You are on page 1of 1

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES vs. LIM TIAN TENG SONS and CO., INC.

,
G.R. L-21731, March 31, 1966

Facts:
Lim Tian Teng Sons & Co is engaged in the Exportation of Copra, with its
principal office at Cebu City. Before exporting the copra, they weighed before shipment.
They collect 95% of the amount and the balance shall be subject to final liquidation and
adjustment. Lim Tian Teng Son & co. filed its income tax return for the year 1952. They
filed a loss of income as of December 31, 1951. The CIR eliminated the beginning
inventory for 1952 and considered income for 1951. Hence, disallowed. CIR assesses a
deficiency income tax of 10,074.00 and 50% surcharge. Lim Tian Teng Sons & co.
Requested for reinvestigation for 1952 income tax liability. However, CIR they did not
reply instead the case was referred to the Solicitor General for Collection and demand
for such tax liabilities. However, later on, the CIR replied that reinvestigation be granted
upon execution of a waiver of the statute limitation and even extended the compliance
herewith. Lim Tian Teng Sons & Co. failed to file a waiver of the statute of limitation.
Hence CIR filed an action before CFI of Cebu for collection of deficiency tax. The lower
court ruled that the income tax assessment is valid final and executory and Lim & co.
ordered to pay with interest. CIR moved for reconsideration since there was no 5%
surcharge imposed. Hence, denied since taxpayers were already assessed 50%
surcharge. On appeal, Lim assailed the jurisdiction of the lower court and questioned
the legality of the assessment tax liability since the Lower court has no jurisdiction over
the case to entertain since the case had not yet issued a final decision on the request
for reinvestigation.

Issue:
Whether or not the court erred in considering the assessment notice was final
and executory

Held:
No. The collection of such tax may begun without assessment. CIR is authorize
to collect the delinquent before he can collect the tax either by distraint and levy or by
judicial action or both simultaneously. The only requisite before CIR can collect the tax
is that he must first assess the same within the time fixed by law And in case of false or
fraudulent return with intent to evade the tax or failure to file a return. The legislative
policy to allow the collector of internal revenue much latitude in the speedy and prompt
collection of taxes. Republic act 1125 states that no appeal taken to the court of tax
appeals for the decision of the collector of Internal Revenue without the taxpayer to
deposit the amount claimed or to file surety bond not more than the double the amount
with the court. Taxpayer failure to appeal to Court of tax appeals reckoning the 30 days
made the assessment in question final executory and demandable.

You might also like