Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Against
December 14, 2012, a gun, pulled out and began firing, killing twenty children between the ages
six to seven years old. Yet no laws were passed and no restrictions were ever made. This was
about eight years ago, almost all of us in this room were in elementary school, just like those
children. But could this shooting ever be justified? Absolutely not, Senators, in today’s society,
Senators, it’s for the following reasons that I give you today I urge you to vote in the
affirmation/negation of this legislation for the following two reasons: One, case law, and two
reduce in harm.
Firstly, Senators, case law. In the Supreme Court case of District of Columbia v. Heller, Former
Justice Antonin Scalia wrote that "Like most rights, the right secured by the Second
Amendment is not unlimited… nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on
longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or
laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government
buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms."
In 2016, the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that "the right of the general
public to carry a concealed firearm in public is not, and never has been, protected by the Second
Amendment," thus upholding a law requiring a permitting process and "good cause" for
concealed carry licenses in states such as Virginia, Senators because this is a Virginia legislation,
we must focus on the impact of federal laws through the supremacy clause. The impact of this
focuses on the values that our judicial system holds and the importance of the law in which
300,000 suicides, 200,000 homicides; and 10,000 unintentional deaths. A study in the New
England Journal of Medicine found that firearms were the second leading cause of death for
children, being responsible for 15% of child deaths compared to 20% in motor vehicle
crashes. A study published in the American Journal of Public Health found that "legal purchase
According to a March 10, 2016 Lancet study, by implementing federal universal background
checks could reduce firearm deaths by 57-percent, background checks for ammunition
purchases could reduce deaths by 81-percent, and gun identification requirements could
individuals to diminish.
Senators, in today’s debate we must weigh the impacts and what’s the best course of action that
would better the quality of life for individuals. We must place our best foot forward to allow
for gun regulations to assist in the ideals of utilitarianism. Senators, we must affirm/negate for
the following two reasons: One, case law, and two reduce in harm.