Title: Mastering the Art of Writing a Literature Review

Crafting a literature review is a formidable task that often leaves students and researchers feeling
overwhelmed. The meticulous process of gathering, synthesizing, and analyzing existing literature
can be daunting, requiring both time and expertise. However, with the right approach and guidance,
this crucial component of academic writing can be conquered.

To embark on the journey of writing a literature review, one must first understand its significance. A
literature review serves as a comprehensive survey of scholarly sources relevant to a particular topic
or research question. It not only demonstrates the writer's familiarity with existing literature but also
provides a framework for understanding the current state of knowledge in the field.

One of the primary challenges in writing a literature review is the sheer volume of available
literature. Navigating through numerous articles, books, and other scholarly sources requires a
discerning eye and a systematic approach. Moreover, synthesizing diverse perspectives and findings
into a coherent narrative demands critical thinking and analytical skills.

Another hurdle faced by many is the organization and structure of the literature review. Determining
the most effective way to present the reviewed literature can be perplexing, as it requires balancing
chronological, thematic, or methodological approaches based on the research context. Moreover,
ensuring smooth transitions between different sections and maintaining a logical flow is essential for
clarity and coherence.

Additionally, writing a literature review necessitates impeccable writing skills and attention to detail.
From crafting concise summaries of individual sources to analyzing their relevance to the research
question, every aspect of the review demands precision and clarity. Furthermore, adhering to citation
styles and formatting guidelines adds another layer of complexity to the writing process.

Given the challenges associated with writing a literature review, seeking professional assistance can
be a wise decision. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers expert guidance and support to students and
researchers grappling with this task. With a team of experienced writers and researchers, ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ provides customized literature reviews tailored to the specific requirements of each
client. By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can alleviate the stress and
uncertainty associated with this daunting task, allowing you to focus on other aspects of your
academic journey.

In conclusion, writing a literature review is undoubtedly a challenging endeavor, requiring patience,

