India has adopted a cautious approach to patenting AI-related innovations under its patent system. While the Indian Patents Act originally excluded the patentability of computer programs per se, AI systems are now effectively classified as computer-related inventions in India. For an AI invention to be patentable, it must demonstrate a "technical effect" or "technical contribution" and meet the standard requirements of novelty, inventive step, and industrial application. However, the Indian Patent Office has yet to provide specific examination guidelines for AI inventions, relying instead on recent court decisions, which represents a lacuna in India's ability to adequately protect AI-related innovation under its current patent system.
Original Description:
Original Title
Adequacy of Patent System in India for Protecting AI Related Innovation
India has adopted a cautious approach to patenting AI-related innovations under its patent system. While the Indian Patents Act originally excluded the patentability of computer programs per se, AI systems are now effectively classified as computer-related inventions in India. For an AI invention to be patentable, it must demonstrate a "technical effect" or "technical contribution" and meet the standard requirements of novelty, inventive step, and industrial application. However, the Indian Patent Office has yet to provide specific examination guidelines for AI inventions, relying instead on recent court decisions, which represents a lacuna in India's ability to adequately protect AI-related innovation under its current patent system.
India has adopted a cautious approach to patenting AI-related innovations under its patent system. While the Indian Patents Act originally excluded the patentability of computer programs per se, AI systems are now effectively classified as computer-related inventions in India. For an AI invention to be patentable, it must demonstrate a "technical effect" or "technical contribution" and meet the standard requirements of novelty, inventive step, and industrial application. However, the Indian Patent Office has yet to provide specific examination guidelines for AI inventions, relying instead on recent court decisions, which represents a lacuna in India's ability to adequately protect AI-related innovation under its current patent system.
Adequacy of patent system in India for protecting AI related innovation
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a game-changing technology poised to reshape
numerous sectors, including healthcare, finance, transportation, and manufacturing. As AI's progress continues, the matter of patenting innovations related to AI has the global attention. Different countries tackle this matter based on their legal systems, economic goals, and strategic considerations. In India's case, the nation has adopted a cautions and well-balanced stance when it comes to patenting AI-related innovations. The question arises whether the AI related innovations are patentable in India or not because interpretation of Section 3(k) of the Patents Act, 1970, which excludes the patentability of computer programmes per se. To answer this, AI systems use complex systems of mathematical models and/or algorithms to achieve their intended results and are effectively classified as Computer Related Inventions (CRIs) in India and treated as such by the Indian Patent Office (IPO). The Delhi High Court, in its 2019 decision in Ferid Allani v. Union of India and Ors, It held that “technical effect” or “technical contribution” must be determined to decide patentability of CRIs, and that an invention merely being implemented using a computer program is no bar to its patentability. Like any other invention, a CRI must fulfil the requirements of novelty, inventive step, and industrial application to be patentable under the Indian Patents Act, 1970. In India, the hurdles most likely to arise for AI inventions relate to subject matter patentability and inventive step, as well as sufficiency of disclosure. A review of recent decisions shows that Controllers are now examining CRI applications for technical effect or contribution.The lacuna present in the current patent system is that Indian Patent Office is yet to provide specific guidelines on the issue while the countries around the world are having the proper guidelines for example Japanese Patent Office has issued the guidelines related to examining the AI related innovation in the year 2021. And currently the examiners are relying on the Delhi Court decision in Ferid Allani.