Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Operations Management
Chapter 6
Quality Control
William J. Stevenson
11h edition
10-2 Quality Control
Quality Control
• Quality control is a process that measures
output relative to standard, and acts when
output doesn't meet standards.
• The purpose of quality control is to assure that
processes are performing in an acceptable
manner.
• Companies accomplish quality control by
monitoring process output using statistical
techniques.
10-3 Quality Control
Inspection and
Inspection corrective Quality built
before/after action during into the
production production process
Inspection
• Inspection is an appraisal activity that compares
goods or services to a standard.
• Inspection can occur at three points:
- before production: is to make sure that inputs
are acceptable.
- during production: to make sure that the
conversion of inputs into outputs is proceeding
in an acceptable manner.
- after production: to make a final verification
of conformance before passing goods to
customers
10-5 Quality Control
Inspection
• Inspection before and after production
involves acceptance sampling procedure.
• Monitoring during the production process is
referred as process control
Figure 10.2
10-6 Quality Control
Inspection
• The purpose of inspection is to provide
information on the degree to which items
conform to a standard.
• The basic issues of inspection are:
1 - how much to inspect and how often
2- At what points in the process inspection
should occur.
3 - whether to inspect in a centralized or on-site
location.
4- whether to inspect attributes (counts) or
variables (measures)
10-7 Quality Control
Inspection Costs
Figure 10.3
Cost
Total Cost
Cost of
inspection
Cost of
passing
defectives
Optimal
Amount of Inspection
10-9 Quality Control
Control Chart
Control Chart
Figure 10.4
Mean
Normal variation
due to chance
LCL
Abnormal variation
due to assignable sources
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Sample number
10-15 Quality Control
Sampling Distribution
• The variability of a sample statistic can be
described by its sampling distribution.
• The sampling distribution is a theoretical
distribution that describe the random variability of
a sample statistic.
• The goal of the sampling distribution is to
determine whether nonrandom-and thus,
correctable-source of variation are present in the
output of a process. How?
10-19 Quality Control
Sampling distribution
• Suppose there is a process for filling bottles with
soft drink. If the amount of soft drink in a large
number of bottles (e.g., 100) is measured
accurately, we would discover slight differences
among the bottles.
• If these amounts were arranged in a graph, the
frequency distribution would reflect the process
variability.
• The values would be clustered close to the process
average, but some values would vary somewhat
from the mean.
10-20 Quality Control
Sampling Distribution
Figure 10.5
Sampling
distribution
Process
distribution
Mean
10-22 Quality Control
Sampling distribution
Properties
• The sampling distribution exhibits much less
variability than the process distribution.
• The sampling distribution has the same mean as
the process distribution.
• The sampling distribution is a normal distribution
regardless of the shape of the process distribution.
(central limit theorem).
10-23 Quality Control
Mean = Mean =
2
Variance = 2 Variance = n
Standard deviation =
Standard deviation =
n
Where:
n = sample size
10-24 Quality Control
Normal Distribution
Figure 10.6
= Standard deviation
99.74%
10-25 Quality Control
Control limits
• Control charts have two limits that separate random
variation and nonrandom variation.
• Control limits are based on sampling distribution
• Theoretically, the normal distribution extends in either
direction to infinity. Therefore, any value is theoretically
possible.
• As a practical matter, we know that 99.7% of the values
will be within ±3 standard deviation of the mean of the
distribution.
• Therefore, we could decide to set the control limit at the
values that represent ±3 standard deviation from the mean
10-26 Quality Control
Control Limits
Figure 10.7
Sampling
distribution
Process
distribution
Mean
Lower Upper
control control
limit limit
10-27 Quality Control
SPC hypotheses
Null hypothesis
H0: the process is in control
Alternative hypothesis
H1: the process is out of control
Actual situation
SPC Errors
• Type I error
• Concluding a process is not in control when it
actually is. The probability of rejecting H0 when
it is actually true.
• Type II error
• Concluding a process is in control when it is not.
The probability of accepting H0 when it is
actually not true.
