International Journal of

INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS IN

ENGINEERING
ISSN:2147-67992147-6799 www.ijisae.org Original Research Paper

Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Properties: Legal and Ethical

Considerations
Mohammad Abdallah1,*, Mousa Salah2

Submitted: 27/08/2023 Revised: 16/10/2023 Accepted: 28/10/2023

Abstract: This research delves into the intricate nexus of artificial intelligence (AI) and intellectual property (IP), addressing the pressing
legal and ethical challenges in this evolving landscape. AI's capacity to autonomously generate content and inventions raises pivotal
questions about inventorship, copyright, and data privacy. It explores the ethical dimensions, considering algorithmic bias and fair usage
in AI-generated content. The study emphasizes the urgent need for adaptable legal frameworks and standardized licensing agreements to
accommodate AI's role in innovation and content creation. Furthermore, it advocates for global harmonization of IP laws and ethical AI
development. By offering practical recommendations for policymakers, AI developers, and stakeholders, this research aims to bridge the
gap between AI innovation and IP protection, nurturing a future where ethical considerations and equitable IP rights coalesce in the AI era.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Intellectual Property, Copyright, Patent, Ethics.

equitable intellectual property rights, fostering a future

1. Introduction
where creativity and innovation thrive within the bounds of
In an era defined by rapid technological advancement, the responsible and respectful AI utilization.
intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and intellectual
In this research paper, we adopt a structured approach.
property (IP) has emerged as a dynamic and multifaceted
Section 2 conducts a comprehensive literature review. We
domain, rich with both promise and complexity. AI, with its
explore the relationship between AI and intellectual
ability to replicate human intelligence and creativity, has
property (IP) in Section 3. The legal implications of AI and
redefined how we generate content, invent, and interact with
IP are carefully examined in Section 4. Section 5 explores
information. Concurrently, IP laws and regulations have
the ethical aspects, while Section 6 provides two case
been tasked with adapting to this transformative force,
studies for a pragmatic viewpoint. We forecast future
facing challenges and ethical dilemmas that demand careful
developments in this subject in Section 7. Finally, Section 8
consideration.
offers procedural considerations and recommendations to
This research endeavors to delve into the intricate meet the challenges and opportunities brought about by the
relationship between AI and IP, unveiling the legal and confluence of AI and IP.
ethical dimensions that underlie this convergence. It
ventures into the heart of AI's creative potential, addressing 2. Literature Review
the contentious issues of inventorship and copyright
In recent years, the intersection of artificial intelligence
ownership when machines become authors. Ethical
(AI), intellectual property (IP) laws, and ethical concerns
dilemmas surrounding algorithmic bias, data privacy, and
has emerged as a prominent and multifaceted field of study.
fair usage are also explored, highlighting the need for
This literature review aims to provide a comprehensive
responsible AI development.
overview of the existing research landscape, shedding light
As we navigate this uncharted terrain, it becomes on the intricate relationship between AI, intellectual
increasingly evident that the harmonization of AI innovation property, and the ethical considerations that permeate this
and IP protection is essential. This research not only domain. While significant progress has been made in
identifies current challenges and legal obstacles but also elucidating these interconnected realms, there exist
extends a guiding hand with practical recommendations for substantial gaps and controversies that warrant further
policymakers, AI developers, and stakeholders. Together, scholarly investigation.
we embark on a journey to ensure that the promising
A multitude of studies have explored the implications of AI
horizons of AI are illuminated by ethical considerations and
on intellectual property laws. Hristov's [1] influential work
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1-Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan – Amman, Jordan

in 2016 brought attention to the intricate challenges
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-3643-0104 associated with copyright and ownership when AI serves as
1-Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan – Amman, Jordan the creative force behind works of art and literature. The
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-3128-0338
* Corresponding Author Email: m.abdallah@zuj.edu.jo study illuminated the pressing need for legal frameworks

International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering IJISAE, 2024, 12(1), 368–376 | 368
that can adapt to the evolving landscape of AI-generated
content and innovative advancements.
Building upon this foundation, Ubaydullayeva’s research in
2023 offered a comprehensive exploration of the impact of
AI on patent law, particularly emphasizing concerns
pertaining to inventorship and the evolving role of human
creators in an AI-driven landscape [2]. These studies
collectively underscore the imperative for adaptable legal
frameworks capable of accommodating the unique
challenges posed by AI-generated content and inventions.
The ethical dimensions arising from the convergence of AI
and intellectual property have garnered substantial scholarly
attention. Safdar et.al. [3] discourse delved into issues of
transparency and accountability within AI algorithms, with
a particular emphasis on the potential for intellectual
property theft facilitated by automated processes. The study
underscored the ethical imperative of developing AI
systems that adhere to responsible and transparent practices,
particularly in the context of intellectual property.
