Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
This chapter dwells on the philosophical thoughts on education of John Locke, Herbert
Spencer, John Dewey, George Counts, Theodore Brameld and Paulo Freire. This discussion is
focused on their opinions of what should be taught for the socialization of the individual and
how these should be taught.
Here is a summary on the views of the philosophers enumerated above, in terms of what
should be taught to the children and how it should be taught. Read through the notes and answer
the learning activity at the end.
Introduction
This module on Historical Foundation of Education is meant to help you, preservice
teachers, to understand how education in the Philippines and in the world has changed
throughout the years and how it can continue to change now and in the future.
Let us begin this module with the quote from John Dewey:
“When a school introduces and trains each child of society into
membership within such a little community, saturating him with the
spirit of service, and providing him with the instruments of effective
self-direction, we shall have the deepest and best guaranty of a
larger society which is worthy, lovely and harmonious.”
Post-colonial Philippines
Education aimed at the full realization of the democratic ideals and way of life
The Civil Service Eligibility of teachers was made permanent pursuant to RA 1079 in
June 15, 1954
A daily flag ceremony was made compulsory in all schools including the singing of the
National Anthem pursuant to RA 1265 approved on June 11, 1955
Curricular offerings in all schools, the life, the works and writings of Jose Rizal
esepecially the Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo shall be included in all levels
Elementary education was nationalized and matriculation fees were abolished
Magna Carta for Teachers was passed into law by virtue of RA 4670
The fundamental aims of education in the 1973 Constitution are: foster love of country;
teach the duties of citizenship; develop moral character; self- discipline; and scientific,
technological and vocational efficiency
Other development
Integration of values in all learning areas
Emphasis on mastery learning
YDT (Youth Development Training) and CAT (Citizen’s Arm Training) introduced as
new courses
Media Instruction – Bilingual Education Policy: Mandates the use of English and Filipino
separately as media of instruction in schools
Education Act of 1982 – created the Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports (MECS)
NCEE (National College Entrance Examination was introduced
Executive Order No. 117 – President Corazon C. Aquino renamed MECS into DECS
( Department of Education, Culture and Sports) in 1987
Creation of the Board for Professional Teachers composed of 5 under PRC
Replacement of PBET (Professional Board Examination for Teachers) by LET
(Licensure Examination for Teachers)
Transfer of Authority of administering the LET from CSC (Civil Service Commission)
and DECS to the Bureau of Professional Techers under PRC
Trifocalization of Education System
The Trifocal education system refocused DECS’ mandate to basic education which
covers elementary, secondary and nonformal education, including culture and Sports.
TESDA (Technical Education Skills Development Authority) now administers the post-
secondary,middle-level manpower training and development (RA 7796 – Technical
Education and Skills Development Act of 1994)
CHED (Commission on Higher Education0 is responsible for higher education (RA 7722
– Higher Education Act of 1994)
In August 2001, Republic Act 9155 (Governance of Basic Education Act) was passed
transforming the name Department of Education, Culture and Sports (DECS) to the
Department of Education (DEpEd)and redefining the roles field offices (regional,
division, district, and schools). RA 9155 provide the overall framework for (i) school
head empowerment by strengthening their leadership roles; and, (ii) school-based
management within the context of transparency and local accountability. The goal of
basic education is to provide the school age population and young adults with skills,
knowledge and values to become caring, self-reliant, productive and patriotic citizens.
Values education is offered as a separate subject and integrated in all subject areas in the
New Secondary Education Curriculum
RA 10157, January 20, 2012 – Kindergarten Act, an act institutionalizing the
kindergarted education into the basic education system
K to 12 Program (RA 10533) – The k\K to 12 program covers kindergarten and 12 years
of basic education (six years of primary education, 4 years of junior high school and 2
years of senior high school) to provide sufficient time for mastery of concepts and skills,
develop life long learners, and prepare graduates for tertiary education, middle level
skills development, employment and entrepreneurship.
At present, the DepEd Vision, Mission and core values and the national vision and
mission of the Commission on Higher Education “highlights” and summarizes the goals of
Philippine Education.
MODULE III – SOCIAL SCIENCE THEORIES AND
THEIR IMPLICATIONS TO EDUCATION
Introduction
Sociologists today employ three primary theoretical perspectives: functionalist, conflict
and symbolic interactionist. These perspectives explain how society influences people and how
people influence the society. Each perspective uniquely conceptualizes society, social forces and
human behavior.
The different components/parts of the society must coordinate and collaborate for society
to function well. Just like in the stories you have read, if one part of the human body does not
function well, the whole body is affected. In the same way, when one component of the society
does not do its part, society will not function well. The overall health of the organism and the
society depends upon the health of each structure or part.
The functionalist theory of education focuses on how education serves the need of society
through the development of skills encouraging social cohesion. The role of schools is to prepare
students for participation in the institutions of society. Education is concerned with the
transmission of core values for social control. Education is concerned with socializing people by
bringing together people from different backgrounds. The functionalist theory is focused on
social stability and solidarity. Functionalists see education as a beneficial contribution to an
ordered society.
Functionalism does not encourage people to take an active role in changing their social
environment, even when such changes may benefit them. Instead, functionalism sees active
social change as undesirable because the various parts of society will compensate naturally for
any problems that may arise.
According to the functionalists, the purposes of the school are the following:
1) Intellectual purposes – acquisition of cognitive skills and inquiry skills
2) Political purposes – educate future citizens; promote patriotism; promote assimilation of
immigrants; ensure order, public civility and conformity to laws
3) Economic purposes – prepare students for later work roles; select and train the labor
force needed by society.
4) Social purposes – promote a sense of social and moral responsibility; serve as a site for
the solution or resolution of social problems; supplement the efforts of other institutions
of socialization such as the family and church.
The Functional theory stresses the functions that education serves in fulfilling a society’s
various needs. Perhaps the most important function of education is socialization. If children are
to learn the norms, values, and skills they need to function in society, then education is a primary
vehicle for such learning. Schools teach the three Rs (reading, ’riting, ’rithmetic), as we all
know, but they also teach many of the society’s norms and values. In the United States, these
norms and values include respect for authority, patriotism, punctuality, and competition (for
grades and sports victories). A second function of education is social integration. For a society to
work, functionalists say, people must subscribe to a common set of beliefs and values. As we
saw, the development of such common views was a goal of the system of free, compulsory
education that developed in the nineteenth century. Thousands of immigrant children in the
United States today are learning English, US history, and other subjects that help prepare them
for the workforce and integrate them into American life.
A third function of education is social placement. Beginning in grade school, students are
identified by teachers and other school officials either as bright and motivated or as less bright
and even educationally challenged. Depending on how they are identified, children are taught at
the level that is thought to suit them best. In this way, they are presumably prepared for their
later station in life. Whether this process works as well as it should is an important issue, and we
explore it further when we discuss school tracking later in this chapter.