perseverance, and skill. However, with the right approach and support, mastering this art is within
reach. By leveraging the expertise of services like ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can navigate the
complexities of literature review writing with confidence and precision, ensuring the success of your
academic endeavors.
When writing a journal article, literature review, convention paper, or any other academic document,
authors must include in-text citations whenever they refer to, summarize, paraphrase, or quote from
another source. Given this, the purpose of a literature review is to: Place each work in the context of
its contribution to understanding the research problem being studied. Does the research use
established frameworks or take an innovative approach. In other words, after grappling with the
literature you’ll have an opinion about what the trends and concerns are in the field as well as what’s
lacking. Even when paraphrasing an author’s work, you still must provide a citation to that work. V.
Common Mistakes to Avoid These are the most common mistakes made in reviewing social science
research literature. This approach helps highlight ethical issues which you should be aware of and
consider as you go through your own study. Let’s get to it! What should I do before writing the
literature review. Writing the Literature review What is a literature review. The literature on writing
literature reviews is generally useful in three areas: The icse paper was followed up by an article in
ieee software and a paper at metrics05. 2 writing a systematic literature review. TemplateLab
templatelab.com ?? How To Do A Review Article. That means that you can group the A Guide to
Writing the Dissertation Literature Review Justus J. The Creative Commons Public Domain
Dedication waiver ( ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a
credit line to the data. Be selective Select only the most important points in each source to highlight
in the review. Work backwards from the assignment’s final deadline and assign realistic deadlines to
each stage. Sample 1 (PDF) A brief literature review within a political scientists’ National Science
Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship grant Sample 2 (PDF) A several-page literature review at
the beginning of a published, academic article about philosophy Sample 3 (PDF) A brief literature
review at the beginning of a published, academic article about photochemistry Academic and
Professional Writing This is an accordion element with a series of buttons that open and close related
content panels. Thus, while ambient sexism accounted for some of the masculine bias, sexist
language amplified the effect. (Source: Erika Falk and Jordan Mills, “Why Sexist Language Affects
Persuasion: The Role of Homophily, Intended Audience, and Offense,” Women and Language19:2).
To be a responsible scholar by giving credit to other researchers and acknowledging their ideas. All
RCTs of acupuncture for TMD were searched without language restrictions. International journal of
clinical practice, 69 (11), 1257-1267. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to
reuse the content in many different ways. Protocol for a scoping review to identify research
reporting on eating The present scoping review aims to examine the extent, range and nature of
research activity into disordered eating and EDs in the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand
providing a comprehensive overview of the existing literature. To ensure the quality of the scoping
review, the development and reporting of this protocol followed the Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines.
32 The protocol for this scoping review is also registered on OSF ( ). This is a great example of
profound research work. Review not just what scholars are saying, but how are they saying it.
Source: Overview: This systematic review included 72 studies of food naturalness to explore trends
in the literature about its importance for consumers. Often, the literature review is where you can
establish your research as filling a particular gap or as relevant in a particular way. Further Readings
Generative AI and Writing USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides Bibliography A literature
review surveys prior research published in books, scholarly articles, and any other sources relevant to
a particular issue, area of research, or theory, and by so doing, provides a description, summary, and
critical evaluation of these works in relation to the research problem being investigated. What are the
most important topics, subtopics, etc., that your review needs to include. In this way, critical reviews
attempt to constructively inform other scholars about the weaknesses of prior research and strengthen
knowledge development by giving focus and direction to studies for further improvement (
Kirkevold, 1997 ). Reporting of the results will follow PRISMA ScR guidelines. 32 Ethics and
dissemination As scoping reviews involve the methodological examination and integration of existing
literature and resources, ethical approval is not required.
When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice. Evaluating your sources and
choosing those that are relevant to your topic can be difficult. Findings from eight rct s involving
6,615 participants were pooled into meta-analyses to calculate the magnitude of effects that mobile
text message reminders have on the rate of attendance at healthcare appointments compared to no
reminders and phone call reminders. Literature reviews provide the reader with a bibliographic
history of the scholarly research in any given field of study. That means that you can group the
Writing guide for a perfect literature review Essay Sample. Critical thinking As with other forms of
academic writing, your literature review needs to demonstrate good academic practice by following
the Code of Student Conduct and acknowledging the work of others through citing and referencing
your sources. This step will help you work out the structure of your literature review and (if
applicable) show how your own research will contribute to existing knowledge. A Guide to Writing
the Dissertation Literature Review Justus J. A scoping review was chosen as the most appropriate
methodology. After the introduction, it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly
to your theoretical framework or methodology. Pick one of these themes to focus the organization of
your review. For example, a sociologist might centre their research around critiquing specific
fieldwork practices. This makes you wonder about American whaling methods during the time
portrayed in Moby Dick, so you find some academic articles published in the last five years on how
accurately Herman Melville portrayed the whaling scene in his novel. Finally, judicious use of
Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach for assessing the
Confidence of Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research assessments and of software as
appropriate help to achieve a timely and useful review product. If possible, give your own ideas
about why and how certain developments came to happen. Sejajar dengan perkembangan internet,
media sosial kini menjadi aplikasi internet yang kian. The CQIMG endorses three types of synthesis;
thematic synthesis, framework synthesis and meta-ethnography ( box 1 ). 43 44 Rapid QES favour
descriptive thematic synthesis 45 or framework synthesis, 46 47 except when theory generation
(meta-ethnography 48 49 or analytical thematic synthesis) is a priority ( table 2, item R17). Effects
of CB2 receptor modulation on macrophage polarization in Pediatric Celiac Disease. We revise these
tips periodically and welcome feedback. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science
Research Imagination. Then this Historical Literature Review Example voices your familiarity with
the topic. But if you find yourself wanting to put in more quotes, check with your instructor. Write in
well-structured paragraphs: use transitions and topic sentences to draw connections, comparisons and
contrasts. Whether they are writing a short review as part of an Honours assignment, or a full-length
chapter in a PhD thesis, students consistently find it a struggle to turn the mass of diverse material
found in a literature search into a well-organised critical discussion. Stage 1: identifying the research
questions The first stage of a scoping review is to develop research questions which are informed by
the purpose and objectives of the scoping review. 31 Based on the aforementioned objectives of this
scoping review, we have formulated six research questions. If you choose this strategy, be careful to
avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order. Any opinions or recommendations discussed
are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. All studies that had multiple