Additionally, another issue was raised, poignant concerns
regarding data privacy when AI systems are deployed to
analyze and mine intellectual property databases. The study
underscored the need for stringent data privacy regulations
and responsible data handling practices to ensure the ethical
usage of AI in IP-related processes [4, 5].
While these contributions have been invaluable, several
gaps and controversies persist in the existing literature:
1. Legal Status of AI-Generated Works: A significant and
unresolved issue pertains to the legal status of creative
works and inventions generated by AI systems. The absence
of a definitive legal framework for ascribing authorship and
ownership rights to AI-generated content remains a
contentious debate [6]. This challenge necessitates urgent
attention, as it directly affects the rights of creators,
innovators, and copyright holders.
2. Comprehensive Ethical Analyses: While various ethical
aspects within the AI and intellectual property nexus have
received scholarly attention, a notable gap exists in
conducting comprehensive analyses. There is a critical need
for research that explores the intricate interplay between
ethical considerations, such as algorithmic bias, the
safeguarding of trade secrets, and data privacy, within the
broader context of AI and intellectual property [7]. Such
holistic analyses would shed light on the nuanced ethical
challenges emerging in this domain.
3. International Harmonization: The international
dimension of intellectual property and AI introduces an
added layer of complexity. Achieving greater consistency
and alignment of laws and regulations across diverse global
jurisdictions is an intricate challenge that merits thorough
investigation [8]. International harmonization efforts are
International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering
imperative to ensure that intellectual property rights are
upheld consistently while fostering cross-border innovation
and collaboration. Researchers should delve deeper into the
potential benefits and challenges associated with
harmonizing IP and AI regulations on a global scale.
4. AI and Fair Use Doctrine: An emerging area of concern
is how AI-generated content fits within the fair use doctrine
of copyright law [9]. Determining the criteria and guidelines
for assessing AI-generated content in the context of fair use
remains a subject of debate. Researchers should explore the
thresholds and principles that can be applied to strike a
balance between protecting IP rights and promoting
innovation.
5. Responsible AI Development and Education: As AI
continues to evolve and impact intellectual property, there
is a growing need to emphasize responsible AI development
practices and educational initiatives [10]. Research should
investigate the development of ethical AI guidelines that
align with intellectual property laws. Furthermore,
educational programs targeting AI developers, users, and
policymakers can play a pivotal role in raising awareness
about the ethical and legal dimensions of AI in the
intellectual property landscape.
6. AI-Powered IP Protection Tools: Research should also
examine the development and effectiveness of AI-powered
tools for intellectual property protection [11]. These tools
can encompass IP infringement detection, content
originality assessment, and privacy compliance.
Understanding the capabilities and limitations of such tools
is crucial for both creators and IP regulatory bodies.
These critical gaps and controversies within the field of AI,
intellectual property, and ethics research underscore the
multifaceted nature of this domain. As technology continues
to advance, addressing these challenges will be pivotal in
fostering equitable, responsible, and ethical innovation in
the era of AI. Researchers, policymakers, and industry
stakeholders must collaborate to navigate this intricate
landscape and develop robust frameworks that balance
innovation with ethical and legal considerations.
3. Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Context of
Intellectual Property
Artificial Intelligence (AI) represents a transformative
force, replicating human intelligence in machines. This
emulation enables AI systems to execute tasks that typically
require human cognitive abilities, such as learning from
data, discerning intricate patterns, making informed
decisions, and progressively refining performance through
iterative learning processes. The AI domain encompasses a
spectrum of techniques, including machine learning, deep
learning, natural language processing, and computer vision.
AI's multifaceted nature categorizes it into two principal
IJISAE, 2024, 12(1), 368–376 | 369
types [12]: Narrow or Weak AI, These specialized systems
are designed to execute specific tasks proficiently within
predefined limitations. Examples include speech
recognition, recommendation systems, and image
classification.
General or Strong AI, aims to replicate human-like
intelligence across a broad spectrum of tasks, mirroring the
cognitive versatility found in human beings.
AI applications have permeated diverse industries,
instigating transformative changes in established practices
and introducing novel capabilities. In the healthcare sector,
AI plays a pivotal role in disease diagnosis, drug discovery,
personalized healthcare solutions, and predictive analytics.
These advancements not only enhance patient care but also
contribute to the evolution of the medical field.
In the financial domain [13], AI stands as a cornerstone,
driving innovation in areas like fraud detection, algorithmic
trading, and the development of customer service chatbots.
