Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Trading Srategy 01
Trading Srategy 01
Choosing the best approach among swing trading, positional trading, and
long-term investing depends on several factors, including your risk
tolerance, time commitment, and financial goals. Here's a breakdown of
each option considering your 36-hour workweek and weekends off:
1. Swing Trading:
2. Positional Trading:
3. Long-Term Investing:
Time commitment: least demanding. You can invest and hold for
years with minimal monitoring or adjustments.
Risk: generally considered lower risk than the other two options,
focusing on long-term market growth rather than short-term
fluctuations.
Benefits: Requires minimal time commitment, potentially aligning
well with your work schedule. However, returns might be lower
compared to the other options.
Considering your 36-hour workweek and weekends off, positional
trading appears to be the most suitable option. It offers a balance between
time commitment, risk, and potential return. You can manage your
positions around your work schedule without sacrificing too much
personal time.
While I can't give specific financial advice, I can provide some general
guidance on choosing between equities, futures, and options for positional
trading considering your situation:
Equities (Stocks):
Futures:
Options:
Risk Tolerance: Options involve more risk due to time decay and
complex strategies. Futures also have higher risk due to leverage.
Account Size: Leverage in futures can be beneficial for larger
accounts but risky for smaller ones.
Learning Curve: Options require a deeper understanding of options
strategies compared to equities.
Q. Great, I have above-average knowledge about investing and
trading. I usually do margin trading in equity. My broker
gives me 4x leverage with an unlimited holding period, but I
am also thinking about entering into equity futures for
positional trading. I invest 50% of my money in mutual funds
and index funds and 40% in margin-based long-term equity
trading. rest 10% I want to deploy into futures for achieving
more gain. ?
While it's good you're looking to diversify your portfolio with futures, it's
important to tread carefully considering your experience level and existing
margin trading in equities. Here's a breakdown of the potential benefits
and risks involved:
Overall, while equity futures can be a good tool for positional trading,
their complexity and higher risk make them less suitable for someone
with average investing knowledge and existing margin trading
experience. Starting cautiously, educating yourself, and potentially
exploring alternatives like leveraged ETFs might be a safer path.
Q. Great I am thinking about holding my positional trades in
equity and hedging them with futures. If trading in case of
any side-directional trend, I will close any one position. Is it
good for me?
The strategy you're describing, using equity holdings with futures hedges,
can be a viable approach for positional trading, but there are some nuances
to consider:
Potential Benefits:
Potential Drawbacks:
It's understandable that you might feel drawn to equity futures for
positional trading, given your experience with margin trading in equities.
However, it's important to manage your expectations and prioritize risk
mitigation.
Possible Benefits:
Reduced Risk: Hedging with futures can limit downside risk in your
long equity positions if the market falls.
Profit-Taking Flexibility: By closing either the equity or futures
position based on market direction, you can potentially lock in profits
on the winning side.
Potential Drawbacks:
The strategy you've described has some potential benefits, but also some
drawbacks to consider:
Possible Benefits:
Potential Drawbacks:
Here are some alternative approaches that might be more suitable for
your average investing knowledge level:
Overall, while the stop-loss with futures hedge has some promise, it
adds complexity and potential costs. Given your experience level,
prioritizing strong equity selection and potentially using a trailing stop-
loss might be a simpler and potentially more effective approach.