Professional Documents
Culture Documents
research-article2023
BBI0010.1177/11779322231162777Bioinformatics and Biology InsightsKhan
Identification of Conserved and Novel MicroRNAs with Bioinformatics and Biology Insights
Volume 17: 1–12
their Targets in Garden Pea (Pisum Sativum L.) Leaves © The Author(s) 2023
Article reuse guidelines:
ABSTRACT: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are single-stranded, endogenous, non-coding RNAs of 20–24 nucleotides that play a significant role in
post-transcriptional gene regulation. Various conserved and novel miRNAs have been characterized, especially from the plant species whose
genomes were well-characterized; however, information on miRNA in economically important plants such as pea (Pisum sativum L.) is limited.
In this study, I have identified conserved and novel miRNA in garden pea plant leaves samples along with their targets by analyzing the next
generation sequencing (NGS) data. The raw data obtained from NGS were processed and 1.38 million high-quality non-redundant reads were
retained for analysis, this tremendous quantity of reads indicates a large and diverse small RNA population in pea leaves. After analyzing the
deep sequencing data, 255 conserved and 11 novel miRNAs were identified in the garden pea leaves sample. Utilizing psRNATarget tool, the
miRNA targets of conserved and novel miRNA were predicted. Further, the functional annotation of the miRNA targets were performed using
blast2Go software and the target gene products were predicted. The miRNA target gene products along with GO_ID (Gene Ontology Identifier)
were categorized into biological processes, cellular components, and molecular functions. The information obtained from this study will provide
genomic resources that will help in understanding miRNA-mediated post-transcriptional gene regulation in garden peas.
Keywords: Conserved miRNA, novel miRNA, miRNA targets, small RNA, post-transcriptional gene regulation
RECEIVED: October 13, 2022. ACCEPTED: February 18, 2023. Declaration Of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared the following
potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of
Type: Original Research Article this article: The author declares that he has no known competing financial interests or
personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this
Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the article.
research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by BIRAC
SRISTI Appreciation Grant. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Qurshid Hasan Khan, Department of Plant Sciences,
University of Hyderabad, Gachibowli, Hyderabad 500046, Telangana, India. Email:
hasanqurshid@uohyd.ac.in
Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial
4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without
further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
2 Bioinformatics and Biology Insights
and abiotic stress, plants regulate gene expression at transcrip- specific 3’OH group of micro RNAs followed by ligation of
tional, post-transcriptional, and post-translational levels. A 5' adapter.
thorough understanding of the gene expression level at post- Illumina Universal and Index Adapters utilized in this study
transcriptional will help in the development of new strategies were as follows:
that will enhance plant stress tolerance. Universal Adapter:
To understand the transcriptional response in garden pea
plant, transcriptome analysis of pea tissues and organs were 5'-AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACGTTCA-
GAGTTCTACAGTCCGA-3'
fully investigated. To gain insights into garden pea plant post-
transcriptional and post-translational modification related to
Index Adapter:
stress, there is a need to study miRNAs in various organs and
tissues of pea plants under different conditions. As miRNAs 5 ' - CA AG CAG A AG ACG G CATACG AG AT [ I N D EX ]
can control various protein-coding genes associated with GTGACTGGAGTTCCTTGGCACCCGAGAATTCCA-3'
related gene families or genes that are involved in the same
pathway, it is interesting to study miRNA-mediated post-tran- Reverse transcription of adapter-ligated fragments was per-
scriptional gene regulation in pea plants.19 formed using Superscript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen).
The current literature lacks research studies on miRNA The cDNA generated from the reverse transcription was
related to pea plants. Therefore, in this study, to gain robust enriched and barcoded by PCR amplification (15 cycles).
information about the entire repertoire of miRNA present in Utilizing Polyacrylamide gel, the amplified library was size
garden peas, a small RNA library was prepared from young selected in the range of 140-160 bp followed by overnight gel
garden pea leaves tissues, followed by deep sequencing and bio- elution and precipitation in the presence of glycogen, 3M
informatic analyses. sodium acetate (Sigma, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA), and
absolute ethanol. Pellet was re-suspended in nuclease-free
Material and Methods water (Invitrogen, Whitefield, Bangalore). The workflow of
Sample preparation and extraction of total RNA TruSeq Small RNA sample preparation is shown in Figure 1.
