Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Diminishing
Marginal
Utility
Theory of
Consumer
Behavior
Deriving the
3
Demand
Curve
Applications
and
Extensions
Budget
Lines
Indifference
Consumer Behavior
Curves
Equilibrium
Last Word
and Utility
Maximization
Copyright 2021 McGraw-Hill Education
To ponder upon…
Law of
Diminishing
Marginal
Do we use economics everyday?
Utility
Theory of
Consumer• After how many glasses of water, is your thirst
Behavior
Deriving the satisfied?
Demand
Curve • If you drink an extra one, how does this make
Applications
and you feel?
Extensions
Budget • How do you decide if you will keep drinking
Lines
Indifference
water?
Curves
Equilibrium
Last Word
28 ]
Equilibrium -2 4
Last Word 7 2
0
-2 MU
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Units consumed per meal
Copyright 2021 McGraw-Hill Education
Consumer choice and budget
constraint
Law of
Diminishing
Marginal Rational behaviour
Utility
Theory of• Consumers try to maximise their utility with the
Consumer available income.
Behavior
Deriving the
Demand Preferences
Curve
Applications
and
Extensions Budget constraint
Budget
Lines • At any point in time the consumer has a fixed, limited
Indifferenceamount of money income.
Curves
Equilibrium
Last Word Prices
• Goods are scarce relative the demand so every good
carries a price tag.
Copyright 2021 McGraw-Hill Education
Theory of consumer behavior
Numerical example:
Utility-maximizing combination of products
Law of
A and B obtainable with an income of R10
Diminishing
Marginal
Utility (2) (3)
Theory of Product A: Product B:
Consumer Price = R1 Price = R2
Behavior
Deriving the (b) (b)
(a) MU (a)
Demand (1) MU MU MU
Curve per rand per rand
Unit of (Utils) (MU/Price) (Utils)
Applications product (MU/Price)
and
Extensions First 10 10 24 12
Budget
Lines Second 8 8 20 10
Indifference
Third 7 7 18 9
Curves
Equilibrium • Compare Marginal Utilities
Fourth 6 6 16 8
Last Word
• Then compare
Fifth 5
per-rand
5
value
12
(MU/Price)
6
• Choose the
Sixth 4 highest
4 6 3
• Check budget
Seventh 3 (R83left), proceed
4 to next
2 item
Copyright 2021 McGraw-Hill Education
Theory of consumer behavior
Numerical example:
Utility-maximizing combination of products
Law of
Diminishing A and B obtainable with an income of R10
Marginal
Utility (2) (3)
Theory of Product A: Product B:
Consumer Price = R1 Price = R2
Behavior
(b) (b)
Deriving the (a) MU (a)
Demand (1) MU MU MU
Curve per Rand per rand
Unit of (Utils) (MU/Price) (Utils)
Applications product (MU/Price)
and
Extensions First 10 10 24 12
Budget
Lines Second 8 8 20 10
Indifference
Third 18 9
Curves
Equilibrium • Again, compare per-rand value (MU/Price)
Fourth 16 8
Last Word
• Choose
Fifth
the highest 12 6
• Sixth MU per rand, \buy one of
Same 6 each 3
• Budget
Seventh has R5 left, proceed to next
4 item2
Copyright 2021 McGraw-Hill Education
Theory of consumer behavior
Numerical example:
Utility-maximizing combination of products
Law of
Diminishing A and B obtainable with an income of R10
Marginal
Utility (2) (3)
Theory of Product A: Product B:
Consumer Price = R1 Price = R2
Behavior
(b) (b)
Deriving the (a) MU (a)
Demand (1) MU MU MU
Curve per Rand per rand
Unit of (Utils) (MU/Price) (Utils)
Applications product (MU/Price)
and
Extensions First 10 10 24 12
Budget
Lines Second 8 8 20 10
Indifference
Curves Third 7 7 18 9
Equilibrium
Fourth 6 6 16 8
Last Word •Fifth
Again, compare
5
per-rand
5
value
12
(MU/Price)
6
•Sixth
Buy one more
4 B 4 6 3
•Seventh
Budget has3 R3 left,3 proceed to
4 next item
2
Copyright 2021 McGraw-Hill Education
Theory of consumer behavior
Numerical example:
Utility-maximizing combination of products
Law of
Diminishing A and B obtainable with an income of R10
Marginal
Utility (2) (3)
Theory of Product A: Product B:
Consumer Price = R1 Price = R2
Behavior
(b) (b)
Deriving the (a) MU (a)
Demand (1) MU MU MU
