Title: Mastering the Art of Writing a Literature Review

Are you struggling with the daunting task of writing a literature review? You're not alone. Crafting a
comprehensive and cohesive literature review can be a challenging endeavor, requiring extensive
research, critical analysis, and effective synthesis of existing literature. However, fear not, as help is
at hand.

Writing a literature review involves more than just summarizing existing research. It requires you to
critically evaluate the available literature, identify gaps, and offer insights into the current state of
knowledge on a particular topic. This process demands patience, attention to detail, and strong
analytical skills.

One of the biggest hurdles in writing a literature review is the sheer volume of information available.
Sorting through numerous articles, books, and other sources can be overwhelming, making it difficult
to discern which sources are relevant and which ones aren't. Additionally, synthesizing information
from diverse sources and integrating them into a coherent narrative poses its own set of challenges.

Moreover, ensuring that your literature review is well-structured and effectively communicates your
arguments and findings adds another layer of complexity. Organizing the information logically,
maintaining a clear and concise writing style, and adhering to academic conventions and citation
styles are essential aspects of producing a high-quality literature review.

Fortunately, there's a solution to ease your burden. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers professional

assistance with writing literature reviews. Our team of experienced writers specializes in conducting
thorough research, critically analyzing literature, and crafting well-written and structured literature
reviews tailored to your specific requirements.

By availing our services, you can save time and effort while ensuring that your literature review
meets the highest standards of quality and academic rigor. Whether you're a student grappling with
an assignment or a researcher aiming to publish a scholarly article, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ is your
trusted partner in achieving academic success.