Qubit fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA)
In this study, I have selected P. sativum (var. Arkel), which was
was used to quantify the Illumina-compatible sequencing
easily available in the local market of India. The growth of this
library. The Qubit concentration of the small RNA library was
variety was vigorous, and the plant can grow up to 45 cm
13.4 (ng/ul). Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer was used to analyze the
(http://agropedia.iitk.ac.in/content/vegetable-pea-varieties).
fragment size distribution. The fragment size of the Illumina-
Mature seeds of P. sativum (var. Arkel) were surface sterilized in
Compatible sequencing library ranges between 130 and 180
70% ethanol for 2 min and rinsed two times in sterile distilled
bp. Since the combined adapter size was approximately 120 bp,
water. The seeds were soaked in water overnight. Then, the
the effective user-defined insert size ranges between 10-60 bp.
seeds were sown in pots containing humus-rich soil. The plants
The raw NGS data of P. sativum young leaves sample was
were allowed to grow for a month in a net house. The plants
deposited in National Center for Biotechnology Information
were covered with plastic bags with holes. The young leaves
(NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database with acces-
were collected and immediately chilled in liquid nitrogen. The
sion PRJNA882352.
samples were stored at −80 C until RNA isolation. Utilizing
the Trizol reagent, as per the manufacturer’s instructions, total
RNA was extracted from the leaves. Data analysis of small RNA transcriptome
Using Nanodrop Spectrophotometer, the RNA concentra-
tion and purity were estimated. A good quality RNA with a After completion of the NGS run, the raw data were analyzed
very low amount of protein contamination would have A260/ using UEA small RNA Workbench (Version 4.6; http://srna-
A280 ratio greater than 1.8. Similarly, if the isolated RNA has a workbench.cmp.uea.ac.uk).22,23 In Oracle VM VirtualBox, a
very less amount of polysaccharides contamination, then A260/ virtual machine (VM) was created, and Ubuntu OS was
A280 will be greater than 1.8. The total RNA extracted in this installed on it. The adaptor sequences and low-quality reads
study has a concentration of 352.8 ng/ul, A260/A280 ratio of were filtered and the sequences between 16 to 40 nucleotides
2.19, A260/A230 ratio of 2.22 indicating a good quality RNA.20,21 were retained for further analysis. Then, using Rfam database,
the reads that match with other ncRNAs such as rRNA,
tRNA, snRNA, and snoRNAs were removed.24 Glycine max
Small RNA library preparation and deep genome was used as a reference genome. Using Bowtie soft-
sequencing
ware, the small RNA was aligned to the reference genome.25-27
Small RNA sequencing (sRNA) library was prepared with The mapped and unmapped reads were separated using
TruSeq Small RNA Sample Preparation protocol (Illumina, SAMtools. Using the CD-HIT program, a read count was
San Diego, California, USA). 1000 ng of total RNA was generated.28-30 The mature sequences of miRNA were down-
used as starting material. 3' adapters were ligated to the loaded from miRbase (https://www.mirbase.org/), a local
Khan 3
miRNA database was constructed, then a homology search the low-quality reads, adapters, and redundant sequences along
was performed using the ncbi-blast-2.13.0 + program to with rRNA (2,106), tRNA (424), mRNA (75,037), snRNA
identify the conserved miRNA with E-value of 0.001 and (1,024), and snoRNA (999), a total of 1,184,724 unique reads
non-gap alignment.31-35 Subsequently, the unaligned reads with lengths ranging from 16 to 40 nucleotides were retained
were used for predicting novel miRNAs using the MIREAP for further analysis. It was observed that in P. sativum young
program. A total of 29 novel miRNAs were predicted using leaves tissue small RNA library, the size of the small RNA was
the software; however, only 11 novel miRNAs have proper unevenly distributed as shown in Figure 3.