Social and cultural innovation is a fourth function of education. Our scientists cannot
make important scientific discoveries and our artists and thinkers cannot come up with great
works of art, poetry, and prose unless they have first been educated in the many subjects they
need to know for their chosen path.
Conflict Theory
Conflict theory looks at society as a competition for limited resources. This perspective is
a macro-level approach most identified with the writings of German philosopher and sociologist
Karl Marx (1818–1883), who saw society as being made up of individuals in different social
classes who must compete for social, material, and political resources such as food and housing,
employment, education, and leisure time. Social institutions like government, education, and
religion reflect this competition in their inherent inequalities and help maintain the unequal
social structure. Some individuals and organizations are able to obtain and keep more resources
than others, and these “winners” use their power and influence to maintain social institutions.
Several theorists suggested variations on this basic theme. Polish-Austrian sociologist Ludwig
Gumplowicz (1838–1909) expanded on Marx’s ideas by arguing that war and conquest are the
basis of civilizations. He believed that cultural and ethnic conflicts led to states being identified
and defined by a dominant group that had power over other groups (Irving 2007).
German sociologist Max Weber agreed with Marx but also believed that, in addition to
economic inequalities, inequalities of political power and social structure cause conflict. Weber
noted that different groups were affected differently based on education, race, and gender, and
that people’s reactions to inequality were moderated by class differences and rates of social
mobility, as well as by perceptions about the legitimacy of those in power. German sociologist
Georg Simmel (1858–1918) believed that conflict can help integrate and stabilize a society. He
said that the intensity of the conflict varies depending on the emotional involvement of the
parties, the degree of solidarity within the opposing groups, and the clarity and limited nature of
the goals. Simmel also showed that groups work to create internal solidarity, centralize power,
and reduce dissent. Resolving conflicts can reduce tension and hostility and can pave the way for
future agreements. In the 1930s and 1940s, German philosophers, known as the Frankfurt
School, developed critical theory as an elaboration on Marxist principles. Critical theory is an
expansion of conflict theory and is broader than just sociology, including other social sciences
and philosophy. A critical theory attempts to address structural issues causing inequality; it must
explain what’s wrong in current social reality, identify the people who can make changes, and
provide practical goals for social transformation (Horkeimer 1982). More recently, inequality
based on gender or race has been explained in a similar manner and has identified
institutionalized power structures that help to maintain inequality between groups. Janet
Saltzman Chafetz (1941–2006) presented a model of feminist theory that attempts to explain the
forces that maintain gender inequality as well as a theory of how such a system can be changed
(Turner 2003). Similarly, critical race theory grew out of a critical analysis of race and racism
from a legal point of view. Critical race theory looks at structural inequality based on white
privilege and associated wealth, power, and prestige (https://www.google.com/search?
q=conflict+theory&rlz=1C1CHBD_enPH901PH902&ei=4-
1zYP_LKPVmAWJ9bboCA&oq=Conf&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAEYADIHCAAQsQMQQzIE
CAAQQzIFCAAQkQIyBAgAEEMyBAgAEEMyCggAELEDEIMBEEMyCggAELEDEIMBEE
MyBQgAELEDMgQIABBDMgcILhCxAxBDOgUIABCwAzoECC4QQ1DiKlikMWCaSmgBc
AB4AIABpQGIAZsFkgEDMC41mAEAoAEBqgEHZ3dzLXdpesgBAcABAQ&sclient=gws-
wiz.
According to this theory, there are always two (2) opposing sides in a conflict solution.
People take sides between maintaining the status quo and introducing change then arrive at an
agreement. The Conflict theory welcomes conflict for that is the way to the establishment of a
new society. Conflict theorists find potential conflict between any groups where inequality
exists: racial, gender, religious, political, economic, and so on. Conflict theories note that
unequal groups usually have conflicting values and agendas, causing them to compete against
one another. This constant competition between groups forms the basis for the ever-changing
nature of society.
Regarding education, according to this theory, education is not truly a social benefit or
opportunity as a seen by the functionalists. Rather, education is a powerful means of maintaining
power structures and creating a docile work for capitalism. The purpose of education is to
maintain social inequality and to preserve the power of those who dominate society and teach
those in the working class to accept their position as a lower class worker of society.
This theory directs sociologists to consider the symbols and details of everyday life, what
these symbols mean and how people interact with each other. As the term implies, the symbolic
interactionist theory states that people interact with one another through symbols. Language is a
predominant symbol among people. People attach meanings to symbols and then they act
according to their subjective interpretation of these symbols. Conversation is an interaction of
symbols between individuals who constantly interpret the world around them. To insure mutual
understanding, the sender of the symbol and the receiver of the symbol must give the same
meaning to the symbol or run the risk of misunderstanding.
The Theoretical Perspectives in a Snap Shot
Theoretical
Major assumptions
perspective
Education serves several functions for society. These include (a) socialization,
(b) social integration, (c) social placement, and (d) social and cultural
innovation. Latent functions include child care, the establishment of peer
Functionalism
relationships, and lowering unemployment by keeping high school students
out of the full-time labor force. Problems in the educational institution harm
society because all these functions cannot be completely fulfilled.
Introduction
As was already discussed in our previous modules, the school has an important role in
shaping and even changing the society. It cannot be denied also that the school is important in
addressing socio-cultural problems, especially during this advanced period of technological
development.
Below is an article about the report on moral recovery submitted on April 27, 1988 by the
Task Force to President Corazon Aquino, the Senate and the members of the press by then
Senator Letecia Shahani, the moving spirit behind the program. This was reiterated by former
CHED Commissioner, Patricia Licuanan.
The events at EDSA in February 1986 not only ousted a dictator, but also demonstrated
to the world and to ourselves our great strengths as a people. At EDSA we saw courage,
determination and strength of purpose; we saw unity and concern for one another; we saw deep
faith in God; and even in the grimmest moments, there was some laughter and humor.
We were proud of ourselves at EDSA and we expected great changes after our moment
of glory. Today, sometime after, we realize that most of our problems as a nation still remain.
We may have ousted a dictator, but that was the easy part. The task of building a nation is so
much more difficult. Now, with EDSA only an inspiring memory, we are faced with our
weaknesses. Self-interest and disregard for the common good rears its ugly head. We are
confronted with our lack of discipline and rigor, our colonial mentality, and our emphasis
on porma (form). Despite our great display of people's power, now we are passive once more,
expecting our leaders to take all responsibility for solving our many problems.
The task of building our nation is an awesome one. There is need for economic recovery.
There is need to re-establish democratic institutions and to achieve the goals of peace and
genuine social justice. Along with these goals, there is a need as well to build ourselves as a
people. There is need to change structures and to change people.