These applications streamline financial interactions and
bolster security measures, fundamentally altering the way
financial institutions operate.
Transportation [14] has witnessed a seismic shift with the
emergence of autonomous vehicles, wherein AI takes center
stage. AI technologies facilitate navigation, real-time
decision-making, and the development of advanced vehicle
safety systems. This shift marks a significant departure from
conventional transportation models.
Within the manufacturing sector [15], AI-driven automation
is reshaping production processes. It optimizes production
lines, improves quality control, and concurrently reduces
operational costs. As a result, industries can achieve
heightened efficiency and precision in manufacturing
operations.
AI's influence extends to the area of entertainment [16],
fundamentally altering the landscape. AI-driven content
recommendation systems enhance user experiences, while
AI-generated creative content, spanning art and music,
introduces new forms of artistic expression. Moreover, AI
significantly enriches the world of game development
through procedural generation and immersive virtual
environments, paving the way for entirely new forms of
interactive entertainment.
The pervasive impact of AI across these diverse sectors
underscores its transformative potential. As AI continues to
evolve, its applications are likely to expand further,
reshaping industries and unlocking new avenues for
innovation and progress.
Intellectual Property (IP) is central to AI's dynamic
landscape, holding substantial implications for its
development, application, and regulation [17]:
1. AI-Generated Content Ownership [18, 19]: The
International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering
evolution of AI-generated creative works necessitates
IP laws that grapple with determining authorship and
ownership rights. The novel challenge lies in defining
who, if anyone, should be recognized as the creator
when AI systems autonomously generate valuable
content.
2. Patents for Innovation [20]: AI has emerged as a
catalyst for innovation across various industries. This
prompts companies to seek patents to secure their AI-
related inventions, fostering further advancements and
competitive forces within the technological landscape.
3. Data Privacy and IP Interface [4]: AI's effectiveness
hinges on large datasets, often sourced from personal
and sensitive information. This confluence of AI and
data privacy regulations underscores the need for a
harmonious coexistence, ensuring innovation while
respecting individual privacy rights and data protection.
4. Ethical Considerations [21]: As AI continues to
advance, ethical dilemmas surrounding AI-generated
content, algorithmic bias, and data privacy have
garnered significant attention. Ethical AI development
and usage should align seamlessly with IP frameworks,
preventing IP rights infringements and discouraging
unethical practices.
5. Licensing and Collaboration [22]: IP licensing
agreements play a pivotal role in the dissemination of
AI technologies. Such agreements encourage the
sharing of AI knowledge and advancements, fostering
collaborative efforts among organizations and
researchers, thus accelerating technological progress.
AI stands as a transformative force reshaping multiple
sectors of society and industry. To navigate the confluence
of AI and IP effectively, there is a need for balanced legal
and ethical frameworks that accommodate the unique
challenges and opportunities posed by AI. Such frameworks
should not only promote innovation and safeguard
intellectual property rights but also ensure ethical and legal
integrity in an increasingly AI-driven era.
4. Legal Framework: AI and Intellectual Property
Rights
As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to proliferate across
industries, the intersection of AI and intellectual property
(IP) rights has become an increasingly complex and critical
legal landscape. This discussion delves into the legal aspects
of AI and IP rights, relevant laws and regulations,
international agreements, and recent legal cases that shed
light on the evolving legal framework in this domain.
The legal aspects of AI and IP rights revolve around the
creation, protection, and use of intellectual property in the
context of AI. Key elements include:
IJISAE, 2024, 12(1), 368–376 | 370
 1. Ownership and Attribution: Determining the ownership
of AI-generated content or inventions remains a
challenge. Copyright laws often require a human
author, raising questions about the authorship of works
created by AI [18].
2. Patentability: AI-related inventions, such as machine
learning algorithms, are subject to patent laws.
Defining the criteria for patent eligibility and
inventorship in AI-generated innovations is a complex
legal issue [23].
3. Data Privacy: Protecting intellectual property rights
while adhering to data privacy regulations (e.g., GDPR)
is crucial, as AI often relies on vast datasets for training
and decision-making [24, 25].
4. Liability: AI systems can cause harm or infringe on IP
rights. Clarifying liability and responsibility when AI is
involved in legal disputes is a critical legal
consideration [26].
Various laws and regulations are applicable to the
intersection of AI and IP [27]:
5. Copyright Laws: These laws differ across jurisdictions
but generally focus on authorship, ownership, and
duration of protection. The United States Copyright
Act, for instance, doesn't recognize AI as an author,
while the European Union is considering reforms to
address AI-generated content.
