Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Investigation of Frequency Characteristics in Cutt
Investigation of Frequency Characteristics in Cutt
net/publication/243745572
CITATIONS READS
19 926
3 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Hideyuki Hasegawa on 19 January 2016.
Recently, ultrasonic surgical knives have been applied in a variety of surgical operations. In this paper, the operation
frequency of a surgical knife is focused on. Prototype ultrasonic knives operated at 24.3, 44.3, and 71.9 kHz were constructed.
Differences in the effects on soft tissue depending on the operation frequency were investigated using these knives. Frequency
characteristics were measured using two parameters: coagulation ratio and coagulated depth. For the same vibration velocity,
at a lower frequency, the distribution of the coagulated tissue was deep and in a narrower region around the center of the tip.
For the same vibration amplitude, the coagulated depth at each frequency was similar for all these frequencies. Furthermore,
the dependences of tissue coagulation on the vibration velocity, pressure load, contact of the tip with tissue, and direction of
vibration were investigated. From these investigations, it was found that the mechanical effect, rather than ultrasound
absorption, is the dominant factor in tissue coagulation. [DOI: 10.1143/JJAP.46.4793]
KEYWORDS: ultrasonic surgical knife, frequency characteristic, coagulation ratio, coagulated depth, heat generation, stress–
strain relationship
(a)
Prototype knife
500
24.3 kHz
400
vibration
300
velocity
[mm/s] 200
100 Transformer Laser Doppler
0
18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 vibrometer
(b) frequency [kHz]
Power amplifier
La
600 44.3 kHz
se
vibration Flange
rh
velocity 400
ea
[mm/s] 200 Signal generator
d
0
38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52
frequency [kHz]
(c)
400
300
Oscilloscope θ Vibration
vibration 71.9 kHz
velocity 200 direction
[mm/s]
100
5 mm
0 Tissue phantom z
62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76
frequency [kHz]
Fig. 3. Experimental setup for measurement of frequency characteristic.
Fig. 2. Frequency response of vibration velocity of the tip of the knife.
(a)
a b c d e f g h i j
2 mm z
(b)
i j
e g
c h
a d f
b
1 mm z
1s 3s 5s 10 s 15 s
cutting plane
Fig. 4. Results of the cutting test using the 20 kHz knife. (a) Tissue surface after the cutting test. (b) Magnified cross-sectional views
along broken lines in (a).
(a)
a b c d e f g h i j
2 mm z
(b)
f g h j
c d e i
a b
1 mm z
1s 3s 5s 10 s 15 s
cutting plane
Fig. 5. Results of the cutting test using the 40-kHz knife. (a) Tissue surface after the cutting test. (b) Magnified cross-sectional views
along broken lines in (a).
(a)
a b c d e f g h i j
1 mm
z
(b)
a b g j
c d e h i
f
1 mm z
1s 3s 5s 10 s 15 s
cutting plane
Fig. 6. Results of the cutting test using the 60-kHz knife. (a) Tissue surface after the cutting test. (b) Cross-sectional views along
broken lines in (a).
80 71.7 kHz
20
40 40 24.3 kHz
24.3 kHz
0 20 20
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
driving period [s] 0 0
0 5 10 15 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
3 vibration amplitude [µm] vibration velocity [m/s]
24.2 kHz
coagulated depth [mm]
1 60 44.3 kHz 60
44.3 kHz
0.5
71.4 kHz 40 40
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
driving period [s] 20 20 24.3 kHz
71.7 kHz
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 1 2 3 4
Fig. 7. (a) Measured coagulation ratio. (b) Measured coagulated depth.
vibration acceleration [×105 m/s2] ultrasound intensity [×106 W/m2]
Next, the relationship between tissue coagulation and the 71.7 kHz
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 100 200 300 400
output of the knife, such as amplitude of vibration velocity vibration acceleration [×10 m/s ]
5 2
ultrasound intensity [×10 W/m ]
4 2
0.6 60
o[
ati
0.5 50
tio
0.4 40
co
than those in Figs. 8(a) and 8(c). That is, the coagulation on 0.2 20
the tissue surface depends on the vibration velocity.
0.1 10
As shown in Fig. 9(a), when the vibration amplitude is
smaller than 5 mm (peak-to-zero), the tissue coagulation 0
24.3 44.3 71.2
0
frequency [kHz]
along the z axis (depth) is proportional to the vibration
amplitude, and does not depend on the vibration frequency. Fig. 10. Results of measuring the coagulation ratio and the coagulated
Figure 10 shows the coagulation ratio in Fig. 8(a) and the depth at a constant vibration amplitude (4 mm) for each operation
coagulated depth in Fig. 9(a) for three operation frequencies, frequency.