10-29 Quality Control
Type I Error
Figure 10.8
/2 /2
Mean
UCL
LCL
1 2 3 4
Sample number
10-31 Quality Control
Mean chart
Sample
1 2 3 4 5
1 12.11 12.15 12.09 12.12 12.09
Observation
2 12.10 12.12 12.09 12.10 12.14
3 12.11 12.10 12.11 12.08 12.13
4 12.08 12.11 12.15 12.10 12.12
12.10 12.12 12.11 12.10 12.12
x
10-36 Quality Control
Solution
• n=4
• z=3
• = 0.02
Control chart
UCL
12.14
12.11
x
LCL
12.08
1 2 3 4 5
Sample
10-38 Quality Control
Mean chart
• A second approach to calculate the control limits:
• This approach assumes that the range is in control
UCL = x + A2 R
LCL = x − A2 R
This approach is
recommended when
Where: the process standard
deviation is not
A2 = A factor from table 10.2 Page 441 known
Example
• Twenty samples of n = 8 have been taken from a
cleaning operations. The average sample range for the
20 samples was 0.016 minute, and the average mean
was 3 minutes. Determine three-sigma control limits
for this process.
• Solution
R-chart
• Example
Twenty-five samples of n = 10 observations have been
taken from a milling process. The average sample range
was 0.01 centimeter. Determine upper and lower control
limits for sample ranges.
• Solution
R = 0.01 cm, n = 10
From table 10.2, for n = 10, D4 = 1.78 and D3 = 0.22
UCL = 1.78(0.01) = 0.0178 or 0.018
LCL = 0.22(0.01) = 0.0022 or 0.002
10-42 Quality Control
R-Chart
• Example
Small boxes of cereal are labeled “net weight 10
ounces.” Each hour, a random sample of size n = 4
boxes are weighted to check process control. Five hours
of observation yielded the following:
Time Box 1 Box 2 Box 3 Box 4 Range
9 A.M. 9.8 10.4 9.9 10.3 0.6
10 A.M 10.1 10.2 9.9 9.8 0.4
11 A.M 9.9 10.5 10.3 10.1 0.6
Noon 9.7 9.8 10.3 10.2 0.6
1 P.M 9.7 10.1 9.9 9.9 0.4
10-43 Quality Control
R-Chart
• Solution
n=4
For n = 4 , D3 = 0 and D4 = 2.28
(process mean is
shifting upward)
Sampling
Distribution
UCL
UCL
Does not
R-chart
detect shift
LCL
10-46 Quality Control
Sampling
Distribution (process variability is increasing)
UCL
Does not
x-Chart
LCL
reveal increase
UCL
Use of p-Charts
Table 10.3
• When observations can be placed into two
categories.
• Good or bad
• Pass or fail
• Operate or don’t operate
• When the data consists of multiple samples
of several observations each
10-50 Quality Control
P-Charts
• The theoretical basis for the P-chart is the binomial
distribution, although for large sample sizes, the normal
distribution provides a good approximation to it.
• A P-chart is constructed and used in much the same way
as a mean chart.
• The center line on a P-chart is the average fraction
defective in the population, P.
• The standard deviation of the sampling distribution when
P is known is:
p (1 − p )
p =
n
10-51 Quality Control
P-Chart
P-Chart
• Example
An inspector counted the number of defective
monthly billing statements of a company
telephone in each of 20 samples. Using the
following information, construct a control chart
that will describe 99.74 percent of the chance
variation in the process when the process is in
control. Each sample counted 100 statements.
10-53 Quality Control
P-Chart
• Example (cont.)
Sample # of defective Sample # of defective
1 4 11 8
2 10 12 12
3 12 13 9
4 3 14 10
5 9 15 21
6 11 16 10
7 10 17 8
8 22 18 12
9 13 19 10
10 10 20 16
Total 220
10-54 Quality Control
P-Chart
•Solution
Z for 99.74 percent is 3
220
p= = 0.11
20(100)
^ p (1 − p ) 0.11(1 − 0.11)
p = = = 0.03
n 100
P-Chart
• Solution (cont.)