Curve per Rand per rand
Unit of (Utils) (MU/Price) (Utils)
Applications product (MU/Price)
and
Extensions First 10 10 24 12
Budget
Lines Second 8 8 20 10
Indifference
Curves Third 7 7 18 9
Equilibrium
Last Word
Fourth 6 6 16 8
Fifth 5 5 12 6
•Sixth
Again, compare
4 per-rand
4 value
6 (MU/Price)
3
•Seventh
Buy one of3 each – 3budget exhausted
4 2
Copyright 2021 McGraw-Hill Education
Theory of consumer behavior
Numerical example:
Utility-maximizing combination of products
Law of
Diminishing A and B obtainable with an income of R10
Marginal
Utility (2) (3)
Theory of Product A: Product B:
Consumer Price = R1 Price = R2
Behavior
(b) (b)
Deriving the (a) MU (a)
Demand (1) MU MU MU
Curve per Rand per rand
Unit of (Utils) (MU/Price) (Utils)
Applications product (MU/Price)
and
Extensions First 10 10 24 12
Budget
Lines Second 8 8 20 10
Indifference
Curves Third 7 7 18 9
Equilibrium
Last Word
Fourth 6 6 16 8
Fifth 5 5 12 6
Final
Sixth result:4 at these4 prices, purchase
6 3
2 of item A and
Seventh 3 4 of3B 4 2
Copyright 2021 McGraw-Hill Education
Theory of consumer behavior
Algebraic restatement:
Law of
Diminishing
Marginal MU of product A MU of product B
Utility
Theory of
Consumer Price of A
= Price of B
Behavior
Deriving the
Demand
Curve
Applications 8 Utils 16 Utils
and
Extensions
R1
= R2
Budget
Lines
Indifference
Curves
Equilibrium
Optimum achieved
Last Word Money income is allocated so that the last
rand spent on each product yields the
same extra or marginal utility.
Copyright 2021 McGraw-Hill Education
Theory of Consumer Behaviour
Derive the demand curve for B
Law of
(2) (3)
Diminishing
Product A: Product B:
Marginal
Utility Price = R1 Price = R1
Theory of (b) (b)
Consumer (1) (a) (a)
MU per rand MU per rand
Behavior Units MU (Utils) (MU/Price) MU (Utils) (MU/Price)
Deriving the
Demand
Curve First 10 10 24 24
Applications
and Second 8 8 20 20
Extensions 7 7 18 18
Budget Third
Lines Fourth 6 6 16 16
Indifference
Curves Fifth 5 5 12 12
Equilibrium
Last Word Sixth 4 4 6 6
Seventh 3 3 4 4
Price of product B
Derivingsame
the (R10)
Demand
Curve• Concentrate on one good (B)
Applications
• Assume the price of the other
and
good (A) remains the same.
Extensions 1
Budget
Lines
Indifference Price per Quantity
Curves DB
Equilibrium unit of B demanded
Last Word
R2 4
0
4 6
1 6
Quantity demanded of B
Copyright 2021 McGraw-Hill Education
Deriving the demand curve
Law of
Income effect
Diminishing
Marginal
Utility• The impact that a change in
Theory of 2
Consumer the price of a product has on
Behaviora consumer’s real income
Price of product B
Derivingand
the consequently on the
Demandquantity demanded of the
Curve
good.
Applications
and
Extensions 1
Budget Substitution effect
Lines
Indifference
Curves
• The impact that a change in DB
a product’s price has on its
Equilibrium
Last Wordrelative expensiveness and
consequently on the quantity
demanded. 0
4 6
Quantity demanded of B
Copyright 2021 McGraw-Hill Education
Theory of consumer behavior
Cardinal and Ordinal Theories
Law of
Cardinal
Diminishing
Marginal
MU of product A
= MU of product B
Utility
Theory of
Price of A
Consumer
Behavior Price of B
Deriving the
Demand
Curve
Applications
and
Ordinal
Extensions
Budget
Budget Lines
Lines
Indifference
Curves
Indifference Curves
Equilibrium
Last Word
Quantity of A
Budget 8
8 0 R12 (Unattainable)
Lines
Indifference6 3 12 6
Curves Income = R12
Equilibrium4 6 12 4
(Attainable) PB = R1
Last Word 2 9 12 2
0 12 12
0
2 4 6 8 10 12
Quantity of B
Copyright 2021 McGraw-Hill Education
Budget line (constraint)
Law of
Diminishing
Marginal
Utility
Income changes
Theory of
Consumer
Behavior • The location of the budget line
Deriving the
Demand varies with money income.
Curve
Applications
and
Extensions
Price changes
Budget
Lines
Indifference
Curves
Equilibrium
Last Word • Change in product prices of
products shifts the budget line.