precursor secondary structure and MFEI values of > 0.70. The
secondary structure of the precursors was predicted using the Identification of conserved miRNAs
RNAfold web server.17,27,28,36-42 The MFEI values were calcu-
lated utilizing the following formula: To identify conserved miRNAs in P. sativum, Glycine max ref-
erence genome was downloaded from EnsemblPlants (https://
( MFE / length of RNA sequence) × 100 plants.ensembl.org/).The unique sequences ⩾16 bp and ⩽40 bp
MFEI =
%GC content length were considered for further analysis. Using Bowtie 1.3.1,
the reads were aligned to the Glycine max reference genome.
The targets for conserved and novel miRNA were predicted
Then, the aligned reads were separated. The reads were checked
using the psRNATarget tool.43,44 The steps involved in this
for rRNA, tRNA, snRNA, and snoRNA contamination using
study are shown in Figure 2.
the Rfam database. Finally, the filtered reads were used for con-
Results served miRNA prediction. Using the CD-HIT program, the
reads were made unique and the read count profile was
Analysis of small RNA transcriptome of P. sativum
generated.
As limited EST sequence information was present in the Using the NCBI-blast-2.13.0 + program, a homology
National Center for Biotechnology Information Expressed search of the unique miRNA reads was performed against
Sequence Tags database, it is highly impossible to identify matured miRNA sequences retrieved from miRbase-22. A
P. sativum miRNAs merely based on computational analy- total of 254 miRNA belonging to 56 different families were
sis. Next-generation high-throughput sequencing is a identified. miRNA family analysis revealed MIR-156 family
robust tool for the de novo identification of miRNA present was the most abundant, followed by MIR-166, MIR-159, etc.
in P. sativum. All the identified conserved miRNAs in P. sativum were shown
By utilizing high-throughput Illumina sequencing in this in Table 1.
study, a total of 12,713,919 raw reads were generated from the The rest of the information related to the conserved miR-
small RNA library of garden pea leaves tissue. After filtering NAs such as length, reference miRNA, read count, percent
4 Bioinformatics and Biology Insights
(Continued)
5
6
Table 1. (Continued)
miRNA Name Sequence (5'-3') miRNA Name Sequence (5'-3')
Family Family
(Continued)
Bioinformatics and Biology Insights
Khan
Table 1. (Continued)
miRNA Name Sequence (5'-3') miRNA Name Sequence (5'-3')
Family Family
(Continued)
7
8
Table 1. (Continued)
miRNA Name Sequence (5'-3') miRNA Name Sequence (5'-3')
Family Family
(Continued)
Bioinformatics and Biology Insights
Table 1. (Continued) Khan
miRNA Name Sequence (5'-3') miRNA Name Sequence (5'-3')
Family Family
In this study, a total of 12,838 corresponding potential tar- components, and molecular functions.48,49 All the data related
get gene products of P. sativum miRNAs were detected (9,715 to conserved and novel miRNA targets, miRNA target gene
target gene products for conserved miRNA and 1,064 target products, and gene ontology functional categorization were
gene products for novel miRNA). Approximately 83% of the attached as Supplementary Data S3 and S4.
conserved miRNA directly cleaves the target mRNA whereas
the rest of the conserved miRNA performs translational repres- Discussion
sion on the target mRNA. As 11 novel miRNAs were identi- Over the past few years, NGS or deep sequencing technologies
fied, some of them directly cleave the target mRNA and some have been used in different molecular biology studies.15,50
perform translational repression. Various studies have been conducted to identify conserved and
In the conserved miRNAs, psa-miR1527 (191) has the novel miRNAs in different plant species; however, miRNA and
highest number of potential targets, followed by psa-miR5261 their target remain unknown in an economically important
(171) and psa-miR396 g-3p (165), whereas in novel miRNAs plant such as garden pea.