Don't let the challenges of writing a literature review hold you back. Trust ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ to
deliver exceptional results and take your academic writing to the next level. Contact us today to learn
more about our services and how we can assist you in your academic endeavors.
Select the plagiarism report if you feel you need it to prove the service quality. Fullscreen Sharing
Deliver a distraction-free reading experience with a simple link. Last but not least, if it’s your
intention to develop a conceptual framework for your dissertation or thesis, the conclusion section is
a good place to present this. Laser acupuncture for myofascial pain of the masticatory muscles. The
body of your literature review should do just as the description of this chapter suggests. In order to
minimize the risk of omitting eligible studies not captured by the original search, they supplemented
all electronic searches with manual screening of trial registers and references contained in the
included studies. Sometimes, students hesitate whether to trust authors or not. Include each of the
key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms. You can add
to this list if you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search. Likewise, if you’re
a corporate office employee, you may be required to conduct research. You can choose the
intellectual lineage you would like to be part of and whose definitions matter most to your thinking
(mostly humanities-specific, but this goes for sciences as well). Stage 3: selecting studies The process
of selecting studies will consist of two stages: (1) title and abstract screening and (2) full-text
screening. However, there are situations in which it is neither reasonable nor appropriate to pool
studies together using meta-analytic methods simply because there is extensive clinical heterogeneity
between the included studies or variation in measurement tools, comparisons, or outcomes of
interest. For example, a review of the Internet’s impact on American presidential politics could focus
on the development of online political satire. By answering this question, we hope to provide an
overview of which groups and populations have been studied. To this end, they provide a number of
recommendations to strengthen knowledge development towards improving the design and
execution of future reviews on home telemonitoring. 9.4. Summary Table 9.1 outlines the main types
of literature reviews that were described in the previous sub-sections and summarizes the main
characteristics that distinguish one review type from another. Acupuncture for the prevention of
tension-type headache. It is useful when emphasizing the methodologies used by researchers and
their implications for the findings. Writing a literature review involves finding relevant publications
(such as books and journal articles), critically analyzing them, and explaining what you found. How
social media meet patients questions: YouTube review for mouth sores in children. Kiziloglu - 2015 -
The effect of organizational learning on firm innovation c. Still, they do provide an excellent
beginning point for finding better, more extensive materials. Summarise your literature review by
citing all the existing research literature you have studied and the prominent features that you have
highlighted. A scoping review was chosen as the most appropriate methodology. Social Posts Create
on-brand social posts and Articles in minutes. Their model follows the systematic data processing
approach comprised of three steps, namely: (a) literature search and screening; (b) data extraction and
analysis; and (c) writing the literature review. What are the central themes and categories used by the
researchers. There is no set way to do this as it will depend on your preference for reading printed.
For academics, it is a necessary part of a research paper, setting the scene and showing how their
own work contributes to the body of. To circumvent these limitations, Pawson, Greenhalgh, Harvey,
and Walshe (2005) have proposed a new approach for synthesizing knowledge that seeks to unpack
the mechanism of how “complex interventions” work in particular contexts. Systematic reviews with
discordant findings can cause great confusion and make it difficult for decision-makers to interpret
the review-level evidence ( Moher, 2013 ).
A literature review also includes a critical evaluation of the material; this is why it is called a
literature review rather than a literature report. Inclusion and exclusion criteria must be established to
help researchers eliminate studies that are not aligned with the research questions. Clear definition of
perspectives and decisions on indirect evidence, sampling and use of existing QES help in targeting
eligibility criteria. Journal of experimental criminology, 10, 487-513. Reith, T. P. (2018). Burnout in
United States healthcare professionals: a narrative review. What are the requirements of a set of key
performance indicators (KPIs) that meet. What flaws do you believe should be addressed in your
paper. Reporting and record management Little is written on optimal use of technology. 8 A rapid
review is not a good time to learn review management software or qualitative analysis management
software. Reviews in Schools, paper on the internet, accessed 10 July 2005. Data supplement 1
Contributors HT and SM were involved in the initial conception of the review. Create an order for
your paragraph summaries (try this with just 3-4 paragraphs that relate). Adobe InDesign Design
pixel-perfect content like flyers, magazines and more with Adobe InDesign. Finally, average impact
scores increased over time with two notable growth periods. And depending on the situation, the
literature review may evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most pertinent or relevant.
Source: image.slidesharecdn.com In this case, the purpose is to evaluate the current state of. Source:
i.pinimg.com The literature review is a written overview of major writings and other sources on a
selected topic. Source: i.ytimg.com 2 what is the significance of a literature review. In these cases,
systematic reviews can use qualitative synthesis methods such as vote counting, content analysis,
classification schemes and tabulations, as an alternative approach to narratively synthesize the results
of the independent studies included in the review. Bourne, 2000, p.17). Its purported advantages
over traditional systems are seen in. You can reach out to the subject librarian for a consultation.
Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Keep on reading this complete guide to
learning how to write a literature review paper in simple steps. As you’ve been collecting and
synthesising literature, you’ll likely have started seeing some themes or patterns emerging. Rapid
Review: This type of review accelerates the systematic review process in order to produce
information in a timely manner. Learn how to write a review of literature What is a review of
literature. The Lit Review should include the most relevant related studies and demonstrate an