Copyright 2021 McGraw-Hill Education
Indifference curve analysis
Law of
Diminishing
Marginal
Utility
What is preferred
Theory of
Consumer
Behavior
Deriving the • They show all the combinations of products
Demand A and B that will yield the same total
Curve
Applications satisfaction or total utility to the consumer.
and
Extensions
Budget
Lines
• The consumer, hence, will be indifferent (will
Indifference not care) as to which combinations is
Curves
Equilibrium
actually obtained.
Last Word
Quantity of A
8
and
Extensions 6 k
Budget
Lines l
4 m
Indifference
Curves 2
Equilibrium I
Last Word
0
2 4 6 8 10 12
Quantity of B
Lines 8
Indifference
Curves 6 k
Equilibrium l
Last Word 4 m
2 I
0
2 4 6 8 10 12
Copyright 2021 McGraw-Hill Education
Quantity of B
Indifference curve analysis
Convex to the origin- Diminishing MRS
Law of Unit of A is
Diminishing more valuable
Marginal Consumer is
(high MU) prepared to
Begin
Utility at point
while unit of B sacrifice only
kTheory
(less A,ofmore
is less MRS=2/2=1
B)
Consumer 2 units of A to
Behavior valuable (low get 2 B (kàl)
Deriving the MU)
Demand marginally.
Curve
Applications 12
j
and
Extensions 10
Budget
Quantity of A
Lines 8
Indifference
Curves 6 k
Equilibrium l
Last Word 4 m
2 I
0
2 4 6 8 10 12
Copyright 2021 McGraw-Hill Education
Quantity of B
Indifference curve analysis
Convex to the origin- Diminishing MRS
Law of
Diminishing
Marginal
As the amount of B As the quantity
Utility of A decreases,
increases, the MU of
Theory of
additional units of B MRS declines
Consumer its MU
decreases.
Behavior increases.
Deriving the
Demand
Curve
Applications 12
j
and
Extensions 10
Budget
Quantity of A
Lines 8
Indifference
Curves 6 k
Equilibrium l
Last Word 4 m
2 I
0
2 4 6 8 10 12
Copyright 2021 McGraw-Hill Education
Quantity of B
Indifference curve analysis
• Indifference map
Law of – Series of indifference curves, each showing a
Diminishing
Marginal different level of utility; never cross each other
Utility
Theory of
Consumer 12
Behavior
Deriving the
Demand 10
Curve
Applications
and 8
Quantity of A
Extensions
Budget
6
Lines
Indifference
Curves 4
Equilibrium
Last Word I4
2 I3
I2
0 I1
2 4 6 8 10 12
Copyright 2021 McGraw-Hill Education
Quantity of B
Indifference curve analysis
Law of
• Equilibrium position at tangency (x)
Diminishing
Marginal
– Combination lying on the highest
Utility
Theory of
attainable indifference curve
Consumer 12
Behavior
Deriving the
Demand 10 PB
Curve MRS =
Applications PA
and 8
Quantity of A
Extensions
Budget Preferred –
6 W but requires
Lines
Indifference more income
Curves 4 X
Equilibrium
At X:
Last slope of
Word I4
indifference curve 2 I3
= slope of budget I2
line 0 I1
2 4 6 8 10 12
Copyright 2021 McGraw-Hill Education
Quantity of B
Derivation of the demand curve
MU of A MU of B
Law of
Diminishing
12
=
10 Price of A Price of B
Marginal Quantity of A
Utility 8
Theory of
Consumer 6
• At R1 price for B, 6
Behavior
4
X units are purchased
Deriving the
Demand 2
Curve I3
Applications
I2 • As price of B increases
0
and 2 4 6 8
Quantity of B
10 12 to R1.50,only 3 units of B
Extensions
Budget are bought
Lines
Price of B
Indifference
Curves R1.50 • Connect the points to
Equilibrium
Last Word 1.00 create the demand curve
.50
DB
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 12
Quantity of B
Copyright 2021 McGraw-Hill Education
Derivation of the demand curve
Law of
Diminishing
Marginal Marginal Utility theory
Utility
Theory of
Consumer
• assumes that utility is numerically measurable:
Behavior the consumer can say how much extra can be
Deriving the
Demand gained by an extra unit of A or B.
Curve
Applications
(MUA/PA=MUB/PB)
and
Extensions
Budget
Indifference curve approach
Lines
Indifference • the consumer needs only to specify whether a
Curves
Equilibrium particular combination of A and B will yield
Last Word more than, less than or the same amount of U
as some other combination.