Building a people means eliminating our weaknesses and developing our strengths; this
starts with the analysis, understanding, and appreciation of these strengths and weaknesses. We
must take a good look at ourselves--objectively with scientific detachment, but also emotionally
(i.e., lovingly) and, when appropriate, with disgust. We must view ourselves as might a lover
viewing a loved one but also as might a judge capable of a harsh verdict. We must not be self-
flagellating, but neither can we afford to be defensive.
We must change, and for this, understanding ourselves is the first step.
STRENGTHS OF THE FILIPINO CHARACTER
1) Pakikipagkapwa-Tao (regard for others). Filipinos are open to others and feel one with others.
We regard others with dignity and respect, and deal with them as fellow human
beings. Pakikipagkapwa-tao is manifested in a basic sense of justice and fairness, and in concern
for others. It is demonstrated in the Filipino's ability to empathize with others, in helpfulness and
generosity in times of need (pakikiramay), in the practice of bayanihan or mutual assistance, and
in the famous Filipino hospitality.
Filipinos possess a sensitivity to people's feelings or pakikiramdam, pagtitiwala or trust,
and a sense of gratitude or utang-na-loob. Because of pakikipagkapwa-tao, Filipinos are very
sensitive to the quality of interpersonal relationships and are very dependent on them: if our
relationships are satisfactory, we are happy and secure.
Pakikipagkapwa-tao results in camaraderie and a feeling of closeness one to another. It
helps promote unity as well a sense of social justice.
2) Family Orientation. Filipinos possess a genuine and deep love for the family, which includes
not simply the spouses and children, parents, and siblings, but also grandparents, aunts, uncles,
cousins, godparents, and other ceremonial relatives. To the Filipino, one's family is the source of
personal identity, the source of emotional and material support, and the person's main
commitment and responsibility.
Concern for family is manifested in the honor and respect given to parents and elders, in
the care given to children, the generosity towards kin in need, and in the great sacrifices one
endures for the welfare of the family. This sense of family results in a feeling of belonging or
rootedness and in a basic sense of security.
3) Joy and Humor. Filipinos have a cheerful and fun-loving approach to life and its ups and
downs. There is a pleasant disposition, a sense of humor, and a propensity for happiness that
contribute not only to the Filipino charm, but to the indomitability of the filipino spirit. Laughing
at ourselves and our trouble is an important coping mechanism. Often playful, sometimes
cynical, sometimes disrespectful, we laugh at those we love and at those we hate, and make jokes
about our fortune, good and bad.
This sense of joy and humor is manifested in the Filipino love for socials and
celebrations, in our capacity to laugh even in the most trying of times, and in the appeal of
political satire.
The result is a certain emotional balance and optimism, a healthy disrespect for power
and office, and a capacity to survive.
4) Flexibility, Adaptability and Creativity. Filipinos have a great capacity to adjust, and to adapt
to circumstances and to the surrounding environment, both physical and social. Unplanned or
unanticipated events are never overly disturbing or disorienting as the flexible Filipino adjusts to
whatever happens. We possess a tolerance for ambiguity that enables us to remain unfazed by
uncertainty or lack of information. We are creative, resourceful, adept at learning, and able to
improvise and make use of whatever is at hand in order to create and produce.
This quality of the Filipino is manifested in the ability to adapt to life in any part of the
world; in the ability to make new things out of scrap and to keep old machines running; and, of
course, in the creative talent manifested in the cultural sphere. It is seen likewise in the ability to
accept change.
The result is productivity, innovation, entrepreneurship, equanimity, and survival.
5) Hardwork and Industry. Filipinos have the capacity for hard work, given proper conditions.
The desire to raise one's standard of living and to possess the essentials of a decent life for one's
family, combined with the right opportunities and incentives, stimulate the Filipino to work very
hard. This is manifested most noticeably in a willingness to take risks with jobs abroad, and to
work there at two or three jobs. The result is productivity and entrepreneurship for some, and
survival despite poverty for others.
6) Faith and Religiosity. Filipinos have a deep faith in God. Innate religiosity enables us to
comprehend and genuinely accept reality in the context of God's will and plan. Thus, tragedy and
bad fortune are accepted and some optimism characterizes even the poorest lives.
Filipinos live very intimately with religion; this is tangible--a part of everyday life. We ascribe
human traits to a supernatural God whom we alternately threaten and thank, call upon for mercy
or forgiveness, and appease by pledges. Prayer is an important part of our lives.
The faith of the Filipino is related to bahala na, which, instead of being viewed as
defeatist resignation, may be considered positively as a reservoir of psychic energy, an important
psychological support on which we can lean during difficult times. This pampalakas ng
loob allows us to act despite uncertainty.
Our faith and daring was manifest at EDSA and at other times in our history when it was
difficult to be brave. It is seen also in the capacity to accept failure and defeat without our self-
concept being devastated since we recognize forces external to ourselves as contributing to the
unfolding of events in our lives.
The results of the Filipino's faith are courage, daring, optimism, inner peace, as well as
the capacity to genuinely accept tragedy and death.
7) Ability to Survive. Filipinos have an ability to survive which is manifested in our capacity for
endurance despite difficult times, and in our ability to get by on so little. Filipinos make do with
what is available in the environment, even, e.g., by eking out a living from a garbage dump. This
survival instinct is related to the Filipinos who bravely carry on through the harshest economic
and social circumstances. Regretfully, one wonders what we might be able to do under better
circumstances.
2) Extreme Family-Centeredness. While concern for the family is one of the Filipino's greatest
strengths, in the extreme it becomes a serious flaw. Excessive concern for the family creates an
in-group to which the Filipino is fiercely loyal, to the detriment of concern for the larger
community or the common good.
Excessive concern for family manifests itself in the use of one's office and power as a
means of promoting the interests of the family, in factionalism, patronage, and political
dynasties, and in the protection of erring family members. It results in lack of concern for the
common good and acts as a block to national consciousness.
4) Passivity and Lack of Initiative. Filipinos are generally passive and lacking in initiative. One
waits to be told what has to be done. There is a strong reliance on others, e.g., leaders and
government, to do things for us. This is related to the attitude towards authority. Filipinos have a
need for a strong authority figure and feel safer and more secure in the presence of such an
authority. One is generally submissive to those in authority, and is not likely to raise issues or to
question decisions.
Filipinos tend to be complacent and there rarely is a sense of urgency about any problem.
There is a high tolerance for inefficiency, poor service, and even violations of one's basic rights.
In many ways, it can be said that the Filipino is too patient and long-suffering (matiisin), too
easily resigned to one's fate. Filipinos are thus easily oppressed and exploited.
5) Colonial Mentality. Filipinos have a colonial mentality which is made up of two dimensions:
the first is a lack of patriotism or an active awareness, appreciation, and love of the Philippines;
the second is an actual preference for things foreign.