psa-m0025-3p (161) has the higher number of targets, fol- The small RNA size distribution pattern in P. sativum
lowed by psa-m0028-5p (145) and psa-m0016-3p (121). young leaves shows that 63% of small RNA reads lie between
Functional annotation of the miRNA target was performed 20 and 24 nucleotides and 24 nucleotides length small RNA
using Blast2Go software. The GO (Gene Ontology) terms reads are dominant (41%) in the entire sRNA transcriptome. A
were obtained. The miRNA target gene products along with large number of sequencing reads of miRNA belonging to
GO_ID were categorized into biological processes, cellular MIR-156, MIR-159, and MIR-166 families support the deep
Khan 11
Conclusions
In conclusion, in this study, a small-RNA library was prepared
by high-throughput sequencing of P. sativum leaves to identify
the conserved and novel miRNAs along with their potential
targets. This study provides the first report on the identifica-
tion of conserved and novel miRNAs in P. sativum leaves by
deep sequencing. The valuable information obtained from this
study will provide a strong base for the researchers to select the
candidate miRNA or MIR family in P. sativum plants and
check the regulatory role-played by the miRNA in response to
biotic and abiotic stress, growth, and development. In addition,
this study will enlighten our understanding of miRNA-medi-
ated post-transcriptional gene regulation and could be helpful
in the annotation of the genome.
Acknowledgements
I am thankful to the Department of Plant Sciences and
School of Life Science, University of Hyderabad, for their
support and cooperation. I would like to express my deep-
est gratitude to Prof. Ch. Venkataramana, Department of
Figure 4. Secondary structure of novel psa-m0023-3p miRNA and Plant Sciences, University of Hyderabad, and Dr. Satendra
psa-m0028-5p miRNA. Kumar Mangrauthia, Senior Scientist, IIRR, for their
support.
sequencing data in other leguminous species such as Medicago
and peanut.51,52 Author Contributions
Q.H.K. conceived, planned, and carried out the experiment, processed
Conversely, in wheat and rice plant species, MIR-169 fam- the experimental data, performed the analysis and interpretation of
ily sequencing reads are high in number and MIR-156 family results, and prepared the manuscript.
reads were very low in abundance indicating the presence of
species-specific expression profile of miRNA.53 All the detected Supplemental Material
novel miRNAs had MFEI value > 72 and appropriate second- Supplemental material for this article is available online.
ary structures.
The variation in sequencing reads numbers of different
References
members or isoforms of a miRNA family in P. sativum indicates 1. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell.
that the regulatory role of the isoform is dominant during the 2004;116:281-297.
particular stage of development. For instance, the MIR-172 2. Chen X. MicroRNA biogenesis and function in plants. FEBS Lett. 2005;579:
5923-59310.
family is likely to play a significant role in phase transformation 3. Vazquez F, Legrand S, Windels D. The biosynthetic pathways and biological
and floral organ development in various plant species, and the scopes of plant small RNAs. Trends Plant Sci. 2010;15:337-345.
4. Yoshikawa M, Peragine A, Park MY, Poethig RS. A pathway for the biogenesis
reads number of psa-miR172a (64) belonging to the MIR-172 of trans-acting siRNAs in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2005;19:2164-2175.
family was high compared to other isoforms of the family.54 The 5. Chen X. A microRNA as a translational repressor of APETALA2 in Arabidop-
sis flower development. Science. 2004;303:2022-2025.
comparative study of various miRNA isoforms present in a 6. Sunkar R, Kapoor A, Zhu JK. Posttranscriptional induction of two Cu/Zn
miRNA family during a particular stage of development or at superoxide dismutase genes in Arabidopsis is mediated by downregulation of
12 Bioinformatics and Biology Insights
miR398 and important for oxidative stress tolerance. Plant Cell. 2006;18: 32. Kozomara A, Griffiths-Jones S. miRBase: annotating high confidence microR-
2051-2065. NAs using deep sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;42:D68-D73.
7. Lu S, Sun YH, Chiang VL. Stress-responsive microRNAs in Populus. Plant J. 33. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment
2008;55:131-151. search tool. J Mol Bio. 1990;215:403-410.
