Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The sample of this study consisted of well-beings (N=5) in the females of age range of 18 to 20
years (Mage = 19.20, S.D = .837). This sample is drawn from the students of Government
Collage University Faisalabad through random sampling.
Gender
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid Female 5 100.0 100.0 100.0
Age
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid 18 1 20.0 20.0 20.0
19 2 40.0 40.0 60.0
20 2 40.0 40.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0
Education
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid BS 5 100.0 100.0 100.0
No of Siblings
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid 3 1 20.0 20.0 20.0
5 2 40.0 40.0 60.0
6 2 40.0 40.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0
Birth Order
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid 1 1 20.0 20.0 20.0
3 2 40.0 40.0 60.0
4 1 20.0 20.0 80.0
5 1 20.0 20.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0
Marital Status
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid Single 5 100.0 100.0 100.0
Parental Status
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid Alive 5 100.0 100.0 100.0
Family Structure
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid Nuclear 5 100.0 100.0 100.0
Residence
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid Ruler 4 80.0 80.0 80.0
Urban 1 20.0 20.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0
Family Income
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid 45000 1 20.0 20.0 20.0
60000 1 20.0 20.0 40.0
80000 1 20.0 20.0 60.0
90000 1 20.0 20.0 80.0
100000 1 20.0 20.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0
Descriptive Statistics
Std.
N Range Minimum Maximum Mean Deviation Skewness Kurtosis
α Std. Std.
Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Error Statistic Error
Personal_Growth 5 8 17 25 20.20 3.033 .707 1.118 .913 1.456 2.000
Purpose_In_Life 5 8 14 22 18.40 2.966 .776 -.552 .913 .868 2.000
Acceptance_Of_Self 5 3 16 19 18.00 1.414 .765 -.884 .913 -1.750 2.000
Valid N (listwise) 5
The above table shows the descriptive statistics and reliability coefficient of given data. The
Cronbach alpha of all three variables are closely reliable to the well-being scale of (Carol. D
Ryff, 2007). The data is normally distributed as per criteria of skewness and kurtosis.