4796
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 46, No. 7B (2007) K. E BINA et al.
(a) (b)
Fig. 11. Experimental setup. (a) Tip of the knife was kept contact with the Fig. 13. Magnified view of the tip of the knife. (a) Before operation. (b)
surface. (b) Tip of the knife was separated from the tissue surface. During operation.
c d g h
a b e f
5 mm 5 mm 5 mm 5 mm
cutting plane
(b)
e
a b f
c d g h
1 mm 1 mm 1 mm 1 mm
Fig. 12. Coagulated tissue in degassed saline. (a) Tissue surface. (b) Cross-sectional views of (a).
where the vibration amplitude and the driving period were coagulated by the cavitation phenomenon. The vibration
4 mm and 10 s, respectively. The coagulated depth did not velocity was set to 2 m/s (peak-to-zero), the driving period
change for various operation frequencies. However, the was 10 s, and the driving frequency was 44.3 kHz.
coagulation ratio became larger with frequency because the The solid circles in Fig. 12(a) show the positions of the tip
vibration velocity increased with frequency. of the knife. Each line segment in Fig. 12(a) corresponds to
that in Fig. 12(b). When the tip of the knife was brought into
4.2 Identification of dominant effect in tissue coagulation contact with the tissue surface (l ¼ 0 mm), the coagulated
Effects on the tissue caused by the vibration at the tip of tissue (white part) became visible, as shown in Fig. 12.
the knife is divided into the following two phenomena. The However, when the tip of the knife was separated from the
first is the mechanical effect due to tissue expansion and tissue (l ¼ 0:5 mm or more), tissue was not coagulated.
contraction caused by the tip vibration. The second is the When l ¼ 0:5, 1, or 1.5 mm, a slight abruption of the tissue
acoustic effect caused by the exposure to strong ultrasound surface was alternatively observed.
and resulting in the cavitation and ultrasound absorption. Figure 13 shows the magnified view of the driving tip of
The absorption coefficient of ultrasound absorption is the knife in water. In Fig. 13(b), cavity bubbles appear as a
roughly 0.07 dB/cm at the frequency of 1 MHz in tissue. white haze that is distributed in the region within 0.9 mm
That is, half the energy of the ultrasound is converted to heat from the tip. Thus, damages on the tissue surface would be
when 1-MHz-frequency ultrasound propagates for 5 cm.21) caused by shock waves due to the breakdown of cavity
In addition, the absorption coefficient is proportional to the bubbles. Although such acoustical effect contributes some-
square of the ultrasound frequency, and it is roughly what to the coagulation of the tissue, it is not a major factor
estimated to be 2:52 104 dB/cm at 60 kHz. Thus, it is in tissue coagulation in Fig. 12 (l ¼ 0 mm).
very small within the frequency range employed in this
study. That is, the temperature elevation due to ultrasound 4.3 Relationship between static load and tissue
absorption is small. Thus, under the conditions adopted in coagulation
this study, the acoustical effect on tissue coagulation is The coagulation ratio and coagulated depth were measured
limited to the cavitation phenomenon. for various values (from 0 to 89 kPa) of the static pressure of
In order to investigate the above phenomena, the soft the contact of the tip with tissue. The vibration velocity and
tissue was coagulated in a water bath filled with degassed driving period were set at 2 m/s (peak-to-zero) and 5 s, re-
saline, and the distance l from the tip of the knife to the spectively. The driving frequencies of the knives were
tissue surface was changed from 0 to 1.5 mm, as shown in 24.2, 44.8, and 71.5 kHz. Figure 14 shows the experimental
Fig. 11. When the distance l is larger than 0 mm, the direct results. In Fig. 14, the coagulation ratio and the coagulated
mechanical effect does not affect the tissue and tissue is depth became larger for all frequencies as the pressure in-
4797
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 46, No. 7B (2007) K. E BINA et al.
100
coagulation ratio [%]
80
60
71.5 kHz
44.8 kHz
40
24.2 kHz
20
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
pressure [kPa]
Fig. 15. Experimental setup for investigating the tissue coagulation
2.5 depending on vibration direction. (a) Longitudinal direction. (b) Lateral
24.2 kHz
coagulated depth [mm]
2 direction.
44.8 kHz
1.5
(a) (c)
a. b. c. d.