6. Patent Laws: Patent offices worldwide are updating
their guidelines to accommodate AI inventions. The
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has issued
guidelines for patent examiners on AI-related
inventions.
7. Data Protection Laws: GDPR in Europe imposes strict
rules on data use and processing, affecting AI systems.
Companies must navigate these regulations while
respecting IP rights.
8. International Agreements: International treaties like the
Berne Convention and the Agreement on Trade-Related
Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) set
global standards for IP protection, impacting AI
developments on a global scale.
Legal cases provide insight into how courts are addressing
AI and IP rights. Notable cases include:
1. Naruto v. Slater (2018) [28]: This case involved a
monkey taking a selfie using a photographer's camera.
It raised questions about whether animals or AI systems
can hold copyright. The U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of
Appeals ruled against animal or AI authorship but
highlighted the need for legislative or regulatory
solutions.
2. Thaler v. Hirshfeld (2021) [29]: An AI system named
International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering
"DABUS" was listed as the inventor of two U.S. patent
applications. The USPTO rejected the applications,
emphasizing that inventors must be natural persons.
This case underscores the ongoing debate surrounding
AI inventorship.
The legal framework at the intersection of AI and
intellectual property is continually evolving. To address the
complexities of AI-generated content, inventions, and data
privacy, lawmakers and courts must adapt existing laws and
regulations. International collaboration is also crucial to
ensure harmonization and a consistent legal framework in
the global context. Legal cases, such as those mentioned,
provide valuable insights and drive discussions on the path
forward in this dynamic field.
5. Ethical Considerations in AI and Intellectual
Property
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI)
technology has given rise to a numerous of ethical dilemmas
at the intersection of AI and intellectual property (IP). This
discussion explores the complex ethical considerations
surrounding AI-generated content, copyright infringement,
fair use, privacy concerns, and the ethical responsibilities of
both AI developers and users.
Examination of Ethical Dilemmas [30-33]:
1. AI-Generated Content: The question of authorship and
ownership of AI-generated works poses a profound
ethical dilemma. AI systems can autonomously create
art, music, and literature, leading to uncertainty about
who should be recognized as the creator and
beneficiary.
2. Copyright Infringement: AI algorithms can
inadvertently generate content that infringes on existing
copyrights. Ethical considerations arise concerning the
responsibility of AI developers and users to prevent and
address such infringements.
3. Fair Use: Determining what constitutes fair use of AI-
generated content is a complex ethical challenge. Users
and creators must navigate the fine line between
creative expression and copyright infringement, often
in ambiguous situations.
4. Privacy Concerns: AI's reliance on large datasets raises
ethical questions about data privacy and consent.
Collecting, analyzing, and using personal data to train
AI models must be done ethically and transparently to
respect individuals' privacy rights.
In the development of AI, ethical responsibilities are
paramount. Developers must prioritize transparency,
fairness, and accountability to mitigate societal harm.
1. Transparency and Accountability: Developers have an
IJISAE, 2024, 12(1), 368–376 | 371
 ethical duty to ensure transparency in AI systems,
disclosing the use of AI in content generation.
Accountability mechanisms should be in place to
address issues like AI-generated misinformation or
biased content.
2. Bias Mitigation: Addressing algorithmic bias is
paramount. Developers must actively work to identify
and rectify biases in AI systems to ensure fair and
equitable outcomes.
3. Data Privacy: Developers should adhere to data
protection laws and best practices, obtaining informed
consent for data usage, anonymizing data, and securing
sensitive information.
4. Education and Ethical Guidelines: AI developers
should educate users about the ethical implications of
AI-generated content and provide guidelines for
responsible usage.
AI users hold ethical responsibilities in employing AI
technology, ensuring responsible and unbiased utilization
for positive societal impacts:
1. Awareness: Users should be aware of the potential
ethical concerns related to AI-generated content,
including issues of copyright, privacy, and fairness.
2. Responsible Use: Ethical AI use entails respecting
copyrights, giving credit to human creators when
applicable, and ensuring that AI-generated content
aligns with ethical standards.
3. Feedback and Reporting: Users can contribute to ethical
AI development by providing feedback on problematic
AI-generated content and reporting instances of misuse
or bias.
The ethical considerations surrounding AI and intellectual
property are multifaceted and evolving. Balancing the
creative potential of AI with ethical responsibilities requires
careful attention from both AI developers and users. By
promoting transparency, mitigating biases, respecting
privacy rights, and fostering ethical awareness, the ethical
dilemmas inherent in AI and IP can be addressed
responsibly, ensuring that these transformative technologies
serve the greater good while upholding ethical standards and
legal requirements.
