How did the author show contrast in Young and Dyslexic?

Engaging dialogues and contrast are further explored in the succeeding lines, “Good people could do
one-third more good…” versus the response of the teacher, “…stupid boy. Bad people would do one-
third more bad," this is a clear reflection of their difference in ideas and opposition towards one
another. The juxtaposition of seeking help and being subtly mocked by a teacher adds depth to the
narrative; it emphasizes the need for more compassionate and supportive approaches. Reading that
many people take for granted was extremely difficult and “hard work” for him.

Accessibility is something rare in the times Zephaniah lived in. Hostile education system, societal biases,
and racial inequalities were common denominators in his past and he feels that he has perhaps been
lucky by contrasting his experience to others stating “opportunities opened for me and they missed
theirs.” The text takes a candid turn as the author recounts his expulsion from schools and brushes with
the law; the mention of "Borstal" as a youth detention system provides insight into the prevailing
environment of Benjamin’s upbringing and challenges the notion of “trouble” being a defining
characteristic of dyslexic individuals.

The author's journey is a contrast against the expectations imposed on them due to their background,
reinforcing their defiance of societal norms and proving that potential can flourish despite adverse
circumstances. It examines the life choices of dyslexic individuals and non-dyslexics, utilizing tri-colon
once more to reinforce the notion that dyslexia does not define one’s future.

How did the author show contrast in Disabled?

The title itself is a contrast to a typical image of a soldier, who is known to be of excellent physical
health, hence indicates the harrowing effects of the war. It further introduces the new identity of this
veteran as if he has just been reduced to someone who is disabled, a way the he sees himself as well as
those people around him.

The poem implicitly condemns the idea initially published during the early stages of the conflict, that
war is an exciting and heroic escapade and patriotic act rather than a harsh, horrifying ordeal. A
juxtaposition on the society’s disillusionment with war is both dangerous and extremely hypocritical.

The constant juxtaposition between his past and present self is explored throughout the poem, with
three personas that have different perspectives and mentalities. The third persona: the disabled soldier,
finds himself thinking about his life before the war. He mourns the life and youth he lost, stolen by the
war from him as he spends the rest of his days in isolation and in that sick institution. The war that the
ex-soldier participated in, left unwanted scars that made the young man disabled forever, a complete
contrast to his vigorous youth.

How did the writer show contrast in “Out, Out?”

The peacefulness and beauty of the surroundings presented by Frost contrast with the violence of
the saw. The harsh sounds to describe the saw are restraining with the gentle sibilance to portray
the natural setting, “sweet-scented stuff” in rural Vermont.
How did the writer show contrast in Explorers or boys messing about?

Morris criticises the incident as having "ended in farce," which juxtaposes “expedition, casting doubt
and underlying tone critical on the men's actions and the outcome. Despite this, the first several
paragraphs are purely factual details, opening with a complex sentence and outlined like a report: "The
men were plucked from the icy water by a Chilean naval ship after a nine-hour rescue…” However, the
choice of the verb "plucked" adds a subjective perspective on the manner of their rescue, revealing a
lack of impartiality in journalism and provides the reader with how lightweight the two explorers are.
The scale and the length of time wherein the naval rescue ship spent “nine hours” highlights how
irresponsible the men were to put themselves at risk and the extent of effort needed to rescue them
from this tragedy.

The writer's use of contrasting terms such as "expedition" and "farce" implicitly suggests that this flight
should never have taken place, conveying a critical undertone towards these "boys." Morris' reference
to the explorers' ages, "42 and 40," implies an expectation of maturity and responsible decision-making
due to their advanced years, which is a complete contrast with their actions, suggesting that the incident
could have been avoided.