Filipino culture is characterized by an openness to the outside--adapting and
incorporating the foreign elements into our image of ourselves. Yet this image is not built around
a deep core of Philippine history and language. The result is a cultural vagueness or weakness
that makes Filipinos extraordinarily susceptible to the wholesome acceptance of modern mass
culture which is often Western. Thus, there is preference for foreign fashion, entertainment,
lifestyles, technology, consumer items, etc.
The Filipino colonial mentality is manifested in the alienation of the elite from their roots
and from the masses, as well as in the basic feeling of national inferiority that makes it difficult
for Filipinos to relate as equals to Westerners.
6) Kanya-Kanya Syndrome. Filipinos have a selfish, self-serving attitude that generates a feeling
of envy and competitiveness towards others, particularly one's peers, who seem to have gained
some status or prestige. Towards them, the Filipino demonstrated the so-called "crab mentality",
using the levelling instruments of tsismis, intriga and unconstructive criticism to bring others
down. There seems to be a basic assumption that another's gain is our loss.
The kanya-kanya syndrome is also evident in personal ambition and drive for power and status
that is completely insensitive to the common good. Personal and in-group interests reign
supreme. This characteristic is also evident in the lack of a sense of service among people in the
government bureaucracy. The public is made to feel that service from these offices and from
these civil servants is an extra perk that has to be paid for.
The kanya-kanya syndrome results in the dampening of cooperative and community spirit
and in the denial of the rights of others.
Attempts to maintain discipline come in the form of many "no's" and "don'ts" and a
system of criticism to keep children in line. Subtle comparisons among siblings also are used by
mothers to control their children. These may contribute to the "crab mentality."
In a large family where we are encouraged to get along with our siblings and other relatives, we
learn pakikipagkapwa-tao. In an authoritarian setting we learn respect for age and authority; at
the same time we become passive and dependent on authority.
In the family, children are taught to value family and to give it primary importance.
The Social Environment. The main components of the social environment are social
structures and social systems such as interpersonal religious and community interaction. The
social environment of the Filipino is characterized by a feudal structure with great gaps between
the rich minority and the poor majority. These gaps are not merely economic but cultural as well,
with the elite being highly westernized and alienated from the masses. This feudal structure
develops dependence and passivity.
The Filipino is raised in an environment where one must depend on relationships with
others in order to survive. In a poor country where resources are scarce and where the systems
meant to respond to people's needs can be insensitive, inefficient, or non-existent, the Filipino
becomes very dependent on kinship and interpersonal relationships.
Sensitivity about hurting established relationships controls our behavior. We are
restrained from making criticisms no matter how constructive, so standards of quality are not
imposed. We have difficulty saying no to requests and are pressured to favor our family and
friends. That trying to get ahead of others is not considered acceptable exerts a strong brake upon
efforts to improve our individual performance. The struggle for survival and our dependence on
relationships make us in-group oriented.
Culture and Language. Much has been written about Filipino cultural values. Such
characteristics such as warmth and person orientation, devotion to family, and sense of joy and
humor are part of our culture and are reinforced by all socializing forces such as the family,
school, and peer group.
Filipino culture rewards such traits and corresponding behavioral patterns develop
because they make one more likable and enable life to proceed more easily.
Aside from emphasizing interpersonal values, Filipino culture is also characterized by an
openness to the outside which easily incorporates foreign elements without a basic consciousness
of our cultural core. This is related to our colonial mentality and to the use of English as the
medium of instruction in schools.
The introduction of English as the medium of education de-Filipinized the youth and
taught them to regard American culture as superior. The use of English contributes also to a lack
of self-confidence on the part of the Filipino. The fact that doing well means using a foreign
language, which foreigners inevitably can handle better, leads to an inferiority complex. At a
very early age, we find that our self-esteem depends on the mastery of something foreign.
The use of a foreign language may also explain the Filipino's unreflectiveness and mental
laziness.
Thinking in our native language, but expressing ourselves in English, results not only in a
lack of confidence, but also in a lack in our power of expression, imprecision, and a stunted
development of one's intellectual powers.
History. We are the product of our colonial history, which is regarded by many as the
culprit behind our lack of nationalism and our colonial mentality. Colonialism developed a mind-
set in the Filipino which encouraged us to think of the colonial power as superior and more
powerful. As a second-class citizen beneath the Spanish and then the Americans, we developed a
dependence on foreign powers that makes us believe we are not responsible for our country's
fate.
The American influence is more ingrained in the Philippines because the Americans set
up a public school system where we learned English and the American way of life. Present-day
media reinforce these colonial influences, and the Filipino elite sets the example by their western
ways.
Another vestige of our colonial past is our basic attitude towards the government, which
we have learned to identify as foreign and apart from us. Thus, we do not identify with
government and are distrustful and uncooperative towards it. Much time and energy is spent
trying to outsmart the government, which we have learned from our colonial past to regard as an
enemy.
The Educational System. Aside from the problems inherent in the use of a foreign
language in our educational system, the educational system leads to other problems for us as a
people. The lack of suitable local textbooks and dependence on foreign textbooks, particularly in
the higher school levels, force Filipino students as well as their teachers to use school materials
that are irrelevant to the Philippine setting. From this comes a mind-set that things learned in
school are not related to real life.
Aside from the influences of the formal curriculum, there are the influences of the
"hidden curriculum" i.e., the values taught informally by the Philippine school system. Schools
are highly authoritarian, with the teacher as the central focus. The Filipino student is taught to be
dependent on the teacher as we attempt to record verbatim what the teacher says and to give this
back during examinations in its original form and with little processing. Teachers reward well-
behaved and obedient students and are uncomfortable with those who ask questions and express
a different viewpoint. The Filipino student learns passivity and conformity. Critical thinking is
not learned in the school.
Religion. Religion is the root of Filipino optimism and its capacity to accept life's
hardships. However, religion also instills in the Filipino attitudes of resignation and a pre-
occupation with the afterlife. We become vulnerable also to being victimized by opportunism,
oppression, exploitation, and superstition.
The Economic Environment. Many Filipino traits are rooted in the poverty and hard life
that is the lot of most Filipinos. Our difficulties drive us to take risks, impel us to work very hard,
and develop in us the ability to survive. Poverty, however, has also become an excuse for graft
and corruption, particularly among the lower rungs of the bureaucracy. Unless things get too
difficult, passivity sets in.
The Political Environment. The Philippine political environment is characterized by a
centralization of power. Political power and authority is concentrated in the hands of the elite and
the participation of most Filipinos often is limited to voting in elections.
Similarly, basic services from the government are concentrated in Manila and its outlying towns
and provinces. A great majority of Filipinos are not reached by such basic services as water,
electricity, roads, and health services. Government structures and systems--e.g., justice and
education--are often ineffective or inefficient.