therapeutic interventions applied in the study groups or those that did not fulfill the criteria of a RCT
were excluded. The Fig. 1 shows the methodologic development of the review and the studies
excluded. The Literature Review: A Few Tips On Conducting It. Important to remember: You DO
NOT need to add an in-text citation after EVERY sentence of your paragraph.
Effects of CB2 receptor modulation on macrophage polarization in Pediatric Celiac Disease.
Consider organization You’ve got a focus, and you’ve stated it clearly and directly. Remember, your
focus should usually be on the topic you are reviewing, rather than on individual writers. Check out
Scribbr’s professional proofreading services. Historical literature reviews focus on examining
research throughout a period of time, often starting with the first time an issue, concept, theory,
phenomena emerged in the literature, then tracing its evolution within the scholarship of a discipline.
It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-
reviewed. Literature search -- finding materials relevant to the subject being explored. 3. Data
evaluation -- determining which literature makes a significant contribution to the understanding of
the topic. 4. Analysis and interpretation -- discussing the findings and conclusions of pertinent
literature. For instance, in the humanities, authors might include more overt argumentation and
interpretation of source material in their literature reviews, whereas in the sciences, authors are more
likely to report study designs and results in their literature reviews; these differences reflect these
disciplines’ purposes and conventions in scholarship. A literature or narrative review is a
comprehensive review and analysis of the published literature on a specific topic or research
question. The annotations inform the reader of the relevance, accuracy and quality of the sources
cited. Following is the most recent recording of the workshop, Conducting a Literature Review. This
site is one thing that is required on the internet, someone with a little originality. Now consider some
typical ways of organizing the sources into a review: Chronological: If your review follows the
chronological method, you could write about the materials above according to when they were
published. This article summarizes some pivotal information on how to write a high-quality
dissertation literature review. When you write a dissertation or thesis, you will have to conduct a
literature review to situate your research within existing knowledge. Thus, while ambient sexism
accounted for some of the masculine bias, sexist language amplified the effect. (Source: Erika Falk
and Jordan Mills, “Why Sexist Language Affects Persuasion: The Role of Homophily, Intended
Audience, and Offense,” Women and Language19:2). We’ve written a step-by-step guide that you
can follow below. Often, the literature review is where you can establish your research as filling a
particular gap or as relevant in a particular way. For example: Look at what results have emerged in
qualitative versus quantitative research Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical
versus theoretical scholarship Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources
Theoretical A literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework. For the
introduction (and discussion) of a research paper, masters thesis or dissertation 3. Such logic is
appropriate for fields like medicine and education where findings of randomized controlled trials can
be aggregated to see whether a new treatment or intervention does improve outcomes. Types of
Literature Reviews It is important to think of knowledge in a given field as consisting of three
layers. The entire assignment was quite a great challenge for me, but not for the writer at GetEssay.
Relevant data will be extracted using a data charting form. Whether they are writing a short review
as part of an Honours assignment, or a full-length chapter in a PhD thesis, students consistently find
it a struggle to turn the mass of diverse material found in a literature search into a well-organised
critical discussion. Some people do this in a word document, others use index cards so they can
shuffle them. How does the publication contribute to your understanding of the topic. Please check
course or programme information and materials provided by teaching staff, including your project
supervisor, for subject-specific guidance. In this section, you should emphasise the research that is
especially important to your research questions and highlight the gaps that exist in the literature.
What are the central themes and categories used by the researchers.
Hearing that professor’s task is to deliver a literature review, students imagine sharing their
viewpoints about favorite books and authors. It can be overwhelming getting into the literature of a
field of study. Usually a literature review forms a section or part of a dissertation, research project or
long essay. This may help to explain why, in addition to the potential placebo effect of acupuncture,
there is also a real effect based on the neurophysiology of the needling. The body section of your
literature review can be organised by chronology, theme or methodology. What are the key concepts
and how are they defined. Organizing the literature review by topic, theme, or idea is best suited for
a paper that addresses an interdisciplinary research question. I do not think I’ve read through
something like this before. Your professor will probably not expect you to read everything that's
available about the topic, but you'll make the act of reviewing easier if you first limit scope of the
research problem. A literature review, like a term paper, is usually organized around ideas, not the
sources themselves as an annotated bibliography would be organized. A service of the National
Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. Competing interests AB is co-convenor of the
Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group. If the literature review is part of your
dissertation or thesis, reiterate how your research addresses gaps and contributes new knowledge, or
discuss how you have drawn on existing theories and methods to build a framework for your
research. Consider joining the Center for Cancer Research (CCR) at the National Cancer Institute
Bethesda, Maryland (US) NIH National Cancer Institute (NCI) Postdoctoral Fellow (PhD) Houston,
Texas (US) Baylor College of Medicine (BCM) Professional-Track Faculty Positions Available. Data
supplement 1 Contributors All authors (AB, IS, JN, CH, FC) have made substantial contributions to
the conception and design of the guidance document. When doing and writing a literature review, it
is good practice to: summarise and analyse previous research and theories; identify areas of
controversy and contested claims; highlight any gaps that may exist in research to date. Use words
like 'because,' 'through,' 'by,' or 'due to' and answer 'how' and 'why' questions to extend your thesis
statement. It begins with a Writing guide for a perfect literature review Essay Sample. Theoretical
Review The purpose of this form is to examine the corpus of theory that has accumulated in regard
to an issue, concept, theory, phenomena. As a result, we can say that there isn’t much support for
using acupuncture to treat TMD symptoms. It is not possible to draw exhaustive conclusions. You
can see an example of where literature is dealt with in the annotated humanities example on the
Thesis structure page. To ensure the search is as comprehensive as possible, backwards citation
chaining of included studies will be used to identify any additional studies of relevance. It’s a simple
endeavour; you just dust off your books, settle down in your chair coffee in hand, ready to jot down
quick summaries of your readings as you skim through the pages. Several search terms relating to phr
s were used during this process. You can use a subheading for each theme, time period, or
methodological approach. The population’s age categories are also a drawback because they are
extremely diverse and do not take age into account as a confounding factor. How can the existing
methodologies inform my own methodology? 3: The Conclusion Section Once you’ve completed the
body section of your literature review using one of the structural approaches we discussed above,
you’ll need to “wrap up” your literature review and pull all the pieces together to set the direction for
the rest of your dissertation or thesis. If necessary, as we become more familiar with the existing
literature our research questions will be refined and modified accordingly. International journal of
clinical practice, 69 (11), 1257-1267. Five key themes were found in the literature: poor
communication can lead to various negative outcomes, discontinuity of care, compromise of patient
safety, patient dissatisfaction, and inefficient use of resources.