understanding of both key past research and practices in the subject and promising current research
and practices. In simple words, what key points will be added to the body part. Most lit reviews use
a basic introduction-body-conclusion structure; if your lit review is part of a larger paper, the
introduction and conclusion pieces may be just a few sentences while you focus most of your
attention on the body. Make sure to read the abstract to find out whether an article is relevant to
your question. Summarise your literature review by citing all the existing research literature you have
studied and the prominent features that you have highlighted. 2 what is the significance of a
literature review? Source: i.pinimg.com 1 how to write a literature review: Do not know how to
approach a task and what to focus on. Keep on reading this complete guide to learning how to write
a literature review paper in simple steps. This handout will explain what literature reviews are and
offer insights into the form and construction of literature reviews in the humanities, social sciences,
and sciences. This is crucial considering the identified need for more research exploring racial and
ethnic differences in EDs outside of the USA. 24 Given the well-documented racial and ethnic
health disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of EDs 16 and mental health conditions more
broadly, 27 a special focus will be placed on studies which have reported on the prevalence of
disordered eating and EDs, access to care and treatment experiences among minority ethnic groups.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the
Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. Di Francesco, F., Minervini, G., Siurkel, Y. et al.
Efficacy of acupuncture and laser acupuncture in temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review
and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Relevant data will be extracted using a data
charting form. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research. A literature review can be just
a simple summary of the sources, but usually contains an organizational pattern and combines both
summary and synthesis. The following provides a brief description of the content of each:
Introduction: Gives a quick idea of the topic of the literature review, such as the central theme or
organizational pattern. You can use a subheading for each theme, time period, or methodological
approach. Among the painful TMD of muscular origin, the most frequent is myofascial pain (MP).
Correct my document today Writing literature reviews can be quite challenging. If your review type
is absent from the service list on the order page, choose the “Other” option. Information systems
researchers, among others, have contributed to advancing knowledge on how to structure a
“traditional” review. You can choose the intellectual lineage you would like to be part of and whose
definitions matter most to your thinking (mostly humanities-specific, but this goes for sciences as
well). Systematic reviews with discordant findings can cause great confusion and make it difficult
for decision-makers to interpret the review-level evidence ( Moher, 2013 ). This fact is significant for
every literature review writing service, and ours isn’t an exception. You can use our template to
summarize and evaluate sources you’re thinking about using. Resolve conflicts amongst seemingly
contradictory previous studies. For each source, consider the following: What's the Author Trying to
Do. However, it’s also essential to remember examples of older studies and keep the balance between
them and the newer research. With a few paragraphs divided up with subheadings, the writing gets
higher readability as people can find the needed information in the chosen sections. Thus, while
ambient sexism accounted for some of the masculine bias, sexist language amplified the effect.
(Source: Erika Falk and Jordan Mills, “Why Sexist Language Affects Persuasion: The Role of
Homophily, Intended Audience, and Offense,” Women and Language19:2). The bibliography or
reference section of sources you've already read, such as required readings in the course syllabus, are
also excellent entry points into your own research. Source: image.slidesharecdn.com A literature
review is an objective, concise, critical summary of published research literature relevant to a topic
being researched in an article. Conclusion: Summarize the key findings you have taken from the
literature and emphasize their significance Connect it back to your primary research question How
should I organize my lit review. Synthesize Information Connect the dots between different studies.
A special focus will be placed on studies exploring prevalence, access to care and treatment
experiences. For guidance on formatting citations, please see the UNC Libraries citation tutorial.
Time constraints prevented both a longer term of patient follow-up and the recruitment of a larger
sample size. Journalists aren’t usually scholars, which means they aren’t specialists on the topics they
write about; hence newspaper stories aren’t scholarly sources. Finally, judicious use of Grading of
Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach for assessing the Confidence
of Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research assessments and of software as appropriate help to
achieve a timely and useful review product. My question is that do I put all the variables into a single
conceptual framework or each hypothesis will have it own conceptual framework.
After three months of treatment, the active therapeutic laser acupuncture is responsible for a higher
percentage of patients experiencing symptom remission. Then you look up a book written in 1968
with information on how sperm whales have been portrayed in other forms of art, such as in Alaskan
poetry, in French painting, or on whale bone, as the whale hunters in the late 19th century used to
do. These articles include content such as a brief synopsis or the key points of the film or programme
plus the critic’s own evaluation. This is where you’ll present, analyse, evaluate and synthesise the
existing research. Effect of Fabrication Technology on the Accuracy of Surgical guides for Dental-
Implant Surgery. Help us by pasting the URL of some good “literature review” for better
understanding. The fact that no study made an attempt to control for the placebo effect was a
significant flaw in the way the research for that evaluation was designed. Include each of the key
concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms. You can add to
this list if you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search. Embed Host your
publication on your website or blog with just a few clicks. There are five key steps to writing a
literature review: Search for relevant literature Evaluate sources Identify themes, debates, and gaps
Outline the structure Write your literature review A good literature review doesn’t just summarize
sources—it analyzes, synthesizes, and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of the state of