8. Zhang B, Pan X, Stellwag EJ. Identification of soybean microRNAs and their 34. He X, Shenkute AG, Wang W, Xu S. Characterization of Conserved and Novel
targets. Planta. 2008;229:161-182. microRNAs in Lilium lancifolium Thunb. by high-throughput sequencing. Sci
9. Zhou X, Wang G, Sutoh K, Zhu JK, Zhang W. Identification of cold-inducible Rep. 2018;8:2880.
microRNAs in plants by transcriptome analysis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 35. Yan G, Zhang J, Jiang M, Gao X, Yang H, Li L. Identification of known and
2008;1779:780-788. novel MicroRNAs in raspberry organs through high-throughput sequencing.
10. Ding D, Zhang L, Wang H, Liu Z, Zhang Z, Zheng Y. Differential expression Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:728.
of miRNAs in response to salt stress in maize roots. Ann Bot. 2009;103:29-38. 36. Qibin L, Jiang W. MIREAP: microRNA discovery by deep sequencing, 2008,
11. Kundu A, Paul S, Dey A, Pal A. High throughput sequencing reveals modula- https://sourceforge.net/projects/mireap/ (accessed 10 May 2022).
tion of microRNAs in Vigna mungo upon Mungbean Yellow Mosaic India Virus 37. Mazhar MW, Raza A, Sikandar M, et al. Cytochrome C and COI Sequence of
inoculation highlighting stress regulation. Plant Sci. 2017;257:96-105. O. laetus review. Austin J Pharmacol Ther. 2021;9:1142.
12. Kidner CA, Martienssen RA. The developmental role of microRNA in plants. 38. Saleem T, Shahzadi MB, Hafeez S, Mumtaz M, Mazhar MW. (2021) Identifi-
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2005;8:38-44. cation and phylogenetic analysis of KUP/HAK/KT gene family in Daucus
13. Paul S, Kundu A, Pal A. Identification and validation of conserved microRNAs carota (wild carrot). Quant J Med Health Sci. 2021;1:36-52.
along with their differential expression in roots of Vigna unguiculata grown 39. Mazhar MW, Yusof NY, Shaheen T, Saif S, Raza A, Mazhar F. Sequence, sec-
under salt stress. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 2011;105:233-242. ondary structure, and phylogenetic conservation of MicroRNAs in Arabidopsis
14. Rajagopalan R, Vaucheret H, Trejo J, Bartel DP. A diverse and evolutionarily thaliana. Bioinform Biol Insights. 2022;16:11779322221142116.
fluid set of microRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes Dev. 2006;20: 40. Lorenz R, Bernhart SH, Höner zu Siederdissen C, et al. ViennaRNA Package
3407-3425. 2.0. Algorith Molec Biol. 2011;6:26.
15. Yao Y, Guo G, Ni Z, et al. Cloning and characterization of microRNAs from 41. Sripathi VR, Choi Y, Gossett ZB, Stelly DM, Moss EM, et al. Identification of
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genome Biol. 2007;8:R96. microRNAs and their targets in four Gossypium species using RNA sequencing.
16. Morin RD, Aksay G, Dolgosheina E, et al. Comparative analysis of the small Current Plant Biology. 2018;14:30-40.
RNA transcriptomes of Pinus contorta and Oryza sativa. Genome Res. 42. Gu Y, Liu Y, Zhang J, et al. Identification and characterization of microRNAs in
2008;18:571-584. the developing maize endosperm. Genomics. 2013;102:472-478.
17. Creighton CJ, Reid JG, Gunaratne PH. Expression profiling of microRNAs by 43. Dai X, Zhuang Z, Zhao PX. psRNATarget: a plant small RNA target analysis
deep sequencing. Brief Bioinfo. 2009;10:490-497. server (2017 release). Nucleic Acids Research. 2018;46:W49-W54.