Fraction
defective
0.20 UCL
0.11 p
0.02 LCL
1 10 20
Sample number
10-56 Quality Control
Use of c-Charts
Table 10.3
• Use only when the number of occurrences per
unit of measure can be counted; non-
occurrences cannot be counted.
• Scratches, chips, dents, or errors per item
• Cracks or faults per unit of distance
• Breaks or Tears per unit of area
• Bacteria or pollutants per unit of volume
• Calls, complaints, failures per unit of time
10-57 Quality Control
C-Chart
• When the goal is to control the number of occurrences (e.g.,
defects) per unit, a C-chart is used.
• Units might be automobiles, hotel rooms, typed papers, or rolls of
carpet.
• The underlying sampling distribution is the Poisson distribution.
• Use of Poisson distribution assumes that defects occur over some
continuous region and that the probability of more than one
defect at any particular point is negligible.
• The mean number of defects per unit is c and the standard
deviation is:
c
10-58 Quality Control
C-Chart
• Control Limits
UCL = c + z c
LCL = c − z c
C-Chart
• Example sample # of Sample # of
Rolls of coiled wire are defects defects
monitored using c-chart. 1 3 10 1
Eighteen rolls have been
2 2 11 3
examined, and the number
of defects per roll has 3 4 12 4
been recorded in the 4 5 13 2
following table. Is the
5 1 14 4
process in control? Plot
the values on a control 6 2 15 2
chart using three standard 7 4 16 1
deviation control limit.
8 1 17 3
9 2 18 1
45
10-60 Quality Control
C-Chart
• Solution
Average number of defects per coil = c = 45/18 =2.5
control charts
• At what point in the process to use control charts: at the
part of the process that (1) have tendency to go out of
control, (2) are critical to the successful operation of
the product or service.
• What size samples to take: there is a positive relation
between sample size and the cost of sampling.
• What type of control chart to use:
• Variables: gives more information than attributes
• Attributes: less cost and time than variables
10-62 Quality Control
Run Tests
• Run test – a test for randomness
• Control charts test for points that are too extreme to be
considered random.
• However, even if all points are within the control
limits, the data may still not reflect a random process.
• Any sort of pattern in the data would suggest a non-
random process.
• The presence of patterns, such as trends, cycles, or bias
in the output indicates that assignable, or nonrandom,
cause of variation exist.
• Analyst often supplement control charts with a run
test, which is another kind of test for randomness.
10-63 Quality Control
Run Test
• A run is defined as a sequence of observations with a
certain characteristic, followed by one or more
observations with a different characteristic.
• The characteristic can be anything that is observable.
Run test
• There are two types of run test:
1. Runs up and down
2. Runs above and below the median
• In order to count these runs, the data are transformed
into a series of U’s and D’s (for up and down) and into
a series of A’s and B’s (for above and below the
median).
• There are three U/D and four A/B runs for the data:
25 29 42 40 35 38
- U U D D U
B B A A B A
Where the median is 36.5
10-66 Quality Control
Counting Runs
B A A B A B B B A A B
U U D U D U D U U D
10-67 Quality Control
Run test
• Example sample mean sample Mean
Twenty sample means 1 10 11 10.7
have been taken from a
process. The means are 2 10.4 12 11.3
shown in the following 3 10.2 13 10.8
table. Use median and 4 11.5 14 11.8
up/down run test with
5 10.8 15 11.2
z = 2 to determine if
assignable causes of 6 11.6 16 11.6
variation are present. 7 11.1 17 11.2
Assume the median is 11. 8 11.2 18 10.6
9 10.6 19 10.7
10 10.9 20 11.9
10-70 Quality Control
Run test
• Solution
sample mean A/B U/D Sample Mean A/B U/D
1 10 B - 11 10.7 B D
2 10.4 B U 12 11.3 A U
3 10.2 B D 13 10.8 B D
4 11.5 A U 14 11.8 A U
5 10.8 B D 15 11.2 A D
6 11.6 A U 16 11.6 A U
7 11.1 A D 17 11.2 A D
8 11.2 A U 18 10.6 B D
9 10.6 B D 19 10.7 B U
10 10.9 B U 20 11.9 A U
10-71 Quality Control
Run test
Solution (cont.)