Since the government often is not there to offer basic services, we depend on our family,
kin, and neighbors for our everyday needs. The absence of government enhances our extreme
family-and even community-centeredness. We find it difficult to identify with a nation-family,
since the government is not there to symbolize or represent the state.
The fact that political power is still very much concentrated in the hands of a few may
lead to passivity. The inefficiency of government structures and systems also leads to a lack of
integrity and accountability in our public servants.
Mass Media. Mass media reinforces our colonial mentality. Advertisements using Caucasian
models and emphasizing a product's similarity with imported brands are part of our daily lives.
The tendency of media to produce escapist movies, soap operas, comics, etc., feed th
Filipino's passivity. Rather than confront our poverty and oppression, we fantasize instead. The
propensity to use flashy sets, designer clothes, superstars, and other bongga features
reinforce porma.
Leadership and Role Models. Filipinos look up to their leaders as role models. Political leaders
are the main models, but all other leaders serve as role models as well. Thus, when our leaders
violate the law or show themselves to be self-serving and driven by personal interest--when there
is lack of public accountability--there is a negative impact on the Filipino.
General Strategic Principles. In identifying goals for change and developing our capabilities for
their achievement, it is necessary to consider certain general principles:
Roles of Power-Holders and the Masa. To ensure that meaningful change will take place,
proposed strategies must emphasize change among power-holders or decision-makers as much as
among the masa. These power-holders and decision-makers hold the key to structures and
systems which in most cases need to be set up first before change can take place. Unless the
people on top change, it will be difficult to expect real change. On the other hand, as
the masa constitute the greater majority of Philippine society, any program for change will have
to target this critical mass. Their active participation and support are indispensable components
of our strategies.
Critical Mass or Network of Change Initiators. The initiators of change should not be a few
individuals, but a critical mass or network of people highly committed to the goals of change.
Aside from initiating change, the role of the critical mass or network of people is to follow
through with persistence on the implementation of these strategies. This prevents ningas
cogon from setting in.
Restricted or "Bite-Size" Goals. Strategies for change must be worked on one goal at a time,
with everyone's effort concentrated on the goal chosen for that designated time period. The goals
must be cut up into bite-size, realistic pieces, for easier management.
Goals Related to People's Lives. Change strategies must be connected to our daily lives,
particularly to our economic activities, businesses, professions, occupations and jobs. Value
change must likewise address matters close to our hearts, that is, activities and affairs of our
families and communities from which change must start.
Act of the Will and Self-Sacrifice. The implementation of these strategies must be an act of the
will. If we want change, kailangang kayanin natin. We must be ready for tremendous sacrifice--
starting with ourselves.
SPECIFIC STRATEGIES
A. For Developing Patriotism, and National Pride:
1. Ideology. We need a national ideology that can summon all our resources for the task of lifting
national morale, pride and productivity.
2. History.
a. We have to write and teach our true history; history books must be rewritten from our
perspective.
b. We should include in our education those aspects of the past that are still preserved by cultural
communities. The culture and traditions of these minorities should be protected and given
importance.
c. We can start instilling national pride by nurturing community pride first. This can be done by
setting up community museums where materials reflecting of local history are displayed: old folk
re-telling our town or community history in public gatherings; reviving local cultural groups;
tracing family trees; having family reunions, etc.
3. Languages. We ought to use Filipino in our cultural and intellectual life. Some of our
universities and other institutions have started doing this; the practice should be continued and
expanded.
4. Education.
a. We must push for the Filipinization of the entire educational system.
b. We must have value formation in the school curriculum and teach pride in being a Filipino.
c. Literature should be used to instill national pride.
5. Trade and Industry. We should support the "Buy Filipino" movement by:
a. Identifying and making known the centers of product excellence in the Philippines; and
dispersing economic activities based on local product expertise and indigenous materials (i.e.,
industries should be developed in the respective regions where the required skills and resources
already abound).
b. Having a big brother-small brother relationship between companies, where big companies
could help related companies improve the quality of their products. The government could also
act as a big brother helping these small companies improve the quality of their output.
c. Having an "order-regalo" or "order-pasalubong" (gift) project which targets Filipinos abroad.
This could be initiated by both the government and businessmen.
d. Promoting a "Sariling Atin" day when everybody would wear and use Filipino clothes and
products only.
6. Media/Advertising.
a. We can coordinate with KBP, PANA and other media agencies in such projects as the
following:
- Giving awards or other incentives to advertisements that promote national pride and patriotism.
Conversely, giving "kalabasa" awards or denying incentives to advertisements that promote
colonial mentality.
- Prohibiting the use of foreign models in advertisements.
b. We can organize contests (i.e., oratorical, story, drama, essay, etc.) about love for country, and
about what Filipinos like about their country or their countrymen. These stories, dramas, essays,
and the like can then be made into teaching materials for our schools.
c. We need to use media programs (such as comics and programs in the various dialects) that will
reach with the masa or great majority of people. For instance, R. Constantino's, "How to
Decolonize the Filipino Mind", could be written in comics form in the various dialects.
7. Government.
a. The leadership in the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the government should be
models of positive Filipino traits.
b. In order to promote national unity and national integration, the government must attempt a
long-range strategy for democratic transformation in Philippine politics.
c. The government must continue and even increase its present efforts to have a more
independent economic strategy: it must diversify its sources of assistance and not merely rely on
the U.S. or on any other foreign nation.
3. Religious Organizations/Movements.
a. Religious family movements, like Marriage Encounter or the Christian Family Movement, can
be encouraged to reach out to the poor who are the least prepared for family life. Programs for
the poor should be coordinated with the government and religious institutions.
b. The charismatic, cursillo, and born-again movements should be encouraged to concretize
spiritual doctrines by reaching out to the poor and contributing to nation-building.
4. Education.
a. Communication of our schools should be developed to give a common experience to students
and to foster greater equality in society.
b. Social orientation courses in our schools should be not only for socialization activities, but
also for socially-oriented and socially-relevant activities.
2. Education/Training.
a. The career executive program given to government officials should be extended, that is, a
similar program should be drawn up for all government employees. The program can be a
training package called "Public Service".
b. Our government employees should be given value clarification seminars.
2. Small Groups/NGO's.
a. We can start a movement of small groups (e.g., community groups, work groups, and parish
groups) where people can begin to reflect on their situation and that of the country.
b. Some big companies are already inculcating the habit of observation-action-reflection through
training programs that use experiential methods. These efforts should be expanded. Specifically,
the training programs could be re-designed for use in other contexts, such as in the small groups
mentioned in the preceding paragraph.
