and delimitations are recognized.

II. RELATED LITERATURE (25%)

• Shows an awareness of major and recent developments in the
area of knowledge (theoretical, methodological, applied) being
studied inclusive of achievements and limitation in the area of
study.
• Relevance of previous researches to the problem is clearly and
adequately established.
• Points out potential or the need to solve this problem
(Justification for the choice of the problem).
• Backs up the researchers’ opinion with facts and theory from the
literature.
• Logically presents, with a clear outline, main topics and sub-
topics which are relevant.
• Makes clear connections between the sections of the review.
• All sources of information are clearly stated and presented,
and properly documented using style/format appropriate to
the discipline.
• There is a concise but comprehensive summary or synthesis of
relevant researches with various elements and concepts
coherently and systematically integrated, indicating areas of
agreement or
disagreements in findings or gaps in existing knowledge.

Downloaded by Kristine Gonzales (gonzaleskristine79@gmail.com)

Significance of the Study

Downloaded by Kristine Gonzales (gonzaleskristine79@gmail.com)

 • Discusses how the research would contribute to the field of
the study, e.g. Helps develop theory, expand knowledge,
advance methodology or evaluate a specific practice to
provide useful information.
• Specifies how the study would be beneficial to others in terms of
policy formulation or evaluation, practice and research.
Definition of Terms
• Conceptually and operationally defines terms used in the study.
• The operational definitions indicate the activities or
procedures undertaken to measure a variable, especially if it is
to be scored.
• Operational definitions indicate from whom the information is
collected and categories for classifying observations
formulated
and embodied in the definition.

III. METHOD (25%)

• The research design is appropriate to the problem.
• The population of the study is clearly specified.
• The sample size and characteristics are adequately described.
• The method or methods of drawing the sample from the
population are clearly specified and appropriate to the problem.
• The treatments and methods of data collection are clearly
described so that an independent investigator could replicate
the
study.
• There is a clear description and enough information on
the instrument/s used.
• There is a clear description of the procedures for data collection.
• Employs appropriate data treatment and analysis.

IV. REFERENCES (10%)

• All references are included. There are no missing entries.
• References are presented according to APA Style.

V. TECHNICAL ASPECT (5%)

• Uses correct grammar.
• Follows the correct format duly approved and recommended by
the Department.
• Logically organizes the research paper in terms of the flow of
content – connection among all the chapters and the chain of
reasoning and presentation.

VI. QUALITY OF PRESENTATION (10%)

• The presentation is clear and logical.
• Gives clear explanation and justification of questions raised by
the panel members.
• Gives objective and scholarly answers to questions raised by the
panel members.
• There is a minimal reliance on the mentor for answers to
questions raised by the panel members.
• All members show evidence of active participation and thorough
knowledge of the research.

GENERAL WEIGHTED AVERAGE

Comments:

Downloaded by Kristine Gonzales (gonzaleskristine79@gmail.com)

Evaluated by:

Signature of Panel Member over printed name

Downloaded by Kristine Gonzales (gonzaleskristine79@gmail.com)