6. Case Studies
6.1. Case Study 1: The "DABUS" Patent Controversy
In 2021, an intriguing patent controversy emerged when Dr.
Stephen Thaler submitted patent applications for two
innovations created by AI systems known as "DABUS". Dr.
Thaler argued that DABUS should be recognized as the
inventor, challenging conventional notions of inventorship.
However, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering
rejected the applications, asserting that only natural persons
can be inventors under current patent laws [34].
This case reflects the ongoing legal and ethical debate
surrounding AI-generated inventions. The rejection by the
USPTO highlights the gap between existing patent laws,
which primarily consider human inventors, and the
increasingly autonomous capabilities of AI. Addressing this
issue is paramount to encourage AI innovation while
ensuring proper attribution and protection of intellectual
property rights. The case underscores the need for a legal
framework that accommodates AI's role in invention and
creatorship while preserving the principles of fairness and
equity.
6.2. Case Study 2: The "NFT Art Generator" Dilemma
The rise of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) has reshaped the art
world, and it wasn't long before AI became involved. In a
notable instance, an AI algorithm was programmed to create
digital art pieces, which were then sold as NFTs in online
marketplaces. This development sparked debates
concerning the ethical and legal aspects of selling AI-
generated art, including questions about copyright
ownership, attribution, and the rights of traditional artists
who might have influenced the AI's algorithms [35].
This case exemplifies the ethical complexities of AI-
generated content within the realm of intellectual property.
It accentuates the importance of adapting copyright and IP
laws to address AI's creative capabilities [36]. Finding a
balance between AI innovation and protecting the rights of
both AI developers and traditional artists is a challenging
but essential task. This case underscores the need for
transparent guidelines and legal mechanisms that ensure
appropriate recognition and compensation for creators while
fostering innovation in the evolving landscape of AI-
generated art.
In both cases, there is a pressing need for legal frameworks
that can adapt to the evolving role of AI in intellectual
property. Current laws and regulations often fall short in
addressing the unique challenges posed by AI-generated
content and inventions. Research in this area should explore
potential legal reforms and policy changes to establish a
more equitable and responsible approach to AI and IP.
Additionally, these case studies underscore the importance
of transparency, accountability, and ethical considerations
in AI development and usage, as they can significantly
impact IP rights and creative industries.
7. Challenges and Future Trends: AI and
Intellectual Property
Defining AI Inventorship presents one of the foremost
challenges in the intersection of AI and intellectual property.
The existing intellectual property laws were primarily
crafted with human inventors in mind, leading to inherent
IJISAE, 2024, 12(1), 368–376 | 372
ambiguity when it comes to recognizing the inventor of
innovations generated autonomously by AI systems. This
challenge carries significant legal and ethical implications,
as it raises questions about the attribution of credit and
ownership of AI-generated inventions, a matter yet to be
resolved satisfactorily.
The conundrum surrounding Copyright and Ownership of
AI-generated content further complicates the landscape.
Copyright laws, originally formulated to address human
authorship, encounter difficulties when applied to AI-
generated works such as art, music, and literature. This lack
of clarity frequently gives rise to disputes concerning
royalty distribution, licensing agreements, and the
fundamental issue of who should be recognized as the
author or owner of the creative output.
Algorithmic Bias emerges as a prominent ethical challenge
within the realm of AI and intellectual property. AI systems,
often trained on extensive datasets, have the potential to
perpetuate biases present in their training data. This issue
assumes particular significance in creative fields, where AI's
involvement can inadvertently reinforce stereotypes or
cultural biases in content generation. Consequently,
creators, organizations, and policymakers must grapple with
the ethical ramifications of AI-generated content that may
inadvertently perpetuate harmful biases.
Privacy Concerns loom large as AI's efficacy relies heavily
on access to vast datasets, some of which may contain
sensitive and personal information. The ethical and legal
dimensions of data collection and processing for AI
applications give rise to pertinent questions related to data
protection and informed consent. Striking a balance
between harnessing the power of data-driven AI and
safeguarding individuals' privacy rights remains an ongoing
challenge that requires vigilant attention.
These multifaceted challenges underscore the intricacy of
navigating the intersection of AI, intellectual property, and
ethics. As technology continues to advance and AI's role in
creative and innovative processes expands, addressing these
challenges will be imperative to ensure equitable and
responsible development and usage of AI within the
intellectual property landscape.
Future developments at the intersection of AI, intellectual
property, and ethics hold profound implications for various
stakeholders.
Anticipated legal reforms may center on amending
intellectual property laws to accommodate the unique
challenges posed by AI-generated content and inventions.