Fig. 16. Difference in tissue coagulation depending
longitudinal longitudinal on (a) vibration direction (vibration velocity = 2 m/
s, load = 200 g, driving period = 10 s), (b) pressure
5 mm lateral 5 mm load (lateral vibration, vibration velocity = 2 m/s,
lateral
driving period = 20 s, tissue load = 100 g (left),
(b) (d) 200 g (center), and 400 g (right), and (c) vibration
100 g direction (vibration velocity = 4 m/s, load = 200 g,
200 g b. c. driving period = 10 s). (d) Cross-sectional view of
400 g a. d.
(c).
lateral
longitudinal
5 mm 5 mm
4798
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 46, No. 7B (2007) K. E BINA et al.
stress σ
σ
G η γ
strain τ
20 kHz O
60 kHz
stress σ
O strain τ Z 2=!
1
¼ !0 0 fsinð2!t Þ þ sin g dt
2 0
¼ 0 0 sin : ð5:7Þ
As shown by eq. (5.4), phase delay is a function of !, and
Fig. 18. Illustration of stress–strain diagram of tissue. becomes larger as ! increases. Thus, the evaporated
energy per period is proportional to the operation frequency
!. In this section, the difference in heat generation is
d
¼ E þ ; ð5:1Þ discussed on the basis of the hysteresis property of the
dt stress–strain relationship.
where E is Young’s modulus, is the viscosity coefficient, First, the heat generation at the tissue surface is discussed.
is the stress, and is the strain. In this study, prototype The stress–strain relationship at different frequencies is
ultrasonic knives were driven by harmonic oscillation. illustrated in Fig. 19. According to eq. (5.7), the area of the
Therefore, the stress is expressed as follows: stress–strain relationship in Fig. 19 depends on stress ,
strain , and phase delay . The area becomes larger with
¼ 0 sin !t: ð5:2Þ
higher frequency because phase delay becomes larger with
By substituting eq. (5.2) into eq. (5.1), the strain can be higher frequency, as shown in eq. (5.4). Moreover, the
described by coagulation of the tissue surface per unit time depends on the
0 vibration frequency because the vibration frequency deter-
¼ sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
2ffi sinð!t Þ ¼ 0 sinð!t Þ; ð5:3Þ mines the rotation number of the stress–strain diagram per
E 1þ ! unit time. As shown in Fig. 10, the coagulated depths are
E similar for various frequencies when the vibration amplitude
is constant. However, even in the case of the same vibration
¼ tan1 ! ¼ tan1 !: ð5:4Þ
E velocity, the vibration amplitude at a lower frequency
From eq. (5.3), strain has a phase delay from stress , as becomes larger than that at a higher frequency. Thus, the
shown in eq. (5.4). Therefore, the stress–strain relationship coagulated depth becomes larger with lower frequency, as
generally shows a hysteresis property, as shown in Fig. 18. shown in Fig. 7(b).
The area within the stress–strain diagram Wh corresponds to Next, the heat generation in the case of applying pressure
the evaporated energy per period. load is discussed. Figure 20(a) illustrates the nonlinear
I stress–strain relationship of tissue. Young’s modulus is the
Wh ¼ d ð5:5Þ gradient of the stress–strain curve shown in Fig. 20(a).
When pressure load is applied, the tissue is compressed and
The time derivative of eq. (5.3) is shown as follows: becomes hard. That is, Young’s modulus E is increased due
to the pressure load and the stress–strain relationship shifts
d
¼ !0 cosð!t Þ: ð5:6Þ towards the right-hand side, as shown in Fig. 20(b). Thus,
dt the heat generation due to the expansion and contraction of
By substituting eqs. (5.2) and (5.6) into eq. (5.5), the tissue is increased due to the increase in the area of the
evaporated energy Wh per period is given by stress–strain relationship.
I Finally, the difference in heat generation depending on the
Wh ¼ d vibration mode is discussed. Viscoelasticity in longitudinal
Z 2=! vibration is determined by Young’s modulus E and viscosity
¼ !0 0 sin !t cosð!t Þ dt coefficient . On the other hand, it is determined by shear
0 modulus G and shear viscosity coefficient in shear
vibration. Young’s modulus is equivalent to three times
4799
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 46, No. 7B (2007) K. E BINA et al.
stress σ
with pressure
(a) (b)
stress σ
b.
σP σP
without pressure
a. strain γ strain γ
O γP O γP
2γ 0
2γ 0
Fig. 20. Illustrations of (a) change in elasticity due to the static pressure and (b) change in hysteresis property due to static pressure.