knowledge on the subject. When writing a methodology, keep in mind that you must explain your
basic research program. Stem Cells in Temporomandibular Joint Engineering: State of Art and Future
Persectives. Try to analyze patterns, turning points and key debates that have shaped the direction of
the field. Review not just what scholars are saying, but how are they saying it. Narrow your topic
There are hundreds or even thousands of articles and books on most areas of study. Then, even if you
come across great books on other topics, make sure you only get articles and books in those fields. A
flow diagram shows the number of studies identified, screened, and included or excluded at each
stage of study selection. Types of Literature Reviews It is important to think of knowledge in a
given field as consisting of three layers. When you find a useful book or article, you can check the
bibliography to find other relevant sources. A good strategy is to begin by searching the USC
Libraries Catalog for recent books about the topic and review the table of contents for chapters that
focuses on specific issues. The research team will meet regularly throughout the data extraction
process to discuss progress and further changes to the data extraction form will be made as needed
in an iterative process. The carefully examined examples can be like a treasure with multiple tips. We
will also aim to identify the types of treatment that have been used in minority ethnic populations.
Uncover connections and relationships among diverse research pieces to construct a cohesive
narrative within your literature review. Qualitative versus quantitative research Empirical versus
theoretical scholarship Divide the research by sociological, historical, or cultural sources Theoretical:
In many humanities articles, the literature review is the foundation for the theoretical framework.
Their literature review will then be a summary of the fieldwork methodologies used by different
studies. To maintain track of the scholarly articles and sources, use a bibliography or reference
management software like EndNote or Zotero. This allows you to organize your thoughts and
discoveries into a logical totality. This summarizes the concluding thoughts derived from the
testimonials. Usually, it’s unnecessary, but if an abstract is mentioned in the requirements, consider
adding it to the working plan.
Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the
field. Use of templates and frameworks in study selection and data extraction can be accompanied
by quality assurance procedures targeting areas of likely weakness. Funding The authors have not
declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-
for-profit sectors. Let’s get to it! What should I do before writing the literature review. With my
undergraduate research students (who tend to conduct small-scale qualitative studies ), I encourage
them to conduct a narrative literature review whereby they can identify key themes in the literature.
In the absence of validated risk of bias tools for qualitative studies, the team should choose a tool
according to Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group (CQIMG) guidance together
with expediency (according to ease of use, prior familiarity, etc) ( table 2, item R15). 41 In
comparison to the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist which was never designed for use in
synthesis, 42 the Cochrane qualitative tool is similarly easy to use and was designed for QES use.
From proactively monitoring and fixing your system remotely to enabling you to reset your own
system easily, we have you covered. Telescopic overdenture on natural teeth: prosthetic rehabilitation
on (OFD) syndromic patient and a review on available literature. Brindley, Geoff (2001).
Assessment. In R. Carter and D. Nunan (Eds). The. A randomized clinical trial comparing the
efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and laser acupuncture therapy (LAT) in patients with
temporomandibular disorders. While 75% of studies disclosed all outcome data, and 100% of the
included trials adequately left out bias in the selection of the reported outcomes, only 20% of studies
adequately left out performance bias. Sejajar dengan perkembangan internet, media sosial kini
menjadi aplikasi internet yang kian. A literature review also includes a critical evaluation of the
material; this is why it is called a literature review rather than a literature report. If you begin to see
the same researchers cited again and again, then this is often an indication that no new ideas have
been generated to address the research problem. Source: Overview: This systematic review included
72 studies of food naturalness to explore trends in the literature about its importance for consumers.
What are the key concepts and how are they defined. These are frequently used in Lit Reviews since
they offer concise, up-to-date information. Is it required to evaluate your sources in a literature
review. This may necessitate a close examination of the citation. Results indicate that the majority of
systematic reviews in this particular area suffer from important methodological flaws and biases that
impair their internal validity and limit their usefulness for clinical and decision-making purposes.
When doing and writing a literature review, it is good practice to: summarise and analyse previous
research and theories; identify areas of controversy and contested claims; highlight any gaps that
may exist in research to date. My question is that do I put all the variables into a single conceptual
framework or each hypothesis will have it own conceptual framework. Systematic reviews with
discordant findings can cause great confusion and make it difficult for decision-makers to interpret
the review-level evidence ( Moher, 2013 ). The authors conducted a comprehensive search on
multiple databases to identify eligible reviews and subsequently used a validated instrument to
conduct an in-depth quality appraisal. The aim of this study is to perform an analysis that evaluates
the quality of the studies and the effectiveness of acupuncture and laser acupuncture treatments in
relieving painful TMD symptomatology. Will G Hopkins PhD. Division of Physiology and College of
Bodily Schooling, College of Otago, Dunedin 9001, New Zealand. 1. Introduction. To not be
confused with a e book evaluate, a literature evaluate surveys scholarly articles, books and different
sources (e.g. dissertations, convention Example of literature critiques from Helen M. It can be
undertaken as stand-alone projects in their own right, or as a precursor to a systematic review.
Question 6: do ED treatment experiences differ across ethnic groups. It may be helpful to use a
matrix, table, or idea map to visually depict and analyze the relationships between the different
sources.Analyze the literature you have. An instance of a pupil literature evaluate in psychology and
lecturer’s feedback is right here. “” Guideline collection is coordinated by Helen Mongan-Rallis of
the Schooling Division on the College of Minnesota Duluth.