This could involve the clarification of inventorship criteria,
revisions to copyright rules, and the enhancement of data
privacy regulations. Such legal adjustments are crucial to
providing clarity and equitable protection in this evolving
landscape.
International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering
A significant trend on the horizon is the recognition of AI
systems as co-creators, potentially entitling them to
intellectual property rights. This innovative approach seeks
to incentivize AI innovation while ensuring that human
creators receive the appropriate recognition and
compensation for their collaborative efforts with AI
counterparts. The implications of such recognition are far-
reaching and may reshape the dynamics of intellectual
property ownership.
Future developments may usher in standardized ethical
guidelines for AI developers and users. These guidelines
would emphasize transparency, accountability, and
responsible AI usage. By reducing ethical and legal
challenges associated with AI, they pave the way for more
ethical and equitable practices in the field.
AI technologies are poised to play a pivotal role in
intellectual property protection. AI-powered tools can
efficiently detect IP infringements and assess the originality
of creative works. This evolution is likely to make AI an
integral component of IP enforcement and protection
efforts, providing a more robust defense against intellectual
property violations.
The harmonization of international intellectual property
laws and AI regulations is a notable future trend to monitor.
This potential development seeks to facilitate cross-border
cooperation and mitigate discrepancies in intellectual
property protection. Achieving greater alignment among
nations in addressing AI and IP challenges can foster
international innovation and equitable protection.
Governments and international bodies are increasingly
recognizing the need for targeted regulations specific to AI
and intellectual property. These regulations would be
designed to address emerging challenges and ensure
responsible AI use. The implementation of such regulations
carries significant implications for AI developers, content
creators, and organizations, as it may introduce compliance
requirements and ethical standards.
In summary, the intersection of AI and intellectual property
presents complex challenges related to inventorship,
copyright, bias, and privacy. Future developments are likely
to involve legal reforms, ethical guidelines, and innovative
approaches to recognizing AI as co-creators. The evolving
landscape will require careful consideration of the balance
between fostering AI innovation and protecting IP rights
while addressing ethical concerns and ensuring privacy and
fairness in AI-generated content and inventions.
8. Recommendations and Policy Implications:
Within the domain of AI, intellectual property, and ethics,
several crucial factors require careful consideration by
policymakers, developers, and stakeholders.
IJISAE, 2024, 12(1), 368–376 | 373
 1. Clear AI Inventorship Criteria: One of the primary
imperatives involves establishing precise and adaptable
criteria for acknowledging AI's role as co-inventors or
creators. This necessitates a reevaluation and potential
redefinition of inventorship within patent laws and
copyright regulations. These revisions must account for
AI's increasingly significant contributions to innovation
and content generation, ensuring that credit and
ownership are fairly attributed in AI-driven creative
and inventive processes.
2. Ethical AI Development: An essential pillar of
responsible AI advancement is the prioritization of
ethics throughout the design and development phases.
Developers must adhere to robust ethical guidelines
aimed at mitigating algorithmic bias, enforcing
rigorous data privacy measures, and promoting
transparency within AI systems. Stakeholders should
actively support these endeavors by investing in ethical
AI research and development. By infusing ethics into
AI's very fabric, the industry can foster practices that
drive innovation while upholding fundamental ethical
principles.
3. Standardized Licensing Agreements: Concerning AI-
generated content, the adoption of standardized
licensing agreements is of paramount importance. Such
agreements aim to simplify the compensation and
copyright attribution processes, thereby reducing
potential disputes between content creators and AI
developers. The establishment of standardized
frameworks ensures not only equity but also legal
clarity, which is essential for nurturing creativity and
innovation within AI-driven content generation.
4. Data Privacy Regulations: Given AI's reliance on data,
policymakers must strengthen data privacy regulations
and advocate for informed consent mechanisms in AI
data usage. These regulatory enhancements safeguard
individuals' rights while simultaneously facilitating
responsible AI development. Striking a balance
between data-driven innovation and privacy protection
is crucial in establishing an ethical and legal framework
that respects individuals' data rights.
5. Global Harmonization: As AI and intellectual property
transcend national borders, fostering international
cooperation becomes imperative. The harmonization of
AI and intellectual property laws on a global scale
promotes consistency in IP protection and AI
regulation. Collaborative efforts at the international
level can mitigate disparities in protection and create an
environment conducive to innovation while respecting
intellectual property rights.
6. Public Awareness and Education: Policymakers and
stakeholders play a significant role in raising public
International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering
awareness and educating the populace about AI's
impact on intellectual property. Robust public
awareness campaigns and educational initiatives
empower users to make informed decisions, recognize
the value of copyright and IP rights, and responsibly
navigate the evolving landscape.