3. Government Leadership.
a. We should encourage "conversion" at the top level, as manifested in public "repentance" or
confession.
b. The Department of Education, Culture and Sports (DECS) and private learning institutions
should inculcate the value and habit of self-reflection starting from childhood. Educational
methods should not focus on rote learning, but should emphasize reflection and analysis.
c. We can conduct a "national reflection weekend" for officials and employees in all levels and
branches of the government. During this weekend, government personnel can repeat the process
of the Moral Recovery project, that is, reflect on Filipino traits, then contemplate goals for
strengthening the positive traits and changing the negative traits; or a commission or similar unit
can go to regional and provincial levels to help the regional and provincial government officials
and employees in their reflection.
d. We can strengthen the research arms of government agencies by linking them with universities
and non-governmental organizations.
In conclusion, it is recommended that once this report is submitted to the Senate and becomes a
Senate Report, the project should be allowed to develop on its own, independent of, but in
collaboration with, the legislature. It is envisioned that training modules could be developed that
would enable a critical mass of people to reflect on our strengths and weaknesses as a people. It
is important that these modules not simply communicate the findings of the project, but, more
importantly, should attempt to replicate the process of communal reflection that was an essential
ingredient of the project methodology.
MODULE V– GLOBAL ISSUES THAT CONCERN SCHOOLS AND SOCIETY
Introduction
The world has become a global village. We are now part of the global community and
what happens in one part of the world can affect us, no matter how far we seem to be. In this part
of the module, we will be discussing global issues that affect the schools and us. We will begin
with the Ten (10) most critical problems in the World according to the Millennials, then the
Ten (10) Current Global Issues according to Turner and finally, the Seventeen (17) Sustainable
Development Goals for the period 2015 – 2030. In the process of discussing and learning about
these issues, we will also try to identity feasible, plausible and workable solutions that can be
used to address these issues.
Below are the top-10 most concerning world issues, according to millennials.
1. Climate change / destruction of nature (48.8%)
2. Large scale conflict / wars (38.9%)
3. Inequality (Income, Discrimination) 30.8%
4. Poverty (29.2%)
5. Religious Conflicts (23.9%)
6. Government accountability and transparency / corruption (22.7%)
7. Food and water security (18.2%)
8. Lack of education (15.9%)
9. Safety/security/Well-being (14.1%)
10. Lack of economic opportunity and unemployment (12.1%)
Source: https://www.businessinsider.com/world-economic-forum-world-biggest-problems-
concerning-millennials-2016-8
Top 10 Current Global Issues and How they can be Addressed
Among all the good in the world, and all the progress being made in global issues, there
is still much more to be done. Given the overwhelming disasters that nations, including the U.S.,
have been or still are going through, it is important to be aware of the most pressing global
issues.
1) Climate Change
The global temperatures are rising, and are estimated to increase from 2.6 degrees Celsius to
4.8 degrees Celsius by 2100. This would cause more severe weather, crises with food and
resources and the spread of diseases. The reduction of greenhouse emissions and the
spreading of education on the importance of going green can help make a big difference.
Lobbying governments and discussing policies to reduce carbon emissions and encouraging
reforestation is an effective way of making progress with climate change.
2) Pollution
Pollution is one of the most difficult global issues to combat, as the umbrella term refers
to ocean litter, pesticides and fertilizers, air, light and noise pollution. Clean water is
essential for humans and animals, but more than one billion people don’t have access to
clean water due to pollution from toxic substances, sewage or industrial waste. It is of the
utmost importance that people all over the world begin working to minimize the various
types of pollution, in order to better the health of the planet and all those living on it.
3) Violence
Violence can be found in the social, cultural and economic aspects of the world. Whether
it is conflict that has broken out in a city, hatred targeted at a certain group of people or
sexual harassment occurring on the street, violence is a preventable problem that has been
an issue for longer than necessary. With continued work on behalf of the governments of
all nations, as well as the individual citizens, the issue can be addressed and reduced.
5) Lack of Education
More than 72 million children throughout the globe that are of the age to be in primary
education are not enrolled in school. This can be attributed to inequality and
marginalization as well as poverty. Fortunately, there are many organizations that work
directly with the issue of education in providing the proper tools and resources to aid
schools.
6) Unemployment
Without the necessary education and skills for employment, many people,
particularly 15- to 24-year olds, struggle to find jobs and create a proper living for
themselves and their families. This leads to a lack of necessary resources, such as enough
food, clothing, transportation and proper living conditions. Fortunately, there are
organizations throughout the world teaching people in need the skills for jobs and
interviewing, helping to lift people from the vicious cycle of poverty.
7) Government Corruption
Corruption is a major cause of poverty considering how it affects the poor the most,
eroding political and economic development, democracy and more. Corruption can be
detrimental to the safety and well being of citizens living within the corrupted vicinity,
and can cause an increase in violence and physical threats without as much regulation in
the government.
9) Substance Abuse
The United Nations reports that, by the beginning of the 21st century, an estimated 185
million people over the age of 15 were consuming drugs globally. The drugs most
commonly used are marijuana, cocaine, alcohol, amphetamine stimulants, opiates and
volatile solvents. Different classes of people, both poor and rich, partake in substance
abuse, and it is a persistent issue throughout the world. Petitions and projects are in
progress to end the global issue of substance abuse.
10) Terrorism
Terrorism is an issue throughout the world that causes fear and insecurity, violence and
death. Across the globe, terrorists attack innocent people, often without warning. This
makes civilians feel defenseless in their everyday lives. Making national security a higher
priority is key in combating terrorism, as well as promoting justice in wrongdoings to
illustrate the enforcement of the law and the serious punishments for terror crimes.
With so many current global issues that require immediate attention, it is easy to get
discouraged. However, the amount of progress that organizations have made in combating
these problems is admirable, and the world will continue to improve in the years to come. By
staying active in current events, and standing up for the health and safety of all humans,
everyone is able to make a difference in changing the fate of our world.
– Chloe Turner
Source: https://borgenproject.org/top-10-current-global-issues/
The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted by all United Nations Member
States in 2015, provides a shared blueprint for peace and prosperity for people and the planet,
now and into the future. At its heart are the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which
are an urgent call for action by all countries - developed and developing - in a global partnership.
They recognize that ending poverty and other deprivations must go hand-in-hand with strategies
that improve health and education, reduce inequality, and spur economic growth – all while
tackling climate change and working to preserve our oceans and forests.
Source: https://sdgs.un.org/goals
Finally, learning partnerships with schools can strengthen and support community
partners. They can
help gain access to and recruit groups of students most in need of support services;
improve program quality and staff engagement, particularly when there is crossover between
school and community organization staff;
foster better alignment of programming to support a shared vision for learning, one which
aligns curriculum to support state and local standards; and
maximize resource use such as facilities, staff, data, and curriculum.
Source: https://www.expandinglearning.org/expandingminds/article/school-community-learning-
partnerships-essential-expanded-learning-success
Discussion Proper
Leadership is the art of motivating a group of people to act toward achieving a
common goal. Leadership captures the essentials of being able and prepared to inspire others.