1. A/B: 10 runs and U/D: 17 runs
2. Expected number of runs for each test is:
N 20
E (r ) med = +1 = + 1 = 11
2 2 Although the median
2 N − 1 2(20) − 1
E (r ) u / d =
3
=
3
= 13 test doesn’t reveal any
pattern, because its Ztest
3. The standard deviations are: value is within ±2, the
N −1 20 − 1 up/down test does; its
med = = = 2.18
4 4 value exceed +2.
16 N − 29 16(20) − 29 consequently,
u/d = = = 1.8
90 90 nonrandom variations
4. The ztest values are: are probably present in
Z med =
10 − 11
= −0.46
the data and, hence, the
2.18
17 − 13
process is not in control
Zu / d = = 2.22
1.8
10-72 Quality Control
Process Capability
• Tolerances or specifications
• Range of acceptable values established by
engineering design or customer requirements
• Process variability
• Natural variability in a process
• Process capability
• Process variability relative to specification
10-73 Quality Control
Capability analysis
• Capability analysis is the determination of whether the
variability inherent in the output of a process falls within
the acceptable range of variability allowed by the design
specification for the process output.
• If it is within the specifications, the process is said to be
“capable.” if it is not, the manager must decide how to
correct the situation.
• We cannot automatically assume that a process that is in
control will provide desired output. Instead, we must
specifically check whether a process is capable of meeting
specifications and not simply set up a control chart to
monitor it.
• A process should be both in control and within
specifications before production begins.
10-74 Quality Control
Process Capability
Figure 10.15
Lower Upper
Specification Specification
A. Process variability
matches specifications
Lower Upper
Specification Specification
B. Process variability
Lower Upper
well within specifications Specification Specification
C. Process variability
exceeds specifications
10-75 Quality Control
Capability analysis
• If the product doesn’t meet specifications (not capable) a
manager might consider a range of possible solutions such
as:
1. Redesign the process.
2. Use an alternative process.
3. Retain the current process but attempt to eliminate
unacceptable output using 100% inspection.
4. Examine the specifications to see whether they are
necessary or could be relaxed without adversely affecting
customer satisfaction.
10-76 Quality Control
Capability analysis
• Example
A manager has the option of using any one of three
machines for a job. The machines and their standard
deviations are listed below. Determine which machines
are capable if the specifications are 10 mm and 10.8
mm.
Machine Standard deviation
(mm)
A 0.13
B 0.08
C 0.16
10-78 Quality Control
Capability analysis
•Solution
Capability = 6
Capability ratio
Example
Compute the process capability ratio for each machine
in the previous example
Solution
Machine Standard Machine Cp Capable
deviation capability
(mm) 6
A 0.13 0.78 0.8/0.78= 1.03 No
B 0.08 0.48 0.8/0.48 = 1.67 Yes
C 0.16 0.96 0.8/0.96 = 0.83 No
Only machine B is capable because its ratio exceed 1.33
10-80 Quality Control
Lower Upper
specification specification
Process
mean
+/- 3 Sigma
+/- 6 Sigma
10-81 Quality Control
Cpk ratio
• If a process is not centered (the mean of the
process is not in the center of the specification), a
more appropriate measure of process capability is
the Cpk ratio, because it does take the process
mean into account.
• The Cpk is equal the smaller of
Upper specification – process mean
3
And
Process mean – lower specification
3
10-82 Quality Control
Cpk Ratio
• Example
A process has a mean of 9.2 grams and a standard
deviation 0f 0.3 grams. The lower specification limit
is 7.5 grams and upper specification limit is 10.5
grams. Compute Cpk
Solution
1. Compute the ratio for the lower specification:
9.2 − 7.5 1.7
= = 1.89
3(.3) 0.9
2. Compute the ratio for the upper specification:
10.5 − 9.2 1.3 The smaller of the two ratios is 1.44
= = 1.44
3(0.3) .9 (greater than 1.33), so this is the Cpk .
Therefore, the process is capable
10-83 Quality Control
• Mistake-proof
• Upgrade equipment
• Automate
10-84 Quality Control