The transformational power of AI, coupled with the
intricacies of intellectual property and the ethical
considerations surrounding their convergence, necessitates
a forward-thinking and collaborative approach. Policy
changes and reforms should be thoughtfully aligned with
technological advancements to ensure both equitable AI
innovation and the protection of intellectual property rights.
The collective efforts of policymakers, AI developers, and
stakeholders are essential in forging a regulatory
environment that effectively balances innovation with
ethical and legal considerations.
9. Conclusion
The research has explored the intricate intersection of
artificial intelligence (AI) and intellectual property (IP),
shedding light on the complex challenges and potential
future trends in this dynamic field.
Key findings underscore the pressing need for legal and
ethical frameworks that can adapt to AI's evolving role in
content creation, innovation, and data processing. The
determination of AI inventorship and copyright ownership
remains a contentious issue, necessitating legal reforms and
clear criteria. Additionally, the ethical dilemmas
surrounding AI-generated content, algorithmic bias, and
data privacy demand responsible AI development and
usage.
This study reaffirms the paramount importance of
considering legal and ethical aspects when navigating the
burgeoning landscape of AI and intellectual property. It
emphasizes that responsible innovation in AI is inseparable
from the responsible protection of IP rights, and both should
be harmonized to ensure equitable and ethical progress.
The contributions of this study lie in its comprehensive
examination of AI and IP, highlighting the challenges and
offering practical recommendations for policymakers, AI
developers, and stakeholders. By bridging the gap between
AI innovation and intellectual property protection, this
research aims to pave the way for a future where creativity,
innovation, and ethics harmoniously coexist in the AI era.
Acknowledgment
This research was funded by Al-Zaytoonah University of
Jordan Grant Number (2023-2022/17/35).
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
IJISAE, 2024, 12(1), 368–376 | 374
References
[1] K. Hristov, "Artificial intelligence and the copyright
dilemma," Idea, vol. 57, p. 431, 2016.
[2] A. Ubaydullayeva, "Intellectual Property in the Era of
Artificial Intelligence: Challenges and Solutions,"
Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy, vol. 1, no. 3,
2023.
[3] N. M. Safdar, J. D. Banja, and C. C. Meltzer, "Ethical
considerations in artificial intelligence," European
journal of radiology, vol. 122, p. 108768, 2020.
[4] J. R. Saura, D. Ribeiro-Soriano, and D. Palacios-
Marqués, "Assessing behavioral data science privacy
issues in government artificial intelligence
deployment," Government Information Quarterly, vol.
39, no. 4, p. 101679, 2022.
[5] M. Kop, "AI & intellectual property: towards an
articulated public domain," Tex. Intell. Prop. LJ, vol.
28, p. 297, 2019.
[6] M. McLaughlin, "Computer-generated inventions," J.
Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'y, vol. 101, p. 224, 2019.
[7] S. Gerke, T. Minssen, and G. Cohen, "Ethical and legal
challenges of artificial intelligence-driven healthcare,"
in Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Elsevier, 2020,
pp. 295-336.
[8] A. Álvarez-Risco and S. Del-Aguila-Arcentales, "A
note on changing regulation in international business:
the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
and artificial intelligence," in The multiple dimensions
of institutional complexity in international business
research: Emerald Publishing Limited, 2021, pp. 363-
371.
[9] B. L. Sobel, "Artificial intelligence's fair use crisis,"
Colum. JL & Arts, vol. 41, p. 45, 2017.
[10] A. B. Arrieta et al., "Explainable Artificial Intelligence
(XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and
challenges toward responsible AI," Information fusion,
vol. 58, pp. 82-115, 2020.
[11] F. Gurry, "Artificial intelligence and intellectual
property: An interview with Francis Gurry," in
Intellectual Property Forum: journal of the
Intellectual and Industrial Property Society of
Australia and New Zealand, 2018, no. 114, pp. 66-68.
[12] G. Neville-Neil, "The Chess Player who Couldn’t Pass
the Salt: AI: Soft and hard, weak and strong, narrow
and general," Queue, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 14-18, 2016.
[13] L. Cao, "AI in finance: A review," Available at SSRN
3647625, 2020.
International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering
[14] A. W. Sadek, "Artificial intelligence applications in
transportation," Transportation Research Circular,
pp. 1-7, 2007.
[15] B.-h. Li, B.-c. Hou, W.-t. Yu, X.-b. Lu, and C.-w.
Yang, "Applications of artificial intelligence in
intelligent manufacturing: a review," Frontiers of
Information Technology & Electronic Engineering,
vol. 18, pp. 86-96, 2017.
