fh (re. a 'ppeared in BCA Part | Exam, 2046 COR ucteg >» Punjabi University, Patiala, He w, 4 tegu ar student of Lincoln College whic (© Punjabi University, 10-2005 during course of examinati n Mr. A was caught by F' Certair material ‘Three Printed pag NaS a\ cordingly scized by Flying Sq WAS Liven printed notice of using unfair Page of the notice forming part of ansy t his own Signat ire made endorsement *Caught by | “uy Flying Squad’ on the 1" page of the olice which was attesied by Chief Inv igilStGM | xamination Superintendend Qn the answerS~ k lo endorsement “Caught by Universit Flying Squad” the printed Pages both sides pave Was tiade under sigrature of all concemed authorities on the i# ‘ch is meant fe “own the marks obtained by examinee, All tselt) was serve i uote sing aso ethic atinee No'gancelled & why he not be debarred ane in University her gente notice. he filed a Writ Petition under A a 4 8 Argue on behalf of both the Parties, Issucs:- I 1. Whether this Writ Petition is maintainal 2. Whether mere Possession of unautho1 ‘means or not? 3. Whether the cancellation of exam of camm. 2 % 14, . MOOT PROPOSITION , ‘Awoman named Meera, aged about 25 years, working in Delhi, was getting engaged to an happened to be employed in Delhi. Their engagement ceremony was to be in the hous: Jalandhar Cantt on 4th December 2023. OOP, who also 2 Of Meera at hsher child, (aged :3. years) ‘Accordingly, on ‘Ist December 2025, Meera along. wit years) boarded Delhidalendhar Passenger Train at about 530 pm. from Delhi Northern Railway Station t0 90 to her home. They had boarded the ladies’ coach (S2), where other Passengers were also present When the train reached Ludhiana, around 10:05 PM, all other passengers in the ladies’ coach had disembarked and therefore, Meera panicked at the said instance and alighted the train along with tree and hurriedly entered'the ladies'.coach attached succeeding the last General Coach (58). The tin reached Phagwara Railway Station at 10:40 pm where it halted for some time. ‘Aman, named, Vikram aged 28 years who was also going back home, noticed a girl like Me: alone in the ladies' coach. As soon as the train had left Phagwara Railway Station and m. Jalandhar Cantt, Vikram entered the ladies’ coach. er, who was loved towards Tony, Tenzin, and Tushar who-were also travelling fn the general coach Which is behind'the ladies ‘coach (59).Tony and Tenzin alleged that after the train started from Phagwara they heard the cries of the women and child and wanted to pull the alarm chain to stop the train but they were dissuaded by amiddle-sgea man named, Mahesh who was standing atthe door of the compartment, stated thathe sawe gi fats from the train and that in these circumstances they should not take the matter any further as ‘the same ‘may drag allof them to Police and the Court. Another passenger, Tushar, said that he heard multiple bang noises from the other coach. However, when the train reached Jalandhar Cantt Railway Station, Tony and Tenzin rushed to Balraj Singh, the guard 6f the train, and complained about the incident which triggered an investigation, to, Meera, her child, and the accused. Eventually, Meera was found in a badly injured condition ying by the side ofthe Rallway track. The child who was crying inconsolably was found in the same ladies’ coach ang the accused was also apprehended soon thereafter. Meera was taken to the local, Hospital whereafter she was taken to the Mé Jalandhar where she Succumibed to her injuries on 2nd December 2023. As per report, thé cause of death was multiple injuries on the head incurfed asa consequence of her head hitting ‘the railway track:It was also disclosed that the extracts of DNA from the ‘vaginal smear matched withthe DNA of the accused. Some clotting and nail marks were there on the victim's body with injuries on her private parts. ledical College Hospital, the medical examination During the medical Exarpination of the accused Vikram, it was found [that the accused hi ad also some clotting around bis neck with nail scratch marks on his back, During tHe inyestigation, the police got to know that the accused was none other than Vikram who was the former husband of the deceased. It was further confirmed from the investigation that they got divorced after.the accident which happened 2 years ago in which the accused lost his right arm, There were a lot of rumours and speculations regarding the split up of the deceased and her husband Vikrem The deceased was disturbed by this and she also mentioned this to her three friends, Shruti, Surbhi, ana Shraddha. The divorce was the point of discussion between their common friends. It was said that Mees id this because she was not satisfied due to Vikram disability and Vikram also shared the same c ‘The police recovered the mobile phone of the deceased from Ramesh Yadav who bought it from Sur) ‘who is a distant friend of Anoop, Its alleged that the accused sold it to Suraj ust after the inciden also confessed to the Police that he ransacked Meera's belongings and went away from the place with her mobile phone. Meanwhile, the mother of the deceased informed the police that the chilethas been scared of Anoep and Fits crying every time he sees him. He also points towards Anoop every now and now ans ‘Mom...Ano." and starts crying again. investigation revealed that Anoop acted possessive when It came to Meera when she shared.er respect and care for Vikram on multiple occasions, which she stillhad even after a mutual divorce. AnceP w= "ely accommodating towards the child, a saying in their families. + : sca fences under itis in $hese circumstances that the accused was charged with the commission of off ; s Court, Sends $78,394; and 397 of Indian Penal Code(IPC). The gase is listed for trial before Session Jalandhar on 22nd March 2024,sues of the Case + Whether the acetiied will ba held llable under section 302 of IPC’? * Whether the acetised will be hold lable under section 376 of IPC? * Whether the accused commit tho ottencos undor sections 394 and 397, of IPC? + Whothar the statement of the Child ls admissible? Jeams have the Ilberty to frame any other sub-issue: Disclaimer ‘ * The facts stated In the moot proposition ara fictitious and have been drafted solely for the moot court compotitian. + The names, locations, dates used and the situation described in the proposition have no resemblance to any person alive or dead, or any event. + No real incident can be attached to anything contained in this proposition. + The proposition doesn't int nt ter hurtthe feglings of any, pe sn or any section of society. 5 AAs re aa Re 3 bi i eda