Effective leadership is based upon ideas—both original and borrowed—that are effectively
communicated to others in a way that engages them enough to act as the leader wants them to
act. A leader inspires others to act while simultaneously directing the way that they act. They
must be personable enough for others to follow their orders, and they must have the critical
thinking skills to know the best way to use the resources at an organization's disposal
(https://www.thebalancesmb.com/leadership-definition-2948275).
In the school setting, the school leader motivates the stakeholders of the community
toward achieving a goal or a target that is set. He/She is also able to prepare and inspire others in
order to meet that goal.
Organizational leadership (OL) is a field of work that includes setting goals for both individuals
and groups of people. This field of work may include working on large projects with businesses and
corporations, and even smaller projects with groups of people who share similar outlooks. Individuals
looking to become involved in this field will need to be organized and vision oriented. The ability to
see both the small and big picture is necessary. Additionally, it takes someone who can meet the needs
of many different types of people who are working together towards a goal
(https://www.bestcollegereviews.org/faq/what-is-organizational-leadership/, April 2021).
Leadership Skills
What characteristics to skills should one possess to be a leader? The video you have
watched about the lion has identified some characteristics of a leader. But there is no single
reference that could completely describe a leader. Hence, several ideas on the skills of a
leader are presented below.
There is no unique way to describe great leadership skills. Unsurprisingly, you can find
different lists describing the leadership skills one should possess to become a great leader in the
workplace.
In essence, leadership skills are the abilities people have to lead and deliver projects,
encourage initiatives, build a sense of common purpose, and empower others.
Leadership skills also include the abilities people have to steer employees toward the
achievement of the business goals, inspire them, drive change, and deliver results.
There are many different leadership skills required in the workplace, but the most in-
demand ones include: (1) Active listening; (2) Empathy; (3) The ability to share clear messages
and make complex ideas easy to understand for everyone; (4) Strategic thinking skills; (5)
Creativity; (6) The ability to inspire and convince others; (7) Flexibility; (8) The ability to turn
information into action; (9) Project planning; (10) The ability to assess employees’ strengths and
weaknesses; (11) Business storytelling; (12) Time management; (13) The ability to build trust;
(14) Strong communication skills; (15) Positivity; (16) Reliability; (17) Management skills; (18)
The ability to align the employees with the school values and goals; (18) A strong leadership
vision; (19) Recruiting skills; (20) Persuasion skills; (21) The ability to help employees find
meaning at work; and, (22) Strong charisma (https://blog.smarp.com/what-are-the-top-
leadership-skills-that-make-a-great-leader).
The Top 10 Leadership Skills are (1) Communication; (2) Motivation; (3) Delegating; (4)
Positivity; (5) Trustworthiness; (6) Creativity; (7) Feedback; (8) Responsibility; (9)
Commitment; and (10) Flexibility (DOYLE, 2021 https://www.thebalancecareers.com/top-
leadership-skills-2063782).
Instructional leadership
Effective school management generally comes from engagement in instructional
leadership. There’s a growing body of evidence which shows that schools with instructional
leadership outperform others. This coaching style of leadership concentrates on student learning
outcomes by improving teaching quality. To realise this goal, school leaders adopt the
responsibility for the professional development of teachers.
Instructional leadership involves the practice of planning, evaluation, coordination and
improvement of teaching and learning. According to the Australian Institute for Teaching and
School Leadership, instructional leaders define the school’s mission, manage the instructional
program, promote high expectations and provide incentives for teachers and students.
Working directly with teachers, instructional leaders evaluate teacher performance and
help advance their skills through mentoring and coaching. Becoming an instructional leader
entails time spent solving pedagogical problems, taking action to improve teachers’ instruction,
as well as holding teachers accountable for improving their instructional skills. This pursuit to
improve learning within the school community requires leaders to have an in-depth
understanding of pedagogy and practice themselves.
Transformational leadership
Taking a collaborative approach, transformational leaders empower their school teams to
have a say in decision-making processes and enable collective goal-setting. Through role
modelling, these leaders create a culture of innovation and improvement and a shared sense of
purpose. This sets the foundations for growth and success.
Transformational leaders are able to influence school outcomes by outlining high-
performance expectations, developing people through individual support, building productive
relationships and providing instructional support. According to researcher Bernard Bass, the four
attributes of transformational leadership are defined as idealized influence, inspirational
motivation, intellectual stimulation and individualized consideration.
Transformational leaders instill trust, admiration, loyalty and respect – which inspires
teacher motivation, morale and performance. The influence exerted by transformational leaders
has been described as “the generating of feelings.” Using charisma, compassion and emotional
intelligence (EI), transformational leaders are able to monitor and manage not only their own
emotions but those of others as well. This gives them the ability to energise their teams and drive
successes.
Studies have shown that transformational leadership has a direct impact on teacher
performance, with teachers willingly taking steps to improve their classroom practice. The
findings also show that transformational leadership increases teacher job satisfaction and
strengthens their commitment to professional growth. The result is improved student
outcomes and lasting progress across the school system.
Constructivist leadership
This type of leadership is about facilitating the learning process, rather than directing it.
At the core of the constructivist approach is that learners control their own learning, not teachers.
Acknowledging that every learner understands, processes and gives meaning to lessons through
their own reality, constructivism places a priority on customized teaching approaches that take
into consideration individual learning needs.
School leaders who embrace the constructivist model shift the focus within their school,
from knowledge as a product to knowing as a process. Instruction and curriculum design under
their leadership encourages the sharing of big ideas and challenging other’s perspectives. The
classroom is seen as a place where ‘inquiry and co-construction dominate.’ Constructivist leaders
expect teachers to engage in reflective practices and processes with their students and peers. The
purpose of reflection is to challenge previous assumptions about teaching and learning and to
rethink and reframe student participation.
Constructivist leadership is about immersing teachers in a culture of learning and
enabling them to take risks. It’s not about dictating to teachers on how to deliver instructions –
it’s about educating teachers that we are all learners.
Servant leadership
This participatory style of leadership pushes the ego aside and considers the needs of
others, rather than focus on self-interest. The philosophy behind servant leadership is that a
“great leader must first serve others and that this simple fact is central to his or her greatness:
true leadership emerges from those whose primary motivation is a desire to help others.” School
leaders who practice servant leadership maintain high expectations; however, they also help
teachers and students to develop their skills to improve their performance. These leaders instill
the desire for improvement while maintaining a focus on both results and relationships.
The former president of the Robert K. Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership identified
the ten characteristics of servant leaders as: listening, empathy, healing, awareness, persuasion,
conceptualization, foresight, stewardship, commitment to the growth of people, and building
community. Servant leaders are able to cultivate high-performance teachers by removing
barriers, providing resources and opening communication channels with the whole school
community.