18. Git A, Dvinge H, Salmon Divon -M, et al. Systematic comparison of microarray 44. Anders S, Huber W. Differential expression analysis for sequence. Genome Biol.
profiling, real-time PCR, and next-generation sequencing technologies for mea- 2010;11:R106.
suring differential microRNA expression. RNA. 2010;16:991-1006. 45. Zhang BH, Pan XP, Cox SB, Cobb GP, Anderson TA. Evidence that miRNAs
19. Shukla LI, Chinnusamy V, Sunkar R. The role of microRNAs and other endog- are different from other RNAs. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006;63:246-254.
enous small RNAs in plant stress responses. Biochim Biophys Acta. 46. Mathews DH, Disney MD, Childs JL, Schroeder SJ, Zuker M, Turner DH. Incor-
2008;1779:743-748. porating chemical modification constraints into a dynamic programming algorithm
20. Sambrook J, Fritsch ER, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd for prediction of RNA secondary structure. PNAS. 2004;101:7287-7292.
ed. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989. 47. Srivastava PK, Moturu TR, Pandey P, Baldwin IT, Pandey SP. A comparison of
21. Manchester KL. Use of UV methods for measurement of protein and nucleic acid performance of plant miRNA target prediction tools and the characterization of
concentrations. Biotechniques. 1996;20:968-970. features for genome-wide target prediction. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:348.
22. Stocks MB, Moxon S, Mapleson D, Woolfenden HC, Mohorianu I. The UEA 48. Dang Y, Ouyang X, Zhang F, et al. Circular RNAs expression profiles in human
sRNA workbench: a suite of tools for analysing and visualizing next generation gastric cancer. Sci Rep. 2017;7:9060.
sequencing microRNA and small RNA datasets. Bioinformatics. 2012;28: 49. Conesa A, Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Talón M, Robles M. Blast2GO:
2059-2061. a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics
23. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. Ultrafast and memory-efficient research. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:3674-3676.
alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R25. 50. Rajagopalan R, Vaucheret H, Trejo J, Bartel DP. A diverse and evolutionarily
24. Kalvari I, Nawrocki EP, Argasinska J, et al. Non-coding RNA analysis using the fluid set of microRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes Dev. 2006;20:
Rfam database. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2018;62:e51. 3407-3425.
25. Ben L. Aligning short sequencing reads with Bowtie. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 51. Zhao CZ, Xia H, Frazier TP, et al. Deep sequencing identifies novel and
2011;11:117. conserved microRNAs in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.). BMC Plant Biol.
26. Giannoulatou E, Park SH, Humphreys DT, Ho JW. Verification and validation 2010;10:3.
of bioinformatics software without a gold standard: a case study of BWA and 52. Szittya G, Moxon S, Santos DM, et al. High-throughput sequencing of Medi-
Bowtie. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014;15:S15. cago truncatula short RNAs identifies eight new miRNA families. BMC Genom-
27. Bao S, Jiang R, Kwan W, Wang B, Ma X, Song YQ. Evaluation of next-generation ics. 2008;9:593.
sequencing software in mapping and assembly. J Hum Genet. 2011;56:406-414. 53. Sunkar R, Zhou X, Zheng Y, Zhang W, Zhu JK. Identification of novel and can-
28. Li W, Godzik A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets didate miRNAs in rice by high throughput sequencing. BMC Plant Biol.
of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:1658-1659. 2008;8:25.
29. Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next 54. Wang T, Ping X, Cao Y, et al. Genome-wide exploration and characterization of
generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:23. miR172/euAP2 genes in Brassica napus L. For likely role in flower organ devel-
30. Cruz Gaia AS, CaraccioloGomes de Sá PH, deOliveira MS, de OliveiraVeras opment. BMC Plant Biology. 2019;19:336.
AA. NGS reads treatment—a cuckoo filter-based tool for removing duplicate 55. Sunkar R, Zhu JK. Novel and stress-regulated microRNAs and other small
reads in NGS data. Sci Rep. 2019;9:11681. RNAs from Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2004;16:2001-2019.
31. Ahmed W, Xia Y, Zhang H, et al. Identification of conserved and novel miR- 56. Zhang BH, Pan XP, Wang QL, Cobb GP, Anderson TA. Identification and
NAs responsive to heat stress in flowering Chinese cabbage using high-through- characterization of new plant microRNAs using EST analysis. Cell Res.
put sequencing. Sci Rep. 2019;9:14922. 2005;15:336-360.