[16] R. Lachman and M. Joffe, "Applications of artificial
intelligence in media and entertainment," in Analyzing
future applications of AI, sensors, and robotics in
society: IGI Global, 2021, pp. 201-220.
[17] O. Taha, "Intellectual Property Rights in Jordanian
Legislation A Comparative Study with Islamic
Jurisprudence a New Endowment Formula " Al-
Zaytoonah University of Jordan Journal for Legal
studies, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 133-153, 2021, doi:
10.15849/ZUJJLS.211130.06.
[18] R. M. Ballardini, K. He, and T. Roos, "AI-generated
content: authorship and inventorship in the age of
artificial intelligence," Online Distribution of Content
in the EU, pp. 117-135, 2019.
[19] B. Hawashin, A. Althunibat, T. Kanan, S. AlZu'bi, and
Y. Sharrab, "Improving Arabic Fake News Detection
Using Optimized Feature Selection," in 2023
International Conference on Information Technology
(ICIT), 2023: IEEE, pp. 690-694.
[20] E. Mansfield, "Patents and innovation: an empirical
study," Management science, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 173-
181, 1986.
[21] M. A. Rothstein, "Ethical issues in big data health
research," Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, vol. 43,
no. 2, pp. 425-429, 2015.
[22] M. Bogers, R. Bekkers, and O. Granstrand,
"Intellectual property and licensing strategies in open
collaborative innovation," in Open innovation in firms
and public administrations: Technologies for value
creation: IGI global, 2012, pp. 37-58.
[23] M. Poursoltani, "Disclosing AI inventions," Tex.
Intell. Prop. LJ, vol. 29, p. 41, 2021.
[24] M. Abdallah, A. Hammad, and W. AlZyadat,
"Towards a Data Collection Quality Model for Big
Data Applications," in Business Information Systems
Workshops, 2022, vol. 444: Springer Nature, pp. 103-
108.
[25] M. Abdallah, A. Hammad, and D. Staegemann, "A
Data Collection Quality Model for Big Data Systems,"
in 2023 International Conference on Information
Technology (ICIT), 2023: IEEE, pp. 168 - 172.
IJISAE, 2024, 12(1), 368–376 | 375
[26] P. M. Asaro, "The liability problem for autonomous
artificial agents," in 2016 AAAI Spring symposium
series, 2016.
[27] I. Abdikhakimov, "Legal aspects of AI generated
content," in International Conference on Legal
Sciences, 2023, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 1-17.
[28] B. J. Keele and H. Alcasid, "Copyright and Non-
Humans," 2018.
[29] K. Taylor, "The patentability of inventions with
artificial intelligence listed as an inventor following
Thaler v. Hirshfeld," IPCLJ, vol. 6, p. 1, 2021.
[30] S. L. Anderson and M. Anderson, "AI and ethics," AI
and Ethics, vol. 1, pp. 27-31, 2021.
[31] C. Kooli, "Chatbots in education and research: A
critical examination of ethical implications and
solutions," Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 7, p. 5614, 2023.
[32] J. Casas-Roma, J. Conesa, and S. Caballé, "Education,
ethical dilemmas and AI: from ethical design to
artificial morality," in International Conference on
Human-Computer Interaction, 2021: Springer, pp.
167-182.
[33] H. Y. Jabotinsky and R. Sarel, "Co-Authoring with an
AI? Ethical dilemmas and artificial intelligence,"
Ethical Dilemmas and Artificial Intelligence
(December 15, 2022), 2022.
[34] I. Buzu, "The DABUS Affair," Available at SSRN
4175009, 2022.
[35] J. Hutson and M. Harper-Nichols, "Generative AI and
Algorithmic Art: Disrupting the Framing of Meaning
and Rethinking the Subject-Object Dilemma," Global
Journal of Computer Science and Technology: D, vol.
23, no. 1, 2023.
[36] D. P. A. D. Rafli, "NFT Become a Copyright
Solution," Journal of Digital Law and Policy, vol. 1,
no. 2, pp. 87-96, 2022.
[37] Kulkarni, L. . (2022). High Resolution Palmprint
Recognition System Using Multiple Features.
Research Journal of Computer Systems and
Engineering, 3(1), 07–13. Retrieved from
https://technicaljournals.org/RJCSE/index.php/journa
l/article/view/35
[38] Juan Lopez, Machine Learning-based Recommender
Systems for E-commerce , Machine Learning
Applications Conference Proceedings, Vol 2 2022.

International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering IJISAE, 2024, 12(1), 368–376 | 376