Sharing the power in decision-making, servant leaders motivate and persuade their school
community to fulfil their long-standing vision. By engaging with teachers and students on what
the school’s future should look like, servant leaders can implement structural changes that keep
an eye on the bigger picture. Research shows that in the long-term servant leadership creates a
positive and productive school environment.
Strategic leadership
Strategic leadership is based on long-range planning. Through analysis, evaluation and
monitoring, strategic leaders assess current school performance and take the necessary steps to
improve future results. These leaders not only set the direction of the school by having an
organizational vision, they create frameworks, set up interventions, allocate resources and
maintain systems for reforms to take place.
There are seven guiding principles of strategic leaders. Rather than focusing on day-to-
day issues, strategic leaders are future-orientated and prepare for an uncertain destiny. These
leaders base their decisions on evidence and research. Drawing on data that demonstrates school
learning outcomes, strategic leaders will respond with the most suitable approach – whether
that’s staff training, reviewing policies and procedures, or fostering a culture based on
achievements. Innovation is at the heart of a strategic leader’s mission – they’re always looking
for ways to improve the school environment – whether that’s relationship building, embracing
diversity or creating partnerships with parents. Strategic leaders invest in partnerships across the
school community and use the power of collective thinking to build a values-based school were
transparency, ethics and accountability are the cornerstones of their leadership.
Studies show that using strategy as a tool to manage an educational organization is at the
heart of developing successful schools in the long term. Aligning organizational structures,
processes, culture and people behind a strategic focus is critical to this success.
Transformational Leadership
Another type of leader that are found effective now are the transformational leaders.
The transformational leader is not content with status quo and sees the need to transform
the way the organization thinks, relates and does things. The transformational school leader sees
school culture as it could be and should be, not as it is and so plays his/role as a visionary,
engager, learner, collaborator, and instructional leader. As a transformational leader, he/she
makes positive changes in the organization by collaboratively developing new vision for the
organization and mobilizing members to work towards that vision.
To do this, the transformational leader combines charisma, inspirational leadership and
intellectual stimulation to introduce innovation for the transformation of the organization.
Sustaining Change
For reforms to transform, the innovations introduced by the leader must be
institutionalized and sustained. A proof of this is if the result or effect of the change persists or
ripples even when the transformational leader is gone or transferred to another school or gets
promoted in the organization. If school leaders want improvement in the way things are done in
the organization, in the school, or even in life, that change should be embraced. And this change
must be dealt with for the innovation to be sustained.
To insure that the innovation introduced leads to the transformation of the organization,
Morato of Bayan ABS – CBN (2011) gives the following advice.
1) Seek the support of the stakeholders
2) Get the people involved early and often
3) Plan a communications campaign
4) Ensure that the innovation is understood by all
5) Consider timing and phasing
MODULE IX – THE SCHOOL HEAD IN SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT (SBM)
School-Based Management
School-based management (SBM) is a strategy to improve education by transferring
significant decision-making authority from state and district offices to individual schools. SBM
provides principals, teachers, students, and parents greater control over the education process by
giving them responsibility for decisions about the budget, personnel, and the curriculum.
Through the involvement of teachers, parents, and other community members in these key
decisions, SBM can create more effective learning environments for children.
In addition, based on international experience, the following must be present for SBM to
succeed in schools:
have basic resources;
have developed an effective school support system;
are provided with regular information on their performance;
are given advice on how they may improve; and,
emphasize the motivational element in the management work of the principal.
These factors are exemplified by high performing schools in the Philippines and abroad
and by the best education performing countries in the world.
In the Philippines, the practice of School-Based Management gave greater autonomy to
schools to make decisions in collaboration with parents and community towards greater school
effectiveness.
The heart of all these elements, both human and non-human is the school head, the school
leader. These means that all these factors an contribute to school effectiveness and can come
forth only with a dynamic and transformational school leader.
MODULE X – CREATING A POSITIVE SCHOOL CULTURE
Introduction
In this module we will be learning about school culture that can greatly affect the
learning, growth and development of students.
We will begin by differentiating school climate from school culture, which are often used
synonymously but are actually different. Then we will be learning about school culture,
including the elements associated with it. We then end the module with a presentation of the
teacher norms and student norms.
Discussion Proper
School culture has become a central concept in many efforts to change how schools
operate and improve educational results. While a school culture is heavily influenced by its
institutional history, culture also shapes social patterns, habits, and dynamics that influence
future behaviors, which could become an obstacle to reform and improvement. For example, if a
faculty culture is generally dysfunctional—i.e., if interpersonal tensions and distrust are
common, problems are rarely addressed or resolved, or staff members tend to argue more than
they collaborate or engage in productive professional discussions—it is likely that these cultural
factors will significantly complicate or hinder any attempt to change how the school
operates. This simple example illustrates why school culture has become the object of so many
research studies and reform efforts—without a school culture that is conducive to improvement,
reform becomes exponentially more difficult.
The following describe a few representative examples of common ways that schools may
attempt to improve their culture:
Establishing professional learning communities that encourages teachers to communicate,
share expertise, and work together more collegially and productively.
Providing presentations, seminars, and learning experiences designed to educate staff and
students about bullying and reduce instances of bullying.
Creating events and educational experiences that honor and celebrate the racial, ethnic, and
linguistic diversity of the student body, such as hosting cultural events and festivals,
exhibiting culturally relevant materials throughout the school, inviting local cultural leaders
to present to students, or making explicit connections between the diverse cultural
backgrounds of students and what is being taught in history, social studies, and literature
courses. For related discussions, see multicultural education and voice.
Establishing an advisory program that pairs groups of students with adult advisor to
strengthen adult-student relationships and ensure that students are well known and
supported by at least one adult in the school.
Surveying students, parents, and teachers about their experiences in the school, and hosting
community forums that invite participants to share their opinions about and
recommendations for the school and its programs.
Creating a leadership team comprising a representative cross-section of school
administrators, teachers, students, parents, and community members that oversees and leads
a school-improvement initiative
Source: https://www.edglossary.org/school-culture/
Norms
Norms are a fundamental concept in the social sciences. They are most commonly
defined as rules or expectations that are socially enforced. Norms may be prescriptive
(encouraging positive behavior; for example, “be honest”) or proscriptive (discouraging negative
behavior; for example, “do not cheat”). The term is also sometimes used to refer to patterns of
behavior and internalized values. Norms are important for their contribution to social order.
Governments (and other hierarchies) and markets are argued to contribute to order, as are
individual prosocial motivations. But the norms enforced through groups and networks also play
an important role. Norms have long been used to explain behavior, but in recent years, scholars
have increasingly focused on explaining norms themselves—in particular, their emergence and
enforcement (Christine Horne in https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-
9780199756384/obo-9780199756384-0091.xml).