€891-G8061 Vd ‘eAouR|IIA Aysseniup eAoueRlllA Aleiqry jevowayy Aeajes TI rssasppy Buiddiys W4l00°SZ$ }s09xeW aBseyd SHOVLS ‘40HeD07 yooe €Lecow 891d #IleD vA} ‘said AUSIAIUA) EIQUINIOD | YOA MON :yULdUU UONN|OASY JO JdadU0D WaPo au} JO LAO JdJO}sIH :499|}9SOy WEYUley -OPLL eony “WeYUlaY ‘YD9//eSOy YOUN efIW quend|as apnjoul eseald) JG-ey :seBeqyooz -4eeAsuz}UOW renss]_ df elquunjo5 Aq paysi|qnd yoog :awnjo, / @uwUI} [29110}S1Y Jo soquewes ey} UO ! sed seuniny :epLL feUnor [8LGeO ‘IIW}OOY :UOsed Lid‘N¥d'NAL'WOd‘ONd. ‘6uryg Burpue7 NAd :48M011I0g NL pelt HVA TM} °°” ueoT Aleiqisiojuy a8a]]OD uosuryoiqstated in tying to bridge the gulf between past and Fut: history i 20 longer teacher of the at of making poical prescriptions, bt iin ‘vale in hat inptes and instructs independent crete jdgenen.™ [No matter how schoaty, every past example aes to late. Histor an relat to history oni nist In other words, historsm renouncesa [story which simultaneously suspends the condition ofits possibilty a2 practcl-histovel ance The criss of historia coincides with this bu this dos not preven the is survival o longs“ Gechic” exists. ‘Henry Adams wasthe ist to make aserousatempt dealing method- ‘cally with this problem, He developed theory of moverent that dealt simultaneously with Pogres and History, and that was specie y his _questionng ofthe strstr of hori sme. Adams proposed a lw of {cclertion (a cle) on the basi of which standards were contin Sly aero, sine the accleition ofthe fture consent foreshorened Fesorto the past. Population increased in ever-docesing interac callycreated elacties rose exponentially the increse of production shoed similar tendencies, likewise scene produc: fe expecancy ‘es sing and hence extending generational span—from dese and many ther examples tha co be rely mishipid, Adams dee the conelsion {hat one could nolenger teach hoe ta behave, but atte mos, howto eat Allthe teacher could hope for was to teach [the mid] eeation."™" HISTORICAL CRITERIA OF THE MODERN CONCEPT OF REVOLUTION. ‘There are few words So widely diffe and belonging o stuly ‘0 modem politcal vocabulary asthe term “revaton” ls belong, of cour to those widely used forcefl expressions whote lack of concept clarity sso marked that they canbe define as slogas. Quite early he semantic content of revolution” isnot exhausted by such logic wage ‘nd us. Instead he ter “evolution” nates upheaval or cv wa well as long-term change, events, and stractres that reach deep int out